ISSUE No.

U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice

256

National Institute of Justice Journal

Missing Persons and Unidentified Remains: The Nation’s Silent Mass Disaster by Nancy Ritter

Making Every Encounter Count: Building Trust and Confidence in the Police by Jake Horowitz Sexual Assault in Abusive Relationships by Lauren R. Taylor with Nicole Gaskin-Laniyan Online DNA Training Targets Lawyers, Judges by Glenn R. Schmitt Identifying Remains: Lessons Learned From 9/11 by Nancy Ritter U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs

810 Seventh Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20531

Alberto R. Gonzales Attorney General

Regina B. Schofield Assistant Attorney General

Glenn R. Schmitt Acting Director, National Institute of Justice

This and other publications and products of the National Institute of Justice can be found at:

National Institute of Justice www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij

Office of Justice Programs Partnerships for Safer Communities www.ojp.usdoj.gov

JR 216522 2 0 0 7

ISSUE No. 256 Director’s Message

Making a difference in the lives of individual Americans. Although this phrase may define the core mission of many governmental agencies, it is used so often that, at times, the meaning can feel hackneyed and diluted. But in this issue of the Journal, you will see real examples of how NIJ’s work makes a difference in the lives of real people—people like Melody Reilly, who recently sat in a Texas courtroom to watch the sentencing of the men who murdered her brother and dumped his body in a field. The Center for Human Identification, an NIJ-supported forensic laboratory that uses the most advanced DNA technologies to solve missing persons and unidentified human remains cases, was able to identify Shawn Reilly’s bones ... and help bring his killers to justice. Learn more about the Center for Human Identification in our lead article, “Missing Persons and Unidentified Remains: The Nation’s Silent Mass Disaster,” and how the services of this unique DNA laboratory are available to every law enforcement officer, medical examiner, and coroner in the country. Another example of DNA technology making a difference in individual lives occurred on a tragically grand scale on September 11, 2001. On the 5th anniversary of the terrorist attacks, NIJ published a major report on how DNA was used to identify the victims. But this report is much more than a historical document. It also looks to the future, offering guidance from an NIJ-supported panel of forensic experts on how to prepare for another large-scale DNA identification effort, whether from a terrorist attack, a mass transporta- tion accident, or a natural disaster. Our story “Identifying Remains: Lessons Learned From 9/11” highlights the full report. Our third DNA-related story is another example of how NIJ makes a difference. “Online DNA Training Targets Lawyers, Judges” showcases one of our most recent (and exciting) tools: online training to help criminal justice practitioners—judges, prosecutors, and criminal defense attorneys—use DNA evidence in the pursuit of truth in the courtroom. All three of these examples are made possible by funding under the President’s DNA Initiative, a 5-year effort to enhance the use of this important tool to solve crimes and protect the innocent. NIJ is privileged to administer the Initiative, Advancing Justice Through DNA Technology, on behalf of the Administration and the U.S. Department of Justice. But this issue of the Journal is not just about DNA. In it, you will also find articles about the public’s perception of police officers and the correlation between sexual and physical assaults on women in relationships. Both provide important information that practitioners and policymakers should know. Whether forensics, policing, or violence against women, these—and many other key criminal justice areas—are supported by NIJ’s research, development, and evaluation. I hope that the results of our work, highlighted in this and other issues of the Journal, will help you in your work to further the cause of justice in America.

Glenn R. Schmitt Acting Director, National Institute of Justice Building Knowledge to Meet the Challenge of Crime and Justice

National Institute of Justice

Glenn R. Schmitt Acting Director

The NIJ Journal is published by the National Institute of Justice to announce the Institute’s policy-relevant research results and initiatives. The Attorney General has determined that publication of this periodical is necessary in transacting the public business of the U.S. Department of Justice as required by law. Findings and conclusions of the research reported here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice.

Subscription information online nij.ncjrs.gov/subscribe/reg.asp phone 301–519–5500 800–851–3420 mail NCJRS P.O. Box 6000 Rockville, MD 20849–6000

World Wide Web address www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/journals

Contact NIJ National Institute of Justice 810 Seventh Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20531, U.S.A. www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/contact.htm

NIJ Journal Editorial Board Kirsten Baumgarten Rowe Chief of Staff John Morgan Assistant Director for Science and Technology Thomas E. Feucht Assistant Director for Research and Evaluation Stanley Erickson Cindy Smith Jolene Hernon Cornelia Sorensen Sigworth Rhonda Jones George Tillery Akiva Liberman Lois Tully Lee Mockensturm Brenda Worthington Marilyn Moses Edwin Zedlewski

Editor Nancy Ritter Production by: Palladian Partners, Inc. Stefani E. Avila, Production Editor Aaron Auyeung, Designer Maureen Berg, Designer 2 0 0 7 Contents January 2007 Features Missing Persons and Unidentified Remains: 2 The Nation’s Silent Mass Disaster by Nancy Ritter

Making Every Encounter Count: Building Trust 8 and Confidence in the Police by Jake Horowitz

Sexual Assault in Abusive Relationships 12 by Lauren R. Taylor with Nicole Gaskin-Laniyan

Online DNA Training Targets Lawyers, Judges 16 by Glenn R. Schmitt

Identifying Remains: Lessons Learned From 9/11 20 by Nancy Ritter

Also in This Issue Publications of Interest From NIJ 19 Missing Persons and Unidentified Remains: The Nation’s Silent Mass Disaster by Nancy Ritter

