DOCSLIB.ORG

Technical Assessment of the Shuswap River Watershed

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Technical Assessment of the Shuswap River Watershed February 3, 2012 PHASE I - SHUSWAP RIVER WATERSHED SUSTAINABILITY PLAN Technical Assessment of the Shuswap River Watershed Submitted to: Laura Frank, Sustainability Coordinator Regional District of North Okanagan 9848 Aberdeen Road Coldstream, BC V1B 2K9 Report Number: 1114920047-002-R-Rev0 Distribution: REPORT Regional District of North Okanagan – 2 Bound Copies and 1 PDF Copy Golder Associates Ltd. - 1 Copy TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE SHUSWAP RIVER WATERSHED Executive Summary As requested by the Regional District of North Okanagan (RDNO), Golder Associates Ltd. (Golder) in collaboration with our sub-consultant Mr. Phil Epp, Consulting Hydrologist, is pleased to provide this Technical Assessment of the Shuswap River Watershed, mainly located in Electoral Areas “D” (Rural Lumby), “E” (Cherryville), and “F” (Rural Enderby) of the RDNO, in the Southern Interior of British Columbia. This Technical Assessment is part of Phase I of the larger Shuswap River Watershed Sustainability Plan (SRWSP), led by the RDNO, which involves an in-depth planning process with significant stakeholder and public engagement to establish a long-term vision for the management of the watershed, identify issues and data gaps, and develop objectives and actions for its future management. The purpose of this Technical Assessment is to establish a watershed profile for the Shuswap River Watershed, with a specific focus on its water quality, water quantity, and condition of riparian areas. This Technical Assessment was restricted to a desktop evaluation of the available information for the Shuswap River Watershed with baseline data and geographic information system mapping as the deliverables. The amount of information for this watershed is substantial. As such, and in consultation with the RDNO, primary efforts were focused on characterizing the water quality, water quantity, and condition of riparian areas associated with the main sub-drainages of this watershed. The Shuswap River Watershed is dominated by the Shuswap River and includes all of its direct and indirect sub- drainages. The Shuswap River originates from Joss Pass between Joss Mountain and Davis Peak in the Sawtooth Range of the Monashee Mountains. From its headwaters, the Shuswap River flows approximately 150 kilometres (km) down into the Shuswap Highlands and through two large lakes, Sugar Lake and Mabel Lake, before discharging into Mara Lake, which is a tributary lake of Shuswap Lake. The Shuswap River is commonly divided into the following three main sub-watersheds: the Upper Shuswap River Watershed (114,750 ha), which starts at Joss Pass and flows south, discharging into Sugar Lake (key sub-drainages: Greenbush Creek, Spectrum Creek, Outlet Creek); the Middle Shuswap River Watershed (292,403 ha), which starts at the Sugar Lake outlet and flows south and then north again into Mabel Lake (key sub-drainages: Cherry Creek, Ferry Creek, Duteau Creek, Bessette Creek, Wap Creek); and, the Lower Shuswap River Watershed (112,963 ha), which starts at the Mabel Lake outlet and flows to the west towards Enderby, eventually flowing north and discharging into Mara Lake (key sub-drainages: Kingfisher Creek, Trinity Creek, Fortune Creek). Each of these three identified sub-watersheds is characterized by unique biophysical and anthropogenic (i.e., human caused) regimes. As such, a separate profile has been developed for each sub-watershed as part of this Technical Assessment. The following sections provide a summary of the water quality, water quantity, and riparian areas results and discussion for the Shuswap River Watershed, with specific reference to each of the identified sub-watersheds. February 3, 2012 Report No. 1114920047-002-R-Rev0 TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE SHUSWAP RIVER WATERSHED Water Quality A high-level review of existing water quality data within the Shuswap River Watershed was undertaken as part of this Technical Assessment based on data presented in historical monitoring reports (academic, government, and consultant) concerning water usage, agriculture, industry, waste management, academic, and commercial stakeholders. These studies have predominantly focused on Mara Lake, Mabel Lake, Sugar Lake, Bessette Creek, Fortune Creek, and Brash Creek. Additional water quality data were obtained from BC Ministry of the Environment water wells in the Shuswap River Watershed, as well as from information warehoused in the RDNO’s WaterTrax online database. Water quality data for the Shuswap River Watershed were reviewed for broad trend and gap analysis, and were not subject to reinterpretation. As such, the water quality assessment in this