Research Terms of Reference IDP Mass Communications and Movement Intentions of IDP households in Northern Research Cycle ID: IRQ1802 Iraq

April 2018 V1

1. Executive Summary

Country of intervention Iraq

Type of Emergency □ Natural disaster X Conflict

Type of Crisis □ Sudden onset □ Slow onset X Protracted

Mandating Body/ Agency OFDA

Project Code 10CZT

Research Timeframe 1. Start data collection: 21/04/2018 4. Data sent for validation: 03/07/2018

Add planned deadlines (for 2. Data collected: 16/05/2018 5. Outputs sent for validation: 03/08/2018 first cycle if more than 1) 3. Data analysed: 17/06/2018 6. Outputs published: 17/08/2018

Number of assessments □ Single assessment (one cycle) X Multi assessment (more than one cycle)

Humanitarian milestones Milestone Deadline Specify what will the assessment inform and when □ Donor plan/strategy _ _/_ _/_ _ _ _ e.g. The shelter cluster will use this data to draft its X Inter-cluster plan/strategy: Ongoing Revised Flash Appeal; - Returns Working Group X Cluster plan/strategy: Ongoing - CCCM cluster - Protection cluster

□ NGO platform plan/strategy _ _/_ _/_ _ _ _

□ Other (Specify): _ _/_ _/_ _ _ _

Audience type Dissemination

www.reach-initiative.org 1

IDP Mass Communications, April 2018

Audience Type & □ Strategic X General Product Mailing (e.g. mail to NGO consortium; HCT participants; Donors) Dissemination Specify X Programmatic who will the assessment X Cluster Mailing (Education, Shelter and WASH) X Operational inform and how you will and presentation of findings at next cluster disseminate to inform the □ Other (specify): meeting audience X Presentation of findings (e.g. at HCT meeting; Cluster meeting) X Website Dissemination (Relief Web & REACH Resource Centre)

Detailed dissemination □ Yes X No plan required

M&E Matrix required X Yes □ No

General Objective To provide insight on how IDP households inform their movement intentions: specifically, how IDP households access and consume information, and to what extent information access / consumption plays a role in household decision-making with regards to movement and return. This assessment aims to inform effective programming and service delivery of humanitarian and government actors related to returns and secondary / continued displacement.

Specific Objective(s) Mass Communications Assessment: 1. Identify the ways in which IDP households, both in and out of camps, inform their decision to relocate. a. I. Primary sources b. II. Primary channels 2. Identify the communication barriers faced by households. In accessing information necessary to inform movement decisions, whether this relates to channels (access and use of devices, credit, mobile data) or sources (frequency of availability, language). 3. Identify the extent to which Information sources are trusted and perceived as credible by IDPs a. Most trusted sources b. Least trusted sources 4. Identify the extent to which returns related information and information about the area of origin (AoO) that IDPs get informs their movement intentions. Intentions Assessment: 1. Identify the proportion of out-of-camp IDPs who intend to return, relocate and remain in place in the coming months. 2. Identify potential timing, scale and geographical destinations of movements. 3. Identify needs and vulnerabilities that may influence movement intentions or be exacerbated by choices of return, relocate or settle in place.

Research Questions Mass Communications Assessment: 1. What types of movements-related information (i.e. what topics) are IDP households currently receiving? From which source and by which channel? 2. What information access barriers do IDP households face?

www.reach-initiative.org 2

IDP Mass Communications, April 2018

3. To what extent are the information sources perceived as trusted and credible by IDPs? 4. To what extent does the returns-related information that IDPs receive influence movement intentions? Intentions Assessment: 1. What proportion of IDPs (out of camp) are intending to return to their areas of origin within the next three months? 2. What are the barriers to return for IDP households not intending to return? 3. What are the movement plans (timeframe and destination) for households with different intentions (intending to return to their AoO, to move to another location, to remain in place)?

Geographic Coverage Northern Iraq: Ninewa, Dohuk, , , and Governorates

Secondary data sources ● CCCM Cluster data on IDP camp population figures ● IOM DTM data ● REACH Quarterly IDP Camp Directory ● REACH In-Camp Intentions Survey Data

Population(s) X IDPs in camp X IDPs in informal sites

Select all that apply X IDPs in host communities □ IDPs Other (Specify):

□ Refugees in camp □ Refugees in informal sites

□ Refugees in host communities □ Refugees Other (Specify):

□ Host communities □ Other (Specify):

Stratification X Geographical #:5 X Group #: 2 □ [Other Specify] #: _ _ Select type(s) and enter Population size per Population size per Population size per number of strata strata is known? strata is known? strata is known? X Yes □ No X Yes □ No □ Yes □ No

Data collection tool(s) X Structured (Quantitative) X Semi-structured (Qualitative)

Sampling method Data collection method

Structured data □ Purposive X Key informant interview (Target #):_ _ _ _ _ collection tool # 1 □ Probability / Simple random X Group discussion (Target #):_ 10 out of camp, Select sampling and data collection method and specify x Probability / Stratified simple random 10 in camp _ _ _ target # interviews x Probability / Cluster sampling X Household interview (Target #):_1260 out of □ Probability / Stratified cluster sampling camp, 1808 in camp_ □ [Other specify] □ Individual interview (Target #):_ _ _ _ _ □ Direct observations (Target #):_ _ _ _ _ □ [Other specify] (Target #):_ _ _ _ _

