DOCSLIB.ORG

Political Change: India - L2095 - Rekha Diwakar (Aut) | Sussex University

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Political Change: India - L2095 - Rekha Diwakar (Aut) | Sussex University 09/26/21 Political Change: India - L2095 - Rekha Diwakar (Aut) | Sussex University Political Change: India - L2095 - Rekha View Online Diwakar (Aut) Adeney, K. and Wyatt, A. (2010) Contemporary India. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/suss/detail.action?docID=4763553. A H Hanson (Albert Henry) (1966) The Process of Planning : a Study of India’s Five-year Plans, 1950-1964. Oxford University Press. Ahuja, A. and Chhibber, P. (no date) ‘Why the Poor Vote in India: “If I Don”t Vote, I Am Dead to the State”’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 47(4), pp. 389–410. doi: 10.1007/s12116-012-9115-6. Asia Society (1999) India briefing: a transformative fifty years. Edited by M. M. Bouton and P. Oldenburg. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe. Austin, G. (2011) Working a democratic constitution: a history of the Indian experience. New Delhi: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195656107.001.0001. Banerjee, A. et al. (2014) ‘Are Poor Voters Indifferent to Whether Elected Leaders Are Criminal or Corrupt? A Vignette Experiment in Rural India’, Political Communication, 31(3), pp. 391–407. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2014.914615. Banerjee, A. and Somanathan, R. (no date) ‘The political economy of public goods: Some evidence from India’, Journal of Development Economics, 82(2). doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2006.04.005. Bardhan, P. (no date a) ‘Corruption and Development: A Review of Issues’, Journal of Economic Literature, 35(3), pp. 1320–1346. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2729979. Bardhan, P. (no date b) ‘Corruption and Development Policy (Drawing Upon the Recent Indian Debate)’, Journal of Public Economic Theory, 17(4), pp. 472–479. doi: 10.1111/jpet.12126. Bardhan, P. K. and Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs. Center of International Studies (1988) India’s democracy: an analysis of changing state-society relations. Edited by A. Kohli. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/suss/detail.action?docID=3030869. Basu, A. and Kohli, A. (1999) Community conflicts and the state in India. Delhi: Oxford University Press. 1/14 09/26/21 Political Change: India - L2095 - Rekha Diwakar (Aut) | Sussex University Bhagwati, J. N., Desai, P. and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Development Centre (1970) India: planning for industrialization ; industrialization and trade policies since 1951. London: Oxford University Press. Blair, H. W. (no date) ‘Mrs Gandhi’s Emergency, The Indian Elections of 1977, Pluralism and Marxism: Problems with Paradigms’, Modern Asian Studies, 14(02), pp. 237–271. doi: 10.1017/S0026749X00007320. Bose, S. (2013a) Transforming India: challenges to the world’s largest democracy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. Bose, S. (2013b) Transforming India: challenges to the world’s largest democracy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. Brass, P. R. (1987a) The politics of India since independence. Second. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781316257005. Brass, P. R. (1987b) The politics of India since independence. Second. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781316257005. Brass, P. R. (1987c) The politics of India since independence. Second. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781316257005. Brass, P. R. (1987d) The politics of India since independence. Second. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781316257005. Brass, P. R. (1994a) The politics of India since independence. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Brass, P. R. (1994b) The politics of India since independence. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Brass, P. R. (1994c) The politics of India since independence. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Brass, P. R. (1994d) The politics of India since independence. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chakrabarty, B. (no date) ‘Jawaharlal Nehru and Planning, 1938–41: India at the Crossroads’, Modern Asian Studies, 26(02), pp. 275–287. doi: 10.1017/S0026749X00009781. Chandra, K. (2003a) ‘Why Ethnic Parties Succeed: Patronage and Ethnic Headcounts in India’, eScholarship: University of California, Theory and Research in Comparative Social Analysis. Available at: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/0vb620b2. Chandra, K. (2003b) ‘Why Ethnic Parties Succeed: Patronage and Ethnic Headcounts in India’, eScholarship: University of California. Available at: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/0vb620b2. Chandra, K. (2003c) ‘Why Ethnic Parties Succeed: Patronage and Ethnic Headcounts in India’, eScholarship: University of California, Theory and Research in Comparative Social 2/14 09/26/21 Political Change: India - L2095 - Rekha Diwakar (Aut) | Sussex University Analysis. Available at: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/0vb620b2. Chandra, K. (2004) Why ethnic parties succeed: patronage and ethnic head counts in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108573481. Chandra, K. (ed.) (2016) Democratic dynasties: state, party, and family in contemporary Indian politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781316402221. Chhibber, P. (no date) ‘Who voted for the Bharatiya Janata Party?’, British Journal of Political Science, 27(4), pp. 631–639. doi: 10.1017/S0007123497220296. Chhibber, P. K. and Kollman, K. (2004a) The formation of national party systems: federalism and party competition in Canada, Great Britain, India, and the United States. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt7sb3j. Chhibber, P. K. and Kollman, K. (2004b) The formation of national party systems: federalism and party competition in Canada, Great Britain, India, and the United States. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt7sb3j. Chhibber, P. K. and Kollman, K. (2004c) The formation of national party systems: federalism and party competition in Canada, Great Britain, India, and the United States. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt7sb3j. Chhibber, P. and Kollman, K. (no date) ‘Party Aggregation and the Number of Parties in India and the United States’, American Political Science Review, 92(02), pp. 329–342. doi: 10.2307/2585667. Chhibber, P. and Nooruddin, I. (2004) ‘Do Party Systems Count?’, Comparative Political Studies, 37(2), pp. 152–187. doi: 10.1177/0010414003260981. ‘Constitution of India’ (no date) india.gov.in: National Portal of India. Available at: https://www.india.gov.in/my-government/constitution-india. Corbridge, S. and Harriss, J. (2000a) Reinventing India: liberalisation, Hindu nationalism and popular democracy. Cambridge: Polity. Available at: http://eu01.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&pa ckage_service_id=10395977700002461&institutionId=2461&customerId=2460. Corbridge, S. and Harriss, J. (2000b) Reinventing India: liberalization, Hindu nationalism and popular democracy. Cambridge: Polity. Corbridge, S. and Harriss, J. (2000c) Reinventing India: liberalization, Hindu nationalism and popular democracy. Cambridge: Polity. Corbridge, S. and Harriss, J. (2000d) Reinventing India: liberalization, Hindu nationalism and popular democracy. Cambridge: Polity. 3/14 09/26/21 Political Change: India - L2095 - Rekha Diwakar (Aut) | Sussex University Corbridge, S. and Harriss, J. (2000e) Reinventing India: liberalization, Hindu nationalism and popular democracy. Cambridge: Polity. Corbridge, S. and Harriss, J. (2000f) Reinventing India: liberalization, Hindu nationalism and popular democracy. Cambridge: Polity. Corbridge, S. and Harriss, J. (2013a) Reinventing India: liberalization, Hindu nationalism and popular democracy. Hoboken: Wiley. Available at: http://suss.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1323189. Corbridge, S. and Harriss, J. (2013b) Reinventing India: liberalization, Hindu nationalism and popular democracy. Hoboken: Wiley. Available at: http://suss.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1323189. Corbridge, S. and Harriss, J. (2013c) Reinventing India: liberalization, Hindu nationalism and popular democracy. Hoboken: Wiley. Available at: http://suss.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1323189. Corbridge, S. and Harriss, J. (2013d) Reinventing India: liberalization, Hindu nationalism and popular democracy. Hoboken: Wiley. Available at: http://suss.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1323189. Corbridge, S. and Harriss, J. (2013e) Reinventing India: liberalization, Hindu nationalism and popular democracy. Hoboken: Wiley. Available at: http://suss.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1323189. Corbridge, S. and Harriss, J. (2013f) Reinventing India: liberalization, Hindu nationalism and popular democracy. Hoboken: Wiley. Available at: http://suss.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1323189. Crabtree, J. (2012) ‘India’s uncertain future’, Public Policy Research, 19(2), pp. 132–136. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-540X.2012.00697.x. Currie, B. (1996) ‘Governance, democracy and economic adjustment in India: Conceptual and empirical problems’, Third World Quarterly, 17(4), pp. 787–808. doi: 10.1080/01436599615380. Deaton, A. (7AD) ‘Poverty and Inequality in India: A Re-Examination’, Economic and Political Weekly, 37(36), pp. 3729–3748. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4412578. Diwakar, R. (2007a) ‘Duverger’s Law and the Size of the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Indian Government and Politics Ii Indian Government and Politics Indian Government and Politics
    Indian Government and Politics ii Indian Government and Politics Indian Government and Politics Bidyut Chakrabarty Rajendra Kumar Pandey Copyright © Bidyut Chakrabarty and Rajendra Kumar Pandey, 2008 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. First published in 2008 by SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd B 1/I-1 Mohan Cooperative Industrial Area Mathura Road, New Delhi 110 044, India www.sagepub.in SAGE Publications Inc 2455 Teller Road Thousand Oaks, California 91320, USA SAGE Publications Ltd 1 OliverÊs Yard, 55 City Road London EC1Y 1SP, United Kingdom SAGE Publications Asia-Pacific Pte Ltd 33 Pekin Street #02-01 Far East Square Singapore 048763 Published by Vivek Mehra for SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd, typeset in 10/12 pt Palatino by Star Compugraphics Private Limited, Delhi and printed at Chaman Enterprises, New Delhi. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Chakrabarty, Bidyut, 1958ă Indian government and politics/Bidyut Chakrabarty, Rajendra Kumar Pandey. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. India·Politics and governement. 2. Constitutional history·India. 3. Public administration·India. I. Pandey, Rajedra Kumar. II. Title JQ231.C42 320.454·dc22 2008 2008031601 ISBN: 978-81-7829-881-8 (PB) The SAGE Team: Anjana Saproo, Anupam Choudhury, Sanjeev Kumar Sharma, and Trinankur Banerjee Dedicated
    [Show full text]
  • How Has Indian Federalism Done?
    Military-Madrasa-MullahAArticle Global Threat Complex 4343 Studies in Indian Politics How has Indian Federalism Done? 1(1) 43–63 © 2013 Lokniti, Centre for the Study of Developing Societies SAGE Publications Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC Ashutosh Varshney DOI: 10.1177/2321023013482787 http://inp.sagepub.com Abstract Two tropes have dominated discussions of Indian federalism: fiscal and constitutional. Isolated exceptions aside, scholars have not linked India’s federalism to comparative theories of nationalism, or to a comparative exploration of national identities. To examine how India’s federalism has done, we may also need to ask what kind of nation India is. Once we answer that question, the oft-assumed binary—that the stronger the states are, the weaker the centre will be–loses its edge. Both can be simultaneously strong. The new exception may be the problem of cross-border terrorism, which indeed generates a binary for the new age. Secessionism also creates centre–state binaries, but that may be more on account of how the basic ideational principles of Indian nationhood have been violated, not followed, or about how far the historical process of nation-building penetrated the rebellious regions. Such problems have not been about the basic flaws of Indian federalism. Keywords State–nation, nation–state, multicultural nation, linguistic states, cross-cutting identities, cross-border terrorism This article departs from the conventional work on India’s federalism1. Most traditional scholarship took two forms. The focus was either on what is called fiscal federalism, or on strictly constitutional matters. The literature on fiscal federalism revolved around resource transfers from the centre to the states: its logic, equity and quantum.
    [Show full text]
  • Coalition Governments in India: the Way Forward
    International Journal of Research in Engineering, IT and Social Sciences ISSN 2250-0558, Impact Factor: 6.452, Volume 6 Issue 03, March 2016 Coalition governments in India: The way forward Veena.K Assistant professor, Department of Political Science & Research scholar (BU), Government Arts College, Bangalore -560001 ABSTRACT Indian federal system says clearly the „distribution of power „has been assured by the constitution for the „effective administration‟ and it is reflected in Indian parliamentary democracy. India has a multi party system where there is a number of national and regional political party because of which there is an emergence of coalition governments in India. The governments have been formed at the centre or at the state based on the „First –past- the- post-electoral system‟ in the Indian political system. Electoral politics of India before independence and after independence witnessed major changes in forming government, its running and completing of its tenure. Elections in India will be held once in five years to choose the leader and peoples‟ representatives, wherein the election commission and delimitation commission play significant roles. Indian democratically elected government is chosen by its large population of different sectors such as, region, religion, caste, language etc, but the uneven development of regions and non performance of national parties resulted in rise of regional political parties in India. Regional political parties are the pillars of the coalitions today in making or breaking but capturing the power is the ultimate goal of any of the party. Keywords: Democracy, Political Parties, Coalitions, Politics, Stability, regions, First-Past- The - Post, Governments Indian political system takes place within the framework of a constitution.
    [Show full text]
  • 70 POLICIES THAT SHAPED INDIA 1947 to 2017, Independence to $2.5 Trillion
    Gautam Chikermane POLICIES THAT SHAPED INDIA 70 POLICIES THAT SHAPED INDIA 1947 to 2017, Independence to $2.5 Trillion Gautam Chikermane Foreword by Rakesh Mohan © 2018 by Observer Research Foundation All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission in writing from ORF. ISBN: 978-81-937564-8-5 Printed by: Mohit Enterprises CONTENTS Foreword by Rakesh Mohan vii Introduction x The First Decade Chapter 1: Controller of Capital Issues, 1947 1 Chapter 2: Minimum Wages Act, 1948 3 Chapter 3: Factories Act, 1948 5 Chapter 4: Development Finance Institutions, 1948 7 Chapter 5: Banking Regulation Act, 1949 9 Chapter 6: Planning Commission, 1950 11 Chapter 7: Finance Commissions, 1951 13 Chapter 8: Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 15 Chapter 9: Indian Standards Institution (Certification Marks) Act, 1952 17 Chapter 10: Nationalisation of Air India, 1953 19 Chapter 11: State Bank of India Act, 1955 21 Chapter 12: Oil and Natural Gas Corporation, 1955 23 Chapter 13: Essential Commodities Act, 1955 25 Chapter 14: Industrial Policy Resolution, 1956 27 Chapter 15: Nationalisation of Life Insurance, 1956 29 The Second Decade Chapter 16: Institutes of Technology Act, 1961 33 Chapter 17: Food Corporation of India, 1965 35 Chapter 18: Agricultural Prices Commission, 1965 37 Chapter 19: Special Economic Zones, 1965 39 iv | 70 Policies that Shaped India The Third Decade Chapter 20: Public Provident Fund, 1968 43 Chapter 21: Nationalisation of Banks, 1969 45 Chapter
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution of India
    1 1 Module I CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Unit Structure 1.0 Objectives 1.1 Introduction 1.2 India's Constitution 1.3 Basic features of the Indian constitution 1.4 Conclusion 1.5 Unit end questions 1.0 OBJECTIVES Each and every institution functions according to certain basic rules. State is a political institution. The basic rules of the state are called constitution. As a citizen of India and the student of political science every person should know about the constitution. It make the learners enlightened citizen of this country. 1.1 INTRODUCTION The knowledge of the constitution of India is important as it lays the foundation for citizenship training. The study of the constitution aims at preparing citizens with greater consciousness. In this unit we will learn about following points: - 1. India’s Constitution 2. Basic features of the Indian constitution. 1.2 INDIA’S CONSTITUTION The constitution of India is made by constituent Assembly. According to the cabinet Mission plan, the legislative Assemblies of the provinces were to elect their representatives to the constituent Assembly. Total members of the constituent Assemblies were 389 Dr. Rajendra Prasad was elected as the President of the constituent Assembly. 2 Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru moved the objective Resolution which reflected the ideals and philosophy that shaped the Indian constitution. The constituent Assembly completed the work in two years eleven months and eighteen days. From 26th January 1950 constitution of India came in force. Hence, 26th January is celebrated as the Republic day. 1.3 BASIC FEATURES OF THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION 1.3.1 Meaning: The basic rules for the behaviour of members of a state are called the constitution of the state.