Technical Assessment does not constitute a “source to tap” evaluation. Water quality comments are restricted largely to the following key parameters, where data were available: chloride and sodium (proxy for potential road salt impact; considered a conservative parameter for contaminant plume migration), nutrients (nitrate, nitrite, ammonia, ammonium, and phosphorous), and microbial parameters (E. coli and total coliforms). While the overall water quality of the Shuswap River Watershed is considered “good,” water quality impacts have been observed for nutrients and microbial parameters predominantly attributed to anthropogenic activities. Water quality in the Upper Shuswap River Watershed largely reflects nutrient and microbial impacts related to non- intensive agricultural and livestock activities as well as increased turbidity associated with high energy tributaries and freshet. Middle and Lower Shuswap River Watershed water quality data sets indicate an increasing impact to water resources from anthropogenic activities, largely consisting of elevated nutrients (waste management, septic disposal, agriculture, livestock). The limited nature of groundwater quality information prevents a detailed assessment of aquifer water quality. An extensive data mining and data warehousing program would greatly increase the amount of useful data available for interpretation and monitoring. Similarly, establishing a more comprehensive, consistent suite of analytical parameters and establishing a regular monitoring program for both surface water and groundwater at key locations across the Shuswap River Watershed would allow for the determination of representative background water quality and evaluation of short term and long term trends in water quality. A preliminary risk assessment was conducted for the Upper, Middle, and Lower Shuswap River Watershed based on land use designations, proximity to water sources, BC Contaminated Site Inventory Data, and data provided by the RDNO. This preliminary assessment identified potential areas of concern, largely related to intensive agriculture, waste management and wastewater treatment, and industry found within the Middle and Lower Shuswap River Watersheds. The Upper Shuswap River Watershed is considered to reflect a much lower risk to water quality due to the relatively minimal recreational, residential, and industrial infrastructure. Moderate and high risk rankings were given to land uses within the more densely populated areas within the Middle and Lower Shuswap River Watershed, such as those surrounding Lumby and Enderby, respectively. A limited “windshield” field program is recommended to confirm and revise the preliminary risk rankings. February 3, 2012 Report No. 1114920047-002-R-Rev0 TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE SHUSWAP RIVER WATERSHED Water Quantity: Surface Water The regional hydrology of the Shuswap River Watershed is influenced by the topographical and climatic characteristics of the area, which in turn determine annual runoff and surface water flows. The climate of this area is characterized by warm to hot summers and cold winters, with relatively dry conditions in the warmer valley bottoms of the Lower Shuswap River Watershed and much wetter and cooler conditions at higher elevations and particularly in the mountainous areas of the Upper Shuswap River Watershed. Freshet surface water flows in the Shuswap River begin in April with the melting of the lower elevation snowpack, increase in May as snowmelt moves to the higher elevations, then peak and start to decline in June with the completion of the melt. Flows decline rapidly in July and then diminish more slowly into fall and winter. January and February are generally the lowest flow months of the year. Tributary streams follow the same general flow pattern, although freshet peaks occur earlier in May in the lower elevation tributaries of the Middle and Lower Shuswap River Watershed. Annual surface runoff from the Upper Shuswap River exceeds 1000 mm/year, but diminishes to less than 200 mm/year in the lower elevations and drier conditions of the Lower Shuswap River. There are surface flow records for 34 Water Survey of Canada (WSC) hydrometric stations in the Shuswap River Watershed, which are used to characterize the annual, monthly, and daily flows of this area. The earliest flow records for the Shuswap River from the WSC station near Enderby date from 1911 so there is a long history of information available for this system. Unfortunately, considerable gaps exists in the hydrometric data available as only six of the stations are still active, only 14 have more than 10 years of flow records, there are no hydrometric stations upstream of the outlet of Sugar Lake, and there are no active stations in tributaries with unregulated flows. Re-establishment of several hydrometric stations on other tributaries with high water use (e.g., Fortune Creek) and several tributaries
