DOCSLIB.ORG

A Fair Deal on Migration for the Uk

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Fair Deal on Migration for the Uk REPORT A FAIR DEAL ON MIGRATION FOR THE UK IPPR March 2014 © IPPR 2014 Institute for Public Policy Research ABOUT THE AUTHORS The research and authorship of this report was a joint effort by the Migration and Communities team at IPPR. The following people were involved: Alex Glennie, Alice Sachrajda, Jenny Pennington, Ipek Gencsu, Brhmie Balaram, Miklos Szilard, Phoebe Griffith, Sarah Mulley and Tim Finch. Freelance consultant Miranda Lewis also contributed. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We would like to thank a number of our IPPR colleagues (present and past) who contributed advice or particular areas of expertise to the report, including Dalia Ben-Galim, Graeme Cooke, Ed Cox, Jonathan Clifton, Kayte Lawton, Matt Cavanagh, Imogen Parker, Myriam Cherti, Nick Pearce and Tony Dolphin. We are very grateful to Unbound Philanthropy, the Barrow Cadbury Trust and the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust for their generous funding of IPPR’s Progressive Migration project, of which this report is the culmination. Many discussions informed this report, and we are particularly grateful to the members of our advisory group who helped to guide our thinking. They are: Alasdair Murray of Quiller Consultants, Ayesha Saran of Barrow Cadbury Trust, Professor Bernard Ryan of the University of Leicester, Bobby Duffy of Ipsos MORI, Ian Robinson of Fragomen, Jonathan Portes of NIESR, Naaz Coker, Sunder Katwala of British Future, Professor Shamit Saggar of the University of Sussex, and Will Somerville. We should stress that although we drew on the expertise and wisdom of the advisory group, the research and ideas presented in this report are IPPR’s own. Finally we would like to thank all the members of the public who participated in our four focus groups in Manchester and Gravesend, or who took part in the online survey which was carried out for IPPR by Ipsos MORI. ABOUT IPPR IPPR, the Institute for Public Policy Research, is the UK’s leading progressive thinktank. We are an independent charitable organisation with more than 40 staff members, paid interns and visiting fellows. Our main office is in London, with IPPR North, IPPR’s dedicated thinktank for the North of England, operating out of offices in Newcastle and Manchester. The purpose of our work is to assist all those who want to create a society where every citizen lives a decent and fulfilled life, in reciprocal relationships with the people they care about. We believe that a society of this sort cannot be legislated for or guaranteed by the state. And it certainly won’t be achieved by markets alone. It requires people to act together and take responsibility for themselves and each other. IPPR 4th Floor 14 Buckingham Street London WC2N 6DF T: +44 (0)20 7470 6100 E: [email protected] www.ippr.org Registered charity no. 800065 This paper was first published in March 2014. © 2014 The contents and opinions in this paper are the authors’ only. IDEAS to CHANGE OPINIONS CONTENTS Executive summary ......................................................................................................1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................9 The ‘crude restrictionist’ approach ..............................................................................9 Failed responses ........................................................................................................9 A new response .......................................................................................................10 1. Principles revisited .................................................................................................13 2. The state of the evidence .......................................................................................14 2.1 Limitations of the data ........................................................................................14 2.2 Summary of the numbers ....................................................................................14 2.3 The impact of migration on the UK economy .......................................................20 2.4 The impact of migration on UK welfare and public services ..................................24 2.5 The impact of migration on UK housing ...............................................................26 2.6 Impacts on society .............................................................................................27 2.7 Conclusions .......................................................................................................29 3. Understanding public opinion ................................................................................30 3.1 The cost–benefit frame .......................................................................................32 3.2 The fairness frame ..............................................................................................36 3.3 Conclusions .......................................................................................................41 4. A new Fair Deal on migration .................................................................................43 4.1 Managing migration to make it fair for everyone ...................................................43 4.2 Aligning migration policy with the wider aim of developing a stronger and fairer UK economy ............................................................................................................44 4.3 Migration policy in the wider context of economic reform .....................................46 4.4 A differentiated approach to managing migration .................................................47 4.5 Simplifying routes of entry ...................................................................................48 4.6 Attracting economic migrants who will contribute to the UK economy ..................... 