DOCSLIB.ORG

Men of Mark in Connecticut, 1906

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Men of Mark in Connecticut, 1906 MenofmarkinConnecticut Osborn Galpin Norris Menf o Mark in Connecticut FIDEALS O AMERICAN LIFE TOLD IN BIOG RAPHIES AND AUTOBIOGRAPHIES OF EMINENT LIVING AMERICANS EDITEDY B COLONEL N . G. QSBORN EDITOR " NIW HAVEM REGISTER" INTRODUCTORY C HAPTER "What C onnecticut Stands For in the History of the Nation" BY S AMUEL HART, D.D. PRESIDENT C ONNECTICUT HISTORICAL SOCIETY WILLIAM R G OODSPEED HARTFORD, C ONNECTICUT 1906 > L IT:.:: t.u. » » .t Copyright 1 004 by B. F. JOBMSOM EDITOR'S P REFACE The d ifficulties to be encountered in compiling and editing a work of this character are many and varied, and it remains for public opinion to say with what success they have been met and over come. The aim has been to make a representative presentation of the men in the State of Connecticut who have contributed in- marked ways to its professional, industrial, and commercial integrity. It would be an affectation to claim that the work has been thoroughly done. It has in some cases been impossible to secure the cooperation and support of men of mark who belong in a book of this character. At the same time a larger and more sincere effort has been made to achieve the end in view, without exercising a snobbish discrimination, than has ever before been attempted. In asking the indulgence of the public, we do so in the knowledge that our purpose has been to group together, so far as possible, the men and their records, modestly worded, to whose usefulness the historian must in time turn for the human documents necessary to his purpose. I m ust in a word express my appreciation of the work under taken and accomplished by those who have been associated with me, and in particular the many, whose biographies will be found be tween the covers of the "Men of Mark," who, averse to publica tions of this character on account of past experiences, have been willing to take at its face value my characterization of its seriousness ft) and assist me in making it possible. Finally I ask the indulgence ^ of the public for what will unquestionably be detected as short- comings on the part of the Editor and his associates, still short- - comings though anticipated so far as possible. 2" S eptember 20, 1906. K. G. OSBORN, Editor. MENF O MARK IN CONNECTICUT .COL. N O. OSBORN, Editor-in-Chief ADVISORY B OARD HON. W ILLIAM 8. CASE HARTFORD JUDGE S UPERIOR COURT HON. G EORGE 8. GODARD .... HARTFOKD STATE L IBRARIAN HON. F REDERICK J. KINQSBURY, LL.D. WATERBURY MEMBER C ORPORATION TALE UNIVERSITY CAPTAIN E DWARD W. MARSH .... BRIDGEPORT TREASURER P EOPLE'S SAVINGS BANK COL.. N G. OSBORN NEW HAVEN EWEDITOR N HAVEN REGISTER HON. H ENRY ROBERTS HARTFORD GOVERNOR HON. J ONATHAN TRUMBULL .... NORWICH LIBRARIAN P UBLIC LIBRARY ...1 WHAT C ONNECTICUT STANDS FOR INHE T HISTORYF O THE NATION THE E nglish settlement of the territory now included in the State of Connecticut was three-fold in origin and purpose, as it was in place. Soon, however, the three streams of history and of influence were merged into one, and the annals of the colony and the State show how they were combined and what has been the strength of the resultant force in character and in action. There came to Wethersfield, Windsor, and Hartford in 1635 (following the steps of earlier emigrants from Plymouth, who made no permanent settlement) a band of men who had been given, not ungrudgingly, permission to remove from the colony of Massachusetts Bay. Their leaders were men of strong character and of strong will under the restraint of sound judgment. Thomas Hooker and Roger Ludlow, with whom we might name William Pynchon, though he never really came under the jurisdiction of the new colony, were not satisfied with the ecclesiastical and civil principles which prevailed in Boston and its neighborhood. They came with their followers to the western bank of the Great River, then the very limit of civilization, that they might found a commonwealth which should be puritanically religious on its religious side, but in which citizenship should not be dependent on church membership, and laws should have their binding force from the will of those who were to be governed by them. It was a settlement made by practical men under the guid ance of a practical preacher and a practical lawyer. In the same year John Winthrop, the younger, representing a company in which the names of Lord Say and Sele and Lord Brook were prominent, sent a party to build a fort at the mouth of the Connecticut River. Lieutenant Lion Gardiner was put in command of the garrison, and the place became for a few years the seat of an independent govern ment. Soon merged in Connecticut, it contributed to it no small part of the experience of the Pequot War, and helped at least to 1|J W HAT CONNECTICUT STANDS FOU given a element of caution in meeting danger, combined with vigor in warding it off. Three years later, in 1638, another company came from England by way of Boston, and took up their home at the fair haven — they presently called it the New Haven — at the mouth of the Quinnipiack. They were independents, like the pilgrims who had settled Plymonth ; there was among them a strange combination of spirit of almost fanatical ecclesiasticism and a spirit of commercial adventure; they were led by the theologian, John Davenport, and the wealthy merchant, Theophilus Eaton; they expected to found a theocracy in which the saints should rule, and they hoped to increase the worldly prosperity of which