DOCSLIB.ORG

Fiscal Decentralization in the Russian Federation During the Transition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

International Studies Program Working Paper 99-3 July 1999 Fiscal Decentralization in the Russian Federation during the Transition Jorge Martinez-Vazquez L.F. Jameson Boex Fiscal Decentralization in the Russian Federation during the Transition Jorge Martinez-Vazquez and Jameson Boex * Department of Economics School of Policy Studies Georgia State University December 1998 (Revised July 1999) * We would like to thank Roy Bahl, Michael Bell, Richard Bird, Lev Freinkman, Albert Igudin, Galina Kourliandskaia, John Mikesell, Yelena Nikolayenko and Sally Wallace for their comments and many helpful suggestions. We are grateful to Lev Freinkman, Stepan Titov and Alexander Morozov for sharing various data sets with us. This research was funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development under Georgia State University’s Russian Fiscal Reform Project and the World Bank Institute. The opinions expressed in this study are strictly the authors’ own, and should not be attributed to either USAID or the World Bank. FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION DURING THE TRANSITION Jorge Martinez-Vazquez and Jameson Boex TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ........................................................ -iii- CHAPTER I THE DYNAMICS OF DECENTRALIZATION IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION -1- I.1 The Forces behind Decentralization in the Russian Federation ............. -2- I.2 A Historical Overview of Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations Since 1992 .... -6- I.3 The Role of Politics in the Decentralization Process ................... -10- I.4 Dimensions of Fiscal Decentralization in the Russian Federation .......... -13- CHAPTER II EXPENDITURE RESPONSIBILITIES ................................. -15- II.1 How Have Expenditures Been Assigned? ........................... -15- II.2 How Has the System Performed ? ................................. -22- II.3 Pending Policy Issues in Expenditure Assignments .................... -26- CHAPTER III REVENUE ASSIGNMENTS AND TAX ADMINISTRATION ISSUES ........ -35- III.1 How Have Revenues Been Assigned? .............................. -35- III.2 Trends in Revenue Collections ................................... -41- III.3 How Has the System Performed? ................................. -44- III.4 The Role of Perverse Incentives and Soft Budget Constraints ............ -49- III.5 The Role of Tax Administration .................................. -50- III.6 Pending Reform Agenda in Revenue Assignments ..................... -52- CHAPTER IV THE SYSTEM OF TRANSFERS ............................................ -58- IV.1 Evolution of the System of Transfers .............................. -58- IV.2 The Current System of Transfers ................................. -62- IV.3 How Has the Transfer System Performed? .......................... -66- IV.4 Pending Policy Agenda for the Reform of Transfers ................... -70- -i- CHAPTER V SUBNATIONAL BORROWING, DEBT AND FINANCIAL CONTROLS ...... -76- V.1 Evolution of the Legal Framework for Borrowing .................... -76- V.2 Analysis of Subnational Deficits and Debts .......................... -77- V.3 Pending Policy Agenda for the Reform of Subnational Borrowing ........ -82- CHAPTER VI IMPLEMENTING REFORM ......................................... -86- VI.1 Piece-meal versus Unified Reform Strategy .......................... -86- VI.2 Uniform versus Asymmetric Federalism and Addressing Fiscal Disparities .. -87- VI.3 Compliance with the Federal Laws by the Regions .................... -89- VI.4 Communications Between Federal and Regional Governments ........... -91- VI.5 Determining the Form of Fiscal Federalism .......................... -91- REFERENCES .......................................................... -94- -ii- LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Assignment of Expenditure Responsibilities in the Russian Federation in 1997 .... -98- Table 2: Distribution of Expenditures Between the Levels of the Government, 1992-1997 . -99- Table 3: Distribution of Expenditures Between the Levels of the Government, 1992-1997 -100- Table 4: Distribution of Expenditures by Function Between the Levels of Government, 1992-1997 ..................................... -101- Table 5: Average Regional Expenditures by Category, as Percent of Total Regional Expenditures, 1994-1997 ..................................... -102- Table 6: Evaluation of Composition of Expenditures for Subnational Governments in Real Terms, 1992-1997 ........................................... -103- Table 7: Regional Economic Disparities in the Russian Federation: Per Capita Gross Regional Product , Selected Years from 1992-1996 ........................ -104- Table 8: Measures of Horizontal Fiscal Imbalance in the Russian Federation: Per Capita Consolidated Regional Expenditures, 1992-1997 .......................... -105- Table 9: Level of Equalization at Different Stages of Revenue Assignment: Coefficient of Variation of Cumulative Per Capita Allocation, 1992-1997 ........ -106- Table 10: Regional Socio-Economic and Demographic Variables: Descriptive Statistics .. -107- Table 11: Determinants of Per Capita Expenditures, 1994-1997 ..................... -108- Table 12: Determinants of Per Capita Expenditures on National Economy, 1994-1997 ... -109- Table 13: Determinants of Per Capita Expenditures on Housing and Public Utilities, 1994-1997 ................................................ -110- Table 14: Determinants of Per Capita Expenditures on Education, 1994-1997 .......... -111- Table 15: Determinants of Per Capita Expenditures on Public Health and Physical Education, 1994-1997 ....................................... -112- -iii- Table 16: Expenditure Assignment in the Budget Code, 1998 ...................... -113- Table 17: Legislated Sharing Rates of Major Taxes in the Russian Federation .......... -114- Table 18: Status of Taxes in the Tax Code (1998) ............................... -115- Table 19: Own Revenues and Shared Revenues as a Percentage of Consolidated Subnational Collections (Excluding Transfers and Subventions) .... -116- Table 20: Distribution of Revenues Between the Levels of Government, 1992-1997 ..... -117- Table 21: Russia: Consolidated Subnational Own Source Revenue Collections, 1997 ..... -119- Table 22: Summary of Legislative Control over Subnational Own Source Revenues ..... -120- Table 23: Distribution of Revenues Between the Levels of the Government, 1992-1997 .. -121- Table 24: Evaluation of Composition of Revenues for Subnational Governments in Real Terms, 1992-1997 ........................................... -122- Table 25: Russia: Measures of Vertical Fiscal Imbalance for the Subnational Sector, 1997 . -123- Table 26: Measures of Vertical Fiscal Imbalance for the Subnational Sector: An International Comparison ......................................... -124- Table 27: Measures of Regional Fiscal Disparities in the Russian Federation: Per Capita Revenue Collections (including Federal Share), 1993-1997 .......... -125- Table 28: Concentration of Total Revenue Collections (Including Federal Share) Among Regions: Share of Total Revenues Collected by Selected Regions, 1993-1997 .... -126- Table 29: Concentration of Regional Revenue Collections Among Regions: Share of Regional Revenues Collected by Selected Regions, 1992-1997 ......... -127- Table 30: Analysis of Regional Natural Resource Tax (NRT) Collections, 1994-1997 .... -128- Table 31: Fund for Financial Support of the Regions (FFSR) ...................... -129- Table 32: Formula for Allocating FFSR Transfers, 1999 .......................... -131- -iv- Table 33: Funding Sources for the Regions of the Russian Federation: Average Regional Funding by Source as Percent of Total Expenditures, 1992-1997 -132- Table 34: Federal Transfers to the Regions, 1992-1997 ........................... -133- Table 35: Evaluation of Composition of Transfers for Subnational Governments in Real Terms, 1992-1997 ........................................... -134- Table 36: Regression Analysis: Per Capita FFSR Transfers, 1994-1997 ............... -135- Table 37: Regression Analysis: Per Capita Other Transfers (Excluding Budget Loans), 1994-1997 ................................................. -136- Table 38: Regression Analysis: Allocation of (Per Capita) Regional Resources, 1994 ..... -137- Table 39: Regression Analysis: Allocation of (Per Capita) Regional Resources, 1995 ..... -138- Table 40: Regression Analysis: Allocation of (Per Capita) Regional Resources, 1996 ..... -139- Table 41: Regression Analysis: Allocation of (Per Capita) Regional Resources, 1997 ..... -140- Table 42: Explaining Tax Effort for Regional Collections, 1994-1997 ................ -141- Table 43: Explaining Tax Effort for Overall Collections (Including Federal Share), 1994-1997 ................................................. -142- Table 44: Percent of the Executed Share of a Region in the FFSR ................... -143- Table 45: Russia: Consolidated Budget Execution as Percent of GDP, 1992-1997 ....... -145- Table 46: Relative Size of Subnational Debt: Comparison of Selected Countries ........ -146- Table 47: Regression Analysis: Per Capita “Other Sources of Financing”, 1994-1997 .... -147- -v- CHAPTER I THE DYNAMICS OF DECENTRALIZATION IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION Intergovernmental fiscal relations may be the most contentious issue in the Russian Federation today. This is the result of the complexity of the problems intertwined with intergovernmental relations. These problems include the recent history of disintegration of the Soviet Union; the war in Chechnya; the ethno-linguistic, religious
Recommended publications
  • Information About the Authors

