Dr-Thesis-2015-Alexander-Manuylov

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dr-Thesis-2015-Alexander-Manuylov 5XVVLDQ*UHHNV*UHHN5XVVLDQV 3DUDPHWHUVRI,GHQWLW\ $OH[DQGHU0DQX\ORY Dissertation for the degree of philosophiae doctor (PhD) at the University of Bergen Dissertation date: $XJXVW 2 3 To my dear wife, close friend, and colleague Alexandra Kasyanova and to our children Artemiy and Beata 4 5 Contents Acknowledgements 7 Abstract 8 GeneralIntroduction 11 DiscoursesonGreekidentities 11 GreekEthnicIdentitiesinRussia 13 TheConceptualBasisofPartOne 17 RussianGreeksinGreece 20 ConceptualUnderpinningsofPartTwo 27 FieldworkandMethodologies 31 PARTONE.RUSSIANGREEKS Chapter1 RussianGreekness:AMosaicofPopulationsandDiscourses 34 Introduction:DemographyofEthnicGroupsofGreeksinRussiaand theUSSR 34 GreeksandtheSovietState 55 TheSecondWorldWar 66 ReformsandLiberalizationintheUSSR:TheRiseofGreek Associations 69 GreekEthnicityundertheAttentionofSovietandPostͲSoviet Anthropology 75 Conclusion 86 Chapter2 RepresentationsofPontiannesinaGreekVillageinRussia 89 TheFirstMeeting 89 TheHotel 94 TheVillageandtheGreekSociety 103 RepresentationofHistory 122 6 Conclusion 133 Part2.GREEKRUSSIANS Chapter3 UnͲRepatriatableCapitalsandIdentityCrisis:ExͲSovietÉmigréin GreekSociety 137 Problematization 137 GeorgiosfromGeorgia 140 TheFieldofEducationandtheIssueofEthnicity 145 WeakSymbolicCapitalandItsMigratoryAdvantages 152 Conclusion 155 Chapter4 MigrationofWomenfromRussiatoGreeceasanAppropriationof DiscoursesandPractices 157 AnnaandIrina:LifeinRussia 158 FirstExperienceofLifeinGreece 164 ToBeorNottoBeaGreekWoman 168 ComparingVariantsofAppropriationofGreekness 171 EPILOGUE Chapter5 Conclusions 176 MetamorphosesofGreekidentity 176 ComparisonsofDestinies...VariationsinIdentities... 177 ReasonsforMigration 181 FormationofaNewIdentityDiscourse 182 References 187 7 Acknowledgements I would like to express my gratitude to everyone I met during my fieldwork in Greece and Russia for their hospitality, friendship and help in my research. I also want to say thank you to many colleagues of mine from the Department of Social An- thropology, University of Bergen but first and foremost to my supervisor professor Leif Ole Manger and previous supervisor professor Andrew Lattas. I am very grateful to professor John Chr. Knudsen and his indispensable seminars on text production which were typically filled with discussions, reflec- tions and new ideas. It was impossible to produce even a chapter without useful debates with my colleagues Hege Toje, Samson Abebe, Tord Austdal and many others. I cannot imagine my fieldwork in Athens without the help and support of John Nikolopoulos, director of the Greek Research Foun- dation, expert on Russian-Greek relationships, and my old friend. Thank you very much, Giannis! My fieldwork in Russia and Greece was supported at different times by various organizations, and I would like to express my gratitude to them – the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Founda- tion and, personally, its Moscow Office director Tatiana Zhdanova; the Lauritz Meltzer høyskolefond; the Department of Social Anthropology and the Faculty of Social Sciences of the University of Bergen. 8 Abstract This thesis investigates how the ex-Soviet Greek populations used the reforms in Russia and the re- patriation policy of Greece emerging in the 1990s in order to form a new discourse on Greek identity. This new understanding of the Greek identity was marked by the term “Pontians.” The populations (in a Foucauldian sense) known in Russia and the Soviet Union as Greki, “the Greeks”, were never presented as a unified group nor even as a conglomerate of interacting groups. The new identity discourse that emerged, the discourse on Pontianness, was formed after the Gorbachev perestroika and directed not only towards the Russian Government and the general public in Russia, but also to Greece where many ex-Soviet Greeks found a new “homeland” from the end of the 1980s. In this new, post-Soviet situation, people who in the Soviet Union would be identified as Greeks would now be identified as Russians or Russian Pontians in Greece. People holding this identity gained access to different social (and national) fields in Greece, and were allowed the possibility to cross borders as Schengen/EU citizens who could thus choose their places of work and residence in Europe. Thus, the main argument of my thesis is that the identities of various