Appendix 1 Timeline
I cite here key dates in Jane Eyre (in bold type) and of events and texts referred to in my reading.
1790 publication of Edmund Burke, Reflections on the Revolution in France; Mary Wollstonecraft, A Vindication of the Rightsof Men;and Thomas Paine, The Rightsof Man 1791 Declaration of the Rights of Man and of Citizens by the National Assembly of France 1792 birth of Bertha Mason 1797 birth of Edward Fairfax Rochester 1804 birth of St John Rivers Republic of Haiti established after protracted revolutionary struggle (1791–1804) 1807 abolition of the British slave trade 1808 birth of Blanche Ingram 1810 birth of John Reed 1813 missionary work in India authorisedbyBritishparliament 1814 birth of Jane Eyre 1816 birth of Charlotte Brontë 1819 Rochester and Bertha Mason marry 1821/2 Miss Cooke establishes female schools in Calcutta May 1823 British parliamentary debate on the abolition of slavery, a debate blamed by planters and the West India lobby for West Indian slave rebellions in 1823–24 amelioration measures recommended to colonies using slave labour July 1823 rebellious conspiracy Jamaica August 1823 Demerara rebellion December 1823 rebellious conspiracy Jamaica 1824 Rochester imprisons Bertha October 1824 Jane locked in red room 19 January 1825 Jane arrives at Lowood 1824/25 birth of Adèle Varens 1825 publication of William Thompson, Appeal of One Half the Human Race, Women, Againstthe Pretensions of the Other Half, Men, toRetain Them in Political, and Thence in Civil and DomesticSlavery 1826 an Act to alter and amend the Slave Law passed in Jamaica
127 128 Appendix 1
1827 the Act is disallowedby GeorgeIV 1830 revolution in Paris proclamation of Belgian independence 1831 revolution in Brazil October 1831 Bristol riots c. 27 December 1831–5 Sam Sharpe’s Rebellion, Jamaica (also known as January 1832 the Baptist War) 3 January 1832 Baptist missionary William Knibb arrested 7 February 1832William Knibb’schapel at Falmouthburned chapels burned this day and the next 1832 planter rebellion, Jamaica insurrection in Italy successful passageof the Reform Act in Britain October 1832 Jane arrives at Thornfield Hall December 1832 Sir George Lynn elected member for Millcote in first reform parliament 14 December 1832 Sheffield Massacre January 1833 Jane meets Rochester in the lane assembly of first reform parliament in Britain April 1833 Richard Mason visits Thornfield Hall 1 May 1833 Jane returns to Gateshead 12 June 1833 British House of Commons passes a bill for the abolition of slavery in the West Indies and Mauritius July 1833 Jane leaves Thornfield Hall after Rochester’s bigamous plan is exposed India Charter Act renewedbyBritishparliament Autumn 1833 Bertha Mason dies late October/early November 1833 posthumous publication of Sir Walter Scott’s Marmion in The Poetical Works of Sir Walter Scottt, editedbyJ.G. Lockhart. 5 November 1833 St John gives Jane a copy of Marmion 1 June 1834 Jane returns to Thornfield Hall 1834slavery abolished in Antigua and Bermuda slavery replacedby an apprenticeship system in other West Indian colonies and Mauritius 1 August 1838 emancipation of apprentices in the West Indies and Mauritius 1839 publication of Sarah Lewis, Woman’s Mission 1844 publication of Ann Richelieu Lamb, Can Woman Regenerate Society? 1847 publication of Jane Eyre February 1848 Jane Eyre or The Secrets of Thornfield Manorr,by John Courtney, performed at the Victoria Theatre, London revolution in France Appendix 1 129
10April 1848 Chartist march in London December 1848 Elizabeth Rigby reviews Jane Eyre in the Quarterly Review 1859 publication of Cousin Stella; or Conflictt, by Henrietta Camilla Jenkin centenary of the birth of William Wilberforce twenty-fifth anniversary of the coming into effect of the Emancipation Act Notes
Introduction
