DOCSLIB.ORG

Creating a Military Service for Space for More Information on This Publication, Visit

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Creating a Military Service for Space for More Information on This Publication, Visit C O R P O R A T I O N MICHAEL SPIRTAS, YOOL KIM, FRANK CAMM, SHIRLEY M. ROSS, DEBRA KNOPMAN, FORREST E. MORGAN, SEBASTIAN JOON BAE, M. SCOTT BOND, JOHN S. CROWN, ELAINE SIMMONS A Separate Space Creating a Military Service for Space For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR4263 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0466-4 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2020 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover: loops7/E+ via Getty Images. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface With the passage of the 2020 National Defense Authorization Act, the U.S. govern- ment will launch a Space Force. In February 2019, President Donald J. Trump directed the Department of Defense to create the Space Force, as an independent service within the Department of the Air Force, “to ensure unfettered access to, and freedom to oper- ate in, space, and to provide vital capabilities to joint and coalition forces in peacetime and across the spectrum of conflict.”1 The Air Force asked the RAND Corporation to assist in its efforts to plan for the creation of the new service. RAND provided analytic support to the U.S. Space Force Planning Task Force to inform efforts to build the Space Force. This report provides recommendations on capabilities that our analysis suggests should be included in the Space Force, considers career field sustainability for the fledgling service, and examines other defense orga- nizations to draw lessons for the Space Force. It also considers what it means to be a service as it seeks to illuminate challenges and opportunities the fledgling Space Force will face. The research reported here was sponsored by Major General Clinton Crosier, Deputy, Deputy Chief of Staff, Strategy, Integration and Requirements, Headquarters U.S. Air Force, and conducted within RAND Project AIR FORCE. RAND Project AIR FORCE RAND Project AIR FORCE (PAF), a division of the RAND Corporation, is the U.S. Air Force’s federally funded research and development center for studies and analyses. PAF provides the Air Force with independent analyses of policy alternatives affecting the development, employment, combat readiness, and support of current and future air, space, and cyber forces. Research is conducted in four programs: Strategy and Doc- trine; Force Modernization and Employment; Manpower, Personnel, and Training; and Resource Management. Additional information about PAF is available on our website: www.rand.org/paf/ 1 White House, Establishment of the United States Space Force, Washington, D.C., Space Policy Directive–4, February 19, 2019. iii iv Creating a Military Service for Space This report documents work originally shared with the U.S. Air Force on Sep- tember 20, 2019. The draft report, issued on September 11, 2019, was reviewed by formal peer reviewers and U.S. Air Force subject-matter experts. Contents Preface ................................................................................................. iii Figures and Tables ...................................................................................vii Summary ............................................................................................. ix Acknowledgments ..................................................................................xiii Abbreviations .........................................................................................xv CHAPTER ONE Introduction ........................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER TWO Contextual Background for the Space Force .................................................... 7 What Is a Service? ...................................................................................... 7 Department of Defense Activities in Space over Time ...........................................10 Toward a Presidential Directive .....................................................................15 CHAPTER THREE Planning for the Force: Analytic Approach for Determining Which Activities Should Transfer to the Space Force .........................................................19 Step 1. Identify Relevant Activities and Units for Analysis: Elements of a Space Force .... 20 Step 2. Develop Organizational Performance Metrics: Defining Success for the Space Force ..............................................................................................21 Step 3. Qualitatively Assess Potential Effects of Transfer on Performance Metrics ......... 26 Step 4. Apply Logic to Determine Which Activities Should Transfer to the Space Force ... 27 CHAPTER FOUR Planning for the Force: Activities and Organizations That Should Transfer to the Space Force .......................................................................................29 Operational and Training Activities ................................................................29 Acquisition Activities .................................................................................41 Major Headquarters Activities ...................................................................... 48 Support Activities .....................................................................................53 Summary .............................................................................................. 54 v vi Creating a Military Service for Space CHAPTER FIVE Career Field Sustainment Within the Space Force ............................................57 Determination of Space Force Officer Career Field Sustainability: RAND’s Model .........58 The Case of 13S (Space Operations) ................................................................61 The Case of 14N (Intelligence Officers) .......................................................... 64 General Officer Throughput ........................................................................67 Challenges .............................................................................................71 Implications for the Space Force ....................................................................73 Conclusions ............................................................................................74 CHAPTER SIX Lessons from the Creation of Other Military Organizations ...............................75 Effectiveness ...........................................................................................75 Efficiency .............................................................................................. 