Our Story the History of the Cucamonga Valley Water District the Region of Cucamonga Has Been Known As an Area Rich in a Reliable Water Supply for Many Centuries

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Our Story the History of the Cucamonga Valley Water District the Region of Cucamonga Has Been Known As an Area Rich in a Reliable Water Supply for Many Centuries Our Story The History of the Cucamonga Valley Water District The region of Cucamonga has been known as an area rich in a reliable water supply for many centuries. The Tongva Indians lived very close to what today is known as Cucamonga Creek for hundreds of years. At that time, the area was known as Kukumo-nga and the creek where the Tongva resided provided an abundant supply of fresh water. The Tahtam Indians lived along the mountain stream area known today as Lytle Creek. Springs bubbled up from the ground, providing the water they needed to survive. By the early 1800's, missions had been established from Los Angeles to San Diego, and everywhere in between. Mission San Gabriel was originally established near present day Montebello, and then branched out to San Bernardino. In the 1830's, the missions began closing their doors, and the land that was once owned by the missions became available to purchase. In 1839, Tiburcio Tapia applied for land in the area known as Cucamonga. Tapia built a house in the Red Hill area and planted a small vineyard. Thanks to the abundant supply of water, Tapia was able to support his homestead. Over the next few years, Tapia's "Rancho Cucamonga," as it became known, continued to flourish through extensive planting of vineyards, corn and grain fields, and fruit orchards, thanks to the abundant supply of water that fed the farms. The Rancho Cucamonga changed ownership over the years and the vineyards were expanded to include over 150,000 vines, all continuing to require a reliable water source. Settlers Arrive in San Bernardino Settlers continued to make their way to California and particularly the lands close to today's San Bernardino Valley. The travelers from New Mexico and Utah settled in areas close to water, specifically the Lytle Creek area and the Santa Ana River. In order to survive, grow crops, and build houses, they knew they must settle in an area that provided an abundant source of water. Water along with a good climate and excellent soils prompted the early pioneers to develop a long successful agricultural era. Settlers knew that in order to make their homes and farms survive, they must get water to their land. They began to build their own ditches to move water from the creeks to their lands, and dams to contain the water that was diverted. Weather Troubles In 1862, there occurred the Great Flood, which dropped three times the normal amount of rain on Southern California. Many areas were destroyed, including the ditches that used to move water throughout Cucamonga. The Great Flood of 1862 was followed by years of severe drought. Because of the lack of water in the region, water users were required to limit the water they each took out of the rivers and canyons. As land throughout Cucamonga was purchased, small water companies began to form to regulate water use. Beginning in the late 1940's and continuing for about twenty years into the 1960's, most of Southern California experienced an extensive dry cycle. All water came from about twenty-five water companies and a few water wells. The continuing dry cycle was an extremely difficult period for most of the water companies. Organizing to Provide Water During this drought period, the Cucamonga Water Company was not able to adequately service its customers both agriculturally and domestically. As a result of these conditions, stockholders in the Cucamonga Water Company and the Cucamonga Basin Protective Association organized to create a public agency that would be able to raise funds from property owners and water users to provide an adequate supply of water for the growing Cucamonga Valley. The Cucamonga County Water District was organized in March 1955 within boundaries established by the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors. The first five member Board of Directors was created: Mr. Robert Nesbit, Mr. Galer Royer, Mr. John S. Ingalls, Mr. J.F. Grass Jr., and Mr. Harold B. Blatz. At the Board of Directors meeting of August 25, 1956, Norman Hixson was appointed as the District's first General Manager. At that time, the District occupied an area approximately 22,000 acres generally bounded on the west by the City of Upland, on the south by the City of Ontario, on the east by Etiwanda Avenue and on the north by the foothills of the San Gabriel Mountains. The service area included the unincorporated communities of Cucamonga, Alta Loma, and a part of Etiwanda. Today the Cucamonga Valley Water District serves approximately 185,000 people (as of 2007). .