ex-Soviet Greek populations changed and were homogenized after the perestroika. The new Greek identity “Pontians” changed the status of Greek populations in Russia and was simultaneously accepted in Greece as an identity expressing Greek descent. Geographically, the thesis focuses on the southern territories of the Russian Empire (from southeast Ukraine, Crimea and North Caucasus to Abkhazia, Georgia and the Kars region of contemporary Turkey) and is based on fieldwork undertaken between 2006 and 2011 in Russia and Greece. It is the existence of different historical discourses available in Russia and the Soviet Union for establishing “Greekness” and “Pontianness” that is the focus of the two chapters in Part One. My aim with this overview is to document some discursive facts as they appeared at the crossroads of Greekness and Russianness and to show their “constructedness” and in what ways the construction was linked to prior notions of Greekness. Although my historical discussion argues in favor of mosai- cism and plurality in Greek identities, there was an attempt within the USSR in the 1920-30s towards a unification of discourses on Greekness. This was a result of a general ethnic policy according to which any ethnic group was to have its own ethnic territory. However, when the political situation changed, the process of unification/homogenization stopped to be continued only after perestroika 9 as a grass-root initiative among the Greeks. During this period the mass repatriation of ex-Soviet Greeks to Greece influenced significantly the process of homogenization. Therefore, the formation of the new identity was a discursive process that combined two concerns: 1) to establish a new identity in order to claim autonomy and territory; and 2) to establish a new identity to correspond with the new repatriation criteria in order to be recognized as Greek by the Greek authorities and the popula- tion in Greece. The focus of the Part Two is on the Russian Greeks who have opted to move to Greece. This part of the thesis draws mainly on ethnographic material and interviews of informants collected dur- ing fieldwork in Greece. The new possibilities of Russian Greeks moving to Greece created new con- sequences also for the Greeks back in Russia, and it is an aim to compare the two situations: Greeks or Pontians in Russia and Russian Greeks in Greece. Chapters Three and Four present analyses of the problems repatriates face in Greece. I argue that only a few forms of symbolic capital (for example, matrimonial strategies) are able to be “repatriated” with the migrant, while education and work ex- perience prove more difficult. This difficulty is connected not only with language barriers but also with closeness of social fields, in particular, the field of education in Greece. Herefrom, together with de-skillization and de-classization, a crisis of identity appears that is expressed as nostalgia for Russia. I also characterize two women’s biographies in comparative perspective. Both women migrated from Russia to Greece and were quite successful in their appropriation of Greekness. My main argument here is that the appropriation of Greekness may take place (and be used) in contrasting ways with the causes of those contrasts rooted in pre-emigration experience. The last chapter, Chapter Five, sums up the historicizing and theorizing focuses of the thesis and concludes the argument and findings of the thesis. My main argument is that the identity of Greek migrants from ex-Soviet countries to Greece has not always been based on their common identity (as the Pontians, for example). This is a consequence of the more recent periods of migra- tion. Although being labelled “Greeks” in post-Soviet countries, those labelled also maintained their local identity markers, such as Mariupol’skie Greki, Tsalkintsy, Rumei, Urum, Rum, or Romaikos. The post-perestroika mass migration to Greece introduced to these various populations the understand- ing that they all were “Pontians”, or “Helleno-Pontians”, or “Rousso-Pontians”, depending on the dominating discourses provided by the Soviet and Greek states. Although both states sought to unify identities, such efforts failed in Russia as well as in Greece. Their Greekness in Russia (or Pontianess in Greece) has always been “under construction.” The mosaic character of the discourses on Greek- ness in Russia and corresponding populations is a result of the failure of those state discourses. Ra- ther