50 4.7 Introducing a new UK worker training requirement ...............................................53 4.8 Annual migration flow reports ..............................................................................54 4.9 Reforming government management of migration ................................................55 4.10 Preserving free movement in the EU but protecting the UK from ‘shocks’ ...........56 4.11 Managing family migration .................................................................................58 4.12 Recognising the social and cultural impacts of migration ....................................60 4.13 Strengthening integration into British society......................................................60 4.14 Increasing immigrants’ ability (and responsibility) to speak English ......................61 i IPPR | A fair deal on migration for the UK 4.15 Supporting sites of integration ...........................................................................63 4.16 Encouraging settlement and citizenship .............................................................63 4.17 Supporting communities facing particular immigration pressures ........................65 4.18 Migration and fairer welfare ...............................................................................67 4.19 Limiting access to welfare benefits for newly arrived migrants .............................67 4.20 Levying an upfront contribution from migrants for use of free public services ......68 4.21 Limiting migrants’ access to shortage housing ...................................................69 4.22 Greater local control over other aspects of housing ............................................70 4.23 Constructing a fair asylum process ....................................................................71 4.24 Irregular immigration .........................................................................................73 4.25 Conclusion .......................................................................................................74 References .................................................................................................................75 ii IPPR | A fair deal on migration for the UK EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In this report we set out a new, comprehensive progressive position on migration, which we call the ‘Fair Deal’. The report crystallises IPPR’s thinking on this issue as it has developed over the last five years. It springs from two important observations. First, despite strenuous efforts by successive governments to reduce migration, there are no signs that we will see a return to the low levels of migration of the mid-1990s. Rather, the relatively high levels of the last 20 years are likely to be the norm for the foreseeable future. Second, despite the failure of what we term ‘crude restrictionism’ – that is, trying to reduce migration by whatever means and at whatever cost – other responses to this dominant narrative have failed to win over mainstream public opinion and therefore open up space in which politicians can pursue more rational and coherent migration policies. Within the Fair Deal we endeavour to be both realistic about the world we live in and ambitious about the society we want to create. The world is increasingly interconnected and characterised by the movement of capital, goods, services, knowledge – and people. Prosperity is spreading, but far from evenly; and while progress is being made, the world remains beset by multiple and frequent crises. UK society remains relatively open, tolerant, dynamic and humane. The majority of people in the country recognise that our future depends on being competitive in world
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Truman, Congress and the Struggle for War and Peace In
    TRUMAN, CONGRESS AND THE STRUGGLE FOR WAR AND PEACE IN KOREA A Dissertation by LARRY WAYNE BLOMSTEDT Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 2008 Major Subject: History TRUMAN, CONGRESS AND THE STRUGGLE FOR WAR AND PEACE IN KOREA A Dissertation by LARRY WAYNE BLOMSTEDT Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved by: Chair of Committee, Terry H. Anderson Committee Members, Jon R. Bond H. W. Brands John H. Lenihan David Vaught Head of Department, Walter L. Buenger May 2008 Major Subject: History iii ABSTRACT Truman, Congress and the Struggle for War and Peace in Korea. (May 2008) Larry Wayne Blomstedt, B.S., Texas State University; M.S., Texas A&M University-Kingsville Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Terry H. Anderson This dissertation analyzes the roles of the Harry Truman administration and Congress in directing American policy regarding the Korean conflict. Using evidence from primary sources such as Truman’s presidential papers, communications of White House staffers, and correspondence from State Department operatives and key congressional figures, this study suggests that the legislative branch had an important role in Korean policy. Congress sometimes affected the war by what it did and, at other times, by what it did not do. Several themes are addressed in this project. One is how Truman and the congressional Democrats failed each other during the war. The president did not dedicate adequate attention to congressional relations early in his term, and was slow to react to charges of corruption within his administration, weakening his party politically.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Twenty-Six the Cold War, 1945–1952