some of their number already had a goodly share. With this company there were affiliated from the next year Milford and Guilford, the latter being the best example of a community of yeomen devoted to agriculture. Doubtless the religious and civil history of the future State was largely molded by the founders of the River colony, while its record for neighborli- ness and bravery may be traced back to Saybrook fort; and speaking generally, we look to New Haven for strong intellectual influences and for the sources of material prosperity fostered by invention and secured by trade. Earlyn i 1639 the freemen of the three towns in the River colony met in a general assembly and, adopting the first written constitu tion in history, " associated and conjoined themselves to be one public state or commonwealth." The government which they estab lished, with no recognition of King or parliament or of any devolved authority, was a pure democracy, the example and pattern of all the democracies in this land or elsewhere; and the recognition of the three towns, each with its reserved rights, was also the example and pattern of all true federal governments. The germ of the Nation was in that assembly of citizens and in their work, and all the history of our land has been profoundly affected by it. As its immediate consequence there sprang at once into existence an abso lutely independent state; its members were citizens of England, and not unwilling to be called by the name, but they could hardly be called English subjects, and their commonwealth, though a colony, was not a dependency of the crown. When, at the restoration of the monarchy in the mother country, Winthrop presented a petition for a charter and a charter was granted, it was not asked or given INHE T HISTORY OP THE NATION for t he bestowal of rights or the creation of obligations; on the con trary, it contained an acknowledgment on the part of what was vaguely recognized as having a permanent authority over the land, of the existing condition of things. So liberal was it in its provis ions, that one wonders how it was brought about that the sovereign and his counsellors ever gave their approval to it ; and so well adapted was it to the needs of the people here that for more than forty years after the Declaration of Independence it was retained as the funda mental law of the state. In but one instance, that, namely, of Sir Edmund Andros, was Connecticut called upon to submit to a gov ernor who was not of her own choice; she followed her own laws, and not those of the English parliament until she formally adopted them as her own; she distributed estates according to the Scripture rule which she had accepted and in defiance of the English statutes, and her action was upheld by the supreme tribunal across the sea; she even refused the writ of habeas corpus because her legislature had not formally incorporated it in her code. And all this she did quietly and soberly. " The consistent policy of Connecticut," says an historian — and it would be easy to prove the assertion in detail through many years — " was to avoid notoriety and public attitudes ; to secure her privileges without attracting needless notice; to act as intensely and vigorously as possible when action seemed necessary and promising; but to say as little as possible, yield as little as possible, and evade as much as possible when open resistance was evident folly. Her line of public conduct was precisely the same after as before 1662 (the date of the charter). And its success was re markable; it is safe to say that the diplomatic skill, forethought, and self-control shown by the men who guided the course of Con necticut daring this period have seldom been equaled on the larger fields of the world's history.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Challenging Perceptions of the Lawyer As Civic Linchpin In
    Where Did All the Lawyers Go? Challenging Perceptions of the Lawyer as Civic Linchpin in New Haven: 1830‐1890 By: Leslie Esbrook1 ‐But above all a lawyer will find his highest honor in a deserved reputation for fidelity to private trust and to public duty, as an honest man and as a patriotic and loyal citizen. –The Final Prays of the Canon of Ethics2 Lawyers have traditionally been portrayed as models for civic representation, epitomized by their role in the founding of the Republic. In recent studies a consensus has formed around the idea that the legal profession lost its civic‐mindedness, sometime between the nineteenth and beginning of the twentieth centuries. Consequently, the story goes, lawyers have lost a key part of the profession that elevated the law to a higher plane compared to other career paths. This paper will explore the history of this shift using New Haven and the greater Connecticut forum for empirical data. The paper will challenge the historical narrative by detailing internal inconsistencies amongst leading scholars, both in terms of time frame of decline and the amount and kind of civic participation envisioned as exemplary. I will show that, at least at the local level in New Haven, the shift of lawyers as history remembers did not occur in a radical, sudden fashion at all; by the end of the century a non‐trivial amount of lawyers continued to fully participate in civic life. Finally, I will track prevalent theories behind the myth of the lawyer’s civic decline and superimpose them on the facts relative to New Haven to show that the conflicting results accrued from the data support the absence of causal findings for the current theories in vogue.
    [Show full text]
  • LINCOLN's OFFICIAL FAMILY-Bffiuography
    LINCOLN LORE Bulletin of the Lincoln National Life Foundation -- --- Dr. Louis A. WarreniEditor Published each week by The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, Fort Wayne, ndlana Number 753 FORT WAYNE, INDIANA September 13, 1943 LINCOLN'S OFFICIAL FAMILY-BffiUOGRAPHY Sometimes the appearance of a new Salmon P. Chase, 1861-1864 Seward, F. W., Stward at Wa8hington book will call to the attention of the 1.18 Senat<w and Secretary of State, public a considerable number of titles Schuckers, J. W., Life and Public Serv· ices of Salm<m Portland Clwse, 1846·1881, 650pp., 1891. with which it may be classified. Gideon Seward, F. W., Seward at Washington \Velles, Lincoln's Navy Department, 669pp., 1874. is such a book. Chase, S. P., AgaimJt tl~ Re,Jealof the as Sent~.t<w and Secretary of State, Missottri Prohibition of Suwery, 1861-187!, 561pp., 1891. Just outside the pale which separates 16pJ>., 1854. Bancroft, F., Life of William H. Sew· Lincolniana from a general library is ard, 2 vols., 1900. an indefinite number of books called Luthin, R. H., Salmon P. Chase'tt P(}o­ collateral items. A bibliography of this litical Career Bef&re the Civil ll'ar. Seward, 0. R., William H. Seward's (23) pp., 1943. Travel• Arormd the World, 730pp., large number of Lincoln J'cference 1873. items has never been attempted, except Chase, S. P., Diary and Cor-rcttpon· in Civil War compilations, where many tlence of S. P. Cl1.0.11c, 2 vols., 1903. Seward, W. H., Recent SpeecJwg and of them properly belong, yet, most of Writing• of William H.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017-2018 Wisconsin Blue Book: Election Results
    ELECTION RESULTS County vote for superintendent of public instruction, February 21, 2017 spring primary Tony Evers* Lowell E. Holtz John Humphries Total Adams . 585 264 95 948 Ashland. 893 101 49 1,047 Barron. 1,190 374 172 1,740 Bayfield . 1,457 178 96 1,732 Brown. 8,941 2,920 1,134 13,011 Buffalo . 597 178 66 843 Burnett ���������������������������������������������������������������������������� 393 165 66 625 Calumet . 1,605 594 251 2,452 Chippewa . 1,922 572 242 2,736 Clark. 891 387 166 1,447 Columbia. 2,688 680 299 3,670 Crawford ������������������������������������������������������������������������� 719 130 86 939 Dane . 60,046 4,793 2,677 67,720 Dodge . 2,407 1,606 306 4,325 Door. 1,602 350 133 2,093 Douglas. 2,089 766 809 3,701 Dunn . 1,561 342 147 2,054 Eau Claire. 5,437 912 412 6,783 Florence . 97 52 18 167 Fond du Lac ������������������������������������������������������������������� 3,151 1,726 495 5,388 Forest ������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 241 92 41 375 Grant . 2,056 329 240 2,634 Green ������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 1,888 379 160 2,439 Green Lake. 462 251 95 809 Iowa . 1,989 311 189 2,498 Iron . 344 106 43 494 Jackson . 675 187 91 955 Jefferson ������������������������������������������������������������������������� 3,149 1,544 305 5,016 Juneau . 794 287 110 1,195 Kenosha . 4,443 1,757 526 6,780 Kewaunee ���������������������������������������������������������������������� 619 218 85 923 La Crosse . 5,992 848 632 7,486 Lafayette ������������������������������������������������������������������������� 814 172 105 1,094 Langlade ������������������������������������������������������������������������� 515 201 103 820 Lincoln ���������������������������������������������������������������������������� 843 280 117 1,245 Manitowoc. 2,656 1,405 543 4,616 Marathon.
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee State Library and Archives WASHINGTON FAMILY PAPERS
    State of Tennessee Department of State Tennessee State Library and Archives 403 Seventh Avenue North Nashville, Tennessee 37243-0312 WASHINGTON FAMILY PAPERS, 1796-1962 Processed by Harry A. Stokes Accession numbers: 83-001; 84-001; 89-131 Microfilm accession number: Mf. 961 Dates completed: Jan. 24, 1983; Mar. 16, 1984 Locations: XVII-F-K-1; VI-C-1v; oversize flat storage - top of map cases The Washington Family Papers, 1796-1962, are centered around “Wessyngton,” the Washington family home built in 1818 by Joseph Washington, tobacco planter, near Cedar Hill in Robertson County, Tennessee. The papers contain records of the plantation as well as the correspondence of four generations: Joseph Washington (1770-1848), tobacco planter; George Augustine Washington (1815-1892), tobacco planter, railroad executive, and capitalist; Joseph Edwin Washington (1851-1915), Congressman and tobacco farmer; and George Augustine Washington (1879- 1964), attorney, tobacco farmer, and genealogist. The papers were gifts of Mrs. Mary Kinsolving, Baltimore, Md.; Hickman Price, Jr., Palm Beach, Fla.; and Mrs. Anne K. Talbott, Cookeville, Tenn. Linear feet of shelf space occupied: 64 Approximate number of items: ca. 11,200 Single photocopies of unpublished writings in the Washington Family Papers may be made for purposes of scholarly research. WASHINGTON FAMILY PAPERS , 1796-1962 7/if. 91/ Microf1lm Container List Reel No . : 1. Box 1, folder 1 to Box 2, folder 10 2. Box 2, folder 11 to Box 5 , folder 9 3. Box 5, folder 10 to Box 8 , folder 8 4. Box 8. folder 9 to Box 10, folder 16 5. Box 10, folder 17 to Box 13, folder 18 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Official U.S. Bulletin
    : — : : : : k PVBLISHEn BJilLY under order of THE PRESIDENT of THE UNITED STATES by COMMITTEE on PUBLIC INFORMATION GEORGE CREEL, Chairman -k * ic COMPLETE Record of U. S, GOVERNMENT Activities VoL. 3 WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, FEBRUAEY 11, 1919. No. 535 TRADE WITH FINLAND MAY BE ORDERS TO COMPLETE PAY Army Post Exchanges RESUMED UNDER REGULATION OF SOLDIERS IN ARREARS Are Forbidden to Sell Unauthorized Insignia SAYS THE WAR TRADE BOARD ARRIVING AT CAMPS WITH The War Department authorizes OUTLINE OF PROCEDURE IS GIVEN A “CONVALESCENT CENTER” publication of the following Under direction of the Secretary List of Commodities Which Do Not of War an order has been issued as INSTRUCTIONS ALSO follows Require Import Certificates From 1. “ It has been brought to the Inter-Allied Trade Committee SENT ARMY HOSPITALS attention of the War Department if that post exchanges and similar Applications Are in Order. Detachment Commanders places are selling unauthorized in- signia such as service ribbons and The War Trade Board announces, in a and Disbursing Officers gold and silver stars to be worn on new ruling (W. T. B. R. 590), supple- the uniform.” Required to See That En- menting AV. T. B. R. 577, issued February 2. “ Responsible officers will take 5, 1919, that arrangements have now been immediate steps to have such listed Men Are Promptly made whereby both export shipments to practice discontinued by post ex- and import shipments from Finland may Paid Reports to changes and stores under their im- — Be Made be resumed. mediate jurisdiction. At the same All shipments for export to tlie above- by Wire Direct to Director time every effort will be made to mentioned country must be covered by an influence stores located near posts, of Finance, War Depart- import certificate issued by the interallied camps, or cantonments, discon- to trade committee, at Helsingfors, except tinue the practice.” ment, Washington.