Target level of precision 95% level of confidence 7.5+/- % margin of error at governorate-level if probability sampling

www.reach-initiative.org 3

IDP Mass Communications, April 2018

Data management X IMPACT □ UNHCR platform(s)

□ [Other (Specify)]:

Expected output type(s) □ Situation overview #: _ _ X Report #: 1 □ Profile #: _ _

X Presentation (Preliminary □ Presentation (Final) X Factsheet #: 10 (5 for findings) #: 2 #: _ _ Mass Comms, 5 for intentions)

□ Interactive dashboard □ Web map #: _ _ □ Map #: _ _ #:_

□ [Other Specify] #: _ _

Access X Public (available on REACH resource centre and other humanitarian platforms)

□ Restricted (bilateral dissemination only upon agreed dissemination list, no publication on REACH or other platforms)

Visibility Specify which REACH, CCCM, Protection, Returns Working Group logos should be on outputs

2. Background/Rationale 2018 is likely to see an increasing rate of returns of internally displaced populations in Iraq to their areas of origin. However, humanitarian actors are not anticipating these returns to occur uniformly across all displaced groups, highlighting the need to further explore barriers to returning as well as requisite conditions for safe and voluntary returns. The Iraq 2018 Humanitarian Response Plan specifically underlined the need for providing information to IDPs on services and conditions in return areas.1 A recent report by DRC, IRC and NRC highlighted that a lack of reliable and up to date information about conditions in areas of origin can result in premature returns and suggests that IDPs lack information that is provided through official channels.2 Preliminary results from the recent REACH/CCCM intentions survey with in-camp IDPs shows that perceptions on a wide range of topics – from security in areas of origin to livelihood opportunities – correlated to different patterns in movement intentions. However, substantive data related to the primary ways in which IDPs access and consume movement-related information which affects these perceptions is currently lacking, such as information on security, services, assistance, rights, and entitlements, and how IDPs use this information to make decisions about their movement. To address this information gap, REACH proposes to conduct an assessment on IDP mass communications through a household survey and focus group discussions. The assessment will also incorporate a new round of the Intentions Survey to capture movement intentions of out-of-camp IDPs. While both assessments will be addressed by the same survey, this project should be considered a multi assessment cycle, and the Intentions Survey will have a distinct analysis and output production phase. 3. Methodology 3.1. Methodology overview The assessment will employ a head of household survey representative of the target population at governorate level, supplemented by a series of focus group discussions to contextualize and nuance the quantitative data.

1 https://data2.unhcr.org/en/documents/download/62295 2 https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/thelongroadhomefinal28022018.pdf

www.reach-initiative.org 4

IDP Mass Communications, April 2018

This assessment will begin with a secondary data review and consultations with key partners, specifically CCCM and Protection clusters and the Returns Working Group, to shape the survey. First phase data collection will consist of a household survey of both in-camp and out of camp IDPs conducted by trained enumerators after an initial pilot and adjustment of the survey. Data will be cleaned daily during the survey implementation. After an initial review of findings from the survey data, the second phase of data collection will use focus groups to clarify, elaborate and triangulate information.

Relevant definitions: ● “Movement-related information” refers to information that may have a strong influence on an IDP household’s movement intentions. For example, this could be information about the security situation, availability of humanitarian assistance, access to services, conditions of a home in an area of origin, conditions in another camp, movement restrictions, legal rights, and livelihood opportunities. ● “In-camp” refers to IDPs living in planned camps. ● “Out of camp” refer to all IDPs not living in planned camps, transit centres or emergency sites. ● “Household” and Head of household”:

A household is a group of people who normally live and eat their meals together. Members must acknowledge the authority of one person as head of household and that person must actually live with the rest of the household members. In polygamous households, each wife is treated as a distinct household when the wives live in different houses, cook separately and take decisions independently.

3.2. Population of interest This assessment will cover the five northernmost : , Erbil, Kirkuk, Ninewa and Sulaymaniyah. Of the 2.3 million IDPs within Iraq as of February 2018, over 1.6 million (71%) reside in these governorates. Some districts within these governorates have been omitted due to security concerns.3

The population to be assessed includes both in-camp IDPs as well as out of camp IDPs. The Intentions survey portion only targets out of camp IDPs, as the National IDP Camp Intentions Survey (Round II, January 2018) captured this population recently. The main unit of analysis for the quantitative assessment will be households due to a need to understand the extent that communication patterns influence household movement intentions.

