DOCSLIB.ORG

2004 Passenger Rail Component of the Florida Rail Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2004 Passenger Rail Component of the Florida Rail Plan final report 2004 Passenger Rail Component of the Florida Rail Plan prepared for Florida Department of Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 4445 Willard Avenue, Suite 300 Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815 June 2005 final report 2004 Passenger Rail Component of the Florida Rail Plan prepared for Florida Department of Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 4445 Willard Avenue, Suite 300 Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815 June 2005 2004 Passenger Rail Component of the Florida Rail Plan Table of Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. ES-1 1.0 Introduction.................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Purpose................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Authority ................................................................................................................ 1-2 1.3 Contents.................................................................................................................. 1-3 2.0 Need for Passenger Rail Services............................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Population Growth............................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Roadway Congestion............................................................................................ 2-4 2.3 Airport Congestion............................................................................................... 2-8 2.4 Rail – Underutilized Alternative......................................................................... 2-11 3.0 Description of Existing Passenger Rail Services..................................................... 3-1 3.1 Amtrak.................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.1 History ........................................................................................................ 3-1 3.1.2 Current Amtrak Status ............................................................................. 3-2 3.1.3 Florida Route Descriptions ...................................................................... 3-2 3.1.4 Ridership..................................................................................................... 3-5 3.1.5 Economic Impact....................................................................................... 3-8 3.1.6 Travel Times in Comparison to Automobiles and Planes................... 3-8 3.2 Commuter Services............................................................................................... 3-9 3.2.1 Current Operations................................................................................... 3-9 3.2.2 History ........................................................................................................ 3-11 3.2.3 Ridership..................................................................................................... 3-11 3.2.4 Other Rail-Based Transit Systems........................................................... 3-12 3.3 Diesel Multiple Units............................................................................................ 3-13 4.0 Status of Proposed Passenger Rail Systems............................................................. 4-1 4.1 Florida Intercity Passenger Rail Service............................................................. 4-1 4.1.1 Background ................................................................................................ 4-1 4.1.2 Assessment of Potential Corridors for Florida Intercity Passenger Service ......................................................................................................... 4-2 4.1.3 Florida Intercity Passenger Service Vision Plan.................................... 4-4 4.1.4 Financial Analysis and Benefits............................................................... 4-5 4.1.5 Conclusion.................................................................................................. 4-7 4.2 Commuter Rail Services....................................................................................... 4-7 4.2.1 South Florida Regional Transportation Authority (Tri-Rail) .............. 4-7 4.2.2 Orlando ....................................................................................................... 4-10 4.2.3 Tampa ......................................................................................................... 4-11 Florida Department of Transportation i 7429.030 2004 Passenger Rail Component of the Florida Rail Plan Table of Contents (continued) 4.3 High-Speed Rail..................................................................................................... 4-12 4.3.1 Background ................................................................................................ 4-12 4.3.2 The Florida Overland Express Public/Private Partnership ................ 4-13 4.3.3 Florida High-Speed Rail from 2000 to Present...................................... 4-14 4.3.4 The Future of Florida High-Speed Rail .................................................. 4-15 4.4 Freight Rail Initiatives Potentially Impacting Passenger Service................... 4-16 4.4.1 CSX Transportation Background and Strategic Plan ........................... 4-16 4.4.2 Florida East Coast Railway Strategic Plan............................................. 4-20 4.4.3 Network Gaps............................................................................................ 4-21 5.0 Other Issues and Summary ......................