DOCSLIB.ORG

Conquerors of the Nuclear Icebreaker of Ice Fleet

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Conquerors of the Nuclear Icebreaker of Ice Fleet MAGAZINE OF THE UNITED SHIPBUILDING CORPORATION №3 (39) 2019 FEATURE ONE 60 YEARS CONQUERORS OF THE NUCLEAR ICEBREAKER OF ICE FLEET The hearT Colossus's GuidinG of a naval power anniversary srTa ADMIRALTY SHIPYARDS MARKS 80 YEARS OF THE GRAND 65TH ANNIVERSARY OF RUSSIA'S THE 315TH ANNIVERSARY PROJECT SEVMASH LEADING SHIPBUILDER p. 05 p. 10 p. 26 YEARS YEARS SINCE THE ESTABLISHMENT OF ADMIRALTY SHIPYARDS SINCE THE ESTABLISHMENT OF SEVMASH PRESIDENT’S COLUMN A YEAR OF GRAND ACHIEVEMENTS The departing year marked numerous grand changes. USC’s enterprises gained invaluable experience and expertise, having expanded the range of their products Plant laid down the innovative small research vessel Pioner-M, featuring a composite hull. Also, laid down at Admiralty Shipyards was the ice-resistant self-propelled platform Severny Polus (Russian for Northern Pole) signifying yet another step in the Arctic exploration. This said, USC still makes it a priority to attend to the state armament procurement program. This year saw the anniversaries of several key defense facilities in Russia, including Admiralty Shipyards, Sevmash, and Zvezdochka. Each of them makes a hefty contribution to Russia’s defense potential and development of domestic shipbuilding. Admiralty Shipyards floated out an Ivan Papanin- class ice-capable patrol ship and conducted tests of the Project 636.3 diesel-electric submarine Petropavlovsk-Kamchatski. Severnaya Verf built and tested the Project 22350 frigate Admiral of the Fleet Kasatonov and Project 20385 corvette Gremyashchy. Yantar and Sevmash are in the middle of trials of uilt at the Baltic Shipyard, the Academician the Project 11711 large landing ship Peter Morgunov Lomonosov floating power unit became and nuclear submarine Knyaz Vladimir respectively. a breakthrough equally in the shipbuilding Efforts are apace at the Sredne-Nevskiy Shipyard and energy sectors. Her delivery to to build a range of Project 12700 minesweepers, the customer this year marked a significant while the Amur Shipbuilding Plant laid down four milestone in the life of the enterprise and small missile ships and floated out the Project 20380 Bcorporation. Naturally, such platforms, facing good corvette Aldar Tsidenzhapov. These are just export prospective, will fit in Russia’s future just fine. few hallmarks in the implementation of the state A 20-year stagnation spell in Russia’s fishing armament procurement program this year. shipbuilding was broken by the Project SK-3101R lead USC spares no effort to contribute to ship Leninets, built at Yantar. The Vyborg Shipyard, the prosperity of our Fatherland and jumps at every as well as other facilities, traditionally catering to chance to let Russia maintain its status of a naval the needs of the Navy, Severnaya Verf shipbuilding power. plant and Admiralty Shipyards among them, also I sincerely congratulate our strong and solid contribute to the trend, constructing advanced team of shipbuilders on the accomplishments trawlers and long-liners. of the departing year and wish all and every Another significant development came through in member of the corporation health, wealth, and new the cruise ship sector. Despite the fact that they had professional achievements! to start almost from scratch, USC’s shipyards already Happy New Year! construct two classes of modern and comfortable cruise ships, namely PV300 and PKS 180 Golden Ring. Finally, science was a buzzword in USC throughout the year referring to both fundamental and applied Alexei L. Rakhmanov aspects shaping the most advanced shipbuilding technologies. The Sredne-Nevskiy Shipbuilding President of the United Shipbuilding Corporation №3 (39) 2019 USC / 1 P. 4 A FLEET OF A STRONG NATION P. 18 ICEBERG PROJECT P. 30 EXTRAORDINARY MISSIONS Protection of Russia’s interests Technologies OF SPECIAL SHIPS in the world ocean for the exploration Zvezdochka’s endeavor and extraction to build Project 20180 P. 5 315 YEARS IN SERVICE of hydrocarbons special purpose vessels, OF THE FATHERLAND in permanent ice zones designed by the Almaz Central Admiralty Shipyards, St. Petersburg’s oldest Maritime Design Bureau shipbuilder celebrates its anniversary P. 22 SMALL CARRIER WITH A GREAT P. 32 NEW AGE OF SHIPBUILDING P. 10 NORTHERN COLOSSUS POTENTIAL Sector’s global Sevmash, Russia’s oldest shipyard Urgency to design