    CHAPTER TWENTY-SIX THE COLD WAR, 1945–1952 CHAPTER OVERVIEW This chapter covers the beginnings of the Cold War under the Truman presidency as it affected both foreign and domestic policies. Peace after World War II was marred by a return to the 1917 rivalry of the United States and the Soviet Union. Truman and his advisors introduced the basic Cold War policies of containment in the Truman Doctrine, the Marshall Plan and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. With the victory of the communists in China and the outbreak of the Korean War, America extended the Cold War to Asia as well. The Cold War prompted the U.S. to rebuild its World War II enemies, Germany and Japan, as counterweights to the Soviets. At home, Americans wanted to return to normal by bringing the troops back home, spending for consumer goods and re-establishing family life, but many changing social patterns brought anxieties. A second Red Scare was caused by the Cold War rhetoric of a bipartisan foreign policy and Truman’s loyalty program, but Senator Joseph McCarthy’s tactics symbolized the era. Defense spending increased and the American economy became depend- ent on it to maintain recovery. Truman tried to extend elements of the New Deal in his Fair Deal but with minimal success. CHAPTER OBJECTIVES After reading the chapter and following the study suggestions given, students should be able to: 1. Illustrate the effects of the Red Scare by discussing the college campus community after World War II. 2. Trace the development of the American policy of containment as applied to Europe and to Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservative Movement
    Conservative Movement How did the conservative movement, routed in Barry Goldwater's catastrophic defeat to Lyndon Johnson in the 1964 presidential campaign, return to elect its champion Ronald Reagan just 16 years later? What at first looks like the political comeback of the century becomes, on closer examination, the product of a particular political moment that united an unstable coalition. In the liberal press, conservatives are often portrayed as a monolithic Right Wing. Close up, conservatives are as varied as their counterparts on the Left. Indeed, the circumstances of the late 1980s -- the demise of the Soviet Union, Reagan's legacy, the George H. W. Bush administration -- frayed the coalition of traditional conservatives, libertarian advocates of laissez-faire economics, and Cold War anti- communists first knitted together in the 1950s by William F. Buckley Jr. and the staff of the National Review. The Reagan coalition added to the conservative mix two rather incongruous groups: the religious right, primarily provincial white Protestant fundamentalists and evangelicals from the Sunbelt (defecting from the Democrats since the George Wallace's 1968 presidential campaign); and the neoconservatives, centered in New York and led predominantly by cosmopolitan, secular Jewish intellectuals. Goldwater's campaign in 1964 brought conservatives together for their first national electoral effort since Taft lost the Republican nomination to Eisenhower in 1952. Conservatives shared a distaste for Eisenhower's "modern Republicanism" that largely accepted the welfare state developed by Roosevelt's New Deal and Truman's Fair Deal. Undeterred by Goldwater's defeat, conservative activists regrouped and began developing institutions for the long haul.
    [Show full text]
  • Harry S. Truman and the Fight Against Racial Discrimination
    “Everything in My Power”: Harry S. Truman and the Fight Against Racial Discrimination by Joseph Pierro Thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in History Peter Wallenstein, Chairman Crandall Shifflett Daniel B. Thorp 3 May 2004 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: civil rights, discrimination, equality, race, segregation, Truman “Everything in My Power”: Harry S. Truman and the Fight Against Racial Discrimination by Joseph Pierro Abstract Any attempt to tell the story of federal involvement in the dismantling of America’s formalized systems of racial discrimination that positions the judiciary as the first branch of government to engage in this effort, identifies the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision as the beginning of the civil rights movement, or fails to recognize the centrality of President Harry S. Truman in the narrative of racial equality is in error. Driven by an ever-increasing recognition of the injustices of racial discrimination, Truman offered a comprehensive civil rights program to Congress on 2 February 1948. When his legislative proposals were rejected, he employed a unilateral policy of action despite grave political risk, and freed subsequent presidential nominees of the Democratic party from its southern segregationist bloc by winning re-election despite the States’ Rights challenge of Strom Thurmond. The remainder of his administration witnessed a multi-faceted attack on prejudice involving vetoes, executive orders, public pronouncements, changes in enforcement policies, and amicus briefs submitted by his Department of Justice. The southern Democrat responsible for actualizing the promises of America’s ideals of freedom for its black citizens is Harry Truman, not Lyndon Johnson.