1. Williams worked for the novel’s publisher, Smith, Elder, and Company. 2. The blurb for a new book, in press at the time of my writing, The Worlding Project promises to entrench a different concept of worlding again. Rob Wilson and Christopher Lee Connery announce the edited collection as a ‘manifesto that aims to redefine the aesthetics and politics of postcolonial globalization with alternative forms and frames of global becoming’. ‘The book posits that world literature, cultural studies, anddisciplinary practices must be “worlded” into expressions from disparate critical angles of vision, multiple frameworks, and field practices as yet emerging or unidentified.’ 3. Parry cites scholarship by Jenny Sharpe, Suvendrini Perera, Susan Meyer, Carl Plasa, and Marcus Wood, all of whom have worked in the wake of Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak’s essay ‘Three Women’s Texts and a Critique of Imperi- alism’.In Culture and Imperialism, Said urges a contrapuntal reading practice which involves ‘a simultaneous awareness both of the metropolitan history that is narrated and of those other histories against which (and together with which) the dominating discourse acts’(59). 4. In a very recent edition of Jane Eyre Shuttleworth comments that an 1808 date ‘would seem to be out of keeping with other evidence for textual dating which would place the novel more in the 1820s and 1830s’(Explanatory Notes 483). 5. One contemporary reviewer, the critic for the church magazine the Guardian, comments on the likely date of the gift:
We learn in vol. iii, p.143,that ‘Marmion’has just been published—this fixes the date of our story at the year 1808—and in vol. i, p. 30, (ten years before that date) we have a recollection of a nursemaid singing, ‘In the dayswhen we went gipsying,along time ago,’ which makes a considerable impression on little Jane. We had no idea that this song was a child of the last century. And in vol. ii, p. 170, (about 1808 again) we hear of an empty- headed,cold-hearted, uncharitable young lady,whoregardstherubric as the ‘great attraction’ of the Prayer book, and is a ‘rigid formalist in matters of religion,’ and afterwards turns Romanist. We should have thought that, in those days, such mindsashers would have taken an opposite course. We fear, too, that a ‘Saints-day service at the New Church’ (p. 175) was not then to be met with. (717)
6. A 2003 stoush in the premier journal Victorian Studies attests to what is at stake for some in readings of racialization in Jane Eyre. Erin O’Connor pathologizes, indeed pillories, the emergence and scope of postcolonial literary history, what she terms an ‘ethnohistory’ (243,n.4)‘predicated on the fantastic reach of marginal details’ (227). This ethnohistory characteristically inflates ‘a
130 Notes 131
minor, undevelopedplot line’(225), ‘marginal ethnic characters or passing mentions of imported things’ (226) which in the interest of scholarly rigour and proper professional training need to be put back in their place, shrunk to their true scale within the text. O’Connor’s polemical mapping of the reach of postcolonial literary history is roundly and cogently criticized by Patrick Brantlinger and Deirdre David in a later issue of Victorian Studies. 7. FleemingJenkin (1833–1885) was the inventor of telpherage and advances in underwater telegraph technology. At his death he was Professor of Engin- eering at Edinburgh University.Fleeming Jenkin’s recent biographers Gillian Cookson and Colin A. Hempstead note that
Stevenson, in an uncharacteristically critical passagewhere he tried to account for the tendency towards liberalism [in Fleeming Jenkin] which he, Stevenson, considered illogical, placed the blame for this and other short- comingsonJenkin’s mother, ‘an imperious drawing-room queen’.Thus Jenkin inherited her faults: ‘generous, excessive, enthusiastic, external; catching ideas, brandishing them when caught ready at fifteen to correct a consul, ready at fifty to explain to any artist his own art’. And while Jenkin was meticulous in his work, ‘his thoroughness was not that of the patient scholar, but of an untrained woman with fits of passionate study’. (144)
Shirley Foster argues that Gaskell ‘was always anxious to helpother women writers’(3). With Gaskell’s help Jenkin placed two stories (‘Coralie’ and‘The Child-Seer’) with Household Words in 1855 and Cousin Stella with Smith,Elder, in 1859. Vineta Colby describes Jenkin as one of Lee’s ‘surrogate mother figures’ (14). She gives some detail of Jenkin’s relationships with Giovanni Ruffini and his brother Agostino Ruffini (15). Shafquat Towheed provides the fullest account of Jenkin’s relationship with Lee (203–12). In the entry on Jenkin in The Longman Companion toVictorian Fiction John Sutherland conflates her output with that of Cecilia G. Jenkin. The error was revealed by my consulting TheArchives of Richard Bentley and Son, 1829–1898. 8. Henrietta Camilla Jackson married Charles Jenkin,amidshipman in the British navy,in1832. In the mid-1840s he rose to the rank of Commander, but was ‘superseded,and could never again obtain employment’(Stevenson).