    Information About the Authors

    Ярославский педагогический вестник – 2015 – № 6 INFORMATION ABOUT THE AUTHORS Abaturova Vera Sergeevna – Candidate of Peda- Belkina Tamara Leonidovna – Candidate of gogical Sciences, Head of the Educational and In- Philosophic Sciences, Associate Professor, Professor formation Technologies Department of the Southern of the Philosophy and Political Science Department Mathematical Institute of Vladikavkaz Scientific of FSBEI HPE «Kostroma State University named Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, the Re- after N. A. Nekrasov». 156961, Kostroma, 1-st May public of Noth Ossetia – Alania. 362027, Vladikav- Street, 14. kaz, Markus Street, 22. E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Belova Irina Sergeevna – Candidate of Philo- Azov Andrey Vadimovich – Doctor of Philosoph- sophic Sciences, Professor of the General Humani- ic Sciences, Professor, Head of the Philosophy De- ties and Study of Theatre Department of FSBEI HPE partment of FSBEI HPE «Yaroslavl State Pedagogi- «Yaroslavl State Theatrical Institute». 150000, Ya- cal University named after K. D. Ushinsky». roslavl, Pervomayskaya Street, 43. 150000, Yaroslavl, Respublikanskaya Street, 108. E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Budakhina Nadezhda Leonidovna – Candidate Bazikov Mikhail Vasilievich – an applicant of of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor of the the General and Social Psychology Department of Economics and Management Department of FSBEI FSBEI HPE «Yaroslavl State Pedagogical Universi- HPE «Yaroslavl State Pedagogical University
  • New Records of Lichens and Allied Fungi from the Kostroma Region, Russia

    New Records of Lichens and Allied Fungi from the Kostroma Region, Russia

    Folia Cryptog. Estonica, Fasc. 56: 53–62 (2019) https://doi.org/10.12697/fce.2019.56.06 New records of lichens and allied fungi from the Kostroma Region, Russia Irina Urbanavichene1 & Gennadii Urbanavichus2 1Komarov Botanical Institute RAS, Professor Popov Str. 2, 197376 St Petersburg, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] 2Institute of North Industrial Ecology Problems, Kola Science Centre RAS, Akademgorodok 14a, 184209 Apatity, Murmansk Region, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: 29 species of lichens, 3 non-lichenized calicioid fungi and 3 lichenicolous fungi are reported for the first time from the Kostroma Region. Among them, 15 species are new for the Central Federal District, including Myrionora albidula – a rare species with widely scattered locations, previously known only from the Southern Urals Mts in European Russia. The most important discoveries are confined to old-growth coniferous Picea sp. and Abies sibirica forests in the Kologriv Forest Nature Reserve. Two species (Leptogium burnetiae and Menegazzia terebrata) are included in the Red Data Book of Russian Federation. The distribution, ecology, taxonomic characters and conservation status of rare species and of those new for the Central Federal District are provided. Keywords: Biatora mendax, Myrionora albidula, old-growth forests, southern taiga, Kologriv Forest Reserve, Central European Russia INTRODUCTION The Kostroma Region is a large (60,211 km2), berniya, listing 39 and 54 taxa, respectively. most northeastern part of the Central Federal The recent published additions to the Kostroma District in European Russia situated between lichen flora are from the Kologriv District by Ivanovo, Yaroslavl, Vologda, Kirov and Nizhniy Novgorod regions (Fig.
  • Vexillum, June 2018, No. 2

