DOCSLIB.ORG

C R ~ the Community, the Primacy of Scripture and the Deepen It

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
C R ~ the Community, the Primacy of Scripture and the Deepen It ..•.... ,~. ,. -.,.~, -r-. Twenty Years of Music in Catholic Worship: The Changes that Didn't Change hen the BCl announced in 1981 that Music in vision that has produced an understanding of the Church's Catholic Worship (MCW) was to be revised, many rites in which music is integral and no longer the "ancilla" of W of us fell into profound depression only after we the Motu Proprio. Music was still to be ancillary to the rite, landed from circling the walls. For almost ten years, but it was not just a "beautiful package wrapped up with a workshops, lectures, classes and pastor-musician gold ribbon" as an offering to God similar to the juggler's gift encounters had drawn enormous amrnunitien from the in front of the Madonna. Music was to be expressive of the document which validated pastoral music with the three community, relevant to the community, unifying the judgments in the selection of music-liturgical, musical and community and moving the community into the presence of pastoral. We could envision our lectures and demonstrations the Holy One. Music was to be prayer, not just being gutted and we would be left with,Ptu~ X's 'Motu ornamentation. Proprio' of 1903, hardly the best document to q~~te in the In the twenty years that have transpired since its advocacy of guitars and folk music. Our--fe~rsWere allayed , appearance, some discernible characteristics or conventions when the revision, Liturgical Music Today,(L:MT), appeared in are present in the church that were not there before the 1982. The new document was more of an amplification than Second Vatican Council. The obvious changes in the a revision. The language lost its poetic tone, but we public celebration of the Church's liturgy were the could still safely say "People in love make signs of /--", establishment of the vernacular, the altar facing love, not only to express their love but ~Iso to -c r ~ the community, the primacy of Scripture and the deepen it. love never expressed dies"' '," /.~~Iii.-:J active participation of the community. Therein ~Paragraph4 MC~.I) and "F~ith grows w~henit / ("1: f~~ /--;:'-:, lies the most earth-moving characteristi-the is well expressed In celebration. Good' 1'\"'1 ~j,g (J"~ .,~,.~. community, or in today's terminology, "the celebrations foster and nourish faith. Poor • \..:~:::.L~\.~ ~" assembly" and the power of the assembly. celebrations may weaken and destroy it.~, , '- \" '".-'- The assembly quickly emerges as the (Paragraph 6 MCW) And of course the 1 ~. .....~__ primary symbol of the liturgy that the CSl bombshell of the pastoral-musical-liturqical. ~ '.., envisioned. From the ministry of the judgment was still intact and continues to :be a ~/'~'" assembly come the other visible ones of valuable tool for negotiations with recalcitrant ; lector, cantor, presider, eucharistic minister. To clergy and unbudging musicians.' . express their roles and the common role of the The appearance of MCW in 1982 came at an assembly as celebrator, music is called upon to form important time in the development of the post-Conciliar a language that is to flesh out the rites. That language was liturgy. The constitution on the Sacred Liturgy (CSl) was to be shaped by that three part judgment cited above. No nine years old and the experimentation with the expression longer was it a solely aesthetic judgment. It was not enough of the ever changing forms of the liturgyw~s polarizing that the music piece be beautiful, but it was to function parishes and communities everywhere.TJ;le traditional appropriately at the liturgical moment and fall within the musician was threatened and felt under $,iege. The emerging pastoral requirements of that assembly. It is this last pastoral musician was faced with a small repertory and had judgment that is both the strength and weakness of the little or no clear direction of what to do with it other than sing document. What constitutes "pastoral"? it, strum it, and bear the derision of church gores who blamed Examples are better than definitions. 1. A bride requests the musician for everything they couldn't .stand about the Mendelssohn's wedding march as a recessional. The "New church." MCW gave us vocabularyorqanization and organist nearly hemorrhages at the thought and digs his or Of course, there are the important answers to the questions posed in the first days of the Council's reforms. 'What do we sing?" Acclamations, processional songs, responsorial psalms, everything else. There you have it. All lined up in preference. 'Who does the singing?" The assembly, the choirs, the presiders, the cantors, the psalm leaders. Those designations are based on the liturgical scheme which determines the function of the item. The clarity was a beacon in the dark storm of post-conciliar morass. The document enjoys good health today. That doesn't mean that it her feet in. No way! It violates Paragraph 55 states, "Liturgical music doesn't go in for a check up now and everything that the organist has held as today must be as diverse and multi- then. A major reflection and dialogue sacred. The bride falls into irrational cultural as the members of these on MCW oy The Milwaukee Symposia behavior (screaming) and promises she assembly ... Likewise the great musical for Church Composers has been will never ever come to church again. gifts of the Hispanic, Black and other prepared for study and evaluation. It is She has dreamed for years that this ethnic communities in the Church an example of how the document still is piece would make up her wedding. The should enrich the whole Church in the an active force in how we understand organist relents and plays the piece. United States in a dialogue of cultures." music in the celebration of the liturgy. The bride joins the choir after her The wisdom of this language is that it With this next wave of refinement we honeymoon and is elected president of admits inclusivity, but doesn't give come closer to understanding what the the parish council. That's sound guidelines or rules on how to do it. original opening statements pastoral judgment! Nothing could have been worse than to proclaimed, ·We are Christians have had the BCl mandating a national 2. The eighth grade plans their because through the Christian hymnal which would be the official graduation and would like to sing "On community, we have met Jesus Christ, . compendium of Anglo and non-Anglo Eagles Wings· for the three-hundredth heard his word in invitation, and repertory. Today, that hymnal would time. The music minister has a cow. responded to him in faith. We gather at have to be the size of the New York, He or she can't bear to schedule it one Mass (liturgy) that we may hear and Chicago, and Los Angeles phone books more time. The PTA asks why not? express our faith again in this assembly combined. With the concern of the The music minister senses the and by expressing it, renew and 1992 church for cultural diversity, the deepen it.-:- appropriateness for this group at this avenue is still open for further time. They sing "On Eagles Wings" as expansions of musical expressions and Fred Mo/eck the responsorial psalm. That's sound broad enough for cultural adaptation. Associate Professor of Fine Arts pastoral judgment Music Director, Campus Ministry -Seton Hill The role of the musician has gained 3. The director of religious studies College, Greensburg, PA new prestige with the document's thought it would be a good choice to Editor, GIA Quarterly, GIA Publications, lnc., important statements on music sing "Happy Days are Here Again" as Chicago,IL personnel and their training. Paragraph the recessional for Mass at the end of 77 in MCW champions the rights of the summer school. The contemporary Editor's Note: musicians as earners of just wages. ensemble works out a rag-time rendition The text of The Milwaukee Symposia lMT further expands that paragraph in of it. The pastor collapses at his chair for Church Composers: A Ten Year paragraphs 64, 65, and 66 which and so do the better-trained catechists. Report is copyrighted © 1992, includes the necessity of skill building That's bad pastoral judgment. Archdiocese of Milwaukee. and training. Within that context and The judgment is qualified by enjoying the thrust of those documents, The publication of the text is extenuating 'circumstances and the National Association of Pastoral copyrighted and co-published by: circumstances are always under Musicians (NPM) has certainly been a The National Association of Pastoral observation. MCW admits this variable. crucial factor in elevating the status of Musicians For the first time in nearly one thousand the Roman Catholic musician. These 225 Sheridan Street NW years, the understanding of the function two documents could very easily be the Washington DC 20011-1492 of a piece of music is given a breadth constitution of the NPM. 1-202-723-5800 that takes into account sociological and Liturgy Training Publications These areas of pastoral concern are cultural factors. Such an understanding 1800 North Hermitage Avenue sometimes missed when the document is reinforced by paragraphs 54 and 55 Chicago Il 60622-1101 is studied but they do provide an in Liturgical Music Today. These two 1-800-933-1800 important change of direction in the paragraphs echo the valuing of native understanding of the church's music. Copies of this document are available culture in chapter six of the CSL. from the Worship Office. - 2------------------------------------------------------------ -, . ~ As part of the preparations for the publication of a new edition of the lectionary, the American Bishops requested permission of the Vatican to amend the acclamations at the conclusion of the scripture readings: "This is the Word of the Lord;" and "This is the gospel of the Lord." On March 27, 1992, Archbishop Pilarczyk, President of the National Conference of Catholic Bishops announced that the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments had approved the slightly revised translation of "Verbum Domini" when used in the Liturgy.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • TORCHBEARER DURING HIGH MASS (MISSA CANTATA) OR SOLEMN HIGH MASS the Torchbearers (Tbs) Are Like the Honor Guard for Our Lord
    TORCHBEARER DURING HIGH MASS (MISSA CANTATA) OR SOLEMN HIGH MASS The Torchbearers (Tbs) are like the honor guard for Our Lord. During a High Mass, they take the place of the Sanctus Candle, an ancient Roman custom at Low Mass, which is lit from the Sanctus until the Ablutions. The Tbs also accompany Our Lord at the Communion Rail when Holy Communion is distributed1. During processions of the Blessed Sacrament, they accompany Him on either side of the canopy that covers Him2. It is the position of Tb, more so than of any other position, that adds solemnity to the Mass, who with his bright torch illuminates the Sanctuary and helps to surround Our Lord during the Canon, thereby highlighting and adding splendor to the most sacred part of the Mass3. General Rules • unity of action is very important and conducive in carrying out the various actions of Tbs’ office smoothly. Great care should be taken by Tbs to work as a team, and not as a group of individuals, especially in processing, genuflecting, and kneeling. • Tbs always turn inwards, that is, towards each other, when next to each other. • Tbs usually walk in their proper pairs and shoulder to shoulder [unless there is a lack of room; then they do so in single file, with the highest ranking Tb always going first] • whenever Tbs are processing, they should always be at least 4 pews away from each other [about 10 feet]; this will prevent Tbs from bunching up during processions, especially while genuflecting at the Foot of the Altar.
    [Show full text]
  • General Instruction of the Roman Missal
    GENERAL INSTRUCTION OF THE ROMAN MISSAL Concordat cum originali: + Most Rev. Gregory M. Aymond Chairman, USCCB Committee on Divine Worship after review by Rev. Richard B. Hilgartner Executive Director, USCCB Secretariat of Divine Worship The Roman Missal, Third Edition for use in the Dioceses of the United States of America was confirmed by decree of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments on March 26, 2010 (Prot. n. 1464/06/L). Proper adaptations for the United States were confirmed on July 24, 2010 (Prot. n. 577/10/L). Excerpts from the English translation of The Roman Missal © 2010 International Commission on English in the Liturgy Corporation. All rights reserved. Particular adaptations for the Dioceses of the United States of America © 2010 United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, Washington, DC. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2011, United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, Washington, DC. All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the copyright holder. TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents Foreword to this Edition Introduction Chapter I: The Importance and Dignity of the Celebration of the Eucharist Chapter II: The Structure of the Mass, Its Elements, and Its Parts Chapter III: Duties and Ministries in the Mass Chapter IV: The Different Forms of Celebrating Mass Chapter V: The Arrangement
