DOCSLIB.ORG

Algal Ring Test Results Showing Summary of Differences

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Algal Ring Test Results Showing Summary of Differences The National Marine Biological Analytical Quality Control Scheme www.nmbaqcs.org Ring Test Bulletin – RM RT10 Dr Emma Wells Wells Marine Surveys March 2016 Email: [email protected] RING TEST DETAILS Ring Test – RM RT10 Type/Contents – Rockyshore Intertidal macroalgae identification Circulated – 11th January 2015 Completion Date – 19th February 2016 Number of Subscribing Laboratories – 4 Number of Participating Laboratories – 4 Number of Results Received – 10 Table 1: Summary of Differences Total differences for 10 returns Specimen Genera Species Genus Species RT1001 Dilsea Carnosa 0 0 RT1002 Litosiphon laminariae 0 1 RT1003 Prasiola stipitata 0 1 RT1004 Phyllophora pseudoceranoides 0 0 RT1005 Chaetomorpha ligustica 0 0 RT1006 Fucus vesiculosus 0 0 RT1007 Mesogloia vermiculata 7 9 RT1008 Cruoria pellita 5 5 RT1009 Saccharina latissima 1 0 RT1010 Codium fragile subsp. fragile 0 2 RT1011 Odonthalia dentata 0 0 RT1012 Acrosiphonia acrta 2 2 RT1013 Bostrychia scorpioides 0 0 RT1014 Crytopleura ramosa 0 0 RT1015 Hincksia granulosa 1 1 RT1016 Blidingia minima 5 5 RT1017 Phycodrys rubens 0 0 RT1018 Ulva pseudocurvata 3 4 RT1019 Colpomenia peregrina 8 8 RT1020 Palmaria palmata 0 0 Total differences 32 38 Average differences per Genus/ species 1.600 1.900 Table 2: The identification of intertidal macroalgae made by participating laboratories for RM RT10 (arranged by specimen). Names are given where different from the AQC identification, misspelt identifications, synonyms or acceptable alternate identifications are denoted by brackets [ ]. RT1001 RT1002 RT1003 RT1004 RT1005 RT1006 RT1007 RT1008 RT1009 RT1010 Litosiphon Prasiola Phyllophora Chaetomorpha Fucus Mesogloia Saccharina Codium fragile Lab Code Dilsea carnosa Cruoria pellita laminariae stipitata pseudoceranoides ligustica vesiculosus vermiculata latissima subsp. fragile Mastocarpus _ _ − furfuracea _ _ _ _ _ _ MA2310 stellatus [Liebmannia] _ − alariae _ _ _ _ _ _ _ MA2303a leveillei Eudesme _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ MA2303b virescens Eudesme Haemescharia _ − [laminaria] _ _ _ _ _ _ MA2303c virescens hennedyi Eudesme _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ − fragile MA2303d virescens Stilophora _ _ _ _ _ _ Ralfsia verrucosa _ _ MA2303e tuberculosa Gracillaria _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ − fragile MA2303f gracillis [Liebmannia] _ _ _ _ _ _ Ralfsia verrucosa Laminaria − _ MA2303g leveillei Eudesme _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ MA2321 virescens Eudesme _ _ _ _ _ _ Petrocelis _ _ MA2312 virescens Table 2 continued RT1011 RT1012 RT1013 RT1014 RT1015 RT1016 RT1017 RT1018 RT1019 RT1020 Odonthalia Acrosiphonia Bostrychia Cryptopleura Hincksia Blidingia Ulva Colpomenia Palmaria Lab Code Phycodrys rubens dentata arcta scorpioides ramosa granulosa minima pseudocurvata peregrina palmata _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Petalonia fascia _ _ MA2310 _ _ _ _ _ Ulva intestinalis _ _ Leathesia marina _ MA2303a Leathesia _ _ _ _ _ Ulva intestinalis _ _ _ MA2303b difformis _ _ _ _ _ Ulva prolifera _ _ Leathesia marina _ MA2303c _ _ _ _ _ Ulva intestinalis _ _ Leathesia marina _ MA2303d Leathesia _ _ _ _ [Giffordia] − _ _ _ _ MA2303e difformis Punctaria _ _ _ _ [Hinksia] − _ _ _ MA2303f latifolia _ _ _ _ [Hinksia] − Ulva prolifera _ _ Leathesia marina _ MA2303g Cladophora Pilayella Punctaria Leathesia _ _ _ _ _ MA2321 dalmatica littoralis latifolia difformis Cladophora _ _ _ [Hinksia] − _ _ − linza Leathesia marina _ MA2312 albida 6 5 4 Genus Species 3 2 1 Number of incorrect species genera or species incorrect of Number 0 