Wildlife Modelling and Species Accounts Technical Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wildlife Modelling and Species Accounts Technical Report WILDLIFE MODELLING AND SPECIES ACCOUNTS TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE TRANS MOUNTAIN PIPELINE ULC TRANS MOUNTAIN EXPANSION PROJECT December 2013 REP-NEB-TERA-00011 Prepared for: Prepared by: Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC Kinder Morgan Canada Inc. TERA Environmental Consultants Suite 2700, 300 – 5th Avenue S.W. Suite 1100, 815 - 8th Avenue S.W. Calgary, Alberta T2P 5J2 Calgary, Alberta T2P 3P2 Ph: 403-514-6400 Ph: 403-265-2885 TranMountain Pipeline ULC Volume 5C, ESA – Biophysical Technical Reports Trans Mountain Expansion Project Wildlife Modelling and Species Accounts Technical Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Project Overview .............................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Objectives ........................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.3 Standards ......................................................................................................................... 1-2 2.0 METHODS .................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Study Area Boundaries .................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Wildlife Indicators ............................................................................................................. 2-1 2.3 Life Requisites and Seasons of Use ................................................................................ 2-1 2.4 Habitat Modelling Approach ............................................................................................. 2-3 2.5 Ecosystem Mapping and Data Sources ........................................................................... 2-4 2.6 Field Ratings .................................................................................................................... 2-4 2.7 Habitat Suitability Ratings ................................................................................................ 2-5 2.8 Suitability Rating Adjustments ......................................................................................... 2-6 2.8.1 Adjustments for Anthropogenic Disturbance ...................................................... 2-6 2.8.2 Adjustments for Proximity to Landscape Features ............................................. 2-7 2.9 Indicator Distribution ........................................................................................................ 2-7 2.9.1 Model Evaluation and Refinement .................................................................... 2-10 3.0 MAMMAL SPECIES ACCOUNTS AND HABITAT MODELS ....................................................... 3-1 3.1 Grizzly Bear ...................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.1 Status .................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.1.2 Distribution .......................................................................................................... 3-2 3.1.3 General Ecology.................................................................................................. 3-3 3.1.4 Key Habitat Requirements .................................................................................. 3-4 3.1.5 Limiting Factors ................................................................................................... 3-5 3.1.6 Model Development ............................................................................................ 3-5 3.2 Woodland Caribou ........................................................................................................... 3-6 3.2.1 Status .................................................................................................................. 3-6 3.2.2 Distribution .......................................................................................................... 3-7 3.2.3 General Ecology.................................................................................................. 3-8 3.2.4 Limiting Factors ................................................................................................... 3-8 3.3 Moose .............................................................................................................................. 3-9 3.3.1 Status .................................................................................................................. 3-9 3.3.2 Distribution .......................................................................................................... 3-9 3.3.3 General Ecology................................................................................................ 3-10 3.3.4 Key Habitat Requirements ................................................................................ 3-11 3.3.5 Limiting Factors ................................................................................................. 3-12 3.3.6 Model Development .......................................................................................... 3-12 3.4 Forest Furbearers .......................................................................................................... 3-16 3.4.1 American Marten ............................................................................................... 3-17 3.4.2 Fisher ................................................................................................................ 3-20 3.5 Coastal Riparian Small Mammals .................................................................................. 3-23 3.5.1 Pacific Water Shrew .......................................................................................... 3-24 3.5.2 Mountain Beaver ............................................................................................... 3-25 3.6 Bats ................................................................................................................................ 3-28 3.6.1 Status ................................................................................................................ 3-29 3.6.2 Distribution ........................................................................................................ 3-29 3.6.3 General Ecology................................................................................................ 3-29 3.6.4 Key Habitat Requirements ................................................................................ 