3.3. Secondary data review This assessment will make use of data from IOM-DTM, CCCM Cluster Iraq and REACH Quarterly Camp Directory to provide data on numbers and locations of IDPs both in-camp and out of camp. In addition, this assessment will draw on information from previous assessments, including the following. ● REACH and CCCM Iraq’s forthcoming Intentions Survey Report, Tools and Dataset. ● Understanding the Information and Communication Needs among IDPs in Northern Iraq” Interagency Rapid Assessment Report from August 2014. ● “Mass Communication Assessment of Syrian Refugees Inside Camps in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq,” REACH 2014. ● IOM’s “Integrated Location Assessment II” from October 2017 and DRC, IRC and NRC’s collaborative assessment “The Long Road Home” from February 2018 aid understanding of the context of IDPs and Returnees.

3 In Kirkuk: Hawiga district is excluded, in Ninewa: Baaj and .

www.reach-initiative.org 5

IDP Mass Communications, April 2018

3.4. Primary Data Collection First Phase: Quantitative household survey Sampling: ● Out of Camp IDPs: Multi stage sampling, where the first stage consists of a cluster sample of DTM locations, and the second stage consists of randomly selecting households at the DTM location level. Preliminary calls to mukhtars will verify the DTM information regarding the number of families. The cluster sample draws a buffer of locations in the event that DTM locations are not verified by the muktar to be hosting IDPs (Annex 2). The second stage may make use of different methods in different locations; where a list is available from the Mukhtar, this will be used to randomly select the number of households per location required by the cluster sample. Where this is not possible, a set of random geo-points will be generated per location, points from which the enumerator will interview the nearest IDP family. ● For out of camp IDPs, a cluster sample will be taken using the following app: https://oliviercecchi.shinyapps.io/R_sampling_tool ● Following simulations of cluster sizes between 2 and 10, cluster size 6 was found to be the most appropriate to keep the sample size and number of target locations achievable at a 7.5% margin of error. ● Where lists of IDP households in a location can be obtained from local community leaders, respondents will be randomly selected from lists. Where phone numbers can be obtained, enumerators will call the head of household ahead of time to arrange the timing and meeting place for interviews in advance, to mitigate logistical setbacks. ● In-camp IDPs: a simple random sample of all households in camp per governorate will be taken, representative with 95% confidence interval and 7.5% margin of error at governorate level. Aggregated to population level (in camp IDPs in Northern Iraq) this will be representative with a 95% confidence interval and a 3.9% margin of error. ● Tools: Survey questionnaire based on previous REACH communications assessments in Iraq (2014), Syria (2015) and Jordan (2017). It will incorporate lessons learned from the recent intentions survey which included limited communication-related questions. ● Sample Size Table:

In Camp Out of Camp Families Sample Families Sample Dahuk 25214 170 16212 264 Erbil 3480 163 17057 252 Sulaymaniyah 3719 163 5452 228 Kirkuk 4400 164 12787 282 Ninewa 51816 170 19497 234 Total 88629 830 71005 1260 Table 1: Household Survey Sample Size

Second Phase: Qualitative Focus Group Discussions Sampling: • The focus groups will be stratified by population group (in and out of camps), by gender and by governorate. One focus group per category will be conducted per governorate, as follows:

Dahuk Erbil Sulaymaniyah Kirkuk Ninewa Total Out Camp Out Camp Out Camp Out Camp Out Camp Male 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 Female 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 Total 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 20 Table 2: Focus Group Discussions Sample Size

www.reach-initiative.org 6

IDP Mass Communications, April 2018

Tools: The question route for the focus group discussions will be developed following initial findings of the household survey and to dig deeper on topics not well covered by quantitative research, such as rumours regarding the returns process, and particularly internet sources used by different groups.

3.5. Data Processing & Analysis

• AO will conduct data cleaning on a daily basis, and time permitting will train enumerators how to do initial data cleangin and spot checks. • AO will conduct data analysis. • For details on the data analysis process see the Data Analysis Plan in Annex 1. 4. Roles and responsibilities Table 2: Description of roles and responsibilities

Task Description Responsible Accountable Consulted Informed

Assessment Manager / HQ, Returns Working Returns Working Group, Protection Research design Assessment Officer Assessment Officer Group, Protection Cluster and CCCM Cluster and CCCM Cluster Cluster

Research Design – Assessment Officer, Household rosters of CCCM Cluster CCCM Cluster Assessment camps Manager

Data collection – field Field Coordinator Assessment Officer coordination

Assessment Officer, Data collection – Access to CCCM Cluster CCCM Cluster Assessment camps Manager

Data processing Field Coordinator, Assessment Officer HQ (checking, cleaning) Assessment Officer

Assessment Manager / HQ, Returns Working Data analysis Assessment Officer Assessment Officer Group, Protection Cluster and CCCM Cluster

Mapping NA NA NA NA

www.reach-initiative.org 7

IDP Mass Communications, April 2018

Returns Working Assessment Group, Protection Output production Assessment Officer Assessment Officer Manager, Country Cluster and CCCM Coordinator Cluster

Assessment Dissemination Assessment Officer Assessment Officer Manager

Monitoring & Evaluation Assessment Officer Assessment Officer HQ

Assessment Lessons learned Assessment Officer Assessment Officer HQ Manager

Responsible: the person(s) who executes the task Accountable: the person who validates the completion of the task and is accountable of the final output or milestone Consulted: the person(s) who must be consulted when the task is implemented Informed: the person(s) who need to be informed when the task is completed