    [Show full text]
  • 1950'S Presentation
    Truman’s Fair Deal: • 81st Congress did not embrace his deal • Did raise minimum wage from 40 to 75 cents/hr • Repeal of Taft-Hartley Act: a law that restricted labor unions • Approved expansion of Social Security coverage and raised Social Security benefits • Passed National Housing Act of 1949; provided housing for low-income families and increased Federal Housing Administration mortgage insurance. • Did NOT pass national health insurance or to provide CHAPTERS 18 & 19 subsidies for farmers or federal aid for schools 1 2 Truman’s Fair Deal: GI Bill: • Fair Deal was an extension of FDR’s New ’ Deal but he did not have the support in • Official name: Servicemen s congress FDR did. Readjustment Act • Congress felt they were too expensive, too • Provided generous loans to veterans to restrictive to business and economy in help them establish businesses, buy general. homes, & attend college • Majority of both houses for Congress were • New housing was more affordable Republican; Truman is a Democrat during the postwar period than at any other time in American history. • Still in use today!! 3 4 1 22nd Amendment to the U.S. THE COLD WAR Constitution 1951 •CONFLICT BETWEEN THE U.S.S.R. & THE • No person shall be elected to the office of the UNITED STATES WHICH BEGAN AFTER WWII President more than twice, and no person who IN RESPONSE TO COMMUNIST EXPANSION. has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to •COMMUNISM WAS SEEN AS A MORTAL which some other person was elected President THREAT TO THE EXISTENCE OF THE shall be elected to the office of the President WESTERN DEMOCRATIC TRADITION.
    [Show full text]
  • “Benefit Tourism” and Migration Policy in the UK
    “Benefit Tourism” and Migration Policy in the U.K.: The Construction of Policy Narratives Meghan Luhman Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Political Science Johns Hopkins University [email protected] February 2015 Draft Prepared for EUSA Conference March 5­7, 2015, Boston, MA. Please do not cite or circulate without author’s permission. 1 I. Introduction In 2004, ten new member states, eight from Central and Eastern Europe (the so­called “A8” countries), joined the European Union. European Union citizens have the right to freely move throughout and reside in (subject to conditions) all member states. At the time, though thirteen out of fifteen existing E.U. member states put temporary restrictions on migrants from these new member states, the U.K. decided to give these migrants immediate full access to the labor market. While in France, for example, fears about the “Polish plumber” taking French jobs became a hot topic of debate and caused the French to implement temporary controls, in the U.K. Tony Blair highlighted “the opportunities of accession” to fill in gaps in the U.K. economy (T​he Guardian, 2​7 April 2004). Blair’s Conservative opponents had also largely supported enlargement in the 1990s, noting the expansion of the E.U. would increase trade and “encourage stability and prosperity” (HC Deb 21 May 2003 vol 405 cc1021). The U.K. was hailed by members of the European Parliament as welcoming, and in spite of some fears of strain on social services and benefits, studies showed that the migrants had been a net benefit for the U.K.
    [Show full text]
  • Ch.41 – Peace, Prosperity, Progress EQ
    Ch.41 – Peace, Prosperity, Progress EQ: Why are the 1950s remembered as an age of affluence? 41.0: Preview (answer in IAN) 40.1: Coach Schroeder reads introduction 40.2-7: Read Textbook – create a chart. 40.2-7: Cut out Picture – Create a Headline – Use example on your handout. Only have to do 2 BULLETS, BUT AS USUAL I WILL BE DOING ALL OF THEM. Section 2: POSTWAR POLITICS: READJUSTMENTS AND CHALLENGES Postwar Politics: Readjustments and Headline: Challenges; Truman Battles a Republican Congress • Truman has announced a set of reforms called the Fair Deal, including calls to raise the minimum wage and enact a national health insurance program. • With rising prices and growing unemployment, workers in major industries are calling for wage increases and are striking if their demands are not met. • In response to the strikes, Congress has passed the Taft-Hartley Act, limiting the power of labor unions. • The Taft-Hartley Act outlaws the closed shop, or a workplace in which the employer agrees to hire only members of a certain union. It also bans sympathy strikes by other unions. An Upset Victory in 1948 Headline: • Truman’s whistle-stop tour has helped him win reelection in a narrow victory over Thomas Dewey. • Most of Truman’s Fair Deal reforms have been blocked by Congress. • Congress has enacted Truman’s proposal to raise the minimum wage and to promote slum clearance. Ike Take the Middle of the Road Headline: • The nation has decided they “like Ike” and his modern Republicanism program, since they voted him into office.
