DOCSLIB.ORG

County of Orange & Orange County Fire Authority

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
County of Orange & Orange County Fire Authority Attachment B - Orange County Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 1 of 219 County of Orange & Orange County Fire Authority Local Hazard Mitigation Plan November 2015 This page intentionally left blank. Attachment B - Orange County Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 2 of 219 County of Orange and Orange County Fire Authority Hazard Mitigation Plan Record of Changes Date of Revision Revision Description Section/Component Revision Completed By This page intentionally left blank. Page ii November 2015 Attachment B - Orange County Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 3 of 219 County of Orange and Orange County Fire Authority Hazard Mitigation Plan Board of Supervisors Resolution Page iii November 2015 Attachment B - Orange County Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 4 of 219 County of Orange and Orange County Fire Authority Hazard Mitigation Plan This page intentionally left blank. Page iv November 2015 Attachment B - Orange County Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 5 of 219 County of Orange and Orange County Fire Authority Hazard Mitigation Plan State OES Formal Review Letter Page v November 2015 Attachment B - Orange County Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 6 of 219 County of Orange and Orange County Fire Authority Hazard Mitigation Plan This page intentionally left blank. Page vi November 2015 Attachment B - Orange County Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 7 of 219 County of Orange and Orange County Fire Authority Hazard Mitigation Plan FEMA Letter of Acceptance Page vii November 2015 Attachment B - Orange County Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 8 of 219 County of Orange and Orange County Fire Authority Hazard Mitigation Plan This page intentionally left blank. Page viii November 2015 Attachment B - Orange County Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 9 of 219 County of Orange and Orange County Fire Authority Hazard Mitigation Plan Table of Contents Record of Changes ........................................................................................................................................ ii Board of Supervisors Resolution.................................................................................................................. iii State OES Formal Review Letter ................................................................................................................... v FEMA Letter of Acceptance ........................................................................................................................ vii Chapter 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Scope ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 Planning Process ................................................................................................................................... 1 Disabilities and Access and Functional Needs Working Group ............................................................. 6 Public Review ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Online Survey Results ........................................................................................................................... 7 Plan Meetings ....................................................................................................................................... 7 Related Documents and Resources ...................................................................................................... 8 Chapter 2 Community Profile ....................................................................................................................... 9 History ................................................................................................................................................... 9 Geography and the Environment........................................................................................................ 11 Land Use .............................................................................................................................................. 12 Population and Demographics ............................................................................................................ 13 Employment and Industry................................................................................................................... 15 History of Disasters ............................................................................................................................. 15 Chapter 3 Risk and Vulnerability Assessment ............................................................................................ 18 Overview of the Risk Assessment Process .......................................................................................... 18 Critical Facilities and Infrastructure .................................................................................................... 19 Hazard Identification ........................................................................................................................... 20 Profile of Hazard Events ...................................................................................................................... 23 3.1 Flood/Storm .................................................................................................................................. 23 3.2 Wildland/Urban Fire ..................................................................................................................... 50 3.3 Earthquake .................................................................................................................................... 71 3.4 Dam Failure ................................................................................................................................... 97 3.5 Landslide/Mud Flow/Debris Flow ............................................................................................... 104 Page ix November 2015 Attachment B - Orange County Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 10 of 219 County of Orange and Orange County Fire Authority Hazard Mitigation Plan 3.6 Tsunami ....................................................................................................................................... 113 3.7 Drought ....................................................................................................................................... 120 3.8 Climate Change ........................................................................................................................... 126 3.9 Epidemic ...................................................................................................................................... 131 Vulnerability Assessment .................................................................................................................. 143 Chapter 4 Hazard Mitigation Strategy ...................................................................................................... 147 Multi-Hazard Goals and Action Items ............................................................................................... 147 Hazard Mitigation Plan Action Items ................................................................................................ 