5. Data Management Plan

Administrative Data

Research Cycle name IDP Mass Communications and Movement Intentions of IDP households in Northern Iraq

Project Code 10CZT

Donor OFDA

Project partners Returns Working Group

Research Contacts Kenneth MACFADYEN, [email protected]

Data Management Plan Date: 08/04/2018 Version: 1 Version

Related Policies Returns Working Group Information Management (IM) strategy ● Due to protection-related concerns, certain indicators related to movement intentions and restrictions will be removed from the dataset prior to publication

Documentation and Metadata

What documentation X Data analysis plan X Data Cleaning Log, including: and metadata will X Deletion Log accompany the data? X Value Change Log

www.reach-initiative.org 8

IDP Mass Communications, April 2018

Select all that apply □ Code book □ Data Dictionary

X Metadata based on HDX □ Other [specify] Standards

Ethics and Legal Compliance

Which ethical and legal X Consent of participants to participate □ Consent of participants to share personal measures will be taken? information with other agencies

□ No collection of personally identifiable X Gender, child protection and other data will take place protection issues are taken into account

X All participants reached age of Other [please specify] majority

Who will own the The data will be owned by REACH, but the data will be shared with relevant copyright and humanitarian stakeholders. Intellectual Property Rights for the data that is collected?

Storage and Backup

Where will data be X IMPACT/REACH Kobo Server □ Other Kobo Server: [specify] stored and backed up during the research? □ IMPACT Global Physical / Cloud X Country/Internal Server Server

X On devices held by REACH staff □ Physical location [specify]

□ Other [specify]

Which data access and X Password protection on X Data access is limited to REACH security measures have devices/servers Staff been taken? X Form and data encryption on data collection server

□ Other [specify]

Preservation

Where will data be X IMPACT / REACH Global Cloud X OCHA HDX stored for long-term / Physical Server preservation? □ REACH Country Server □ Other [specify]

Data Sharing

Will the data be shared □ Yes □ No, only with mandating agency / publicly? body www.reach-initiative.org 9

IDP Mass Communications, April 2018

Will all data be shared? □ Yes X No, only anonymized/ cleaned/ consolidated data will be shared

□ No, other [specify]

Where will you share the X REACH Resource Centre X OCHA HDX data?

□ HumanitarianResponse □ Other [specify]

Responsibilities

Data collection Kenneth MACFADYEN, [email protected]

Data cleaning Kenneth MACFADYEN, [email protected]

Data analysis Kenneth MACFADYEN, [email protected]

Data sharing/uploading Kenneth MACFADYEN, [email protected]

6. Data Analysis Plan See Annex 2: Data Analysis Plan

7. Monitoring & Evaluation Plan

IMPACT External M&E Focal Internal M&E Indicator Tool M&E Plan Objective Indicator point

Number of humanitarian organisations accessing IMPACT services/products # of downloads of x product from Resource Country request X Yes □ No Centre to HQ Number of individuals accessing IMPACT services/products

# of downloads of x product from Relief Country request X Yes □ No Web to HQ Humanitarian stakeholders are # of downloads of x product from Country Country team User_log □ Yes X No accessing IMPACT level platforms products

# of page clicks on x product from REACH Country request □ Yes X No global newsletter to HQ

# of page clicks on x product from country Country team X Yes □ No newsletter, SendinBlue, bit.ly

Country request # of visits to x webmap/x dashboard □ Yes X No to HQ

www.reach-initiative.org 10

IDP Mass Communications, April 2018

IMPACT activities Number of humanitarian # references in HPC documents (HNO, Referenc contribute to better organisations utilizing SRP, Flash appeals, Cluster/sector e_log Iraq HNO 2019 program IMPACT services/products strategies)

implementation and Country team RWG planning coordination of the documents humanitarian # references in single agency documents response

Humanitarian actors use IMPACT evidence/products as a basis for decision making, Usage_F aid planning and delivery eedback Perceived relevance of IMPACT country- and Usage_Feedback Number of humanitarian programs Usage_S documents (HNO, HRP, urvey cluster/agency strategic template plans, etc.) directly informed by IMPACT products

Perceived usefulness and influence of

IMPACT outputs Humanitarian stakeholders are Recommendations to strengthen IMPACT Country team using IMPACT products programs

Perceived capacity of IMPACT staff

Perceived quality of outputs/programs

Recommendations to strengthen IMPACT

programs

Number and/or percentage of humanitarian organizations directly Engage contributing to IMPACT X Yes □ No ment_log programs (providing Humanitarian resources, participating to stakeholders are presentations, etc.) engaged in IMPACT Country team programs throughout the # of organisations/clusters inputting in X Yes □ No research cycle research design and joint analysis

