<<

THE MUSEUM OF MODERN tl WEST 53 STREET, NEW YORK 19, N. Y. TELEPHONE. CIRCLE 5-S900

490624 - FOR WEDNESDAY RELEASE

MUSEUM TO SHOW MOST COMPREHENSIVE EXHIBITION OP ITALIAN TWENTIETH-CENTURY ART

^The international importance and scope of Italian 20th-century art

Assembling the show; To assemble the exhibition the Museum last year sent two staff members to Italy for several months. James Thrall Soby, Chairman of the Department of and , and Alfred H. Barr, Jr., plrector of Museum Collections, were aided in their search for new by two large exhibitions, the Quadrlennale in and the giennale In , both revived for the first time since the war. prom these shows they learned of a number of artists previously un­ known to them, despite prior compilation of lists from art books and catalogs that had come out of postwar Italy. Private collections and galleries in the major cities were also rewarding sources, but the museums for the most part were seriously lacking in the best 20th-century Italian pictures. In the work of assembling the art and in the complicated details of arranging long-term loans, packing and shipping, Mr. Soby and Mr. Barr were enormously aided by the good offices and remarkable generosity of Romeo Tonlnelli, a silk design­ er and manufacturer of , who is much interested in modern . Many collectors in Italy proved to be people of moderate means - some of them professional men and tradesmen->.who had first acquired works in exchange for services or goods and then continued as enthu­ siastic collectors. They displayed in their choice a highly Individ­ ual and personal , often collecting as many as 35 to 40 works by a favorite artist* The younger Italian artists charge low prices for their works - perhaps one-fifth as much as in America - and thus sell regularly a good part of what they produce and at the same time make art accessible to interested people even of modest resources. ^'orks were selected on the basis of their intrinsic quality and of their potential interest for the American public. Where quality would not be sacrificed, smaller works were chosen rather than larger because of the high costs of transportation; but there are nevertheless a few very large canvases in the show.

Italy|s postwar art world: The difficulties from which the artists emerged after the end of Fascism and German domination have been summarized by one of the outstanding younger artists: "We were all victims...of insecurities and anxiety, of a certain fhermeticism1 - that was the only possible way of protesting. Till 1946 I had. seen nothing of modern painting - no Impressionist, no Cezanne, no Picasso - nothing except in reproduction. This is true of all my generation. They sent us off to war: lnsteadvi,.. problems resolved elsewhere remained unsolved - 3 - >iere» and besides one had to be prudent and not reveal oneself too much." The effect of last year's Venice 3iennale exhibition, where most of the younger Italian artists saw for the first time famous works by modern masters of other nations, cannot yet be truly gaug­ ed. Here Manet, Renoir, Cezanne, Klee, Picasso, Braque, and groups of French, American, Belgian and Austrian works suddenly were presented to a previously isolated art world, most of whose artists had been unable to travel abroad because of the war or, before that, the strict passport and currency regulations of the Fascist regime. Nor did the autarchic policies of Fascism encourage the importation of foreign art during all those years* Nevertheless it should be said that some Italian artists, chiefly of the older generation, were aware of advanced developments in art abroad and of their own accord repudiated these developments. Others of that generation sought refuge from Fascism1s officially approved styles in work of a highly individual character. It is the young who will probably be most affected by the new influx of foreign art in Italy.

HISTORICAL AND CHRONOLOGICAL NOTES Futurism: In the rather easy-going, retrospective, peninsular Italy of 1909, Futurism exploded with a bang. Marinetti, a wealthy poet and dramatist, proclaimed its founding with his "Manifesto of Futurism" in which he stated: "We shall sing the love of danger, energy and boldness.... A roaring motor-car, which runs like a machine gun, is more beautiful than the Winged Victory of Samothrace.,,• We wish to glorify War.... We wish to destroy museums, the libraries...we would deliver Italy from its plague of professors, archeologists, tourist guides and antique dealers." Taking their cue from ITari- netti, the five young Futurist painters signed their own proclam­ ation in 1910: BOCCIONI, CARR\, RUSSOLO, BALLA and SEVERINI. Dis­ satisfied with portraying one "snapshot" of motion, they attempted to reveal all the rhythm and movement of a woman walking or a horse rearing. On one canvas they sought to portray something close to a movie sequence while their contemporaries were content to show only one still. They tried to express speed, dynamic energy and, in some paintings the whole complex of external sensations and internal - h-

