DOCSLIB.ORG

The Terrible Carnage Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Terrible Carnage Of The Terrible Carnage of Hue NDIC A K R NDE A ALEX A Marine M67A2 flame tank, number F-32, of Headquarters and Service Co, 3d Tank Bn, commanded by Cpl Charles West, spews flame at a Com- munist position during the heavy fighting in the streets of Hue during the 1968 Tet Offensive. By R. R. Keene guests can sit on the veranda in the 11­blocks­wide and eight­to­nine­ luxury for which Southeast Asia is blocks­deep fighting that followed the This is the conclusion of a two-part famous, drinking aperitifs, smoking combat described in Part I of this article. See Part I, “Golf Company at cigars and admiring the sunset behind article. Hue,” in the June 2013 Leatherneck. the Citadel as the view of Trang Tien There was fighting everywhere. They Bridge becomes bathed in changing had never fought house to house or “The stink—you had to load up so lights, and candle­lit paper lanterns float building to building. According to many wounded, the blood would dry on the water, guiding dragon­headed Cap tain Charles L. “Chuck” Meadows, on your hands. In two or three days restaurant barges carrying diners up the commanding officer of Golf Co, you would smell like death itself.”—A river. “We were out of our element.” But, Marine at Hue, as quoted in “U.S. For returning veterans of the Vietnam then too, so were the Bo Doi—regulars Marines in Vietnam: The Defining War, there comes a subtle realization of the North Vietnamese infantry. Year, 1968” that there is no longer that gnawing Enter Lieutenant Colonel Ernest C. feeling of fear that accompanied them “Ernie” Cheatham Jr., Commanding here are several great hotels in in their combat tour. Hue and Vietnam Officer, 2/5, up from the Troi River Hue. With tour groups going to are beautiful. south of Phu Bai where Communist T Vietnam, Military Historical But, in 1968, carnage is the word for forces had hit Marine and South Viet­ Tours always has booked into the what happened at Hue. namese units the night of 30­31 Jan. Huong Giang Hotel Resort and Spa, Company G, 2d Battalion, Fifth Ma­ 1968. Cheatham was a big man: a formerly the Army of the Republic of rine Regiment, after reaching the Citadel former defensive tackle with the Pitts­ Vietnam (ARVN) bachelor officers’ and under heavy fire, went back across burgh Steelers and the Baltimore Colts quarters and site of the U.S. Navy’s the river to the Military Assistance Com­ in the mid­1950s, who gave up football landing craft, utility (LCU) ramp dur­ mand Vietnam (MACV) compound. to be a Marine. The Corps was his ing the Vietnam War. This is the further account of “Golf” vocation, and he was known to be tac­ The Huong Giang sits on the south Co, 2d Bn and its sister companies of tically smart and innovative, but he bank of the River of Perfume. Today, 5th Marines and the street­to­street, had never fought in a city. 36 LEATHERNECK JULY 2013 www.mca-marines.org/leatherneck For the Battle of Hue, he scrounged for field manuals and came up with two: “Combat in Built­Up Areas” and “Attack on a Fortified Position.” They weren’t much, but the books provided three basic rules for conducting combat in a built­up area: isolate the battlefield, seize footholds and conduct systematic clearing operations. Cheatham reshaped that advice, according to author Eric Hammel in his book “Fire in the Streets,” to “gas the enemy, blow things up and then clear out the ruins.” He ordered up the battalion’s 106 mm recoilless rifles, every CS tear gas grenade and gas masks, composition C­4 plastique explosives, every M79 grenade and hand grenade, even obsolescent rifle grenades. Cheatham also broke out 3.5­inch rocket launchers to supplement his M72 Light Anti­Armor Weapons. He was going to C need it all. USM Back in the MACV compound, G/2/5 Above: Leathernecks of 5th Marines muscled a 300-pound 106 mm recoilless rifle up to the second floor corpsman “Doc” Bruce Grant Jr. was of the University of Hue to get a better firing position on the treasury building just down the street. Once assigned to assist with the wounded from the weapon was sighted in, they hooked up a 20-foot string lanyard and backed out of the classroom the fighting across the river. There were and down the hall. The back blast collapsed the classroom and tore out the walls—the treasury building many: Marines, U.S. and ARVN soldiers withstood the round. and civilians. Marines were hot­wiring Below: On 6 Feb., Golf Co stormed the provincial prison, fighting its way in to take on the added problem vehicles and using them for medical evacuation. They needed all the help they of sorting Communist soldiers and sympathizers from criminals and political prisoners. The process could get. started by lining everyone up against the walls. Doc Grant remembers seeing a Vietna­ mese man wearing an ARVN uniform and the red beret of the airborne battalion. He claimed to be a doctor. Grant asked him his name, and he replied, “First Lieutenant Doan Van Ba.” “Ba?” said Grant. “Doesn’t ba mean woman?” Ba smiled and waded into the wounded, helping triage. At 0700, 1 Feb., elements of Golf Co with two M48 Marine tanks set off toward the jail and provincial building six blocks down Le Loi Street. Word had been passed to relieve a small pocket of South Vietna­ ON mese holding out in the Thua Thien pro­ rs ETE P vincial prison and to liberate the nearby province administration complex. am “We didn’t get one block … before we WILLI PL started getting sniper fire,” said an M79 C grenadier in “U.S. Marines in Vietnam: journalists, Catherine Leroy and Francois fast­moving tactical aircraft laden with The Defining Year, 1968.” Mazure, joined the convoys headed into rockets, bombs and napalm. “We got a tank … got a block, turned Hue. They claimed they had “wandered” However, the weather hadn’t cleared. A right and received 57 mm recoilless which into the North Vietnamese lines and were fine rain mist coated the chilled Marines put out our tank.” The Marines went back captured. Leroy talked their way out and and enshrouded the city in an eerie bank to the MACV compound. emerged as the first newsperson to take of fog. That night the North Vietnamese photos of the Bo Doi in Hue. The story Today, across and down the street from dropped the Bach Ho Railroad Bridge made the cover of Life magazine. the home for old communist soldiers, pre­ into the River of Perfume, but south of On 3 Feb., the South Vietnamese lifted viously known as the MACV compound, Hue, the bridge on Highway 1 that crossed all restrictions on fire support south of is the Saigon Morin, another of Hue’s great the Phu Cam Canal still was unscathed the River of Perfume. It opened the way hotels. Renowned for its excellent brunch and the American forces were streaming for support from up to 8­inch howitzers, and evening steaks, it stands on the corner troops and supplies across. Two French naval gunfire and, if the weather cleared, of Le Loi Street overlooking the Trang www.mca-marines.org/leatherneck JULY 2013 LEATHERNECK 37 dangerously fully elevated for targets just across the street. EL Across the street, the Bo Doi were ticks D ensconced in the treasury and post office A buildings designed to withstand just about IT anything while providing excellent fields C LCU ramp/ARVN BOQ/ D E I G N of fire down the streets. The Marines threw Huong Giang Hotel R Thuong Tu E N everything and then assaulted, five or six Gate G R times. According to his statement in “U.S. I V E R Marines in Vietnam: The Defining Year, Nguyen Hoang Imperial Palace ll 1968,” LtCol Cheatham said, “That means a Bridge l W mustering everybody’s courage and energy e ad it C MACV compound/old soldiers home up. ... You’d assault and back you’d come, . Viet Cong St drag your wounded and then muster it up oi University of Hue/Hotel Saigon Morin L flag Le E Jeanne d’Arc High School/Imperial Hotel again and try it again.” 