Load more

Recommended publications
  • North Thompson Official Community Plan
    Schedule “A” to Bylaw 2700 North Thompson Official Community Plan Foreword and Acknowledgements The North Thompson Official Community Plan is the outcome of over two years of research, public participation and planning. The Regional District is grateful to all those residents and groups who provided interest, passion, and support from all corners of the Plan area culminating in the Plan development. In particular, we wish to recognize the following people for the exceptional amount of time and energy they dedicated to the planning process. OCP Advisory Committee Director Carol Schaffer, Electoral Area “A” Director Stephen Quinn, Electoral Area “B” Director Bill Kershaw, Electoral Area “O” Tom Eustache – Simpcw First Nation Rick Dee Harley Wright Willow Macdonald (past member) Meetings, Conversations and Information Providers Anna Kay Eldridge – Simpcw First Nation Ashley Dyck – Planning Services Celia Nord – Little Shuswap Indian Band Chris Ortner Dan Winiski Doris Laner – North Thompson Arts Council James Demens and Brandon Gustafsen – Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure Jenny Green and Clare Audet – Interior Health Authority Kelly Funk – Kelly Funk Photography Laura Ryser – Research Manager, Rural and Small Town Studies Program, UNBC Leanne Nystoruk Mike Scarff, TNRD GIS Services PIBC and the Planners from the local Interior Chapter Sarah Cooke and Mike Cloet – Ministry of Mines, Energy and Petroleum Resources Staff and students at Clearwater and Barriere Secondary Schools Staff from the Agricultural Land Commission Staff
    [Show full text]
  • Cat-Skiing & Snowmobiling, and All the Park Users and Stakeholders Who Willingly Shared Their Knowledge and Interest in the Park
    BACKGROUND OCUMENT D December 2004 for Pukeashun Provincial Park Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection Parks Division 1 2 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................................6 PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT HISTORY ..................................................................................................................6 PARK ESTABLISHMENT AND LEGISLATION ................................................................................................................6 MANAGEMENT DIRECTION FROM LAND USE PLANS..................................................................................................7 NATURAL VALUES ..................................................................................................................................................8 CLIMATE....................................................................................................................................................................8 PHYSIOGRAPHY .........................................................................................................................................................8 GEOLOGY AND SOILS.................................................................................................................................................8 WATER ......................................................................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Eocene Paleo-Physiography and Drainage Directions, Southern Interior Plateau, British Columbia1
    215 Eocene paleo-physiography and drainage directions, southern Interior Plateau, British Columbia1 Selina Tribe Abstract: A map of reconstructed Eocene physiography and drainage directions is presented for the southern Interior Plateau region, British Columbia south of 53°N. Eocene landforms are inferred from the distribution and depositional paleoenvironment of Eocene rocks and from crosscutting relationships between regional-scale geomorphology and bedrock geology of known age. Eocene drainage directions are inferred from physiography, relief, and base level elevations of the sub-Eocene unconformity and the documented distribution, provenance, and paleocurrents of early Cenozoic fluvial sediments. The Eocene landscape of the southern Interior Plateau resembled its modern counterpart, with highlands, plains, and deeply incised drainages, except regional drainage was to the north. An anabranching valley system trending west and northwest from Quesnel and Shuswap Highlands, across the Cariboo Plateau to the Fraser River valley, contained north-flowing streams from Eocene to early Quaternary time. Other valleys dating back at least to Middle Eocene time include the North Thompson valley south of Clearwater, Thompson valley from Kamloops to Spences Bridge, the valley containing Nicola Lake, Bridge River valley, and Okanagan Lake valley. During the early Cenozoic, highlands existed where the Coast Mountains are today. Southward drainage along the modern Fraser, Chilcotin, and Thompson River valleys was established after the Late Miocene. Résumé : Cet article présente une carte reconstituée de la géographie physique et des directions de drainage, à l’Éocène, pour la région du plateau intérieur de la Colombie-Britannique, au sud du 53e parallèle Nord. Les formes de terrain à l’Éocène sont déduites de la distribution et du paléoenvironnement de déposition des roches de l’Éocène et à partir de relations de recoupement entre la géomorphologie à l’échelle régionale et la géologie du socle, d’âge connu.