77 Independence ......................................................................................... 77 Identity .................................................................................................78 Size ......................................................................................................79 CHAPTER SEVEN Charting an Adaptive Approach to Implementation .........................................83 Adaptive Planning ................................................................................... 84 Load-Bearing Assumptions on Which the Space Force Will Depend ......................... 88 Signposts .............................................................................................. 90 Shaping Actions ...................................................................................... 92 Hedging Actions ......................................................................................93 Potential Implications ............................................................................... 94 CHAPTER EIGHT Conclusion ............................................................................................95 Space Force Activities and Organization ...........................................................95 Workforce Sustainability Challenges for the Space Force ....................................... 96 Challenges and Opportunities for the Space Force ............................................. 97 Recommendations ................................................................................... 98 Concluding Thoughts .............................................................................. 102 APPENDIXES A. Case Studies: Other Examples of Organizational Change ............................. 103 B. Career Field Sustainability: Acquisition Officers ....................................... 149 Bibliography ......................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SPACE and DEFENSE
    SPACE and DEFENSE Volume Three Number One Summer 2009 Space Deterrence: The Delicate Balance of Risk by Ambassador Roger G. Harrison, Collins G. Shackelford and Deron R. Jackson with commentaries by Dean Cheng Pete Hays John Sheldon Mike Manor and Kurt Neuman Dwight Rauhala and Jonty Kasku-Jackson EISENHOWER CENTER FOR SPACE AND DEFENSE STUDIES Space and Defense Scholarly Journal of the United States Air Force Academy Eisenhower Center for Space and Defense Studies Editor-in-Chief: Ambassador Roger Harrison, [email protected] Director, Eisenhower Center for Space and Defense Studies Academic Editor: Dr. Eligar Sadeh, [email protected] Associate Academic Editors: Dr. Damon Coletta U.S. Air Force Academy, USA Dr. Michael Gleason U.S. Air Force Academy, USA Dr. Peter Hays National Security Space Office, USA Major Deron Jackson U.S. Air Force Academy, USA Dr. Collins Shackelford U.S. Air Force Academy, USA Colonel Michael Smith U.S. Air Force, USA Reviewers: Andrew Aldrin John Logsdon United Launch Alliance, USA George Washington University, USA James Armor Agnieszka Lukaszczyk ATK, USA Space Generation Advisory Council, Austria William Barry Molly Macauley NASA, France Resources for the Future, USA Frans von der Dunk Scott Pace University of Nebraska, USA George Washington University, USA Paul Eckart Xavier Pasco Boeing, USA Foundation for Strategic Research, France Andrew Erickson Wolfgang Rathbeger Naval War College, USA European Space Policy Institute, Austria Joanne Gabrynowicz Scott Trimboli University of Mississippi, USA University
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Training and Operational Proficiency of China's
    C O R P O R A T I O N Assessing the Training and Operational Proficiency of China’s Aerospace Forces Selections from the Inaugural Conference of the China Aerospace Studies Institute (CASI) Edmund J. Burke, Astrid Stuth Cevallos, Mark R. Cozad, Timothy R. Heath For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/CF340 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-0-8330-9549-7 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2016 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface On June 22, 2015, the China Aerospace Studies Institute (CASI), in conjunction with Headquarters, Air Force, held a day-long conference in Arlington, Virginia, titled “Assessing Chinese Aerospace Training and Operational Competence.” The purpose of the conference was to share the results of nine months of research and analysis by RAND researchers and to expose their work to critical review by experts and operators knowledgeable about U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Assessment of Nuclear Deterrence Requirements Committee
    i [H.A.S.C. No. 115–11] MILITARY ASSESSMENT OF NUCLEAR DETERRENCE REQUIREMENTS COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION HEARING HELD MARCH 8, 2017 U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 24–683 WASHINGTON : 2017 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS WILLIAM M. ‘‘MAC’’ THORNBERRY, Texas, Chairman WALTER B. JONES, North Carolina ADAM SMITH, Washington JOE WILSON, South Carolina ROBERT A. BRADY, Pennsylvania FRANK A. LOBIONDO, New Jersey SUSAN A. DAVIS, California ROB BISHOP, Utah JAMES R. LANGEVIN, Rhode Island MICHAEL R. TURNER, Ohio RICK LARSEN, Washington MIKE ROGERS, Alabama JIM COOPER, Tennessee TRENT FRANKS, Arizona MADELEINE Z. BORDALLO, Guam BILL SHUSTER, Pennsylvania JOE COURTNEY, Connecticut K. MICHAEL CONAWAY, Texas NIKI TSONGAS, Massachusetts DOUG LAMBORN, Colorado JOHN GARAMENDI, California ROBERT J. WITTMAN, Virginia JACKIE SPEIER, California DUNCAN HUNTER, California MARC A. VEASEY, Texas MIKE COFFMAN, Colorado TULSI GABBARD, Hawaii VICKY HARTZLER, Missouri BETO O’ROURKE, Texas AUSTIN SCOTT, Georgia DONALD NORCROSS, New Jersey MO BROOKS, Alabama RUBEN GALLEGO, Arizona PAUL COOK, California SETH MOULTON, Massachusetts JIM BRIDENSTINE, Oklahoma COLLEEN HANABUSA, Hawaii BRAD R. WENSTRUP, Ohio CAROL SHEA–PORTER, New Hampshire BRADLEY BYRNE, Alabama JACKY ROSEN, Nevada SAM GRAVES, Missouri A. DONALD MCEACHIN, Virginia ELISE M. STEFANIK, New York SALUD O. CARBAJAL, California MARTHA MCSALLY, Arizona ANTHONY G. BROWN, Maryland STEPHEN KNIGHT, California STEPHANIE N.
