DOCSLIB.ORG

Pedestrian and Bicycle Transportation Access at the California/Baja California Poes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pedestrian and Bicycle Transportation Access at the California/Baja California Poes TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 1.1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................8 1.2 COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT .........................................................................................................9 1.3 EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS AND ASSESSMENT .................................................................................... 11 1.4 PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS AND FUTURE CONDITIONS ................................................................................... 12 1.5 TRAVEL BEHAVIOR SURVEY RESULTS .............................................................................................................. 12 1.6 RECOMMENDED PROJECTS AND POLICIES ....................................................................................................... 13 1.7 FUNDING AND IMPLEMENTATION OPPORTUNITIES ........................................................................................ 14 1.8 NEXT STEPS ..................................................................................................................................................... 14 1.9 CONDENSED PROJECT LIST ............................................................................................................................. 15 2.0 INTRODUCTION 42 2.1 DESCRIPTION OF BORDER FUNCTION ............................................................................................................. 43 2.2 DEMOGRAPHIC DATA ...................................................................................................................................... 47 2.3 CROSSING AND WAIT TIME SUMMARIES ......................................................................................................... 49 2.4 ENVIRONMENTAL, HEALTH, AND ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF BORDER ACCESS ................................................ 50 3.0 COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT 53 3.1 PROJECT KICKOFF ............................................................................................................................................ 54 3.2 OUTREACH EVENTS ......................................................................................................................................... 55 3.3 FINDINGS .......................................................................................................................................................... 56 4.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS AND ASSESSMENTS 58 4.1 ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY .............................................................................................................................. 58 4.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................................. 62 5.0 PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS AND FUTURE CONDITIONS 88 5.1 SAN YSIDRO/PUERTA MÉXICO-EL CHAPARRAL .............................................................................................. 89 5.2 OTAY MESA/MESA DE OTAY ............................................................................................................................ 95 5.3 TECATE/TECATE .............................................................................................................................................. 99 5.4 CALEXICO WEST/MEXICALI I ........................................................................................................................ 100 5.5 CALEXICO EAST/MEXICALI II ........................................................................................................................ 104 5.6 ANDRADE/LOS ALGODONES .......................................................................................................................... 105 5.7 NEW POES AND CROSS-BORDER FACILITY .................................................................................................. 106 TABLE OF CONTENTS | i 6.0 TRAVEL BEHAVIOR SURVEY RESULTS 108 6.1 EXISTING STUDIES ......................................................................................................................................... 108 6.2 TRANSPORTATION MODE .............................................................................................................................. 109 6.3 TRIP FREQUENCY ........................................................................................................................................... 111 6.4 TRIP PURPOSE ................................................................................................................................................ 112 7.0 RECOMMENDED PROJECTS AND POLICIES 114 7.1 SAN YSIDRO/PUERTA MÉXICO-EL CHAPARRAL ............................................................................................ 116 7.2 OTAY MESA/MESA DE OTAY .......................................................................................................................... 122 7.3 TECATE/TECATE ............................................................................................................................................ 128 7.4 CALEXICO WEST/MEXICALI I ........................................................................................................................ 133 7.5 CALEXICO EAST/MEXICALI II ........................................................................................................................ 