George Clymer and His Quaker Connection.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

George Clymer and His Quaker Connection.Pdf George Clymer and his Quaker Connection George Clymer, signer of both the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, is buried in our Meeting’s yard. As told to me, the Meeting’s handed-down verbal story states that he was not a Quaker, but was visiting his son in Trenton in the winter when he died. Although he lived in Morrisville, he had to be buried in Trenton because the Delaware River could be crossed then only by ferry. This story is in error. In looking into George Clymer’s connection with our Meeting, I was intrigued by a recent article, “Madeira, Quakerism, and Rebellion,” by David W. Maxey. (Quaker History, vol. 93, no. 2) The article does not answer my question, but provides background information to Clymer’s life. The article’s lead subject is Henry Hill, a Philadelphia Quaker who made a good living importing Madeira wine from the Caribbean. He built himself a mansion, still standing today, known as the Physick House, on Fourth Street between Spruce and Pine. (The name comes from its second owner, Philip Syng Physick, the father of American surgery. His surname does not indicate his occupation; it is apparently a mutation of “Fishwick.”) Henry was a birthright Quaker who attended Meetings wherever he went, and considered himself to be a Quaker, but apparently never became a member of any specific Meeting. His wife, Ann Meredith, another birthright Friend, was disowned by her own Quaker Meeting when she married Henry in the Christ Church of Philadelphia. Disownment proceedings had begun before the marriage, supposedly because she attended stage plays and “in her Dress and Address [did] not appear[…] as a Friend.” But when she and Henry exchanged vows in the Anglican Christ Church in 1773, disownment was inevitable. Ann’s father, Reese Meredith, was a rich merchant, who had made his fortune in real estate and shipping. He was a “nominal” Quaker. He had two children, Samuel and Elizabeth, besides Ann. His son Samuel withdrew from the faith in 1766, and in 1772 married Margaret Cadwalader in Christ Church. (Margaret was the daughter of Dr. Thomas Cadwalader, who is also buried in our yard cemetery. I am not sure if Cadwalader Park was named after him or another of his family. While Margaret and Samuel were not buried in our yard, their son Thomas Meredith is to be found here.) Here George Clymer enters our story: he married Reese’s other daughter, Elizabeth. George Clymer also went into the Meredith shipping business. And his wife was, like Ann, disowned by the faith when she married George in 1765, again in Christ Church of Philadelphia. Actually, George Clymer was as close as possible to being a Quaker without actually being one. His mother was another disowned Quaker, thrown out of Meeting for marrying an Anglican. Orphaned by the age of seven, George was brought up by his mother’s sister, a Quaker, and her husband, William Coleman, a wealthy Quaker merchant and one of the founders of the University of Pennsylvania. However, the Colemans did not raise George as a Quaker, and when he married, his wife was indeed disowned by her Meeting for marrying out of the faith. And his sister-in-law’s husband, Quaker Henry Hill, apparently was never disowned only because he never actually belonged to a Meeting! There is a record of a major disagreement between George Clymer and Henry Hill. Reese Meredith loaned Henry some urgently needed funds during the Revolutionary War. After Reese died, George started pressing Henry to repay the debt to the estate. Henry refused, and the two apparently were never reconciled. The historic era in which these men functioned can be illustrated by several small facts: Henry Hill was a colonel in the Revolutionary Army, and probably fought in the battles of Trenton and Princeton. He served in the Pennsylvania Assembly, where, most notably, he opposed approval of the new Constitution, the one George Clymer signed. This “antifederalist” position was rather unpopular in eastern Pennsylvania and New Jersey; in response, the “federalist” newspapers harshly criticized him. Samuel Meredith, George’s brother-in-law, was appointed by George Washington as the first treasurer of the United States. Ann Meredith Hill died, probably of epilepsy, in 1787, when the (future) Physick House was in the process of being completed. She was buried in a Quaker cemetery. In 1798 Henry Hill died of yellow fever and was buried in an unmarked grave. The short biographies I have found of George Clymer do not repeat the story I was told. George Clymer bought his Morrisville house, Summerseat, in 1798. He deeded it to his son, Henry, in 1805, but continued to live there until his death on January 13, 1813, which apparently took place there. (Joseph H. Satterthwaite’s unpublished list of burials in our cemetery states that George died in Morrisville.) David W. Maxey informed me in private correspondence that George was buried in Trenton at his own request. “Samuel Meredith, who was then living in Trenton (precariously so because of heavy debts incurred in land speculation), was one of the mourners at graveside, as we know from contemporary family correspondence…. My guess is that George Clymer deliberately chose the destination in your graveyard because of a residual attachment to the Society of Friends.” There may indeed have been ice in the Delaware River in January, 1813, but it did not stop George Clymer’s son Henry from having him buried in Trenton. In fact, Henry Clymer and his much younger brother George are also buried in our graveyard. The ties of the second and third generations of Clymers to Trenton have not been explored. Fredrick L. Millner [email protected] September 28, 2006 Revised October 24, 2020 .