than a unified state discourse, ethnic identity is connected with issues of citizenship, territory, 10 community, origin, marriage, family, education, and so on. In other words, my argument is that the identity of Greek-migrants may be constructed by state discourses, but that the populations of Greeks only adopt it if they deem it profitable. Now the situation is that for many it is more profitable to be Russian Greeks and to leave Greece for Russia. The thesis is a contribution to the anthropology of migration and takes its place in a line of anthropological research from Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union that explores identity changes and their ways. 11 GENERAL INTRODUCTION Discourses on Greek identities The
Recommended publications
  • Les Premiers Grecs En France : Le Cas De Béziers I/ Rhòde the First Greeks in France: the Case of Beziers I/Rhòde
    Gaia Revue interdisciplinaire sur la Grèce archaïque 22-23 | 2020 Varia Les premiers Grecs en France : le cas de Béziers I/ Rhòde The First Greeks in France: The Case of Beziers I/Rhòde Élian Gomez et Daniela Ugolini Édition électronique URL : http://journals.openedition.org/gaia/901 ISSN : 2275-4776 Éditeur UGA Éditions/Université Grenoble Alpes Édition imprimée ISBN : 978-2-37747-199-7 ISSN : 1287-3349 Référence électronique Élian Gomez et Daniela Ugolini, « Les premiers Grecs en France : le cas de Béziers I/Rhòde », Gaia [En ligne], 22-23 | 2020, mis en ligne le 30 juin 2020, consulté le 17 juillet 2020. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/gaia/901 Ce document a été généré automatiquement le 17 juillet 2020. Gaia. Revue interdisciplinaire sur la Grèce archaïque Les premiers Grecs en France : le cas de Béziers I/Rhòde 1 Les premiers Grecs en France : le cas de Béziers I/Rhòde The First Greeks in France: The Case of Beziers I/Rhòde Élian Gomez et Daniela Ugolini 1. Introduction1 1 À l’échelle historiographique, Béziers I/Rhòde (fig. 1) a émergé récemment dans le cadre de la colonisation ou des diasporas grecques et, jointe à d’autres arguments, donne crédit à la priorité des Rhodiens (ou Doriens) — mentionnée par les sources — dans l’exploration du Nord-Ouest méditerranéen et leur consécutive implantation, que l’exégèse avait réduites à une légende sans valeur historique. Gaia, 22-23 | 2020 Les premiers Grecs en France : le cas de Béziers I/Rhòde 2 Fig. 1. – Localisation de Béziers. Carte de D. Ugolini. 2 L’occupation grecque — inattendue car dans un lieu que, de prime abord, rien ne désignait pour cela — a été identifiée lors de la première opération archéologique d’une certaine ampleur (1985)2 et a suscité surprise et perplexité.
    [Show full text]
  • Catherine the Great and the Development of a Modern Russian Sovereignty, 1762-1796
    Catherine the Great and the Development of a Modern Russian Sovereignty, 1762-1796 By Thomas Lucius Lowish A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Victoria Frede-Montemayor, Chair Professor Jonathan Sheehan Professor Kinch Hoekstra Spring 2021 Abstract Catherine the Great and the Development of a Modern Russian Sovereignty, 1762-1796 by Thomas Lucius Lowish Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Berkeley Professor Victoria Frede-Montemayor, Chair Historians of Russian monarchy have avoided the concept of sovereignty, choosing instead to describe how monarchs sought power, authority, or legitimacy. This dissertation, which centers on Catherine the Great, the empress of Russia between 1762 and 1796, takes on the concept of sovereignty as the exercise of supreme and untrammeled power, considered legitimate, and shows why sovereignty was itself the major desideratum. Sovereignty expressed parity with Western rulers, but it would allow Russian monarchs to bring order to their vast domain and to meaningfully govern the lives of their multitudinous subjects. This dissertation argues that Catherine the Great was a crucial figure in this process. Perceiving the confusion and disorder in how her predecessors exercised power, she recognized that sovereignty required both strong and consistent procedures as well as substantial collaboration with the broadest possible number of stakeholders. This was a modern conception of sovereignty, designed to regulate the swelling mechanisms of the Russian state. Catherine established her system through careful management of both her own activities and the institutions and servitors that she saw as integral to the system.