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Federal Opportunities.......................................................................................... 5-1 5.2 Public-Private Opportunities............................................................................... 5-5 5.3 Summary ................................................................................................................ 5-6 Glossary .................................................................................................................................. G-1 ii Florida Department of Transportation 7429.030 2004 Passenger Rail Component of the Florida Rail Plan List of Tables ES.1 Summary of Florida Amtrak Passenger Rail Service............................................... ES-5 2.1 Florida is Now One of the Most Densely Populated States in the Country ......... 2-4 2.2 Florida Passenger Enplanements 2003....................................................................... 2-10 3.1 Summary of Florida Amtrak Passenger Rail Service............................................... 3-4 3.2 Top Amtrak Ridership States ...................................................................................... 3-6 3.3 Florida Amtrak Ridership by Station......................................................................... 3-7 3.4 Comparison of Modal Travel Time for Select Florida Cities .................................. 3-9 3.5 Tri-Rail Timeline of Major Events .............................................................................. 3-11 4.1 Potential Travel Markets for Intercity Passenger Rail Service................................ 4-3 4.2 Phase 2 – Projected Service, Ridership, Costs, and Revenues ................................ 4-6 5.1 Federal Transit Administration Grant Programs ..................................................... 5-2 Florida Department of Transportation iii 2004 Passenger Rail Component of the Florida Rail Plan List of Figures ES.1 Projected Population Growth...................................................................................... ES-3 ES.2 Tri-Rail Commuter Rail System Map......................................................................... ES-6 ES.3 Diesel Multiple Unit Pulling Two Bi-Level Commuter Coaches in Tri-Rail Test... ES-7 ES.4 Florida Intercity Passenger Rail Service Vision Plan ............................................... ES-9 ES.5 Combining State and CSX Transportation Freight/Passenger Strategies Might be Synergistic ..................................................................................................... ES-13 2.1 Projected Population Growth...................................................................................... 2-2 2.2 Projected Population Growth within Florida by Region......................................... 2-3 2.3 Annual Hours of Delay on Florida’s Highways....................................................... 2-5 2.4 Florida Highway Congestion, 1998 ............................................................................ 2-7 2.5 Florida Highway Congestion, 2020 ............................................................................ 2-8 2.6 Florida Intrastate Scheduled Flights .......................................................................... 2-11 3.1 Amtrak Routes and Stations in Florida...................................................................... 3-5 3.2 Tri-Rail Commuter Rail System Map......................................................................... 3-10 3.3 Annual Tri-Rail Ridership ........................................................................................... 3-12 3.4 Diesel Multiple Unit Pulling Two Bi-Level Commuter Coaches in Tri-Rail Test... 3-14 3.5 Double-Deck Diesel Multiple Unit
Load more

Recommended publications
  • House of Representatives Final Bill Analysis Summary
    HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES FINAL BILL ANALYSIS BILL #: CS/CS/CS/HB 695 FINAL HOUSE FLOOR ACTION: SUBJECT/SHORT South Florida Regional 111 Y’s 6 N’s TITLE Transportation Authority SPONSOR(S): Government Accountability Committee; Transportation & Tourism Appropriations GOVERNOR’S Subcommittee; Transportation & Approved ACTION: Infrastructure Subcommittee; Santiago COMPANION CS/CS/SB 842 BILLS: SUMMARY ANALYSIS CS/CS/CS/HB 695 passed the House on April 28, 2017, and subsequently passed the Senate on May 1, 2017. The bill addresses insurance liability issues related to the South Florida Regional Transportation Authority (SFRTA), which operates commuter rail service in Palm Beach, Broward, and Miami-Dade Counties. The bill provides SFRTA with the ability to indemnify the Florida East Coast Railway (FECR) and All Aboard Florida (AAF) under certain circumstances. The bill provides who is responsible for property damage and injury to certain persons associated with several scenarios involving rail accidents. The bill also provides an allocation of risk between the parties and includes provisions for passengers and other rail corridor invitees. The bill authorizes SFRTA to purchase railroad liability insurance of $295 million per occurrence, and allows it to adjust the limit in accordance with applicable law. The bill also requires SFRTA to maintain a $5 million self- insurance retention account. The bill authorizes the Department of Transportation (DOT) to indemnify and insure certain rail services on DOT-owned rail corridors. The bill prohibits SFRTA from entering into a contract or other agreement, or renewing or extending any existing contract or other agreement, which may be funded, in whole or in part, with DOT provided funds without DOT’s prior review and written approval of SFRTA’s proposed expenditures.