    [Show full text]
  • General Instruction of the Roman Missal
    Copyright © 2003, United States Catholic Conference, Inc., Washington, D.C. All rights reserved. General Instruction of the Roman Missal Including Adaptations for the Dioceses of the United States of America Concordat cum originali: Msgr. James Patrick Moroney Executive Director, Secretariat for the Liturgy United States Conference of Catholic Bishops The English translation of the General Instruction of the Roman Missal (Third Typical Edition) © 2002, International Committee on English in the Liturgy, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the copyright holder. This text is confirmed for use in the Dioceses of the United States of America. Persons from other nations should consult the local Episcopal Conference regarding the appropriate text for their nation. 1 CONTENTS FOREWORD TO THIS EDITION DECREE OF CONFIRMATION DECREE OF PUBLICATION THE GENERAL INSTRUCTION OF THE ROMAN MISSAL PREAMBLE A Witness to Unchanged Faith A Witness to Unbroken Tradition Accommodation to New Conditions CHAPTER I THE IMPORTANCE AND DIGNITY OF THE EUCHARISTIC CELEBRATION CHAPTER II THE STRUCTURE OF THE MASS, ITS ELEMENTS AND ITS PARTS I. THE GENERAL STRUCTURE OF THE MASS II. THE DIFFERENT ELEMENTS OF THE MASS Reading and Explaining the Word of God The Prayers and Other Parts Pertaining to the Priest The Other Formulas in the Celebration The Vocal Expression of the Different Texts The Importance of Singing Movements and Posture Silence III. THE INDIVIDUAL PARTS OF THE MASS A.
    [Show full text]
  • Elegant Report
    ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON-HOUSTON OFFICE OF WORSHIP The Year of Grace – 2019 LITURGICAL CALENDAR NOTES FOR THE ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON-HOUSTON Liturgical Calendar Notes .....................................................................................................................................2 Purpose of this Document ....................................................................................................................... 2 The Roman Missal, Third Edition .......................................................................................................... 2 For the Conferral of Baptism ..................................................................................................... 2 For the Conferral of Confirmation ............................................................................................ 2 For the Celebration of Marriage ................................................................................................ 2 The Gloria.................................................................................................................................. 2 Sunday and the Liturgical Year .............................................................................................................. 3 Holy Days of Obligation ......................................................................................................................... 3 Ritual Masses .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The General Instruction of the Roman Missal
    THE GENERAL INSTRUCTION OF THE ROMAN MISSAL THE GENERAL INSTRUCTION OF THE ROMAN MISSAL THE GENERAL INSTRUCTION OF THE ROMAN MISSAL Latin text © Libreria Editrice Vaticana, Vatican City State, 2008. New English Translation 2010, granted recognitio by the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, for the dioceses of the Bishops’ Conference of Canada (Prot. N. 1224/07/L, 18 June 2010). Excerpt from the English translation of The Roman Missal © 2010 International Commission on English in the Liturgy Corporation. All rights reserved. Latin Typical Edition, 1970. Amended Latin Typical Edition, 1971. Second Latin Typical Edition, 1975. Third Latin Typical Edition, 2002. Amended Latin Third Typical Edition, 2008. Illustration by James Tissot (1836-1902), adapted for use in The General Instruction of the Roman Missal, copyright © Concacan Inc., 2011. All rights reserved. The General Instruction of the Roman Missal, Canadian edition, copyright © Concacan Inc., 2011. All rights reserved. Edited by: Published by: National Liturgy Office Publications Service nlo.cccb.ca cccbpublications.ca Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops 2500 Don Reid Drive Ottawa, ON K1H 2J2 cccb.ca Code: 182-373 ISBN: 978-0-88997-655-9 Legal Deposit: Library and Archives Canada, Ottawa Printed and Bound in Canada by St. Joseph Communications 6 THE GENERAL INSTRUCTION OF THE ROMAN MISSAL CANADIAN CONFERENCE OF CATHOLIC BISHOPS CONFÉRENCE DES ÉVÊQUES CATHOLIQUES DU CANADA Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops DECREE OF PUBLICATION AND IMPLEMENTATION
    [Show full text]
  • General Instruction of the Roman Missal
    INSTITUTIO GENERALIS MISSALIS ROMANI THE GENERAL INSTRUCTION OF THE ROMAN MISSAL May 2007 THE ROMAN MISSAL AS RENEWED BY DECREE OF THE SECOND VATICAN ECUMENICAL COUNCIL. PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY OF POPE PAUL VI AND FURTHER REVISED AT THE DIRECTION OF POPE JOHN PAUL II THE GENERAL INSTRUCTION OF THE ROMAN MISSAL INSTITUTIO GENERALIS MISSALIS ROMANI MAY 2007 Australian Catholic Bishops’ Conference Prot. 1198/06/L AUSTRALIAE Instante Excellentissimo Domino Philippo E. Wilson, Archiepiscopo Adelaidensi, Conferentiae Episcoporum Australiae Praeside, litteris 7 iunii 2006 datis, vigore facultatum huic Congregationi a Summo Pontifice BENEDICTO XVI tributarum, textum translationis «Institutionis Generalis Missalis Romani», ex editione typical tertia eiusdem Missalis excerptae, lingus anglica exaratum, prout in adiector exstat exemplari, perlibenter approbamus. Eiusdem insuper textus impressi duo exemplaria ad hanc Congregationem transmittantur. Contrariis quibuslibet minime obstantibus. Ex aedibus Congregationis de Cultu Divino et Disciplina Sacramentorum, die 24 maii 2007. (+ Franciscus Card. Arinze) Praefectus (+Malcolm Ranjith) Archiepiscopus a Secretis - i - - ii - CONTENTS PREAMBLE A Witness to Unchanged Faith 1 A Witness to Unbroken Tradition 3 Adaptation to New Conditions 4 CHAPTER I THE IMPORTANCE AND DIGNITY OF THE EUCHARISTIC CELEBRATION 6 CHAPTER II THE STRUCTURE OF THE MASS, ITS ELEMENTS AND ITS PARTS 8 I. THE GENERAL STRUCTURE OF THE MASS 8 II. THE DIFFERENT ELEMENTS OF THE MASS 8 Reading and Explaining the Word of God 9 The Prayers
    [Show full text]
  • Caeremoniale Episcoporum 1948
    iI i1 » i1 jU /U It F M () [\j I It U I! EPISCOPORUM CLEMENTIS VIII, INNOCENTII ET BENEDICTI XIII 1 X O » | E «N i— 3 M jussu bH P C p . EDITUM 1— ’H 0 -H > U -P P 0 0 3 • BENEDICTI XIV ET LEONIS XIII CO P 0 i- 'H n *H H P 0 • C 0 0 hH AUCTORITATE RECOGNITUM £D n -P o E ar~3 E 0 0 rH H 0 Q E O CJ l-H H 3 co 1— i— CL P E X HH X O Ch 13 1— P CL »— U 'H X 0 O -P P O CL O 0 0 CO © O •H •H O -H EDITIO TERTIA POST TYPICAM e: O TJ C CL CL ZD (!) 0 0 • 0 cr •H C 0 m E o CL 0 P DO U 0 CL 0 GD Csl iH O P © CN 0 i LJ 0 P 0 T3 I i •H cn *H 0 Ui 03 C n cO > • O CL •H X bH CD CL E LJ C X e rH CO m O «H E * 'O u UJ E -H H 3 CM © P 0 P P P *H 0 «E P C •H P «i CJ I— 0 0 •H C P ‘H S 0 O *o CJi 0 •H * O CJ O 0 O H X rH s: c C D U LJ c 0 0 0 tr b-A CD M s: bJ CC CJ 00 in in 03 ^VERSJT^v UNIVERSITAS S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ancient Christian Ritual and Its Theological Meaning in the 21St Century
    The Ancient Christian Ritual and its Theological Meaning in the 21st Century: A Study of the Sign of Peace in the Novus Ordo in the Roman Rite A thesis submitted to the faculty of the Athenaeum of Ohio/Mount St. Mary’s Seminary of the West in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts (Theology) By Duy V-T Nguyen Cincinnati, Ohio May 2017 Abstract The sign of peace has a close connection to the kiss of peace, which was commonly practiced in the early Church. These two expressions also have their origins in the holy kiss, about which the apostle Paul writes in his letters. However, in recent times it has been suggested that the congregation should refrain from the exchange the sign of peace. How could a gesture that is rooted in tradition lose its importance? This study is an analysis of the historical development of the sign of peace since its inception. This is done through an examination of the major texts of the Roman Rite in chronological order, noting the significant developments. Furthermore, this study points out factors that contributed to the rise and the decline of the sign of peace. It also differentiates the sign of peace in the Roman Rite from that of other traditions. This thesis by Duy Vu-Trong Nguyen fulfills the thesis requirement for the master’s degree in Theology and is approved by: Advisor: Rev. Paul Jerome Keller, O.P., S.T.D. Readers: Rev. Benedict O'Cinnsealaigh, S.T.D. Rev. David J. Endres, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume LV June 2019 Archbishop of Washington Most Rev
    Members Most Rev. Wilton D. Gregory, Chair Volume LV June 2019 Archbishop of Washington Most Rev. Leonard P. Blair, Chair-Elect Archbishop of Hartford USCCB Approves Ordination of a Bishop, of Priests, and of Deacons Most Rev. David A. Zubik Bishop of Pittsburgh Most Rev. Daniel E. Thomas At the June 2019 USCCB plenary meeting, the Latin Church bishops of the United Bishop of Toledo States approved the final translation (“Gray Book”) of Ordination of a Bishop, of Most Rev. Mark J. Seitz Priests, and of Deacons, by a vote of 210-5 with one abstention. The text, which was Bishop of El Paso Most Rev. Christopher J. Coyne prepared by the International Commission on English in the Liturgy (ICEL), will be Bishop of Burlington sent to the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments for Most Rev. Joseph M. Siegel Bishop of Evansville the requisite confirmation. Most Rev. Daniel E. Garcia Bishop of Monterey The body of bishops approved minor textual amendments in Ordination, as well as the Most Rev. Andrzej J. Zglejszewski Auxiliary Bishop of Rockville Centre incorporation of emendations resulting from the 1984 Cæremoniale Episcoporum. These emendations provide added clarity to the actions of the ordaining bishop at Consultants various moments in the Ordination rite (i.e., when he puts on or take off his miter, Right Rev. Gregory J. Polan, OSB Abbot Primate of the holds his pastoral staff, etc.). Finally, the sole ritual adaptation currently approved for Benedictine Confederation the United States – allowing those present to assent to the election of a bishop, priest, Right Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • 1962 Missal Sheet
    OUTLINE OF THE 1962 MISSALE ROMANUM Brief history of the rubrical development of the Tridentine Rite after the Council of Trent To understand where the rubrics stand today, it is necessary to understand something of the decisions of the popes in the past. Here are some major highlights: Saint Pius V (1570): Following the Council of Trent (1545-1563) the Tridentine Rite of Mass was promulgated with the Papal Bull, Quo Primum. However, this did not introduce a new rite of Mass, rather it simply codified the Mass as was used in Rome at the time. It also fixed the text of the Ordinary and Canon of the Mass. Clement VIII (1605): Thirty years after Quo Primum, this pope was required to re-issue the official edition of the Tridentine Rite due to grave departures that had occurred, chiefly in the unauthorized substitution of the Itala Vetus texts with that of the new edition of the Vulgate (1592). New feasts were added as was the Common of Nonvirgins and Rubricae Generales, XX. Urban VIII (1634): Again thirty years later another revision was made. The rubrics were simplified, made clearer and brought into conformity with decisions made by the SRC since the time of Urban VIII. The number of feasts were reduced as well, which simplified the calendar. [Caeremoniale Episcoporum]: This book is separate from the Missal and deals with the ceremonies, especially regarding Pontifical Masses and processions, as performed in cathedrals and collegiate churches. It was drawn up between 1496 and 1528 by various papal master of ceremonies and was issued by Clement VIII in 1600.