About the Author Nancy Ritter is a writer/editor at the National Institute of Justice and a tremendous challenge to State and local Editor of the NIJ Journal. law enforcement agencies. The workload for these agencies is staggering: More than f you ask most Americans about a mass 40,000 sets of human remains that cannot disaster, they’re likely to think of the be identified through conventional means I 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center, are held in the evidence rooms of medical Hurricane Katrina, or the Southeast Asian examiners throughout the country.1 But only tsunami. Very few people—including law 6,000 of these cases—15 percent—have enforcement officials—would think of the been entered into the FBI’s National Crime number of missing persons and unidentified Information Center (NCIC) database. human remains in our Nation as a crisis. It is, however, what experts call “a mass Efforts to solve missing persons cases disaster over time.” are further hindered because many cities and counties continue to bury unidentified The facts are sobering. On any given day, remains without attempting to collect DNA there are as many as 100,000 active missing samples. And many labs that are willing to persons cases in the United States. Every make the effort may not be equipped to year, tens of thousands of people vanish perform DNA analysis of human remains, under suspicious circumstances. Viewed especially when the samples are old or over a 20-year period, the number of missing degraded. persons can be estimated in the hundreds of thousands. Compounding this problem is the fact that many of the Nation’s 17,000 law enforcement Due in part to sheer volume, missing persons agencies don’t know about their State’s and unidentified human remains cases are missing persons clearinghouse or the four N I J J o u r n al / Issue No. 256

The Federal Databases and What They Do

■ CODIS(mp) (Combined DNA Index Division, this national fingerprint System for Missing Persons): Also and criminal history database known as the National Missing provides automated fingerprint Person DNA Database (NMPDD), search capabilities, latent search CODIS(mp) is a database specifi- capability, electronic image cally designed to assemble data storage, and electronic exchange on missing persons and unidenti- of fingerprints and responses. fied human remains cases. It was Agencies may submit fingerprints created in 2000 by the FBI using electronically and will receive quick existing portions of the CODIS turnaround on analyses. database. The searchable database ■ NCIC (National Crime Information includes information on nuclear and Center): An information system mitochondrial DNA obtained from maintained by the FBI and dedi- unidentified remains, relatives cated to serving and supporting of missing persons, and personal Federal, State, and local criminal reference samples. Having both justice agencies. types of DNA profiles maximizes the potential for a successful ■ ViCAP (Violent Criminal Apprehen- identification. sion Program): This nationwide data center is designed to collect, ■ IAFIS (Integrated Automated collate, and analyze information on Fingerprint Identification System): crimes of violence, such as homi- Maintained by the FBI’s Criminal cides, sexual assaults, kidnappings, Justice Information Services and missing persons cases.

Federal databases—NCIC, National Crime available to State and local law enforcement Information Center; CODIS(mp), Combined officials to identify human remains and help DNA Index System for Missing Persons; solve missing persons cases. IAFIS, Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System; and ViCAP, Violent NIJ’s plan is multifaceted. It includes Criminal Apprehension Program—which programs aimed at: can be invaluable tools in a missing person investigation. (See sidebar above, “The ■ Training medical examiners, law enforce- Federal Databases and What They Do.”) ment officers, and victims’ families on Even in jurisdictions that are familiar with forensic DNA evidence. the State and Federal databases, some ■ Providing free testing of unidentified officials say they have neither the time human remains and family reference nor the resources to enter missing persons samples. and unidentified human remains data into the systems. ■ Encouraging States—through proposed model legislation—to collect DNA samples Bridging the Gap before unidentified remains are disposed of and to analyze degraded and old To help State and local jurisdictions address biological samples. the country’s “mass disaster over time,” the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) has ■ Making DNA reference sample collection brought together some of the country’s top kits available, free of charge, to any criminal justice and forensic science experts. jurisdiction in the country. As part of the President’s multiyear initiative ■ Increasing law enforcement’s use of to maximize the use of forensic DNA in solv- Federal databases to solve missing persons ing crime, NIJ is making Federal resources and unidentified human remains cases.  N I J J o u r n al / Issue No. 256

“CSI” Meets the Real World sent a femur from the Deer Creek remains No longer to the lab. There, scientists ran DNA tests Many of the people who go missing in on the bone fragments and uploaded does solving a the United States are victims of homicide. the profile into the CODIS(mp) database. Although the conventional approach to locat- Meanwhile, in King County, Washington, missing persons or ing a missing person is to initiate a criminal authorities working on an unrelated murder investigation into the disappearance, in many case came across Marci’s missing per- unidentified human cases, the investigation begins at a different sons file. Detectives tracked down Marci’s point—when human remains are found. mother, obtained a DNA sample from her, remains case have and sent it to the CHI lab. When a database This is where the Center for Human search indicated a potential match with the to depend on Identification (CHI) steps in. Located at the remains of the victim in the Deer Creek University of North Texas Health Science case, officials sent DNA from Marci’s a break in the Center, CHI is one of NIJ’s largest and most brother and father to CHI for further tests. exciting DNA projects. At CHI’s laboratory in investigation Ft. Worth, State and local law enforcement On April 6, 2006—more than 21 years after agencies can have nuclear and mitochondrial her body was unearthed from a shallow because we now DNA (mtDNA) testing performed on skeletal grave—Marci Bachmann was “found.”4 remains and on missing persons’ family have the design and direct reference samples.2 Experts at CHI’s Laboratory for Forensic Anthropology, Solving Cold Cases and protocol of such as Harrell Gill-King, Ph.D., also perform anthropological examinations on unidentified When George Adams, program manager pure science. human remains to determine manner and for CHI, is asked about cold hits like cause of death. All of this testing is free. the Marci Bachmann case—where the DNA from unidentified remains matches NIJ’s funding of this revolutionary project the DNA from reference samples that means that every jurisdiction in the United have been sent to the lab without any States has access to one of the few labora- apparent connection—he paraphrases tories in the country that can search mtDNA Vernon Geberth from Practical Homicide and short tandem repeat (STR)3 profiles in Investigation: Tactics, Procedures, and the CODIS(mp) database. Forensic Techniques. “Solving a cold case like Marci’s is not a matter of chance or luck; It also means that Dereck Bachmann can it is, quite simply, a matter of design and finally stop looking for his sister. protocol.”

