Ancestors of Rob Hall

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ancestors of Rob Hall Ancestors of Rob Hall Generation No. 1 1. Rob Hall, born in McCready Memorial Hospital, Crisfield, Somerset Co., MD; son of 2. Bryan Jennings Hall, Jr. and 3. Margaret Johnson . Generation No. 2 2. Bryan Jennings Hall, Jr., born 26 May 1920 in Somerset Co., MD; died 10 Apr 1992 in Snow Hill, Worcester Co., MD. He was the son of 4. Bryan Jennings Hall, Sr. and 5. Reba Lee Sterling . He married 3. Margaret Lorraine Johnson 18 Mar 1950 in Crisfield, Somerset Co., MD. 3. Margaret Johnson, born in Somerset Co., MD; daughter of 6. Charles William 'Charlie' Johnson and 7. Virginia May 'Virgie' Bonneville . Generation No. 3 4. Bryan Jennings Hall, Sr., born 21 Jul 1896 in Somerset Co, MD; died 12 Apr 1979 in McCready Memorial Hospital, Crisfield, Somerset Co, MD. He was the son of 8. Robert Thomas 'Bobby' Hall and 9. Nora Zinnie 'Zenora' Briddell . He married 5. Reba Lee Sterling 10 Nov 1917 in Somerset Co, MD. 5. Reba Lee Sterling, born 31 Jan 1893 in Crisfield, Somerset Co., MD; died 11 Sep 1968 in McCready Memorial Hospital, Crisfield, Somerset Co., MD. She was the daughter of 10. Robert Hance Sterling and 11. Effie L. Wilson . 6. Charles William 'Charlie' Johnson, born 08 Dec 1885 in Somerset Co, MD; died 20 Mar 1957 in McCready Memorial Hospital, Crisfield, Somerset Co, MD. He was the son of 12. John Sorin? Johnson and 13. Rose Anna Dixon . He married 7. Virginia May 'Virgie' Bonneville Nov 1929 in Somerset Co, MD. 7. Virginia May 'Virgie' Bonneville, born 30 Mar 1900 in Somerset Co., MD; died 07 Mar 1985 in Peninsula General Hospital, Salisbury, Wicomico Co, MD. She was the daughter of 14. William Henry Edgar 'Will' Bonneville and 15. Drucilla Hester 'Dru' Webster . Generation No. 4 8. Robert Thomas 'Bobby' Hall, born 03 Aug 1873 in Somerset Co., MD; died 13 Jan 1959 in Marumsco, Somerset Co., MD. He was the son of 16. Robert Lambden? Hall and 17. Phebe Elizabeth Lambden . He married 9. Nora Zinnie 'Zenora' Briddell 17 Dec 1893 in Rehobeth Baptist Church, Somerset Co., MD. 9. Nora Zinnie 'Zenora' Briddell, born 20 Apr 1877 in Marion area, Somerset Co., MD; died 07 Feb 1964 in Home of Robert Oliver Hall, Somerset Co., MD. She was the daughter of 18. Oliver Robert Briddell and 19. Elizabeth A. 'Lizzie' Howard . 10. Robert Hance Sterling, born 1856 in Crisfield, Somerset Co., MD; died 1934 in Crisfield, Somerset Co., MD. He was the son of 20. William H. 'Clodpole' Sterling and 21. Susannah Sterling . He married 11. Effie L. Wilson 18 Oct 1885 in Crisfield, Somerset Co., MD. 11. Effie L. Wilson, born 07 Oct 1866 in Somerset Co., MD; died 02 Sep 1917 in Somerset Co., MD. She was the daughter of 22. George R. Wilson and 23. Sarah Elizabeth Somers . 