ernotions. Their work was influenced by the French Neo-impressionlsts such as Seurat, and by the cubists whom they tried to surpass. The P'uturists were disturbed by their conviction that "For other countries Italy seems the land of the dead," but stated that "actually Italy is coming alive, and her political rebirth is now followed by her intellectual rebirth." They proposed "to exalt every form of originality even if reckless, even if over-violent.,.. Painters have always shown us figures and objects arranged in front of us. We are rroing to put the spectator at the center of the picture.... We are fighting.•.against the nude in painting which has become as boring and nauseating as adultery in literature." The famous Futurist exhibition held in Paris in 1912 traveled to major cities all over . It was received with conflicting rage and enthusiasm, but always with excitement. A few critics took it seriously, others were condescending or hostile; Modigllani was outraged; Picasso, contemptuous. In the middle of the tour, the Futurists were invited to take part in the New York of 1913g but they refused because they wanted separate galleries with a separate box office. In 1915 the Futurists worked furiously to bring Italy into the war on the Allied side and were several times arrested and jailed - once with Mussolini - as agitators for intervention. When Italy finally entered the war Russolo and Boccioni immediately enlisted In the artillery, Marinetti was wounded and twice decorated. Boccioni . was hit and invalided to a base hospital. Yet with all his enthusi­ astic espousal of war, it is ironical that he died from a fall from a horse while he was out riding. Severini, who took no active part in the war, made the best Futurist paintings of the war. When Mari­ netti emerged from the war, he allied himself with his fellow inter­ ventionist Mussolini and gathered around him a band of younger Futurists whose work however seems minor and marginal by comparison with the original group. The Museum1s exhibition is the most important showing of Futur­ ist painting and sculpture since the early days of the movement. It Is held, appropriately, on the IjOth anniversary of the first Futur­ ist Manifesto. - 5 - "Metaphysical" school: While Futurism published a program which its artists followed, the "Metaphysical" school was much less doctrinaire; it was "more a way of seeing than a formal school." Its aim was to portray strange­ ly philosophic and enigmatic images through the projection of common­ place and fantastic objects against unreal, dream-like settings. In 1917i CARLO CARRA, then )b and a veteran of the Futurist campaign, met the 28-year-old inventor of the "Metaphysical" school, , while both were stationed in a military hospital at . De Chirico, born in Gree.ce of Italian parents, had evolved his highly personal, atmospheric between 1911 and 1915* dream­ ing of the deserted piazzas of Italy while in self-enforced exile In Paris. At Ferrara, seconded by Carra, he developed his haunting art into the "Metaphysical" school, which gained international fame through the magazine . De Chirico has since renounc­ ed completely his own earlier works and modern art in general, and has just recently been invited to become one of only three foreign members of the British Royal Academy and to exhibit under its auspices. The third member of the school was of Bologna who evolved his own version of "Metaphysical" painting in isolation and was more interested in formal relationships than in the philosophical and psychological values stressed by de Chirico and Garra.

The "Metaphysical" movement was short-lived, and by late 1921 Carra. had painted his last picture in this vein, while de Chirico had long since returned to his classical heritage as an Italian, though he revived his Ferrarese iconography at intervals. But the school continued to exert an important influence on artists outside Italy. In , Switzerland and de Chirico1s "Metaphysical" fantasies became a crucial factor In the evolution of the Dadaists* and the Surrealists1 art.

Modlttllanl, Campinil: Meanwhile, in self-imposed exile in Paris, modern Italy1s best known artist (with the possible exception of de Chirico), AMEDEO MODIOLI All I had lived out his tragically short career which ended with his death from Spanish influenza in 1920. Under the influence of such Italian old masters as Botticelli, under the modern impact of Cezanne, and African sculpture, Modigliani; created a notable monument to the human figure and face. His art is marked by great sensibility and , his life by a desperate Bohemianism. A fine draftsman, he worked as a sculptor as well as a painter; indeed, he and Boccioni, who was also a painter, are very probably the best sculptors of the earlier 20th century in Italy. Of Italian artists in the generation following that of Modigli- ani, a few preferred to escape an oppressive atmosphere by moving, like Modigliani, to Paris. MASSIMO CAMPIGLI spent many years in Paris and there developed his highly personal style based on Etrus­ can and Pompeian sources,

Novecento ("Twentieth century"): In the post-World War I period of the early 1920s, art every­ where in the passed into a period of reaction toward and . By 1926 a group of painters of conservative or "reformed" tendency founded the movement known as the Novecento more or less with the official approval of the Fascist regime. Orig­ inally a small group of artists, united by a desire to return to and to repudiate such advanced developments as cubism and Futurism, the Novecento finally became merely a conveniently loose phrase to describe those Italian artists who had rejected internation­ al progressive art in favor of a return to native inspiration and sources. The Novecento had many sides. It included the rather pom­ pous neo-classicism which Mussolini liked. But it also included, at least in terms of public definition, the later work of de Chirico and Carra. DE CHIRICO, after the collapse of the "Metaphysical" school, veered towards romantic and subject pictures, influ­ enced by Bocklin, Delacroix, Courbet, Picasso and the old masters. CARRA painted elegiac Italian scenes, attempting to fuse Giottesque monumentality with Lombard . MORANDI, isolated in Bologna, continued to explore his major interest - the interplay of form and color, CASORATI, at Turin, achieved the careful, serene figure painting by which he is represented in the exhibition. DE PISIS, living mostly in France, adopted a rapid, impressionist style which recalls the 18th-century Venetian tradition of Guard!, - 7 - The Roman School: In Italy itself around 1928 - the date when Campigli's mature career began - there developed In Rome the first effective resistance among younger artists to Novecento formality. This was the so-called "Roman School," whose leader was SCIPIONE (Gino Bonichi), doomed like Eodigliani to early death. Scipione and his chief ally, WAR 10 MAFAI, were determined to paint only what they themselves felt deeply and instinctively. Scipione1s art, marked by a strong sense of fantasy and considerable expressionist vigor, often dealt with favorite Roman squares, with still life and anti-classic portraiture. Wafai painted scenes of demolition in Rome or withered flowers in full sunlight without regard for the compositional rigidity insisted on by the Novecento's neo-classicists. The influence of the "Roman School" is very much alive today.