    [Show full text]
  • 1St Friday Rocks Schriever at 567-3370
    COLORADO SPRINGS MILITARY NEWSPAPER GROUP Thursday, July 19, 2018 www.csmng.com Vol. 12 No. 29 Did you know? CC call addresses Airmen BACK TO SCHOOL wellness, introduces new CCC Event By Halle Thornton 50th Space Wing Public Affairs Families are invited to a back SCHRIEVER AIR FORCE BASE, Colo. — to school event July 25, 9 a.m. — Col. Jennifer Grant, commander of the 50th noon in the Schriever event center, Space Wing, hosted an all-call to address Building 20. There will be a school Schriever Airmen’s wellness and results of the bus safety demonstration, a K-9 Defense Equal Opportunity Climate Survey at demonstration, a United States Air Schriever Air Force Base, Colorado, July 12. Force Academy falcon display and However, the all-call was kicked off by an resource tables. District 22, Ellicott introduction of Chief Master Sgt. Boston schools will be in attendance to com- Alexander, command chief of the 50th SW, plete registration. The Schriever and gave him the opportunity to introduce AFB Medical Clinic has set aside himself and lay out his expectations of appointments for school physicals. Airmen. Contact the clinic’s appointment line “There is no better time to be in space, we at 524-2273 to make an appointment are the epicenter of space,” he said. “It isn’t for back to school physicals. For happening without Team Schriever. Every day more information, contact Jessica is training camp. We’re champs on a cham- Schroeder at 567-5726. pion team, and we’re the best at what we do.” Alexander expressed gratitude for the chance to serve 50th SW Airmen, and ex- Base Briefs citement for the future.
    [Show full text]
  • The Force Improvement Program Promises Grassroots Fixes For
    Nuclear Force Improvements The Force Improvement Program promises grassroots fi xes for USAF’s nuclear forces. By Amy McCullough, News Editor issileers are cautiously op- The teams visited all three missile voice to airmen who likely didn’t have timistic the latest plan to wings at Malmstrom, F. E. Warren AFB, one before. It’s meant to turn the ICBM reinvigorate the nuclear force Wyo., and Minot AFB, N.D., where culture of severe micromanagement will have lasting effects—but they conducted hundreds of interviews and fear into one of empowerment for after being dubbed the “prob- to determine what challenges exist for all airmen. Mlem child of the Air Force” by numerous airmen in their respective mission areas. “This is a program owned by air- reviews and panels over the years, many The group came up with more than 300 men,” said Wilson. “We have really say they are waiting to see what the future recommendations, which were pitched good people. If we give them the right will really hold. to senior Air Force leaders. Of those, 98 education, training, and experience, if The Air Force launched the Force percent were approved. The recommen- we make sure they are confi dent and Improvement Program in February dations fall into three main categories: proud, [and] if we make sure they are 2014 after an internal investigation inspections, leadership development, personally and professionally fulfi lled, uncovered widespread cheating on a and the personnel reliability program. we [get] mission success.” nuclear proficiency exam at Malm- The changes have been steadily rolling strom AFB, Mont.