139 7.6 ANDRADE/LOS ALGODONES .......................................................................................................................... 144 7.7 POLICIES ......................................................................................................................................................... 148 8.0 FUNDING AND IMPLEMENTATION OPPORTUNITIES 149 8.2 FEDERAL FUNDING PROGRAMS – U.S. ........................................................................................................... 150 8.3 FEDERAL FUNDING PROGRAMS – MEXICO .................................................................................................... 154 8.4 STATE FUNDING PROGRAMS – U.S................................................................................................................ 157 8.5 LOCAL FUNDING PROGRAMS – U.S. .............................................................................................................. 161 8.6 PRIVATE INVESTMENTS – BINATIONAL.......................................................................................................... 162 8.7 TRIBAL FUNDING PROGRAMS ........................................................................................................................ 163 9.0 NEXT STEPS 164 9.1 VISION AND STRATEGY .................................................................................................................................. 164 9.2 PROJECT PRIORITIZATION ............................................................................................................................. 165 9.3 CONCLUDING THE STUDY ............................................................................................................................. 165 TABLE OF CONTENTS | ii FIGURES FIGURE 1.1 SAN YSIDRO/PUERTA MÉXICO-EL CHAPARRAL PEDESTRIAN, TRANSIT, AND VEHICLE PROJECTS ....................... 18 FIGURE 1.2 SAN YSIDRO/PUERTA MÉXICO-EL CHAPARRAL BICYCLE PROJECTS ................................................................................... 19 FIGURE 1.3 OTAY MESA/MESA DE OTAY PEDESTRIAN, TRANSIT, AND VEHICLE PROJECTS ............................................................. 23 FIGURE 1.4 OTAY MESA/MESA DE OTAY BICYCLE PROJECTS ......................................................................................................................... 24 FIGURE 1.5 TECATE/TECATE PEDESTRIAN, TRANSIT, AND VEHICLE PROJECTS ..................................................................................... 27 FIGURE 1.6 TECATE/TECATE BICYCLE PROJECTS ................................................................................................................................................. 28 FIGURE 1.7 CALEXICO WEST/MEXICALI I PEDESTRIAN, TRANSIT, AND VEHICLE PROJECTS............................................................ 31 FIGURE 1.8 CALEXICO WEST/MEXICALI I BICYCLE PROJECTS ........................................................................................................................ 32 FIGURE 1.9 CALEXICO EAST/MEXICALI II PEDESTRIAN, TRANSIT, AND VEHICLE PROJECTS ............................................................ 35 FIGURE 1.10 CALEXICO EAST/MEXICALI II BICYCLE PROJECTS ...................................................................................................................... 36 FIGURE 1.11 ANDRADE/LOS ALGODONES PEDESTRIAN, TRANSIT, AND VEHICLE PROJECTS ........................................................ 39 FIGURE 1.12 ANDRADE/LOS ALGODONES BICYCLE PROJECTS ..................................................................................................................... 40 FIGURE 2.1 CALIFORNIA/BAJA CALIFORNIA PORTS OF ENTRY ..................................................................................................................... 43 FIGURE 4.1 SAN YSIDRO/PUERTA MÉXICO-EL CHAPARRAL POE REGIONAL MAP ................................................................................ 63 FIGURE 4.2 SAN YSIDRO/PUERTA MÉXICO-EL CHAPARRAL POE MAP .......................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CBX Case Study
    C A SE S TUDY | CROSS BORDER XPRESS (CBX) Maximizing Airport Operational Efficiency The Challenge The international border between the United States and Mexico is the most frequently crossed border in the world. In total, there are 48 U.S.-Mexico border crossings with 330 ports of entry. Cross Border Xpress (CBX) is a terminal located in San Diego, California, with a 390-foot pedestrian bridge connecting it to the Tijuana International Airport in Tijuana, Mexico. It provides easy and direct access for ticketed passengers from the U.S. side to clear Mexican immigration and catch their flight at the Tijuana airport, and for passengers arriving in Tijuana to cross into U.S. Cross Border Express at a Glance customs and exit on the U.S. side. SAFR anonymous video analytics helps improve airport operational efficiency. CBX is open 24 hours a day, and with more than a million passengers crossing each year, it is important to ensure Location: Tijuana, Mexico – both a safe and efficient passenger experience, and a San Diego, CA, USA secure border crossing. CBX needed a real-time automated solution that could count the number of Deployment Type: Anonymous video analytics people crossing, track the time it takes to cross from one Features: People counting, traversal time end of the bridge to the next, and identify any irregularity analysis, mask detection in passenger flow in order to alert security and operations personnel to potential safety problems, Use Cases: Real-time anonymous video unauthorized movement, or inefficiencies. analytics The SAFR Solution on live video feeds, in motion, under poor lighting condi- To address CBX’s need for actionable, real-time analytics, tions, and even partially obscured.