Recommended publications
  • Chino Basin Water Bank Strategic Plan
    attExperience statements for each of the ARCADIS team members can be found in the ARCADIS Chinoproposal (AttachmentBasin C). Water Bank Strategic Plan WaterSMART Grants: Water Marketing Strategy Grants Funding Opportunity BOR-DO-1ϴ-F01Ϭ Inland Empire Utilities AgencyAgency JasonJason Gu, Grants OfficerOfficer 66075075 Kimball Avenue |Chino|Chino |CA|CA 91708 [email protected]@ieua.org Table of Contents Technical Proposal and Evaluation Criteria .................................................................................................. 1 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... 1 Background Data ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Project Location ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Project Description.................................................................................................................................... 4 Evaluation Criteria ................................................................................................................................... 11 Evaluation Criterion A – Water Marketing Benefits ........................................................................... 11 Evaluation Criterion B – Level of Stakeholder Support and Involvement ..........................................13
    [Show full text]
  • This Browser Does Not Support Pdfs. Please
    OFFICERS OF THE SOCIETY Audrey Breeding, President Constance Cary, Secretary Bob Mackensen, Vice President Phyllis Smith, Treasurer DIRECTORS Bonnie Ayers–2001* Bob Mackensen-2002 Audrey Breeding–1997 Steve Perry-1994 Constance Cary-1987 Cynthia Pfiester-2004 Tom Crowhurst-1997 Margaret Pursch-2002 Bud Doty-2002 John Reische-2000 Dorothy Ettl-2000 Miles Shafer-2004 Bruce Harter-1991 Phyllis Smith-2000 Helen Heenan-1996 Bill Stenquist-2004 *The year the director joined the Board. The Bulletin is published quarterly by the Historical Society in Yuba City, California. Editors are Sharyl Simmons and Phyllis Smith. Payment of annual membership dues provides you with a subscription to the Bulletin and the Museum’s Muse News and membership in both the Society and the Museum. The 2006 dues are payable as of January 1, 2006. Mail your check to the Community Memorial Museum at P. O. Box 1555, Yuba City, 95992-1555. 530-822-7141 Student (under 18)/ Senior Citizen/Library ...................................... $ 15 Individual .............................................................................. $ 20 Organizations/Clubs .................................................................. $ 30 Family .................................................................................. $ 35 Business/Sponsor ..................................................................... $ 100 Corporate/Benefactor ............................................................... $1000 President’s Message Continuity and our own sense of history benefited greatly
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal Years 2021 & 2022 Cucamonga Valley Water
    CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA BUDGET FISCAL YEARS 2021 & 2022 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT TABLE OF CONTENTS BUDGET MESSAGE ....................................... 3 Debt .............................................................................................99 District-Wide Goals and Strategies ........................................ 4 DEPARTMENT INFORMATION .................. 102 Notable accomplishments ......................................................... 5 Position Summary Schedule ..................................................103 Short-Term Factors Influencing the Budget .......................... 5 Departmental Descriptions ..................................................105 Significant Budgetary Items ...................................................... 6 Executive Division .................................... 106 Budget Overview ........................................................................ 8 Board of Directors .................................................................107 Resolution NO. 2020-6-1 ........................................................10 Office of the General Manager ............................................109 Goals & Objectives ...................................................................11 Administrative Services Division ............. 111 Budget Guide .............................................................................14 Office of the Assistant General Manager ...........................112 History & Profile .......................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • March 10, 2016 Mr. Todd Noethen Vice President, Distribution Support