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecosystems of British Columbia
    Special Report Series 6 ECOSYSTEMS OF BRITISH COLUMBIA FEBRUARY 1991 BC Ministry of Forests ISSN 0843-6452 Ecosystems of British Columbia Compiled and Edited by Del Meidinger 1 and Jim Pojar 2 1 Research Branch 2 Forest Sciences Section B.C. Ministry of Forests B.C. Ministry of Forests 31 Bastion Square Bag 5000 Victoria, B.C. V8W 3E7 Smithers, B.C. V0J 2N0 February 1991 BC Ministry of Forests Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Main entry under title: Ecosystems of British Columbia (Special report series, ISSN 0843-6452 ; no. 6) Includes bibliographical references: p. ISBN 0-7718-8997-6 1. Forest ecology - British Columbia. 2. Bio- climatology - British Columbia. 3. Biogeography - British Columbia. I. Meidinger, Dellis Vern, 1953- . II. Pojar, Jim, 1948- . III. British Columbia. Ministry of Forests. IV. Series: Special report series (British Columbia. Ministry of Forests) ; no. 6. QK938.F6.E26 1991 581.5'2642'09711 C91-092061-3 1991 Province of British Columbia Published by the Research Branch Ministry of Forests 31 Bastion Square Victoria, B.C. V8W 3E7 Copies of this and other Ministry of Forests titles are available from Crown Publications Inc., 546 Yates Street, Victoria, B.C. V8W 1K8. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Numerous individuals contributed to this report, including not only the authors of the separate sections (see ``List of Authors and Af®liations''), but also their associates who have helped over several years in the research on which the report is based. All the authors are or were employed in the B.C. Ministry of Forests research program or the B.C. Ministry of Environment Wildlife Branch.
    [Show full text]
  • A. Canadian Rocky Mountains Ecoregional Team
    CANADIAN ROCKY MOUNTAINS ECOREGIONAL ASSESSMENT Volume One: Report Version 2.0 (May 2004) British Columbia Conservation Data Centre CANADIAN ROCKY MOUNTAINS ECOREGIONAL ASSESSMENT • VOLUME 1 • REPORT i TABLE OF CONTENTS A. CANADIAN ROCKY MOUNTAINS ECOREGIONAL TEAM..................................... vii Canadian Rocky Mountains Ecoregional Assessment Core Team............................................... vii Coordination Team ....................................................................................................................... vii Canadian Rocky Mountains Assessment Contact........................................................................viii B. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS................................................................................................... ix C. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................... xi Description..................................................................................................................................... xi Land Ownership............................................................................................................................. xi Protected Status.............................................................................................................................. xi Biodiversity Status......................................................................................................................... xi Ecoregional Assessment ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Channels: Past, Present, and Future Land Use on the Salmon River Delta, British Columbia