    [Show full text]
  • Caso Los Algodones, Baja California, México
    Vocación en el Turismo de Salud: Caso Los Algodones, Baja California, México Vocação no turismo de saúde: Caso Los Algodones, Baja California, México Vocation in Health Tourism: Case Los Algodones, Baja California, México Sonia Guadalupe Zermeño Flores1 Tomás Jesús Cuevas Contreras2 Resumo: Os destinos turísticos têm um conjunto de atrações que atuam como gatilhos para o fluxo de visitantes de uma região, que determinam sua vocação, juntamente com a cooperação de diferentes agentes ou atores, públicos e privados. Portanto, a presente investigação constitui um estudo de abordagem descritivo qualitativo, cujo objetivo é avaliar se a cidade de Los Algodones (LAL), Baja California, México, possui as condições de uma vocação turística que lhe permite desenvolver-se como destino estratégico no turismo de saúde sob a perspectiva de elementos essenciais como demanda, oferta, atração turística, infraestrutura e superestrutura. Para tanto, foram realizadas tabelas de consulta com os atores do turismo, cujas intervenções foram transcritas e analisadas no software de análise qualitativa Atlas.ti, identificando a vocação turística na área da saúde do território sob a ação conjunta de atores e partes interessadas da localidade que atua no desenvolvimento competitivo dessa atividade econômica. Palavras Chave: vocação turística; sistema turístico; turismo de saúde. Resumen: Los destinos turísticos poseen un conjunto de atractivos que actúan como detonantes del flujo de visitantes a una región, mismos que determinan su vocación, aunados a la acción de cooperación de los distintos agentes o actores, tanto públicos y privados. Por consiguiente, la presente investigación constituye un estudio descriptivo de corte cualitativo, cuyo objeto es valorar si la ciudad de Los Algodones (LAL), Baja California, México, posee las condiciones de vocación turística que le permita desarrollarse como un destino estratégico en turismo de salud desde la perspectiva de elementos esenciales como la demanda, oferta, atractivo turístico, infraestructura y superestructura.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Quality Planning and Transportation Conformity
    Appendix C: Air Quality Planning and Transportation Conformity Draft for Public Review May 2021 Appendix C: Air Quality Planning and Transportation Conformity Executive Summary The San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), as the region’s Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), must make a transportation air quality conformity determination for regional transportation plans (RTPs) and regional transportation improvement programs (RTIPs). The purpose of transportation conformity is to ensure that federally funded or approved activities are consistent with the State Implementation Plan (SIP). This ensures that no transportation activities will cause or contribute to new air quality violations, worsen existing violations, or delay the attainment of any relevant National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). This report documents a demonstration of conformity for the 2008 and 2015 Ozone NAAQS for San Diego Forward: The 2021 Regional Plan (2021 Regional Plan) and the 2021 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (2021 RTIP), as amended. The 2021 Regional Plan serves as the region’s Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). Background The federal Clean Air Act (CAA), which was last amended in 1990, requires the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) to set NAAQS for pollutants considered harmful to public health and the environment. California has adopted state air quality standards that are more stringent than the NAAQS.1 Areas with levels that violate the standard for specified pollutants are designated as nonattainment areas. The U.S. EPA requires that each state containing nonattainment areas develop and adopt plans to attain the NAAQS by a specified attainment deadline. These attainment plans are called SIPs. The San Diego County Air Pollution Control District (SDAPCD), in collaboration with California Air Resources Board (CARB), prepares the San Diego portion of the California SIP.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from San Diego's Border Wall
    RESEARCH REPORT (CBP Photo/Mani Albrecht) LESSONS FROM SAN DIEGO'S BORDER WALL The limits to using walls for migration, drug trafficking challenges By Adam Isacson and Maureen Meyer December 2017 " The border doesn’t need a wall. It needs better-equipped ports of entry, investi- gative capacity, technology, and far more ability to deal with humanitarian flows. In its current form, the 2018 Homeland Security Appropriations bill is pursuing a wrong and wasteful approach. The ex- perience of San Diego makes that clear." LESSONS FROM SAN DIEGO'S BORDER WALL December 2017 | 2 SUMMARY The prototypes for President Trump's proposed border wall are currently sitting just outside San Diego, California, an area that serves as a perfect example of how limited walls, fences, and barriers can be when dealing with migration and drug trafficking challenges. As designated by stomsCu and Border Protection, the San Diego sector covers 60 miles of the westernmost U.S.-Mexico border, and 46 of them are already fenced off. Here, fence-building has revealed a new set of border challenges that a wall can’t fix. The San Diego sector shows that: • Fences or walls can reduce migration in urban areas, but make no difference in rural areas. In densely populated border areas, border-crossers can quickly mix in to the population. But nearly all densely populated sections of the U.S.-Mexico border have long since been walled off. In rural areas, where crossers must travel miles of terrain, having to climb a wall first is not much of a deterrent. A wall would be a waste of scarce budget resources.
    [Show full text]
  • “Inside Was Not the Typical Sterile, Pristine, Class-A Office Space That
    DENTAL INSURANCE “Like many people, we don’t carry dental insurance. So when my husband Mark’s unusual primary tooth, which had not fallen during his childhood, suddenly began to chip apart in his mouth at age 53, we were afraid we were in for a big headache.” By Emily Fagan #99408 The last time I had gotten a crown, some five years earlier, it had cost well over they go to, my wife found out this guy $1,000 (of which my insurer covered only half). It would also be a frustrating received the most references.” procedure for us as travelers because it would mean getting an impression for the I looked at the card skeptically, won- crown, being fitted with a temporary, waiting several weeks for the lab to fabricate dering how to get there, what happens a permanent crown and then returning for a second visit to have it installed. if things go wrong and why so many We were boondocking with the Escapees Boondockers Birds of a Feather group people were so emphatic that dentistry just outside Yuma, Arizona, at the time, and we began asking the seasoned full- in Mexico is topnotch. time RVers what they did about dental work on the road. Almost unanimously we were told: We go to Mexico! Feeling Daring The next day we decided to give it a try. hat? Going to Mexico for dental ent dentists south of the border began We drove to San Luis, Arizona, the U.S. Wwork sounded extremely risky. to trickle in. town that borders San Luis, Mexico, We have both had enough sub-par dental One friend had a stack of business and parked the car in a dusty parking work over the years in our own backyards cards for a dentist in nearby San Luis lot near the border crossing.
    [Show full text]
  • Opportunities for Regional Collaboration on the Border: Sharing the European Border Experience with the San Diego/Tijuana Region
    Opportunities for Regional Collaboration on the Border: Sharing the European border experience with the San Diego/Tijuana region Dr. Freerk Boedeltje, Institute for Regional Studies of the Californias, San Diego State University, May 2012 How to read this white paper? This white paper highlights best practices and barriers for local cross border cooperation across the European Union and will suggest policy options relevant to the San Diego-Tijuana region. The research done in Europe has been carried out as part of two large scheme EU wide projects sponsored under the 5th and 6th framework Programme of European Commission. Code named EXLINA and EUDIMENSIONS, the research consisted of a consortium of multiple universities across the European Union and took 8 years between 2002 and 2009. Both project have sought to understand the actual and potential role of cross border co-operation beyond the external borders of the EU and focused on specific local development issues, including economic development, cultural and educational matters, urban development, local democracy and environmental issues. The research was designed to address practical aspects of cross-border co- operation across and beyond the external borders of the European Union. The case studies that covered most part of the external borders of the EU centred on how changes within Europe’s political space are being interpreted and used by actors with a stake in bi-national/cross-border cooperation. This whitepaper compares and contrast the San Diego-Tijuana realities with cross border cooperation in border regions of the European Union. In addition to improving our understanding how local border regions function within a global context, the whitepaper highlight best practices and barriers for local cross border cooperation and will suggest policy options relevant to the San Diego Region and the Tijuana Tecate and Playas de Rosarito Metropolitan Zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Vier Portillo
    No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 444444444444444444444444U JAVIER PORTILLO, Petitioner, - v - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. 4444444444444444444444444U PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT 4444444444444444444444444U ELIZABETH A. MISSAKIAN P.O. Box 601879 San Diego, CA 92160 (619) 233-6534 Counsel for Petitioner JAVIER PORTILLO LIST OF PARTIES [X All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. [] All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. - prefix - QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the Ninth Circuit’s analysis of the facts was inadequate and whether, when the entirety of facts presented at trial was considered, there was sufficient evidence that petitioner Javier Portillo had knowledge of narcotics hidden in his vehicle at the time he crossed the border from Mexico into the United States. - prefix - TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES.. iii OPINION BELOW. 