development trends celebrates its 80th anniversary and build a relatively compact carrier P. 34 HIS SHIPS P. 16 PRICING AND PRICE COMPETITION The biography of Georgy IN SHIPBUILDING P. 26 YAGRA’S Chernishev, an outstanding Analysis of USC’s major indicators SHIPBUILDERS chief designer of St. Petersburg’s in the past five years Zvezdochka’s history Marine Design Bureau "Malachite" Magazine of the United ShiPBUiLding CoRPoRation №3 (39) 2019 feature one 60 years Conquerors of the nuClear iCebreaker of iCe fleet The hearT Colossus's GuidinG of a naval power anniversary sTar admiralty shipyards marks 80 years of the grand 65th anniversary of russia's the 315th anniversary projeCt sevmash leading shipbuilder p. 05 p. 10 p. 26 JSC ‘USC’ JOURNAL. Circulation: 999 pieces Address: 115184, Moscow, Bolshaya Tatarskaya str. 11. JSC ‘USC’ President: Alexei Rakhmanov. www.aoosk.ru Chief Editor: Aliya Karimova. Executive Editor: Maria Arsenieva. Design and layout: “KLIMOV DESIGN STUDIO”. Tel.: +7 (499) 740-60-18. www.klimov-design.ru The opinion of authors may not coincide with the position of the editorial board. Cover: Photos for the collage sourced from www.shutterstock.com P. 38 SCIENTIFIC BREAKTHROUGH TO THE SOUTHERN HEMISPHERE Comprehensive Antarctic Expedition of the USSR Academy of Sciences P. 44 TO THE 60TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE NUCLEAR ICEBREAKER FLEET The pride of Russia’s shipbuilding P. 46 GRAVITY POLE A round table held in acknowledgment of the 60th anniversary of the Nuclear Icebreaker Fleet P. 48 TIME TO COLLECT KNOWLEDGE Corporate knowledge management system in operation P. 50 EMBASSY OF SHIPBUILDING USC’s Demonstration Center on the premises of Patriot P. 52 SHOWING RUSSIA STRONG Interview with artist Zinaida Yusova FUNDAMENTAL STRATEGIC SECURITY Close cooperation between the Navy’s supreme command and USC’s management largely predetermined successful accomplishment of a number of important objectives. For the first time, a strategic nuclear submarine successfully launched four Bulava ballistic missiles at the Kura range. The Russian Navy’s aviation and naval forces held the Ocean Shield exercise in the Mediterranean Sea. During the mastering of a deep-sea diving system, installed on state-of-the-art rescue ship Igor Belousov, rescue teams of the Pacific Fleet set another record of submergence depth. Finally, in 2017–2018, for the first time in modern Russian history, St. Petersburg saw the Main Naval Parade, which was reviewed by the Supreme Commander-in-Chief. It involved surface ships, A Fleet of submarines, and aircraft of all Russian fleets and the Caspian Flotilla. Oceanographic research vessel Admiral a Strong Nation Vladimirsky restored the practice of round- the-world voyages and performed large-scale studies of the World Ocean. Training ship Perekop, The Russian Navy is a crucial element of the country’s with cadets on board, performed a round-the-world national security system. In peacetime, it defends voyage and sailed through the Arctic waters of Russia’s interests in the World Ocean, maintaining the Northern Sea Route without icebreaker support. The renewal of the Russian fleet keeps going military and political stability on global and regional quite intensively. Under the state arms program, levels. In wartime, it repulses the aggression coming the Navy is due to receive more than 180 warships. from seas and oceans This year alone, the Navy is to receive dozens of combat ships and support vessels. The share of new and upgraded weapon systems in the inventory of VLADIMIR KOROLYOV the Russian Navy has also increased. And the total USC Vice-President, time in operation of ships and submarines has Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Navy from 2016 through 2019, Admiral exceeded 5,000 operating days! This was achieved thanks to both the manufacturers of reliable naval equipment and those who operated it with superb professionalism. In the current year, the priority for the Navy and ussian shipbuilders and naval the United Shipbuilding Corporation is to complete officers clearly understand our goal, trials of dock landing ship Pyotr Morgunov, frigate which is to set up a Navy featuring Admiral Kasatonov, corvette Gremyashchy, and a well-balanced composition a series of mine countermeasure vessels. R and cutting-edge equipment. The Navy command will continue to work hand Several lines of development have been defined in hand with defense companies on such projects in the state arms program. The