3-30 3.6.5 Limiting Factors ................................................................................................. 3-31 7894/December 2013 REP-NEB-TERA-00011 Page i TranMountain Pipeline ULC Volume 5C, ESA – Biophysical Technical Reports Trans Mountain Expansion Project Wildlife Modelling and Species Accounts Technical Report 3.6.6 Model Development .......................................................................................... 3-31 4.0 BIRD SPECIES ACCOUNTS AND HABITAT MODELS .............................................................. 4-1 4.1 Grassland/Shrub-Steppe Birds ........................................................................................ 4-1 4.1.1 Status .................................................................................................................. 4-2 4.1.2 Distribution .......................................................................................................... 4-2 4.1.3 General information ............................................................................................ 4-2 4.1.4 Key Habitat Requirements .................................................................................. 4-2 4.1.5 Limiting Factors ................................................................................................... 4-3 4.1.6 Model Development ............................................................................................ 4-3 4.2 Mature/Old Forest Birds ................................................................................................... 4-4 4.2.1 Status .................................................................................................................. 4-8 4.2.2 Distribution .......................................................................................................... 4-8 4.2.3 General information ............................................................................................ 4-8 4.2.4 Key Habitat Requirements .................................................................................. 4-8 4.2.5 Limiting Factors ................................................................................................... 4-9 4.2.6 Model Development ............................................................................................ 4-9 4.3 Early Seral Forest Birds ................................................................................................. 4-10 4.3.1 Status ................................................................................................................ 4-14 4.3.2 Distribution ........................................................................................................ 4-14 4.3.3 General Information .......................................................................................... 4-14 4.3.4 Key
Recommended publications
  • Gyrfalcon Falco Rusticolus
    Gyrfalcon Falco rusticolus Rob Florkiewicz surveys, this area was included. Eight eyries are known from this Characteristics and Range The northern-dwelling Gyrfalcon is part of the province; however, while up to 7 of these eyries have the largest falcon in the world. It breeds mostly along the Arctic been deemed occupied in a single year, no more than 3 have been coasts of North America, Europe and Asia (Booms et al. 2008). productive at the same time. Based on these data and other Over its range, its colour varies from white through silver-grey to sightings, the British Columbia Wildlife Branch estimates the almost black; silver-grey is the most common morph in British breeding population in the province to be fewer than 20 pairs Columbia. It nests on cliff ledges at sites that are often used for (Chutter 2008). decades and where considerable amounts of guano can accumulate. Ptarmigan provide the Gyrfalcon's main prey in In British Columbia, the Gyrfalcon nests on cliff ledges on British Columbia and productivity appears dependent on mountains in alpine areas, usually adjacent to rivers or lakes. ptarmigan numbers. Large size and hunting prowess make the Occasionally, it nests on cliffs of river banks and in abandoned Gyrfalcon a popular bird with falconers, who breed and train Golden Eagle nests. them to hunt waterfowl and other game birds. Conservation and Recommendations Whilst the Gyrfalcon is Distribution, Abundance, and Habitat Most Gyrfalcons breed designated as Not at Risk nationally by COSEWIC, it is Blue-listed along the Arctic coast; however, a few breed in the northwest in British Columbia due to its small known breeding population portion of the Northern Boreal Mountains Ecoprovince of British (British Columbia Ministry of Environment 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Okanagan Range Ecoregion
    Selecting Plants for Pollinators A Guide for Gardeners, Farmers, and Land Managers In the Okanagan Range Ecoregion Keremeos and Hedley Table of CONTENTS Why Support Pollinators? 4 Getting Started 5 Okanagan range 6 Meet the Pollinators 8 Plant Traits 10 Developing Plantings 12 Farms 13 Public Lands 14 Home Landscapes 15 Plants That Attract Pollinators 16 Habitat hints 20 Habitat and Nesting requirements 21 S.H.A.R.E. 22 Checklist 22 This is one of several guides for different regions of North America. Resources and Feedback 23 We welcome your feedback to assist us in making the future guides useful. Please contact us at [email protected] 2 Selecting Plants for Pollinators Selecting Plants for Pollinators A Guide for Gardeners, Farmers, and Land Managers In the Okanagan Range Ecoregion Keremeos and Hedley A NAPPC and Pollinator Partnership Canada™ Publication Okanagan Range 3 Why support pollinators? IN THEIR 1996 BOOK, THE FORGOTTEN POLLINATORS, Buchmann and Nabhan estimated that animal pollinators are needed for the reproduction “Flowering plants of 90% of fl owering plants and one third of human food crops. Each of us depends on these industrious pollinators in a practical way to provide us with the wide range of foods we eat. In addition, pollinators are part of the across wild, intricate web that supports the biological diversity in natural ecosystems that helps sustain our quality of life. farmed and even Abundant and healthy populations of pollinators can improve fruit set and quality, and increase fruit size. In farming situations this increases production per hectare. In the wild, biodiversity increases and wildlife urban landscapes food sources increase.