MA2310 MA2312 MA2321 MA2303f MA2303c MA2303g MA2303a MA2303e MA2303b MA2303d Figure 1: The number of differences from the AQC identification of intertidal macroalgae specimens for each of the participants for RT10, arranged in order of increasing number of differences. Detailed breakdown of specimen identifications RT1001 – Dilsea carnosa (Figure 2) No generic and no specific differences recorded. Fig. 2. Dilsea carnosa (RT1001) RT1002 – Litosiphon laminariae (Figure 3) No generic and one specific difference recorded: Lab 03a identified as L. alariae (this species does not exist and it is suspected this identification is an error). Lab 03c incorrectly spelt the species. Fig. 3. Litosiphon laminariae (RT1002) RT1003 – Prasiola stipitata (Figure 4a) No generic and one specific difference recorded: Lab 10 identified as P. furfuracea. (this species typically has a much broader frond usually as long as wide (Fig 4b) where as P. stipitata has a much narrower frond often with holdfasts joined in a common base). Fig. 4a. Prasiola stipitata (RT1003) Fig 4b. Prasiola furfuracea RT1004 – Phyllophora pseudoceranoides (Figure 5) No generic and no specific differences recorded. Fig. 5. Phyllophora pseudoceranoides (RT1004) RT1005 – Chaetomorpha ligustica (Figure 6) No generic and no specific differences recorded. Fig. 6. Chaetomorpha ligustica (RT1005) RT1006 – Fucus vesiculosus (Figure 7) No generic and no specific differences recorded. Fig. 7. Fucus vesiculosus (RT1006) RT1007 – Mesogloia vermiculata (Figure 8a) Eight generic and nine specific differences recorded. Labs 03b, 03c, 03d, 21 and 12 identified as Eudesme virescens (M. vermiculata is highly and irregularly branched with a medulla of irregularly shaped filaments (figs 8a and b), E. virescens is predominantly branched along the main axis with a medulla consisting of long, regularly shaped and often dichotomously branched filaments (figs 8c and d). Fig. 8a. Mesogloia vermiculata (RT1007) Fig 8b. Mesogloia vermiculata medulla Fig 8c. Eudesme virescens Fig 8d. Eudesme virescens medulla Lab 03a identified as M. leveillei (currently known as Liebmannia leveille) and lab 03g identified as Liebmannia leveillei (this species resembles M. vermiculata in habit and structure but is cartilaginous in texture compared with the gelatinous texture of M. vermiculata (Newton, 1931) as described in the accompanying descriptive notes). Lab 03e identified as Stilophora tuberculosa and lab 03f identified as Gracillaria gracilis (neither of these species are gelatinous in texture). Fig 8e. Gracillaria gracilis RT1008 – Cruoria pellita (Figure 9a) Five generic and five specific differences recorded. Lab 03c identified as Haemescharia hennedyi (previously known as Petrocelis hennedyi) and lab 12 identified as Petrocelis (these species are typically <450um thick compared with Cruoria which is >500um as seen in fig 9a). Lab 23 identified as Mastocarpus stellatus (this species is a large cartilaginous species with erect fronds and not a crust, as seen in fig 9b). Labs 03e and 03g identified as Ralfsia verrucosa (this species is a Phaeophyta species (fig 9c)). Fig. 9a. Cruoria pellita (RT1008) Fig 9b. Mastocarpus stellatus Fig 9c. Ralfsia verrucosa (photo taken from Algaebase) RT1009 – Saccharina latissima (Figure 10) One generic and no specific differences recorded. Lab 03g identified as Laminaria latissima (Laminaria saccharina is a synonym of Saccharina latissima however using a previous Genus synonym and the current Species name was considered unacceptable within the test as this does not exist as a species in its own right). Fig. 10. Saccharina latissima (RT1009) RT1010 – Codium fragile subsp. fragile (Figure 11) No generic and two specific differences recorded. Labs 03d and 03f did not identify to subspecies level. There are two subspecies within Codium fragile which can be differentiated, amongst other characteristics, on the length of the mucron. Fig. 11. Codium fragile subsp. fragile (RT1010) RT1011 – Odonthalia dentata (Figure 12) No generic and no specific differences recorded. Fig. 12. Odonthalia dentata (RT1011) RT1012 – Acrosiphonia arcta (Figure 13a) Two generic and two specific differences recorded. Lab 21 identified as Cladophora dalmatica and lab 12 identified as Cladophora albida (this Genus does not display the distinct pyrenoids as seen in Acrosiphonia arcta (fig 13b) and C.albida has narrow, rounded apical cells and a distinctly different branching pattern). Fig. 13a. Acrosiphonia arcta (RT1012) Fig 13b. Cladophora albida RT1013 – Bostrychia scorpioides (Figure 14) No generic and no specific differences recorded. Fig. 14. Bostrychia scorpioides (RT1013) RT1014 – Cryptopleura ramosa (Figure 15) No generic and no specific differences recorded. Fig. 15. Cryptopleura ramosa (RT1014) RT1015 – Hincksia granulosa (Figure 16) One generic and one specific difference recorded. Lab 21 identified as Pilayella littoralis (this species has intercalary sporangia as seen in fig 16b compared with the spherical shaped sporangia of Hincksia sp. which appear as side branches). Lab 03e used the synonym Giffordia granulosa which was accepted. Labs 03f and 21 incorrectly spelt the genus name. Fig. 16a. Hincksia granulosa (RT1015) Fig. 16b. Pilayella littoralis RT1016 – Blidingia minima (Figure 17a) Five generic and five specific differences recorded. Labs 03a, 03b and 03d identified as Ulva intestinalis (this species has much larger cells, 8-20 um (-30) with the hood shaped chloroplast located at the apical end of the cell as seen in Fig 17b compared with Blidingia minima with cells 5-10um and plastids filling the cell). Labs 03c and 03g identified as Ulva prolifera (this species also has much larger cells, 10-22um (-35), which tend to be regularly arranged unlike those of Blidingia minima). Fig. 17a. Blidingia minima (RT1016) Fig 17b. Ulva intestinalis Fig 17c. Ulva prolifera RT1017 – Phycodrys rubens (Figure 18) No generic and no specific differences recorded. Fig. 18. Phycodrys rubens (RT1017) RT1018 – Ulva pseudocurvata (Figure 19) Three generic and four specific differences recorded. Labs 03f and 21 identified as Punctaria
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Zernov's Phyllophora Field) at the Beginning of the 21St Century
    Ecologica Montenegrina 39: 92-108 (2021) This journal is available online at: www.biotaxa.org/em http://dx.doi.org/10.37828/em.2021.39.11 Structure of the macrozoobenthos assemblages in the central part of the northwestern Black Sea shelf (Zernov's Phyllophora field) at the beginning of the 21st century NIKOLAI K. REVKOV1* & NATALIA A. BOLTACHOVA1 1 A.O. Kovalevsky Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas of RAS; 2, Nakhimov ave., Sevastopol 299011, Russia *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Received 24 December 2020 │ Accepted by V. Pešić: 11 February 2021 │ Published online 16 February 2021. Abstract In the first half of the 20th century, there was an extensive biocoenosis of the unattached red algae Phyllophora crispa on the mussel muds of the central section of the Black Sea’s northwestern shelf, which is known as Zernov’s Phyllophora Field (ZPF). At that time, the area of ZPF was approximately 11000 km2. More than a century after the description of ZPF, long-term changes in its phyto- and zoobenthos have been noted. A period of ecological crisis of the Black Sea ecosystem during the second half of the 20th century was destructive for the phytobenthos of ZPF, with the complete degradation of unattached Phyllophora biocoenosis. In contrast, after a sharp decline in the quantitative development of macrozoobenthos of the soft bottoms in the 1970s, its recovery to pre-crisis levels in the 2010s was noted. Despite the difference in the aforementioned phyto- and zoobenthos dynamics, habitat in the 4025 km² area of the botanical sanctuary of national importance “Zernov’s Phyllophora Field” was recognised as Critically Endangered (CR) within the European Red List of Habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Composition, Seasonal Occurrence, Distribution and Reproductive Periodicity of the Marine Rhodophyceae in New Hampshire