    [Show full text]
  • Unleashing the Transformative Power of Culture and Creativity for Local Development
    OECD Conference on Unleashing the Transformative Power of Culture and Creativity for Local Development 6-7 December 2018 | Venice, Italy LOGISTICAL INFORMATION Last updated on 18 October 2018 ■ GENERAL INFORMATION Working language English/Italian (partial Italian interpretation provided) Date/Time DAY 1: Thursday 6 December, 2018 | From 8.45 to 17.30 DAY 2: Friday 7 December, 2018 | From 9.00 to 17.00 Location Scuola Grande San Giovanni Evangelista (Google map) San Polo, 2454, 30125 Venezia VE, Italy Registration Due to the limited number of places available, we kindly advise you to register via the online registration form as soon as possible and not later than 26 November 2018. Registrations will be processed in the order in which they are received. Registrations will close once the maximum limit is reached, even if that is before the official closing date. The organisers reserve the right to limit participation. Participation costs There is no participation fee. Travel, accommodation costs and visa fees are covered by participants themselves. Visa Please note that participants are responsible for obtaining their own visa for entering Italy if necessary. Please contact your Ministry of Foreign Affairs if that is the case. If you need at letter of invitation to obtain a visa, please note this in your registration and provide detailed information regarding your flight references and the correct date of arrival and departure. More information on Italian visas is available at the following site: http://vistoperitalia.esteri.it/home/en Website oe.cd/culture-conference Twitter @OECD_local #OECDCulture 2 ■ HOTELS IN VENICE The most convenient accommodation for participants to reach the Conference venue is Sestiere Santa Croce and Dorsoduro.
    [Show full text]
  • Floating Slab Mats 2020
    PRODUCT REFERENCE LIST Floating Slab Mats 2020 Year Network Project Product Type Type Track Load Total 2002 FR TBM Bordeaux: Tramway - Tramway 100 kN 31,000 m² Bordeaux 2002 PT Metro Lisbon: Odivelas, - Metro 100 kN 10,000 m² Lisboa Campo Grande & Falagueira station 2003 BE MIVB/STIB Brussels: Chaussée de - Tramway 100 kN 1,800 m² Charleroi - Phase 1 2003 Brussels: Chaussée de - Tramway 100 kN 5,250 m² Charleroi - Phase 2 2003 De Lijn Gent: Gent St-Pieters - - Tramway 100 kN 10,000 m² Flanders Expo 2003 FR TBM Bordeaux: Tramway - Tramway 130 kN 9,700 m² Bordeaux 2003 GR TRAM SA Athens: Kasamouli - - Tramway 100 kN 4,000 m² Panagitsas 2004 BE De Lijn Gent: Gent St-Pieters - - Tramway 95 kN 400 m² Flanders Expo 2004 ES GTP-FGV Valencia: Tram Valencia - Tramway 113 kN 200 m² 2005 BE MIVB/STIB Brussels: Avenue de - Tramway 100 kN 2,245 m² l'Hippodrome 2005 Brussels: Rue du Bailli - Tramway 100 kN 2,410 m² 2005 Brussels: Avenue - Tramway 100 kN 610 m² P.Janson 2005 Brussels: L94 - - Tramway 120 kN 600 m² Boulevard du Souverain 2005 Brussels: Montgomery - Tramway 100 kN 250 m² 2005 Brussels: Terminus - Tramway 100 kN 550 m² Boondael 2005 PT Metro Porto Porto: Metro do Porto - Tramway 100 kN 3,900 m² 2006 BE MIVB/STIB Brussels: Terminus - Tramway 130 kN 481 m² Louise Legrand 2006 Brussels: Montgomery - Tramway 100 kN 300 m² Fase 2 2006 Brussels: Montgomery - Tramway 100 kN 290 m² Fase 2E 2006 Brussels: Wielemans - - Tramway 100 kN 15 m² Van Volxem 2006 ES GTP-FGV Alicante: Tram Line 2 PANDROL FSM- Tramway 113 kN 690 m² L10 2020 © Pandrol 2020
    [Show full text]
  • ACRP Report 37 – Guidebook for Planning and Implementing
    AIRPORT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH ACRP PROGRAM REPORT 37 Sponsored by the Federal Aviation Administration Guidebook for Planning and Implementing Automated People Mover Systems at Airports ACRP OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE* TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2010 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE* CHAIR OFFICERS James Wilding CHAIR: Michael R. Morris, Director of Transportation, North Central Texas Council of Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (re- Governments, Arlington tired) VICE CHAIR: Neil J. Pedersen, Administrator, Maryland State Highway Administration, Baltimore VICE CHAIR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board Jeff Hamiel MEMBERS Minneapolis–St. Paul Metropolitan Airports Commission J. Barry Barker, Executive Director, Transit Authority of River City, Louisville, KY Allen D. Biehler, Secretary, Pennsylvania DOT, Harrisburg MEMBERS Larry L. Brown, Sr., Executive Director, Mississippi DOT, Jackson James Crites Deborah H. Butler, Executive Vice President, Planning, and CIO, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Dallas–Fort Worth International Airport Norfolk, VA Richard de Neufville William A.V. Clark, Professor, Department of Geography, University of California, Los Angeles Massachusetts Institute of Technology Eugene A. Conti, Jr., Secretary of Transportation, North Carolina DOT, Raleigh Kevin C. Dolliole Unison Consulting Nicholas J. Garber, Henry L. Kinnier Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, and Director, John K. Duval Center for Transportation Studies, University of Virginia, Charlottesville Austin Commercial, LP Jeffrey W. Hamiel, Executive Director, Metropolitan Airports Commission, Minneapolis, MN Kitty Freidheim Paula J. Hammond, Secretary, Washington State DOT, Olympia Freidheim Consulting Steve Grossman Edward A. (Ned) Helme, President, Center for Clean Air Policy, Washington, DC Jacksonville Aviation Authority Adib K. Kanafani, Cahill Professor of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley Tom Jensen Susan Martinovich, Director, Nevada DOT, Carson City National Safe Skies Alliance Debra L.