1 JURISDICTION. 2 CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS. 2 STATEMENT OF THE CASE . 2 STATEMENT OF FACTS. 3 Government’s Case-in-Chief. 3 Defense Case. 8 Testimony of Javier Portillo. 9 REASON TO GRANT THE WRIT. 11 THERE WAS INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE FOR THE JURY TO CONCLUDE THAT JAVIER PORTILLO KNEW OF THE PRESENCE OF NARCOTICS WITHIN HIS VEHICLE WHEN HE CROSSED INTO THE UNITED STATES AT THE SAN YSIDRO PORT OF ENTRY.. 12 A. The Claim is Preserved.. 12 B. Standard of Review . 12 C. Evidence at Trial Was Insufficient to Prove Beyond a Reasonable Doubt that Javier Portillo Knew There Were Narcotics in his Vehicle.
    [Show full text]
  • Yuma Visitor Survey: Characteristics and Economic Impacts of Hotel Visitors
    Yuma Visitor Survey: Characteristics and Economic Impacts of Hotel Visitors Ashley Kerna Dari Duval George Frisvold COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE & LIFE SCIENCES Cooperative Extension Yuma Visitor Survey: Characteristics and Economic Impacts of Hotel Visitors Ashley Kerna, Dari Duval, and George Frisvold June 2016 COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE & LIFE SCIENCES Cooperative Extension © 2016 The Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, The University of Arizona. Any products, services or organizations that are mentioned, shown or indirectly implied in this publication do not imply endorsement by The University of Arizona. Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Jeffrey C. Silvertooth, Associate Dean & Director, Extension & Economic Development, College of Agriculture Life Sciences, The University of Arizona. The University of Arizona is an equal opportunity, affirmative action institution. The University does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, veteran status, or sexual orientation in its programs and activities. Table of Contents Acknowledgments 5 9 Discussion 29 Executive Summary 6 Appendix A: Research Methods 30 What is the issue? 6 Survey Methods 30 What did the study find? 6 Economic Impact Analysis Methods 30 How was the study conducted? 6 Appendix B: Survey Instrument 32 1 Introduction 9 Appendix C: Visitor Open-Ended Responses 36 2 Survey Response Rates 10 Do you plan to return to Yuma in the future? Why or 2.1 Response Rates by Participating Hotel 10 why not? 36 2.2 Response Rates by Month 10 Please let us know how your stay in Yuma could have been made better.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Medical Migration
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Medical Migration: Strategies for Affordable Care in an Unaffordable System A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology by Jennifer Catherine Miller-Thayer December 2010 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Juliet McMullin, Co-Chairperson Dr. Carlos Velez-Ibanez, Co-Chairperson Dr. Thomas C. Patterson Dr. Christine Gailey Copyright by Jennifer Catherine Miller-Thayer 2010 The Dissertation of Jennifer Catherine Miller-Thayer is approved: Committee Co-Chairperson Committee Co-Chairperson University of California, Riverside AKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am grateful to UC-MEXUS, the Ernesto Galarza Applied Research Center (EGARC), the University of California, Riverside Humanities Grant, University of California, Riverside Anthropology Department and the Eugene Cota-Robles Fellowship for providing financial support through grants, fellowships and wages. I would like to thank Juliet McMullin, Carlos Velez-Ibanez, Thomas C. Patterson, Christine Gailey, Michael Kearney, Jim Bell, Joye Sage, Andrea Kaus, Martha Ponce, Kara Oswood, Professor Shea, Augustine J. Kposowa, Kathy Sorenson, Alison Lee, Darcy Wiewall, Alison and Ira Lipsky, Deanna Brewer, Carmen, Dr. Lopez, Dr. Mendez and Dra. Arreola, Dr. Quintero, Jorge Arrendondo, Dr. Valdez-Hernandez, Dr. Ceja, Loreen, Lisa, Joe, my husband Thomas Thayer Senior and our children, all of my family, and the Transnational Medical Consumers, community members, medical personnel and care providers in Los Algodones
    [Show full text]
  • Gateway Parking
