DOCSLIB.ORG

MASTER/Format a Text Template

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MASTER/Format a Text Template CTTolling_Volume II:Layout 1 2/18/2009 11:01 AM Page 1 draft final report Connecticut Electronic Tolls and Congestion Pricing Study Volume 2 – Background Report prepared for Connecticut Transportation Strategy Board Connecticut Office of Policy and Management prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 100 CambridgePark Drive, Suite 400 Cambridge, Massachusetts 02140 with Urbitran, a division of DMJM Harris/AECOM IBI Group Fitzgerald & Halliday, Inc. Sam Schwartz, PLLC February 2009 Draft Final (February 2009) Connecticut Electronic Tolls and Congestion Pricing Study – Draft Final Report – Volume 2: Background Report Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background and Overview.................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Methodology.......................................................................................................... 1-4 2.0 Institutional and Legal Considerations.................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Legal Implications of Past Actions ..................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Federal Laws Related to Tolling and Congestion Pricing ............................... 2-2 2.3 Connecticut Statutes............................................................................................. 2-8 2.4 Legal and Institutional Aspects of Enforcement............................................... 2-9 2.5 Institutional Considerations................................................................................ 2-10 3.0 All Electronic Tolling – Operational and Deployment Challenges.................... 3-1 3.1 All Electronic Tolling – Operational Program Functions ................................ 3-1 3.2 All Electronic Tolling Deployment..................................................................... 3-19 4.0 Consideration of Public-Private Partnerships and Contractual Issues.............. 4-1 4.1 PPP Approaches.................................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 Institutional Considerations in Establishing a PPP Program.......................................................................................................... 4-4 4.3 Applying PPP Approaches to Projects – Theory .............................................. 4-7 5.0 Privacy ............................................................................................................................ 5-1 5.1 Issue 1 – Collection of Personal Information..................................................... 5-1 5.2 Issue 2 – Retention of Personal Information...................................................... 5-5 5.3 Issue 3 – Sharing of Personal Information with Other Parties .......................................................................................................... 5-6 6.0 Public Acceptance......................................................................................................... 6-1 7.0 Concept A – New Toll Express Lanes ....................................................................... 7-1 7.1 Institutional and Legal ......................................................................................... 7-3 7.2 Technology and Deployment .............................................................................. 7-3 7.3 Potential PPP Approaches ................................................................................... 7-5 7.4 Privacy .................................................................................................................... 7-6 7.5 Technical Analysis of Project A-1 – Express Toll Lanes: I-95 – Branford to Rhode Island .......................................................................................................... 7-6 7.6 Technical Analysis of Project A-2 – Express Toll Lanes: I-84 – Waterbury to New York State Line......................................................................................... 7-17 7.7 Technical Analysis of Project A-3 – All Projects Combined, A-1 and A-2 .... 7-23 7.8 Financial Analysis of Concept A – New Toll Express Lanes .......................... 7-24 Cambridge Systematics, Inc. i Connecticut Electronic Tolls and Congestion Pricing Study – Draft Final (February 2009) Draft Final Report – Volume 2: Background Report Table of Contents (continued) 8.0 Concept B – Border Tolling at Major Highways .................................................... 8-1 8.1 Institutional and Legal ......................................................................................... 8-3 8.2 Technology and Deployment .............................................................................. 8-5 8.3 Potential PPP Approaches ................................................................................... 8-6 8.4 Privacy .................................................................................................................... 8-7 8.5 Technical Analysis of Concept B – Border Tolling at Major Highways ........ 8-7 8.6 Financial Analysis of Concept B – Border Tolling at Major Highways......... 8-25 9.0 Concept C – Toll Trucks on Limited Access Highways.............................................. 9-1 9.1 Institutional and Legal ......................................................................................... 9-2 9.2 Technology and Deployment .............................................................................. 