# of organisations/clusters attending X Yes □ No briefings on findings;

www.reach-initiative.org 11

IDP Mass Communications, April 2018 Annex 1: Out of Camp sample frame of locations Governorate District Location Name Families Target Dahuk Amedi Mizi Village 55 6 Dahuk Dahuk Al Jamyah 120 6 Dahuk Dahuk Botan 100 6 Dahuk Dahuk Shakhke 200 6 Dahuk Dahuk Nazarke 420 6 Dahuk Dahuk Mazi 140 6 Dahuk Dahuk Baroshke 345 6 Dahuk Dahuk Zawita 71 6 Dahuk Dahuk Upper Malta 250 6 Dahuk Sumel New Zinya 457 6 Dahuk Sumel Domiz-Rozh 217 6 Dahuk Sumel Semel 1352 12 Dahuk Sumel Seje 559 12 Dahuk Sumel Basetki 306 6 Dahuk Sumel Avro City 1181 12 Dahuk Sumel Khanke Qadima 380 6 Dahuk Sumel Misereek 1640 36 Dahuk Sumel Shariya 4335 24 Dahuk Sumel Soriya 157 6 Dahuk Sumel Dolib 33 6 Dahuk Sumel Domiz-Halat 385 6 Dahuk Rkawa Sector 220 6 Dahuk Zakho Bedar Sector 1241 18 Dahuk Zakho Ashe Chami Sector 455 6 Dahuk Zakho Kochka Honari 1070 12 Dahuk Zakho Shabaniya Sector 972 6 Dahuk Zakho Abasiya Sector 1068 6 Erbil Erbil Shorsh(Salahaldin) 139 6 Erbil Erbil Ashty 2 750 6 Erbil Erbil Havalan 396 12 Erbil Erbil Dartu Nwee 315 6 Erbil Erbil Shahan city 720 6 Erbil Erbil Manara 170 6 Erbil Erbil Ganjan 320 6 Erbil Erbil Sebardan 405 6 Erbil Erbil Mustawfi 199 6 Erbil Erbil Shawes 510 18 Erbil Erbil Mamostayan 358 6 Erbil Erbil Runaki(Mantikawa) 321 6 Erbil Erbil Sana City 20 6 Erbil Erbil Daratu-Nishtiman 145 6 Erbil Erbil Khabat 3701 30 Erbil Erbil Runaki(Andazyaran) 186 6 Erbil Erbil Somar 80 12 www.reach-initiative.org 12

IDP Mass Communications, April 2018

Erbil Erbil Lana City 270 12 Erbil Erbil Runaki(Mufti) 254 6 Erbil Erbil Nawroz-Banslawa 1430 18 Erbil Erbil Mamzawa 1500 6 Erbil Erbil Chwarchra-Banslawa 1455 30 Erbil Erbil Zaiton Collective 1009 12 Erbil Erbil Bahrka center 515 6 Erbil Erbil Gazna 120 6 Erbil Erbil Qushtapa centre 1245 12 Erbil Erbil Zanko 938 18 Erbil Erbil Andazyaran 264 12 Erbil Erbil Rizgari 719 6 Erbil Erbil Kawa Collective 370 6 Erbil Koisnjaq Armota 19 6 Erbil Koisnjaq Gashteyari 18 6 Erbil Sabirawa 74 6 Erbil Soran Soran District 520 6 Kirkuk Dabes Hay Al Tanak 132 6 Kirkuk Laylan-Al Abadat village 174 12 Kirkuk Daquq Taza-Omer Bin Khattab 320 6 Kirkuk Daquq Khala Bazyani 125 6 Kirkuk Daquq Hay Ashti 251 6 Kirkuk Kirkuk Hay Al-Nedaa 303 6 Kirkuk Kirkuk Sayada village 66 6 Kirkuk Kirkuk Hay Al Nassir 560 6 Kirkuk Kirkuk Hay Al-Urooba 738 6 Kirkuk Kirkuk Al Taakhi 760 18 Kirkuk Kirkuk Hay Rasheed(Domiz) 720 24 Kirkuk Kirkuk Hay Al Sekak 695 12 Kirkuk Kirkuk Hay Adan 230 6 Kirkuk Kirkuk Hay Al-Askary 1 710 12 Kirkuk Kirkuk Hay Al Jamia-Mahalla 622 2515 36 Kirkuk Kirkuk Hay Musalla 420 6 Kirkuk Kirkuk Sekanyan 45 6 Kirkuk Kirkuk Al-Qadisssiya(Rabareen) first 575 12 Kirkuk Kirkuk Al-Sayada Complex 380 12 Kirkuk Kirkuk Rahim Awa 448 6 Kirkuk Kirkuk Hay Al-Zawraa 500 12 Kirkuk Kirkuk Hay Al-Nasir 2 600 6 Kirkuk Kirkuk Hay Ghurnata 324 12 Kirkuk Kirkuk Hay 1 Athar 150 6 Kirkuk Kirkuk Al Tadamon(Hawkari) 1200 12 Kirkuk Kirkuk Amal al shaabi 638 6 Kirkuk Kirkuk Al-Qadisssiya(Rabareen) seconad 665 18 Kirkuk Kirkuk Al Hurriyah 350 18 Kirkuk Kirkuk Hay Al-Askary 2 545 36