12. John Sorin? Johnson, born 22 Jun 1848 in Somerset Co., MD; died 26 Jul 1920 in Somerset Co., MD. He was the son of 24. Charles N. Johnson and 25. Mariah S. Moore . He married 13. Rose Anna Dixon 03 Mar 1875 in Somerset Co., MD. 13. Rose Anna Dixon, born 30 Apr 1855 in Somerset Co., MD; died 11 Apr 1931 in Crisfield, MD. She was the daughter of 26. William Piper? Dixon and 27. Mary A. Shockley . 1 © CRVH September 2008 Ancestors of Rob Hall 14. William Henry Edgar 'Will' Bonneville, born 14 Jun 1863 in Somerset Co., MD; died 1922 in Somerset Co., MD. He was the son of 28. Henry David 'Dave' Bonnewell and 29. Hester Anne Adams . He married 15. Drucilla Hester 'Dru' Webster 08 Sep 1888 in Antioch M. E. Church parsonage, Princess Anne, Somerset Co., MD. 15. Drucilla Hester 'Dru' Webster, born Nov 1865; died 14 Jan 1946 in Marion, Somerset Co, MD. She was the daughter of 30. Major Jackson Webster and 31. Mary J. Wallace . Generation No. 5 16. Robert Lambden? Hall, born 28 Jun 1842 in Somerset Co., MD; died 09 Jan 1912 in Somerset Co., Md. He was the son of 32. Edward L. Hall and 33. Elizabeth Mary R. Gibbons . He married 17. Phebe Elizabeth Lambden 30 Oct 1866 in Somerset Co., MD. 17. Phebe Elizabeth Lambden, born 1847 in Worcester Co., MD; died 10 Mar 1923 in Marion, Somerset Co., MD. She was the daughter of 34. Robert Lambden II and 35. Phoebe Gald Hastings . 18. Oliver Robert Briddell, born 07 Nov 1849 in MD; died 31 Oct 1923 in Oriole, Somerset Co., MD. He was the son of 36. Joshua Jenkins Briddell, Sr. and 37. Barsheba 'Unknown' . He married 19. Elizabeth A. 'Lizzie' Howard 14 Mar 1876 in Somerset Co., MD. 19. Elizabeth A. 'Lizzie' Howard, born 16 Nov 1851 in Somerset Co., MD; died 11 Apr 1912 in Marion, Somerset Co., MD. She was the daughter of 38. William Howard and 39. Mary Ann 'Marianne' Holland . 20. William H. 'Clodpole' Sterling, born 24 Dec 1822 in Somerset Co., MD; died 15 Jul 1892 in Crisfield, Somerset Co, MD. He was the son of 40. Isaac 'Crow' Sterling I and 41. Hester 'Hetty' Ward . He married 21. Susannah Sterling in Somerset Co., MD. 21. Susannah Sterling, born 30 Jan 1823 in Annemessex, Somerset Co., MD; died 1906 in Somerset Co, MD. She was the daughter of 42. Aaron 'Crow' Sterling and 43. Susannah 'Twister' Moore . 22. George R. Wilson, born Bet. 1839 - 1843 in Somerset Co., MD; died in Somerset Co., MD. He was the son of 44. Jesse Wilson and 45. Charlotte 'Lottie' Riggin . He married 23. Sarah Elizabeth Somers 27 Oct 1863 in Somerset Co., MD. 23. Sarah Elizabeth Somers, born Abt. 1846 in Somerset Co., MD; died Bet. 1873 - 1878 in Somerset Co., MD. She was the daughter of 46. Benjamin Somers and 47. Sarah 'Sally' Miles . 24. Charles N. Johnson, born 02 Jul 1811; died 06 Aug 1864 in Somerset Co., MD. He was possibly the son of 48. Elijah Johnson . He married 25. Mariah S. Moore 18 Nov 1835 in Somerset Co, MD. 25. Mariah S. Moore, born 10 Oct 1812 in Somerset Co., MD; died 22 Dec 1855 in Somerset Co., MD. She was the daughter of 50. William White Moore and 51. Sarah 'Sally' Cottingham . 