1 Christianity and the state of slavery
1. Editors of Jane Eyre typically suggest that Jane is referring to the reformist Chartist Movement, whose People’sCharter was published in 1838and presented as a petition to the House of Commons in 1839. That the charter is spelled with a capital C in the manuscript is taken as confirmation of this interpretation (see, for instance, Ian Jack 328 and Shuttleworth 475). Charters are also, however, legal instruments of imperial governance. In debates over West Indian slavery in the early 1830s, Peter Borthwick, a pro- slavery speaker, urged that ‘the planters are bound by the charter of King GeorgeIIof 1754 to cultivate their land with slaves’ (‘First Meeting’). Here 132 Notes
Ipursue the implications of a dating I first outlined in 1999 in ‘Tropical Extravagance’ 8–9. 2. Catherine Hall has recently highlightedhis missionary work in White, Male and MiddleClass and in Civilising Subjects. 3. Secretary Stanley, Circular despatch to the Governors of his Majesty’s Colo- nial Possessions, 13June1833, Great Britain, Papers Relating to the Abolition of Slavery 15. 4. Great Britain, Hansard (17 July1833): 799. The term ‘domestic slavery’ was usedbyCharles Grant. 5. Hansard (17 July1833): 798. 6. Great Britain, Minutes of Evidence ,Appendix K: 579. 7. Great Britain, An Act for effecting an Arrangement with the East India Company [28 Aug.1833], Statutes 444. 8. Hansard (17 July 1833): 799. 9. See, for instance, Sutherland 427–37. 10. Jane Jack and Margaret Smith, for instance, concur with this view, attrib- uting Brontë’sapparent inconsistencies to historical‘allusions to whose chronological significance she is unlikely to have given thought’ (610), and commenting that ‘it is clear that the action is set thirty or fortyyears before the time of publication, and that further precision is no part of Charlotte Brontë’s purpose’(611).Shuttleworth,who has recently revised Smith’s notes to the Oxford World’s Classics edition of Jane Eyre, notes that the 1808 publication date of Marmion ‘would seem to be out of keeping with other evidence for textual dating which would place the novel more in the 1820s and 1830s. There was, however, a new edition, with an introduction by Scott in 1830’ (Explanatory Notes 483). The evidence for an 1820s and 1830s setting which she cites is not drawn from imperial or colonial history. 11. Jane’s intervention in the debate over Scott is more fully evident in the passageasawhole: she describes the ‘new publication’ as
one of those genuine productions so often vouchsafed to the fortu- nate public of those days—the golden age of modern literature. Alas! the readers of our era are less favoured. But, courage! I will not pause either to accrue or repine. I know poetry is not dead, nor genius lost; nor has Mammon gainedpower over either, to bind or slay; they will both assert their existence, their presence, their liberty, and strength again one day. Powerful angels, safe in heaven! they smile when sordid souls triumph, and feeble ones weep over their destruc- tion. Poetry destroyed. Genius banished? No! Mediocrity, no: donot let envyprompt you to the thought. No; they not only live, but reign, and redeem: and without their divine influence spread every- where, you would be in hell—the hell of your own meanness. (370; vol. 3, ch. 6)
Jane alludes here to Lord Byron’s attack on Scott in ‘English Bardsand Scotch Reviewers’ (1809), in which he complains that contemporary taste favours ‘Pseudo-bards’ idolized by ‘[e]ach country Book-club’ after ‘lawful Genius’ had been hurled ‘from the throne’. He represents Scott’s receipt of 1000 Notes 133
pounds for Marmion from his publishers as symptomatic ‘[of] prostituted Muse andhireling bard’: