And 5-Year-Old Dutch Children—The GECKO Drenthe Cohort
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
International Journal of Obesity (2014) 38, 569–571 & 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0307-0565/14 www.nature.com/ijo PEDIATRIC SHORT COMMUNICATION Skipping breakfast and overweight in 2- and 5-year-old Dutch children—the GECKO Drenthe cohort LK Ku¨ pers1, JJ de Pijper1, PJJ Sauer2, RP Stolk1 and E Corpeleijn1 Skipping breakfast is associated with higher BMI in children aged 5 years and older. However, not much is known about this association in younger children. In the Dutch GECKO Drenthe birth cohort we examined the association between breakfast skipping and objectively measured overweight at the age of 2 (n ¼ 1488) and 5 (n ¼ 1366) years. At 2 years, 124 (8.3%) children were overweight and 44 (3.0%) did not eat breakfast daily. At 5 years, 180 (13.2%) children were overweight and 73 (5.3%) did not eat breakfast daily. Children belonging to families of non-Dutch origin, those with lower educated parents and those with single parents skipped breakfast more often. Breakfast skipping in 2- and 5-year-olds is rare in the Netherlands. We found no association between skipping breakfast and overweight, neither at age 2 (odds ratio (OR): 1.85 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.61–5.64)) nor at age 5 (OR: 0.46 (95% CI: 0.19–1.11)). Also the type of breakfast was not related to overweight at 5 years. An explanation for this finding might be that skipping breakfast is not (yet) an issue in these children. International Journal of Obesity (2014) 38, 569–571; doi:10.1038/ijo.2013.194 Keywords: eating habits; nutrition; infant; adiposity; BMI INTRODUCTION were interpolated, resulting in 1.370 for girls and 1.430 for boys. At 5 years Children who eat breakfast generally have a healthier lifestyle of age the children were on average 5.7 years (4.3 to 6.5 years). Therefore, 1,2 BMI z-score cut-offs of 1.036 for girls and 1.206 for boys were used. compared with those who skip breakfast. Eating breakfast is In the parent-reported questionnaire at 2 and 5 years the question associated with a higher intake of micronutrients and an improved 2,3 regarding breakfast frequency was: ‘How often does your child eat quality of diet. Previous studies showed that older children, girls, breakfast weekly?’ with answer categories ranging from 1 to 7 days per immigrants and children of parents with a lower socioeconomic week. The answer categories were combined as either ‘eating breakfast 1,2,4,5 status skip breakfast more often. Skipping breakfast in daily’ (7 times per week) or ‘not eating breakfast daily’ (o7 times per week) children is associated with higher childhood BMI.1,2,6,7 In 2009 in to increase numbers in the categories. the Netherlands, approximately 5% of 10–11-year-old children For longitudinal analysis, the scores for skipping breakfast at 2 and 5 skipped breakfast, which increased to 33% in 16–19-year-olds.5 years were combined. The categories for this analysis were (1) not skipping Since not much is known about breakfast skipping or its breakfast at 2 and 5 years, (2) not skipping breakfast at 2 but skipping breakfast at 5 years, (3) skipping breakfast at 2 but not at 5 years and (4) association with overweight in very young children (2–5-year-olds), continued skipping breakfast at 2 and 5 years. we studied these factors in this very young group. Type of breakfast was defined as (1) bread, (2) cereals or porridge, (3) others or (4) a combination of these for the cross-sectional association between type of breakfast and overweight at 5 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS On the basis of the literature and the information available in our data Data were derived from the GECKO Drenthe cohort:8 a population-based set, all analyses were adjusted for gender, exact age at 2 and 5 years, birth birth cohort that studies risk factors for overweight from childhood until weight, origin (Dutch or non-Dutch), maternal educational level (low/ adulthood. In this cohort anthropometric measurements are recorded by average or high), maternal and paternal BMI at 2 or 5 years and family type trained nurses at municipal health services at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, 11, 14, 18, 24, (single-parent family or not). Missing values on covariates (max.9.8% 36, 45 and 60 months after birth. Parents answer a questionnaire about missing at 2 years and 17.1% at 5 years) were imputed using multiple lifestyle and environment at every visit. Details about this cohort have imputation. All associations were analysed using multivariate logistic been presented elsewhere.8 regression at 2 and 5 years. From 2006 onwards, 2874 parent–child