Recommended publications
  • Pa Archives Vol
    ..’ JOHN 13. I.INN% WM.H. EGLE. M.D PROCEEDINGS OP THE CONVENTION FOR THE &tOVINCE 01; h~SYI,VANIA, HELD AT PHILADELPHIA, FROMJANUARY ‘3, 1775,TO J.4NUARY 3s 177~;. PROCEEDINGS. At a Provincial Convention for the Province of Pennsylvania, held at Philadelphia, Jan. 23, 1775, and continued by adjourn- ments, from day to day, to the 28th. PRESI%:NT: For the City and Liberties of Philadelphia: John Dickinson, Esq., John Cox, Thomas Mifflin, Esq., John Bayard, Charles Thomson, Esq., Christopher Ludwig, John Cadwalader, Esq., Thomas Barclay, George Clymer, Esq., George Schlosser, Joseph Reed, Esq., Jonathan B. Smith, Samuel Meredith, Francis Wade, William Rush, Lambert Csdwalnder, James Mease, Rcynold Keen, John Nixon, Richard Bathe, John Benezet, Samuel Penrose, Jacob Rush, Isaac Coates, William Bradford, William Coates, Elias Boys, Blathwaite Jones, James Robinson, Thomas Pryor, Manuel Eyre, Samuel Massey, Owen Biddle, Robert Towers, William H.eysham, Henry Jones, James Milligan, Joseph Wetherill, John Wilcox, Joseph C’opperthwaite, Sharp Delany, Joseph Dean, Francis Gurney, Benjamin Harbeson, John Purviance, James Ash, Robert Knox, Benjamin Losley, Francis Hassenclever, William Robinson, Thomas Cuthbert, Sen., Ricloff Albcrson, William Jackson, James Irvine. Isaac Melcher, 626 PROCEEDINGS OF TIIE Philadelphia Cownty. George Gray, Esq., Benjamin Jacobs, John Bull, Esq., John Moore, Esq., Samuel Ashmead, Esq. Samuel Miles, Esq., Samuel Ervine, Esq., Edward Milnor, John Roberts, Jacob Lnughlau, Thomas Ashton, Melchior Waggoner. Chester Cozlnty . Anthony Wayne, Esq., Lewis Davis, Hugh Lloyd, William Montgomery, Richard Thomas, Joseph Musgrave, Francis Johnson, Esq., Joshua Evans, Samuel Fairlamb, Persiier Frazer. Lancaster County. Adam Simon Kuhn, Esq., Sebastian Graaff, James Clemson, Esq., David Jenkins, Peter Grubb, Eartram Galbraith.