    [Show full text]
  • Aware Pilot Project Along South Florida Rail Corridor
    AWARE PILOT PROJECT ALONG SOUTH FLORIDA RAIL CORRIDOR FINAL PROJECT REPORT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONTRACT # BC498 AMENDMENT #2 Prepared by: Nestor Traffic Systems, Inc. Report Date: June 4, 2002 400 Massasoit Ave. Suite 200 East Providence, RI 02914 Telephone: 401-434-5522 Fax: 401-434-5809 Internet: www.nestor.com Copyright © 2002, Nestor Traffic Systems, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS........................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 FIGURES ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 1-3 TABLES ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 1-3 GLOSSARY OF TERMS .......................................................................................................................................................... 1-4 1 PROJECT BACKGROUND AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................. 1-5 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................................................................. 2-1 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION (AS PROPOSED)...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Etir Code Lists
    eTIR Code Lists Code lists CL01 Equipment size and type description code (UN/EDIFACT 8155) Code specifying the size and type of equipment. 1 Dime coated tank A tank coated with dime. 2 Epoxy coated tank A tank coated with epoxy. 6 Pressurized tank A tank capable of holding pressurized goods. 7 Refrigerated tank A tank capable of keeping goods refrigerated. 9 Stainless steel tank A tank made of stainless steel. 10 Nonworking reefer container 40 ft A 40 foot refrigerated container that is not actively controlling temperature of the product. 12 Europallet 80 x 120 cm. 13 Scandinavian pallet 100 x 120 cm. 14 Trailer Non self-propelled vehicle designed for the carriage of cargo so that it can be towed by a motor vehicle. 15 Nonworking reefer container 20 ft A 20 foot refrigerated container that is not actively controlling temperature of the product. 16 Exchangeable pallet Standard pallet exchangeable following international convention. 17 Semi-trailer Non self propelled vehicle without front wheels designed for the carriage of cargo and provided with a kingpin. 18 Tank container 20 feet A tank container with a length of 20 feet. 19 Tank container 30 feet A tank container with a length of 30 feet. 20 Tank container 40 feet A tank container with a length of 40 feet. 21 Container IC 20 feet A container owned by InterContainer, a European railway subsidiary, with a length of 20 feet. 22 Container IC 30 feet A container owned by InterContainer, a European railway subsidiary, with a length of 30 feet. 23 Container IC 40 feet A container owned by InterContainer, a European railway subsidiary, with a length of 40 feet.