148 National Flood Insurance Program ................................................................................................... 158 Prioritization ..................................................................................................................................... 160 Benefit Cost Review .......................................................................................................................... 160 Mitigation Action Items .................................................................................................................... 161 Chapter 5 Plan Maintenance .................................................................................................................... 168 Coordinating Body ............................................................................................................................ 168 Convener ........................................................................................................................................... 168 Adopting, Monitoring, and Updating the Hazard Mitigation Plan .................................................... 168 Incorporating Mitigation Into Existing Planning Mechanisms .......................................................... 169 Flood Event Post-Disaster Policies and Procedures / Action Items .................................................. 170 Continued Public Involvement .......................................................................................................... 173 Chapter 6 Local Capability Assessment .................................................................................................... 175 Chapter 7 Plan Resource Directory ........................................................................................................... 181 Chapter 8 Appendices ............................................................................................................................... 199 Appendix A – List of Acronyms ................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • This Browser Does Not Support Pdfs. Please
    OFFICERS OF THE SOCIETY Audrey Breeding, President Constance Cary, Secretary Bob Mackensen, Vice President Phyllis Smith, Treasurer DIRECTORS Bonnie Ayers–2001* Bob Mackensen-2002 Audrey Breeding–1997 Steve Perry-1994 Constance Cary-1987 Cynthia Pfiester-2004 Tom Crowhurst-1997 Margaret Pursch-2002 Bud Doty-2002 John Reische-2000 Dorothy Ettl-2000 Miles Shafer-2004 Bruce Harter-1991 Phyllis Smith-2000 Helen Heenan-1996 Bill Stenquist-2004 *The year the director joined the Board. The Bulletin is published quarterly by the Historical Society in Yuba City, California. Editors are Sharyl Simmons and Phyllis Smith. Payment of annual membership dues provides you with a subscription to the Bulletin and the Museum’s Muse News and membership in both the Society and the Museum. The 2006 dues are payable as of January 1, 2006. Mail your check to the Community Memorial Museum at P. O. Box 1555, Yuba City, 95992-1555. 530-822-7141 Student (under 18)/ Senior Citizen/Library ...................................... $ 15 Individual .............................................................................. $ 20 Organizations/Clubs .................................................................. $ 30 Family .................................................................................. $ 35 Business/Sponsor ..................................................................... $ 100 Corporate/Benefactor ............................................................... $1000 President’s Message Continuity and our own sense of history benefited greatly
    [Show full text]
  • From the Sierra to the Sea the Ecological History of the San Francisco Bay-Delta Watershed
    From the Sierra to the Sea The Ecological History of the San Francisco Bay-Delta Watershed © 1998 The Bay Institute of San Francisco Second printing, July 2003 The Bay Institute of San Francisco is a non-profit research and advocacy organization which works to protect and restore the ecosystem of the San Francisco Bay/Delta estuary and its watershed. Since 1981, the Institute’s policy and technical staff have led programs to protect water quality and endangered species, reform state and federal water management, and promote comprehensive ecological restoration in the Bay/Delta. Copies of this report can be ordered for $40.00 (includes shipping and handling) from: The Bay Institute of San Francisco 500 Palm Drive Novato, CA 94949 Phone: (415) 506-0150 Fax: (415) 506-0155 www.bay.org The cover is taken from an engraving showing the entrance to the middle fork of the Sacramento River near modern-day Steamboat Slough, in C. Ringgold’s 1852 series of navigational charts and sailing directions for San Francisco Bay and Delta. Printed on recycled paper From the Sierra to the Sea The Ecological History of the San Francisco Bay-Delta Watershed July 1998 The Bay Institute FROM THE SIERRA TO THE SEA: THE ECOLOGICAL HISTORY OF THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY-DELTA WATERSHED Table of Contents Page CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS................................................................. vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY....................................................................................................... ES-1 CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION I. Background.......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Increasing Precipitation Volatility in Twenty-First-Century California
    ARTICLES https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0140-y Increasing precipitation volatility in twenty-first- century California Daniel L. Swain 1,2*, Baird Langenbrunner3,4, J. David Neelin3 and Alex Hall3 Mediterranean climate regimes are particularly susceptible to rapid shifts between drought and flood—of which, California’s rapid transition from record multi-year dryness between 2012 and 2016 to extreme wetness during the 2016–2017 winter pro- vides a dramatic example. Projected future changes in such dry-to-wet events, however, remain inadequately quantified, which we investigate here using the Community Earth System Model Large Ensemble of climate model simulations. Anthropogenic forcing is found to yield large twenty-first-century increases in the frequency of wet extremes, including a more than threefold increase in sub-seasonal events comparable to California’s ‘Great Flood of 1862’. Smaller but statistically robust increases in dry extremes are also apparent. As a consequence, a 25% to 100% increase in extreme dry-to-wet precipitation events is pro- jected, despite only modest changes in mean precipitation. Such hydrological cycle intensification would seriously challenge California’s existing water storage, conveyance and flood control infrastructure. editerranean climate regimes are renowned for their dis- however, has suggested an increased likelihood of wet years20–23 tinctively dry summers and relatively wet winters—a glob- and subsequent flood risk9,24 in California—which is consistent ally unusual combination1. Such climates generally occur with broader theoretical and model-based findings regarding the M 25 near the poleward fringe of descending air in the subtropics, where tendency towards increasing precipitation intensity in a warmer semi-permanent high-pressure systems bring stable conditions dur- (and therefore moister) atmosphere26,27.