    [Show full text]
  • How Federalism Influences India's Domestic Politics of Wto Engagement
    HOW FEDERALISM INFLUENCES INDIA’S DOMESTIC POLITICS OF WTO ENGAGEMENT (And Is Itself Affected in the Process) Rob Jenkins Abstract India’s federal system has significantly influenced the way in which domestic political forces have reacted to the “multilateralization” (via World Trade Organ- ization agreements) of key areas of policymaking, particularly agriculture. State-level politicians tend to view World Trade Organization-related matters through regional lenses. In the process, Indian federalism itself has been sub- jected to certain, sometimes contradictory, changes. I.Introduction This paper examines one aspect of the complex relation- ship between globalization and federalism. The World Trade Organization (WTO) has become a potent symbol of at least one dimension of globaliza- tion: the multilateralization of national policymaking, a process by which is- sues that were once purely of domestic concern have become subjected to intergovernmental discipline. India’s engagement with the system of multi- lateral trade governance negotiated and administered through the WTO is influenced by many factors, including the sectoral composition of the Indian Rob Jenkins is Professor of Political Science at Birkbeck College, Uni- versity of London. This paper is based on work carried out under the Globalization and Poverty Research Program, funded by the U.K.’s Department for International Development. The author would like to acknowledge his debt to Francine Frankel, Jos Mooij, Aseema Sinha, and an anon- ymous referee for helpful comments on an earlier draft. Email: <[email protected]>. Asian Survey , 43:4, pp. 598–621. ISSN: 0004–4687 Ó 2003 by The Regents of the University of California.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Process in India
    BPSC-104 POLITICAL PROCESS IN INDIA School of Social Sciences Indira Gandhi National Open University EXPERT COMMITTEE Prof. D. Gopal (Chairman) Prof. Amit Prakash Prof. A. K. Singh Faculty of Political Science, Centre for the Study of Law and Centre for Federal Studies School of Social Sciences, Governance, Jamia Hamdard University IGNOU, Maidan Garhi, New Delhi Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi New Delhi Prof. SartikBagh Prof. S. V. Reddy Department of Political Science, Prof. Anurag Joshi Faculty of Political Science Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar Faculty of Political Science School of Social Sciences, University, School of Social Sciences Maidan Garhi Rae Bareli Road, Lucknow IGNOU, MaidanGarhi, IGNOU, New Delhi New Delhi Prof. Jagpal Singh Faculty of Political Science School of Social Sciences IGNOU, Maidan Garhi, New Delhi COURSE PREPARATION TEAM Blocks and Units Unit Writers BLOCK 1 POLITICAL PARTIES AND PARTY SYSTEM Unit 1 Political Parties, Party Systems and Democracy Dr. Divya Rani, Consultant, IGNOU, New Delhi Unit 2 Political Parties in India Dr. Divya Rani, Consultant, IGNOU, New Delhi Unit 3 Party Systems in India Dr. Divya Rani, Consultant, IGNOU, New Delhi BLOCK 2 DETERMINANTS OF VOTING BEHAVIOUR Unit 4 Caste, Class, Gender and Tribes Dr. Divya Rani, Consultant, IGNOU, New Delhi Unit 5 Ethnicity, Religion and Language Dr. Divya Rani, Consultant, IGNOU, New Delhi BLOCK 3 REGIONAL ASPIRATIONS AND MOVEMENTS Unit 6 Autonomy Movements Prof. Jagpal Singh, IGNOU, New Delhi Unit 7 Insurgency Dr. N. Kishorchand Singh, Consultant, IGNOU Unit 8 Movements for Separate Statehood Prof. Jagpal Singh, IGNOU, New Delhi BLOCK 4 RELIGION AND POLITICS Unit 9 Secularism Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • History, Semesters I and II: ‘Global/Non-Indian’ Courses