pairs have ever actively participated in the cohort; all mothers signed an informed consent form. In these analyses, exclusion was based on withdrawal of informed consent (n ¼ 2) and missing measurements and/or questionnaires (n ¼ 1384 / RESULTS n ¼ 1506 at 2 or 5 years of age, respectively). A subgroup of 1488 children At the age of 2, only 3.0% of the children did not eat breakfast remained at 2 years and 1366 at 5 years. Body mass index (BMI) z-scores were based on age- and gender-specific daily, which increased to 5.3% at 5 years (Table 1). The prevalence Dutch reference growth charts of 1997 using Growth Analyser.9 of overweight at 2 years of age was 8.3%, which increased to Overweight was dichotomised on the basis of the z-scores of the cut- 13.2% at 5 years. offs given by Cole et al.10 At 2 years of age the children were on average Skipping breakfast was not associated with overweight at either 2.1 years (1.8 to 2.7 years). Thus, the BMI z-score cut-offs for 2 and 2.5 years age, after adjustment for all confounders (Table 2). Unadjusted 1Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands and 2Department of Pediatrics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. Correspondence: LK Ku¨pers, Department of Epidemiology (FA40), University Medical Center, University of Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RG Groningen, The Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected] Received 27 June 2013; revised 1 October 2013; accepted 15 October 2013; accepted article preview online 25 October 2013; advance online publication, 26 November 2013 Breakfast and overweight in 2- and 5-year-olds LK Ku¨pers et al 570 results were essentially similar (data not shown). The most 2 to 5 years. However, rather than breakfast skipping, other factors important factors for skipping breakfast were non-Dutch origin, may be responsible for the development of overweight at this single parenting and low/average maternal educational level. Also young age—for example, parental overweight and birth weight.16 in the longitudinal approach, no association was found between Older children could be more in charge of their own decisions continuation of skipping breakfast (at 2 and 5 years of age) and regarding meal habits.14 Older age could also be related to fewer overweight at 5 years of age (odds ratio (OR): 0.72 (95% family meal times.14 In addition, older children (especially girls) are confidence interval (CI): 0.15–3.49)) when compared with not shown to be more conscious about their weight; therefore, they skipping breakfast at 2 and 5 years. The different types of might skip breakfast to lose weight.14,17,18 As we did not find breakfast (bread, cereals/porridge, other or a combination of differences between boys and girls for breakfast skipping and these) were also not associated with the risk of overweight (data overweight we did not stratify for gender. not shown). Second, the different studies used varying definitions to describe breakfast frequency.2,15 In a group of Greek adolescents, the association with overweight differed with DISCUSSION varying definitions of skipping breakfast.19 Our definition leads Breakfast skipping is rare in 2- and 5-year-old children in the to an estimated prevalence of 3–5% for breakfast skipping, which Netherlands. Contradictory to our hypothesis, breakfast skipping is in line with the previously reported prevalence of 4% in 4–6- was not associated with overweight, neither in 2- nor in 5-year- year-old Dutch children in 1998.20 We propose to define having olds. As expected, the risk of skipping breakfast was increased in breakfast as per the definition given by Giovannini et al. as: ‘The children of non-Dutch origin, in those with mothers with low/ first meal of the day, eaten before or at the start of daily activities, middle education and in children belonging to single-parent within 2 h of awaking, typically no later than 1000 and of a calorie families. level between 20 and 30% of total daily energy needs’.21 Comparable to our study, Lioret et al. also did not find an A third explanation could be the use of different cut-off points association between skipping breakfast and overweight in 3–11- to define overweight. Nevertheless, Dubois et al. found an year-old children.4 In contrast, most other studies in 4–12-year- association between breakfast skipping and overweight,12 both olds did find an association between skipping breakfast and with overweight based on the definition of Cole et al. (14.3%) as overweight.11–13 Several explanations are possible for this well as based on the ‘US Centres for Disease Control and inconsistency. Prevention’ (8.8%). At present, the discussion on the validity of BMI First, age plays a role.