    [Show full text]
  • Minfile Nts 082Ese - Grand Forks
    MINFILE NTS 082ESE - GRAND FORKS Original release date: 1997 Researched and compiled by: B.N. Church and L.D. Jones The Grand Forks map area, located in south-central British Columbia, contains 261 documented mineral occurrences, including 108 past producers. The map area includes the historically important Greenwood mining camp, which continues to attract exploration interest and activity. Physiographic domains include the Okanagan Highland over most of the map area, and the Selkirk Mountains to the east of Lower Arrow Lake. The map area lies in the Omineca tectonic belt, which formed in Early to Middle Jurassic time as a result of the accretion of Paleozoic and Mesozoic oceanic and arc rocks of the Slide Mountain and Quesnel terranes. These terranes were delaminated from the oceanic lithosphere and stacked against the continental margin of the North America craton. The resulting calc-alkaline plutonism created a large number of Middle Jurassic intrusions of intermediate composition. These intrude the accreted terranes and the Proterozoic pericratonic Monashee Complex. Overprinting by Cretaceous Laramide and post-Laramide Tertiary transtensional structures has complicated the geology. Paleozoic age, unconformable bedded assemblages include the Knob Hill, Attwood and Anarchist groups. Knob Hill Group is Permo-Carboniferous, and possibly as old as Devonian, and consists of massive and banded MINFILE NTS 082ESE - Grand Forks metacherts and lesser amounts of quartz chlorite schist, amphibolitic schists and gneisses, and limestone bands. The rocks have been affected by deformation and metamorphism causing recrystallization and the development of foliation, quartz sweats parallel to foliation and much deformation of individual beds. The Attwood Group is Permian and consists of black argillite, sharpstone conglomerate, greywacke, limestone lenses and metavolcanic units.
    [Show full text]
  • Picturesque Lakefront Lot 78 - Big Bar Lake, BC
    ® Picturesque Lakefront Lot 78 - Big Bar Lake, BC Sam Hodson Personal Real Estate Corporation www.landquest.com [email protected] (604) 809-2616 ® Marketing British Columbia to the World® “The Source” for Oceanfront, Lakefront, Islands, Ranches, Resorts & Land in British Columbia www.landquest.com www.landquest.com Picturesque Lakefront Lot 78 - Big Bar Lake, BC PROPERTY DETAILS LOCATION You will find Big Bar Lake on the Cariboo Plateau Listing Number: 20245 of south central British Columbia, lying at the base of the Marble Mountain Range. It is on the edge of $299,000 Price: wilderness, but within a 5-hour drive of the Lower Taxes (2020): $1,280.97 Fraser Valley. This scenery rich area of BC remains to be discovered by most of those seeking refuge Size: 1.22 acres from the busy, hectic life of the Lower Mainland. Big Bar Lake is a place you can feel yourself going DESCRIPTION back in time. Very desirable, low bank, level waterfront property Big Bar Lake contains some of the cleanest, most with 150 ft of lakefront on Big Bar Lake. Spacious clear water to be found in the region. The colour 1.22 acre lot. The lake is one of the true gems of the water and of the shoals reminds one of the of the Cariboo region; in the heart of BC Cariboo waters of the Bahamas and Hawaii, with deep ranching community and boasts to be the most green depths and green-white shallows. Unlike scenic area in BC. The property is a fantastic south a majority of BC Interior lakes, is not tea colored.