    [Show full text]
  • River Forecasting and 2017 Flood
    Carson Water Subconservancy District Hope Valley, 2018 by Shane Fryer River Forecasting and 2017 Flood By Tim Bardsley, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Now that flood season is upon us, it’s fitting to illustrate how the National Weather Service (NWS) in Reno collaborates with the California Nevada River Forecast Center (CNRFC) to produce predictive models for river forecasting and seasonal outlook for the Carson River Watershed. Inside this Issue: Hydrologists at the CNRFC use well-calibrated, lumped models to simulate watershed runoff. These models generate short-term 5-day river flow and Carson River Work Days….....2 stage forecasts and 365-day water volume forecasts, the latter being most useful for spring snowmelt runoff. Both short-term and long-term forecasts STEAM Nights…....…..……….…..3 are updated at least once per day. Short-term “flood” models use rain-snow Amorous Mistletoe?…………… 3 elevation, precipitation, temperature, and planned reservoir releases. Long- Carson Flood Chronology.….. 4 term forecasts blend weather and climatology 6 to 15 days out, followed by New Watershed Faces…………6 59 years of historical precipitation and temperature data. This produces 59 River Forecasting Cntd..….…..7 different runoff scenarios allowing for probabilistic forecasts. Americorner……………………….8 The winter of 2016/2017 was a good reminder of our region’s flood potential and a good test for the National Weather Service (NWS) River Forecast system. After 12 years without major flooding in the eastern Sierra and western Nevada, a series of mainly beneficial storms in October and December 2016 primed the pump for flooding in the central Sierra and western Nevada. By early January 2017 significant snow began accumulating in the Sierra.
    [Show full text]
  • Present Weather and Climate: Average Conditions
    Chapter 4 Present Weather and Climate: Average Conditions COORDINATING LEAD AUTHOR W. James Steenburgh (University of Utah) LEAD AUTHORS Kelly T. Redmond (Western Regional Climate Center and Desert Research Institute), Kenneth E. Kunkel (NOAA Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites, North Carolina State University and National Climate Data Center), Nolan Doesken (Colorado State University), Robert R. Gillies (Utah State University), John D. Horel (University of Utah) CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS Martin P. Hoerling (NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory), Thomas H. Painter (Jet Propulsion Laboratory) EXPERT REVIEW EDITOR Roy Rasmussen (National Center for Atmospheric Research) Executive Summary This chapter describes the weather and climate of the Southwest, which straddles the mid- and subtropical latitudes and includes the greatest range of topographic relief in the contiguous United States. The key findings are as follows: Chapter citation: Steenburgh, W. J., K. T. Redmond, K. E. Kunkel, N. Doesken, R. R. Gillies, J. D. Horel, M. P. Hoerling, and T. H. Painter. 2013. “Present Weather and Climate: Average Con- ditions.” In Assessment of Climate Change in the Southwest United States: A Report Prepared for the National Climate Assessment, edited by G. Garfin, A. Jardine, R. Merideth, M. Black, and S. LeRoy, 56–73. A report by the Southwest Climate Alliance. Washington, DC: Island Press. 56 Present Weather and Climate: Average Conditions 57 • The climate of the Southwest United States is highly varied and strongly influ- enced by topographic and land-surface contrasts, the mid-latitude storm track, the North American monsoon, and proximity to the Pacific Ocean, Gulf of Cali- fornia, and Gulf of Mexico. (high confidence) • The low-elevation Mojave and Sonoran Deserts of Southern California, Nevada, and Arizona are the hottest (based on July maximum temperatures), driest re- gions of the contiguous United States.