primary goals as serial construction of large-displacement ships; are to uphold proper combat potential of strategic improvement of the Project 1155 anti-submarine naval nuclear forces by constructing the Borei- guided missile destroyers; and repair and refit class ballistic missile submarines, as well as to of heavy nuclear-powered guided missile cruiser build up the combat capability of general-purpose Admiral Nakhimov and aircraft carrier Admiral naval forces by making ships for ocean and sea Kuznetsov. (long- and short-range) operations. In addition, Of course, the Navy will continue to keep an eye we must upgrade the ships that have a significant on the construction of the Project 636.3 submarines potential in these aspects, reinforce naval aviation for the Pacific Fleet and the Lada-class submarines. with modern aircraft, and supply coastal missile Continuous development of the fleet is a fair systems to the Coastal Troops of the Russian need, which has been proven by the entire Navy. It is also important to establish strategic history of Russia. For a country that has access non-nuclear deterrence forces, made up of ships to 12 seas and three oceans and whose maritime carrying long-range precision weapons; modernize borders are twice as long as the land ones, it’s Navy bases; and ensure balanced supplies a must to maintain, build, and develop a Navy, of armament and ammunition.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Russia's Policy on Strengthening the Navy and the Defense Industry*
    Russia’s Policy on Strengthening the Navy and the Defense Industry* Yoshiaki Sakaguchi** Abstract The Russian government has begun rebuilding the Russian Navy as a part of the military reforms since October 2008. The Russian leadership has set out a clear policy on strengthening the Navy. Furthermore, the “State Weapons Program for 2011-2020,” unveiled at the end of 2010, presents that 23.4% of the total budget will be allocated to the procurement and development of vessels. This program and the budgetary measures for its realization have contributed to the gradual progress in the construction of new naval vessels since 2011. Nevertheless, the problems confronting the Russian defense industry remain unresolved, putting into question the ability of the defense industry to meet the high procurement targets identified in the State Weapons Program. Introduction A large-scale military reform has been under way in Russia since October 2008, with the focus of reform now shifting to modernization of obsolete armament following the near-completion of organizational and structural reform. The replacement and modernization of armament have been undertaken on the basis of the “State Weapons Program for 2011-2020” (hereinafter referred to as the “current State Weapons Program”), formulated in late 2010. The reform to equip the armed forces with a high degree of mobility and professionalism as well as the latest equipment is gradually beginning to take shape. Under these circumstances, the Navy is emerging out of the battered state that ensued after the collapse of the Soviet Union. The building of new naval vessels that had been stagnant for some time and their introduction into the Navy can be seen again.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Review of Nuclear Technology As the Advanced Ships Propulsion
    Asian Journal of Applied Sciences (ISSN: 2321 – 089) Volume 04 – Issue 03, June 2016 Technical Review of Nuclear Technology as the Advanced Ships Propulsion 1M. Badrus Zaman, 2Hadi Prasutiyon, 1Hari Prastowo and 1*Semin 1Departement of Marine Engineering, Faculty of Marine Technology Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya 60111, Indonesia 2Marine Technology Graduate Program, Faculty of Marine Technology Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya 60111, Indonesia *Corresponding author’s email: semin [AT] its.ac.id _________________________________________________________________________________ ABSTRACT--- Advance Ships Propulsion Nuclear Technology as The Answered. With the development of technology, the need for breakthrough in the of Maritime, especially the advance ship propulsion. Results : There have been more reactor concepts investigated in the naval propulsion area by different manufactures and laboratories than in the civilian field, and much can be learned from their experience for land applications. Conclusion: For these two considerations, it is recognized that a nuclear reactor is the ideal engine for