Finally, Closure The “design” Adams refers to is the CODIS(mp) database. The “protocol” Marci Bachmann was 16 when she ran works like this: A person goes missing; away from her Vancouver, Washington if he or she is not found within 30 days, home in May 1984. Although her remains a family reference sample is obtained. were found a few months later—discovered The sample can take either of two forms— in the woods near Deer Creek in Missoula, a DNA sample from a close relative Montana—no one knew that the remains (obtained by a simple, noninvasive cheek were hers. swab) or from a personal item belonging to the missing person (such as hair from For nearly two decades, Dereck, Marci’s a comb or saliva from a toothbrush). The brother, searched newspapers and missing sample is then sent to the lab, and the DNA persons files and even hired a private is analyzed. The results or “profiles” are investigator to find Marci. Finally, in 2004, then loaded into the database. a series of events brought him and his family the closure they were seeking. Simultaneously, human remains found throughout the country are being sent to It began when a cold case detective in CHI’s lab for analysis and uploading into Missoula heard about CHI. The detective the database. DNA profiles from missing

 N I J J o u r n al / Issue No. 256

persons or their families are compared with unidentified human remains in the One Face Behind NIJ’s Work CODIS(mp) database. “If we already have the family reference sample, we will get Melody Reilly’s brother, a match,” Adams stated. No longer does Shawn, was murdered solving a missing persons or unidentified in the summer of 2005. human remains case have to depend on His body was dumped a “break in the investigation,” he added, in a field in rural Bastrop “because we now have the design and County, Texas, and was protocol of pure science.” extremely decomposed when found. A year later, Populating the Database: the Center for Human Identification (CHI), at the Sample Collection Kits University of North Texas But the database will help solve cases only Health Science Center, identified Shawn’s body if profiles from DNA samples and recovered Shawn Reilly human remains are submitted for analysis from his DNA. Here is and uploaded into the system. “We’ve the letter that Melody wrote to George Adams, of CHI, after the seen a tremendous increase in the number men who killed her brother were convicted. of remains samples, but we really need to work on getting family reference samples,” Dear Mr. Adams, said Arthur Eisenberg, Ph.D., director of CHI I just want to tell you how much your office’s work means to me, and a member of NIJ’s Missing Persons my sisters, our husbands, children, and extended family. Also on National Task Force. “If families don’t send behalf of our parents, who are no longer here; but I am sure they reference or biological samples—which appreciate your efforts, as well. at this stage must be collected by a law enforcement official—human remains My sister Michelle and I were in court during the trial last week, cannot be identified.” and it was so comforting to see the people who worked so hard to identify my brother’s remains. To facilitate this process, NIJ has funded My brother, Shawn, was an amazing and special person who CHI’s development of two DNA sample ended up in the company of the wrong, and the worst, people. collection kits: one for family reference What our family has gone through is almost the worst you can samples and the other for collecting and imagine—wondering where Shawn was, hoping the remains transporting human remains. Both kits were not his. The only thing worse is the terrible thought of not are available free of charge to any police knowing where my brother is now. I wish he was here next to me, department, medical examiner, or coroner laughing and smiling, but unfortunately that is no longer possible. in the United States. As of July 2006, more What your office did to identify my brother and allow us to bring than 4,000 family reference sample kits had his remains home is something I can never repay or express been disseminated. enough gratitude for. It really scares me to think we could be in a completely different place right now. Getting the Word Out We feel badly because we put so much pressure—sometimes Spreading the word about this free resource daily—on Investigator Yarbrough to give us some answers from remains a challenge. Last June, the Wash- August through March, and he tried his best to keep us calm. ington State’s Office of the Attorney General I didn’t realize how much work and time it takes to identify issued a bulletin encouraging local jurisdic- someone, and I am now happy that your office took every tions to send family reference samples to day and every minute they needed to get it done properly. CHI, making Washington the first State to solicit samples on a statewide basis. Please pass my thoughts on to those involved and let them know Eisenberg said he has no doubt that as word their work is important and invaluable. I am attaching a photo of of the CHI analysis and database spreads, Shawn so maybe you and they can have a nicer image of him. it will come to be regarded not as a tool of last resort in missing persons and unidenti- Melody Reilly fied human remains cases, but rather as a primary investigative tool.