    [Show full text]
  • From Exile to Eden Confronting Myth and Water Crises in a Desert Landscape
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU Undergraduate Honors Capstone Projects Honors Program 5-2007 From Exile to Eden Confronting Myth and Water Crises in a Desert Landscape Erica Cottam Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/honors Part of the American Studies Commons Recommended Citation Cottam, Erica, "From Exile to Eden Confronting Myth and Water Crises in a Desert Landscape" (2007). Undergraduate Honors Capstone Projects. 690. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/honors/690 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors Program at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Capstone Projects by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FROM EXILE TO EDEN CONFRONTING MYTH AND WATER CRISES IN A DESERT LANDSCAPE by Erica Cottam Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of HONORS IN UNIVERSITY STUDIES WITH DEPARTMENTAL HONORS in American Studies in the Department of English Approved: Thesis/Project Advisor Departmental Honors Advisor Dr. Paul Crumbley Dr. John McLaughlin Director of Honors Program Dr. Christie Fox UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, UT Spring 2007 Cottam 1 Abstract Citizens of Washington County are about to face serious water shortages that time­ honored myths imposed on the landscape during the pioneer era will make difficult to confront. Biblical views of the desert as undesirable wilderness drove early Mormon settlers to create an Edenic oasis. Twenty-first century residents believe the desert has been conquered and no longer poses a threat , a myth that allows for aesthetic appreciation of the landscape but also supports extravagant use of water for recreation and development.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Compiled Draft.Indd
    Avenue to the Future Westside and North Avenue Draft Background Report December 2006 Prepared by Community Planning Labratory, Academic Year 2006-2007 City and Regional Planning Department California Polytechnic State University, San Luis OBispo, California This Page is intentionally left blank Preface This report has been prepared as a class project by the students in the fourth year Community Planning Lab of the City and Regional Planning Department at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. The report contains the background information needed for the preparation of a Community Plan and Development Code for Westside and North Avenue in the City of Ventura, California. The purpose of the Community Plan and Development Code is to guide development within Westside and North Avenue with a special emphasis on design and urban form. This class project is conducted in a fi ve month long studio designed to help the students obtain an understanding of the purpose, process, and scope of planning at the community scale. Students gathered information on the existing conditions of the Community during the fi rst phase of the project in the fall quarter of the academic year. The second phase will be conducted during the winter quarter when students will use this report to draft a Community Plan and a Development Code that is consistent with the Ventura General Plan and all elements mandated by State Law. The course is structured to simulate the professional planning work environment; however it is not a perfect simulation, as the class does not have access to a broad range of information sources nor does it have the well defi ned management levels of a professional planning offi ce.