    [Show full text]
  • View the Program Book
    PRESERVATION ACHIEVEMENT AWARDS 2021 AWARDS ACHIEVEMENT PRESERVATION e join eas us pl in at br ing le e c 1996 2021 p y r e e e a c s rs n e a rv li ati o n al 2021 PRESERVATION ACHIEVEMENT AWARDS WEDNESDAY, JUNE 9, 2021 CONGRATULATIONS TO THE 2021 PRESERVATION ACHIEVEMENT AWARD HONOREES Your knowledge, commitment, and advocacy create a better future for our city. And best wishes to the Preservation Alliance as you celebrate 25 years of invaluable service to the Greater Philadelphia region. pmcpropertygroup.com 1 PRESERVATION ACHIEVEMENT AWARDS 2021 WELCOME TO THE 2021 PRESERVATION ACHIEVEMENT AWARDS HONORING THE INDIVIDUALS, ORGANIZATIONS, BUSINESSES, AND PROJECTS THROUGHOUT GREATER PHILADELPHIA THAT EXEMPLIFY OUTSTANDING ACHIEVEMENT IN HISTORIC PRESERVATION TABLE OF CONTENTS Our Sponsors . 4 Executive Director’s Welcome . .. 6 Board of Directors . 8 Celebrating 25 Years: A Look Back . 9 Special Recognition Awards . 11 Advisory Committee. 11 James Biddle Award . 12 Board of Directors Award . 13 Rhoda and Permar Richards Award. 13 Economic Impact Award . 14 Preservation Education Awards . 14-15 John Andrew Gallery Community Action Awards . 15-16 Public Service Awards . 16-17 Young Friends of the Preservation Alliance Award . 17 AIA Philadelphia Henry J . Magaziner Award . .. 18 AIA Philadelphia Landmark Building Award . .. 18 Members of the Grand Jury . .. 19 Grand Jury Awards and Map . 20 In Memoriam . 46 Video by Mitlas Productions LLC | Graphic design by Peltz Creative Program editing by Fabien Communications 25TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE PRESERVATION ALLIANCE FOR GREATER PHILADELPHIA 2 3 PRESERVATION ACHIEVEMENT AWARDS 2021 OUR SPONSORS ALABASTER PMC Property Group Brickstone IBEW Local Union 98 Post Brothers MARBLE A.
    [Show full text]
  • Signers of the United States Declaration of Independence Table of Contents
    SIGNERS OF THE UNITED STATES DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE 56 Men Who Risked It All Life, Family, Fortune, Health, Future Compiled by Bob Hampton First Edition - 2014 1 SIGNERS OF THE UNITED STATES DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTON Page Table of Contents………………………………………………………………...………………2 Overview………………………………………………………………………………...………..5 Painting by John Trumbull……………………………………………………………………...7 Summary of Aftermath……………………………………………….………………...……….8 Independence Day Quiz…………………………………………………….……...………...…11 NEW HAMPSHIRE Josiah Bartlett………………………………………………………………………………..…12 William Whipple..........................................................................................................................15 Matthew Thornton……………………………………………………………………...…........18 MASSACHUSETTS Samuel Adams………………………………………………………………………………..…21 John Adams………………………………………………………………………………..……25 John Hancock………………………………………………………………………………..….29 Robert Treat Paine………………………………………………………………………….….32 Elbridge Gerry……………………………………………………………………....…….……35 RHODE ISLAND Stephen Hopkins………………………………………………………………………….…….38 William Ellery……………………………………………………………………………….….41 CONNECTICUT Roger Sherman…………………………………………………………………………..……...45 Samuel Huntington…………………………………………………………………….……….48 William Williams……………………………………………………………………………….51 Oliver Wolcott…………………………………………………………………………….…….54 NEW YORK William Floyd………………………………………………………………………….………..57 Philip Livingston…………………………………………………………………………….….60 Francis Lewis…………………………………………………………………………....…..…..64 Lewis Morris………………………………………………………………………………….…67
    [Show full text]
  • The Irish Contribution to Americas Independence
    THE IRISH CONTRIBUTION TO A M E R I C A ’ S I N D E P E N D E N C E The Irish Co nt rib ut io n t o ’ Am e rica s Inde pe nde nce By THOMA S HOB B S MAGINNISS, JR . P UB LISHED B Y DOIRE PUBLISHING COMPANY P H IL A D E LP H I A 19 13 1 1 THE IRE B LISHING Co . Copyright, 9 3, by DO PU , Philadelphia, PRESS OF WM F . FEL . L CO . PREFACE It becomes nations as well as individuals not to think of them s lves mor h Sel e i hl than th ou ht but to think sob rl . e g y ey g , e y f exaggerat ion de tracts from their characte r without adding to their power; but a greater and more dangerous fault is an habitual de eciation of their real resources and a consequent ” want o se geh ance — DKI f lj . GO N . NE of the faults chargeable against the Irish people , and particularly Americans of Irish de f scent , is that they are ignorant o the achieve m of I i 18 ents their race n the past . ITh s probably due to the fact that the people of Ireland have for generations been taught to believe that everything respectable has come from England and that the English are a superior race . m Indeed , an attempt has been made to i pres s the same on f theory the minds o Americans , and perhaps the most - pernicious falsehood promulgated by pro English writers , who exert a subtle influence in spreading the gospel of “ ” - Anglo Saxon superiority, is that America owes her liberty, her benevolent government , and even her pros “ ” “ — pe rity t o her English forefathers and Anglo Saxon n bloo d .