 N I J J o u r n al / Issue No. 256

As of July 2006, CHI had received more Searching the Databases than 680 unidentified human remains and more than 1,600 family reference samples. One of the biggest challenges in missing Importantly, the lab is in the final stages of persons and unidentified human remains being able to use robots, which will allow cases is searching and correlating case the number of DNA analyses to skyrocket: information. The Missing Persons National one robot, for example, will be able to Task Force is examining ways that Federal analyze 17,800 DNA samples per year. databases can share information to help solve these cases. Five States—California, Kansas, Nevada, New Mexico, and Texas—have laws that The challenge is significant. For example, focus on locating missing persons and NCIC contains more than 100,000 missing identifying human remains. In 2005, NIJ persons cases, but the Integrated Automated brought together, Federal, State, and Fingerprint Identification System contains local law enforcement officials, forensic only 47. NCIC contains just 15 percent of scientists, victims advocates, legislators, unidentified human remains cases, in part and families of missing persons to draft because it is so labor intensive to enter the model State legislation on the prompt data into the system. To encourage State collection, analysis, and dissemination and local law enforcement agencies’ use of evidence to help solve these cases. of NCIC, the FBI published an updated (See www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/ version of the Missing Persons and 210740v2.pdf.) Seven States (Alabama, Unidentified Persons data collection Arizona, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Ohio, guides, which walk users through the and Washington) and the District of process of comparing new and existing Columbia have introduced bills that use data on missing persons and unidentified the proposed legislation as guidance. human remains investigations. Electronic Also, legislators in Kansas and New Mexico versions of the guides are available to law are seeking to amend their existing laws. enforcement officials through the Law Enforcement Online (LEO) intranet.

Moving to Solve the Problem ViCAP is another valuable tool available In addition to prohibiting the cremation of to State and local officials. It is also unidentified remains, the model legislation underused for several reasons. Because would require that: data entered into NCIC do not automatically populate the ViCAP database (which is also ■ Law enforcement agencies accept every run by the FBI), many jurisdictions choose missing person report and share case not to use it. And until recently, most of the information with State and regional Nation’s medical examiners and coroners authorities. did not have access to ViCAP. This situation is changing, however, as the FBI negotiates ■ DNA samples be taken within 30 days memoranda of understanding with local of a missing person report and the jurisdictions that will give medical examiners individual’s profile be added to national, and coroners access to the database. The State, and local databases. FBI is also developing a DVD for law ■ Cases involving high-risk missing persons enforcement that explains how ViCAP be assessed immediately (high-risk cases works. And with help from the Criminal might include, for example, a possible Justice Information Services (CJIS) Division, stranger abduction or a person who ViCAP may soon be Web-enabled. Instead requires medical attention or is mentally of having to enter case information via a impaired). CD-ROM, which is then mailed to CJIS for uploading, users would need only an ■ DNA analysis be performed on all unidenti- Internet connection and an LEO account fied human remains. to enter case data directly into ViCAP.

 N I J J o u r n al / Issue No. 256

Law Enforcement Training ... and More NIJ has held two regional missing persons In addition to funding CHI’s work, NIJ administers a wide range of projects under training conferences, and by the end of 2006, the President’s DNA Initiative. One major effort involves the training of police officers; NIJ’s missing persons training reached prosecutors, defense counsel, and judges; forensic and medical specialists; victim professionals from all 50 States. service providers; and corrections, probation, and parole officers on the use of forensic DNA evidence. To date, NIJ has held of Forensic DNA for Officers of the Court, two regional missing persons training can be downloaded at www.dna.gov/ conferences, and by the end of 2006, training/otc. (See “Online DNA Training NIJ’s missing persons training reached Targets Lawyers, Judges” on p.16.) professionals from all 50 States. NIJ is ■ An electronic version of the FBI’s also developing many types of electronic Missing Persons and Unidentified Persons training tools—one recent release is data collection guide is available to law Principles of Forensic DNA for Officers enforcement officials through the LEO of the Court, an interactive, computer- Intranet at http://home.leo.gov/lesig/cjis/ based training program on the use of programs/ncic. DNA evidence in the courtroom. Notes Other NIJ programs seek to eliminate the backlog of biological samples in murder, 1. The Bureau of Justice Statistics is finalizing a rape, and kidnapping cases in forensic comprehensive census of the Nation’s medical laboratories across the country. Since 2004, examiners and coroners. This study—expected NIJ has provided funding to State and local to be published in early 2007—will examine agencies to reduce casework and convicted data from 2,000 medical examiners and coroners and focus on the issue of uniden- offender backlogs. NIJ also supports the tified human remains. development of tools and technology for 2. Nuclear DNA is the genetic material inherited faster, less costly methods of DNA analysis, from both parents: half from the mother and including ways to analyze smaller and more half from the father. It is found in the nucleus degraded biological samples. of each cell and is unique to each individual (except in cases of identical twins). Nuclear And NIJ will continue to fund programs that DNA is a powerful identifier and has been enhance the use of DNA to solve crimes, used for forensic purposes for decades. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA)—which is protect the innocent, and identify missing found in the mitochondria of a cell, outside persons. the nucleus—is inherited solely from the NCJ 216523 mother and is not unique. Everyone in the same maternal line, for generations, will have For More Information the same mtDNA. Its use as a forensic tool in narrowing the pool of possible donors of a ■ For DNA sample testing kits and free sample is a more recent development. testing of DNA samples, contact the 3. Short tandem repeats (STRs) are short Center for Human Identification at sequences of DNA nucleotides that are 1–800–763–3147, or visit www.hsc. repeated numerous times. An individual unt.edu/departments/pathology_ genetic profile can be created by counting anatomy/dna/forensic.htm. the number of repeats of the DNA sequence at a specific location on a chromosome. ■ Information on improving the use of foren- This repeat number varies greatly between sic DNA evidence throughout the Nation’s individuals. criminal justice system can be found at 4. According to authorities in Missoula, Marci www.dna.gov. Bachmann was murdered by Missoula serial ■ An online training program for prosecutors, killer Wayne Nance. defense attorneys, and judges, Principles