    March 10, 2016 Mr. Todd Noethen Vice President, Distribution Support Services AVDC, Inc. 300 Phillipi Road Columbus, Ohio 43228 RE: Archaeological and Paleontologic Assessment Jupiter Project – Navajo Road Apple Valley, San Bernardino, California Project # 2070.01 Dear Mr. Noethen: Northgate Environmental Management, Inc. (Northgate) is submitting the attached Final Archaeological and Paleontological Resources Phase I Assessment, for the Jupiter Project property located on Navajo Road in the City of Apple Valley, San Bernardino County, California. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to call at (949) 716-0050 ext. 101. Sincerely, Northgate Environmental Management, Inc. Derrick Willis Principal Attachment: Archaeological and Paleontological Resources Phase I Assessment, cc: Roland M. Longo, Haskell Architects & Engineers PA Michael H. Wheeler, Haskell Architects & Engineers PA 428 13th Street, 4th Floor 24411 Ridge Route Drive, Suite 130 20251 Century Boulevard, Suite 315 Oakland, California 94612 Laguna Hills, California 92653 Germantown, Maryland 20874 tel 510.839.0688 tel 949.716.0050 tel 301.528.1500 www.ngem.com ATTACHMENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES PHASE I ASSESSMENT Archaeological and Paleontological Resources Phase I Assessment Jupiter Project – Navajo Road, Town of Apple Valley, San Bernardino County, California Prepared for: Northgate Environmental Management, Inc. 24411 Ridge Route Drive, Suite 130 Laguna Hills, California 92653 Prepared by: Denise Ruzicka, M.A., M.S., RPA Edited by: Robin Turner, M.A. Michael X. Kirby, Ph.D. ArchaeoPaleo Resource Management Inc. 1531 Pontius Ave, Suite 200 Los Angeles, CA 90025 424.248.3316 USGS 7.5-Minute Topographic Quadrangle: Apple Valley North (1970 revised 1993) Area: 106.4 acres March 2016 This document contains sensitive information regarding the location of archaeological sites which should not be disclosed to the general public or other unauthorized persons.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Writes Spring 2011 Newsletter
    CALIFORNIA water writes Esri • Spring 2011 GIS for Water/Wastewater In This Issue Fine Wine to Enterprise GIS Esri on the Road p2 Cucamonga Valley Water District Esri Online p2 Esri News p2 The Cucamonga Valley is an area that lies Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) GIS Puts Culver City Sewer Maps in p6 Their Place between the cities of Los Angeles and San was formed in 1955 as a special district under Bernardino in San Bernardino County, the provisions of Division 12 of the California Subsurface Utilities Mapping Program p8 Decreases Cost and Reduces Risk California. Originally known for its vast State Water Code and is an independent unit of vineyards and wineries, the valley hosted local government. It was formed from 23 small iWater—Take Your GIS to the Next Level p11 60 wineries and over 35,000 acres of vine from agricultural water systems and pipelines and the mid-1800s to the 1940s. In recent years, serves the City of Rancho Cucamonga and sewer connections and an average daily de- most of the vineyards have given way to unprec- portions of the cities of Fontana, Ontario, and mand of approximately 50 million gallons. edented growth in residential, commercial, and Upland. CVWD serves over 180,000 custom- Its water source is from purchased water industrial development, with two wineries and ers within a 47-square-mile service area that (Metropolitan Water District), ground water under 1,000 acres of vineyard remaining. includes 50,000 water connections and 35,000 wells, and surface runoff from the local foot- hill canyons.
    [Show full text]
  • Listing of Self-Governed Special Districts San Bernardino County
    Listing of Self-Governed Special Districts San Bernardino County Presented courtesy of the Local Agency Formation Commission for San Bernardino County 215 North D Street, Suite 204 San Bernardino, CA 92415-0490 (909) 383-9900; FAX (909) 383-9901 E-mail: [email protected] Web Site: www.sbclafco.org Updated July 2013 LISTING OF SELF-GOVERNED SPECIAL DISTRICTS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TABLE OF CONTENTS Page AIRPORT DISTRICTS 2 CEMETERY DISTRICTS 3 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICTS 4 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS 10 HEALTHCARE DISTRICTS 14 MOSQUITO ABATEMENT & VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICTS 16 RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICTS 17 RESOURCE CONSERVATION DISTRICTS 18 SANITATION DISTRICT 19 WATER DISTRICTS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICTS 20 WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICTS 22 WATER DISTRICTS 23 SPECIAL ACT WATER AGENCIES 32 ASSOCIATION OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SPECIAL DISTRICTS 34 1 Local Agency Formation Commission, County of San Bernardino 215 North D Street, Suite 204, San Bernardino, CA 92415-0490 AIRPORT DISTRICTS BIG BEAR AIRPORT DISTRICT CONTACT: James “Pete” Gwaltney, Manager 3rd District Formed: 12/17/79 PHONE: (909) 585-3219 Powers: Airport FAX: (909) 585-2900 EMAIL: [email protected] Office Hours: WEBSITE: www.bigbearcityairport.com M – F 7:00 am – 6:00 pm Sat & Sun 8:00 am – 5:00 pm MAIL: P.O. Box 755 Big Bear City, CA 92314 OFFICE: 501 Valley Boulevard Big Bear City, CA 92314 Board of Directors Title Name Term End Date President Julie Smith 2016 Vice President Gary Stube 2014 Director Steve Castillo 2016 Director Steve Baker 2014 Director Chuck Knight 2016 YUCCA VALLEY AIRPORT DISTRICT CONTACT: Chris Hutchins, Board President 3rd District Robert “Bob” Dunn, Vice President/Manager Formed: 6/7/82 Powers: Airport PHONE: (760) 401-0816 FAX: (760) 228-3152 EMAIL: [email protected] Office Hours: WEBSITE: www.yuccavalleyairport.com M – F 8:00 am – 5:00 pm MAIL: P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Cucamonga Valley Water District Board of Directors Meeting Agenda