www.reach-initiative.org 13

IDP Mass Communications, April 2018

Ninewa Daratu 385 6 Ninewa Akre Kani Lan 26 6 Ninewa Akre Bardarash 1544 12 Ninewa Akre Roviya 678 6 Ninewa Akre Akre 1633 6 Ninewa Al-Shikhan 848 6 Ninewa Al-Shikhan Pirbob 17 6 Ninewa Al-Shikhan Kalakchi 715 6 Ninewa Al-Shikhan Mahad 199 6 Ninewa Al-Shikhan Qasrok 553 6 Ninewa Zanjili 150 6 Ninewa Mosul Muwali 11 6 Ninewa Mosul Al-Nahda 635 6 Ninewa Mosul Al-Amil 1180 12 Ninewa Mosul HAY-FALISTINE 1442 12 Ninewa Mosul Karaj-Alshimal 1544 6 Ninewa Mosul Alshuhadaa 200 6 Ninewa Mosul Al-Shaymaa 650 6 Ninewa Mosul Al-Quds 1022 6 Ninewa Mosul Hay Adan 347 6 Ninewa Mosul Al rasheediya 1755 12 Ninewa Mosul Al-Noor 1587 6 Ninewa Mosul Al-Wahda 1217 6 Ninewa Mosul Bab Nergal 700 6 Ninewa Mosul Hay Al Intisar 1679 12 Ninewa Mosul Hay alsedeeq 177 6 Ninewa Mosul Hay Al Samah 600 6 Ninewa Mosul Al-Andalus 923 6 Ninewa Mosul Mosul Jadida 596 6 Ninewa Mosul Al-Moalemen 351 6 Ninewa Mosul HAY-SUMMER 1107 12 Ninewa Hay Alshuhada 264 6 Ninewa Sinjar Khana sor 450 6 Ninewa Telafar abu khushub 21 6 Ninewa Telafar Al Muthalatha village 300 6 Ninewa Telafar Tal wardan vilage 41 6 Ninewa Telafar Hay Al Askari 350 6 Ninewa Tilkaif Al Qawsiyat 1875 18 Ninewa Tilkaif 140 6 Sulaymaniyah Hazar kani 13 6 Sulaymaniyah Chamchamal Ashti 89 6 Sulaymaniyah Chamchamal Azady 252 6 Sulaymaniyah Chamchamal MOFARIAKAN 170 6 Sulaymaniyah Sara 69 6 Sulaymaniyah Dokan Qamchugha 85 6 Sulaymaniyah Dokan Sharawany 109 6

www.reach-initiative.org 14

IDP Mass Communications, April 2018

Sulaymaniyah Dokan Chawa spy 62 6 Sulaymaniyah Dokan Surdash 16 6 Sulaymaniyah Shikhan 53 6 Sulaymaniyah Kalar Khornawazan 250 12 Sulaymaniyah Kalar Raparin 149 6 Sulaymaniyah Kalar Hamrin 270 6 Sulaymaniyah Kalar Sharawani 200 6 Sulaymaniyah Kalar Khabat 84 6 Sulaymaniyah Kalar Shaykh Lankar 223 6 Sulaymaniyah Kalar Sangaw 270 6 Sulaymaniyah Kalar Zhalla 259 6 Sulaymaniyah Kalar Sirwan 130 6 Sulaymaniyah Rania Qula 14 6 Sulaymaniyah Sulaymaniya Wluba 326 156 6 Sulaymaniyah Sulaymaniya Kurd city 236 6 Sulaymaniyah Sulaymaniya Raparin-Bawa Mrda 61 6 Sulaymaniyah Sulaymaniya Bakhtiary 111 70 12 Sulaymaniyah Sulaymaniya Tasluja 521 6 Sulaymaniyah Sulaymaniya Bazian-peshwa 90 6 Sulaymaniyah Sulaymaniya Malik mahmood 401 228 12 Sulaymaniyah Sulaymaniya Khabat 306+304 111 6 Sulaymaniyah Sulaymaniya Awbara 207 6 Sulaymaniyah Sulaymaniya Besarani 122 30 6 Sulaymaniyah Sulaymaniya Saib City 224 6 Sulaymaniyah Sulaymaniya Azadi 116 6 Sulaymaniyah Sulaymaniya Dullani Khwaro 6 6 Sulaymaniyah Sulaymaniya Grdi Sarchnar 127 6 Sulaymaniyah Sulaymaniya Bakrajo-Qularaese Taza 131 6 Sulaymaniyah Sulaymaniya Kanakawa 167 6 Sulaymaniyah Sulaymaniya Gundy Almany 61 6 Sulaymaniyah Sulaymaniya Guezhay Kun 66 6 Sulaymaniyah Sulaymaniya Haware Shar 132 6

www.reach-initiative.org 15

IDP Mass Communications, April 2018

Annex 2: Data Analysis Plan

Indicator / Variable Questionnaire Question Instructions Questionnaire Responses Research IN # questions

12 Respondent age What is your age? Enter number Integer

What proportion of 13 HoH gender What is the gender of the head of household? Select one Male; Female IDPs (out of camp) are intending to 14 HH area of origin What governorate in Iraq were you / Head of Select one Erbil; Sulaymaniyah; Dahuk; Diyala; Salah al- return to their (governorate) Household living in before your displacement (forced Din; Ninewa; Anbar; Basrah; Qadissiya; areas of origin to leave your home)? Muthanna; ; Babylon; Baghdad; Thi- within the next Qar; Kerbala; Kirkuk; Missan; Wassit three months? 15 HH area of origin (district) What district in Iraq were you living in before your Select one List of Districts displacement?