    Changing Channels: Past, Present, and Future Land Use on the Salmon River Delta, British Columbia by Joshua Fontaine B.A. (Anthropology), University of British Columbia, Okanagan, 2008 Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Archaeology Faculty of Environment © Joshua Fontaine 2020 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Spring 2020 Copyright in this work rests with the author. Please ensure that any reproduction or re-use is done in accordance with the relevant national copyright legislation. Approval Name: Joshua Fontaine Degree: Master of Arts Title: Changing Channels: Past, Present, and Future Land Use on the Salmon River Delta, British Columbia Examining Committee: Chair: Rudy Reimer Associate Professor George Nicholas Senior Supervisor Professor Jonathan Driver Supervisor Professor Nola Markey Supervisor RPCA, Crane Heritage Research David Maxwell External Examiner Lecturer Date Defended/Approved: April 20, 2020 ii Ethics Statement iii Abstract This study examines how using multiple lines of evidence can help us understand the complex human-environment interactions that have occurred on the Salmon River delta in south-central British Columbia in the pre-contact, historic, and modern eras. Using a qualitative methodology, I examine archaeological, ethnographic and ethnohistoric, and environmental studies to evaluate how complementary these different sources of information are in studying this topic. I scrutinize the intersection of these approaches through four questions: 1) what do archaeology, ethnohistory, ethnographies, and traditional knowledge tell us about land use in the past?; 2) what can archaeology and environmental studies tell us about how the delta has been impacted by settlement activities (both Indigenous and settler)?; 3) what can ethnohistory, ethnographies, traditional knowledge, and environmental studies tell us about environmental impacts to the Salmon River delta?; and 4) how can a synthesis of these approaches help us understand the complex human-environment interactions?.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shuswap Hut-To-Hut Trail Circuit and Waterway Initiative;
    The Shuswap Hut-to-Hut Trail and Waterway Initiative Phase 1 Report Preliminary Concept Development November 20, 2006 DRAFT Prepared by: Phil McIntyre-Paul Project Research and Consultation Assistance by: Jeremy Ayotte, Graham Casselman, Ivan Casselman, Jim Maybee, Steven Patterson, and Lori Schneider Wood Consultation and Route Plotting: John Coffey Proponent Sponsor: Dave Andrews, Community Futures Development Corporation of the Shuswap With funding assistance from: Western Economic Diversification Canada and the Columbia Shuswap Regional District Area E Economic Opportunities Fund Shuswap Hut-to-Hut Trail Circuit and Waterways Initiative Phase 1 Concept Development – Updated: November 20, 2006 1 Prepared by: Phil McIntyre-Paul (250-804-1964/[email protected]) Acknowledgements Pilgrims were people wondering, wondering. Whom shall I meet now? (Anne Carson, 2000, p. 133) This report is the result of 24 months of hard work and cooperation from a remarkable group of people who in themselves model the very best of what the Shuswap Hut-to-Hut Trail and Waterway concept envisions. If every trail tells a story, and the richness of a trail is in the experiences it guides us to, then the journey of friendships, dreams, disappointments and rediscovery, of natural wonders, and fine people met along the way are the true measures of its value. To everyone who has contributed to this pilgrimage into the landscape – a journey reflected in this report with plenty of untraveled trail ahead – thank you. You are the local geniuses of landscape that
    [Show full text]
  • The Grasslands of British Columbia
    The Grasslands of British Columbia The Grasslands of British Columbia Brian Wikeem Sandra Wikeem April 2004 COVER PHOTO Brian Wikeem, Solterra Resources Inc. GRAPHICS, MAPS, FIGURES Donna Falat, formerly Grasslands Conservation Council of B.C., Kamloops, B.C. Ryan Holmes, Grasslands Conservation Council of B.C., Kamloops, B.C. Glenda Mathew, Left Bank Design, Kamloops, B.C. PHOTOS Personal Photos: A. Batke, Andy Bezener, Don Blumenauer, Bruno Delesalle, Craig Delong, Bob Drinkwater, Wayne Erickson, Marylin Fuchs, Perry Grilz, Jared Hobbs, Ryan Holmes, Kristi Iverson, C. Junck, Bob Lincoln, Bob Needham, Paul Sandborn, Jim White, Brian Wikeem. Institutional Photos: Agriculture Agri-Food Canada, BC Archives, BC Ministry of Forests, BC Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection, and BC Parks. All photographs are the property of the original contributor and can not be reproduced without prior written permission of the owner. All photographs by J. Hobbs are © Jared Hobbs. © Grasslands Conservation Council of British Columbia 954A Laval Crescent Kamloops, B.C. V2C 5P5 http://www.bcgrasslands.org/ All rights reserved. No part of this document or publication may be reproduced in any form without prior written permission of the Grasslands Conservation Council of British Columbia. ii Dedication This book is dedicated to the Dr. Vernon pathfinders of our ecological Brink knowledge and understanding of Dr. Alastair grassland ecosystems in British McLean Columbia. Their vision looked Dr. Edward beyond the dust, cheatgrass and Tisdale grasshoppers, and set the course to Dr. Albert van restoring the biodiversity and beauty Ryswyk of our grasslands to pristine times. Their research, extension and teaching provided the foundation for scientific management of our grasslands.