naval advanced propulsion Keywords--- Advanced ship propulsion, diesel engine as an prime mover, nuclear technology _________________________________________________________________________________ 1. INTRODUCTION Marine transport has generally been seen as having a lower environmental impact than other forms of transport. The increasing demand for economical yet rapid movement of both passengers and freight has brought renewed momentum to the development of marine propulsion systems. New technologies are aiding the production of propulsion systems that are capable of driving vessels at higher speeds; that are more efficient; that provide better maneuverability; and are quieter, with less vibration. Here, the latest developments in marine propulsion are brought into focus [1]. Mechanical transmission from energy source to thruster, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • SBX Sourcebook, Volume II
    An SBX Sourcebook, Volume II Version of 2012-05-13 Additional information for this sourcebook would be welcome. Please send it to [email protected] SBX ballasted down in stable “semi-submerged” operating position SBX-1 fully afloat and under way http://www.indeed.com/salary/q-Shift-Security-Lead-Sbx-l-Adak,-AK.html http://marinetraffic.com/ais/ Accessed 2012-05-11T14:32Z http://hosted.ap.org/specials/interactives/documents/nas_response.pdf April 30, 2012 Representative Michael R. Turner Chairman, Strategic Forces Subcommittee House Armed Services Committee Representative Loretta Sanchez Ranking Member House Armed Services Committee Dear Mr. Turner and Ms. Sanchez: We are pleased to provide the following responses to the twelve (12) questions you raised to us in your April 20 letter. Before doing so, however, it is appropriate to make clear that our responses are unclassified as you requested (i.e., some specific details have been omitted to avoid making this letter classified). Furthermore, our responses are based on the briefing we provided to your subcommittee on April 18, as well as the work of a National Research Council (NRC) committee1 which we co-chaired and helped prepare the NRC report entitled Making Sense of Ballistic Missile Defense: An Assessment of Concepts and Systems for U.S. Boost-Phase Missile Defense in Comparison to Other Alternatives which is undergoing final security classification review by the Missile Defense Agency (MDA). It is also appropriate to make clear that the committee examined ballistic missile defense (BMD) for the following limited missions for defense against attacks that could plausibly be mounted by “rogue states” in the next decade or so: (1) protection of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Postgraduate School Thesis
    NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS A STUDY OF THE RUSSIAN ACQUISITION OF THE FRENCH MISTRAL AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT WARSHIPS by Patrick Thomas Baker June 2011 Thesis Advisor: Mikhail Tsypkin Second Reader: Douglas Porch Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED June 2011 Master‘s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS A Study of the Russian Acquisition of the French Mistral Amphibious Assault Warships 6. AUTHOR(S) Patrick Thomas Baker 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Naval Postgraduate School REPORT NUMBER Monterey, CA 93943-5000 9. SPONSORING /MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING N/A AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Global Submarine Market 2014–2024
    The Global Submarine Market 2014–2024 The Global Submarine Market 2014–2024 Report Price: US$4,800 (Single User) 1 The Global Submarine Market 2014–2024 Summary “The Global Submarine Market 2014–2024” offers the reader detailed analysis of the global submarine market over the next ten years, and provides market size forecasts. It covers the key technological and market trends in the submarine market. The demand for global submarines is anticipated to be driven by growing regional tensions, coupled with maritime conflicts. The new technological advancements in the sector will also drive demand. The market is expected to be dominated by North America, followed by Asia Pacific and Europe. In spite of the budget sequestration measures, the US still has the highest spend in the sector and is almost equal to the spending in Asia-Pacific, which is the second largest spending region. Asia Pacific is the second largest market for submarines with major spenders in the region including