    [Show full text]
  • The Frontiers of American Grand Strategy: Settlers, Elites, and the Standing Army in America’S Indian Wars
    THE FRONTIERS OF AMERICAN GRAND STRATEGY: SETTLERS, ELITES, AND THE STANDING ARMY IN AMERICA’S INDIAN WARS A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Government By Andrew Alden Szarejko, M.A. Washington, D.C. August 11, 2020 Copyright 2020 by Andrew Alden Szarejko All Rights Reserved ii THE FRONTIERS OF AMERICAN GRAND STRATEGY: SETTLERS, ELITES, AND THE STANDING ARMY IN AMERICA’S INDIAN WARS Andrew Alden Szarejko, M.A. Thesis Advisor: Andrew O. Bennett, Ph.D. ABSTRACT Much work on U.S. grand strategy focuses on the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. If the United States did have a grand strategy before that, IR scholars often pay little attention to it, and when they do, they rarely agree on how best to characterize it. I show that federal political elites generally wanted to expand the territorial reach of the United States and its relative power, but they sought to expand while avoiding war with European powers and Native nations alike. I focus on U.S. wars with Native nations to show how domestic conditions created a disjuncture between the principles and practice of this grand strategy. Indeed, in many of America’s so- called Indian Wars, U.S. settlers were the ones to initiate conflict, and they eventually brought federal officials into wars that the elites would have preferred to avoid. I develop an explanation for settler success and failure in doing so. I focus on the ways that settlers’ two faits accomplis— the act of settling on disputed territory without authorization and the act of initiating violent conflict with Native nations—affected federal decision-making by putting pressure on speculators and local elites to lobby federal officials for military intervention, by causing federal officials to fear that settlers would create their own states or ally with foreign powers, and by eroding the credibility of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • All Saints Church, Waccamaw Photo Hy Ski1,11Er
    All Saints Church, Waccamaw Photo hy Ski1,11er ALL SAINTS' CHURCH, WACCAMAW THE PARISH: THE· PLACE: THE PEOPLE. ---•-•.o• ◄ 1739-1948 by HENRY DeSAUSSURE BULL Published by The Historical Act-ivities Committee of the South Carolina Sociefy o'f' Colonial Dames of America 1948 fl'IIINTED 8Y JOHN J. FURLONG a SONS CHARLESTON, 5, C, This volume is dedicated to the memo,-y of SARAH CONOVER HOLMES VON KOLNITZ in grateful appr.eciation of her keen interest in the history of our State. Mrs. Von Kolnit& held the following offices in the South Carolina Society of Colonial Dames of America : President 193S-1939 Honorary President 1939-1943 Chairman of Historic Activities Committte 1928-1935 In 1933 she had the honor of being appointed Chairman of Historic Activities Committee of the National Society of Colonial Dames of America ·which office she held with con­ spicuous ability until her death on April 6th 1943. CHURCH, W ACCAMA ALL SAINTS' • 'Ai 5 CHAPTER I - BEGINNING AND GROWTH All Saint's Parish includes the whole of vVaccamaw peninsula, that narrow tongue of land lying along the coast of South Caro~ lina, bounded on the east by the Atlantic and on the \Vest by the Waccamaw River which here flo\vs almost due south and empties into Winyah Bay. The length of the "N eek" from Fraser's Point to the Horry County line just north of Murrell's Inlet is about thirty miles and the width of the high land varies f rorii two to three miles. The :place takes its name from the \Vac~ camaws, a small Indian tribe of the locality who belonged ·to a loose conf ederacv..