    [Show full text]
  • Bc105 Report.Pdf
    SOIL SURVEY ^f the SHUSWAP LAKES AREA BRITISH COLUMBIA by A . B . Dawson and C . C . Kelley INTERIM REPORT Map Reference : Soil Map of the Shuswap Lakes Area Scale : 2 inches = 1 mile 1965 British Columbia Department of Agriculture Kelowna9 B . C . August, 1965 Price $1 .50 DESCRIPTION OF THE AREA Location and Extent .., l..OO O.O..eCO....OO..eOe...o,.e.o.e.o 2 Community Facilities oo OO..O.O~.....,.O.~.O..~~.~~.~~,~.~~..3 Physiography and Drainage O..OO)~.no~a...O~O.O~~~~~~."~~~~~. 4 Climate ....DO~.~O...~O. ~'~~.~~~.~..~.~~~~~~..~~~....~~~~~~.6 Agriculture ..OIJD...D~..l..~nOO~.~~.~~~.*.."~.".....~..~~~. 9 Origin of Soil Forming Deposits O.O~..O..O...~..O~CO..,~~~~. 11 Soil Mapping and Classification OO.o.....OOa ODOoaO.e.J.e.aO. 16 nark Gray Soils ..OOO...~L....~..Os~~.~~.....~.~....~ oooo., 57 . ii . Page Brown Wooded Soils ......................................... 67 Grizzly Hill Series ...................................... 67 Larch Hill Series ........................................ 70 O'Keefe Series ........................................... 72 Pari Series .............................................. 73 Lwnby Series ............................................. 75 White Series ............................................. 77 Moulton Series ........................................... 79 Glenemma Series ........................................... 80 Pillar Series ............................................. 82 Broderick Series ......................................... 84 Acid Brown Wooded Soils ...................................