China, India, Australia and Japan. “The Global Submarine Market 2014–2024” provides detailed analysis of the current industry size and growth expectations from 2014 to 2024, including highlights of key growth stimulators. It also benchmarks the industry against key global markets and provides a detailed understanding of emerging opportunities in specific areas. Key Findings A major finding in the report entails that the sector demand will be largely driven by increase in maritime security threats and need for replacement of obsolete submarines; leading to consistent growth in the market. The demand for submarines is also anticipated to be driven by the need for the balance of power by countries with major militaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Akademik Lomonosov – the First Modern Floating Nuclear
    Russia’s Akademik Lomonosov – The First Modern Floating Nuclear Power Plant (FNPP) Peter Lobner, 15 May 2021 1. Introduction Designated Project 20870, construction of Akademik Lomonosov started on 15 April 2007, when the keel was laid at the Sevmash shipyard in Severodvinsk, which also is Russia’s premier submarine building shipyard. Originally, Akademik Lomonosov was expected to supply power to the Sevmash shipyard itself and the town of Severodvinsk, in Northwest Russia. Cutaway drawing showing the general arrangement of the Akademik Lomonosov. Source: Rosatom In August 2008, the hull of Akademik Lomonosov was transferred to the Baltic Shipyard in St. Petersburg, where a second “keel laying” was held in May 2009. Plans for deploying the FNPP were reconsidered, leading to the final selection of Pevek, a remote Arctic coastal city in Russia’s Far East. The FNPP was launched on 30 June 2010 and outfitting continued with the vessel secured dockside at the Baltic Shipyard. Two un-fueled OKBM Afrikantov KLT-40S modular pressurized water reactors (PWRs) were installed in October 2013. 1 After work on the vessel and reactor systems was completed in April 2018, Akademik Lomonosov was towed 4,000 km (2,485 miles) around Norway to Murmansk, where the reactors were fuelled and tested at Rosatomflot facilities, which also support their nuclear- powered icebreaker fleet. In June 2019, the Russian nuclear regulatory agency Rostekhnadzor issued a 10-year license to Rosenergoatom to operate Akademik Lomonosov until 2029. After successfully completing testing, Akademik Lomonosov departed Murmansk on 23 August 2019 and was towed 4,770 km (2,964 miles) along the Northern Sea Route, arriving at its final destination on 9 September 2019 at a new protected pier at Pevek, which is about 980 km (609 miles) west of the Bering Strait.
    [Show full text]
  • Illllllllll DK9700033
    Nordisk Nordisk Pohjoismamen Nordic kerne- karn- ydin- nuclear sikkerheds- sakerhcts- turvallisuus- safety forskning forskning uitkimus research RAK-2 NKS/RAK-2(96)TR-C3 Illllllllll DK9700033 Accidents in Nuclear Ships P. L. 01gaard Rise National Laboratory DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark Institute of Physics Technical University of Denmark DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark December 1996 Abstract This report starts with a discussion of the types of nuclear vessels accidents, in particular accidents which involve the nuclear propulsion systems. Next available information on 61 reported nuclear ship events is considered. Of these 6 deals with U.S. ships, 54 with USSR ships and 1 with a French ship. The ships are in almost all cases nuclear submarines. Only events that involve the sinking of vessels, the nuclear propulsion plants, radiation exposures, fires/explosions, sea-water leaks into the submarines and sinking of vessels are considered. For each event a summary of available information is presented, and comments are added. In some cases the available information is not credible, and these events are neglected. This reduces the number of events to 5 U.S. events, 35 USSR/Russian events and 1 French event. A comparison is made between the reported Soviet accidents and information available on dumped and damaged Soviet naval reactors. It seems possible to obtain good correlation between the two types of events. An analysis is made of the accident and estimates are made of the accident probabilities which are found to be of the order of 10"3 per ship reactor year It is finally pointed out that the consequences of nuclear ship accidents are fairly local and does in no way not approach the magnitude of the Chernobyl accident.