    [Show full text]
  • Badges of Slavery : the Struggle Between Civil Rights and Federalism During Reconstruction
    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Electronic Theses and Dissertations 5-2013 Badges of slavery : the struggle between civil rights and federalism during reconstruction. Vanessa Hahn Lierley 1981- University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd Recommended Citation Lierley, Vanessa Hahn 1981-, "Badges of slavery : the struggle between civil rights and federalism during reconstruction." (2013). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 831. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/831 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BADGES OF SLAVERY: THE STRUGGLE BETWEEN CIVIL RIGHTS AND FEDERALISM DURING RECONSTRUCTION By Vanessa Hahn Liedey B.A., University of Kentucky, 2004 A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of the University of Louisville in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Department of History University of Louisville Louisville, KY May 2013 BADGES OF SLAVERY: THE STRUGGLE BETWEEN CIVIL RIGHTS AND FEDERALISM DURING RECONSTRUCTION By Vanessa Hahn Lierley B.A., University of Kentucky, 2004 A Thesis Approved on April 19, 2013 by the following Thesis Committee: Thomas C. Mackey, Thesis Director Benjamin Harrison Jasmine Farrier ii DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to my husband Pete Lierley who always showed me support throughout the pursuit of my Master's degree.
    [Show full text]
  • The Governors of Connecticut, 1905
    ThegovernorsofConnecticut Norton CalvinFrederick I'his e dition is limited to one thousand copies of which this is No tbe A uthor Affectionately Dedicates Cbis Book Co George merriman of Bristol, Connecticut "tbe Cruest, noblest ana Best friend T €oer fia<T Copyrighted, 1 905, by Frederick Calvin Norton Printed by Dorman Lithographing Company at New Haven Governors Connecticut Biographies o f the Chief Executives of the Commonwealth that gave to the World the First Written Constitution known to History By F REDERICK CALVIN NORTON Illustrated w ith reproductions from oil paintings at the State Capitol and facsimile sig natures from official documents MDCCCCV Patron's E dition published by THE CONNECTICUT MAGAZINE Company at Hartford, Connecticut. ByV I a y of Introduction WHILE I w as living in the home of that sturdy Puritan governor, William Leete, — my native town of Guil ford, — the idea suggested itself to me that inasmuch as a collection of the biographies of the chief executives of Connecticut had never been made, the work would afford an interesting and agreeable undertaking. This was in the year 1895. 1 began the task, but before it had far progressed it offered what seemed to me insurmountable obstacles, so that for a time the collection of data concerning the early rulers of the state was entirely abandoned. A few years later the work was again resumed and carried to completion. The manuscript was requested by a magazine editor for publication and appeared serially in " The Connecticut Magazine." To R ev. Samuel Hart, D.D., president of the Connecticut Historical Society, I express my gratitude for his assistance in deciding some matters which were subject to controversy.
    [Show full text]
  • Genealogy of the Fenner Family
    GENEALOGY OF THE Fenner Family -c^^o^. No ^ ^. ROOT. j-NewP(?-RT,K. I., ii^2: /] ('jlL 4{j6 [Reprinted from the Rhode Island Historical Magazine.] SKETCH OF CAPT. ARTHUR FENNER, OF PROVI- DENCE. A PAPER READ BEFOliE THE E. I. HISTORICAL SOCIETY, MARCH 23 AND APRIL 6, 1886, BY REV. J. P. ROOT. fLYMOUTH had its valiant Capt. Miles Standish. Prov- idence could boast of its brave and wise Capt. Arthur Fenner. If the former became more noted for his military exploits, the latter was more distinguished for commanding ability in the conduct of civil affairs. The Providence Cap- tain was less hasty and imperious in spirit than Standish, not so quick to buckle on the sword, but he may be pardoned for the possession of a more peaceable frame of mind. He certainly did not seek to make occasion for the practice of his military skill. It is generally admitted that Williams and the other colonists of our own plantation adopted and quite steadily pursued a more liberal and humane policy to- wards the Aborigines than prevailed in either of the colo- nies about her.( Fenner was not only a soldier, but was pos- sessed of statesmanlike qualities of no mean nature. He was also an expert engineer and^urveyDr. In his varied re- lations to town and colonial ^ife he shewed himself a man of admirable genius, with a mind well balanced and sagacious. His comprehensive qualities made him an energetic, shrewd and trustworthy leader in practical affairs. His age, midway between the older and the younger inhabitants, brought him into sympathy with men both of the first and second gen- erations.