    [Show full text]
  • “Oh, These Red Hills, This Roily Water”
    JOHN (JOHANNES) GEORGE AND SOPHIA HABERLI STAHELI AND CHILDREN WILHELMINA, ELIZABETH, GEORGE, MARY, AND JOHN In the Swiss village of Amriswil, Thurgau, Switzerland, George Staheli was born on 6 February 1825 to Johannes Staheli and Elizabeth Thalmann Staheli. In this village he grew to manhood. He was blessed with entrepreneurial skills and owned a small, water powered factory on the outskirts of Amriswil. This factory made cotton yarns. Although this was his vocation his avocation was music, a genetic talent inherent in almost all of the Stahelis. He belonged to a quartet of young musicians who were in demand to play for dances, festivals and other celebrations. Their musical ability would cause them to travel throughout Switzerland and into Germany. When 24 years of age, George married Sophia Haberli in Amriswil on 17 July 1849. She was the daughter of Johannes Haberli and Anna Barbara Haberli and was born in Ilighausen, Thurgau, on 25 April 1826. Nine children blessed this union with two of them dying in infancy in Switzerland. Their children were: Wilhelmina (1849); Jacob (1850, died, age four-months in Switzerland); Elizabeth (1851); George (1854); Mary (1855); John (1857); another unnamed child dying in infancy in Switzerland, date of birth unknown; Sophia (1860, died when just over a-year- old on the Monarch of the Sea); and Barbara (1861), reputed to be the first girl of the Swiss Company to be born in Santa Clara. She was born on 25 December 1861, just 27 days after their arrival. Thomas B.H. Stenhouse began preaching in Geneva, Switzerland, in December of 1850, having been sent there from Italy by Apostle Lorenzo Snow.
    [Show full text]
  • Roland Hill (Courtesy David Ladd); Roland with Querido (Courtesy David Ladd); Roland George Hill As a Young Man (History of Kern County)
    u HISTORY LESSON u DEAN OF MORGAN HORSE BREEDERS Few early Morgan breeders have been as widely recognized and respected as California rancher Roland G. Hill. Picking up almost seamlessly where Richard Sellman left off, he became the largest breeder of Morgans in the world, as well as a strong and influential leader. RolandBy Brenda L. Tippin Hill HISTORY OF THE HILL FAMILY Wisconsin where Peter began farming. In 1856, Joseph married The Hill family traced to English roots. Roland’s grandfather, Emma Arland who had also been born in England. They were Joseph Hill was born in Henbury, England in December 1832 to married in Madison, Wisconsin and also took up farming. Ross Peter and Elizabeth Hill. He arrived in New York on October 25, George, the fourth of their ten children was born in 1864. Joseph 1848, with his parents and sister Sarah aboard the British Bark, and Emma then moved with their young children to Chehalis, “Elizabeth.” The Hills moved to Cross Plains in Dane County, Washington, farming there until the early 1870s. The family moved ABOVE: Roland Hill (courtesy David Ladd); Roland with Querido (courtesy David Ladd); Roland George Hill as a young man (History of Kern County). 34 April/May 2018 HISTORY LESSON u Rolandto Hill Los Angeles County, California by 1875, one of the original founders of Hartford, where they continued farming. Connecticut in 1635, as well as several Los Angeles at that time had barely other Hartford founders. Thomas Gridley’s more than 5,000 people living in the son Samuel married Esther Thompson, city, and just over 15,000 in all of Los daughter of Thomas Thompson, and Anne Angeles County.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Setting of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta
    Geologic Setting of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta J. David Rogers, Ph.D., P.E., P.G., C.E.G., C.HG. Rune Storesund, D.Eng, P.E., G.E. Berkeley NSF RESIN Project Meeting January 26, 2011 The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta is geologically unique 1. The depositional basin has been accumulating sediment since Cretaceous time, about 100 Ma 2. It is one of just two tectonically-controlled inverse deltas in the world; it has grown throughout Holocene time by upstream migration 3. The basin’s outlet is tectonically controlled, so, absent anthroprogenic impacts, sediments are settling via normal compaction, isostasy, and fault down-drop Presentation Overview • Tectonic Setting • Rapid growth of the delta