DOCSLIB.ORG

Okanagan Ecoregional Assessment  Volume 1  Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Okanagan Ecoregional Assessment  Volume 1  Report VOLUME Okanagan 1 Ecoregional Assessment REPORT October 2006 OKANAGAN ECOREGIONAL ASSESSMENT VOLUME 1 REPORT Okanagan Ecoregional Assessment October 2006 Prepared by Nature Conservancy of Canada The Nature Conservancy of Washington and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife OKANAGAN ECOREGIONAL ASSESSMENT VOLUME 1 REPORT Okanagan Ecoregional Assessment Volume 1 – Report Citation: Pryce, B., P. Iachetti, G. Wilhere, K. Ciruna, J. Floberg, R. Crawford, R. Dye, M. Fairbarns, S. Farone, S. Ford, M. Goering, M. Heiner, G. Kittel, J. Lewis, D. Nicolson, and N. Warner. 2006. Okanagan Ecoregional Assessment, Volume 1 – Report. Prepared by Nature Conservancy of Canada, The Nature Conservancy of Washington, and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife with support from the British Columbia Conservation Data Centre, Washington Department of Natural Resources Natural Heritage Program, and NatureServe. Nature Conservancy of Canada, Victoria, British Columbia. Cover Design: Paul Mazzucca Copyright © 2006 Nature Conservancy of Canada Vancouver, British Columbia Issued by: The Nature Conservancy of Canada Cover Photo Credits: #300 – 1205 Broad Street Methow Valley, Robin Dye; Western screech owl, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada V8W 2A4 A.M. Bezener/One Wild Earth Photography; Great Email: [email protected] basin spadefoot toad, A.M. Bezener/One Wild Earth Photography; Seton Lake, Ian Routley; Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data: Townsends big-eared bat, Harry van Oort; Mormon metalmark, Orville Dyer; East Chopaka, ISBN 1-897386-00-1 Barbara Pryce; Mountain bluebird, Ian Routley; 1. Biological inventory and assessment – Sockeye salmon, Kristy Ciruna; Badgers, Philippe Okanagan. Verkerk; Lynx, Grant Merrill; Mountain lady’s I. Nature Conservancy of Canada. slipper, George Thornton; Long-billed curlew, Ian II. Okanagan Ecoregional Assessment, Volume 1 – Routley; Similkameen River, Barbara Pryce. Report. Includes bibliographical references OKANAGAN ECOREGIONAL ASSESSMENT VOLUME 1 REPORT Acknowledgements A charter for the Okanagan Ecoregional Assessment was signed in October 2003 initiating a process to develop a biodiversity conservation assessment unprecedented in this geographic area. Since that time, many people have supported the project to develop this document and a set of tools to assist in the conservation of this ecoregion’s unique, irreplaceable and vulnerable species, natural communities and ecological systems. This ambitious undertaking would not have been possible without generous funding provided by the W. Garfield Weston Foundation, the Bullitt Foundation, the Icicle Fund, the Donner Canadian Foundation, the Nature Conservancy of Canada’s British Columbia Region and National Offices, The Nature Conservancy’s Washington Chapter, and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. Funding was also provided by Parks Canada and through a state wildlife grant from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service. The British Columbia Conservation Data Centre, the Washington Department of Natural Resources’ Natural Heritage Program, and NatureServe provided significant in-kind support to the Okanagan Ecoregional Assessment. The authors want to thank a number of people who provided us with extraordinary data and expertise which greatly enhanced our assessment. Thank you to Dennis Lloyd of the Ministry of Forests and Range for giving us his biogeoclimatic ecosystem classification update in advance of publication; Orville Dyer of the Ministry of Environment for his work with the Animals Subteam and for providing us with the Okanagan Regional Wildlife Sitings Database; Peter Morrison of the Pacific Biodiversity Institute, Chris Chappell of the Washington Natural Heritage Program, George Wooten of Conservation Northwest and Terry Lillybridge and Rod Clausnitzner of the U.S. Forest Service all made significant contribution to the terrestrial ecosystem classification; Andrew Harcombe, Shane Ford, Carmen Cadrin and other staff at the BC Conservation Data Centre provided not only data, but guidance and expertise as well; Bruno Delesalle, Ryan Holmes and Graham MacGregor of the Grassland Conservation Council of British Columbia for provision of their extensive Priority Grasslands Mapping Initiative database and considerable expertise. We want to thank Brian Wikeem, Mike Ryan and Dave Jones who gave of their time and knowledge. Katherine Glew must be acknowledged for compiling information on lichens in the ecoregion and also Geoff Scudder for his participation on the Animals and Freshwater Subteams as well as his input during the process. Huilin Wang of the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife did most of the GIS work for the irreplaceability analysis. Brad Thompson of the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife re-analyzed the