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Doctoral Dissertations Student Scholarship Spring 1969 COMPOSITION, SEASONAL OCCURRENCE, DISTRIBUTION AND REPRODUCTIVE PERIODICITY OF THE MARINE RHODOPHYCEAE IN NEW HAMPSHIRE EDWARD JAMES HEHRE JR. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation Recommended Citation HEHRE, EDWARD JAMES JR., "COMPOSITION, SEASONAL OCCURRENCE, DISTRIBUTION AND REPRODUCTIVE PERIODICITY OF THE MARINE RHODOPHYCEAE IN NEW HAMPSHIRE" (1969). Doctoral Dissertations. 897. https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation/897 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This dissertation has been microfilmed exactly as received 70-2076 HEHRE, J r., Edward Jam es, 1940- COMPOSITION, SEASONAL OCCURRENCE, DISTRIBUTION AND REPRODUCTIVE PERIODICITY OF THE MARINE RHODO- PHYCEAE IN NEW HAMPSHIRE. University of New Hampshire, Ph.D., 1969 Botany University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, M ichigan COMPOSITION, SEASONAL OCCURRENCE, DISTRIBUTION AND REPRODUCTIVE PERIODICITY OF THE MARINE RHODOPHYCEAE IN NEW HAMPSHIRE TV EDWARD J^HEHRE, JR. B. S., New England College, 1963 A THESIS Submitted to the University of New Hampshire In Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements f o r the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate School Department of Botany June, 1969 This thesis has been examined and approved. Thesis director, Arthur C. Mathieson, Assoc. Prof. of Botany Thomas E. Furman, Assoc. P rof. of Botany Albion R. Hodgdon, P rof. of Botany Charlotte G.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Benthic Algae New to South Africa
    Marine benthic algae new to South Africa R.E. Norris and M.E. Aken Department of Botany, University of Natal, Pietermaritzburg Twenty species of Rhodophyta that have not previously Introduction been recorded for South Africa have been found on the coast of Natal. All but six species are new to the East Our studies on the benthic marine algae of Natal have re­ African region, but have been recorded from other distant vealed taxa that have not been recorded before for South regions of the world. It is particularly noteworthy that Africa's coast. Some of the species and genera are only known fifteen of the twenty species were previously known to from shores distant from South Africa and it is mainly this occur in Australia, six of the fifteen not having been found group of species on which we now report. The twenty species anywhere but in Australia before this time. An additional species, Dasyclonium incisum, has been known to occur selected all belong to the Rhodophyta and many are species only in Australia and New Zealand before this report. Two that have rarely been found. For this reason we are able to species, Anotrichium tenue and Wrange/ia argus, are add not only new rec.:urds in a region remote from where they probably pan-tropical to subtropical species and a few have previously been found, tt,Jt we are also able to add to others such as Ha/ymenia dilatata, Sebdenia polydactyla, the knowledge of several specih on details of their structure Symphyoc/adia marchantioides and Pterosiphonia spinifera may eventually be shown to belong in a similar category.