26. William Piper? Dixon, born 1816 in Somerset Co., MD; died 1888 in Somerset Co., MD. He was the son of 52. William Dixon and 53. Leah Dykes . He married 27. Mary A. Shockley 25 Jan 1847 in Worcester Co., MD. 27. Mary A. Shockley, born 1822; died 1890 in Somerset Co., MD. 28. Henry David 'Dave' Bonnewell, born 1829 in Somerset Co., MD; died Bet. 1875 - 1876 in Somerset Co., MD. He was the son of 56. Thomas Bonnewell and 57. Rose Anna 'Nancy' Tull . He married 29. Hester Anne Adams 1850 in Somerset Co., MD. 29. Hester Anne Adams, born Bet. 1832 - 1833 in Somerset Co., MD; died Abt. 1885 in Somerset Co., MD. She was the daughter of 58. Thomas Purnell Adams and 59. Anne 'Annie' Cottingham . 2 © CRVH September 2008 Ancestors of Rob Hall 30. Major Jackson Webster, born Jul 1825. He was the son of 60. Major Webster and 61. Elizabeth Harrington . He married 31. Mary J. Wallace Abt. 19 Nov 1851 in Somerset Co., MD. 31. Mary J. Wallace, born Aug 1833. She was the daughter of 62. William Wallace and 63. Nelly 'Ellen' Laird . Generation No. 6 32. Edward L. Hall, born Abt. 1779 in Somerset Co., MD; died 1842 in Somerset Co., MD. He was the son of 64. Thomas Hall, Sr. and 65. Betsey Tull . He married 33. Elizabeth Mary R. Gibbons 21 Feb 1827 in Somerset Co, MD. 33. Elizabeth Mary R. Gibbons, born 25 Mar 1809; died 1842 in Somerset Co, MD. She was the daughter of 66. Isaac Gibbons and 67. Hetty Smith . 34. Robert Lambden II, born 1795 in Delaware; died Bef. Nov 1852 in Worcester Co., MD. He was the son of 68. Robert Lambden I and 69. Lavinia C. James . He married 35. Phoebe Gald Hastings 18 Nov 1838 in Sussex Co., DE. 35. Phoebe Gald Hastings, born 30 Oct 1814 in Laurel, Sussex Co., DE; died Abt. 1890 in Somerset Co., MD. She was the daughter of 70. Leonard Hastings and 71. Mary Hearn . 36. Joshua Jenkins Briddell, Sr., born Abt. 1798; died Bet. 1850 - 1860 in Somerset Co., MD. He was the son of 72. David Briddell, Sr. and 73. Sarah Holloway . He married 37. Barsheba 'Unknown' . 37. Barsheba 'Unknown', born Bet. 1805 - 1810; died Bef. 1870. 38. William Howard, born in Somerset Co., MD; died Bef. 1870. He married 39. Mary Ann 'Marianne' Holland 20 Nov 1850 in Somerset Co., MD. 39. Mary Ann 'Marianne' Holland, born Nov 1829 in Somerset Co., MD; died 01 Sep 1901. She was the daughter of 78. George L. Holland and 79. Mary Ann Lankford . 40. Isaac 'Crow' Sterling I, born 17 Apr 1793; died 30 May 1870 in Somerset Co, MD. He was the son of 80. Henry Sterling II and 81. Sally 'Unknown' . He married 41. Hester 'Hetty' Ward 29 Aug 1815 in Somerset Co., MD. 41. Hester 'Hetty' Ward, born Bet. 1795 - 1796; died 04 Nov 1880 in Somerset Co, MD. She was the daughter of 82. James Ward . 42. Aaron 'Crow' Sterling, born 09 Apr 1792 in Annemessex, Somerset Co., MD; died 30 Aug 1871 in Annemessex, Somerset Co., MD. He was the son of 84. Travers Sterling and 85. Grace Sterling . He married 43. Susannah 'Twister' Moore . 43. Susannah 'Twister' Moore, born 09 Nov 1793 in Somerset Co., MD; died 11 Jan 1866 in Annemessex, Somerset Co., MD.
Recommended publications
  • Law and the Structure of Power in Colonial Virginia
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Valparaiso University Valparaiso University Law Review Volume 48 Number 3 Spring 2014 pp.757-883 Spring 2014 Law and the Structure of Power in Colonial Virginia William E. Nelson Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/vulr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation William E. Nelson, Law and the Structure of Power in Colonial Virginia, 48 Val. U. L. Rev. 757 (2015). Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/vulr/vol48/iss3/9 This Lecture is brought to you for free and open access by the Valparaiso University Law School at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Valparaiso University Law Review by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Nelson: Law and the Structure of Power in Colonial Virginia Lectures LAW AND THE STRUCTURE OF POWER IN COLONIAL VIRGINIA William E. Nelson* I. INTRODUCTION For most of England’s North American empire, the restoration of Charles II to the nation’s throne in 1660 quickly led to a sharp break in the continuity of the legal system. In New England, the crown began to interfere with local legal ordering in ways unprecedented since Plymouth had been founded in 1620. In the Middle Atlantic, the Restoration led to a new imperialism that replaced Dutch rule and Dutch law with English rule and English common law. In the Carolinas, Charles II’s new policies led to the founding of two new colonies.
    [Show full text]
  • Obedience Robins of Accomack: 17Th-Century
    OBEDIENCE ROBINS OF ACCOMACK: 17TH-CENTURY STRATEGIES FOR SUCCESS A Thesis MARY CA~ WILHEIT Submitted to the Once of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS December 1997 Major Subject: History OBEDIENCE ROBINS OF ACCOMACK: 17TH-CENTURY STRATEGIES FOR SUCCESS A Thesis MARY CA~ WILHEIT Submitted to Texas AyrM University in partial tulfillment of thc requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Approved as to style and content by. John L. Canup Walter L. Buenger ( hair of Committee) (Member) Dennis A. Berthold Julia Kirk ckvvelder (Member) (Head ol Dcpa nt) December 1997 Major Subject: History ABSTRACT Obedience Robins of Accomack: 17th-Century Strategies for Success. (December 1997) Mary Catherine Wilheit, A. B., Wilson College Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. John L. Canup Obedience Robins emigrated to Virginia in the 1620s in search of the land and status his elder brother gained by inheritance. This thesis establishes motivations for immigration and methods by which one English emigr6 achieved success in Virginia. The 1582 will of Richard Robins established a pattern of primogeniture for successive generations of his Northamptonshire family. Muster lists, wills, parish registers and a 1591 manor survey record increasing prosperity and associated expectations. Robinses were among those "better sorts" who paid taxes, provided armour, held local office, educated their children, and protcstcd against perceived government injustice. In Virginia. Richard Robins*s great grandson parlayed his assets into land, office and status. The extent of his education and financial resources was probably limited, but good health, timing.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MUSEUM During 1970 and 1971 Considerable Work Has Been Done on the Collections, Although Much Still Remains to Be Sorted Out
    THE MUSEUM During 1970 and 1971 considerable work has been done on the collections, although much still remains to be sorted out. The work of identifying and labelling geological specimens has been completed, and the insect collections sorted, fumi- gated, labelled, put in checklist order and card indexed. The egg collection has also been re-labelled and card indexed, and some specimens added to it. In the historical field a large collection of photographic plates, mainly taken by Taunt of Oxford about 1900, has been sorted and placed in individual envelopes. Racking has been installed in part of the first floor of the stable and most of the collection of pottery sherds transferred to it, where it is easily accessible. A start has been made on the production of a card index of the folk collection and to-date some 1,500 cards have been completed. At short notice reports on archaeological sites in the Chilterns and in the River Ouse Green Belt were prepared, and at greater leisure one on the Vale of Aylesbury for the County Planning Department. This involved visiting a very large number of sites, which did however yield additional information about some. A start has been made on an examination of air photographs of the county, and a number of new sites, particularly of ring ditches and medieval sites, have been found. Excavations were carried out by the museum staff on four sites referred to in The Records, three of them on behalf of the Milton Keynes Research Committee. Amongst the exhibitions was one of Museum Purchases 1960-1970, opened by Earl Howe, Chairman of the County Education Committee, which showed all the purchases made during that period.
    [Show full text]
  • Founder Burial Sites in Virginia
    Founder Burial Sites In Virginia Forward This book is presented by the Virginia Society of the Order of Founders and Patriots of America. Virginia burials of male person who resided in Virginia prior to 13 May 1657. Some individuals do not qualify as Founders under the rules of the Order of Founders and Patriots of America. We decided to include their names because they contributed to the history of the Commonwealth of Virginia before 13 May 1657. This document is a work in progress as names will be removed and added as additional references become available. Some names might not even have references but are being inserted as they are being worked on. This project started in 2007 by Mike Lyman as he discovered Founders' Burial Sites in Virginia. Most of the men identified meet the Order of The Founders and Patriots of America requirement to be considered a Founder. All were in the Colonies, specifically Virginia before May 13, 1657. Consequently, many of the references are specifically to prove the arrival or presence before May 13, 1657. This work has been edited/data entry by Past Virginia Governor Jerry Hubbard. Corrections or additions may be mailed to: Donnel J. Hubbard, 200 Elmwood Drive, Culpeper, VA 22701-4028 or emailed to [email protected]. SURNAME: Alymer GIVEN NAME: Justinian BIRTH YEAR: by 1624 BIRTH PLACE: England DEATH DATE: c1667 CEMETERY: 1st Church Kichotan CEMETERY LOCATION: LaSalle & Kenmore Street COUNTY/CITY: Hampton STONE: no SPOUSE: SPOUSE DATES: REMARKS: Reverend of First Church Elizabeth Parish of Hampton, 1644-1667 NOTES: SOURCE: Cavaliers & Pioneers, Patent Books ,No.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter Smith, 'Lady Oxford's Alterations at Welbeck Abbey 1741–55', the Georgian Group Journal, Vol. Xi, 2001, Pp
    Peter Smith, ‘Lady Oxford’s alterations at Welbeck Abbey 1741–55’, The Georgian Group Journal, Vol. XI, 2001, pp. 133–168 TEXT © THE AUTHORS 2001 LADY OXFORD’S ALTERATIONS AT WELBECK ABBEY, – PETER SMITH idowhood could be a rare time of indepen - On July the Duke died unexpectedly, after Wdence for a woman in the eighteenth century, a riding accident at Welbeck, precipitating a and especially for one like the dowager Countess of mammoth legal battle over the Cavendish estates. By Oxford and Mortimer (Fig. ), who had complete his will all his estates in Yorkshire, Staffordshire and control of her own money and estates. Born Lady Northumberland were bequeathed to his year-old Henrietta Cavendish-Holles in , the only daughter Henrietta, while an estate at Orton in daughter of John Holles, st Duke of Newcastle, and Huntingdonshire passed to his wife and the remainder his wife, formerly Lady Margaret Cavendish, she of his considerable property passed to his nephew chose to spend her widowhood building, like her Thomas Pelham. This would have meant that the great-great-great-grandmother, Bess of Hardwick, former Cavendish estates in Nottinghamshire and before her. Derbyshire would have gone to Thomas Pelham, not Lady Oxford had fought hard, and paid a high Henrietta. When the widowed Duchess discovered price, to retain her mother’s Cavendish family estates, the terms of her husband’s will she ‘was indignant and she obviously felt a particularly strong beyond measure’ and ‘immediately resolved to attachment to them. These estates were centred dispute its validity’. The legal battle which ensued around the former Premonstratensian abbey at was bitter and complex, and it was only finally settled Welbeck, in Nottinghamshire, but also included the after the death of the Duchess by a private Act of Bolsover Castle estate in Derbyshire and the Ogle Parliament in .
    [Show full text]
  • The Gothick COMMONWEALTH of AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969
    702132/702835 European Architecture B the Gothick COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 Warning This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of the University of Melbourne pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (the Act). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further copying or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. do not remove this notice the Gothick a national style a style with genuine associational values a style for which there was local archaeological evidence a style with links to real architecture THETHE EARLYEARLY GOTHICKGOTHICK Woodstock Manor, Oxfordshire, illustrated in 1714 J D Hunt & Peter Willis [eds], The Genius of the Place (London 1975), p 119 The Belvedere, Claremont, Esher, Surrey, by Vanbrugh, c 1715-16; Vanbrugh Castle, Greenwich, by Vanbrugh, 1717 George Mott & S S Aall, Follies and Pleasure Pavilions (London 1989), p 46; Miles Lewis King Alfred's Hall, Cirencester Park, begun 1721, contemporary & modern views Christopher Hussey, English Gardens and Landscapes (London 1967), pl 93 mock Fort at Wentworth Castle, begun 1728 Vilet's engraving of 1771 & modern photo of the remains Country Life, 14 February 1974, p 309 the 'Temple' at Aske, Yorkshire, apparently by William Kent, built by William Halfpenny between 1727 and 1758: view & ceiling of the principal room in the Octagon Tower Mott & Aall, Follies and Pleasure Pavilions, p 29; Country Life, 26 September 1974,
    [Show full text]
  • Worcester Statement of Significance
    WORCESTER STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE January 2019 ST MARTIN IN THE CORNMARKET WORCESTER (formerly known as Old St Martin’s) STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE 1.0 Areas of significance There are four important areas of significance to which we need to draw attention within the history and site of St. Martin in the Cornmarket. 1.1 The Churchyard Garden 1.2 North Side Entrance 1.3 West End Under-Gallery and the Tower 1.4 The Parish Room 2.0 Table of Basic Facts 2.1 Parish : The Benefice of Worcester, St Martin in the Cornmarket with St. Swithun and St. Paul 2.2 Dedication : St. Martin of Tours 2.3 Address : Parish Office, St. Swithun’s Institute, The Trinity, Worcester WR1 2PN 2.4 Diocese : Worcester (Church of England) 2.5 Planning Authority : City of Worcester 2.6 County : Worcestershire 2.7 Statutory Listing : Grade II* 2.8 Statutory designation of structures and objects within churchyard : None 2.9 Conservation Area : Historic City Conservation Area 2.10 Tree Preservations : None 2.11 Protected species : None Document Contents 3.0 Introduction and Background 4.0 The Church in its urban setting and environment 5.0 The Church and its Garden 6.0 The Space below the West End Gallery and the Tower 7.0 The Mission Room and Parish Hall 8.0 North Side Entrance 9.0 Conclusion At the end of this document will be found a list of photographs and maps relevant to the text, which can be viewed on request. 3.0 Introduction and Background: The Church’s Dedication, Architecture and Interior 3.1 Tradition has it that there has been a church on this site since before Norman times.
    [Show full text]
  • University Microfilms 300 North Zaeb Road Ann Arbor
    INFORMATION TO USERS This dissertation was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Kith and Kin
    SOUTHERN KITH AND KIN Dear Scarborough researches: First I wanted to just tell you ahead of time, it did take me quite awhile to put this together. I typed word for word what is "Southern kith and kin". I hope that you enjoy it and find what you are looking for. More than likely if you're family names are in this book we're related. The index will be off slightly since the font originally used doesn't exit any more so please be patient with that. Also, I've changed this document into an Adobe Acrobat file for one main reason, and that is because not everyone has Microsoft word and Adobe Acrobat reader is free online. I've also added a link to my personal rendering of the Scarborough coat of arms. I hope that you enjoy this book as much as I did. Sincerely, Stephen T. Stephan Grandson of Mildred Christine Scarboro(ugh). 2 SOUTHERN KITH AND KIN Southern Kith and Kin By Jewell Davis Scarborough Copyright ©1957 3 SOUTHERN KITH AND KIN http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adjuvantedeo/images/Scarborough.jpg THE SCARBOROUGH COAT OF ARMS AND CREST Artwork Courtesy of Stephen Thomas Stephan/transcriber 4 SOUTHERN KITH AND KIN EDMUND SCARBOROUGH, of North Walsham, County Norfolk, England, born circa 1584; of Accomac, Virginia; died circa 1634 ARMS: Or, a chevron between three towers gules. CREST: From a Mural Crown gules a demi-lion or supporting a spear erect, on the point a Saracen's head, all proper, the head wreathed silver and azure. Description of Armorial terms: Or means gold; gules, red, all proper means in natural colors.