    [Show full text]
  • Manual of Indulgences
    Manual of Indulgences NORMS AND GRANTS Apostolic Penitentiary Translated into English from the fourth edition (1999) of Enchiridion Indulgentiarum:Normae et Concessiones UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF CATHOLIC BISHOPS Washington, DC CONTENTS Abbreviations Foreword Manual of Indulgences Decree, English Translation Decree, Fourth Editio Typica Introduction Norms on Indulgences The Four General Concessions Introduction The Grants First concession Second concession Third concession Fourth concession Other Concessions Introduction Grants 1. Act of Family Consecration 2. Act of Dedication of the Human Race to Jesus Christ the King Iesu dulcissime, Redemptor 3. Act of Reparation Iesu dulcissime 4. Papal Blessing 5. Days Designated Universally for a Certain Religious Intention 6. Christian Doctrine 7. Eucharistic Adoration and Procession § 1 1° Eucharistic adoration for at least a half hour 2° Holy Thursday 3° Eucharistic procession 4° Eucharistic congress § 2 1° Eucharistic adoration 2° Prayers O sacrum convivium Tantum ergo 8. Eucharistic and Spiritual Communion § 1 1° First Communion 2° Fridays of Lent § 2 1° Act of spiritual communion 2° Act of thanksgiving after Communion Anima Christi En ego, O bone et dulcissime Iesu 9. Examination of Conscience and Act of Contrition 1° Examination of conscience Confiteor, Act of Contrition, Psalm De profundis Psalm Miserere, gradual or penitential psalms 10. Spiritual Exercises and Monthly Recollections § 1 Spiritual exercises § 2 Monthly recollections 11. Week of Prayer for Christian Unity § 1 Plenary indulgence for participation § 2 Partial indulgence for prayer (Omnipotens et misericors Deus) 12. At the Point of Death § 1 A plenary indulgence administered by a priest § 2 When a priest is not available § 3 Commendable use of a crucifix or a cross § 4 Even if another plenary indulgence already obtained on the same day § 5 Instructing the faithful concerning this 13.
    [Show full text]
  • |||GET||| History of the Liturgy the Major Stages 1St Edition
    HISTORY OF THE LITURGY THE MAJOR STAGES 1ST EDITION DOWNLOAD FREE Marcel Metzger | 9780814624333 | | | | | Eucharistic Liturgy and Theology Litvakov, Moses. Above all, Pius reformed the liturgical laws to enable History of the Liturgy The Major Stages 1st edition frequent Communion Sacra Tridentina,and recommended the reception of Communion for children. In the earlier calendar, most of the months were simply called by a number such as "the fifth month". The division into doubles of various kinds semidoubles and simples continued untilwhen Pope Pius XII abolished the rank of semidouble, making all the previous semidoubles simples, and reducing the previous simples to a mere commemoration in the Mass of another feast day or of the feria on which they fell see General Roman Calendar of Pope Pius XII. The first version of the Confirmation Service for the new church was also released intranslated into regional languages and was quickly adopted by the various dioceses. Do you furnish His table with cloths bespangled with gold, while you refuse Him even the most basic coverings? Give Feedback External Websites. An important tradition of liturgical commentaries from the 8th-century Ecclesiastical History of the Patriarch Germanus of Constantinople to the 14th-century commentary by Nicholas Cabasilas has shaped the Byzantine appreciation of the Eucharistic liturgy up to the present. Many of its feasts e. The early liturgical evidence from Spain is not as extensive as other geographical centers. A series of three prayers precedes and follows a meal. Although he did not publish more than a single book, Beauduin's many talks, lectures, and articles in Questions Liturgiques, as well as his influence on the many priests he trained about the liturgy, represent an abiding source for the movement toward the reform of the liturgy that came after him.
    [Show full text]