    [Show full text]
  • How Labour Wins Mapping the Routes to the Next Majority
    Fabian Review www.fabians.org.uk Spring 2012 HOW LABOUR WINS Mapping the routes to the next majority The quarterly magazine of the Fabian Society Volume 124 no 1 £4.95 THE FABIAN SUMMER CONFERENCE Featuring a Q&A with Ed Miliband LABOUR'S next majority 30th June, 10am doors open for an 11am start finishing at around 5pm Millbank Media Centre, Ground Floor, Millbank Tower, 21–24 Millbank, London, SW1P 4QP Tickets for members and concessions are just £10 (£15 for non-members with six months free membership) Come and join the Fabians for our Summer Conference featuring a Question and Answer session with Ed Miliband. Debate Labour’s electoral strategy and put forward your take on some of the ideas we’ve explored in this issue of the Fabian Review. To book your tickets head to www.fabians.org.uk or call 020 7227 4900 EDITORIAL Image: Adrian Teal Age-old lessons Andrew Harrop asks if ongoing public support for pensioner benefits offers the left a way out of its welfare impasse If the polls are to be believed, benefits for pensioners (of which the the poorest get more – which the coali- cutting welfare is very popular. YouGov much-castigated winter fuel payment tion is busy unpicking though its tax reports that fewer than a third of and free bus pass make up just a tiny credit cuts. Labour voters and just 3 per cent of fraction). On top there is a generous A shared system, where every family Conservatives oppose it. This places the means-tested system which has done is a recipient, could open the way for left in a terrible bind, not least because much to reduce pensioner poverty.
    [Show full text]
  • New Deal Nemesis the “Old Right” Jeffersonians
    SUBSCRIBE NOW AND RECEIVE CRISIS AND LEVIATHAN* FREE! “The Independent Review does not accept “The Independent Review is pronouncements of government officials nor the excellent.” conventional wisdom at face value.” —GARY BECKER, Noble Laureate —JOHN R. MACARTHUR, Publisher, Harper’s in Economic Sciences Subscribe to The Independent Review and receive a free book of your choice* such as the 25th Anniversary Edition of Crisis and Leviathan: Critical Episodes in the Growth of American Government, by Founding Editor Robert Higgs. This quarterly journal, guided by co-editors Christopher J. Coyne, and Michael C. Munger, and Robert M. Whaples offers leading-edge insights on today’s most critical issues in economics, healthcare, education, law, history, political science, philosophy, and sociology. Thought-provoking and educational, The Independent Review is blazing the way toward informed debate! Student? Educator? Journalist? Business or civic leader? Engaged citizen? This journal is for YOU! *Order today for more FREE book options Perfect for students or anyone on the go! The Independent Review is available on mobile devices or tablets: iOS devices, Amazon Kindle Fire, or Android through Magzter. INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE, 100 SWAN WAY, OAKLAND, CA 94621 • 800-927-8733 • [email protected] PROMO CODE IRA1703 New Deal Nemesis The “Old Right” Jeffersonians —————— ✦ —————— SHELDON RICHMAN “Th[e] central question is not clarified, it is obscured, by our common political categories of left, right, and center.” —CARL OGLESBY, Containment and Change odern ignorance about the Old Right was made stark by reactions to H. L. Mencken’s diary, published in 1989. The diary received M extraordinary attention, and reviewers puzzled over Mencken’s opposition to the beloved Franklin Roosevelt, to the New Deal, and to U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Migration Dividend Fund
    MIGRATION DIVIDEND FUND A GLOBAL FUTURE REPORT JULY 2019 Contents OUR DIRECTORS / ADVISORY BOARD 4 FOREWORD by Pat McFadden 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 PART ONE – Immigration and Towns: The Case for Action 18 PART TWO – A New Approach: The Migration Dividend Fund 51 PART THREE – Communicating The Scheme 75 This research was supported by Paul Hamlyn Foundation Global Future is a fresh voice in the debate about our country’s direction. We make the case for immigration, freedom of movement and building an open and vibrant Britain that looks out to the world and succeeds in it. We believe the dynamism of our economy and creativity of our culture depends on our country remaining open to