    ~ ~ Cucamonga Valley ® ~ Water District Service Beyond Expectation CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING AGENDA February 25, 2020 - 6:00 p.m. District Office, Board Room I 0440 Ashford Street; Rancho Cucamonga, California OUR MISSION The mission of the Cucamonga Valley Water District is to provide high quality, safe and reliable water and wastewater services, while practicing good stewardship of natural and financial resources. I. CALL TO ORDER / FLAG SALUTE 2. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO AGENDA 3. PUBLIC COMMENT Members of the public may comment on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. Comments related to noticed public hearing items will be heard at the time the public hearing is conducted. Speakers are requested to keep their comments to no more than five (5) minutes. The President may reduce the time to not less than three (3) minutes depending upon the number of speakers wishing to address the Board. Under the provisions of the Brown Act, the Board is prohibited from taking action on items not listed on the agenda. 4. GENERAL MANAGER/CEO REPORTS John Bosler, General A) District Updates Manager/CEO B) IEUA Board Meeting Agenda 5. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless members of the Board request specific items be removed for separate action. A) Approve Minutes of the February I I, 2020 Regular Board Meeting. B) Approve Board Calendar of Events. C) Approve Cash & Investment Report for month ending December 31, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Cucamonga Valley Water District Board of Directors Meeting Agenda
    .! .! Cucamonga Valley® ~ Water District Service Beyond Expectation CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING AGENDA October 12, 2021 – 6:00 p.m. District Office, Board Room 10440 Ashford Street; Rancho Cucamonga, California As permitted under AB 361, in an effort to protect public health, prevent the spread of COVID-19 (Coronavirus), and because state and/or local officials are recommending or imposing measures to promote social distancing, the public may participate in this Board meeting virtually. For those who wish to participate virtually, please use the following information: (877) 568-4106, Access Code: 955- 106-309 https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/955106309. Please be advised that members of the public are permitted to attend this meeting in person at the location listed above. OUR MISSION The mission of the Cucamonga Valley Water District is to provide high quality, safe and reliable water and wastewater services, while practicing good stewardship of natural and financial resources. 1. CALL TO ORDER / FLAG SALUTE 2. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO AGENDA 3. PUBLIC COMMENT Members of the public may comment on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. Comments related to noticed public hearing items will be heard at the time the public hearing is conducted. Speakers are requested to keep their comments to no more than five (5) minutes. The President may reduce the time to not less than three (3) minutes depending upon the number of speakers wishing to address the Board. Under the provisions of the Brown Act, the Board is prohibited from taking action on items not listed on the agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Round 3 Program/Project Concepts
    Round 3 Program/Project Concepts Color Name Agency Program/Project Email Glenn Cajar Chino CA Resident Garden Friendly landscapes [email protected] Nancy Horton City of Canyon Lake Friendly Landscaping [email protected] Linda Nixon City of Hemet Water Rate Structures - efficient Use [email protected] Eric Grubb Cucamonga Valley Water District Tiered Rates [email protected] Eric Grubb Cucamonga Valley Water District Fixed Network/Smart Meters [email protected] Nehal Thumar David Taussig & Associates Water Rate Structures with leak detection [email protected] Brian Powell Eastern Municipal Water District Landscape Guidance Manual [email protected] Brian Powell Eastern Municipal Water District Smart Controllers & Nozzles [email protected] Jesus Gastelum Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District Task force to share & Evaluate demand Reduction/Efficiency [email protected] LeAnne Hamilton Inland Empire Utilities Agency Coordinated Rebate Program - Mult. Agencies [email protected] Jason Uhley Riverside County Flood Control and Water LID/StormWater/Use Efficiency/ Flow reduction [email protected] Demand Reduction Conservation District and Water Use Jolene Church Riverside Public Utility Smart Irrigation Controllers [email protected] Efficiency Mark Adelson RWQCB Santa Ana Region Community Based vegetable Gardening project/provide [email protected] community nutrition and produce water quality services Sarah Miggins Southern California Mountain Foundation Outreach [email protected] James
    [Show full text]
  • 12402 Industrial Boulevard | Victorville, California