    Vexillum, June 2018, No. 2

    Research and news of the North American Vexillological Association June 2018 No. Recherche et nouvelles de l’Association nord-américaine de vexillologie Juin 2018 2 INSIDE Page Editor’s Note 2 President’s Column 3 NAVA Membership Anniversaries 3 The Flag of Unity in Diversity 4 Incorporating NAVA News and Flag Research Quarterly Book Review: "A Flag Worth Dying For: The Power and Politics of National Symbols" 7 New Flags: 4 Reno, Nevada 8 The International Vegan Flag 9 Regional Group Report: The Flag of Unity Chesapeake Bay Flag Association 10 Vexi-News Celebrates First Anniversary 10 in Diversity Judge Carlos Moore, Mississippi Flag Activist 11 Stamp Celebrates 200th Anniversary of the Flag Act of 1818 12 Captain William Driver Award Guidelines 12 The Water The Water Protectors: Native American Nationalism, Environmentalism, and the Flags of the Dakota Access Pipeline Protectors Protests of 2016–2017 13 NAVA Grants 21 Evolutionary Vexillography in the Twenty-First Century 21 13 Help Support NAVA's Upcoming Vatican Flags Book 23 NAVA Annual Meeting Notice 24 Top: The Flag of Unity in Diversity Right: Demonstrators at the NoDAPL protests in January 2017. Source: https:// www.indianz.com/News/2017/01/27/delay-in- nodapl-response-points-to-more.asp 2 | June 2018 • Vexillum No. 2 June / Juin 2018 Number 2 / Numéro 2 Editor's Note | Note de la rédaction Dear Reader: We hope you enjoyed the premiere issue of Vexillum. In addition to offering my thanks Research and news of the North American to the contributors and our fine layout designer Jonathan Lehmann, I owe a special note Vexillological Association / Recherche et nouvelles de l’Association nord-américaine of gratitude to NAVA members Peter Ansoff, Stan Contrades, Xing Fei, Ted Kaye, Pete de vexillologie.
  • COMMISSION DECISION of 21 December 2005 Amending for The

    COMMISSION DECISION of 21 December 2005 Amending for The

    L 340/70EN Official Journal of the European Union 23.12.2005 COMMISSION DECISION of 21 December 2005 amending for the second time Decision 2005/693/EC concerning certain protection measures in relation to avian influenza in Russia (notified under document number C(2005) 5563) (Text with EEA relevance) (2005/933/EC) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, cessed parts of feathers from those regions of Russia listed in Annex I to that Decision. Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, (3) Outbreaks of avian influenza continue to occur in certain parts of Russia and it is therefore necessary to prolong the measures provided for in Decision 2005/693/EC. The Decision can however be reviewed before this date depending on information supplied by the competent Having regard to Council Directive 91/496/EEC of 15 July 1991 veterinary authorities of Russia. laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on animals entering the Community from third countries and amending Directives 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC and 90/675/EEC (1), and in particular Article 18(7) thereof, (4) The outbreaks in the European part of Russia have all occurred in the central area and no outbreaks have occurred in the northern regions. It is therefore no longer necessary to continue the suspension of imports of unprocessed feathers and parts of feathers from the Having regard to Council Directive 97/78/EC of 18 December latter. 1997 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on products entering the Community from third countries (2), and in particular Article 22 (6) thereof, (5) Decision 2005/693/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
  • Second Report Submitted by the Russian Federation Pursuant to The