salmon EDT outputs and provided advice on how to use this information. Margaret Hartzell with the USFS was very helpful in arranging meetings with her staff early on so they could learn about the assessment and collaborate as appropriate and possible. Joe Peone, Rebecca Peone and Sheri Sears from the Colville Confederated Tribes deserve special praise for their expertise, provision of data, access to their staff and guidance as well as for allowing us to use their offices for workshops and meetings. We are indebted to the many experts who participated in a wide variety of ways throughout the process to bring the Okanagan Ecoregional Assessment to completion. We have listed the many people who helped us in Appendix 3. OKANAGAN ECOREGIONAL ASSESSMENT VOLUME 1 REPORT Okanagan Ecoregional Assessment Core Team Leadership for the assessment process was shared between the Nature Conservancy Canada (NCC) and The Nature Conservancy (TNC). The Core Team members and their roles are listed below. Kristy Ciruna, Director of Conservation Programs, NCC, British Columbia Rex Crawford, Vegetation Ecologist - Eastern Washington, Washington Natural Heritage Program, Washington Department of Natural Resources, Washington Robin Dye, Conservation Planner, TNC, Washington Matt Fairbarns, Conservation Botanist, Aruncus Consulting, British Columbia Steve Farone, Northwest Ecoregional Applications Manager, TNC, Washington John Floberg, Manager of Ecoregional Planning, TNC, Washington Shane Ford, Botanist, Conservation Data Centre, Ministry of Environment, British Columbia Mark Goering, GIS Manager, TNC, Washington Mike Heiner, TNC, Washington Pierre Iachetti, Director of Conservation Planning, NCC, British Columbia Gwen Kittel, Vegetation Ecologist, NatureServe, Colorado Jeff Lewis, Wildlife Biologist, Wildlife Program, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), Washington Dave Nicolson, Conservation Planner / GIS Analyst, NCC, British Columbia Barbara Pryce, Core Team Lead, Okanagan Program Manager, NCC, British Columbia Sairah Tyler, Conservation Planning Consultant, NCC, British Columbia Nancy Warner, North Central Washington Program Director, TNC, Washington George Wilhere, Conservation Biologist, Wildlife Program, WDFW, Washington Appendix 2 lists the many people who supported the Core Team through the assessment process OKANAGAN ECOREGIONAL ASSESSMENT VOLUME 1 REPORT Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................... VII CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................1 1.1 Okanagan Ecoregion Overview .............................................................................2 1.1.1 Biogeographical Setting............................................................................3 1.1.2 Socio-economic Environment ....................................................................4 1.1.3 Land Ownership and Management .............................................................5 1.1.4 Land Use History of the Okanagan Ecoregion............................................7 1.2 Biodiversity Status of the Okanagan Ecoregion .....................................................8 1.3 Ecoregion Boundary ........................................................................................... 11 1.3.1 Terrestrial Ecosections ........................................................................... 13 1.3.2 Freshwater Ecological Drainage Units.................................................... 13 1.3.3 Assessment Units .................................................................................... 14 CHAPTER 2 – THE ASSESSMENT PROCESS..................................................................... 15 2.1 Identifying Conservation Targets ........................................................................ 15 2.2 Assembling Information on Target Locations ...................................................... 15 2.3 Setting Target Goals........................................................................................... 16 2.4 Rating Conservation Suitability of Different Portions of the Ecoregion .......................................................................................................... 17 2.5 Assembling Terrestrial and Freshwater Portfolios................................................ 17 2.6 Creating the Portfolios ....................................................................................... 17 2.7 Expert Review ................................................................................................... 17 2.8 Prioritization of Portfolios.................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Washington Climate Change Impacts Assessment