    [Show full text]
  • GAO-16-252R, Defense Weather Satellites
    441 G St. N.W. Washington, DC 20548 March 10, 2016 Congressional Committees Defense Weather Satellites: Analysis of Alternatives Is Useful for Certain Capabilities, but Ineffective Coordination Limited Assessment of Two Critical Capabilities The Department of Defense (DOD) uses data from military, U.S. civil government, and international partner satellite sensors to provide critical weather information and forecasts for military operations. As DOD’s primary existing weather satellite system—the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP)—ages and other satellites near their estimated end of life, DOD faces potential gaps in its space-based environmental monitoring (SBEM) capabilities which may affect stakeholders that use SBEM data, including the military services, the intelligence community, and U.S. civil agencies such as the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). After two unsuccessful attempts to develop follow-on programs from 1997 through fiscal year 2012, including the National Polar-orbiting Operational Satellite System (NPOESS), a tri-agency program between DOD, NOAA, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration that was canceled in 2010 because of extensive cost overruns and schedule delays, DOD and other stakeholders who rely on SBEM data are now in a precarious position in which key capabilities require immediate and near-term solutions.1 With potential capability gaps starting as early as this year, it is important for DOD to make decisions in a timely manner, but based on informed analysis that
    [Show full text]
  • Accounting Contributions to World War II
    University of Mississippi eGrove Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2010 The Accounting Profession Goes to War: Accounting Contributions to World War II Mark Ernest Jobe Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd Part of the Accounting Commons Recommended Citation Jobe, Mark Ernest, "The Accounting Profession Goes to War: Accounting Contributions to World War II" (2010). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 151. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd/151 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Mark Jobe entitled “The Accounting Profession Goes to War: Accounting Contributions to World War II.” I have examined the final copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Accountancy. ______________________________ Dr. Dale L. Flesher (Chair) Associate Dean and Professor of Accountancy E. H. Patterson School of Accountancy We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: _____________________________________ Dr. Royce Kurtz Reference Bibliographer and Associate Professor J. D. Williams Library _____________________________________ Dr. Judith Cassidy Associate Professor
    [Show full text]
  • RAND Project AIR FORCE Annual Report 2007
    Annual Report 2007 PROJECT AIR FORCE Annual Report 2007 PROJECT AIR FORCE About RAND Project AIR FORCE he mission of RAND Project AIR FORCE (PAF), a division of the RAND Corporation and the Air Force’s federally funded Tresearch and development center for studies and analysis, is to under- take an integrated program of objective, independent analysis on issues of enduring concern to Air Force leaders. PAF addresses far-reaching and interrelated questions: What will be the role of air and space power in the future security environment? How should the force be modernized to meet changing operational demands? What should be the size and char- acteristics of the workforce? How can that workforce be most effectively recruited, trained, and retained? How should sustainment, acquisition, and infrastructure be streamlined to control costs? PAF carries out its research agenda in four programs that represent core competencies: Strategy and Doctrine seeks to increase knowledge and understanding of geopolitical and other problems in the national security environment that affect Air Force operations. PAF maintains expertise in defense strategy; regional analysis; the objectives and tasks of evolving joint oper- ations; and the potential contributions of air and space power to joint operations, defense planning, and requirements for force development. Aerospace Force Development identifies and assesses ways in which technological advances and new operational concepts can improve the Air Force’s ability to satisfy a range of future operational demands. This research involves assessments of technology feasibility, performance, cost, and risk. PAF assesses major force components needed in the future and the systems and infrastructure supporting their operations.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories
    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND ITS ANTECEDENTS PUBLISHED AND PRINTED UNIT HISTORIES A BIBLIOGRAPHY EXPANDED & REVISED EDITION compiled by James T. Controvich January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS User's Guide................................................................................................................................1 I. Named Commands .......................................................................................................................4 II. Numbered Air Forces ................................................................................................................ 20 III. Numbered Commands .............................................................................................................. 41 IV. Air Divisions ............................................................................................................................. 45 V. Wings ........................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. Groups ..................................................................................................................................... 69 VII. Squadrons..............................................................................................................................122 VIII. Aviation Engineers................................................................................................................ 179 IX. Womens Army Corps............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • BUCKLEY AIR FORCE BASE : Colorado