people, trade and ideas from across the world. In the emerging political divide between open and closed visions for the future, we reject the narrow nationalism of those who want to close us off or who live in the myths of the past. Instead, we believe that the only way Britain can succeed in the future is as a vibrant and open nation that reaches out to the world. Global Future’s mission is not only to help people appreciate the benefits of openness but also to understand the genuine issues that stand in the way of realising these benefits for everyone. We will explore new ways for people to take more control over what matters most in their lives without cutting themselves off from opportunities to succeed in an interconnected world. Find out more: WWW.OURGLOBALFUTURE.COM TWITTER @Global_Future Our Directors Our Advisory Board GURNEK BAINS MIKE COUPE CEO and Founder
    [Show full text]
  • Fair Deal Panel | Report to Government
    Report to Government MAY 2020 FAIR DEAL PANEL | REPORT TO GOVERNMENT Contents Tribute to Chief Jason Goodstriker 4 Acknowledgment by the Fair Deal Panel of the current health and economic crises affecting Alberta 5 Executive summary 6 PART I: Who we heard from and what we heard 9 · I. The Panel’s Mandate 9 · II. Who we heard from 11 · III. What did we hear from Albertans 13 · IV. Basics of provincial and federal jurisdictions 13 PART II: The Panel’s recommendations 16 · Equalization 16 · Collaborative actions 19 · Unilateral actions 31 Part III: Telling Alberta’s story 50 A sincere thank you to Albertans 54 Appendices 55 Appendix A | Fair Deal Panel mandate letter 55 Appendix B | Terms of reference 57 Appendix C | Meet the panel 60 Appendix D | Fair Deal Panel engagement 62 Appendix E | Poll and survey results - quantitative 64 3 FAIR DEAL PANEL | REPORT TO GOVERNMENT Remembering Chief Goodstriker Photo credit: Trevor Page On January 16th, 2020, one of our Fair Deal Panel members, Chief Jason Goodstriker, passed away in Slave Lake, Alberta, at the age of 47 years. His Kainai, Blackfoot Confederacy and Dakota/Lakota People have lost a great son. Alberta’s First Nations have lost a great political leader and businessman. Fair Deal Panel members have lost a great role model. Chief Goodstriker’s natural ability to create a comfortable space for others to share their point of view was exceptional. He listened, but not just with his ears; all his senses were engaged. We extend our sincerest condolences to the family of Chief Goodstriker and especially to his wife, Tiffany Pompana, who joined us at many town halls across the province.
    [Show full text]
  • Tatw =TRS ^
    Prelim-CivRgts.fm Page iii Wednesday, August 29, 2007 4:11 PM ?S P .TaTW =TRS_^ C<>8:P of 3L]]d > ?]`XLY Edited By Raymond H. Geselbracht Volume 2 Truman State University Press HST CivilRights.book Page iv Wednesday, August 8, 2007 2:00 PM Copyright © 2007 Truman State University Press, Kirksville, Missouri 63501 All rights reserved tsup.truman.edu Cover Photo: President Truman meeting with African American leaders who want more African Americans in important positions in agencies involved in the administration’s defense program, 28 February 1951. The President’s prominent visitors include Mary McLeod Bethune, president emeritus of the National Council of Negro Women, Lester Granger, executive secretary of the National Urban League, Tobias Channing, director of the Phelps-Stokes Foundation, and Walter White, executive secretary of the NAACP. Cover design: Shaun Hoffeditz Type: Garamond Light, ITC Garamond is a registered trademark of Interna- tional Typeface Corporation; Bauer Text Initials, copyright Phil’s Fonts. Printed by: Edwards Brothers, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan USA Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The civil rights legacy of Harry S. Truman / edited by Raymond H. Geselbracht. p. cm. — (Truman legacy series; v. 2) “Based on the Second Truman Legacy Symposium, Harry Truman and civil rights, May 14–15, 2004, Key West, Florida.” Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978–1–931112–67–3 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Truman, Harry S., 1884–1972—Political and social views. 2. Civil rights— United States—History—20th century. 3. African Americans—Civil rights— History—20th century. 4. United States—Race relations—Political aspects—His- tory—20th century.
    [Show full text]