    [Show full text]
  • Basin Architecture of the North Okanagan Valley Fill, British Columbia
    BASIN ARCHITECTURE OF THE NORTH OKANAGAN VALLEY FILL, BRITISH COLUMBIA sandy Vanderburgh B.Sc., University of Calgary I984 M.Sc., University of Calgary 1987 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Department of Geography 0 Sandy Vanderburgh SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY July 1993 All rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. APPROVAL ' Name: Sandy Vanderburgh Degree: Doctor of Philosophy Title of Thesis: Basin Architecture Of The North Okanagan Valley Fill, British Columbia Examining Committee: Chair: Alison M. Gill Associate Professor Dr. M.C. Roberts, Protessor Senior Supervisor Idr. H. Hickin, professor Dr. Dirk Tempelman-Kluit, Director Cordilleran Division, Geological Survey of Canada Dr. R.W. Mathewes, Professor, Department of Biological Sciences Internal Examiner Dr. James A. Hunter, Senior scientist & Program Co-ordinator, Terrain Sciences Division Geological Survey of Canada External Examiner Date Approved: Julv 16. 1993 PARTIAL COPYRIGHT LICENSE 8* I hereby grant to Simon Fraser University the right to lend my thesis, projector extended essay (the title of which is shown below) to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. I further agree that permission for multiple copying of this work for scholarly purposes may be granted by me or the Dean of Graduate Studies. It is understood that copying or publication of this work for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Chironomid-Based Paleosalinity Reconstruction of Three Lakes in the South-Central Interior of British Columbia, Canada
    CHIRONOMID-BASED PALEOSALINITY RECONSTRUCTION OF THREE LAKES IN THE SOUTH-CENTRAL INTERIOR OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, CANADA Mark (Markus) L. Heinrichs PBD (Education), Simon Fraser University, 1993 PDP, Simon Fraser University, 1993 B .Sc., Simon Fraser University, 1991 Dipl. T. (Chem.), Northern Alberta Inst. of Tech., 1984 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE in the Department of Biological Sciences %arkus Heinrichs 1995 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY September 1995 All rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. APPROVAL Name: Mark (Markus) Lyle Heinrichs Degree: Master of Science Title of Thesis: CHIRONOMID-BASED PALEOSALINITY RECONSTRUCTION OF THREE LAKES IN THE SOUTH-CENTRAL INTERIOR OF BRlTISH COLUMBIA Examining Committee: Chair: Dr. R. Ydenberg, Professor DE,R. Maihevbes, Professor, Senior Supervisor Department of Biological Sciences, SFU Dr. I. Walker, Adjunct Professor Department of Biological Sciences, SFU Dr. Ken H$T ofe or of Civil Engineering Westwater Fd~entre,UBC Public Examiner Date Approved UC& 2, /Pi5 .. 11 PARTIAL COPYRIGHT LICENSE I hereby grant to Simon Fraser University the right to lend my thesis, project or extended essay (the title of which is shown below) to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. I further agree that permission for multiple copying of this work for scholarly purposes may be granted by me or the Dean of Graduate Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • North Thompson Official Community Plan
    Schedule “A” to Bylaw 2700 North Thompson Official Community Plan Foreword and Acknowledgements The North Thompson Official Community Plan is the outcome of over two years of research, public participation and planning. The Regional District is grateful to all those residents and groups who provided interest, passion, and support from all corners of the Plan area culminating in the Plan development. In particular, we wish to recognize the following people for the exceptional amount of time and energy they dedicated to the planning process. OCP Advisory Committee Director Carol Schaffer, Electoral Area “A” Director Stephen Quinn, Electoral Area “B” Director Bill Kershaw, Electoral Area “O” Tom Eustache – Simpcw First Nation Rick Dee Harley Wright Willow Macdonald (past member) Meetings, Conversations and Information Providers Anna Kay Eldridge – Simpcw First Nation Ashley Dyck – Planning Services Celia Nord – Little Shuswap Indian Band Chris Ortner Dan Winiski Doris Laner – North Thompson Arts Council James Demens and Brandon Gustafsen – Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure Jenny Green and Clare Audet – Interior Health Authority Kelly Funk – Kelly Funk Photography Laura Ryser – Research Manager, Rural and Small Town Studies Program, UNBC Leanne Nystoruk Mike Scarff, TNRD GIS Services PIBC and the Planners from the local Interior Chapter Sarah Cooke and Mike Cloet – Ministry of Mines, Energy and Petroleum Resources Staff and students at Clearwater and Barriere Secondary Schools Staff from the Agricultural Land Commission Staff