    Second Report Submitted by the Russian Federation Pursuant to The

    ACFC/SR/II(2005)003 SECOND REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 25, PARAGRAPH 2 OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES (Received on 26 April 2005) MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION REPORT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PROVISIONS OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Report of the Russian Federation on the progress of the second cycle of monitoring in accordance with Article 25 of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities MOSCOW, 2005 2 Table of contents PREAMBLE ..............................................................................................................................4 1. Introduction........................................................................................................................4 2. The legislation of the Russian Federation for the protection of national minorities rights5 3. Major lines of implementation of the law of the Russian Federation and the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities .............................................................15 3.1. National territorial subdivisions...................................................................................15 3.2 Public associations – national cultural autonomies and national public organizations17 3.3 National minorities in the system of federal government............................................18 3.4 Development of Ethnic Communities’ National
  • Demographic, Economic, Geospatial Data for Municipalities of the Central Federal District in Russia (Excluding the City of Moscow and the Moscow Oblast) in 2010-2016

    Demographic, Economic, Geospatial Data for Municipalities of the Central Federal District in Russia (Excluding the City of Moscow and the Moscow Oblast) in 2010-2016

    Population and Economics 3(4): 121–134 DOI 10.3897/popecon.3.e39152 DATA PAPER Demographic, economic, geospatial data for municipalities of the Central Federal District in Russia (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) in 2010-2016 Irina E. Kalabikhina1, Denis N. Mokrensky2, Aleksandr N. Panin3 1 Faculty of Economics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia 2 Independent researcher 3 Faculty of Geography, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia Received 10 December 2019 ♦ Accepted 28 December 2019 ♦ Published 30 December 2019 Citation: Kalabikhina IE, Mokrensky DN, Panin AN (2019) Demographic, economic, geospatial data for munic- ipalities of the Central Federal District in Russia (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) in 2010- 2016. Population and Economics 3(4): 121–134. https://doi.org/10.3897/popecon.3.e39152 Keywords Data base, demographic, economic, geospatial data JEL Codes: J1, J3, R23, Y10, Y91 I. Brief description The database contains demographic, economic, geospatial data for 452 municipalities of the 16 administrative units of the Central Federal District (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) for 2010–2016 (Appendix, Table 1; Fig. 1). The sources of data are the municipal-level statistics of Rosstat, Google Maps data and calculated indicators. II. Data resources Data package title: Demographic, economic, geospatial data for municipalities of the Cen- tral Federal District in Russia (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) in 2010–2016. Copyright I.E. Kalabikhina, D.N.Mokrensky, A.N.Panin The article is publicly available and in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC-BY 4.0) can be used without limits, distributed and reproduced on any medium, pro- vided that the authors and the source are indicated.
  • Otkhodnichestvo's Impact on Small Towns in Russia

    Otkhodnichestvo's Impact on Small Towns in Russia

    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Zausaeva, Yana Conference Paper Otkhodnichestvo's impact on small towns in Russia 54th Congress of the European Regional Science Association: "Regional development & globalisation: Best practices", 26-29 August 2014, St. Petersburg, Russia Provided in Cooperation with: European Regional Science Association (ERSA) Suggested Citation: Zausaeva, Yana (2014) : Otkhodnichestvo's impact on small towns in Russia, 54th Congress of the European Regional Science Association: "Regional development & globalisation: Best practices", 26-29 August 2014, St. Petersburg, Russia, European Regional Science Association (ERSA), Louvain-la-Neuve This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/124426 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen)
  • History of Radiation and Nuclear Disasters in the Former USSR