1 M Treasury/Post Office In the university, Golf Co Marines U H F un R g muscled a 300­plus­pound 106 recoilless E Vuong P Hospital Complex B F lv rifle up a staircase to a classroom over­ O Provincial Prison d. ER looking the treasury. The Marines would RIV Thua Thien Provincial Admin Complex 1 mark a target with the 106’s .50­caliber L Viet Cong y T h flag u traffic circle and tracer spotting rounds. It dawned on Staff o n g gas station K Sergeant James Long that the 106 mm i e t S Catholic cathedral t rifle’s back blast was going to devastate to Bach Ho . Railroad Bridge P An Cuu Bridge the room and anyone dumb enough to be HU CAM NAL CA in it. The Ma rines improvised, firing the railroad 1 OE R 106 mm recoilless rifle with a lanyard. ON M And, while the round took out the NVA, ON its back blast took out the rear wall, col­ JAS lapsing the build ing. The leathernecks just Tien Bridge. The marble­colored, multi­ The leathernecks slowly continued dug out the rifle and continued the fight.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2014 By
    MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2014 By: Representatives Jennings, Alday, Bain, To: Rules Baker, Beckett, Bell, Bennett, Bounds, Boyd, Brown (66th), Byrd, Calhoun, Carpenter, Chism, Clark, Currie, DeBar, Denny, Dixon, Evans (43rd), Evans (91st), Formby, Gibbs, Gipson, Guice, Hamilton, Haney, Hood, Horne, Howell, Kinkade, Ladner, Martinson, Massengill, Mayo, Middleton, Miles, Moore, Oberhousen, Pigott, Powell, Rogers (14th), Rogers (61st), Rushing, Shirley, Shows, Smith (39th), Staples, Steverson, Straughter, Sullivan, Taylor, Thomas, Turner, Watson, Weathersby, Willis, Zuber HOUSE RESOLUTION NO. 53 1 A RESOLUTION COMMEMORATING THE 50TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE 2 VIETNAM WAR. 3 WHEREAS, it is the custom of this Legislative Body to honor 4 those who served in the American Armed Forces during wartime and 5 strengthen our shared commitment to the exercise of freedom, and 6 therefore the Mississippi House of Representatives commemorates 7 the 50th Anniversary of the Vietnam War; and 8 WHEREAS, Mississippi House of Representatives members Mac 9 Huddleston (United States Army Captain - 1966-67), Manly Barton 10 (United States Army Specialist 5 - 1969-70), Thomas G. Taylor 11 (United States Army Specialist 5 - 1968-69), Representative Rufus 12 Straughter's brother, Robert Laurence Straughter (United States 13 Army First Sergeant) and Representative Wanda Jennings' husband 14 Terry Jennings (United States Air Force Captain) each bravely and 15 patriotically served in Vietnam; and 16 WHEREAS, in the late 1950s, the United States began sending
    [Show full text]
  • FRATERNITIES Carstens
    m _ edseodestt whe sepas the letter @t Maysee flaith Bad pinsw0 *ie aft Us enm tsee UP&U bwad wima-&imips1 ed t 000ta by er ber at whnne *ate fad both,"1110r110119"M mudt without. do usht net bb h h la W Wesatm112,0am has e the "am ofterams esm- * 'Dd him come W she said, and then been Ons in 4 bte" a fee-Illmmme a 4bvn--ai Mgea Sone of the maids of he the at thimrtu ofs0 ase a t be 1T. "evhgo de isn- temporary bath led a m dU- wh See waS esat to each m 1er et the esb- went to gli the mesenger Into the lsser who ghter-h&* 'a wwa hs' blood. wof I usaw m of the two tents of festval she added. bath made o she is ToU-q0-- a , bm his- **m7~TheIlulmef aemin cemnib- "And where Is-the'ma r you." Ie a towar the MareemA, BathM 944Wo baentehodAM LaVIARSIXh et PyM,aw atdtismA ~mmn-y. Adigagoswh.gnot tuigase with a, It was Yvette who answered ber. who stood u whSS anTraR TheI to a 100110 s-m 4101 yeaw ag& Some n"4aa 'Do not hear?' she erled, clapping at-the anddea fduf&panm. Vri mosame be itramarred M' aamhabemPto 8m-I he of a you wRi the harbt t t" eamtr Maes, No. of ts and Is her hands with pleasurw "His people are boy, slay YoeIldn 2, Hity, wt He bringing him up In triumph. Do you hear And at the wonhe preciptated Mise rec"neftd as me at the most sette aGd leg.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Barrel Roll