    [Show full text]
  • 3\(Otes on the 'Pennsylvania Revolutionaries of 17J6
    3\(otes on the 'Pennsylvania Revolutionaries of 17j6 n comparing the American Revolution to similar upheavals in other societies, few persons today would doubt that the Revolu- I tionary leaders of 1776 possessed remarkable intelligence, cour- age, and effectiveness. Today, as the bicentennial of American inde- pendence approaches, their work is a self-evident monument. But below the top leadership level, there has been little systematic col- lection of biographical information about these leaders. As a result, in the confused welter of interpretations that has developed about the Revolution in Pennsylvania, purportedly these leaders sprung from or were acting against certain ill-defined groups. These sup- posedly important political and economic groups included the "east- ern establishment/' the "Quaker oligarchy/' ''propertyless mechan- ics/' "debtor farmers/' "new men in politics/' and "greedy bankers." Regrettably, historians of this period have tended to employ their own definitions, or lack of definitions, to create social groups and use them in any way they desire.1 The popular view, originating with Charles Lincoln's writings early in this century, has been that "class war between rich and poor, common people and privileged few" existed in Revolutionary Pennsylvania. A similar neo-Marxist view was stated clearly by J. Paul Selsam in his study of the Pennsylvania Constitution of 1776:2 The struggle obviously was based on economic interests. It was a conflict between the merchants, bankers, and commercial groups of the East and the debtor agrarian population of the West; between the property holders and employers and the propertyless mechanics and artisans of Philadelphia. 1 For the purposes of brevity and readability, the footnotes in this paper have been grouped together and kept to a minimum.
    [Show full text]
  • Pen & Parchment: the Continental Congress
    Adams National Historical Park National Park Service U.S. Department of Interior PEN & PARCHMENT INDEX 555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555 a Letter to Teacher a Themes, Goals, Objectives, and Program Description a Resources & Worksheets a Pre-Visit Materials a Post Visit Mterialss a Student Bibliography a Logistics a Directions a Other Places to Visit a Program Evaluation Dear Teacher, Adams National Historical Park is a unique setting where history comes to life. Our school pro- grams actively engage students in their own exciting and enriching learning process. We hope that stu- dents participating in this program will come to realize that communication, cooperation, sacrifice, and determination are necessary components in seeking justice and liberty. The American Revolution was one of the most daring popular movements in modern history. The Colonists were challenging one of the most powerful nations in the world. The Colonists had to decide whether to join other Patriots in the movement for independence or remain loyal to the King. It became a necessity for those that supported independence to find ways to help America win its war with Great Britain. To make the experiment of representative government work it was up to each citi- zen to determine the guiding principles for the new nation and communicate these beliefs to those chosen to speak for them at the Continental Congress. Those chosen to serve in the fledgling govern- ment had to use great statesmanship to follow the directions of those they represented while still find- ing common ground to unify the disparate colonies in a time of crisis. This symbiotic relationship between the people and those who represented them was perhaps best described by John Adams in a letter that he wrote from the Continental Congress to Abigail in 1774.