    [Show full text]
  • And Christos Zacharakis (PPE-DE)To the Commission (30 November 2001)
    26.9.2002 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 229 E/13 (2002/C 229 E/011) WRITTEN QUESTION E-3321/01 by Stavros Xarchakos (PPE-DE)and Christos Zacharakis (PPE-DE)to the Commission (30 November 2001) Subject: Targeted demolition of buildings belonging to Greeks in Albania According to complaints by the Greek community of Cheimarra on 22 November 2001 the selective demolition of buildings and homes belonging to members of the internationally recognised Greek ethnic minority of southern Albania is scheduled to commence. The buildings concerned are properties returned to their rightful owners by the local authorities immediately following the fall of Hoxha’s communist regime and include houses, taverns, cafes and offices belonging to Greek organisations together with a Greek language tuition centre. The new mayor of Cheimarra, who belongs to the Socialist party, sent fifteen selective letters of notification of demolition to members of the Greek ethnic minority on the grounds that the buildings concerned, which have been standing for many years and were returned to their rightful owners following revocation of the provisions confiscating them decreed by the previous Communist regime were unauthorised. What view does the Commission take of this? Are such racist tactics by the Albanian authorities against ethnic Greeks in Albania consistent with officially accepted principles in the EU Member States? What immediate measures can be taken to halt the measures thus decided and end the persecution by the Albania of members of the ethnic Greek minority which is recognised not only internationally but also by Albania itself? Reply given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission (22 January 2002) The Commission is not aware of the selective demolition of buildings and homes belonging to the ethnic Greek minority in Albania.
    [Show full text]
  • How Greek Were the Greeks of Corsica? Nick Nicholas, Research Fellow, French, Italian & Spanish Dept, University of Melbourne [email protected]
    1 How Greek were the Greeks of Corsica? Nick Nicholas, Research Fellow, French, Italian & Spanish Dept, University of Melbourne [email protected] 1. Potted History Et les Gennois disent qu’il faudroit que la Barbarie des Magnottes fust bien grande, si celle des Corses n’estoit capable d’y mettre un contre-poids. Il est certain que si par le cours des affaires ce dernier Traitté vient à réüssir, jamais aucune alliance de Nation n’a esté mieux assortie. Leurs Marriages communs doivent produire des enfans, qui seront autant de Chefs-d’œuvres de ferocité. (La Guilletière 1675) • Mani in Peloponnese: chronic resistance to central authority. • After fall of Crete to Ottomans in 1669, fears Ottomans would turn to Mani; Venetian protection no longer effective. • Several waves of migration: Brindisi, Puglia, Tuscany. • Genoa allows colony in Corsica, with intent of pacifying the locals. • 1500 set out; 500 get there in 1676; settle in abandoned village of Paomia. • Violent confrontations with Corsicans after first couple of years. • Long-running confrontations with Catholic authorities over the requirement that they adopt (Greek rite) Catholicism. • Crisis in 1694 over Gregorian calendar; 1715 over Orthodox church books. • 1729: Corsican insurrection. 1731: Greeks chased out of Paomia. • Greeks move to Ajaccio, where they serve as the city guard. 20% of the population, well-connected, and armed. 2 • 1745: Vendetta with surrounding villagers unplanned by Genoa; Genoa stops paying Greek soldiers. • 1752: One party of Greeks forms abortive colony in Sardinia. • Other Greco-Corsicans leave for Leghorn, Minorca, Florida, or are in negotiations with Tuscany and Spain.