 Making Every Encounter Count: Building Trust and Confidence in the Police by Jake Horowitz

About the Author Jake Horowitz is a Senior Associate at The Pew Charitable Trusts. The woman’s unsolicited comments quelled the crowd, which quickly dispersed with- out incident. The officer later reflected on everal years ago in the Flatbush the encounter. “I never forgot that lesson,” neighborhood of Brooklyn, New he noted. “You never know when treating S York, police officers responded to people well will pay off—not just in satisfying a report of youths stealing from a street what you owe to citizens—but in this larger vendor. When the uniformed officers communal sense of gaining allies.” arrived on the scene, the youths reacted confrontationally: “Why are you harassing What Factors Affect Public me? I’m just on my way home from school. Satisfaction With the Police? How dare you! You’re just doing this ‘cause I’m black.”1 Satisfaction with the police, while generally high, is unevenly distributed. Understanding A large group of onlookers formed. One of why some people harbor negative views the officers said that he sensed the youths about police officers is the first and most were hoping to “get the crowd working important step in building a positive relation- against us … [so we would] … just back off.” ship with the community. While the officer was explaining to the crowd why they were there, a woman in the crowd NIJ recently funded five studies exploring spoke up. “I remember this guy,” she told factors that influence satisfaction with the the others. “I got my purse robbed 2 months police. The research suggests that satisfac- ago and he was really good; he treated me tion is shaped by demographic variables, well. I think he’s a good cop and I trust him.” neighborhood crime conditions, and N I J J o u r n al / Issue No. 256

experiences with the police—whether first hand or indirect. Race was not found Every encounter—both pleasant and to directly determine level of satisfaction. Instead, researchers concluded that race, unpleasant—with the public can greatly due to its correlation with other demo- graphic variables, neighborhood crime rates, affect the community’s level of satisfaction and experiences with police, was an indirect influence on the level of satisfaction with with the police. the police.

Although community members’ views The implication: Every encounter—both about the police may be stubbornly pleasant and unpleasant—with the public resistant to change, police officers and can greatly affect the community’s level policymakers should appreciate that treating of satisfaction with the police. individuals respectfully and professionally during each encounter can establish, build, It also appears that people bring different and maintain crucial support for the police expectations to their encounters with the within the community. police, depending upon whether those encounters are police- or citizen-initiated. The Importance of Quality Treatment In the past, it was widely assumed that When people form opinions of the police police-initiated encounters had the great- based on their interactions, they tend to est impact on citizen attitudes.5 But NIJ- focus on the process more than the out- funded research at the University of Illinois come. Impressions of police encounters at Chicago contradicts that belief. Instead, are influenced by the demeanor as well as researchers found that negative encounters the actions of the officer. People pay close have a greater tendency to erode satisfac- attention to the “neutrality of decision tion with the police when they are citizen- making, respectful and polite interpersonal initiated.6 This finding raises the possibility treatment, and … opportunities for input into that individuals’ unmet expectations of how decisions,” noted Tom Tyler of New York the police could or should have assisted University.2 Researchers often refer to this them during an encounter may be as as a person’s sense of “procedural justice.” influential in forming opinions as the experience itself, regardless of whether People base their impressions of the citizens or police initiate the contact. police on their own personal experiences and on secondhand reports of police Race and the Context of Neighborhoods encounters. However, because most Trust and confidence in the police, however, Americans do not directly interact with are built on more than police encounters. the police in any given year, they are Recent NIJ studies also explored the role forming their opinions on the basis of of race in the formation of opinions about word-of-mouth accounts from others. the police. Early studies of satisfaction with police Although the data show that Caucasians showed that a person’s unpleasant experi- hold the police in higher regard than African ences had a greater impact than pleasant 3 Americans or Hispanics, race was not found experiences. Newer studies, however, to directly influence how people form opin- have found that pleasant experiences ions about police. In fact, when researchers have a greater influence than researchers 4 controlled for factors such as the level of originally thought. As illustrated by the neighborhood crime, the reported quality of Flatbush officer’s experience described police-citizen encounters, and other demo- at the beginning of this article, positive graphic variables, such as age, income, and experiences with the police can have a education, the effects of race disappeared ripple effect throughout the community.

 N I J J o u r n al / Issue No. 256

The challenge for law enforcement officers The challenge for law enforcement is to treat each encounter—whether with a suspect, witness, or complainant—as if it officers is to treat each encounter— is that person’s first contact with police. If he or she believes that the officer was fair whether with a suspect, witness, or and professional, then that person is more likely to have positive impressions of future complainant—as if it is that person’s encounters with police. Making this effort with each and every interaction is an first contact with police. important investment in building goodwill within the community.