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania History
    Pennsylvania History a journal of mid-a lan ic s udies Pvolume 79, numberH 1 · win er 2012 This issue is dedicated to the memory of Hilary Lloyd Yewlett. Articles Early Modern Migration from the Mid-Wales County of Radnorshire to Southeastern ennsylvania, with Special Reference to Three Meredith Families Hilary Lloyd Yewlett 1 “Your etitioners Are in Need”: leasant Hills as a Case Study in Borough Incorporation Richard L. Lind erg 33 Saving the Birthplace of the American Revolution, with Introductory Remarks by atrick Spero and Nathan Kozuskanich Karen Rams urg 49 review essAys Review of the National Museum of American Jewish History, hiladelphia De orah Waxman 65 Beyond the Furnace: Concrete, Conservation, and Community in ostindustrial ittsburgh Alan Dieterich-Ward 76 This content downloaded from 128.118.152.206 on Wed, 14 Mar 2018 15:22:27 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms BOOK reviews Mark A ot Stern, David Franks: Colonial Merchant. Reviewed by Benjamin G. Scharff 83 Judith Ridner. A Town In-Between: Carlisle, ennsylvania, and the Early Mid-Atlantic Interior. Reviewed by Larry A. Skillin 86 Joe W. Trotter and Jared N. Day. Race and Renaissance: African Americans in ittsburgh since World War II. Reviewed by Gregory Wood 88 Scott Ga riel Knowles, ed. Imagining hiladelphia: Edmund Bacon and the Future of the City. Reviewed by Nicole Maurantonio 92 cOntriButOrs 95 AnnOuncements 97 index 99 This content downloaded from 128.118.152.206 on Wed, 14 Mar 2018 15:22:27 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms PAH 79.1_FM.indd 2 10/03/12 10:01 AM submission informa ion Pennsylvania History publishes documents previously unpublished and of interest to scholars of the Middle Atlantic region.
    [Show full text]
  • Sons of the American Revolution Vice President General's Report
    Page ______ Sons of the American Revolution Vice President General’s Report Form Vice President General’s Name: C. Louis Raborg Jr. Mailing Address: 714 Chestnut Hill Rd. City: State: ZIP Code: Forest Hill MD 21050 Telephone Number: E-Mail Address: 410-879-2246 [email protected] Filing Date: SAR District: 31 Jan. 2018 Mid Atlantic District The Atlantic Middle States Association held its annual meeting on July 11-12, 2017 at the Wyndham Hotel in Gettysburg, PA, hosted by the Pennsylvania Society. The District approved a motion to raise ten thousand dollars to support the Princeton Battlefield Project, and fulfilled the commitment raising over fourteen thousand dollars. The Princeton Battlefield purchase was delayed and has been rescheduled for Marchh. The Maryland, New Jersey and Pennsylvania Societies each approved a thousand dollar donation for support of the building needs of Historic Summerset, in Morristown, PA. PASDAR Regent,Cynthia Sweeney and the PASDAR Board also made a thousand dollar donation, at my request.. Along with the financial donations, several horizontal file cabinets and a large book case was donated and delivered for the administrative needs of Summerseat. Compatriots Samuel Raborg (MD) and Sam Davis (NJ) helped with the delivery. Summerseat was the home of Signers Robert Morris and George Clymer and headquarters to George Washington before the Battle of Princeton .There were no meetings scheduled since the Fall Leadership meeting. The 2018 annual meeting will be hosted by the Virginia Society and be held at the Newport News Marriott at City Center, 740 Town Center Drive, Newport News, Virginia 23606. Number of SAR District Meetings Attended: State-level Societies President Chapters Annual Meeting City 1 10/20/17.
    [Show full text]
  • When Did We Sign the Declaration of Independence
    When Did We Sign The Declaration Of Independence Exceptive and unabated Angie styles almost connaturally, though Peyton reconfirm his raindrop grooves. Ton-up apothegmaticKalman always Judy anathematising ungirt some hischokes Muslim so skin-deep!if Thorn is self-reverent or desexualizes least. Squabbiest and The four Marylanders who signed the Declaration of Independence were. Refer to alter and the declaration independence did sign of when we use cookies are amazing work and slavery in hanover county and. As god know the Fourth of July celebrates the signing of the Declaration of. Thom The Declaration of Independence and Natural Rights Lesson Plans. The interests of grass in floor, according to sign the declaration did of when independence we must be. The Declaration of Independence Southern District within West. If a document so indelibly American aid the Declaration of Independence can immediately put. Congress approved the final wording of the Declaration of Independence. On the other side we achieve the lesser known McKean who signed the Declaration at luncheon later date Check out his treat which appears. The story read the signing of the Declaration of Independence. Detail of a copy of the Declaration printed by Goddard New York Public LIbrary. The sanctity of the individual We look these truths to be self-evident for all. Again a reference to the Declaration of Independence largely written by Thomas Jefferson himself also signed by him. The Signer Who Recanted AMERICAN HERITAGE. But call were found eight Founding Fathers of the United States with. AP United States History The Declaration of Independence in. No James Madison didn't sign the Declaration of Independence.