    [Show full text]
  • Advisory Committee on the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities
    ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES ACFC/OP/IV(2019)003 Fourth Opinion on Poland - adopted on 6 November 2019 Summary Persons belonging to national minorities in Poland continue to enjoy legal protection of their rights guaranteed under the Framework Convention and a fair level of financial support in the areas of culture, media and education. Few legislative changes have occurred since the previous monitoring cycle which would affect national minorities directly. A set of amendments to the Act on National and Ethnic Minorities and on the Regional Language, aimed at improving a number of gaps was approved by the Sejm in 2015 but ultimately not signed into law by the President. Three further attempts were made for the recognition of Silesians and the Silesian language, but to no avail. The Programme for the Integration of the Roma Community in Poland 2014-2020 has led to tangible improvements. This concerns in particular the area of education, where rates of early dropouts and Roma children in special education were reduced, not least through the work of over 90 Roma assistants employed in schools. Problems continue to persist in attendance of preschools and the transition to secondary education. Discrimination against Roma in the labour market and the housing sector is still widespread and more should be done to combat anti-Gypsyism in society. Whilst the authorities undertake efforts to promote tolerance and understanding, developments during this monitoring cycle suggest a persistent if not worsening climate of intolerance, racism and xenophobia. This concerns often the Jewish and Roma minorities, but increasingly also persons belonging to the Ukrainian minority and migrants from Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • Albanian Borders at the Margins of Europe Gilles De Rapper
    The High Wall and the Narrow Gate: Albanian Borders at the Margins of Europe Gilles de Rapper To cite this version: Gilles de Rapper. The High Wall and the Narrow Gate: Albanian Borders at the Margins of Eu- rope. 10th biennial EASA conference, ”Experiencing diversity and mutuality”, Aug 2008, Ljubljana, Slovenia. halshs-00343516 HAL Id: halshs-00343516 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00343516 Submitted on 1 Dec 2008 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Paper presented at the 10th biennial EASA conference, Experiencing diversity and mutuality, Ljubljana, 26-29 August, 2008 (Workshop 047, “The New Europe: The Politics of Recognition, Inclusion and Exclusion”). THE HIGH WALL AND THE NARROW GATE: ALBANIAN BORDERS AT THE MARGINS OF EUROPE Gilles de Rapper My paper is an attempt to understand the impact of changes in the borderland between Greece and Albanian after 1991. More precisely, I would like to relate the recent success of some “ideas” about the ancient past of the area with the state of social relations between Albanians and Greeks as experienced by local inhabitants of the borderland. Established in 1913 as a boundary between two national states, the Greek-Albanian border came to separate two geopolitical camps during the Cold War and became an external border of Europe in 1981 when Greece joined the European Community.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eastern Orthodox Church in New Zealand
    THE EASTERN ORTHODOX CHURCH IN NEW ZEALAND A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requ i r·ements for 'the Degree of Master of Arts in Religious Studies in the University of Canterbury by S .A. Threadgi 11 University of Canterbury April 1987 I l ',; ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I iJ \ I express thanks to Mr. Colin Brown for his excellent su~ervision and constant encouragement; Mr. C. Goodrich for his assistance in designing the Interview Schedules; the staff of the Anglican Diocesan Church Offices in Wellington, Christchurch and Dunedin; the librarian of the College .of Saint John the Evangelist, Auckland; the staff of National Archives, Department of Internal Affairs, Wellington; the staff of the National Council of Churches, Christchurch, for allowing me access to their files; Archbishop Dionysios, Fr. Speranta, Fr's Ambrose and Nicholi, Fr. Witbrock, and all the Orthodox laity who were either interviewed or informally spoken with. Thanks also to: Miss Lucia Randall for her help with typing and statistics and Mrs. Glenys Lamb for typing the final draft. Finally and most important, thanks to my mother Annie Sheridan, without whose support this thesis would not have been completed. TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS i i. TABLE OF CONTENTS i i; ABSTRACT v INTRODUCTION 1 1 HISTORY 5 1. Foundation 5 2. Schism 6 3. Occupation: East/West Relations (1453-1800) 7 4. 19th Century Nationalism 10 2 THE JURISDICTIONS 14 1. Introduction 14 2. The Ecumenical Patriarchte 16 3, The Greek Orthodox Church 18 4. The Romanian Orthodox Church 21 5. The Serbian Orthodox Church 24 6.