    [Show full text]
  • Mobility Press93.Indd
    mobility press magazine Pisa: eliminare l'intasamento del trasporto su gomma, l'obiettivo del Pisamover! Da Napoli al Giappone: intervista a Maurizio Manfellotto, AD di Hitachi Rail Italy TRASPOL: il mercato delle autolinee a lunga percorrenza alla prova dei fatti nel medio periodo Numero 93 - 22 Marzo 2017 3 numero 93 - 22 Marzo 2017 Editoriale Pisa: eliminare l'intasamento del trasporto su gomma, l'obiettivo del Pisamover! Sono solo 1.750 metri, ma in Toscana tu� ne Qua� ro anni di preparazione, proge� azione e parlano, ed a Pisa già ne sono orgogliosi. È il per o� enere un fi nanziamento europeo, due people mover che collega la ci� à con l’aero- anni per l’esecuzione delle opere. Tempi, così porto Galileo Galilei e va a sos� tuire le nave� e li ha defi ni� il sindaco nel corso della cerimo- che intasavano l’angusta strada che collega la nia di apertura, “cinesi”. ci� à con lo scalo a� raverso il quar� ere di San Forse è vero che in meno di se� e anni in Italia Giusto. L’intasamento del trasporto su gomma non si fa nulla, ma è anche vero che stabilità è stato il cruccio delle amministrazioni locali poli� ca, omogeneità di indirizzo tra le diverse di Pisa, perché la ci� à della Torre pendente, is� tuzioni, ma anche tenacia e capacità tec- ogni giorno vede lievitare la sua popolazione nica nella preparazione delle carte per evita- dai poco più di 90 mila residen� a circa 160 re inu� li ricorsi, consentono di avere percorsi mila: pendolari, studen� e, sopra� u� o turis� .
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan's Railroad History
    Contributing Organizations The Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) wishes to thank the many railroad historical organizations and individuals who contributed to the development of this document, which will update continually. Ann Arbor Railroad Technical and Historical Association Blue Water Michigan Chapter-National Railway Historical Society Detroit People Mover Detroit Public Library Grand Trunk Western Historical Society HistoricDetroit.org Huron Valley Railroad Historical Society Lansing Model Railroad Club Michigan Roundtable, The Lexington Group in Transportation History Michigan Association of Railroad Passengers Michigan Railroads Association Peaker Services, Inc. - Brighton, Michigan Michigan Railroad History Museum - Durand, Michigan The Michigan Railroad Club The Michigan State Trust for Railroad Preservation The Southern Michigan Railroad Society S O October 13, 2014 Dear Michigan Residents: For more than 180 years, Michigan’s railroads have played a major role in the economic development of the state. This document highlights many important events that have occurred in the evolution of railroad transportation in Michigan. This document was originally published to help celebrate Michigan’s 150th birthday in 1987. A number of organizations and individuals contributed to its development at that time. The document has continued to be used by many since that time, so a decision was made to bring it up to date and keep the information current. Consequently, some 28 years later, the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) has updated the original document and is placing it on our website for all to access. As you journey through this history of railroading in Michigan, may you find the experience both entertaining and beneficial. MDOT is certainly proud of Michigan’s railroad heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • Centro Di Ricerca Trasporti Università Degli Studi Di Genova
    Centro di Ricerca Trasporti Università degli Studi di Genova Impianti speciali: ruolo e caratteristiche Riccardo Genova Visita tecnica del 6 febbraio Mobilità e trasporti La progettazione di nuove reti di trasporto pubblico e la trasformazione di quelle esistenti realizzano gli obiettivi di sostenibilità attraverso: riqualificazione delle città e dei centri storici; impiego di veicoli per il trasporto pubblico a grande capacità di trasporto ed ecologici; riduzione della mobilità privata. Fondamentali per l’ottenimento di tali obiettivi sono l’integrazione modale e la fruibilità del trasporto pubblico Integrazione ed interoperabilità Lo scambio modale deve essere semplice ed immediato. Sono necessari: orari integrati; sistema unico tariffario. A tale scopo vengono istituite Agenzie per la Mobilità cui delegare le funzioni di: pianificazione; progettazione e controllo del TPL. Il concetto di interoperabilità non è da ricondursi al mero aspetto fisico (come i sistemi tram treno) ma a tutti gli strumenti di mobilità (biglietti elettronici, sistemi informativi) Accessibilità ed ultimo miglio L’accessibilità deve essere valutata come elemento di efficienza e qualità: esigenze di sicurezza e contrasto all’evasione mal si conciliano con la fruibilità degli impianti appesantendo i costi di gestione. Le moderne tecnologie consentono di conciliare gli aspetti legati al governo della mobilità (AVM-AVL, biglietto elettronico, informazione real time all’utenza su pannelli e paline, APP e servizi Open Data). Gli impianti speciali trovano applicazione per ultimo miglio, tragitti condivisi (anche nelle stazioni) con persone con difficoltà motoria e con passeggino, percorsi a profilo planoaltimetrico complesso. Tipologie di impianti Gli impianti speciali trovano impiego, per loro natura, sia per brevi spostamenti che per implementare veri e propri «assi attrezzati» ad elevata capacità di trasporto: ascensori verticali o inclinati; sistemi traslatori-elevatori; funicolari; funivie urbane o rurali; sistemi a spintore; sistemi a cremagliera; people mover.