    [Show full text]
  • Jericho Conservation Area Designation Study
    Jericho Conservation Area Designation Study Oxford City Council – City Development October 2010 Contents Reason for the Study........................................................................................3 Study Area........................................................................................................4 Summary of Significance..................................................................................5 Vulnerability......................................................................................................7 Opportunity for Enhancement ..........................................................................9 Archaeological Interest...................................................................................10 Designated Heritage Assets and Buildings of Local Architectural and Historic Interest............................................................................................................12 Designated Heritage Assets in the surrounding area that influence the character of the study area:............................................................................12 Historic Development .....................................................................................14 Medieval 1086 – 1453 ................................................................................14 Early Modern 1453-1789 ............................................................................16 1790-1899...................................................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • Cavaliers and Pioneers, a Calendar of Virginia Land Grants, 1623-1800
    333.3 N894ca NUGENT v.1:4 CAVALIERS AND PIONEERS UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS . UBRARV ,LL - HIST. SURVEY Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2012 with funding from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign http://www.archive.org/details/cavalierspioneer14nuge a Vol. I. No. 4 TH'r 3JU ILLINOIS UNlVtKbli Y UF # Cavaliers and Pioneers A CALENDAR OF VIRGINIA LAND GRANTS 1623 - 1800 COMPILED BY NELL M. NUGENT RICHMOND, VA. Press of The Dietz Printinc Co., Richmond, Va ' A - >- Cavaliers and Pioneers 1623 A CALENDAR OF VIRGINIA LAND GRANTS 1800 Vol. I. No. 4. PATENT BOOK 1, PART II. BY SIR JOHN HARVEY CHRISTOPHER BRANCH, 250 acs. in Thomas Powell of Howlton in the Henrico Co., March 12, 1638. Page 608. Countie of Suffolke yeoman brother and At Kingsland over against the Long lawfull heire of Capt. Nathaniell Powell feild, E. upon main river, adj. Southerly late of Virginia deceased as by the deed upon land of John Griffin, now occupied of conveyance now upon record from the by sd. Branch. 50 acs. for his personal said John Taylor more at large appear- adventure & 200 acs. for trans, of 4 eth." The other 1,250 acs. due sd. pers. (Names not given.) Barker & Associates & Co. by & for trans, at their own charges of 25 pers. HOWARD HORSEY, 1,400 acs. in Georg Gregory, Tho. Percocks, Wm. Henrico Co., Feb. 12, 1638, page 608. Radway, Isaac Radway, Wm. Straing, Adj. Christo. Branch. 1,000 acs. granted Jon. Yates, Jon. Minter, Dorothy Stand- by order of court dated June 6, 1635 & ish, Mathew Robinson, Daniell Good- 400 for trans, of 28 pers., whose names win, Jon.
    [Show full text]
  • North Oxford Victorian Suburb
    North Oxford Victorian Suburb Conservation Area Appraisal North Oxford Victorian Suburb Contents Statement of Special Interest 3 1. Introduction 5 2. Context 7 3. Historical Development 8 4. Spatial Analysis 12 5. Buildings 16 6. Character Areas 23 Norham Manor 23 Park Town 26 Bardwell 29 Kingston Road 33 St Margaret's 36 Banbury Road 39 North Parade 42 Lathbury and Staverton Roads 45 7. Vulnerabilities, Negative Features and Opportunities for Enhancement 47 8. SOURCES 51 9. APPENDICES 52 1: Listed Buildings 52 2: Positive Unlisted Buildings 58 3: Maps 59 1 1. Summary of Significance Statement of Special Interest This conservation area’s primary signifi- cance derives from its character as a distinct area, imposed in part by topography as Summary well as by land ownership from the 16th century into the 21st century. At a time Key positive features when Oxford needed to expand out of its • Diversity historic core centred around the castle, the • Village-like enclaves medieval streets and the major colleges, these two factors enabled the area to be • Quality of the buildings laid out as a planned suburb as lands asso- • Residential houses a special feature ciated with medieval manors were made • Gothic, Italianate, Arts and Crafts, Vernacular styles available. This gives the area homogeneity • Purpose-built college teaching and as a residential suburb. In the eastern and residential accommodation central parts of the area as a whole, this • Contribution of 20th and 21st centuries to the area is reinforced by the broad streets and the feeling of spaciousness created by the • Three ecclesiastical buildings generously proportioned and well-planted • 73 listed buildings and a further 21 buildings gardens.
    [Show full text]