    GATEWAY PARKING STABILIZED INCOME INVESTMENT OFFERING MEMORANDUM INVESTMENT ADVISORS CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT JOSEPH LISING The information contained in the following offering memorandum is proprietary Managing Director and strictly confidential. It is intended to be reviewed only by the party receiving it Irvine Office from Cushman & Wakefield and it should not be made available to any other person +1 949 372 4896 Direct or entity without the written consent of Cushman & Wakefield. By taking possession +1 949 474 0405 Fax [email protected] of and reviewing the information contained herein the recipient agrees to hold and Lic. 01248258 treat all such information in the strictest confidence. The recipient further agrees that recipient will not photocopy or duplicate any part of the offering memorandum. If you have no interest in the subject property now, please return this offering memorandum to Cushman & Wakefield. This offering memorandum has been prepared to provide summary, unverified financial and physical information to prospective purchasers, and to establish only a preliminary level of interest in the subject property. The information contained herein is not a substitute for a thorough due diligence investigation. Cushman & Wakefield has not made any investigation, and makes no warranty or representation with respect to the income or expenses for the subject property, the future projected financial performance of the property, the size and square footage of the property and improvements, the presence or absence of contaminating substances, PCBs or asbestos, the compliance with local, state and federal regulations, the physical condition of the improvements thereon, or the financial condition or business prospects of any tenant, or any tenant’s plans or intentions to continue its occupancy of the subject property.
    [Show full text]
  • Periférico Aeropuerto-Zapata-Doble Piso a Playas”
    PRIMERA ETAPA DE LA VIALIDAD “PERIFÉRICO AEROPUERTO-ZAPATA-DOBLE PISO A PLAYAS” MEMORIA TÉCNICA Memoria Técnica Página 1 de 134 INDICE 1. INTRODUCCIÓN .................................................................................................... 6 2. CARACTERIZACIÓN DEL TERRITORIO ........................................................... 8 2.1. Localización ........................................................................................................ 8 2.2. Extensión ............................................................................................................ 8 2.3. Orografía ............................................................................................................. 9 2.4. Hidrografía ........................................................................................................ 10 2.5. Marco Geológico Regional ............................................................................... 10 2.5.1. Ambiente tectónico ............................................................................................. 10 2.5.2. Litología regional ................................................................................................. 11 2.6. Principales infraestructuras viales .................................................................... 12 3. ESTADO ACTUAL DE LA VÍA DE LA JUVENTUD ORIENTE ...................... 15 4. PROYECTO GEOMÉTRICO DE LA AUTOPISTA ............................................. 19 4.1. Objetivo ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2.1 Description of Border Function
    TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................2 1.2 COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT .........................................................................................................4 1.3 EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS AND ASSESSMENT ......................................................................................4 1.4 PROGRAMMED IMPROVEMENTS AND FUTURE CONDITIONS .............................................................................5 1.5 ORIGIN AND DESTINATION SURVEY RESULTS ..................................................................................................5 1.6 RECOMMENDED PROJECTS .................................................................................................................................5 1.7 FUNDING STRATEGY AND VISION .....................................................................................................................7 2.0 INTRODUCTION 8 2.1 DESCRIPTION OF BORDER FUNCTION ...............................................................................................................9 2.2 DEMOGRAPHIC DATA ...................................................................................................................................... 12 2.3 CROSSING AND WAIT TIME SUMMARIES ......................................................................................................... 14 2.4 ENVIRONMENTAL, HEALTH,
    [Show full text]