entirely or were substantially reduced. Steps to Enhancing a Researchers concluded that race affects Positive Public Image satisfaction with the police indirectly and in Public consent and support of law enforce- conjunction with other factors, including the ment are two of the most critical tools on a 7 level of crime within one’s neighborhood. police officer’s “belt.” People who believe that the police are performing their duties People in low-crime neighborhoods tend with professionalism and integrity are more to credit police officers with securing and likely to obey laws and support the system maintaining low crime rates. As a result, by acting as witnesses, for example.10 perceptions of the police in those neighbor- hoods are mostly positive. In neighborhoods NIJ’s continuing research into the determi- with higher crime rates—where racial and nants of satisfaction, trust, and confidence ethnic minorities are disproportionately in the police reveals that attitudes toward represented—the level of community the police are shaped by a combination satisfaction with police is substantially of demographic variables, neighborhood lower. These findings illustrate that, in conditions, direct and vicarious police addition to unpleasant police encounters, citizen encounters, and prior attitudes. individuals’ dissatisfaction with crime rates The police cannot control some of these in their community can negatively affect factors; others, however, are a direct 8 their view of police. consequence of an individual officer’s actions and demeanor. Therefore, officers The Impact of Attitudes should focus their efforts where they can on Perceptions of Police have the most direct impact: in each day-to-day interaction with the public. Some would argue that satisfaction with law enforcement is a dynamic concept, The first step in building good relations evolving with each citizen’s interaction with with the community is to understand and the police. But recent research challenges respond to the expectations of people that contention. Attitudes toward the police across a range of possible police encoun- appear to be relatively stable, and people’s ters. Departments might also consider preexisting views shape their perceptions tracking the level of satisfaction through of future encounters. Researchers at the community surveys. This feedback could be University of Illinois–Chicago found that used to design police training and interven- residents’ initial attitudes toward the police tion programs. In the end, NIJ’s research played a critical role in determining their illustrates that it behooves our Nation’s judgments of subsequent experiences and police officers to pay close attention to in the formation of future attitudes toward developing what might be called their police.9 “bedside manner.”11

NCJ 216524

10 N I J J o u r n al / Issue No. 256

For More Information 2. Tyler, T.R., “Policing in Black and White: This article is primarily based on several Ethnic Group Differences in Trust and Confidence in the Police,” Police Quarterly studies funded by NIJ. The principal 8 (3) (September 2005): 339, available at investigators published their findings in http://pqx.sagepub.com/content/vol8/issue3. Police Quarterly 8 (3) (September 2005), available at http://pqx.sagepub.com/ 3. Skogan, W.G., “Asymmetry in the Impact of Encounters With Police,” Policing & content/vol8/issue3. The articles are: Society 16 (2) (2006): 99. ■ Miller, J., R.C. Davis, N.J. Henderson, 4. Rosenbaum, D.P., A.M. Schuck, S.K. Costello, J. Markovic, and C. Ortiz, “Measuring D.F. Hawkins, and M.K. Ring, “Attitudes Influences on Public Opinion of the Police Toward the Police: The Effects of Direct and Using Time-Series Data: Results of a Pilot Vicarious Experience,” Police Quarterly 8 (3) Study.” (September 2005): 360, available at http://pqx. sagepub.com/content/vol8/issue3. ■ Rosenbaum, D.P., A.M. Schuck, S.K. Costello, D.F. Hawkins, and M.K. Ring, 5. Ibid., 359. “Attitudes Toward the Police: The Effects 6. Ibid. of Direct and Vicarious Experience.” 7. Weitzer, R., and S.A. Tuch, “Determinants of ■ Skogan, W.G., “Citizen Satisfaction With Public Satisfaction With the Police,” Police Police Encounters.” Quarterly 8 (3) (September 2005): 292; and Skogan, W.G.,“Citizen Satisfaction With ■ Tyler, T.R., “Policing in Black and White: Police Encounters,” Police Quarterly 8 (3) Ethnic Group Differences in Trust and (September 2005): 316. Both articles Confidence in the Police.” available at http://pqx.sagepub.com/content/ vol8/issue3. ■ Weitzer, R. and S.A. Tuch, “Determinants of Public Satisfaction With the Police.” 8. Weitzer and Tuch, “Determinants of Public Satisfaction,” 292. Notes 9. Rosenbaum et al., “Attitudes Toward the Police,” 343. 1. Conversation between the author and a 10. Tyler, “Policing in Black and White,” 333. New York City police officer assigned to the Flatbush neighborhood, April 2004. 11. Skogan, “Citizen Satisfaction,” 310.

11 Sexual Assault in Abusive Relationships by Lauren R. Taylor with Nicole Gaskin-Laniyan

About the Authors Lauren R. Taylor is a freelance writer. Nicole Gaskin-Laniyan, Ph.D., is with data collected from women who were a Social Science Analyst in the Violence and Victimization Research physically but not sexually assaulted by their partners. The researchers identified risk fac- Division of the National Institute of Justice. tors for women in abusive relationships that could be used to develop referral and safety recent study funded by NIJ on women programs for victims and their children. who had been physically assaulted A by an intimate partner found that Impact of Reporting on Revictimization two-thirds of the women had also been sexually assaulted by that partner.1 In addition Most research supports the claim that to a victim’s physical and psychological sexual assault is common in physically injuries, her older children were found to abusive relationships. McFarlane and Malecha be at increased risk for depression. found that 68 percent of the abused women reported having been sexually assaulted Researchers Judith McFarlane and Anne by their intimate partners. Sexual assault Malecha from Texas Woman’s University occurred repeatedly within these intimate collected data from 148 women who sought relationships—almost 80 percent of sexually assistance from the judicial system after assaulted women reported more than one being physically assaulted by an intimate incident of forced sex. partner.2 The women, who were inter- viewed first in 2001, were contacted again Most of the women in the study did not in 2003 with questions about forced sex.3 report the assault or seek assistance after Researchers looked at the incidence and the first rape—just 6 percent contacted the consequences of sexual assault in intimate police after the first rape, and 8 percent relationships and compared the findings applied for a protective order. But women N I J J o u r n al / Issue No. 256