    [Show full text]
  • The Production of Lexical Tone in Croatian
    The production of lexical tone in Croatian Inauguraldissertation zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors der Philosophie im Fachbereich Sprach- und Kulturwissenschaften der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität zu Frankfurt am Main vorgelegt von Jevgenij Zintchenko Jurlina aus Kiew 2018 (Einreichungsjahr) 2019 (Erscheinungsjahr) 1. Gutacher: Prof. Dr. Henning Reetz 2. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Sven Grawunder Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 01.11.2018 ABSTRACT Jevgenij Zintchenko Jurlina: The production of lexical tone in Croatian (Under the direction of Prof. Dr. Henning Reetz and Prof. Dr. Sven Grawunder) This dissertation is an investigation of pitch accent, or lexical tone, in standard Croatian. The first chapter presents an in-depth overview of the history of the Croatian language, its relationship to Serbo-Croatian, its dialect groups and pronunciation variants, and general phonology. The second chapter explains the difference between various types of prosodic prominence and describes systems of pitch accent in various languages from different parts of the world: Yucatec Maya, Lithuanian and Limburgian. Following is a detailed account of the history of tone in Serbo-Croatian and Croatian, the specifics of its tonal system, intonational phonology and finally, a review of the most prominent phonetic investigations of tone in that language. The focal point of this dissertation is a production experiment, in which ten native speakers of Croatian from the region of Slavonia were recorded. The material recorded included a diverse selection of monosyllabic, bisyllabic, trisyllabic and quadrisyllabic words, containing all four accents of standard Croatian: short falling, long falling, short rising and long rising. Each target word was spoken in initial, medial and final positions of natural Croatian sentences.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Museums Visit More Than 80 Million Visitors, 1/3 of Who Are Visitors Under 18
    Moscow 4 There are more than 3000 museums (and about 72 000 museum workers) in Russian Moscow region 92 Federation, not including school and company museums. Every year Russian museums visit more than 80 million visitors, 1/3 of who are visitors under 18 There are about 650 individual and institutional members in ICOM Russia. During two last St. Petersburg 117 years ICOM Russia membership was rapidly increasing more than 20% (or about 100 new members) a year Northwestern region 160 You will find the information aboutICOM Russia members in this book. All members (individual and institutional) are divided in two big groups – Museums which are institutional members of ICOM or are represented by individual members and Organizations. All the museums in this book are distributed by regional principle. Organizations are structured in profile groups Central region 192 Volga river region 224 Many thanks to all the museums who offered their help and assistance in the making of this collection South of Russia 258 Special thanks to Urals 270 Museum creation and consulting Culture heritage security in Russia with 3M(tm)Novec(tm)1230 Siberia and Far East 284 © ICOM Russia, 2012 Organizations 322 © K. Novokhatko, A. Gnedovsky, N. Kazantseva, O. Guzewska – compiling, translation, editing, 2012 [email protected] www.icom.org.ru © Leo Tolstoy museum-estate “Yasnaya Polyana”, design, 2012 Moscow MOSCOW A. N. SCRiAbiN MEMORiAl Capital of Russia. Major political, economic, cultural, scientific, religious, financial, educational, and transportation center of Russia and the continent MUSEUM Highlights: First reference to Moscow dates from 1147 when Moscow was already a pretty big town.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Alexander Kitroeff Curriculum Vitae – May 2019 Current Position: Professor, History Department, Haverford College Educa
    Alexander Kitroeff Curriculum Vitae – May 2019 History Department, Haverford College, 370 Lancaster Avenue, Haverford PA, 19041 Mobile phone: 610-864-0567 e-mail: [email protected] Current Position: Professor, History Department, Haverford College Education: D.Phil. Modern History, Oxford University 1984 M.A. History, University of Keele 1979 B.A. Politics, University of Warwick 1977 Research Interests: Identity in Greece & its Diaspora from politics to sport Teaching Fields: Nationalism & ethnicity in Modern Europe, Mediterranean, & Modern Greece C19-20th Professional Experience: Professor, Haverford College 2019-present Visiting Professor, College Year in Athens, Spring 2018 Visiting Professor, American College of Greece, 2017-18 Associate Professor, History