    Military Asset List 2016 U.S. Air Force BUCKLEY AIR FORCE BASE : Colorado Buckley Air Force Base (AFB) is located in Aurora, Colorado, near the City of Denver. It was originally named Buckley Field in honor of 1st Lt. John H. Buckley, a pilot who was killed during World War 1. The 460th Space Wing is the current host wing of the base. fter World War II, the U.S. Army no longer had a need for Buckley Field, and it was put on inactive status. Most of the buildings and structures were demolished. In 1946, the Colorado Above: The radomes on Buckley AFB, Air National Guard situated in clusters across the horizon, are acquired Buckley Field. It large geodesic domes that contain satellite became evident soon network tracking and intelligence equipment. Data collected is used to detect and report thereafter that the state information on threats to the United States could not support the and allied nations. (U.S. Air Force photo) installation and in 1947, it Left: The radomes, lightly referred to as “golf was taken over by the U.S. Navy and renamed Naval Air Station- balls”, on Buckley Air Force Base house and Denver, serving as the headquarters for the Naval Air Reserve. protect satellite dishes and other crucial The Navy decomissioned NAS-Denver in 1959 and returned the space operations equipment. The purpose of the giant spheres is to protect the equipment base to the management of the COANG, subsequently being from Colorado’s ever-changing weather. renamed Buckley Air National Guard Base. Without this protective shell around the The 460th Air Base Wing was activated in 2000, and Buckley satellite dishes, the Airmen could not properly complete their jobs in all-weather situations ANG Base transitioned to an active U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Commands and Air National Guard
    2019 USAF ALMANAC MAJOR COMMANDS AND AIR NATIONAL GUARD Pilots from the 388th Fighter Wing’s, 4th Fighter Squadron prepare to lead Red Flag 19-1, the Air Force’s premier combat exercise, at Nellis AFB, Nev. Photo: R. Nial Bradshaw/USAF R.Photo: Nial The Air Force has 10 major commands and two Air Reserve Components. (Air Force Reserve Command is both a majcom and an ARC.) ACRONYMS AA active associate: CFACC combined force air evasion, resistance, and NOSS network operations security ANG/AFRC owned aircraft component commander escape specialists) squadron AATTC Advanced Airlift Tactics CRF centralized repair facility GEODSS Ground-based Electro- PARCS Perimeter Acquisition Training Center CRG contingency response group Optical Deep Space Radar Attack AEHF Advanced Extremely High CRTC Combat Readiness Training Surveillance system Characterization System Frequency Center GPS Global Positioning System RAOC regional Air Operations Center AFS Air Force Station CSO combat systems officer GSSAP Geosynchronous Space ROTC Reserve Officer Training Corps ALCF airlift control flight CW combat weather Situational Awareness SBIRS Space Based Infrared System AOC/G/S air and space operations DCGS Distributed Common Program SCMS supply chain management center/group/squadron Ground Station ISR intelligence, surveillance, squadron ARB Air Reserve Base DMSP Defense Meteorological and reconnaissance SBSS Space Based Surveillance ATCS air traffic control squadron Satellite Program JB Joint Base System BM battle management DSCS Defense Satellite JBSA Joint Base
    [Show full text]
  • Pushing a Pull System Transforming Marine Aviation Logistics Douglas S
    LOGISTICS Pushing a Pull System Transforming Marine Aviation Logistics Douglas S. Steward by air, sea, or land. More is not always better, especially when it is the wrong stuff. Without improvements to ex- isting logistics doctrine, combatant commanders cannot leverage the full potential of their aviation weapon sys- tems. Additionally, with a greater presence of unmanned weapon systems, it makes sense that supporting logistics systems also place fewer personnel in harm’s way. The Marine Aviation Logistics Support Program is trans- forming to align with core doctrine changes and concepts such as distributed and prolonged operations, expedition- ary maneuver warfare, and sea basing. The goal of the new design, MALSP II, is to provide logistics support to deployed and non-deployed core capable units at higher levels of performance while also decreasing the infrastruc- ture and resource inventory. In January 2007, the Aviation Logistics Support Branch of Headquarters, Marine Corps, chartered the Aviation Logistics Transition Task Force and, in conjunction with Naval Air Systems Command, stood up the MALSP II Project Office to manage MALSP II improvements and program changes. Together, these activities form an architecture that identifies warfighting processes and relationships, relates systems to operational requirements, and describes standards and protocols. The architecture assists warfighters and program managers in communicating operational concepts to system develop- ers, and provides an analytic basis for discussions and decisions. The “As-Is” Design The current MALSP design is a “push” system that relies on subjective forecasts and anecdotal evidence to support its forces. This just-in-case approach has resulted in the following logistics support characteristics: • Days-of-usage depth • Fixed-allowanced resource packages • Heavy footprint • Reactive system.
    [Show full text]