9-3 9.3 Potential PPP Approaches ................................................................................... 9-5 9.4 Privacy .................................................................................................................... 9-6 9.5 Technical Analysis of Concept C – Toll Trucks on Limited Access Highways ............................................................................................................... 9-6 9.6 Financial Analysis of Concept C – Toll Trucks on Limited Access Highways ............................................................................................................... 9-24 10.0 Concept D – HOV to HOT Lane Conversion .............................................................. 10-1 10.1 Institutional and Legal ......................................................................................... 10-10 10.2 Technology and Deployment .............................................................................. 10-10 10.3 Potential PPP Approaches ................................................................................... 10-11 10.4 Privacy .................................................................................................................... 10-12 10.5 Technical Analysis of Project D-1 – Interstate 84 HOT Lane .......................... 10-12 10.6 Technical Analysis of Project D-2 – Interstate 91 HOT Lane .......................... 10-21 10.7 Technical Analysis of Project D-3 – Combined HOT Lanes............................ 10-27 10.8 Financial Analysis of Concept D – HOV to HOT Lane Conversion .............. 10-28 11.0 Concept E – Convert Highway Shoulders to HOT Lanes..................................... 11-1 11.1 Institutional and Legal ......................................................................................... 11-3 11.2 Technology and Deployment .............................................................................. 11-4 11.3 Potential PPP Approaches ................................................................................... 11-4 11.4 Privacy .................................................................................................................... 11-4 11.5 Technical Analysis of Concept E – Convert Shoulders to HOT Lanes.......... 11-5 12.0 Concept F – Toll Individual Highways Needing New Capacity ......................... 12-1 12.1 Institutional and Legal ......................................................................................... 12-4 12.2 Technology and Deployment .............................................................................. 12-5 12.3 Potential PPP Approaches ................................................................................... 12-7 12.4 Privacy .................................................................................................................... 12-7 12.5 Technical Analysis of Project F-1 – Toll All Lanes of I-95 – Branford to Rhode Island State Line to Fund Improvements.............................................. 12-8 ii Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Draft Final (February 2009) Connecticut Electronic Tolls and Congestion Pricing Study – Draft Final Report – Volume 2: Background Report Table of Contents (continued) 12.6 Technical Analysis of Project F-2 – Toll All Lanes of I-84 – Waterbury to New York State Line to Fund Improvements ................................................... 12-21 12.7 Technical Analysis of Project F-3 – Projects F-1 and F-2 Combined .............. 12-30 12.8 Financial Analysis of Concept F – Toll Individual Highways Needing New Capacity ........................................................................................................ 12-32 13.0 Concept G-1 –Toll All Limited Access Highways.................................................. 13-1 13.1 Institutional and Legal ......................................................................................... 13-2 13.2 Technology and Deployment .............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Heroes Tunnel Project Route 15 Wilbur Cross Parkway State Project No
    HEROES TUNNEL PROJECT ROUTE 15 WILBUR CROSS PARKWAY STATE PROJECT NO. 167-108 PURPOSE AND NEED STATEMENT (Revised 7/3/18) PROJECT CONTEXT The Heroes Tunnel is located along the Wilbur Cross Parkway (Route 15) in the Town of Woodbridge and the City of New Haven, near the Town of Hamden border. The Heroes Tunnel is a 1,200-foot long tunnel, which passes through West Rock Ridge in New Haven and Woodbridge. The existing tunnel was constructed between spring 1948 and fall 1949 and consists of two 28-foot wide by 19-foot high barrels with horseshoe cross-sections. The northbound and southbound barrels of the tunnel consist of two 11-foot wide travel lanes with 6-inch shoulders and a 2-foot 6-inch wide raised maintenance walk on each side. The centerlines of the barrels are approximately 63 feet apart. It is the only tunnel to pass beneath a natural land feature in the State of Connecticut and is eligible for listing on both the National and State Registers of Historic Places. The Heroes Tunnel Project limits encompass the 1,200-foot tunnel and extend approximately 2,000 feet from the tunnel portals, in both the northbound and southbound directions, as illustrated in Figure 1 attached. EXISTING TRANSPORTATION NETWORK The Wilbur Cross Parkway is a limited access highway, classified as an urban principal arterial – other expressway, comprising a portion of Route 15 between Milford and Meriden where commercial vehicles, trailers, towed vehicles and buses are prohibited. As a continuation of the Merritt Parkway in Fairfield County, Route 15 is an important route between the New York City metropolitan area and central Connecticut.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case for Reconnecting Southeast Washington DC