during the Holocene Epoch • Variable foundation conditions tied to deltaic stratigraphy • Anthropogenic impacts since 1850 • Peat CO2 flux & subsidence • Site characterization issues in the delta • Preferential seepage paths • Case studies of levee failures THE TECTONIC SETTING OF THE DELTA The tectonic setting controls the geography California lies on the margins of one of the world’s most tectonically active sutures, a transform fault system between the East Mexico Rise and the Gorda Ridge. The rate of lateral offset has averaged about 22.5 mm/yr over the past 200 ka; of which about half (22 mm/yr) is taken up by the san Andreas fault. Note how SHALLOW the Earth’s crust is beneath the Coast Ranges bounding the San Francisco Bay, deepening to the east. • The central California coastline is structurally controlled by a series of northwest-trending strike slip faults, with decreasing rates of movement proceeding inland.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of California State Water Planning 1850-1928
    THE EVOLUTION OF CALIFORNIA STATE WATER PLANNING 1850-1928 r-*WATER ~~ESOURCis d_ j CN.•I·rr::~ARCHIVES by W. Turrentine Jackson and Donald J. Department of History University of California, Davis Office of the Director CALIFORNIA WATER RESOURCES CENTER University of California Davis, California The research leading to this report was supported in part by the United States Department of the Interior, under the Annual Cooperative Program of Public Law 95-467, Project No. A-075-CAL, and by the University of California Water Resources Center, Project UCAL-WRC-W-571. Contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Office of Water Policy, U.S. Department of the Interior, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute their endorsement or recommendation for use by the U.S. Government. TECHNICAL COMPLETION REPORT MAY 1983 i. c"'\fl i .•..•.In. ) 1983 \ ~ UNIVER5tW or- CALIfORNIA I .B~Rt<El~ .. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter A FRAGMENTED COMMONWEALTH: CALIFORNIA IN THE 19TH CENTURY. II WATER LAW AND THE IDEA OF IRRIGATION IN 19TH CENTURY CALIFORNIA 26 III THE SEARCH FOR AN INSTITUTIONAL BASE: THE IRRIGATION MOVEMENT, 1850-1877 55 IV STALEMATE: IRRIGATION IN THE CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE, 1878.1889 112 V THE TERRIBLE '90s: FROM THE WRIGHT ACT TO THE SECOND IRRIGATION CRUSADE 179 VI THE STATE, THE NATION AND THE IRRIGATION CRUSACE, 1900-1917 206 VII TOWARD A STATE WATER PLAN: IRRIGATION IN THE 19205 257 ABSTRACT California's water problems stretch back to the 1850's when argonauts began diverting water from rivers to get a placer deposits in stream-beds or to conduct hydraulic mining.
    [Show full text]
  • CCVFCA's Flood Flash
    CCVFCA’S Flood Flash February 15, 2017 Send news tips, feedback, and subscription requests to [email protected] CALENDAR ALERTS Feb. 16th - DPC Subcomm. mtg, Levee Funding Feasibility Study, 1416-9th St., 10:30 am Feb. 16th - Merced hearing, draft 2017 CVFPP, 678 W. 18th St., 6:00-8:00 pm Feb. 24th - Sacramento hearing, draft 2017 CVFPP, 915 I St., 10:00 am - Noon Mar. 1st - Deadline to comment on DPC Levee Funding Feasibility Study and Appendices March 3rd - Deadline to comment on O&M EIR for SRFCP March 9th - Woodland hearing, draft 2017 CVFPP, 2001 East St., 6:00-8:00 pm Mar. 15th - CCVFCA Annual Flood Forum, 1:00 am - 1:30pm @ Holiday Inn Sacramento Downtown, 300 J Street, Sacramento. Mar. 9th - Stockton hearing, draft 2017 CVFPP, 2101 E. Earhart Ave., 10:00 am - Noon Mar. 31st - Comments due for Draft Central Valley Protection Plan Update and EIR. ** = New Calendar Alert FEATURED ASSOCIATE MEMBER www.dewberry.com KEEPING UP **Check CCVFCA Website for more information on topics in Flood Flash Spillway at Oroville Shutdown after Portion of Concrete Channel Collapses During a controlled release of water for flood safety from Lake Oroville on February 7th, video by local residents showed pieces of the concrete spillway washing away. DWR halted water releases from the reservoir a few hours later in order to conduct a visual inspection and were shocked to see a large hole that spanned the width of the spillway and about 30 feet deep. Despite serious concerns about further damage to the spillway, DWR decided they had to resume releasing water because the inflows to Oroville had increased to 190,000 cfs by Thursday.
    [Show full text]