    [Show full text]
  • Late Prehistoric Cultural Horizons on the Canadian Plateau
    LATE PREHISTORIC CULTURAL HORIZONS ON THE CANADIAN PLATEAU Department of Archaeology Thomas H. Richards Simon Fraser University Michael K. Rousseau Publication Number 16 1987 Archaeology Press Simon Fraser University Burnaby, B.C. PUBLICATIONS COMMITTEE Roy L. Carlson (Chairman) Knut R. Fladmark Brian Hayden Philip M. Hobler Jack D. Nance Erie Nelson All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. ISBN 0-86491-077-0 PRINTED IN CANADA The Department of Archaeology publishes papers and monographs which relate to its teaching and research interests. Communications concerning publications should be directed to the Chairman of the Publications Committee. © Copyright 1987 Department of Archaeology Simon Fraser University Late Prehistoric Cultural Horizons on the Canadian Plateau by Thomas H. Richards and Michael K. Rousseau Department of Archaeology Simon Fraser University Publication Number 16 1987 Burnaby, British Columbia We respectfully dedicate this volume to the memory of CHARLES E. BORDEN (1905-1978) the father of British Columbia archaeology. 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Acknowledgements.................................................................................................................................vii List of Figures.....................................................................................................................................iv
    [Show full text]
  • Thurston County Species List
    Washington Gap Analysis Project 202 Species Predicted or Breeding in: Thurston County CODE COMMON NAME Amphibians RACAT Bullfrog RHCAS Cascade torrent salamander ENES Ensatina AMMA Long-toed salamander AMGR Northwestern salamander RAPR Oregon spotted frog DITE Pacific giant salamander PSRE Pacific treefrog (Chorus frog) RAAU Red-legged frog TAGR Roughskin newt ASTR Tailed frog PLVA Van Dyke's salamander PLVE Western redback salamander BUBO Western toad Birds BOLE American bittern FUAM American coot COBR American crow CIME American dipper CATR American goldfinch FASP American kestrel TUMI American robin HALE Bald eagle COFA Band-tailed pigeon HIRU Barn swallow STVA Barred owl CEAL Belted kingfisher THBE Bewick's wren PAAT Black-capped chickadee PHME Black-headed grosbeak ELLE Black-shouldered kite (White-tailed kite DENI Black-throated gray warbler DEOB Blue grouse ANDI Blue-winged teal EUCY Brewer's blackbird CEAM Brown creeper MOAT Brown-headed cowbird PSMI Bushtit CACAL California quail BRCA Canada goose VISO Cassin's vireo (Solitary vireo) BOCE Cedar waxwing PARU Chestnut-backed chickadee SPPA Chipping sparrow NatureMapping 2007 Washington Gap Analysis Project ANCY Cinnamon teal HIPY Cliff swallow TYAL Common barn-owl MERME Common merganser CHMI Common nighthawk COCOR Common raven GAGA Common snipe GETR Common yellowthroat ACCO Cooper's hawk JUHY Dark-eyed (Oregon) junco PIPU Downy woodpecker STVU European starling COVE Evening grosbeak PAIL Fox sparrow ANST Gadwall AQCH Golden eagle RESA Golden-crowned kinglet PECA Gray jay ARHE Great
    [Show full text]
  • Order in Council 1780/1986
    COLUMBIA 1780 APPROVED AND ORDERED SEP 24.1986 Lieutenant-Governer EXECUTIVE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, VICTORIA SEP 24.1986 On the recommendation of the undersigned, the Lieutenant-Governor, by and with the advice and consent of the Executive Council, orders that a general election be held in all the electoral districts for the election of members to serve in the Legislative Assembly; AND FURTHER ORDERS THAT Writs of Election be issued on September 24, 1986 in accordance with Section 40 of the Election Act; AND THAT in each electoral district the place for the nomination of candidates for election to membership and service in the Legislative Assembly shall be the office of the Returning Officer; AND THAT A Proclamation to that end be made. ...