    1 Reimagining DC 295 as a vital multi modal corridor: The Case for Reconnecting Southeast Washington DC Jonathan L. Bush A capstone thesis paper submitted to the Executive Director of the Urban & Regional Planning Program at Georgetown University’s School of Continuing Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Masters of Professional Studies in Urban & Regional Planning. Faculty Advisor: Howard Ways, AICP Academic Advisor: Uwe S. Brandes, M.Arch © Copyright 2017 by Jonathan L. Bush All Rights Reserved 2 ABSTRACT Cities across the globe are making the case for highway removal. Highway removal provides alternative land uses, reconnects citizens and natural landscapes separated by the highway, creates mobility options, and serves as a health equity tool. This Capstone studies DC 295 in Washington, DC and examines the cases of San Francisco’s Embarcadero Freeway, Milwaukee’s Park East Freeway, New York City’s Sheridan Expressway and Seoul, South Korea’s Cheonggyecheon Highway. This study traces the history and the highway removal success using archival sources, news circulars, planning documents, and relevant academic research. This Capstone seeks to provide a platform in favor DC 295 highway removal. 3 KEYWORDS Anacostia, Anacostia Freeway, Anacostia River, DC 295, Highway Removal, I-295, Kenilworth Avenue, Neighborhood Planning, Southeast Washington DC, Transportation Planning, Urban Infrastructure RESEARCH QUESTIONS o How can Washington’s DC 295 infrastructure be modified to better serve local neighborhoods? o What opportunities
    [Show full text]
  • Gregor Weichbrodt on the Road 0X0a
    0x0a On the Road Gregor Weichbrodt On the Road Gregor Weichbrodt 0x0a © 2014 Gregor Weichbrodt All rights reserved. www.ggor.de CONTENTS About this book ........................ 5 Chapter 1 ............................... 7 Chapter 2 .............................. 23 Chapter 3 .............................. 41 Chapter 4 .............................. 53 ABOUT THIS BOOK Based on the novel “On the Road” by Jack Kerouac and Google Maps Direction Service. The exact and approximate spots Kerouac traveled and described are taken from the book and parsed by Google Direction Service API. The chapters match those of the original book. Gregor Weichbrodt January 2014 www.ggor.de 7 CHAPTER 1 Head northwest on W 47th St toward 7th Ave. Take the 1st left onto 7th Ave. Turn right onto W 39th St. Take the ramp onto Lincoln Tunnel. Parts of this road are closed Mon–Fri 4:00 – 7:00 pm. Entering New Jersey. Continue onto NJ-495 W. Keep right to continue on NJ-3 W, follow signs for New Jersey 3 W/Garden State Parkway/Secaucus. Take the New Jersey 3 W exit on the left toward Clifton. Merge onto NJ-3 W. Slight right onto the Garden State Pkwy N ramp. Merge onto Garden State Pkwy. Take exit 155P on the left to merge onto NJ-19 N toward I-80/ Paterson. Turn left onto Cianci St. Turn right onto Market St. Head west on Market St toward Washington St. Turn left onto Main St. Turn right onto County Rd 509 S. Take the Interstate 80 E ramp. Merge onto I-80 E. Take exit 62A-62B toward Saddle 9 Brook/Saddle River Rd/Garden State Pkwy.
    [Show full text]
  • Mainedot Work Plan Calendar Years 2019-2020-2021 Maine Department of Transportation
    Maine State Library Digital Maine Transportation Documents Transportation 2-2019 MaineDOT Work Plan Calendar Years 2019-2020-2021 Maine Department of Transportation Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalmaine.com/mdot_docs Recommended Citation Maine Department of Transportation, "MaineDOT Work Plan Calendar Years 2019-2020-2021" (2019). Transportation Documents. 124. https://digitalmaine.com/mdot_docs/124 This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the Transportation at Digital Maine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Transportation Documents by an authorized administrator of Digital Maine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MaineDOT Work Plan Calendar Years 2019-2020-2021 February 2019 February 21, 2019 MaineDOT Customers and Partners: On behalf of the 2,000 valued employees of the Maine Department of Transportation (MaineDOT), I am privileged to present this 2019 Edition of our Work Plan for the three Calendar Years 2019, 2020 and 2021. Implementation of this plan allows us to achieve our mission of responsibly providing our customers with the safest and most reliable transportation system possible, given available resources. Like all recent editions, this Work Plan includes all capital projects and programs, maintenance and operations activities, planning initiatives, and administrative functions. This plan contains 2,193 individual work items with a total value of $2.44 billion, consisting principally of work to be delivered or coordinated through MaineDOT, but also including funding and work delivered by other transportation agencies that receive federal funds directly including airports and transit agencies. Although I have the pleasure of presenting this plan, it is really the product of staff efforts dating back to the summer of last year.
    [Show full text]
  • Brewer Rail Trail Project
    Brewer Rail Trail Project Linda Johns President, Brewer Land Trust City Planner, City of Brewer September 1, 2016 The Brewer Land Trust is excited to initiate the creation of a Rail Trail through the City of Brewer! There is an inactive, overgrown portion of railroad (part of the Calais Branch Rail Line) from Wilson Street to approximately 1,000 feet easterly of Green Point Road which is approximately 2.12 miles in length. This rail bed directly abuts a 196-space City-owned parking lot, Maple Street Park, the City’s Public Safety building, an outdoor ice rink, and valuable wetland and wildlife habitats. Within a very short walk to the rail corridor, is the Brewer High School, an indoor ice arena, Brewer Auditorium, Brewer Library, and the City’s Riverwalk trail along the Penobscot River. This potential rail trail could be used by many for both recreational purposes as well as a transportation connection to other locations. Brewer has seen many more walkers and bicyclists as has the region. The Brewer High School students currently use the roads to run, which is not always the safest. This rail trail could create a loop using Dirigo Drive and Green Point Road from the school. Both the Brewer School Department and the City of Brewer would like to see this project constructed. This potential rail trail could also be a great addition to the East Coast Greenway, which is currently on-road through this portion of Brewer. There is a large wetland owned by the State next to the rail bed on Green Point Road where a variety of animals can be seen on almost any given day creating a great location for birdwatcherst.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
    CITY OF MERIDEN CONNECTICUT COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2017 CITY OF MERIDEN, CONNECTICUT COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2017 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE MICHAEL LUPKAS, CPFO DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY OF MERIDEN TABLE OF CONTENTS JUNE 30, 2017 Introductory Section Page Letter of Transmittal i-xv GFOA Certificate of Achievement xvi Organizational Chart xvii List of Principal Officials xviii Financial Section Independent Auditors’ Report 1-3 Management’s Discussion and Analysis 4-15 Basic Financial Statements Exhibit Government-Wide Financial Statements: I Statement of Net Position 16 II Statement of Activities 17 Fund Financial Statements: III Balance Sheet - Governmental Funds 18-19 IV Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - Governmental Funds 20-21 V Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual - Budgetary Basis - General Fund 22 VI Statement of Net Position - Proprietary Funds 23 VII Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position - Proprietary Funds 24 VIII Statement of Cash Flows - Proprietary Funds 25 IX Statement of Fiduciary Net Position - Fiduciary Funds 26 X Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position - Fiduciary Funds 27 Notes to the Financial Statements 28-81 Required Supplementary Information RSI-1a Schedule of Changes in Net Pension Liability and Related Ratios - City 82 RSI-1b Schedule of Changes in Net Pension Liability and Related Ratios - Police 83 RSI-1c Schedule of
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 LIMITED ACCESS STATE NUMBERED HIGHWAYS As of December 31, 2020
    2021 LIMITED ACCESS STATE NUMBERED HIGHWAYS As of December 31, 2020 CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF Transportation BUREAU OF POLICY AND PLANNING Office of Roadway Information Systems Roadway INVENTORY SECTION INTRODUCTION Each year, the Roadway Inventory Section within the Office of Roadway Information Systems produces this document entitled "Limited Access - State Numbered Highways," which lists all the limited access state highways in Connecticut. Limited access highways are defined as those that the Commissioner, with the advice and consent of the Governor and the Attorney General, designates as limited access highways to allow access only at highway intersections or designated points. This is provided by Section 13b-27 of the Connecticut General Statutes. This document is distributed within the Department of Transportation and the Division Office of the Federal Highway Administration for information and use. The primary purpose to produce this document is to provide a certified copy to the Office of the State Traffic Administration (OSTA). The OSTA utilizes this annual listing to comply with Section 14-298 of the Connecticut General Statutes. This statute, among other directives, requires the OSTA to publish annually a list of limited access highways. In compliance with this statute, each year the OSTA publishes the listing on the Department of Transportation’s website (http://www.ct.gov/dot/osta). The following is a complete listing of all state numbered limited access highways in Connecticut and includes copies of Connecticut General Statute Section 13b-27 (Limited Access Highways) and Section 14-298 (Office of the State Traffic Administration). It should be noted that only those highways having a State Route Number, State Road Number, Interstate Route Number or United States Route Number are listed.
    [Show full text]
  • Preserving Connecticut's Bridges Report Appendix
    Preserving Connecticut's Bridges Report Appendix - September 2018 Year Open/Posted/Cl Rank Town Facility Carried Features Intersected Location Lanes ADT Deck Superstructure Substructure Built osed Hartford County Ranked by Lowest Score 1 Bloomfield ROUTE 189 WASH BROOK 0.4 MILE NORTH OF RTE 178 1916 2 9,800 Open 6 2 7 2 South Windsor MAIN STREET PODUNK RIVER 0.5 MILES SOUTH OF I-291 1907 2 1,510 Posted 5 3 6 3 Bloomfield ROUTE 178 BEAMAN BROOK 1.2 MI EAST OF ROUTE 189 1915 2 12,000 Open 6 3 7 4 Bristol MELLEN STREET PEQUABUCK RIVER 300 FT SOUTH OF ROUTE 72 1956 2 2,920 Open 3 6 7 5 Southington SPRING STREET QUINNIPIAC RIVER 0.6 MI W. OF ROUTE 10 1960 2 3,866 Open 3 7 6 6 Hartford INTERSTATE-84 MARKET STREET & I-91 NB EAST END I-91 & I-84 INT 1961 4 125,700 Open 5 4 4 7 Hartford INTERSTATE-84 EB AMTRAK;LOCAL RDS;PARKING EASTBOUND 1965 3 66,450 Open 6 4 4 8 Hartford INTERSTATE-91 NB PARK RIVER & CSO RR AT EXIT 29A 1964 2 48,200 Open 5 4 4 9 New Britain SR 555 (WEST MAIN PAN AM SOUTHERN RAILROAD 0.4 MILE EAST OF RTE 372 1930 3 10,600 Open 4 5 4 10 West Hartford NORTH MAIN STREET WEST BRANCH TROUT BROOK 0.3 MILE NORTH OF FERN ST 1901 4 10,280 Open N 4 4 11 Manchester HARTFORD ROAD SOUTH FORK HOCKANUM RIV 2000 FT EAST OF SR 502 1875 2 5,610 Open N 4 4 12 Avon OLD FARMS ROAD FARMINGTON RIVER 500 FEET WEST OF ROUTE 10 1950 2 4,999 Open 4 4 6 13 Marlborough JONES HOLLOW ROAD BLACKLEDGE RIVER 3.6 MILES NORTH OF RTE 66 1929 2 1,255 Open 5 4 4 14 Enfield SOUTH RIVER STREET FRESHWATER BROOK 50 FT N OF ASNUNTUCK ST 1920 2 1,016 Open 5 4 4 15 Hartford INTERSTATE-84 EB BROAD ST, I-84 RAMP 191 1.17 MI S OF JCT US 44 WB 1966 3 71,450 Open 6 4 5 16 Hartford INTERSTATE-84 EAST NEW PARK AV,AMTRAK,SR504 NEW PARK AV,AMTRAK,SR504 1967 3 69,000 Open 6 4 5 17 Hartford INTERSTATE-84 WB AMTRAK;LOCAL RDS;PARKING .82 MI N OF JCT SR 504 SB 1965 4 66,150 Open 6 4 5 18 Hartford I-91 SB & TR 835 CONNECTICUT SOUTHERN RR AT EXIT 29A 1958 5 46,450 Open 6 5 4 19 Hartford SR 530 -AIRPORT RD ROUTE 15 422 FT E OF I-91 1964 5 27,200 Open 5 6 4 20 Bristol MEMORIAL BLVD.
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth Transportation Board Shannon Valentine 1401 East Broad Street (804) 786-2701 Chairperson Richmond, Virginia 23219 Fax: (804) 786-2940
    Commonwealth Transportation Board Shannon Valentine 1401 East Broad Street (804) 786-2701 Chairperson Richmond, Virginia 23219 Fax: (804) 786-2940 Agenda Item # 6 RESOLUTION OF THE COMMONWEALTH TRANSPORTATION BOARD January 16, 2019 MOTION Made By: Ms. Hynes, Seconded By: Mr. Kasprowicz Action: Motion Carried, Unanimously Title: Designation of the I-95 Express Lanes Fredericksburg Extension as HOT Lanes and Authorization for the Commissioner of Highways to Enter into an Updated Memorandum of Understanding with the Federal Highway Administration Concerning Tolling of the I-95 HOV/HOT Lanes, as Extended. WHEREAS, pursuant to the Public-Private Transportation Act of 1995 (the “PPTA”), (Va. Code §§ 33.2-1800, et seq.), the Virginia Department of Transportation (the “Department”) may allow private entities to develop and/or operate qualifying transportation facilities; and WHEREAS, on July 31, 2012, pursuant to the PPTA, the Department and 95 Express Lanes, LLC entered into a comprehensive agreement (the “Comprehensive Agreement”) relating to the I-95 HOV/HOT Lanes Project to develop, design, finance, construct, maintain, and operate 29 continuous miles of High Occupancy Toll (“HOT”) lanes on Interstates 95 and 395 between Turkeycock Run (milepost 2.0 on Interstate 395) and Garrisonville Road (VA Route 610) (the “Original 95 HOT Lanes”); and WHEREAS, on May 2, 2016, the Department entered into the First Amendment to the Comprehensive Agreement to extend the HOT lanes on Interstate 95 south 2.2 miles (near milepost 142.5 on Interstate 95) (the “I-95 Express Lanes Southern Terminus Extension”); and Resolution of the Board Designation of the I-95 Express Lanes Fredericksburg Extension as HOT Lanes January 16, 2019 Page 2 of 3 WHEREAS, on June 8, 2017, the Department entered into the Amended and Restated Comprehensive Agreement (the “First ARCA”) to extend the HOT lanes on Interstate 395 for approximately 8 miles north to the Washington D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • 262 MP Quarry Road, Milford, CT