    In 1962, the United States began a “secret war” in Laos. The operation wasn’t revealed until 1970, by which time it con- sumed half of all US attack sorties in Southeast Asia. Barrel Roll By John T. Correll n early 1961, the hot spot of lead- ing concern in Southeast Asia was not Vietnam but Laos. The new US President, John IF. Kennedy, rated Laos as “the most im- mediate of the problems that we found upon taking office” in January. On March 23, Kennedy held a news conference, nationally televised, to talk about Laos. He pointed out the communist advance on a large map. The Pathet Lao insur- gents, supported by the Russians and the North Vietnamese, had captured the northeastern part of the country. “Laos is far away from America, but the world is small,” Kennedy said. “The security of all Southeast Asia will be endangered if Laos loses its neutral independence. Its own safety runs with the safety of us all, in real neutrality observed by all.” In itself, Laos had little strategic im- portance. It was remote and landlocked, with a population of only two million. However, it shared borders with six other countries and had traditionally served as a buffer zone between the more powerful neighboring states. Thousands of ancient stone jars dot the plains in the center of Laos. The real concern about Laos was that the insurgency would spread and destabilize the rest of the region. “If the group, about 750 people, left promptly, pilots flying air support for the Laotian communists [are] able to move in and but no more than 40 of the 7,000 North ground forces.
    [Show full text]
  • GREGORY the Natures of War FINAL May 2015
    !1 The Natures of War Derek Gregory for Neil 1 In his too short life, Neil Smith had much to say about both nature and war: from his seminal discussion of ‘the production of nature’ in his first book, Uneven development, to his dissections of war in the twentieth and early twenty-first centuries in American Empire – where he identified the ends of the First and Second World Wars as crucial punctuations in the modern genealogy of globalisation – and its coda, The endgame of globalization, a critique of America’s wars conducted in the shadows of 9/11. 2 And yet, surprisingly, he never linked the two. He was of course aware of their connections. He always insisted that the capitalist production of nature, like that of space, was never – could not be – a purely domestic matter, and he emphasised that the modern projects of colonialism and imperialism depended upon often spectacular displays of military violence. But he did not explore those relations in any systematic or substantive fashion. He was not alone. The great Marxist critic Raymond Williams once famously identified ‘nature’ as ‘perhaps the most complex word in the [English] language.’ Since he wrote, countless commentators have elaborated on its complexities, but few of them 1 This is a revised and extended version of the first Neil Smith Lecture, delivered at the University of St Andrews – Neil’s alma mater – on 14 November 2013. I am grateful to Catriona Gold for research assistance on the Western Desert, to Paige Patchin for lively discussions about porno-tropicality and the Vietnam war, and to Noel Castree, Dan Clayton, Deb Cowen, Isla Forsyth, Gastón Gordillo, Jaimie Gregory, Craig Jones, Stephen Legg and the editorial collective of Antipode for radically improving my early drafts.