    The Washington Climate Change Impacts Assessment Evaluating Washington’s Future in a Changing Climate ........................................................................................................ A report by The Climate Impacts Group University of Washington Climate Science June 2009 in the Public Interest Recommended citation: Climate Impacts Group, 2009. The Washington Climate Change Impacts Assessment, M. McGuire Elsner, J. Littell, and L Whitely Binder (eds). Center for Science in the Earth System, Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Oceans, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. Available at: http://www.cses.washington.edu/db/pdf/wacciareport681.pdf Front cover satellite image credit: http://visibleearth.nasa.gov/view_rec.php?vev1id=4786 NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration Visible Earth: A catalog of NASA images and animations of our home planet Provided by the SeaWiFS Project, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, and ORBIMAGE The Pacific Northwest is cloud-free in this SeaWiFS image. Multihued phytoplankton blooms are visible off of Washington's Olympic coast. Also visible in this image are: Fraser River outflow, snowcapped peaks of Mt. Olympus, Mt. Rainier, Mt. Adams, Mt. Hood, Mt. Jefferson, the Three Sisters, the North Cascades, and the Columbia and Snake River watersheds. Metadata * Sensor OrbView-2/SeaWiFS * Visualization Date 2000-09-26 * The Visible Earth is part of the EOS Project Science Office located at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. Small images credits: Wheat: © 2009 www.photos.com Coast; Seattle skyline: © J. Martin Grassley McNary Dam: courtesy Bonneville Power Administration Salmon: courtesy University of Washington News and Information Forest: courtesy Climate Impacts Group, University of Washington Report design: Beth Tully, Edit-Design Center, University of Washington The Washington Climate Change Impacts Assessment Evaluating Washington’s Future in a Changing Climate ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Willows of Interior Alaska
    1 Willows of Interior Alaska Dominique M. Collet US Fish and Wildlife Service 2004 2 Willows of Interior Alaska Acknowledgements The development of this willow guide has been made possible thanks to funding from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service- Yukon Flats National Wildlife Refuge - order 70181-12-M692. Funding for printing was made available through a collaborative partnership of Natural Resources, U.S. Army Alaska, Department of Defense; Pacific North- west Research Station, U.S. Forest Service, Department of Agriculture; National Park Service, and Fairbanks Fish and Wildlife Field Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior; and Bonanza Creek Long Term Ecological Research Program, University of Alaska Fairbanks. The data for the distribution maps were provided by George Argus, Al Batten, Garry Davies, Rob deVelice, and Carolyn Parker. Carol Griswold, George Argus, Les Viereck and Delia Person provided much improvement to the manuscript by their careful editing and suggestions. I want to thank Delia Person, of the Yukon Flats National Wildlife Refuge, for initiating and following through with the development and printing of this guide. Most of all, I am especially grateful to Pamela Houston whose support made the writing of this guide possible. Any errors or omissions are solely the responsibility of the author. Disclaimer This publication is designed to provide accurate information on willows from interior Alaska. If expert knowledge is required, services of an experienced botanist should be sought. Contents
    [Show full text]
  • Okanagan Range Ecoregion
    Selecting Plants for Pollinators A Guide for Gardeners, Farmers, and Land Managers In the Okanagan Range Ecoregion Keremeos and Hedley Table of CONTENTS Why Support Pollinators? 4 Getting Started 5 Okanagan range 6 Meet the Pollinators 8 Plant Traits 10 Developing Plantings 12 Farms 13 Public Lands 14 Home Landscapes 15 Plants That Attract Pollinators 16 Habitat hints 20 Habitat and Nesting requirements 21 S.H.A.R.E. 22 Checklist 22 This is one of several guides for different regions of North America. Resources and Feedback 23 We welcome your feedback to assist us in making the future guides useful. Please contact us at [email protected] 2 Selecting Plants for Pollinators Selecting Plants for Pollinators A Guide for Gardeners, Farmers, and Land Managers In the Okanagan Range Ecoregion Keremeos and Hedley A NAPPC and Pollinator Partnership Canada™ Publication Okanagan Range 3 Why support pollinators? IN THEIR 1996 BOOK, THE FORGOTTEN POLLINATORS, Buchmann and Nabhan estimated that animal pollinators are needed for the reproduction “Flowering plants of 90% of fl owering plants and one third of human food crops. Each of us depends on these industrious pollinators in a practical way to provide us with the wide range of foods we eat. In addition, pollinators are part of the across wild, intricate web that supports the biological diversity in natural ecosystems that helps sustain our quality of life. farmed and even Abundant and healthy populations of pollinators can improve fruit set and quality, and increase fruit size. In farming situations this increases production per hectare. In the wild, biodiversity increases and wildlife urban landscapes food sources increase.