who did contact law enforcement or seek assistance from the courts were less likely Older children (aged 12 to 18 years) of to be revictimized. Specifically, women who contacted the police following the sexually abused mothers showed more first rape were 59 percent less likely to be raped by an intimate partner again, whether depression and appreciably more behavioral or not the abuser was arrested. Women who applied for a protective order after the problems than did children of mothers first rape were 70 percent less likely to be raped again, whether or not the order was who had not been sexually assaulted. obtained. Most women waited several years after the first sexual assault before apply- murder. Researchers did not find significant ing for a protective order, with Caucasians differences in these risk factors across waiting the longest (on average 8 years), ethnicity or race of the women. followed by Latina women (5 years), and African American women (3 years). What Children Witness Physical and Emotional Tolls of The effect of sexual assault in an abusive Intimate Partner Sexual Abuse relationship permeates a household. Almost 90 percent of children of women in the Sexual assault by intimate partners has a study who were physically assaulted or profound effect on victims and their children. both physically and sexually assaulted were exposed to these incidents against their Researchers McFarlane and Malecha also mothers. By the age of 3, 64 percent of found that the sexually assaulted women the children had witnessed the abuse; 30 in the study had worse mental and physical percent of them received counseling. Older health than women who had been physically children (aged 12 to 18 years) of sexually but not sexually abused. The women had abused mothers showed more depression more post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and had appreciably more behavioral prob- symptoms, more pregnancies resulting lems than children of mothers who had not from rape, and more sexually transmitted been sexually assaulted. diseases.4 Foreign-born women in the study were found to have a high risk of developing Steps for Change PTSD and also to have fewer social supports. In addition, 27 percent of the When a woman is sexually assaulted by an women surveyed began or increased intimate partner, her health—mental and their use of alcohol, illicit drugs (usually physical—is compromised. Her children’s cocaine), or nicotine after they were risk for depression is also heightened. sexually assaulted by an intimate partner. Workers in the justice, health, and social Women who had been sexually assaulted service fields can take steps to help by an intimate partner were also more victims of intimate partner sexual assault. likely to threaten or attempt suicide than The researchers recommend that these women who were physically but not sexu- professionals: ally abused. Twenty-two percent of sexually assaulted women said they had threatened ■ Receive training on the frequency and or attempted suicide within 90 days of apply- health and safety consequences of ing for a protection order, compared with intimate partner sexual assault. 4 percent of women who were physically ■ Assess clients for type and frequency abused. of sexual assault.

Sexually abused women in the study were ■ Assess victims to determine if they also more likely to have had their abusers are at risk for PTSD, substance use, harass them at work and threaten them with and suicide.

13 N I J J o u r n al / Issue No. 256

■ Inform women who have been sexually Notes assaulted by their partner about their higher risk of being murdered by that 1. Sexual assault is defined as forced vaginal, partner. oral, or anal sex. 2. All sought protective orders from the courts. ■ Inform sexually abused immigrant Thirty-three percent were African American, women about their potential increased 26 percent were Caucasian, and 41 percent risk for PTSD. were Latina. Twenty-eight percent were also immigrants. There were no significant demo- ■ Instruct mothers about the potential graphic differences between the women who effects of partner abuse on their children. had been raped and those who had been physically abused but not raped. This information, delivered with the appropri- 3. Researchers initially interviewed 150 women ate referrals and safety planning information, in 2001. Because 2 of the women died in the could lead to greater protection for abused interim, only 148 were interviewed in 2003. women and their children. 4. Twenty percent of the women in the sample had rape-related pregnancies, and 15 percent NCJ 216525 contracted sexually transmitted diseases.

For More Information ■ McFarlane, J., and A. Malecha, Sexual Assault Among Intimates: Frequency, Consequences, and Treatments, final report submitted to the National Institute of Justice, 2005 (NCJ 211678), available at www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/ 211678.pdf.

14 N I J J o u r n al / Issue No. 256

The Conference 2 0 0 7 the Date Save July 23­–25, 2007 Marriott Crystal Gateway 1700 Jefferson Davis Highway Arlington, Virginia

To Register: www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij

15 Online DNA Training Targets Lawyers, Judges by Glenn R. Schmitt

About the Author Glenn R. Schmitt is the Acting Director of the National Institute of Justice. expectations that science can solve most crimes. The use of forensic DNA analysis This article first appeared in the May/June 2006 issue of The Prosecutor, is increasing as States continue to pass laws a bimonthly publication from the National District Attorneys Association that expand their DNA databases to require (www.ndaa.org). all felons and, in some States, even persons arrested for crimes, to provide a DNA sample. n today’s criminal justice system, one The Nation’s courts are being called upon to of the most powerful tools in the search adjudicate an even greater number of cases I for the truth is DNA evidence. But the that involve forensic DNA evidence, and the complexity of forensic DNA technologies, officers of those courts are being asked to techniques, and analysis presents new use this type of evidence far more often. challenges to prosecutors, defense lawyers, and judges. To assist lawyers and judges in the use of DNA analysis in the courtroom, the As new and more complex types of forensic National Institute of Justice—the research, techniques are developed, and as the public development and evaluation arm of the becomes aware of them, judges and lawyers U.S. Department of Justice—created an are frequently faced with the so-called “CSI online training program, Principles of Forensic Effect”—inflated expectations by jurors of DNA for Officers of the Court. NIJ’s interac- how forensic analysis can be used in crimi- tive, computer-based training program dis- nal investigations. This problem is probably cusses DNA evidence from the crime scene nowhere more pronounced than in the to the laboratory, from the courtroom to post- area of forensic DNA analysis. Continuing conviction testing, and was funded as part advances in this field increase jurors’ of the President’s DNA Initiative, Advancing N I J J o u r n al / Issue No. 256