    [Show full text]
  • British Columbia
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF CANADA COMMISSION GEOLOGIQUE DU CANADA PAPER 80-35 LATE QUATERNARY GEOLOGY AND GEOCHRONOLOGY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Part 2: Summary and Discussion of Radiocarbon-Dated Quaternary History JOHN J. CLAGUE Canada 1981 PAPER 80-35 LATE QUATERNARY GEOLOGY AND GEOCHRONOLOGY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Part 2: Summary and Discussion of Radiocarbon-Dated Quaternary History JOHN J. CLAGUE 1981 ©Minister of Supply and Services Canada 1981 Available in Canada through authorized bookstore agents and other bookstores or by mail from Canadian Government Publishing Centre Supply and Services Canada Hui 1, Quebec, Canada KI A OS9 and from Geological Survey of Canada 60 I Booth Street Ottawa, Canada Kl A OE& A deposit copy of this publication is also available for reference in public libraries across Canada Cat. No. M44-80/35E Canada: $4.00 ISBN - 0-660-10928-X Other countries: $4.80 Price subject to change without notice Author's Address Cordilleran Geology Division 100 West Pender Street Vancouver, B.C. V6B lRB Original manuscript submitted: 1979-09-26 Approved for publication: 1980-10-01 CONTENTS I Abstract/Resume 2 Introduction 2 Acknowledgments 3 The framework of late Quaternary geologic-climate units in British Columbia 3 Dates beyond radiocarbon range 5 Olympia nonglacial interval 5 Western System 5 Cowichan Head Formation 5 Paleoclimate 6 Interior System 6 South-central British Columbia 6 Bessette Sediments 7 Paleoclimate 7 Other areas in the Interior System 7 Rocky Mountain Trench 7 Babine Lake 7 A ti in region 7 Interior Plains 8 Summary
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Land Classification, 2017
    Catalogue no. 12-607-X ISBN 978-0-660-24501-0 Ecological Land Classification, 2017 Release date: March 1, 2018 How to obtain more information For information about this product or the wide range of services and data available from Statistics Canada, visit our website, www.statcan.gc.ca. You can also contact us by email at [email protected] telephone, from Monday to Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., at the following numbers: • Statistical Information Service 1-800-263-1136 • National telecommunications device for the hearing impaired 1-800-363-7629 • Fax line 1-514-283-9350 Depository Services Program • Inquiries line 1-800-635-7943 • Fax line 1-800-565-7757 Standards of service to the public Note of appreciation Statistics Canada is committed to serving its clients in a prompt, Canada owes the success of its statistical system to a reliable and courteous manner. To this end, Statistics Canada has long-standing partnership between Statistics Canada, the developed standards of service that its employees observe. To citizens of Canada, its businesses, governments and other obtain a copy of these service standards, please contact Statistics institutions. Accurate and timely statistical information could not Canada toll-free at 1-800-263-1136. The service standards are be produced without their continued co-operation and goodwill. also published on www.statcan.gc.ca under “Contact us” > “Standards of service to the public.” Published by authority of the Minister responsible for Statistics Canada © Minister of Industry, 2018 All rights reserved. Use of this publication is governed by the Statistics Canada Open Licence Agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • BRITISH COLUMBIA NEST RECORD SCHEME 54Th Annual Report
    BRITISH COLUMBIA NEST RECORD SCHEME 54th Annual Report - 2008 Nesting Season R. Wayne Campbell, Michael I. Preston, Linda M. Van Damme and Mark Nyhof Biodiversity Centre for Wildlife Studies Report No. 10 May 2009 PARTICIPANT PROFILES It is heartening that both long-time contributors, and new participants, recognize the significance of maintaining their support in the British Columbia Nest Record Scheme. A constant effort is required each year to encourage a steady flow of breeding information into the BCNRS to increase its effectiveness in understanding the breeding distribution, habitat requirements, and species’ biology in the province. The three individuals high-lighted this year, all born in Ontario, come from diverse backgrounds. Nancy and Jan are long-time contributors while Doug has been a major participant during the 2000s. All have played a key role in mentoring others. Nancy Krueger Nancy was born and raised in the Georgian Bay area of southern Ontario. She was fortunate to grow up on a 100 acre farm and enjoyed “hanging out” with the animals. She was not interested in birds at the time, and regrets missing some of the eastern songbirds, but does remember hearing singing Bobolinks and Eastern Meadowlarks every morning while tending to farm chores. In 1972 Nancy moved to British Columbia. Four years later, in 1976, she was introduced to birding through a joint field trip with the Prince George Naturalists Club and the Williams Lake Field Naturalists to Ten Mile Lake north of Quesnel. While enjoying the early morning walk Nancy was impressed that Alan and Frances Vyse’s son, Adam, had already identified 10 or 11 species by sound and she had yet to see a bird.
    [Show full text]