DIRECTORY WORLD AIRLINES Fleet Data from Flight ACAS Database F Lightglobal.Comlacas
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
JANUARY European Parliament Vote on Airport Charges (15 January)
REVIEW www.airtransportnews.aero JANUARY European Parliament vote on airport charges (15 January) he European Parliament concluded its first reading on a proposed Directive on airport charges, initially the Directive will only incentivise conflicts between airlines and airports, resulting in uncertainty over infra - adopted by the European Commission a year ago. ACI EUROPE is appreciative of the European Parlia - structure investments and potentially delaying much needed capacity development. Olivier Jankovec added: T ment’s work to improve the proposal of the European Commission, but considers that serious concerns "That the Directive is silent on the need for airports to be incentivised to invest in time for the new facilities regarding fundamental issues remain. These include risking costly and damaging over-regulation as well as com - to match demand, is puzzling. It shows that the Directive not only remains imbalanced in favour of airlines but promising the ability of European airports to finance much needed infrastructure and capacity development. also fails to reflect that the interests of the airlines and that of the travelling public are not the same." Whilst the European Commission proposed to apply the Directive to all airports with more than 1 million pas - Responding to the vote of the European Parliament on Airport Charges, IACA is extremely disappointed that an sengers per year, the European Parliament increased this figure to 5 million, leaving States still free to apply opportunity to address the unbalanced relationship between the fully deregulated airline sector and their mo - the Directive to airports below this threshold. As most European airports now operate in a highly competitive nopolistic service provider (airports) has been missed. -
My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable
- www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk - The EGXWinfo Group of Twitter Accounts - @EGXWinfoGroup on Twitter - My Personal Callsign List This list was not designed for publication however due to several requests I have decided to make it downloadable. It is a mixture of listed callsigns and logged callsigns so some have numbers after the callsign as they were heard. Use CTL+F in Adobe Reader to search for your callsign Callsign ICAO/PRI IATA Unit Type Based Country Type ABG AAB W9 Abelag Aviation Belgium Civil ARMYAIR AAC Army Air Corps United Kingdom Civil AgustaWestland Lynx AH.9A/AW159 Wildcat ARMYAIR 200# AAC 2Regt | AAC AH.1 AAC Middle Wallop United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 300# AAC 3Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 400# AAC 4Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 500# AAC 5Regt AAC/RAF Britten-Norman Islander/Defender JHCFS Aldergrove United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 600# AAC 657Sqn | JSFAW | AAC Various RAF Odiham United Kingdom Military Ambassador AAD Mann Air Ltd United Kingdom Civil AIGLE AZUR AAF ZI Aigle Azur France Civil ATLANTIC AAG KI Air Atlantique United Kingdom Civil ATLANTIC AAG Atlantic Flight Training United Kingdom Civil ALOHA AAH KH Aloha Air Cargo United States Civil BOREALIS AAI Air Aurora United States Civil ALFA SUDAN AAJ Alfa Airlines Sudan Civil ALASKA ISLAND AAK Alaska Island Air United States Civil AMERICAN AAL AA American Airlines United States Civil AM CORP AAM Aviation Management Corporation United States Civil -
Appendix 25 Box 31/3 Airline Codes
March 2021 APPENDIX 25 BOX 31/3 AIRLINE CODES The information in this document is provided as a guide only and is not professional advice, including legal advice. It should not be assumed that the guidance is comprehensive or that it provides a definitive answer in every case. Appendix 25 - SAD Box 31/3 Airline Codes March 2021 Airline code Code description 000 ANTONOV DESIGN BUREAU 001 AMERICAN AIRLINES 005 CONTINENTAL AIRLINES 006 DELTA AIR LINES 012 NORTHWEST AIRLINES 014 AIR CANADA 015 TRANS WORLD AIRLINES 016 UNITED AIRLINES 018 CANADIAN AIRLINES INT 020 LUFTHANSA 023 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. (CARGO) 027 ALASKA AIRLINES 029 LINEAS AER DEL CARIBE (CARGO) 034 MILLON AIR (CARGO) 037 USAIR 042 VARIG BRAZILIAN AIRLINES 043 DRAGONAIR 044 AEROLINEAS ARGENTINAS 045 LAN-CHILE 046 LAV LINEA AERO VENEZOLANA 047 TAP AIR PORTUGAL 048 CYPRUS AIRWAYS 049 CRUZEIRO DO SUL 050 OLYMPIC AIRWAYS 051 LLOYD AEREO BOLIVIANO 053 AER LINGUS 055 ALITALIA 056 CYPRUS TURKISH AIRLINES 057 AIR FRANCE 058 INDIAN AIRLINES 060 FLIGHT WEST AIRLINES 061 AIR SEYCHELLES 062 DAN-AIR SERVICES 063 AIR CALEDONIE INTERNATIONAL 064 CSA CZECHOSLOVAK AIRLINES 065 SAUDI ARABIAN 066 NORONTAIR 067 AIR MOOREA 068 LAM-LINHAS AEREAS MOCAMBIQUE Page 2 of 19 Appendix 25 - SAD Box 31/3 Airline Codes March 2021 Airline code Code description 069 LAPA 070 SYRIAN ARAB AIRLINES 071 ETHIOPIAN AIRLINES 072 GULF AIR 073 IRAQI AIRWAYS 074 KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES 075 IBERIA 076 MIDDLE EAST AIRLINES 077 EGYPTAIR 078 AERO CALIFORNIA 079 PHILIPPINE AIRLINES 080 LOT POLISH AIRLINES 081 QANTAS AIRWAYS -
深圳市华迅贸易有限公司 Shenzhen Huaxun Trading Co., Ltd
深圳市华迅贸易有限公司 Shenzhen Huaxun Trading Co., Ltd. 地址：深圳市福田区车公庙泰然九路海松大厦 A 座 1602 室 邮编：518040 电话：0755-23981008 传真：0755-82734068 Email:[email protected] 深圳市华迅贸易有限公司(以下简称“华迅”)自 2001 年成立伊始，就致力向中国航空工业提供高品质的航空化工产品和消耗材料， 经过多年来的努力和本着“诚信、专业、变革、进取”的宗旨，目前已与东航、南航、海航、深圳航空、上海航空、四川航空、山东 航空、厦门航空、中国货运航空、春秋航空、吉祥航空、上海国际货运航空、扬子江快运、东星航空、华夏航空、中国联合航空、 东海航空、通用航空等航空公司和北京飞机维修工程有限公司、广州飞机维修工程有限公司、上海科技宇航、上海波音航空改装维 修工程有限公司、上海东联、珠海摩天宇、四川斯奈克玛、厦门豪富太古飞机工程有限公司等飞机维修公司及中国民航飞行学院、 深圳鲲鹏国际飞行学院等飞行院校保持着良好的业务往来。 Since established in Jan 2001, Shenzhen Huaxun Trading Co., Ltd. (hereinafter called “Huaxun” for short) has applied herself to supply high-quality products and consumables for Chinese aviation industry. After making great efforts for many years and carrying out the tenet of “honesty , professionalism, innovation and enterprise”, Huaxun has become a qualified and dependable partner of domestic airlines such as China Eastern Airlines, China Southern Airlines, Hainan Airlines, Shenzhen Airlines, Shanghai Airlines, Sichuan Airlines, Shandong Airlines, Xiamen Airlines, China Cargo Airlines, Spring Airlines, Juneyao Airlines, Shanghai Airlines Cargo Intl, Yangtze River Express Airlines, East Star Airlines , China Express Airlines, China United Airlines, Donghai Airlines, General Airlines as well as aviation maintenance corporations such as AMECO, GAMECO, STARCO, BSAS, CEASA, MTU Maintenance Zhuhai, SSAMC, Goodrich TAECO and some civil aviation colleges as CAFUC, Shenzhen Kunpeng International Flight College etc. 华迅作为航化产品经销商，经营产品范围涵盖了润滑油、润滑脂、液压油、清洗剂、防腐剂、除锈剂、胶粘剂、密封胶、胶 带、油漆、无损探伤、复合材料、表面处理产品等。目前全球合作伙伴主要有埃克森美孚, 首诺, 壳牌, 汉高, LPS, 3M, ANDEROL, DOWCORNING, PPG, GE, ZIP-CHEM, ACHESON, HUNTSMAN, WD-40, HEXCEL, CYTEC, AKZONOBEL, ORCON, MILLER-STEPHENSON, MCGEAN-ROHCO, PERMACEL, BOSTIK 等。 As a domestic supplier of aviation chemicals, Huaxun’s products cover aviation lubricants, greases, hydraulic fluids, cleaners, anti-corrosions, anti-rusts, adhesives, sealants, tapes, paints, NDT, composite materials and surface treatment products etc. -
Punctuality Statistics Economic Regulation Group Aviation Data Unit
Punctuality Statistics Economic Regulation Group Aviation Data Unit Birmingham, Edinburgh, Gatwick, Glasgow, Heathrow, London City, Luton, Manchester, Newcastle, Stansted Full and Summary Analysis July 2006 Disclaimer The information contained in this report will be compiled from various sources and it will not be possible for the CAA to check and verify whether it is accurate and correct nor does the CAA undertake to do so. Consequently the CAA cannot accept any liability for any financial loss caused by the persons reliance on it. Contents Foreword Introductory Notes Full Analysis – By Reporting Airport Birmingham Edinburgh Gatwick Glasgow Heathrow London City Luton Manchester Newcastle Stansted Full Analysis With Arrival / Departure Split – By A Origin / Destination Airport B C – E F – H I – L M – N O – P Q – S T – U V – Z Summary Analysis FOREWORD 1 CONTENT 1.1 Punctuality Statistics: Heathrow, Gatwick, Manchester, Glasgow, Birmingham, Luton, Stansted, Edinburgh, Newcastle and London City - Full and Summary Analysis is prepared by the Civil Aviation Authority with the co-operation of the airport operators and Airport Coordination Ltd. Their assistance is gratefully acknowledged. 2 ENQUIRIES 2.1 Statistics Enquiries concerning the information in this publication and distribution enquiries concerning orders and subscriptions should be addressed to: Civil Aviation Authority Room K4 G3 Aviation Data Unit CAA House 45/59 Kingsway London WC2B 6TE Tel. 020-7453-6258 or 020-7453-6252 or email [email protected] 2.2 Enquiries concerning further analysis of punctuality or other UK civil aviation statistics should be addressed to: Tel: 020-7453-6258 or 020-7453-6252 or email [email protected] Please note that we are unable to publish statistics or provide ad hoc data extracts at lower than monthly aggregate level. -
Punctuality Statistics Economic Regulation Group Aviation Data Unit
Punctuality Statistics Economic Regulation Group Aviation Data Unit Birmingham, Gatwick, Glasgow, Heathrow, Luton, Manchester, Stansted Full and Summary Analysis June 1995 Disclaimer The information contained in this report will be compiled from various sources and it will not be possible for the CAA to check and verify whether it is accurate and correct nor does the CAA undertake to do so. Consequently the CAA cannot accept any liability for any financial loss caused by the persons reliance on it. Contents Foreword Introductory Notes Full Analysis – By Reporting Airport Birmingham Edinburgh Gatwick Glasgow Heathrow London City Luton Manchester Newcastle Stansted Full Analysis With Arrival / Departure Split – By A Origin / Destination Airport B C – E F – H I – L M – N O – P Q – S T – U V – Z Summary Analysis FOREWORD 1 CONTENT 1.1 Punctuality Statistics: Heathrow, Gatwick, Manchester, Glasgow, Birmingham, Luton, Stansted, Edinburgh, Newcastle and London City - Full and Summary Analysis is prepared by the Civil Aviation Authority with the co-operation of the airport operators and Airport Coordination Ltd. Their assistance is gratefully acknowledged. 2 ENQUIRIES 2.1 Statistics Enquiries concerning the information in this publication and distribution enquiries concerning orders and subscriptions should be addressed to: Civil Aviation Authority Room K4 G3 Aviation Data Unit CAA House 45/59 Kingsway London WC2B 6TE Tel. 020-7453-6258 or 020-7453-6252 or email [email protected] 2.2 Enquiries concerning further analysis of punctuality or other UK civil aviation statistics should be addressed to: Tel: 020-7453-6258 or 020-7453-6252 or email [email protected] Please note that we are unable to publish statistics or provide ad hoc data extracts at lower than monthly aggregate level. -
The Evolution of Chinese Bankruptcy Law: Challenges of a Growing Practice Area
The Evolution of Chinese Bankruptcy Law: Challenges of a Growing Practice Area Richard C. Pedone Partner Nixon Peabody LLP Henry H. Liu Partner DLA Piper LLP (U.S.) Bankruptcy Cases in China During 2009, approximately 2,900 bankruptcy cases were filed in China, which is down from 3,139 in 2008 and 3,810 in 2007.1 The number of bankruptcy filings in China is relatively low compared to the U.S., where, for example, in March 2009 alone, 8,162 business cases were filed.2 Rarity of Bankruptcy Cases in China and Explanations Therefore Some commentators have posited a number of theories for the relative rarity of bankruptcy cases, including the significant impact of local governments in deciding whether a business should enter bankruptcy and the incentives of not allowing companies to enter into bankruptcy.3 Brief History of Bankruptcy Practice in China. China has a relative short bankruptcy practice history. A bankruptcy law was first introduced in China in 1906, during the last years of the Qing Dynasty, which met its demise in 1911. Bankruptcy laws were later issued in 1915 and 1935 during the Republic of China period, which ended in 1949 when the People’s Republic of China was founded. For more than thirty years after 1949, there was no bankruptcy system in practice. In 1986, the first bankruptcy law for state-owned enterprises was promulgated. Bankruptcy and insolvency for private companies and foreign-invested companies continued to be governed by separate laws. The Enterprise Bankruptcy Law (EBL), which is more broadly applicable, became effective in 2007. -
Airlines Codes
Airlines codes Sorted by Airlines Sorted by Code Airline Code Airline Code Aces VX Deutsche Bahn AG 2A Action Airlines XQ Aerocondor Trans Aereos 2B Acvilla Air WZ Denim Air 2D ADA Air ZY Ireland Airways 2E Adria Airways JP Frontier Flying Service 2F Aea International Pte 7X Debonair Airways 2G AER Lingus Limited EI European Airlines 2H Aero Asia International E4 Air Burkina 2J Aero California JR Kitty Hawk Airlines Inc 2K Aero Continente N6 Karlog Air 2L Aero Costa Rica Acori ML Moldavian Airlines 2M Aero Lineas Sosa P4 Haiti Aviation 2N Aero Lloyd Flugreisen YP Air Philippines Corp 2P Aero Service 5R Millenium Air Corp 2Q Aero Services Executive W4 Island Express 2S Aero Zambia Z9 Canada Three Thousand 2T Aerocaribe QA Western Pacific Air 2U Aerocondor Trans Aereos 2B Amtrak 2V Aeroejecutivo SA de CV SX Pacific Midland Airlines 2W Aeroflot Russian SU Helenair Corporation Ltd 2Y Aeroleasing SA FP Changan Airlines 2Z Aeroline Gmbh 7E Mafira Air 3A Aerolineas Argentinas AR Avior 3B Aerolineas Dominicanas YU Corporate Express Airline 3C Aerolineas Internacional N2 Palair Macedonian Air 3D Aerolineas Paraguayas A8 Northwestern Air Lease 3E Aerolineas Santo Domingo EX Air Inuit Ltd 3H Aeromar Airlines VW Air Alliance 3J Aeromexico AM Tatonduk Flying Service 3K Aeromexpress QO Gulfstream International 3M Aeronautica de Cancun RE Air Urga 3N Aeroperlas WL Georgian Airlines 3P Aeroperu PL China Yunnan Airlines 3Q Aeropostal Alas VH Avia Air Nv 3R Aerorepublica P5 Shuswap Air 3S Aerosanta Airlines UJ Turan Air Airline Company 3T Aeroservicios -
Low Cost Carrier Competition and Route Entry in an Emerging but Regulated Aviation Market
Low Cost Carrier Competition and Route Entry in an Emerging but Regulated Aviation Market - the Case of China XIAOWEN FU Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies The University of Sydney E-mail: [email protected] ZHENG LEI* Centre for Aviation Research University of Surrey *Corresponding Author, E-mail: [email protected] KUN WANG Sauder School of Business University of British Columbia E-mail: [email protected] JIA YAN School of Economics Sciences Washington State University E-mail: [email protected] Acknowledgements: We would like to thank helpful comments provided by three anonymous referees, the editor of the special issue, and participants of the 17th ATRS (Air Transport Research Society) conference held in Bergamo, Italy. Financial supports from the University of Sydney Business School (General Research Grant) are gratefully acknowledged. All remaining errors are ours. 1 Low Cost Carrier Competition and Route Entry in an Emerging but Regulated Aviation Market - the Case of China Abstract Although China lags behind other liberalized aviation markets in low cost carrier (LCC) development, its largest LCC, Spring Airlines, has achieved rapid growth in traffic volume and revenue, as well as consistent profitability, since its inauguration in 2005. Our empirical study on the Chinese domestic market suggests that Spring adopts a “cream skimming” strategy to enter high-priced routes, allowing the carrier to achieve both a very high load factor and considerable profitability. Spring’s capacity and market share on individual routes are constrained to low levels, likely due to government regulation and/or a “puppy dog” strategy adopted by the carrier. -
INTERNATIONAL WOMEN PILOTS MAGAZINE*’ (ISSN 1548-565X) 99 NEWS INTERNATIONAL Published by the NINETY-NINES* INC
INTERNATIONAL 99 NEWS WOMEN PILOTS OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE N I N ETY- NINES® INC "OONEY November/December 2004 PERPETUAL CALENDAR 2004 JULY 1 -3 NW Section Meeting, Spokane WA. DECEMBER 6-10 EAA Fly-In, Arlington, WA. 5 Mr. and Mrs. Santa Claus Fly-In, MAPS Air Museum, Akron/Canton (CAK) 26- EAA, Oshkosh, Wl. Regional Airport. Contact Patricia Synk, Aug. 1 330-945-7518, [email protected]. To list your 99s events on this calendar page, 9-12 Sun 'n Fun High Flying Holidays. Fami AUGUST lies will enjoy holiday/aviation themed send information to: 1 99 News Deadline - September/October activities. Contact: Phone 863-644-2431 issue. The 99 News or [email protected]. P.O. Box 950033 10-12 WAI, Dallas, TX. 20 Deadline for Professional Pilot Leader Oklahoma City, OK ship Initiative (PPLI) Applications. Con 21-26 International 73195 tact Laura Smith, PPLI Program Leader, at C o n fere n ce in New Zealand. Fun Em ail: [email protected] or www. n i nety-n i nes.org/careers/mentori ng. htm I. and Fellowship articles99News(<l'cs.com Down Under. Pre- 31 Deadline for submission of Bylaws and/ and Post-Confer Online Form: or Standing Rules amendments. Send to ence tours of North www.ninety-nines.org/ Jerry Anne Jurenka, Intl. Bylaws/Standing and South Island 99newsreports.html Rules Chair, 10 Oak Forest Drive, are available. For Longview, TX 75605, USA. Fax 903-663- additional informa Please indicate the 5808; email [email protected]. tion go to name and location www.ninety- of the event, the nines.org. -
Frontier Politics and Sino-Soviet Relations: a Study of Northwestern Xinjiang, 1949-1963
University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 Frontier Politics And Sino-Soviet Relations: A Study Of Northwestern Xinjiang, 1949-1963 Sheng Mao University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Mao, Sheng, "Frontier Politics And Sino-Soviet Relations: A Study Of Northwestern Xinjiang, 1949-1963" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2459. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2459 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2459 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Frontier Politics And Sino-Soviet Relations: A Study Of Northwestern Xinjiang, 1949-1963 Abstract This is an ethnopolitical and diplomatic study of the Three Districts, or the former East Turkestan Republic, in China’s northwest frontier in the 1950s and 1960s. It describes how this Muslim borderland between Central Asia and China became today’s Yili Kazakh Autonomous Prefecture under the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region. The Three Districts had been in the Soviet sphere of influence since the 1930s and remained so even after the Chinese Communist takeover in October 1949. After the Sino- Soviet split in the late 1950s, Beijing transformed a fragile suzerainty into full sovereignty over this region: the transitional population in Xinjiang was demarcated, border defenses were established, and Soviet consulates were forced to withdraw. As a result, the Three Districts changed from a Soviet frontier to a Chinese one, and Xinjiang’s outward focus moved from Soviet Central Asia to China proper. The largely peaceful integration of Xinjiang into PRC China stands in stark contrast to what occurred in Outer Mongolia and Tibet. -
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT Southern District of New York *SUBJECT to GENERAL and SPECIFIC NOTES to THESE SCHEDULES* SUMMARY
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT Southern District of New York Refco Capital Markets, LTD Case Number: 05-60018 *SUBJECT TO GENERAL AND SPECIFIC NOTES TO THESE SCHEDULES* SUMMARY OF AMENDED SCHEDULES An asterisk (*) found in schedules herein indicates a change from the Debtor's original Schedules of Assets and Liabilities filed December 30, 2005. Any such change will also be indicated in the "Amended" column of the summary schedules with an "X". Indicate as to each schedule whether that schedule is attached and state the number of pages in each. Report the totals from Schedules A, B, C, D, E, F, I, and J in the boxes provided. Add the amounts from Schedules A and B to determine the total amount of the debtor's assets. Add the amounts from Schedules D, E, and F to determine the total amount of the debtor's liabilities. AMOUNTS SCHEDULED NAME OF SCHEDULE ATTACHED NO. OF SHEETS ASSETS LIABILITIES OTHER YES / NO A - REAL PROPERTY NO 0 $0 B - PERSONAL PROPERTY YES 30 $6,002,376,477 C - PROPERTY CLAIMED AS EXEMPT NO 0 D - CREDITORS HOLDING SECURED CLAIMS YES 2 $79,537,542 E - CREDITORS HOLDING UNSECURED YES 2 $0 PRIORITY CLAIMS F - CREDITORS HOLDING UNSECURED NON- YES 356 $5,366,962,476 PRIORITY CLAIMS G - EXECUTORY CONTRACTS AND UNEXPIRED YES 2 LEASES H - CODEBTORS YES 1 I - CURRENT INCOME OF INDIVIDUAL NO 0 N/A DEBTOR(S) J - CURRENT EXPENDITURES OF INDIVIDUAL NO 0 N/A DEBTOR(S) Total number of sheets of all Schedules 393 Total Assets > $6,002,376,477 $5,446,500,018 Total Liabilities > UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT Southern District of New York Refco Capital Markets, LTD Case Number: 05-60018 GENERAL NOTES PERTAINING TO SCHEDULES AND STATEMENTS FOR ALL DEBTORS On October 17, 2005 (the “Petition Date”), Refco Inc.