    [Show full text]
  • Claude R. Joiris, Grant R. W. Humphries & Alain De Broyer
    Seabirds encountered along return transects between South Africa summer in relation to Claude R. Joiris, Grant R. W. Humphries & Alain De Broyer Polar Biology Volume 36-Number 11 -November 2013 ISSN 0722-4060 Volume 36 Number 11 Polar Biol (2013) 36:1633-1647 DOI 10.1007/S00300-013-1382-9 MiMirf'’ tp j stt <£) S p r in g e r & S p ringer Your article is protected by copyright and all rights are held exclusively by Springer- Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. This e-offprint is for personal use only and shall not be self­ archived in electronic repositories. If you wish to self-archive your article, please use the accepted manuscript version for posting on your own website. You may further deposit the accepted manuscript version in any repository, provided it is only made publicly available 12 months after official publication or later and provided acknowledgement is given to the original source of publication and a link is inserted to the published article on Springer's website. The link must be accompanied by the following text: "The final publication is available at link.springer.com". Ö Springer Author's personal copy Polar Biol (2013) 36:1633-1647 DOI 10.1007/s00300-013-1382-9 ORIGINAL PAPER Seabirds encountered along return transects between South Africa and Antarctica in summer in relation to hydrological features Claude R. Joiris • Grant R. W. Humphries • Alain De Broyer Received: 17 December 2012/Revised: 16 June 2013/Accepted: 5 August 2013/Published online: 25 August 2013 © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013 Abstract The first aim of our long-term study on the at- individuals per count; the major difference is observed in sea distribution of the upper trophic levels—seabirds and closed pack ice, almost empty in the Arctic but showing a marine mammals—in polar marine ecosystems is to iden­ very high biomass in the Antarctic.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Article in PDF Format
    E3S Web of Conferences 163, 06011 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202016306011 IV Vinogradov Conference Channel processes of a small river heavily modified by human activities Aleksandr Varenov1, Anna Tarbeeva2,*, Dmitriy Botavin2, Nadezhda Mikhaylova2, Leonid Turykin2,and Aleksandra Chalova2 1Nizhniy Novgorod State Reserve Museum of History and Architecture, 7 Verhne-Volzhskaya Emb., 603005, Nizhniy Novgorod, Russia 2Lomonosov Moscow State University, 1 Leninskiye Gory, 119991, Moscow, Russia Abstract. Widely-spread small rivers are very poorly studied in relation to channel processes. The influence of local factors, high sensitivity to human impact, close connection with basin processes, and relatively low rates of channel changes distinguish them from medium and large ones and make it necessary to form a special approach to studies. Based on collection of long-term maps and local residents’ interviews, we reconstructed the transformation of channels in the Kudma River basin (the Volga Upland) for the last 200 years. Based on the bank erosion monitoring during 2011-2019 the modern rates of channel changes were revealed. We found that significant human impact is associated with the artificial channels cutoffs and draining of ponds which led to channel incision of the Kudma and Ozerka Rivers in the middle reaches and the transformation of floodplain into terrace. Agriculture development caused siltation of the upper reaches of rivers. The rivers of the forested part of the basin experienced the least human changes. From 2011 to 2019 the maximum rates of bank erosion were found to be within range of 0.3 to 2.7 m/year and supposed to be driven by peak water discharge.
    [Show full text]
  • The Russian Northern Fleet Sources of Radioactive Contamination
    NO9600025 Bellona Report Volume 2:1996 NEI-NO--726 \ Sources of Radioactive contamination Thomas Nilsen Igor Kudrik Alexandr Nikitin BELLONA V .., I! V: NO9600025 Bellona Report Volume 2:1996 The Russian Northern Fleet Sources of Radioactive contamination Thomas Nilsen Igor Kudrik Alexandr Nikitin 2 C 1 0 1 The publication of this report is sponsored by: Stiftelsen Fritt Ord/Foundation for Freedom of Expression (Main contributor) Contributors: Norsk Hydro a.s. Petrochemicals Division NORSAS, Norwegian Resource Centre for Waste Aker ASA Management and Recycling Chemical Workers Union of Norway Norsk Sivilingeni0rers Forening Norwegian Seafood Export Council Norges ingeni0rorganisasjon (NITO) FESIL AS Green Sea Operations AS Norwegian Society of Engineers UNI STOREBRAND Confederation of Norwegian Business and Industry AGAAS WASA Forsiikring (Stockholm) OZO Hotwater A/S Norwegian Fishermen's Association Energiforsyningens Fellesorganisasjon EnFO Norwegian Federation of Oilworkers' Trade Union Store Norske Spitsbergen Kullkompani AS Norwegian Polar Institute Svalbard Samfunnsdrift AS Odda Smelteverk Norzink AS Published by: The Bellona Foundation Norway: P.O. Box 2141, Griinerl0kka N-0505 OSLO, Norway. E-mail: [email protected] Russia: Brussels: USA Russia Bellona Europa Bellona USA 183038 Murmansk 142-144 Avenue de Tervueren 310 D Street NE P.O. Box 4310 B-1150Bruxelles Washington, DC 20002 Bellona Russia Belgium USA E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] URL: Photos: Copying permitted when source is http://www.grida.no/ngo/bellona/ John Berg (archive), Thorbj0rn Bj0r- stated. kli, Per Stale Bugjerde, Nils B0hmer, ISBN 82-993138-5-6 The Norwegian Defence, Frederic Comments to this report are welco- ISSN 0806-3451 Hauge, Aleksej Klimov, Igor Kudrik, med.