    [Show full text]
  • ECONOMIC SEAWEEDS with Reference to Some Pacificspecies Volume IV
    CU I MR-M- 91 003 C2 TAXONOMY OF ECONOMIC SEAWEEDS With reference to some Pacificspecies Volume IV Isabella A. Abbott, Editor A Publication of the California Sea Grant College CALI FOHN IA, SEA GRANT Rosemary Amidei Communications Coordi nator SeaGrant is a uniquepartnership of public andprivate sectors, combining research, education, and technologytransfer for public service.It is a nationalnetwork of universitiesmeeting changingenvironmental and economic needs of peoplein our coastal,ocean, and Great Lakes regions. Publishedby the California SeaGrant College, University of California, La Jolla, California, 1994.Publication No. T-CSGCP-031.Additional copiesare availablefor $10 U.S.! each, prepaid checkor moneyorder payable to "UC Regents"! from: California SeaGrant College, University of California, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0232.19! 534-4444. This work is fundedin part by a grantfrom the National SeaGrant College Program, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Departmentof Commerce,under grant number NA89AA-D-SG138, project number A/P-I, and in part by the California State ResourcesAgency. The views expressedherein are those of the authorsand do not necessarily reflect the views of NOAA, or any of its subagencies.The U.S. Governmentis authorizedto produceand distributereprints for governmentalpurposes. Published on recycled paper. Publication: February 1994 TAXONOMY OF ECONOMIC SEAWEEDS With reference to some Pacificspecies Volume IV isabella A. Abbott, Editor Results of an international workshop sponsored by the California Sea Grant College in cooperation with the Pacific Sea Grant College Programs of Alaska, Hawaii, Oregon, and Washington and hosted by Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan, July 1991. A Publication of the California Sea Grant College Report No.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation and Protection of the Black Sea Biodiversity
    Conservation and Protection of the Black Sea Biodiversity Review of the existing and planned protected areas in the Black Sea (Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey) with a special focus on possible deficiencies regarding law enforcement and implementation of management plans EC DG Env. Project MISIS: No. 07.020400/2012/616044/SUB/D2 2012 This document has been prepared with the financial assistance of EC DG Environment. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of EC DG Environment. The opinions expressed are those of the authors. Any errors or omissions are responsibility of the authors and should be reported to them accordingly. Contact details for sending comments on the Report: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] For bibliographic purposes this document may be cited as: Begun T., Muresan M., Zaharia T., Dencheva K., Sezgin M., Bat L., Velikova V., 2012. Conservation and Protection of the Black Sea Biodiversity. Review of the existing and planned protected areas in the Black Sea (Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey) with a special focus on possible deficiencies regarding law enforcement and implementation of management plans. EC DG Env. MISIS Project Deliverables. www.misisproject.eu This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the authors, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. The authors would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this report as a source of information. 2 Table of Contents List of Tables ........................................................................................................................................... 5 List of Figures .......................................................................................................................................... 5 Acronyms and Abbreviations ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rhodymenia Holmesii
    Salhi et al. Marine Biodiversity Records (2016) 9:62 DOI 10.1186/s41200-016-0068-8 MARINE RECORD Open Access First record of Rhodymenia holmesii (Rhodymeniaceae, Rhodophyta) for the Mediterranean Sea from Morocco Ghizlane Salhi1*, Mustapha Hassoun1, Hanaa Moussa1, Hanaa Zbakh1,2 and Hassane Riadi1 Abstract Background: The rhodymenialean red algal species Rhodymenia holmesii was collected in the lower intertidal zones from Dalya and Al-Hoceima (Northern Morocco, Mediterranean Sea). This represents the first record and description in the Mediterranean Sea. Results: Moroccan materiel was studied in detail and compared with other closely related species. Descriptions of the morphological features reveal thalli with flaccid blades, 8 cm long, regularly dichotomously branched and attached with stoloniferous holdfast. Anatomically, cortical region composed of 2–3 cell layers and medulla composed of 3–5 cell layers. Conclusions: This finding indicates that the biodiversity of the related sites is probably richer than generally thought, and other phycological studies will increase the known algal biodiversity of the region. Keywords: First record, Mediterranean Sea, Morocco, Red algae, Rhodymenia holmesii Background basal disc or stolons, blades flattened, simple or divided The genus Rhodomenia (sic) was proposed by Greville in dichotomously, palmately or irregularly; sometimes with 1830 and included 16 species. Later, other species were marginal or apical proliferations; structure multiaxial, added by J. Agardh (1841) who changed the concept of medulla compact, pseudoparenchymatous, with large ax- the genus to adopt the suggestion of Montagne (1839) ially elongated cells, cortex of radial filaments of 2–5 regarding the ratification of the orthography Rhodymenia smaller cells. Gametangial plant dioecious; spermatangia (J.