    [Show full text]
  • Okanagan Valley
    OKANAGAN VALLEY DESTINATION DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY HIGHLIGHTS MYRA CANYON Photo: Grant Harder THANK WHAT’S YOU INSIDE The Okanagan Valley Destination Thank you to our tourism partners 1. INTRODUCTION Development Strategy is the outcome who participated in the process by of a nineteen-month, iterative process attending community meetings, 2. REALIZING THE POTENTIAL of gathering, synthesizing, and participating in surveys and validating information with tourism interviews, engaging in follow-up 3. AT A GLANCE partners about the current status conversations, and forwarding 4. GEARING UP and future direction of tourism in relevant documents and insights. the Okanagan Valley planning area. Special thanks to the members of the Working Group, as well as the We thank the Syilx people and the facilitator of the destination Okanagan Nation on whose traditional development process. territories we gathered for meetings in Kelowna and Summerland. OKANAGAN VALLEY | 2 1 INTRODUCTION WHY A STRATEGY? District, and part of electoral area E (West Boundary) the creation of a provincial destination development of the Regional District of Kootenay Boundary. strategy thereby ensuring a truly integrated and The Okanagan Valley Destination Development Municipalities include Lake Country, Kelowna, West cohesive combination of bottom-up and top-down Strategy was developed to enhance the competitiveness Kelowna, Peachland, Summerland, Penticton, Oliver, destination planning. of the Okanagan Valley planning area over the next 10 Keremeos, and Osoyoos. The planning area includes years and beyond. The strategy was developed as part most of the Okanagan Valley, Sakha Lake, and the of Destination BC’s Destination Development Program Okanagan River. A KEY IMPERATIVE to support and guide the long-term growth of tourism in British Columbia.
    [Show full text]
  • Minfile Nts 082Ese - Grand Forks
    MINFILE NTS 082ESE - GRAND FORKS Original release date: 1997 Researched and compiled by: B.N. Church and L.D. Jones The Grand Forks map area, located in south-central British Columbia, contains 261 documented mineral occurrences, including 108 past producers. The map area includes the historically important Greenwood mining camp, which continues to attract exploration interest and activity. Physiographic domains include the Okanagan Highland over most of the map area, and the Selkirk Mountains to the east of Lower Arrow Lake. The map area lies in the Omineca tectonic belt, which formed in Early to Middle Jurassic time as a result of the accretion of Paleozoic and Mesozoic oceanic and arc rocks of the Slide Mountain and Quesnel terranes. These terranes were delaminated from the oceanic lithosphere and stacked against the continental margin of the North America craton. The resulting calc-alkaline plutonism created a large number of Middle Jurassic intrusions of intermediate composition. These intrude the accreted terranes and the Proterozoic pericratonic Monashee Complex. Overprinting by Cretaceous Laramide and post-Laramide Tertiary transtensional structures has complicated the geology. Paleozoic age, unconformable bedded assemblages include the Knob Hill, Attwood and Anarchist groups. Knob Hill Group is Permo-Carboniferous, and possibly as old as Devonian, and consists of massive and banded MINFILE NTS 082ESE - Grand Forks metacherts and lesser amounts of quartz chlorite schist, amphibolitic schists and gneisses, and limestone bands. The rocks have been affected by deformation and metamorphism causing recrystallization and the development of foliation, quartz sweats parallel to foliation and much deformation of individual beds. The Attwood Group is Permian and consists of black argillite, sharpstone conglomerate, greywacke, limestone lenses and metavolcanic units.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
    [Show full text]
  • University of California Santa Cruz Responding to An
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ RESPONDING TO AN EMERGENT PLANT PEST-PATHOGEN COMPLEX ACROSS SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SCALES A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES with an emphasis in ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY by Shannon Colleen Lynch December 2020 The Dissertation of Shannon Colleen Lynch is approved: Professor Gregory S. Gilbert, chair Professor Stacy M. Philpott Professor Andrew Szasz Professor Ingrid M. Parker Quentin Williams Acting Vice Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies Copyright © by Shannon Colleen Lynch 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables iv List of Figures vii Abstract x Dedication xiii Acknowledgements xiv Chapter 1 – Introduction 1 References 10 Chapter 2 – Host Evolutionary Relationships Explain 12 Tree Mortality Caused by a Generalist Pest– Pathogen Complex References 38 Chapter 3 – Microbiome Variation Across a 66 Phylogeographic Range of Tree Hosts Affected by an Emergent Pest–Pathogen Complex References 110 Chapter 4 – On Collaborative Governance: Building Consensus on 180 Priorities to Manage Invasive Species Through Collective Action References 243 iii LIST OF TABLES Chapter 2 Table I Insect vectors and corresponding fungal pathogens causing 47 Fusarium dieback on tree hosts in California, Israel, and South Africa. Table II Phylogenetic signal for each host type measured by D statistic. 48 Table SI Native range and infested distribution of tree and shrub FD- 49 ISHB host species. Chapter 3 Table I Study site attributes. 124 Table II Mean and median richness of microbiota in wood samples 128 collected from FD-ISHB host trees. Table III Fungal endophyte-Fusarium in vitro interaction outcomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Basin Architecture of the North Okanagan Valley Fill, British Columbia