    262 M-P Quarry Road, Milford, CT Industrial Space for Sublease at $5.75/SF NNN Industrial Space for Sublease with Three Loading Docks & Easy Access to I-95. The 6,903 SF space is available in a one-story 86,722 SF industrial park built in 1989 located in a light industrial zone near the corner of Quarry Road and Heenan Drive . The space features three 10' x 10' loading docks (one with leveler) in the warehouse, flexible office/retail space, an 800 SF atrium, kitchen and two restrooms. The current lease term expires November 30, 2022. Quarry Road Business Park tenants benefit from the location’s easy access to highways, railways, and airports. The property is one mile to I-95 (Exit 40), 5.3 miles to the Milford Parkway Connector to the Wilbur Cross Parkway / Merritt Parkway, 3.1 miles to the Milford Metro- North Train Station and 11.5 miles to Tweed New Haven Airport.. The Site Features Space Available: 6,903 SF Parking: In common Total Building Size: 86,722 SF Ceiling Height: 15' clear Land: 6.88 acres Loading: Three 10' x 10' loading dock Zoning: Light Industrial (ID) (One with leveler) Real Estate Tax: $1.07/SF (2019) Amenities: Wet sprinklers, Restrooms Year Built: 1989 Construction: Brick/Masonry Stories: One Utilities Water/Sewer: City/City A/C: Central Air Conditioning Heating: Gas Power: 200 Amps Contact Jon Angel President 203.335.6600, Ext. 21 [email protected] No warranty or representation, express or implied is made as to the accuracy of the information contained herein, and same is submitted subject to errors, omissions, change of price, rental or other conditions, withdrawal without notice and to any special listing conditions imposed by our principals.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter V: Transportation
    Transportation CHAPTER V: TRANSPORTATION A. GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS Located at the junction of Interstate 91 and Interstate 95, as well as a key access point to the Northeast Corridor rail line, New Haven is the highway and rail gateway to New England. It is the largest seaport in the state and the region and also the first city in Connecticut to have joined the national complete streets movement in 2008 by adopting the City’s Complete Streets Design Manual, balancing the needs of all roadway users including pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists. Journey to Work Data For a U.S. city of its size, New Haven has substantial share (45 Aerial view of New Haven seaport: largest in the state and the region. percent) of commuters who use a form of transportation other than driving alone. Approximately 15 percent of all commuters travel via carpool, close to 14 percent walk to work, while over 11 percent use a form of public transportation. Of the 10 largest cities in New England, only Boston has a higher percentage of residents who travel to work via non-motorized transportation. Also, out of this same group of cities, New Haven ranked highest in the percentage of people who walked to work. New Haven Vision 2025 V-1 Transportation Vehicular Circulation There are 255 miles of roadway in the city, ranging from Interstate highways to purely local residential streets. Of these roadways, 88 percent are locally-maintained public roads and 12 percent are state-maintained roads and highways. There are 43 locally- maintained bridges in the city.
    [Show full text]
  • CCPY Cultural Resources Technical Memo
    Crystal City / Potomac Yard Corridor Transit Improvements Project CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM October 2006 Cultural Resources Technical Memorandum Crystal City / Potomac Yard Corridor Transit Improvements Project Table of Contents Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................... 1 2.1 Project Purpose.................................................................................................................1 2.2 Background .......................................................................................................................1 2.3 Project Alignment Improvements .......................................................................................1 3.0 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ........................................................................... 3 4.0 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES ....................................................................... 5 4.1 Methodology......................................................................................................................5 4.2 Area of Potential Effects ....................................................................................................5 4.3 Background Research .......................................................................................................7 4.4 Architectural Resources within the City of Alexandria.........................................................7
    [Show full text]