16 HH area of origin (sub- What sub-district in Iraq were you living in before your Select one List of sub-districts (if same as current area district) displacement? of origin, end interview)

17 Time since first When were you / the Head of Household first Date (month/year) Date (month/year) displacement displaced?

18 Time/date of IDPs arrival in When did you arrive to this current location? Date (month/year) Date (month/year) current area of displacement

19 Secondary displacement Is this the first place you came to after being displaced Select one Yes; No; Do not wish to answer (forced to leave your home)?

www.reach-initiative.org 16

IDP Mass Communications, April 2018

20 Movement intentions: What are your (Head of Household) current movement Select one 1. Remain in current location. What % of HH who plan to return intentions for the next three months? 2. Return to area of origin. proportion of to AoO within 3 months 3. Move to another location - inside Iraq. IDPs (out of % of HH who plan to 4. Move to another location - outside Iraq. camp) are relocate to a non-AoO 5. Waiting to make a decision. intending to location 6. Other. return to their % of HH who plan to remain areas of origin in their current location within the next three months? 21 % of IDP households with About which topics did soemone in your household Select all that apply Safety and security; access to information about receive information related to your area of origin in the Satus of housing; the situation in the area of last 30 days? livelihoods, origin per topic in the past water services, 30 days electricity services, education; What types of healthcare; movements- humanitarian assistance; related Information about SGBV; information Access to propoerty compensation; (i.e. what Replacing or renewing official topics) are IDP documentation; households explosive hazard contamination; currently Procedures of movement (security clearance receiving? and authorization); From which Routes of Return; source and by Transportation; which Exiting Camps; channel? Intgration in community in place of displacement; reintegration in area of origin; government registration as an IDP; Vetting (to register as an IDP); Vetting (to exit a camp or area of displacement); 'Did no receive information'; 'Other topics (specify)';

www.reach-initiative.org 17

IDP Mass Communications, April 2018

22 TOPICS, repeat for each From what source did your household generally receive SOURCES: Friends and Family living in the topic selected information about [TOPIC] in the past 30 days? area of origin; Friends and Family that visited the area of origin in the past 30 days; Friends and Family that have not been in the area of origin in the past 30 days; Local authorities; National authority; NGO/humanitarian agencies; Religious Leaders; Mukhtar; Sector leaders; Schools, Community centres; Other (please specify); None 23 TOPICS, repeat for each Through what means did your household receive CHANNELS: Direct Observation; Face-to- topic selected information related to [TOPIC] in the past 30 days? face communication (e.g. from friends); Television; Telephone/mobile phone (Voice Call); Mobile Phone (text SMS); Facebook (app); Facebook (messenger); Skype: Viber; Whatsapp; Instagram; Twitter; Notice Board and Poster; Newspapers or Magazines; Printed Leaflet; Loud speakers; Radio; Other (specify); None 70 % of households receiving Did your household in the last 30 days receive any Select one Yes; No; Don't know; Do not wish to answer information related to returns information related to returns from humanitarian from humanitarian organisations? organisations 71 Topics of information What topics did your household receive information on Select all that apply TOPICS received from humanitarian from humanitarian organisations? organisations

72 % of households receiving Did your household in the last 30 days receive any Yes; No; Don't know; Do not wish to answer information related to returns information related to returns from local/national from local/national authorities? authorities 73 Topics of information What topics did your household receive information on Select all that apply TOPICS received from local/national from local/national authorities? authorities

www.reach-initiative.org 18

IDP Mass Communications, April 2018

74 Topics about which About any topics does your household wants to get Select all that apply TOPICS households would like to more information? receive more information

75 % of households with Which of the following devices does someone in your DEVICES: TV; Radio; Laptop computer; access to different devices household own? Computer; Normal Phone; Smartphone- Android; Smartphone-iPhone; iPad Tablet; Other Tablet; None; Other (Specify)

% of IDP households with Does anyone in the household have internet access in Yes; No internet access your current location?

What information access 78 Top methods of accessing How does someone in your household access the Select one Home WiFi; Mobile Data; Portable Modem barriers do the internet internet in your current location? (primary, secondary, (e.g. Fastlink); Landline; Café; Institution IDP tertiary) (library, school); Neighbour; Do no access households internet; Other (specify) face? 79 % of IDP households with How frequent does someone in your household access Select one Daily; weekly; monthly; sporadic; Never frequent access to internet the internet?