    Draft for M.A. History, Semesters I and II: ‘Global/Non-Indian’ Courses Revised Syllabus The Practice of History (Core Course, 1st semester) This foundation course aims to introduce students to important issues related to historical method by giving them a broad overview of significant, including recent, historiographical trends. The aim is to acquaint students with important historiographical interventions and issues related to the historian’s craft. The themes selected for discussion may include the ones given below, and may vary from year to year; more themes may be added to the list. Select readings have been given here; detailed readings will be provided in the course of instruction. 1. Pre-modern historical traditions 1. Modern historiography: documents and the archives 2. Cultural history 3. Marxism 4. Annales 5. Gender 6. Archaeology 7. Art and history 8. The environment 9. Oral history 10. Intellectual history 11. History of emotions 12. Connected histories: peoples regions, commodities Select Readings Alier, Joan Martinez, Padua, Jose Augusto and Rangarajan, Mahesh eds. Environmental History as if Nature Existed (Delhi, Oxford University Press, 2010) Aymard, Maurice and Mukhia, Harbans eds., French Studies in History, vol. I (Orient Longmans, New Delhi, 1989). Bloch, Marc, The Historian’s Craft, with an Introduction by Peter Burke (Manchester University Press, 2004). Burke, Peter, Varieties of Cultural History, Cornell University Press, 1997. Carr, E.H., What is History (also available in Hindi) (Penguin [1961], 2008). Davis, Natalie Zemon The Return of Martin Guerre (Harvard University Press, 1983) Haskell, Francis, History and its images: art and the interpretation of the past (New Haven and London, Yale University Press, [1993] 3rd reprint edn.
    [Show full text]
  • Aam Aadmi Party
    AAM AADMI PARTY DELHI ELECTION MANIFESTO 2013 SUMMARY 1. WHY VOTE FOR THE ‘AAM AADMI PARTY’? Elections happen every five years, but a chance to change the country is a rare occurrence. The upcoming Delhi elections, to be held on the 4 th of December, present one such unique opportunity. This is not merely an opportunity to change the party in power in Delhi, this is a moment to transform the politics of India. The possibility of Swaraj is knocking at doors of Delhi. If this electoral battle is won in Delhi, it would open the whole country to the winds of change. You hold the key to the future of this country... The announcement of elections is accompanied by the rituals that have come to define today’s electoral politics. Ruling parties make untruthful and exaggerated claims. Election manifestoes are released, which are a collection of false promises; both the readers and the writers of these documents are aware of the untruthfulness and the insignificance of these promises. In these elections, there is not one, but two ruling parties. While Congress has been holding the reins of the Delhi government for 15 years, BJP has been in power in the MCD for the past 7 years. Both parties are hand-in-glove and share the fruits of power. The result lies before you/ The Aam Aadmi Party is not just another party. It is a party that has arisen from the struggles of Ramlila Maidan and Jantar Mantar. It is a party that is not here merely to fight elections, it is here to change the rules of the game.