    BASIN ARCHITECTURE OF THE NORTH OKANAGAN VALLEY FILL, BRITISH COLUMBIA sandy Vanderburgh B.Sc., University of Calgary I984 M.Sc., University of Calgary 1987 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Department of Geography 0 Sandy Vanderburgh SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY July 1993 All rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. APPROVAL ' Name: Sandy Vanderburgh Degree: Doctor of Philosophy Title of Thesis: Basin Architecture Of The North Okanagan Valley Fill, British Columbia Examining Committee: Chair: Alison M. Gill Associate Professor Dr. M.C. Roberts, Protessor Senior Supervisor Idr. H. Hickin, professor Dr. Dirk Tempelman-Kluit, Director Cordilleran Division, Geological Survey of Canada Dr. R.W. Mathewes, Professor, Department of Biological Sciences Internal Examiner Dr. James A. Hunter, Senior scientist & Program Co-ordinator, Terrain Sciences Division Geological Survey of Canada External Examiner Date Approved: Julv 16. 1993 PARTIAL COPYRIGHT LICENSE 8* I hereby grant to Simon Fraser University the right to lend my thesis, projector extended essay (the title of which is shown below) to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. I further agree that permission for multiple copying of this work for scholarly purposes may be granted by me or the Dean of Graduate Studies. It is understood that copying or publication of this work for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Rural Food and Wine Tourism in Canada's South Okanagan Valley
    sustainability Article Rural Food and Wine Tourism in Canada’s South Okanagan Valley: Transformations for Food Sovereignty? Danielle Robinson 1,2 1 School of Business, Okanagan College, BC V1Y 4X8, Canada 2 Community, Culture and Global Studies, Irving K. Barber Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, V1V 1V7, Canada; [email protected] Abstract: This interdisciplinary research analyses the relationships between food sovereignty prin- ciples and food and wine tourism in rural contexts by asking how rural tourism stakeholders understand these concepts, mobilize the interrelationships, and to what purpose. Wine and food tourism is one of the fastest-growing rural tourism niches, with effects on the orientation of food systems, the livelihoods of producers, the viability of rural communities, and the biophysical environ- ment. Secondary research and semi-structured interviews provide insights into how qualities of food sovereignty transitions are conceptualized, recognized, developed, supported, and promoted in the case of British Columbia’s South Okanagan Valley. An appreciative approach was used because this research aims to understand rural food and wine tourism’s potential contribution to food sovereignty. Although the term ‘food sovereignty’ did not resonate for most participants, qualities of a transition towards food sovereignty such as reorienting agriculture, food processing and consumption to the local region, supporting rural economies and environmental sustainability were considered integral to rural food tourism. Participants saw future opportunities for rural food and wine tourism to serve broader transformative purposes that would benefit locals, visitors, and the environment. Research results could be used to inspire critical academic, community and policy dialogue about food sovereignty in wine and food tourism destinations.
    [Show full text]
  • Fraser Valley Geotour: Bedrock, Glacial Deposits, Recent Sediments, Geological Hazards and Applied Geology: Sumas Mountain and Abbotsford Area
    Fraser Valley Geotour: Bedrock, Glacial Deposits, Recent Sediments, Geological Hazards and Applied Geology: Sumas Mountain and Abbotsford Area A collaboration in support of teachers in and around Abbotsford, B.C. in celebration of National Science and Technology Week October 25, 2013 MineralsEd and Natural Resources Canada, Geological Survey of Canada Led by David Huntley, PhD, GSC and David Thompson, P Geo 1 2 Fraser Valley Geotour Introduction Welcome to the Fraser Valley Geotour! Learning about our Earth, geological processes and features, and the relevance of it all to our lives is really best addressed outside of a classroom. Our entire province is the laboratory for geological studies. The landscape and rocks in the Fraser Valley record many natural Earth processes and reveal a large part of the geologic history of this part of BC – a unique part of the Canadian Cordillera. This professional development field trip for teachers looks at a selection of the bedrock and overlying surficial sediments in the Abbotsford area that evidence these geologic processes over time. The stops highlight key features that are part of the geological story - demonstrating surface processes, recording rock – forming processes, revealing the tectonic history, and evidence of glaciation. The important interplay of these phenomena and later human activity is highlighted along the way. It is designed to build your understanding of Earth Science and its relevance to our lives to support your teaching related topics in your classroom. Acknowledgments We would like to thank our partners, the individuals who led the tour to share their expertise, build interest in the natural history of the area, and inspire your teaching.