-- • iti PROVINCI1‘( ,IT/ ECRETARYT(' AND MINISTER OF GOVERNMENT SERVICES PRESIDING MEMBER OF THE E ECUTIVE COUNCIL (This part is for administrative purposes and it not part of the Order.) Authority under which Order is made: Election Act - sec. 33 f )40 Act and section. Other (specify) Statutory authority checked r9Z 4,4fAr 6-A (Signet, typed or printed name of Legal OfOra) ELECTION ACT WRIT OF ELECTION FORM 1 (section 40) ELIZABETH II, by the Grace of God, of the United Kingdom, Canada and Her Other Realms and Territories, QUEEN, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith. To the Returning Officer of the Electoral District of Coquitlam-Moody GREETING: We command you that, notice of time and place of election being given, you do cause election to be made, according to law, of a member (or members
    [Show full text]
  • Okanagan Ecoregional Assessment  Volume 1  Report
    VOLUME Okanagan 1 Ecoregional Assessment REPORT October 2006 OKANAGAN ECOREGIONAL ASSESSMENT VOLUME 1 REPORT Okanagan Ecoregional Assessment October 2006 Prepared by Nature Conservancy of Canada The Nature Conservancy of Washington and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife OKANAGAN ECOREGIONAL ASSESSMENT VOLUME 1 REPORT Okanagan Ecoregional Assessment Volume 1 – Report Citation: Pryce, B., P. Iachetti, G. Wilhere, K. Ciruna, J. Floberg, R. Crawford, R. Dye, M. Fairbarns, S. Farone, S. Ford, M. Goering, M. Heiner, G. Kittel, J. Lewis, D. Nicolson, and N. Warner. 2006. Okanagan Ecoregional Assessment, Volume 1 – Report. Prepared by Nature Conservancy of Canada, The Nature Conservancy of Washington, and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife with support from the British Columbia Conservation Data Centre, Washington Department of Natural Resources Natural Heritage Program, and NatureServe. Nature Conservancy of Canada, Victoria, British Columbia. Cover Design: Paul Mazzucca Copyright © 2006 Nature Conservancy of Canada Vancouver, British Columbia Issued by: The Nature Conservancy of Canada Cover Photo Credits: #300 – 1205 Broad Street Methow Valley, Robin Dye; Western screech owl, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada V8W 2A4 A.M. Bezener/One Wild Earth Photography; Great Email: [email protected] basin spadefoot toad, A.M. Bezener/One Wild Earth Photography; Seton Lake, Ian Routley; Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data: Townsends big-eared bat, Harry van Oort; Mormon metalmark, Orville Dyer; East Chopaka, ISBN 1-897386-00-1 Barbara Pryce; Mountain bluebird, Ian Routley; 1. Biological inventory and assessment – Sockeye salmon, Kristy Ciruna; Badgers, Philippe Okanagan. Verkerk; Lynx, Grant Merrill; Mountain lady’s I. Nature Conservancy of Canada. slipper, George Thornton; Long-billed curlew, Ian II.
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain Beavers
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln The Handbook: Prevention and Control of Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center Wildlife Damage for July 1994 Mountain Beavers Dan L. Campbell USDA-APHIS-Animal Damage Control, Olympia, WA Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdmhandbook Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Campbell, Dan L., "Mountain Beavers" (1994). The Handbook: Prevention and Control of Wildlife Damage. 14. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdmhandbook/14 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Handbook: Prevention and Control of Wildlife Damage by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Dan L. Campbell Project Leader Olympia Field Station MOUNTAIN BEAVERS Denver Wildlife Research Center USDA-APHIS- Animal Damage Control Olympia, Washington 98512 Fig. 1. Mountain beaver, Aplodontia rufa Damage Prevention and Repellents Identification Control Methods 36% Big Game Repellent Powder has The mountain beaver (Aplodontia rufa, been registered for mountain beaver Exclusion Fig. 1) is a medium-sized rodent in the in Washington and Oregon. family Aplodontiadae. There are no Use plastic mesh seedling protectors Toxicants other species in the family. Average on small tree seedlings. Wire mesh adults weigh 2.3 pounds (1,050 g) and cages are somewhat effective, but A pelleted strychnine alkaloid bait was range from 1.8 to 3.5 pounds (800 to large diameter cages are expensive registered in Oregon but may be 1,600 g). Average overall length is 13.5 and allow animals to enter them.
    [Show full text]