    [Show full text]
  • Yearbook02chic.Pdf
    41 *( ^^Wk. _ f. CHICAGO LITERARY CLUB 1695-56 CHICAGO LITERARY CLUB YEAR-BOOK FOR 1895-96 Officer* for 1895-96 President. JOHN HENRY BARROWS. Vice-Presidents. FRANK H. SCOTT, HENRY S. BOUTELL, JAMES A. HUNT. Corresponding Secretary. DANIEL GOODWIN. Recording Secretary and Treasurer. FREDERICK W. GOOKIN. The above officers constitute the Board of Directors. Committees On Officers and Members. FRANK H. SCOTT, Chairman. ALLEN B. POND, ARTHUR D. WHEELER, THOMAS D. MARSTON, GEORGE L. PADDOCK. On Arrangements and Exercises. HENRY S. BOUTELL,C/tairman. EMILIUS C. DUDLEY, CHARLES G. FULLER, EDWARD O. BROWN, SIGMUND ZEISLER. On Rooms and Finance. JAMES A. HUNT, Chairman. WILLIAM R. STIRLING, JOHN H. HAMLINE, GEORGE H. HOLT, JAMES J. WAIT. On Publications. LEWIS H. BOUTELL, Chairman. FRANKLIN H. HEAD, CLARENCE A. BURLEY. Literarp Club Founded March 13, 1874 Incorporated July 10, 1886 ROBERT COLLYER, 1874-75 CHARLES B. LAWRENCE, 1875-76 HOSMER A. JOHNSON, 1876-77 DANIEL L. SHOREY, 1877-78 EDWARD G. MASON, . 1878-79 WILLIAM F. POOLE, 1879-80 BROOKE HERFORD, i 880-8 i EDWIN C. LARNED, 1881-82 GEORGE ROWLAND, . 1882-83 HENRY A. HUNTINGTON, 1883-84 CHARLES GILMAN SMITH, 1884-85 JAMES S. NORTON, 1885-86 ALEXANDER C. McCLURG, 1886-87 GEORGE C. NOYES, 1887-88 JAMES L. HIGH, . 1888-89 JAMES NEVINS HYDE, 1889-90 FRANKLIN H. HEAD, . 1890-91 CLINTON LOCKE, . 1891-92 LEWIS H. BOUTELL, . 1892-93 HORATIO L. WAIT, 1893-94 WILLIAM ELIOT FURNESS, 1894-95 JOHN HENRY BARROWS, 1895-96 Besfoent George E. Adams, Eliphalet W. Blatchford, Joseph Adams, Louis J. Block, Owen F.
    [Show full text]
  • Abraham Lincoln Papers
    Abraham Lincoln papers From Thomas Worcester to Abraham Lincoln, May 16, 1864 Dear Sir, It is a constant subject of thankfulness with me, that you are where you are. And it is my belief that the Divine Providence is using your honesty, kindness, patience and intelligence as means of carrying us through our present troubles. 1 I see that you hesitate with regard to retaliation, and I am glad of it. Your feelings of kindness and regard to justice do not allow you to take the severe course, which is most obvious. Now I feel great confidence that you will be led to the best conclusions; but while you are hesitating, I am tempted to offer a suggestion. 1 This is a reference to the Fort Pillow massacre that occurred on April 12 when black soldiers attempted to surrender and were given no quarter. Lincoln carefully considered an appropriate response to this outrage. On May 3, he convened a meeting of the cabinet and requested each member to submit a written opinion that recommended a course of action to take in response to the massacre. At a cabinet meeting on May 6, each member read his opinion on the case and after receiving this advice, Lincoln began to draft a set of instructions for Secretary of War Stanton to implement. Apparently Lincoln became distracted by other matters, such as Grant's campaign against Lee and these instructions were neither completed nor submitted to the War Department. For the written opinions of the cabinet, see Edward Bates to Lincoln, May 4, 1864; William H.
    [Show full text]