    :: OFFERING MEMORANDUM Capital Markets | Private Client Group :: INDUSTRIAL INVESTMENT 12402 Industrial Boulevard | Victorville, California Capital Markets | Private Client Group Value Add Institutional Quality Industrial/Office Incubator Park Priced at 50% Below Replacement Cost. TABLE OF CONTENTS 01 Property Summary Investment Summary Investment Highlights 02 Property Location Aerial Photographs Local and Regional Maps 03 Property Description Property Description Site Plan 04 The Market City Overview County Overview Sale Comparables 05 Financials Executive Summary Financing Assumptions Cash Flor Projections Leveraged Summary In-Place NOI vs. Pro-Forma NOI IPRO Forma Income Existing vs. Market Comparison Vacant Space Assumptions Lease Expirations For more information on Foxborough Business Park, please visit our website at Rent Roll www.pcgnb.com/FoxboroughBP Replacement Cost 3 FOXBOROUGH BUSINESS PARK | Property Summary 01 Property Summary Investment Summary Investment Highlights PROPERTY SUMMARY Investment Summary Investment Highlights Foxborough Business Park “Value Add” Industrial/Office Park Opportunity Priced at $8,250,000 ($64 PSF) which is significantly below 12402 Industrial Boulevard x Rare opportunity to acquire a seven building business the estimated replacement cost of $16,095,765 ($126 PSF) Victorville, CA 92395 park that is divided into 35 units. x Low future risk once the project is leased, of major Ideal Victorville Business Park Location Purchase Price ....................................$8,250,000 vacancy due to 35
    [Show full text]
  • From the Sierra to the Sea the Ecological History of the San Francisco Bay-Delta Watershed
    From the Sierra to the Sea The Ecological History of the San Francisco Bay-Delta Watershed © 1998 The Bay Institute of San Francisco Second printing, July 2003 The Bay Institute of San Francisco is a non-profit research and advocacy organization which works to protect and restore the ecosystem of the San Francisco Bay/Delta estuary and its watershed. Since 1981, the Institute’s policy and technical staff have led programs to protect water quality and endangered species, reform state and federal water management, and promote comprehensive ecological restoration in the Bay/Delta. Copies of this report can be ordered for $40.00 (includes shipping and handling) from: The Bay Institute of San Francisco 500 Palm Drive Novato, CA 94949 Phone: (415) 506-0150 Fax: (415) 506-0155 www.bay.org The cover is taken from an engraving showing the entrance to the middle fork of the Sacramento River near modern-day Steamboat Slough, in C. Ringgold’s 1852 series of navigational charts and sailing directions for San Francisco Bay and Delta. Printed on recycled paper From the Sierra to the Sea The Ecological History of the San Francisco Bay-Delta Watershed July 1998 The Bay Institute FROM THE SIERRA TO THE SEA: THE ECOLOGICAL HISTORY OF THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY-DELTA WATERSHED Table of Contents Page CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS................................................................. vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY....................................................................................................... ES-1 CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION I. Background.......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Increasing Precipitation Volatility in Twenty-First-Century California
    ARTICLES https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0140-y Increasing precipitation volatility in twenty-first- century California Daniel L. Swain 1,2*, Baird Langenbrunner3,4, J. David Neelin3 and Alex Hall3 Mediterranean climate regimes are particularly susceptible to rapid shifts between drought and flood—of which, California’s rapid transition from record multi-year dryness between 2012 and 2016 to extreme wetness during the 2016–2017 winter pro- vides a dramatic example. Projected future changes in such dry-to-wet events, however, remain inadequately quantified, which we investigate here using the Community Earth System Model Large Ensemble of climate model simulations. Anthropogenic forcing is found to yield large twenty-first-century increases in the frequency of wet extremes, including a more than threefold increase in sub-seasonal events comparable to California’s ‘Great Flood of 1862’. Smaller but statistically robust increases in dry extremes are also apparent. As a consequence, a 25% to 100% increase in extreme dry-to-wet precipitation events is pro- jected, despite only modest changes in mean precipitation. Such hydrological cycle intensification would seriously challenge California’s existing water storage, conveyance and flood control infrastructure. editerranean climate regimes are renowned for their dis- however, has suggested an increased likelihood of wet years20–23 tinctively dry summers and relatively wet winters—a glob- and subsequent flood risk9,24 in California—which is consistent ally unusual combination1. Such climates generally occur with broader theoretical and model-based findings regarding the M 25 near the poleward fringe of descending air in the subtropics, where tendency towards increasing precipitation intensity in a warmer semi-permanent high-pressure systems bring stable conditions dur- (and therefore moister) atmosphere26,27.
    [Show full text]