Ons Agency Be 009474
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
DOCUMENT RESUME ED 148 214 BE 009474 AUTHOR Feinstein, Otto; Seaver, Frank A. T12LE4 The. Detroit Hearings. A Model for City/University Collaboration on Urban Concerns. rRSTITUTION Wayne State Univ., Detroit, Mich. Center forUrban Studies. ONS AGENCY National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C. PU DATE 77 CONT ,CT ISP76-19857 NOTE \, 188p.; ior related document tee HE 009 473; some papers may not reproduqe well AVAILABLE FROM Center for Urban Studies, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48202 EDRS PRICE MF-$0.83 HC-$10.03 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS College Role; Community- Programs; Consortia; *Consultatkpn Programs; Cooperative Planning; *Cooperative Programs; *Hearings; Higher Education; Models; *School Community Relationship; *Social Problems; Technology transfer; Urban Areas; *Urban Universities IDENTIFIERS *Michigan (Detroit); University of Michigan; Wayne State University MI ABSTRACT The Detroit Hearings are an effort at developing an additional method of collaboration between the city andthe university. The aim is to develop an environment ofcollaboration around major areas of concern out of which awide range of collaborative efforts could develop. It is both a complementand -supplement to the traditional methods of consultations, grants, contracts, and joint institutions. The Hearingsmethod is based on a collaborative-consortial arrangement, where the partners have abroad general concern and where neither the specific needs norcapability of responding are clearly defined. TheHearings were one of four elements funded through a National Science, Foundation grantgiven jointly to the City of Detroit, the University ofMichigan, and Wayne State University, for the purpose of developingconsortial means of collaboration in dealing with city problems andmaking available scientific knowledge and personnel for that purpose.This report describes how the hearings were organized, whathappened at them, and what is coming. out of that experience. A briefdescription is also included of collaborative projects resulting fromt'Ie hearings that will need funding support.(LBh1 ********************************44************************************* Documents acquired by ERIC include manyinformal unpublished * materials not available from othereburces. ERIC makes every effort * * to obtain the best copy available.Nevertheless, items of marginal * * reproducibility are often encounteredand this affects the quality * * of the microfiche and hardcopyreproductions ERIC makes available * * Via the ERIC Document ReproductionService (EDRS). EDRS is not * responsible for the quality of theoriginal document. Reproductions * * supplied by EDRS are the best that4an be made from the original. * **************1:***********************/4******************************* THE DEIRQIT HEARINGS r4 A Model' for City/University CO Collaboration on Urban Concerns r-1 U S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. EDUCATION & WELFARE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEENRE-"RO- DUCE() EXACTLY ASRECEIVED FROM THE PERSON OR ORGANIZATIONORIGIN. AT1NG IT POINTS OF VIEWOR OPINIONS STATED 00 NOT NECESSARILYREPRE. INSTITUTE OF SENT OFFICIAL NATIONAL EDUCATION POSITION ORPOLIC' "PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THIS MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY L_ TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) AND USERS OF THE ERIC SYSTEM ' A es t. Center for Urban Studies Wayne State University Detroit, Michigan 48202 THE DETROIT HEARINGS A Model for City/University Collaboration on Urban Concerns By Otto Feinstein Associate to the Vice-President For Urban Affairs and Frank A. Seaver Chairman, Conferences & Institutes McGregor Memorial Conference Center 3 This report was funded by the National Science Foundation under Contract Number ISP76-19857 Detroit, Michigan 1977 TABLE OFcouraqrs Introduction 5 7 The Hearings Process Selection of Subject Areas 7 Organization of Hearing 8, Invitation- to Participants and Public 9 Holding of the Hearings 10 Follow-Up 18 Project Proposals 18 The librkingman's Sabbatical The Humanities Institute for Working Adults 18 University Studies and Weekend College Program 20 Paid Educational Leaves 22 Neighborhoods 23 Ecology, Energy, and Environment 25 Cultural Development and Cultural Action 27 Social History as Cultural Action 29 Urban Life Cycles 31 Continuation of Hearings Structure 32 Summary and Conclusions 33 What Happened 33 What Does It Mean 34 Appendix 36 Evalution Form 37 Responses to Question 2 38 Responses to Question 7 43 The Packet Distributed at the Hearings 49 .4/ -3- INTRODUCTION The Detroit Hearings are an effort at developing an additional method of col4boration between City and University. The aim is to develop ;) environment of collaboration aroundmajor areas of cono out of which a wide range of collaborative efforts coulde'velop. It is both a complement and supplement to the traditional methods of consultations, grants, contracts, and joint instittltions. The traditional methods are generally based on a service-agency/ client relation, jhere the client has clearly defined needs and the service institution a clearly defined capability ofrespond= ing to these needs. The Hearings method is based on a collaborative-consortial arrange- ment, where the partners have a broad general concern and where neither the specific needs or capability of responding are clearly defined. The Hearings are an effort to provide the environment where needs and capabilities are clearly defined and where the issues can be joined. This is the report on these hearings. The Hearings were one of four elements funded through a National Science Foundation Grant give:. jointly to the City of Detroit, the University of Michigan, Wayne State University, for the purpose of developing consortial means ofcollaboration in dealing with city problems and making available scientific knowledge and personnel for that purpose. -5- 6 The other three elements will be described in another report. They were : First, the development of 14 policy option papers prepared by academic experts in response to a list of issues prepared by the city. Second, a survey of records and perSonnel regarding WSU-City, UoDIM-City, and City DoBA,WSU grants, contracts, and consult- ation arrange1,2nts regarding city problems over the past ten years. Third, A review of the literature dealing with University-City collaborative models and the related experience. The four activities are cathined into a report to NSF and to the participants of the four elements. The project was designed to provide immediate collaboration of City and University on a series of issues, see what the pattern and success of previous relations had been, find out what we know from the literature about collaborative models in other cities, and by means of the hearings, develop a new model of collaboration. In this report we describe how the hearings were organized, what happened at the hearings, and what is coming out of that experience. In addition we provide a brief description of collaborative projects which are coming out of the hearings and which will need funding support. We would like to thank the National Science Foundation for this unique opportunity and the prithe investigators of this project -- Anthony DiVeto, William Haber, and Ronald Haughten (for the City, University of Michigan, Wayne State University) -- Richard Simmons Jr., John Musial, Sue Smock, Mary Clayton, Ed Cushman fran the Center for Urban Studies ; Stephen Whithey of the Institute for Social Research, Larry Berlin and Bill Cave of the Department of Adult and Continuing Education of the University of Michigan; John DeWitt, Eric Fenster, James Anderson, Eric Bockstael, Chris Johnson, Richard Place, and Charles Parrish of Wayne State University; and Michael Usdan President of the Merrill-Palmer Institute , for the organizational assistance and participation without which this program would never have come about. Finally we would like to thank Wendy Seay , Gary Saganski, and Judith Strange for their critical help, and the many others who presented papers, ideas, and suggestions. -6- TRR HEARINGS PROCESS The Hearings Process consists of five (5) stages: 1. Selection of Subject Areas 2_ Organization of Hearing 3. Invitation to Participants and Public 4. Holding of the Hearing 5. Follow-Up The purpose of the hearing format should be clearly spelled out. We did this in the working papers which were given to all part- icipants and are included in the appendix. "The Hearings are an experiment designed to meet one of the major concerns arising out of the new literature dealing with City-University collaboration. Briefly stated, this concern is based on two realities the difficulty the city finds in using many urban-oriented human and material resources of the University and the difficulty the University has in organizing these resources to meet specific city needs. It is also an effort at identifying more long run areas of mutual collaboration." Selection of Subject Areas Once the idea of testing the hearing format was accepted by the consortial partners (the City of Detroit, the University of Michigan, and Wayne State University) the question was what subject areas should be selected for this format. We used the following criteria. First, areas of known concern to both University and City personnel where individual or collective collaboration was minimal; Second, areas of known concern where the hearing format might provide an environment for city and university people finding partners for consultations, grant proposals, etc., that is basically one-to-one collaboration;