    [Show full text]
  • Cypress Creek Mobility Hub Master Plan Technical Memorandum #1 – Existing Conditions
    Cypress Creek Mobility Hub Master Plan Technical Memorandum #1 – Existing Conditions August 2015 Cypress Creek Mobility Hub Master Plan – Technical Memorandum #1 1 Contents 1.0 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................ 4 2.0 Introduction......................................................................................................................................... 8 3.0 Planning Context ............................................................................................................................. 10 3.1 Relevant Plans and Policies ............................................................................................................ 10 3.2 Land Use and Development Pattern .............................................................................................. 20 3.3 Transportation Network ................................................................................................................ 21 3.4 Utilities ............................................................................................................................................ 29 4.0 Regulatory Environment ............................................................................................................... 37 4.1 Existing Land Use and Zoning ......................................................................................................... 37 4.2 Future Land Use and Zoning ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 3.0 Passenger Rail Services and Initiatives in Florida
    Investment Element of the 2010 Florida Rail System Plan 3.0 Passenger Rail Services and Initiatives in Florida 3.1 Overview Although Florida’s total population shrunk by about 60,000 residents in 2009 – a first in over three decades according to state demographers – and overall population growth rates have declined three points to approximately 2 percent annually due in large part to the nationwide recession and declining housing market, the State is expected to continue to attract retirees and residents looking for warmer weather and low costs of living. State demographers at the University of Florida predict that once the recession ends, Florida can expect to grow as much as 200,000 people per year – fewer than the 300,000 a year the State averaged during the past three decades, but enough to lead most other states in net growth. By 2035, more than 25 million people will call Florida home, representing a 56 percent increase between 2000 and 2035.45 In absolute terms, Florida will add over 9 million people to its population between this time period. Furthermore, although much of Florida’s growth will be concentrated in urbanized areas, growth will occur across Florida’s regions and urbanized area boundaries will expand across county lines. Florida’s density per square mile was 344 according to the 2009 Census and was ranked the eighth densest state in the nation. Population growth, and the associated transportation demand, will place additional pressure on all aspects of the State’s transportation system. A growing population not only adds automobiles to roadways, but the increase in economic activity to support this population also will generate additional demands for freight movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Intermodal System Urban Fixed Guideway
    Strategic Intermodal System Urban Fixed Guideway To plan for an efficient and safe Urban Fixed Guideway Terminals in Florida transportation network in Florida, Located Serves SIS Integrated Co-located with the state legislature and Florida Facility Name District System Designation at or near air, sea, or with other major Park-&- termini spaceport SIS system Ride Facility Department of Transportation (FDOT) DeLand Station* 5 SunRail SIS Hub No No No No developed the Strategic Intermodal DeBary Station 5 SunRail SIS Hub Yes No No No System (SIS). As part of the SIS, there Sanford Auto Train Track Station 5 SunRail SIS Station No No No No are specific elements Lake Mary Station 5 SunRail SIS Station No No No No that have been identified as critical to Longwood Station 5 SunRail SIS Station No No No No the economic success of Florida. Altamonte Springs Station 5 SunRail SIS Station No No No No Maitland Station 5 SunRail SIS Station No No No No One of these elements are Urban Fixed Winter Park / Amtrak Station 5 SunRail SIS Hub No No Yes No Guideway (UFG) terminals, which Advent Health Station 5 SunRail SIS Hub No No No Yes serve as hubs and stations for the urban Lynx Central Station 5 SunRail SIS Station No No No No fixed guideways throughout Florida. Church Street Station 5 SunRail SIS Station No No No No Orlando Health / Amtrak Station 5 SunRail SIS Hub No No Yes No The adjacent table lists the UFG Sand Lake Road 5 SunRail SIS Station No No No No terminals within Florida and whether Meadow Woods Station 5 SunRail SIS Station No No No No they are designated as a SIS Hub or Tupperware Station 5 SunRail SIS Station No No No No SIS Station, based on criteria defined Kissimmee / Amtrak Station 5 SunRail SIS Station No No No No by FDOT.
    [Show full text]