    [Show full text]
  • Nationalism and Democracy in India
    Nationalism and Democracy in India K R Narayanan The strength and balance of a nationalist movement can be determined by the degree to which its economic and social aspects have been joined on to the political aspect. The moment a nationalist movement gets divorced from necessary social and economic reform it loses its vitality as well as its hold on the people and gives place, almost inexorably, to a more revolutionary movement. Kuomintang China is the classic example of such a development. In India, as in most other countries of Asia and Africa, nationalism has thus to be understood in the sense of a constructive and liberating force. It is also a comprehensive concept transcending the boundaries of ordinary political usage in the West. ATIONALISM is the background pect in Europe, the British in their colo­ mind, but the manifestation of con N against which the drama of demo­ nial empire, the Russians in Yugoslavia, crete forces and palpable psychological cratic development has been unfolding Poland and Hungary, and the Chinese attitudes in society. This was largely itself in India since Independence. in Tibet. Indeed, many a battle of due to the peaceful and rational ap­ Every aspect of development—social, human liberty was fought under the proach of the leaders themselves who economic, political and cultural—is in­ nationalist banner, and even today over were constantly, even in the thick of formed by the spirit of nationalism, and vast areas of the globe nationalism the fray, examining and explaining the moved by its emotional impetus. For a spells freedom and dignity for man.
    [Show full text]
  • Push Button Parliament–Why India Needs a Non-Partisan, Recorded Vote System
    163 Push button parliament–why India needs a non-partisan, recorded vote system Fecha de recepción: 06 de septiembre de 2009 Fecha de aceptación: 16 de junio de 2010 Shalaka Patil* Abstract: Decisions of national importance are made by Parliamentary voting. Yet Indian Members of Parliament (MPs) vote with a remarkable lack of freedom and accountability. The introduction of the Tenth Schedule in the Constitution has crippled free expression, since it provides that MPs voting against ‘any direction’ of their Party are liable to disqualification from the le- gislature. In addition, except for Constitutional amendments, Indian Parlia- mentary Procedure Rules do not require votes of MPs to be recorded unless the Speaker’s decision is contested in the House. The result is that voting in the House has become mechanical, controlled by Party politics and devoid of responsibility. This paper comments on a general theory of democratic accountability through the lens of Parliamentary voting. It suggests that the voting system adopted in the Parliament is an effective indicator to measure the level of accountability of its Members. In the context of India, this paper argues that the level of accountability will increase to a desirable extent only when there is adoption of a recorded system for every important House * SMs. Shalaka Patil graduated with a Bachelors in Law degree in 2009 from Government Law College, Mumbai, India. Thereafter she worked in dispute resolution in a leading law firm in Mumbai. Shalaka completed her master’s degree in law from Harvard Law School with a focus on dispute resolution and public law in 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Parties and Patronage: a Comparative Analysis of the Indian Case
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Political Science Faculty Publications Department of Political Science 8-31-2006 Parties and Patronage: A Comparative Analysis of the Indian Case Charles Robert Hankla Georgia State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/political_science_facpub Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Hankla, Charles Robert, "Parties and Patronage: A Comparative Analysis of the Indian Case" (2006). Political Science Faculty Publications. 1. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/political_science_facpub/1 This Presentation is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Political Science at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Political Science Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Parties and Patronage: A Comparative Analysis of the Indian Case Charles R. Hankla Assistant Professor Department of Political Science Georgia State University PO Box 4069 Atlanta, Georgia 30302-4069 [email protected] Phone: 404-651-4839 Fax: 404-651-1434 Paper prepared for presentation at the annual convention of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, August 31 – September 2, 2006. 1 Abstract What political factors influence the allocation of economic patronage in democracies? Answering this question is vital to improving our knowledge of how states and markets interact. In this paper, I argue that changing levels of party centralization can drive important changes in the allocation of state largess. When governing parties are centralized, national party leaders will control sources of patronage, targeting benefits to particularly influential regions and industries.
    [Show full text]