    [Show full text]
  • CDLT Mountain Home & USFS-Boundry Butte Plant List
    CDLT Mountain Home Preserve- Boundary Butte Plant list CDLT Mountain Home & USFS-Boundry Butte Plant list Type Scientific Name Common Name Fern Pteridium aquilinum bracken fern Forb Achillea millefolium common yarrow Forb Agoseris heterophylla annual agoseris Forb Anemone oregana Oregon anemone Forb Antennaria racemosa raceme pussytoes Forb Boechera pauciflorus rockcress (Formerly Arabis) Forb Arnica cordifolia heart-leaf arnica Forb Balsamorhiza sagittata arrowleaf balsamroot Forb Brickellia oblongifolia Mojave brickellbush Forb Cacaliopsis nardosmia silvercrown (Formerly Luina) Forb Calochortus lyallii Lyall's mariposa lily Forb Camassia quamash common camas Forb Castilleja miniata scarlet Indian paintbrush Forb Claytonia lanceolata springbeauty Forb Collinsia parviflora small-flowered blue-eyed mary Forb Commandra umbellata bastard toadflax Forb Delphinium viridescens Wenatchee larkspur Forb Erythronium grandiflorum glacier lily Forb Erysimum species wallflower Forb Fragaria virginiana Virginia strawberry Forb Fritillaria affinis checker lily, chocolate lily Forb Fritillaria pudica yellow bells Forb Galium sp. bedstraw Forb Heuchera cylindrica roundleaf alumroot Forb Hydrophyllum capitatum ballhead waterleaf Forb Lathyrus pauciflorus few-flowered pea Forb Lithophragma parviflorum small-flowered woodland-star Forb Lithophragma glabrum bulbous woodland-star Forb Lithophragma tenellum slender woodland-star Forb Lomatium nudicaule barestem biscuitroot Forb Lomatium triternatum nineleaf biscuitroot Forb Lonicera ciliosa orange honeysuckle
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal to Purchase Land Along the Methow River Would Protect Fish
    Fact Sheet Fact Sheet Fact Sheet Fact Sheet Fact Sheet Fact Sheet Fact Sheet Fact Sheet Fact Sheet Fact Sheet Fact Sheet Fact Sheet BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION Fact Sheet Fact Sheet Habitat ConseRvation – PubliC NotiCe february 2011 Conservancy will own and manage the land. A conservation Proposal to purchase land easement will be placed on the property to permanently along the Methow River protect the land for conservation values. BPA would have Fact Sheet rights of enforcement to the easement. would protect fish habitat Land management: The Methow Conservancy in Okanogan County will lead the development of a baseline assessment and management plan to guide the protection of the land and Location: Winthrop, Okanogan County, Wash. enhancement of the riparian habitat for fish. The management plan will be updated periodically to account 1 Acres: for changes on the property and consider the best Fact Sheet available science. Partners: The Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation and the Methow Conservancy For more information Purpose: The Bonneville Power Administration is Bonneville Power AdministrAtion: proposing to fund the purchase of land in the Methow Jay Marcotte, project manager, 800-622-4519 or River watershed in north-central Washington to protect 503-230-3943, [email protected] fish habitat. This property was chosen to ensure the ongoingFact success of existing riparianSheet protection projects in ConfederAted triBes And BAnds of the Cedarosa area. The Methow Conservancy already has the YAkAmA Nation: conservation easements on 20 nearby properties. The Brandon Rogers, tribal biologist, 509-949-4109, Methow River watershed is important for fish conservation [email protected] because it supports populations of Upper Columbia spring the methow ConservAncy: chinook salmon, Upper Columbia steelhead, and Jeanne White, conservation project manager, Columbia River bull trout, which are all listed as threatened 1-509-996-2870, [email protected] or endangeredFact under the Endangered Sheet Species Act.
    [Show full text]