    History of Radiation and Nuclear Disasters in the Former USSR

    History of radiation and nuclear disasters in the former USSR M.V.Malko Institute of Power Engineering National Academy of Sciences of Belarus Akademicheskaya Str.15, Minsk, 220 000, Republic of Belarus E-mail: [email protected] Abstracts. The report describes the history of radiation and nuclear accidents in the former USSR. These accidents accompanied development of military and civilian use of nuclear energy. Some of them as testing of the first Soviet nuclear, Kyshtym radiation accident, radiation contamination of the Karachai lake and the Techa river, nuclear accidents at the Soviet submarine on August 10, 1985 in the Chazhma Bay (near Vladivostok) as well as nuclear accidents on April 26, 1986 at the Chernobyl NPP were of large scale causing significant radiological problems for many hundreds thousands of people. There were a number of important reasons of these and other accidents. The most important among them were time pressure by development of nuclear weapon, an absence of required financial and material means for adequate management of problems of nuclear and radiation safety, and inadequate understanding of harmful interaction of ionizing radiation on organism as well as a hypersecrecy by realization of projects of military and civilian use of nuclear energy in the former USSR. Introduction. The first nuclear reactor in the USSR reached the critical state on the 25 December 1946 [1] or 4 years later than reactor constructed by Enrico Fermi [2]. The first Soviet reactor was developed at the Laboratory N2 in Moscow (later I.V.Kurchatov Institute of Atomic Energy). This was a very important step in a realization of the Soviet military atomic program that began in September 1942.
  • The Great Patriotic War: Figures, Faces and Monuments of Our Victory

    The Great Patriotic War: Figures, Faces and Monuments of Our Victory

    0 КОСТРОМСКОЙ ОБЛАСТНОЙ ИНСТИТУТ РАЗВИТИЯ ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ Kostroma Land during the Great Patriotic War: figures, faces and monuments of our Victory КОСТРОМА, 2020 1 ББК 81.2Англ-922 УДК 811.111 K 72 Авторский коллектив: И. М. Сидорова, учитель английского языка, Т. В. Смирнова, учитель английского языка, МБОУ Караваевская средняя общеобразовательная школа Костромского муниципального района; Н. В. Пашкевич, методист отдела реализации программ дополнительного образования школьников ОГБОУ ДПО «КОИРО» Рецензенты: Лушина Елена Альбертовна, ректор ОГБОУ ДПО «КОИРО»; Заботкина Ольга Алексеевна, преподаватель Даремского университета (Великобритания), член Союза Журналистов РФ, член Академии высшего образования Великобритании; France Christopher Norman Lee, teacher, Durham; Kjell Eilert Karlsen, Owner and Managing Director of Institute working with Organizational and strategic Management development for Finance and Bank Institutions. Clinical psychologist, Cand. Psychol. University of Bergen, Norway; Connor S. Farris, Teacher of English as a Second Language, the USA; Elena Butler, Alive Mental Health Fair, the USA K 72 Kostroma Land during the Great Patriotic War: figures, faces and monuments of our Victory: Учебное пособие по английскому языку для учащихся 8–11 классов / Авт. И. М. Сидорова, Т. В. Смирнова, Н. В. Пашкевич; ред. Е. А. Лушина, О. А. Заботкина, France Christopher Norman Lee, Kjell Eilert Karlsen, Connor S. Farris, Elena Butler. — Кострома: КОИРО, 2020. — 44 с.: ил. ББК 81.2Англ-922 УДК 811.111 Это пособие посвящено великой дате – 75-летию Победы в Великой Отечественной войне. …Многие страны сейчас пытаются переписать историю, забывая, что именно Советский Союз освободил мир от фашистской чумы, что именно наша страна выстояла и победила в далёком 1945 году. Костромская земля внесла немалый вклад в дело Победы.
  • Download Article