Postwar developments: 1 •limn Mi il 11 •»• • 11 11 i' 1 With the end of the recent war, the isolation of the Italian artists was suddenly and dramatically ended. Since 19li5 the younger Italian artists have been workin^ with great eagerness to catch up and move ahead. One group, which became known as the Fronte nuovo delle artl, issued a manifesto in 19^ to further the general re­ action against the Novecento. Most current Italian painters of the Fronte believe in the art that has evolved from cubism and its later abstract ramifications and also to a lesser degree in . Their primary aim as stated in their manifesto is "to give their observations and their separate creations in the world of the imagin­ ation a basis of moral necessity and to bring them together as ex­ pressions of life." They are intent on bringing their art to grips with the humanitarian reality in which they are vitally interested. Wuch of their painting, as best illustrated by the wide selection of the forceful and colorful paintings of BKNATO GUTTUSO and ARWANDO PIZZINATO, have a great urgency about them and are motivated by aggressive hopes. , 37 years old, is probably the best known painter of his age in Europe. He is a leader among the young Roman artists who see a great deal of each other in cafes and restaurants and en­ courage one another in their art, tn the face of poverty and lack of success. His fame was increased enormously by the publication in . 8 - \()\\5 of his Gptt mlt una, a book of searing anti-German in** spired by his valorous experience in the Resistance, Politically active, he has refused all political pressure to change his style of painting toward academic representation. Although his art is broad­ ly abstract he retains a clear reference to contemporary actuality, GIORGIO HORAMDI is considered by many Italian critics to be the most important living Italian painter. Working quietly in Bol­ ogna, Morandi for nearly k.0 of his 60 years has collected quantities of bottles of all kinds - wine bottles, perfume bottles, decanters, gasoline and oil containers. Arranging them as models he has paint­ ed elegant still lifes in a kind of quietist rejection of Fascist neo-classic pomposity. His art is narrow in iconographic range but rich in lyric sensitivity. At the last summer he was well represented with the other painters who were once members of the "Metaphysical" school, and was awarded the much coveted prize for Italian painting - not so much for his "Metaphysical" works as for a lifetime of steady devotion to plastic research and for unflagging integrity and inspiration in its pursuit* , a sculptor who lives in Milan, is widely re­ garded in Italy and to an increasing degree abroad, as the most powerful younger sculptor in that country. As a committee member of the Biennale Marini worked for the inclusion of progressive painting and sculpture, and many artists and critics were disappoint­ ed when the first prize for Italian sculpture went to his younger and more conservative rival, Manzu. Eis impressive sculptures of Horsemen, two of which are in the exhibition, were originally inspired by the sight of the peasants of Northern Italy fleeing the bombings on horses swollen by hunger. Marini is also one of the most distinguished portrait sculptors of contemporary Europe. He and his wife live in a modern apartment in Milan since, as Marini explains, he needs to feel around him the energy of modern indus­ trial life, whereas in Rome the weight of the great artistic past is oppressive to him. v GIACOMO MANZU has been heard of before through American news­ papers when his series of bas-reliefs representing scenes of the Calvary and the Passion were objected to by the Pope because the characters are naked. Manzu, now Ijl, is deeply religious and in­ tensely serious. He was so grieved by the Pope's disapproval that - 9 - he traveled to Rome from his home in Milan to speak with the Holy Father and to explain that the bas-reliefs had in no way been created in an irreligious spirit. In one of them, done in 19^2, the mocking soldier is a helmeted German infantryman at a Crucifixion - courageous motif to have used during the German occupation. In addition to bas-reliefs, Hanzu is represented by small bronze fig­ ures and numerous sensitive drawings.

Information about the numerous artists included in the exhibition but, for lack of space, not mentioned here, as well as additional details about those artists described are available in the catalog of the exhibition. This book was prepared by James Thrall Soby and Alfred H. Barr, Jr., who assembled the works in Italy. It contains ll|!| pages; lljO reproductions, 5 in full color; full text on the devel­ opments in 20th-century Italian art; a complete check list of all works in the exhibition with a brief biography of each artist, and a comprehensive subject bibliography. Artists whose work is exhibited: AFRO (Basaldella) LUC10 PONTANA ARMANDO PIZZINATO GIACOMO 3ALLA EMILIO GRECO 0TT0NE ROSAI LUIGI 3ART0LINI VIRGILIO GUIDI LUIGI RUSS0LO UMBERTO BOGCIONI RENATO GUTTUSO GIUSEPPE SANT0MAS0 POMPEO BORRA STANISLAO LEPRI TOTI SCIALOJA CORRADO CAGLI MARIO HAFAI SCIPIONE (Gino Bonichi) MASJIMO CAMPIGLI GIACOMO HANZU PIO SEMEGHINI CARLO CARRA MARINO TIARINI FELICE CASORATI ARTURO TARTINI BRUNO CASSINARI MARCELLO MASCHERINI ARDENGO SOFFICI GIORGIO Dt CHIRICO GIOVANNI STRADONE FABRIZIO CLERICI GIORGIO MORANDI ARTURO TOSI ANTONIO DONGHI MARCELLO MUCCINI RENZO VESPIGNANI PLRICLE FAZ7.INI ALBERTO VIANI SALVATORE FIUME FILIPPO DE PISIS GIUSEPPE VIVIANI