80 Primary internet What is the most used internet communication channel Select one Viber; Whatsapp; Facebook; Messenger; communication channels that your household uses in the past 30 days? Skype; Twitter; None; Other (specify) used by households

81 Secondary internet What is the second most used internet communication Select one Viber; Whatsapp; Facebook; Messenger; communication channels channel that your household uses in the past 30 days? Skype; Twitter; No other; Other (specify) used by households

www.reach-initiative.org 19

IDP Mass Communications, April 2018

82 Tertiary internet What is the third most used internet communication Select one Viber; Whatsapp; Facebook; Messenger; communication channels channel that your household uses in the past 30 days? Skype; Twitter; No other; Other (specify) used by households

83 % households in an online Does someone in your household share / get Yes; No group for information sharing information through online groups in the past 30 days?

84 Prevalence of different types If yes, which kind of groups? Select all that apply Whatsapp; Viber; Facebook private group; of inforation sharing groups Facebook Page; Messenger Group; Other online (Specify)

87 % of households who are Is your household aware of Freebasics? Select one Yes; No; Don't know; Do not wish to answer aware of Freebasics

88 % of households who have Does anyone in your household have the Freebasics Select one Yes; No; Don't know; Do not wish to answer installed the Freebasics App App installed? for accessing the internet

89 Frequency of household use How often does someone in your household use Select one Every day; every week; every month; of Freebasics Freebasics in the past 30 days? sporadically; don't know how to use it

90 Top barriers to accessing What is the most important barrier your household Select one BARRIERS: Access to electricity; Access to information to inform faces to access information that you need to inform a TV; Access to a Radio: Access to a Phone: movement intentions your travel? Access to a smartphone; Access to a computer; Cell credit; Mobile Data; WiFi bill; Literacy; Technology Literacy; Website Blocked; language; None; Other (specify) 91 Top barriers to accessing What is the second most imporant barrier your Select one BARRIERS information to inform household faces to access information that you need to movement intentions inform your travel?

www.reach-initiative.org 20

IDP Mass Communications, April 2018

92 Top barriers to accessing What is the third most important barrier your household Select one BARRIERS information to inform faces to access information that you need to inform movement intentions your travel?

93 Top barriers to accessing What is the most important barrier your household Select one INTERNET_BARRIERS: No device at all; information on the internet faces to access information on the internet? Only one device for the household; Lack of network coverage; damaged/lost device; Cost of WiFi; Cost of device; Slow Internet Speed; Slow Device; Cost of Mobile Data; Technology literacy; Language; Literacy; Willingness to use Internet; Doesn't have internet; None; Other (Specify) 94 Top barriers to accessing What is the second most important barrier your Select one INTERNET_BARRIERS information on the internet household faces to access information on the internet?

95 Top barriers to accessing What is the third most important barrier your household Select one INTERNET_BARRIERS information on the internet faces to access information on the internet?

96 Barriers to device charging What difficulties does your household have when trying Select Multiple No electricity; distance to power socket; no to charge devices (like phones, tablets, laptops)? charger; cost of electricity; no barriers to phone charging; other (specify)

103 Most trustworthy information What is your household's most trusted information Select one SOURCES To what extent sources source for returns related information? are the information sources perceived as 104 Most trustworthy information What is your household's second most trusted Select one SOURCES trusted and sources information source for returns related information? credible by IDPs?

www.reach-initiative.org 21

IDP Mass Communications, April 2018

105 Most trustworthy information What is your household's third most trusted information Select one SOURCES sources source for returns related information?

106 Least trustworthy What is your household's least trusted information Select one SOURCES information sources source for returns related information?

107 Least trustworthy What is your household's second least trusted Select one SOURCES information sources information source for returns related information?

108 Least trustworthy What is your household's third least trusted information Select one SOURCES information sources source for returns related information?

109 % of households with Does someone in your household have privacy Select one Yes; No; Don't know; Do not wish to answer privacy concerns about concerns about using particular communication certain communication channels? channels 110 % of households with If yes, which communication channels? Select multiple CHANNELS privacy concerns about certain communication channels per source 111 % households triangulating Do you double check information about differnet Yes; No; Do not wish to answer their info topics? (Triangulate / cross check for accuracy).

112 Primary methods of cross If yes, how? Second opinion from another trusted source; checking Second and Third opinion from trusted sources; Direct observation; Other (specify)

www.reach-initiative.org 22

IDP Mass Communications, April 2018

113 % Households of which How important are the topics of information we Select one very important; important; somewhat movement intentions that discussed to your movement intentions / decision? important; somehow not important; are influenced by completely not important information received

To what extent 114 Reasons that information is If not important, why not? Personal Reasons (includes religious does the not important to the decision reasons, trauma, just not ready to go back returns-related etc); Not the Household’s decision to make information (e.g. will move as a community); Information that IDPs perceived as generally not trusted, receive inaccurate or outdated; Direct observation influence informs them instead of receiving movement information; Do not wish to answer; Other intentions? (Specify) 115 Information topics that Which topics of information have influenced your Select multiple TOPICS influence movement household's movement intentions? intentions decision

116 % of HH planning on If you had more accurate information about your Area Select one Yes; No; Don't know; Do not wish to answer returning who think more of Origin, do you think it would help your household accurate information would with planning to return? help their movement plans

www.reach-initiative.org 23