    [Show full text]
  • Colección De Tipos De Algas Marinas Del Herbario Del Museo Oceanológico Hermano Benigno Román (Mobr)
    ACTA BOT. VENEZ. 32 (1): 225-236. 2009 225 COLECCIÓN DE TIPOS DE ALGAS MARINAS DELHERBARIO DELMUSEO OCEANOLÓGICO HERMANO BENIGNO ROMÁN (MOBR) Marine algal type collection from the herbarium of Museo Oceanológico Hermano Benigno Román (MOBR) María A. SOLÉ Estación de Investigaciones Marinas de Margarita Fundación La Salle de Ciencias Naturales Apartado 144, Porlamar 6301. Isla de Margarita, Venezuela [email protected] RESUMEN Se presenta el catálogo de la colección de tipos de macroalgas marinas depositadas en el Herbario del Museo Oceanológico Hermano Benigno Román (MOBR) de la Estación de Investigaciones Marinas de Margarita, Fundación La Salle de Ciencias Naturales. La colec- ción incluye 21 especímenes designados como tipos en distintas categorías (holótipos, isóti- pos, parátipos y topótipos) los cuales representan la referencia nomenclatural de 16 taxa. Se señala la categoría de cada tipo, sinopsis de la información contenida en las etiquetas de los especímenes y figuras seleccionadas. Palabras clave:Algas marinas, colección tipo, Herbario MOBR ABSTRACT A catalogue of type specimens of marine macroalgae held in the Herbarium of the Mu- seo Oceanológico Hermano Benigno Román at the Estación de Investigaciones Marinas de Margarita, Fundación La Salle de Ciencias Naturales is provided. The collection includes 21 specimens designated as types in differents categories (holotype, isotype, paratype and to- potype) which represent the nomenclatural reference of 16 taxa. The category of each type, a synthesis of the information held in the specific labels and selected figures are indicated. Key words: Herbarium MOBR, marine algae, type collection INTRODUCCIÓN Las colecciones existentes en los museos de historia natural suelen ser la base de numerosos estudios de sistemática, taxonomía, ecología y biogeografía de diversos taxa.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Algal Flora of Flores and Corvo Islands, Azores
    Biodiversity Data Journal 9: e60929 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.9.e60929 Data Paper Marine algal flora of Flores and Corvo Islands, Azores Ana I Azevedo Neto‡, Manuela I. Parente§, Ian Tittley |, Robert L. Fletcher¶, William Farnham¶, Ana C. Costa§, Andrea Z. Botelho§, Sandra Monteiro§, Roberto Resendes#, Pedro Afonso ¤, Afonso C.L. Prestes‡«, Nuno V. Álvaro , David Mila-Figueras¤, Raul M. A. Neto», José M. N. Azevedo‡‡, Ignacio Moreu ‡ cE3c - Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes/Azorean Biodiversity Group, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Departamento de Biologia, Universidade dos Açores, 9500-321 Ponta Delgada, Açores, Portugal § CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Pólo dos Açores, Universidade dos Açores, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Departamento de Biologia, 9500-321 Ponta Delgada, Açores, Portugal | Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, Code SW7 5BD, United Kingdom ¶ Institute of Marine Sciences, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Ferry Road, Eastney, Portsmouth, PO4 9LY, United Kingdom # Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Departamento de Biologia, Universidade dos Açores, 9500-321 Ponta Delgada, Açores, Portugal ¤ IMAR/Okeanos, Departamento de Oceanografia e Pescas, Universidade dos Açores, Rua Prof. Doutor Frederico Machado, 9901-862 Horta, Açores, Portugal « CCMMG (Centro do Clima Meteorologia e Mudanças Globais) & IITA-A (Instituto de Investigação e Tecnologias Agrárias e do Ambiente), Universidade dos Açores,
    [Show full text]
  • Unihi-Seagrant-Bb-90-04