    [Show full text]
  • The North Korean Nuclear Crisis: Past Failures, Present Solutions
    Saint Louis University Law Journal Volume 50 Number 2 A Tribute to the Honorable Michael A. Article 16 Wolff (Winter 2006) 2006 The North Korean Nuclear Crisis: Past Failures, Present Solutions Morse Tan The University of Texas at Austin School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.slu.edu/lj Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Morse Tan, The North Korean Nuclear Crisis: Past Failures, Present Solutions, 50 St. Louis U. L.J. (2006). Available at: https://scholarship.law.slu.edu/lj/vol50/iss2/16 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Saint Louis University Law Journal by an authorized editor of Scholarship Commons. For more information, please contact Susie Lee. SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW THE NORTH KOREAN NUCLEAR CRISIS: PAST FAILURES, PRESENT SOLUTIONS MORSE TAN* ABSTRACT North Korea has recently announced that it has developed nuclear weapons and has pulled out of the six-party talks. These events do not emerge out of a vacuum, and this Article lends perspective through an interdisciplinary lens that seeks to grapple with the complexities and provide constructive approaches based on this well-researched understanding. This Article analyzes political, military, historical, legal and other angles of this international crisis. Past dealings with North Korea have been unfruitful because other nations do not recognize the ties between North Korean acts and its ideology and objectives. For a satisfactory resolution to the current crisis, South Korea and the United States must maintain sufficient deterrence, focus on multi-lateral and international avenues, and increase the negative and later positive incentives for North Korean compliance with its international obligations.
    [Show full text]
  • Vietnam: Tet Offensive Resource Packet
    Virginians at War Vietnam: Tet Offensive Resource Packet Contains: Glossary, Timeline, Images, Discussion Questions, Additional Resources Program Description: Virginians at War: The Tet Offensive explores the experience of Virginians that fought during the critical Tet Offensive in 1968, a turning point of the Vietnam War. Launched by the North Vietnamese Army on 30 January, the coordinated attack against thirteen different provincial capitals throughout South Vietnam took Americans and South Vietnamese by surprise. The result was a costly, long campaign that ended in a hard –fought military victory for the United States and South Vietnamese. However, the outcome of the campaign had a significantly negative impact on support for the war in the United States, from which the nation would not fully recover. Copyright: Virginia War Memorial Foundation, 2006 Length: 18:59 Streaming link: https://vimeo.com/367038067 Featured Speakers: MSG Lonnie S. Ashton, Montross SPC Orthea Harcum, Richmond MSG Lauren P. Bands, Colonial Heights LT Hugh D. Keogh, Midlothian COL Robert C. Barrett, Jr., Colonial Heights SGT Prentis Lee, Clifton LT COL Frank S. Blair, Richmond SP/4 Powhatan “Red Cloud” Owen, Charles City MSG Charles M. Carter, Warsaw SGM Douglass I. Randolph, Charlotte Court House SGT Earl E. Cousins, Ashland MAJ John A. Rawls, M.D., Mechanicsville CPT James H. Dement, Jr., Richmond 1st LT Cathie Lynn Solomonson, R.N., Woodbridge 1st LT Daniel G. Doyle, Richmond 1st LT James F. Walker, Roanoke LT COL John D. Edgerton, Williamsburg For a transcript of this program and more information on the Vietnam War, please visit vawarmemorial.org/learn/resources/vietnam.
    [Show full text]
  • FM 3-24.2. Tactics in Counterinsurgency