    [Show full text]
  • The Organisation of Control Over Non-Centralized Water Supply Under the Risk of Groundwater Dynamics Disturbance in Karst Areas
    JOURNAL OF WATER AND LAND DEVELOPMENT e-ISSN 2083-4535 Polish Academy of Sciences (PAN), Committee on Agronomic Sciences JOURNAL OF WATER AND LAND DEVELOPMENT Section of Land Reclamation and Environmental Engineering in Agriculture 2020, No. 47 (X–XII): 113–124 Institute of Technology and Life Sciences (ITP) https://doi.org/10.24425/jwld.2020.135038 Available (PDF): http://www.itp.edu.pl/wydawnictwo/journal; http://journals.pan.pl/jwld The organisation of control over non-centralized Received 05.08.2020 Reviewed 06.08.2020 Accepted 08.09.2020 water supply under the risk of groundwater dynamics disturbance in karst areas Oleg R. KUZICHKIN 1) , Roman V. ROMANOV 2), Nikolay V. DOROFEEV 2), Anastasia V. GRECHENEVA 1), Gleb S. VASILYEV 1) 1) Belgorod National Research University, Department of Information and Robototechnic Systems, 85 Pobedy St., 308015 Belgorod, Russia 2) Vladimir State University named after A. G. and N. G. Stoletovs, Department of Management and Control in Technical Systems, Vladimir, Russia For citation: Kuzichkin O.R., Romanov R.V., Dorofeev N.V., Grecheneva A.V., Vasilyev G.S. 2020. The organisation of control over non-centralized water supply under the risk of groundwater dynamics disturbance in karst areas. Journal of Water and Land Development. No. 47 (X–XII) p. 113–124. DOI: 10.24425/jwld.2020.135038. Abstract The use of non-centralised water supply in remote settlements is currently the only possible option. Monitoring the wa- ter quality of such supply sources is a complicated task in such areas, especially when there are active karst processes and difficult groundwater conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Government Support to Upstream Oil & Gas in Russia
    GOVERNMENT SUPPORT TO UPSTREAM OIL & GAS IN RUSSIA HOW SUBSIDIES INFLUENCE THE YAMAL LNG AND PRIRAZLOMNOE PROJECTS Page i Government Support to Upstream Oil & Gas in Russia How Subsidies Influence the Yamal LNG and Prirazlomnoe Projects GENEVA-OSLO-MOSCOW JULY 2014 Lars Petter Lunden and Daniel Fjaertoft, Sigra Group PUBLISHED IN PARTNERSHIP BY: www.globalsubsidies.org GOVERNMENT SUPPORT TO UPSTREAM OIL & GAS IN RUSSIA HOW SUBSIDIES INFLUENCE THE YAMAL LNG AND PRIRAZLOMNOE PROJECTS Page ii Government Support to Upstream Oil & Gas in Russia How Subsidies Influence the Yamal LNG and Prirazlomnoe Projects Lars Petter Lunden and Daniel Fjaertoft, Sigra Group Geneva-Oslo-Moscow, July 2014 © 2014 The International Institute for Sustainable Development/WWF Published by the International Institute for Sustainable Development. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report has been commissioned by the Global Subsidies Initiative (GSI) of the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) thanks to the generous support of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Norway and Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark. The report has been prepared by Lars Petter Lunden and Daniel Fjaertoft, Sigra Group, in coordination with Ivetta Gerasimchuk, PhD in Economics, and Lucy Kitson, IISD-GSI. WWF-Russia has provided communications and outreach support for the report. This report has been peer-reviewed by: • Mikhail Babenko, PhD in Economics, Oil & Gas Officer, WWF Global Arctic Programme • James Henderson, Senior Research Fellow, Oxford Institute for Energy Studies •
    [Show full text]