    UNIHI-SEAGRANT-BB-90-04 .. .( , , _ R,@�emaryAmide i . - · · , · Cpmmunication�, Coordinafor· \ ,.... .:.r /. '.; ' ' ·, 11 • t • \ I .- '' ' r - ; ' • • 1 I I Sea Grant is� unique Bar:tne�shipi:Jf' pu 91ic �n9 pFivaJf§�ctq���, coiritiiningre��arGh, ed�catitm� : and technology· transfer,for•puolic service,. It is a national net,work_·of univ..ersities·ineeting , . changing enyironrnental'anct ·econotnie'n,e·eM' of feople 'iQ our coastal,· ocean,,- - .-� and' /Grea(L ,. illi:es. • " , 1- ',.I r�gibn��' · · , . : -,·' • .(. • · �ubllshed by the;,California 1�ea dr��t ��llege,.UNv�r.s:ty,of �aiif9mi�, L� �.©ni, �a�ifmin\�, . - 1994,,Publication'No: T-CS9CP-0�1. AdditionaJ copie's· are.,alajlable' for.$1!} (U.SJ each,,. m !6. , ·, prep�d �check money·o'r��r p�yable ''Uf:�egent� ; ).from: CaliforniaSea Grru-;tCdllege ,· (6� .. University of 'Caljfornl'a, �500·GilmitnDrive, 1'.aJona: CA "9�09J!023z.' 9) 5�4��1444:.� , .. .·, . " .... ·.: ,/-.,-··� .1.::.,. " ..... :,,' ( :1 ' • • . ..·",_ ", ,- " "' -'J '_ This worR is funded in. _part by a grant from the National �e'mGrailt Coll�ge·Progr,arp1 National .. ::. , ·Oceanic· �n� Atm'ospµeriC Admini'stmtioi},, U.S'.. Department; of; Comll)er�e�· m1der ·grant · th'e i;iumber Nrt89AJ\-P-�01.38, projed nun;iber A/P.J, a�a' in. -part ,by Galifot]!a State. _ are • Resour.ces Agency'. Tlie views expressed herein thbse. e.'fthe authors· and do1i10tnet:essaijiy · ·' the re':filect vi�ws o.f NC>A:A,;�{(lp.y of its, s'uoagencies" .The U.S. G0verrirnends authorized to\ - . · � •;'--.. · .-. " '', 1,. p�odu�e,and di triJ?tite repFil)�s. for.go�ern��ntal puTp�ses,. .. ,...-... "\;, � �:�' - '• I 1 · (ol, p : JJ-u� 'b lish'ed on;recycled " .
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological Species Concept Portfolios Northeast Algal Society Phycology Lab Manual
    Northeast Algal Society Phycology Lab Manual Lab Activity: Tools and Concepts for Exploring Algal Biodiversity: Using Dichotomous Keys in Reverse to understand the Morphological Species Concept Developed by: Dr. Brian Wysor, Roger Williams University, Department of Biology, Marine Biology & Environmental Science Contact: [email protected] Learning Objectives By the end of this laboratory activity, students should be able to: 1. Describe 3 criteria by which species can be differentiated from one another. 2. Define the biological and morphological species concepts and highlight the limitations of their application to different organismal groups. 3. Systematically compare the morphology of algae specimens to decide whether they constitute one or more than one species. 4. Use dichotomous keys to identify diagnostic morphological, cytological, anatomical, and/or reproductive characters useful for distinguishing species of algae. Assessment Method Students will produce 3 illustration sets that highlight diagnostic morphological features to distinguish one or more species. Instructor Notes Materials or supplies required: Macroalgae samples from one to two sites (can be collected by students if time permits, or as homework for students to bring to lab); plastic baggies for sample collection; waders and snorkeling gear, as appropriate; razor blades for preparing hand sections; microscope slides, coverslips and cytological stains, if used. Equipment required: Compound light microscopes (with camera, if available); seawater, sorting trays, thumb pipettes and watch bowls. Techniques required (those which are not taught during the activity but students must already have a working knowledge): Microscopy skills, hand sectioning, use of dichotomous keys. Time required: The basic laboratory activity can be completed in a single 2-3 hours laboratory period, but the development of the biodiversity portfolio project in which intra- and/or interspecies morphological variation is documented will be developed over the course of a 3-4 week laboratory sequence.