    FM 3-24.2 (FM 90-8, FM 7-98) TACTICS IN COUNTERINSURGENCY APRIL 2009 DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release, distribution is unlimited. HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY This publication is available at Army Knowledge Online (www.us.army.mil) and General Dennis J. Reimer Training and Doctrine Digital Library at (www.train.army.mil). * FM 3-24.2 (FM 90-8, FM 7-98) Field Manual Headquarters Department of the Army No. 3-24.2 Washington, DC, 21 April 2009 Tactics in Counterinsurgency Contents Page PREFACE ................................................................................................................. viii INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... ix Chapter 1 OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT OF COUNTERINSURGENCY ........................... 1-1 Section I—OVERVIEW ............................................................................................. 1-1 Insurgency........................................................................................................... 1-1 Counterinsurgency .............................................................................................. 1-2 Influences on Current Operational Environments ............................................... 1-2 Section II—OPERATIONAL AND MISSION VARIABLES ..................................... 1-3 Operational Variables ......................................................................................... 1-3 Mission Variables ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Airpower in Three Wars
    AIRPOWER IN THREE WARS GENERAL WILLIAM W. MOMYER USAF, RET. Reprint Edition EDITORS: MANAGING EDITOR - LT COL A. J. C. LAVALLE, MS TEXTUAL EDITOR - MAJOR JAMES C. GASTON, PHD ILLUSTRATED BY: LT COL A. J. C. LAVALLE Air University Press Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama April 2003 Air University Library Cataloging Data Momyer, William W. Airpower in three wars / William W. Momyer ; managing editor, A. J. C. Lavalle ; textual editor, James C. Gaston ; illustrated by A. J. C. Lavalle–– Reprinted. p. ; cm. With a new preface. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-58566-116-3 1. Airpower. 2. World War, 1939–1945––Aerial operations. 3. Korean War. 1950–1953––Aerial operations. 4. Vietnamese Conflict, 1961–1975––Aerial oper- ations. 5. Momyer, William W. 6. Aeronautics, Military––United States. I. Title. II. Lavalle, A. J. C. (Arthur J. C.), 1940– III. Gaston, James C. 358.4/009/04––dc21 Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public release. Air University Press 131 West Shumacher Avenue Maxwell AFB AL 36112-6615 http://aupress.maxwell.af.mil ii TO . all those brave airmen who fought their battles in the skies for command of the air in World War II, Korea, and Vietnam. iii THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK PREFACE 2003 When I received the request to update my 1978 foreword to this book, I thought it might be useful to give my perspective of some aspects on the employment of airpower in the Persian Gulf War, the Air War over Serbia (Operation Allied Force), and the war in Afghanistan (Operation Enduring Freedom).
    [Show full text]
  • Vietnam War US Army Video Log Michael Momparler Born
    Video Log Michael Momparler Vietnam War U.S. Army Born: 03/05/1947 Interviewed on 11/20/2012 Interviewed by: George Jones 00:00:00 Introduction 00:00:23 Michael Momparler’s highest rank was 1st Lieutenant. 00:00:35 Momparler served in III Corps in Vietnam 00:00:45 Momparler was living in College Point, NY when he enlisted in the Army on 4/18/1966. He joined because he was a wild teenager with legal problems and few other options 00:01:45 Momparler discusses first days in the U.S. Army and his thoughts about the experience and the military experiences of other family members; specifically a cousin who suffered the loss of six fellow Marines. 00:03:23 Momparler discusses basic training experiences like using monkey bars, the mile run, and KP. 00:04:40 Momparler discusses being selected for Officer Candidate School - OCS. Mentions the testing and that he was encouraged to tell the interviewing officer that the war in Vietnam should be escalated. Entered OCS at age 19. 00:05:50 Momparler transition from basic training to advanced infrantry training to OCS. 00:06:24 Momparler discusses experiences with the M-14, M-15, and M-16 rifles. 00:07:00 Momparler discusses the experience of Officer Candidate School. 00:10:32 Momparler mentions that one of his commanding officers was in the Bay of Pigs invasion. Discusses the amount of combat experience, or Vietnam experience of his commanding officers at OCS. 00:11:00 Momparler discusses how OCS candidates used the OCS experience to limit their amount of time in the Army or avoid having to serve in Vietnam.
    [Show full text]
  • How Important Was the Tet Offensive of 1968 in Changing US Policy in Vietnam?