Dept., Haverford College, 2002-2019 Assistant Professor, History Dept., Haverford College, 1996-2002 Assistant Professor, History Dept. & Onassis Center, New York University, 1990-96 Adjunct Assistant Professor, History Department, Temple University, 1989-90 Visiting Lecturer, History Dept., & Hellenic Studies, Princeton University, Fall 1988 Adj. Asst. Professor, Byz. & Modern Greek Studies, Queens College CUNY, 1986-89 Fellowships & Visiting Positions: Venizelos Chair Modern Greek Studies, The American College in Greece 2011-12 Research Fellow, Center for Byz. & Mod. Greek Studies, Queens College CUNY 2004 Visiting Scholar, Vryonis Center for the Study of Hellenism, Sacramento, Spring 1994 Senior Visiting Member, St Antony’s College, Oxford University, Trinity 1991 Major Research Awards & Grants: Selected as “12 Great Greek Minds at Foreign Universities” by News in Greece 2016 Jaharis Family Foundation, 2013-15 The Stavros S. Niarchos Foundation, 2012 Immigrant Learning Center, 2011 Bank of Piraeus Cultural Foundation, 2008 Proteus Foundation, 2008 Center for Neo-Hellenic Studies, Hellenic Research Institute, 2003 1 President Gerald R.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Report Submitted by the Russian Federation Pursuant to The
    ACFC/SR/II(2005)003 SECOND REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 25, PARAGRAPH 2 OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES (Received on 26 April 2005) MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION REPORT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PROVISIONS OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Report of the Russian Federation on the progress of the second cycle of monitoring in accordance with Article 25 of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities MOSCOW, 2005 2 Table of contents PREAMBLE ..............................................................................................................................4 1. Introduction........................................................................................................................4 2. The legislation of the Russian Federation for the protection of national minorities rights5 3. Major lines of implementation of the law of the Russian Federation and the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities .............................................................15 3.1. National territorial subdivisions...................................................................................15 3.2 Public associations – national cultural autonomies and national public organizations17 3.3 National minorities in the system of federal government............................................18 3.4 Development of Ethnic Communities’ National
    [Show full text]
  • 1Daskalov R Tchavdar M Ed En
    Entangled Histories of the Balkans Balkan Studies Library Editor-in-Chief Zoran Milutinović, University College London Editorial Board Gordon N. Bardos, Columbia University Alex Drace-Francis, University of Amsterdam Jasna Dragović-Soso, Goldsmiths, University of London Christian Voss, Humboldt University, Berlin Advisory Board Marie-Janine Calic, University of Munich Lenard J. Cohen, Simon Fraser University Radmila Gorup, Columbia University Robert M. Hayden, University of Pittsburgh Robert Hodel, Hamburg University Anna Krasteva, New Bulgarian University Galin Tihanov, Queen Mary, University of London Maria Todorova, University of Illinois Andrew Wachtel, Northwestern University VOLUME 9 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/bsl Entangled Histories of the Balkans Volume One: National Ideologies and Language Policies Edited by Roumen Daskalov and Tchavdar Marinov LEIDEN • BOSTON 2013 Cover Illustration: Top left: Krste Misirkov (1874–1926), philologist and publicist, founder of Macedo- nian national ideology and the Macedonian standard language. Photographer unknown. Top right: Rigas Feraios (1757–1798), Greek political thinker and revolutionary, ideologist of the Greek Enlightenment. Portrait by Andreas Kriezis (1816–1880), Benaki Museum, Athens. Bottom left: Vuk Karadžić (1787–1864), philologist, ethnographer and linguist, reformer of the Serbian language and founder of Serbo-Croatian. 1865, lithography by Josef Kriehuber. Bottom right: Şemseddin Sami Frashëri (1850–1904), Albanian writer and scholar, ideologist of Albanian and of modern Turkish nationalism, with his wife Emine. Photo around 1900, photo- grapher unknown. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Entangled histories of the Balkans / edited by Roumen Daskalov and Tchavdar Marinov. pages cm — (Balkan studies library ; Volume 9) Includes bibliographical references and index.
    [Show full text]