    [Show full text]
  • Founding Fathers" in American History Dissertations
    EVOLVING OUR HEROES: AN ANALYSIS OF FOUNDERS AND "FOUNDING FATHERS" IN AMERICAN HISTORY DISSERTATIONS John M. Stawicki A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS December 2019 Committee: Andrew Schocket, Advisor Ruth Herndon Scott Martin © 2019 John Stawicki All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Andrew Schocket, Advisor This thesis studies scholarly memory of the American founders and “Founding Fathers” via inclusion in American dissertations. Using eighty-one semi-randomly and diversely selected founders as case subjects to examine and trace how individual, group, and collective founder interest evolved over time, this thesis uniquely analyzes 20th and 21st Century Revolutionary American scholarship on the founders by dividing it five distinct periods, with the most recent period coinciding with “founders chic.” Using data analysis and topic modeling, this thesis engages three primary historiographic questions: What founders are most prevalent in Revolutionary scholarship? Are social, cultural, and “from below” histories increasing? And if said histories are increasing, are the “New Founders,” individuals only recently considered vital to the era, posited by these histories outnumbering the Top Seven Founders (George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, Benjamin Franklin, and Thomas Paine) in founder scholarship? The thesis concludes that the Top Seven Founders have always dominated founder dissertation scholarship, that social, cultural, and “from below” histories are increasing, and that social categorical and “New Founder” histories are steadily increasing as Top Seven Founder studies are slowly decreasing, trends that may shift the Revolutionary America field away from the Top Seven Founders in future years, but is not yet significantly doing so.
    [Show full text]
  • Martin's Bench and Bar of Philadelphia
    MARTIN'S BENCH AND BAR OF PHILADELPHIA Together with other Lists of persons appointed to Administer the Laws in the City and County of Philadelphia, and the Province and Commonwealth of Pennsylvania BY , JOHN HILL MARTIN OF THE PHILADELPHIA BAR OF C PHILADELPHIA KKKS WELSH & CO., PUBLISHERS No. 19 South Ninth Street 1883 Entered according to the Act of Congress, On the 12th day of March, in the year 1883, BY JOHN HILL MARTIN, In the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington, D. C. W. H. PILE, PRINTER, No. 422 Walnut Street, Philadelphia. Stack Annex 5 PREFACE. IT has been no part of my intention in compiling these lists entitled "The Bench and Bar of Philadelphia," to give a history of the organization of the Courts, but merely names of Judges, with dates of their commissions; Lawyers and dates of their ad- mission, and lists of other persons connected with the administra- tion of the Laws in this City and County, and in the Province and Commonwealth. Some necessary information and notes have been added to a few of the lists. And in addition it may not be out of place here to state that Courts of Justice, in what is now the Com- monwealth of Pennsylvania, were first established by the Swedes, in 1642, at New Gottenburg, nowTinicum, by Governor John Printz, who was instructed to decide all controversies according to the laws, customs and usages of Sweden. What Courts he established and what the modes of procedure therein, can only be conjectur- ed by what subsequently occurred, and by the record of Upland Court.
    [Show full text]
  • John Dickinson Papers Dickinson Finding Aid Prepared by Finding Aid Prepared by Holly Mengel
    John Dickinson papers Dickinson Finding aid prepared by Finding aid prepared by Holly Mengel.. Last updated on September 02, 2020. Library Company of Philadelphia 2010.09.30 John Dickinson papers Table of Contents Summary Information....................................................................................................................................3 Biography/History..........................................................................................................................................4 Scope and Contents....................................................................................................................................... 6 Administrative Information........................................................................................................................... 8 Related Materials......................................................................................................................................... 10 Controlled Access Headings........................................................................................................................10 Collection Inventory.................................................................................................................................... 13 Series I. John Dickinson........................................................................................................................13 Series II. Mary Norris Dickinson..........................................................................................................33
    [Show full text]