    [Show full text]
  • A Chronology of Middle Missouri Plains Village Sites
    Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press smithsonian contributions to botany • n u m b e r 9 4 Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press MarineA Chronology Algae of theof NorthernMiddle GulfMissouri of California: Plains ChlorophytaVillage Sites and Phaeophyceae By Craig M. Johnson withJames contributions N. Norris by Stanley A. Ahler, Herbert Haas, and Georges Bonani SerieS PublicationS of the SmithSonian inStitution Emphasis upon publication as a means of “diffusing knowledge” was expressed by the first Secretary of the Smithsonian. In his formal plan for the Institution, Joseph Henry outlined a program that included the following statement: “It is proposed to publish a series of reports, giving an account of the new discoveries in science, and of the changes made from year to year in all branches of knowledge.” This theme of basic research has been adhered to through the years by thousands of titles issued in series publications under the Smithsonian imprint, com- mencing with Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge in 1848 and continuing with the following active series: Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology Smithsonian Contributions to Botany Smithsonian Contributions to History and Technology Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to Museum Conservation Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology In these series, the Institution publishes small papers and full-scale monographs that report on the research and collections of its various museums and bureaus. The Smithsonian Contributions Series are distributed via mailing lists to libraries, universities, and similar institu- tions throughout the world. Manuscripts submitted for series publication are received by the Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press from authors with direct affilia- tion with the various Smithsonian museums or bureaus and are subject to peer review and review for compliance with manuscript preparation guidelines.
    [Show full text]
  • Antioxidant and Cytotoxic Activities of Phyllophora Pseudoceranoides (Gmelin) New
    FARMACIA, 2016, Vol. 64, 4 ORIGINAL ARTICLE ANTIOXIDANT AND CYTOTOXIC ACTIVITIES OF PHYLLOPHORA PSEUDOCERANOIDES (GMELIN) NEW. ET TAYL ADRIANA TRIFAN1*, DACIANA SAVA2, LAURA ADRIANA BUCUR3, COSMIN TEODOR MIHAI4, ANA CLARA APROTOSOAIE1, OANA CIOANCĂ1, MONICA HĂNCIANU1, ANCA MIRON1 1Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 16 Universitatii Street, 700115, Iasi, Romania 2Department of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, “Ovidius” University Constanta, 1 Universitatii Street, Campus, Building B, 900470, Constanta, Romania 3Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, “Ovidius” University Constanta, 1 Universitatii Street, Campus, Building B, 900470, Constanta, Romania 4Interdisciplinary Research Department-Field Science, “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University of Iasi, 11 Carol I Bd., 700506 Iasi, Romania *corresponding author: [email protected] Manuscript received: March 2016 Abstract The aim of the present study was to characterize and assess the in vitro antioxidant and cytotoxic activities of various solvent extracts from red alga Phyllophora pseudoceranoides. Bioactive compounds were extracted using solvents of different polarities. Total phenolic, flavonoid and carotenoid contents were also determined. Algal extracts displayed moderate 2,2- diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl hydrate (DPPH) scavenging activity, with values ranging from 12.99 ± 0.23 to 46.00 ± 0.13 % at a concentration of 1.99 mg/mL; all extracts showed good scavenging activity against 2,2'-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6- sulfonic acid) (ABTS) radical cation, with EC50 values ranging from 0.12 ± 0.02 to 0.49 ± 0.02 mg/mL. All investigated extracts exhibited strong cytotoxic activities against HeLa cells. The antioxidant and cytotoxic effects of P. pseudoceranoides extracts suggest their possible use in the development of nutraceuticals and functional foods.
    [Show full text]