    Download Article

    Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 171 International Conference on Art Studies: Science, Experience, Education (ICASSEE 2017) M. I. Glinka’s Opera A Life for the Tzar: a Historical- Archaeological Perspective of Research Yevgeniy Levashev State Institute for Art Studies Moscow, Russia E-mail: [email protected] Nadezhda Teterina State Institute for Art Studies Moscow, Russia E-mail: [email protected] Yelena Shcheboleva State Institute for Art Studies Moscow, Russia E-mail: [email protected] Abstract—The scientific matter, which is associated with (the day of Mikhail Feodorovich Romanov’s coronation at the name of a real historical person, but somewhat the Moscow Kremlin)1 . mythologized folk hero, the peasant Ivan Susanin, has been discussed in many dozens of books and hundreds of articles in When approached superficially, the development of various fields of domestic Humanities. Among them, a action in Glinka’s opera may seem overloaded with blatant significant part of this research is musicology, which is the key contradictions. They were especially visible in the value in the history of Russian music opera masterpiece by sumptuous theatrical productions of the nineteenth century. Mikhail Ivanovich Glinka. The objective of this article consists consequently in an attempt to show how naturally the musical Indeed, the scene of Polish ball, at which a typical figure drama is associated with the creatively comprehended system of Catholic cardinal is present, gives rise to the following of historical facts in the opera “A Life for the Tsar”. perplexing question: how the Polish soldiers, despite the cruel Russian frost, could reach the distant village of Keywords—Opera “A Life for the Tsar”, Ivan Susanin, tsar Domnino without having noticed on their way neither Mikhail Romanov, Russia and Polish-Lithuanian Smolensk, nor Moscow, nor else Yaroslavl’ or Kostroma.
  • DESIGN CONSTRUCTION |About Company

    DESIGN CONSTRUCTION |About Company

    DESIGN CONSTRUCTION |About Company Successful work amid the First significant contract for global financial crisis; 2001 the General Design and the start of effective reconstruction of the object 2008 - 2010 cooperation with foreign with the total area over customers 15,000 m2; Establishment of the development of order 1992 Research and Production portfolio Company Metallimpress Simultaneous construction which core operation was Foundation of its own 2006 1998 of several large objects design facilities for steel structure production acting as the General Contractor Launch of construction and installation direction 1996 Entry from the regional market to the all-Russian market; taking the repeated orders from the customers; increase in production Active phase of the company 2007 capacity structuring, formation of the Design Active promotion of Team departments: Steel Structures, 2004 «turn-key» construction Detailed Design, Foundation Engineering, Reinforced Concrete Structures, Architectual Solutions, General Plan; Potential growth: the Company is able to carry up the establishment of construction and 2014 to 12 projects simultaneously finishing branch in the construction and production department 1999 2 3 |Company’s Profile |Services The basic model of collaboration with customers is turn-key construction which includes: Industrial facilities: • Automobile plants; GENERAL CONTRACT • Food production; GENERAL DESIGN • Heavy industry plants; TECHNICAL CLIENT • Light industry plants; • Chemical production; Metallimpress is a General Contractor with comprehensive approach to project implementation. • Pharmaceutical production; While performing functions of the General Contractor the Сompany puts emphasis on: • Plants of light and heavy engineering. • Qualified construction management; • Quality of technologies, materials and equipment used under construction; • Compliance with the requirements of environmental protection, occupational health and safety.
  • Russian Government Continues to Support Cattle Sector

    Russian Government Continues to Support Cattle Sector

    THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S. GOVERNMENT POLICY Voluntary - Public Date: 6/17/2013 GAIN Report Number: RS1335 Russian Federation Post: Moscow Russian Government Continues to Support Cattle Sector Report Categories: Livestock and Products Policy and Program Announcements Agricultural Situation Approved By: Holly Higgins Prepared By: FAS/Moscow Staff Report Highlights: Russia’s live animal imports have soared in recent years, as the Federal Government has supported the rebuilding of the beef and cattle sector in Russia. This sector had been in continual decline since the break-up of the Soviet Union, but imports of breeding stock have resulted in a number of modern ranches. The Russian Federal and oblast governments offer a series of support programs meant to stimulate livestock development in the Russian Federation over the next seven years which are funded at hundreds of billions of Russian rubles (almost $10 billion). These programs are expected to lead to a recovery of the cattle industry. Monies have been allocated for both new construction and modernization of old livestock farms, purchase of domestic and imported of high quality breeding dairy and beef cattle, semen and embryos; all of which should have a direct and favorable impact on livestock genetic exports to Russia through 2020. General Information: Trade Russia’s live animal imports have soared in recent years, as the Federal Government has supported the rebuilding of the beef and cattle sector in Russia. This sector has been in decline since the break-up of the Soviet Union, but imports of breeding stock have resulted in a number of modern ranches which are expected to lead to a recovery of the cattle industry.