    How important was the Tet offensive of 1968 in changing US policy in Vietnam? An answer given a mark in Level 5 of the published mark scheme The Tet offensive which began at the end of January 1968 was the largest operation of the war in Vietnam to date. The Vietcong launched a massive attack on towns and cities throughout South Vietnam which stunned the US government and their commanders in Vietnam, especially as there was meant to be a two-day ceasefire for the Tet festival. Although the offensive was a military disaster for the Vietcong, who suffered massive casualties, it had major effects on US policy. The attacks on the south continued for many months and had the effect of dramatically changing US military and political policies towards the whole Vietnam war. EXAMINER COMMENT The introduction is focused on the question. It outlines briefly and effectively the nature of the Tet offensive and notes that it had military and political implications for the US government. At first Tet was a great success for the North Vietnamese. In Saigon, they took over many important buildings, including the US embassy (though only for a few hours before being repulsed by US marines), many important government buildings, the presidential palace and the airfield. It took three weeks for the US and ARVN troops to remove the VC from Saigon. The largest battle of the entire war took place in Hué, which the VC held for a month. They executed over 5,000 civilians loyal to the South Vietnamese, and when the ARVN took the city they killed far more people who they thought had collaborated with the VC.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tet Offensive 1968
    The Tet Offensive 1968 Early in 1968 the Communists launched a major offensive to coincide with the traditional Vietnamese New Year celebrations (29 to 31 January). It was a time of an agreed cease-fire. NVA/VC suicide troops struck in Saigon, Hue was temporarily occupied, news media reported immense damage in the South, and 19 suicide sappers broke into the compound of the American Embassy. They were all killed. In all 80 different cities, towns or military bases were attacked, more or less simultaneously. The people of the South refused to rally to the cause as the NVA leaders had hoped and the whole thing was a military disaster. NVA General Giap was devastated. He felt that the gamble was a total waste. It was a resounding defeat for the NVA and VC. And then Walter Cronkite, America's most respected journalist at that time, suggested that America wasn't winning the war. It was inaccurate, based on a 30 second TV grab and was not much better than stupid as the figures will show. However it created the first significant crack in President Johnson's belief that he could win both the war and re-election. As it turned out he did neither. Growing reluctance in America to support a war it wasn't winning, combined with Johnson's new reticence and a NVA fresh surge of hope that these things bought, meant that the beginning of the end had been reached. Losses during Tet Offensive Country/Force Killed Wounded Missing US, Korea, Australia 1,536 7,764 11 South Viet Nam 2,788 8,299 587 North Viet Nam /Viet Cong 45,000 not known not known Civilian 14,000 24,000 Homeless 630,000 Hanoi was perfectly aware of the growing US peace movement and of the deep divisions the war was causing in American society.
    [Show full text]
  • Vietnam WAR Fact Sheet
    Vietnam WAR Fact Sheet † US Troops Who Served in South Vietnam January 1965 – March 1973: 2,594,000 * US Troops from Wisconsin who served in Vietnam: 165,400 * Surviving Vietnam Veterans who are disabled: 11% Average age of the Vietnam War GI: † 19 US Casualties † Killed in Action 47,418 Non-hostile Deaths 10,811 Hospitalized Wounded 153,329 Non-Hospitalized Wounded 150,375 Missing in Action 2338 (at war’s end) Prisoners of War 766 (114 died in captivity) Wisconsin Casualties Killed in Action ‡ 1241 – Missing in Action # 37 Timeline 1950 – 1975 † Beginning of US advisory war in Vietnam. AUG 1950 Battle of Dien Bien Phu. First US casualties in advisory war. MAR – MAY 1954 Gulf of Tonkin Incident. Beginning of US combat operations. AUG 1964 First US POW taken. Operation Rolling Thunder begins bombing raids on North Vietnam. MAR 1965 Marines land at Da Nang. Start of the ground war. MAR 1965 Operation Game Warden begins US Navy inland waterway interdiction. APR 1966 Battle of Khe Sanh. Marines come under siege for 77 days. US KIA 205. JAN – APR 1968 Tet Offensive. US KIA 3,895. Turning point in the war. JAN – FEB 1968 Operation Rolling Thunder Ends. OCT 1968 Battle of Hamburger Hill. After 11 assaults, 1000 troops of the 101st Airborne MAY 1969 capture Hill 937 in the A Shau Valley. US KIA 70. US Navy ends inland waterway combat. DEC 1970 Operation Linebacker/Linebacker I/Linebacker II. Throughout 1972 Concentrated bombing of North Vietnam. Operation Homecoming begins. Release of US POWs. FEB 1973 Last US Ground Troops Leave Vietnam.
    [Show full text]