Justice Through DNA Technology. The DNA Initiative provides operational funding, The President's DNA Initiative provides laboratory capacity-building, training, research and development, and technical operational funding, laboratory capacity- assistance to help ensure that forensic DNA technology reaches its full potential building, training, and technical assistance to solve crime, protect the innocent, and identify missing persons. to help ensure that forensic DNA technology

The 15-module Officers of the Court reaches its full potential to solve crime, program covers a wide-range of topics dealing with forensic DNA analysis, protect the innocent, and identify including: missing persons. ■ The biology of DNA and key issues of how DNA is used to solve crime.

■ The workings of a forensic laboratory and how to understand a DNA laboratory Another module in the training program report. discusses the framework within which states can conduct post-conviction DNA ■ Statistics and population genetics. testing. For example, hair found at a crime ■ DNA analysis, including mitochondrial scene that previously might have been and short tandem repeat (STR) analysis. identified only by microscopic analysis can now be tested using mitochondrial ■ The collection of DNA from evidence and suspects. DNA analysis. In addition, recent tech- nological advances now allow testing ■ Victim issues, such as privacy considera- of smaller, limited, degraded, or mixed tions and testing procedures. biological samples. This module also provides information on the existence, ■ Pretrial evidentiary issues. location, and condition of biologic evidence, ■ Trial presentation. and offers guidance on some of the legal and procedural issues involved in ■ The use of DNA in post-conviction cases. post-conviction DNA testing. ■ Emerging trends in DNA analysis. Looking to the future, module 15 examines Module 13, for example, discusses ways emerging trends in DNA analysis and to make DNA evidence more comprehen- how these may affect the use of biologic sible to jurors. It offers a video that shows evidence in the courtroom. For example, an expert witness presenting her back- an increasing number of laboratories ground and qualifications to a jury. There are automating DNA testing procedures is guidance for formulating questions to reduce cost, increase efficiency, and to a forensic DNA expert, including decrease the likelihood of human error. sample opening questions. There is also a discussion on the use of analogies to Why Online Training? help jurors intelligently and fairly evaluate DNA evidence. And the module addresses Online tutorials—sometimes called pretrial preparation between attorney and “e-learning”—can decrease training costs expert to ensure that jurors receive the for judges and public- and private-sector appropriate level of technical detail, including criminal lawyers. And, as legal profession- testimony on issues such as the significance als gain a greater understanding of DNA of testing results and areas of potential analysis—the most rapidly evolving scientific cross-examination. method of identification—plea bargains may

17 N I J J o u r n al / Issue No. 256

law, forensic science, and e-learning experts Because the forensic sciences are helped develop this training. Although it is designed primarily for prosecutors, defense ever evolving—and particularly because lawyers, and judges, it is also an outstanding resource for victim advocates, investigators, the general public often misunderstands law students, and other criminal justice the application and utility of DNA professionals interested in this area. Because the forensic sciences are evidence—judges and lawyers must ever evolving—and particularly because the general public often misunderstands increase their understanding of the application and utility of DNA evidence— judges and lawyers must increase their DNA technology and how it is used understanding of DNA technology and how it is used to prove guilt or innocence. NIJ is to prove guilt or innocence. committed to developing tools to help them meet that responsibility.

increase, leading to administrative cost NCJ 216526 savings. In fact, efficiencies may be realized beyond the courts, as more coordination For More Information occurs among requests for DNA testing, ■ Principles of Forensic DNA for Officers pretrial preparation, and expert testimony of the Court, NCJ 212399, is available requirements. online at www.dna.gov/training/otc. A CD-ROM version can be ordered through This training program uses a multimedia the National Criminal Justice Reference approach: text, images, animations, audio, Service (NCJRS) at www.ncjrs.gov. and video. Some of the Nation’s top criminal

18 N I J J o u r n al / Issue No. 256

Publications of Interest From NIJ

Communications Interoperability: city adopted a problem-solving approach Basics for Practitioners within the national program “Project PACT.” March 2006 Atlanta PACT formed strategic partnerships with Federal, State, and local law enforce- This NIJ “In Short” fact sheet summarizes ment and community-based groups to break the obstacles public safety agencies face the chain of illegal events leading to juvenile with communications interoperability. The gun violence. Some of the partnerships and two most common issues are frequency strategies established endure today within and equipment incompatibilities. It also Project Safe Neighborhoods. The report discusses CommTech’s solutions to over- describes the program’s methods and come these problems and available products lessons for other that can facilitate limited interoperability. communities. This This publication is available at www.ncjrs. publication is avail- gov/pdffiles1/nij/212978.pdf. able at www.ncjrs. gov/pdffiles1/ Drug Courts: The Second Decade nij/209800.pdf. June 2006 Introduced in the late 1980’s, drug courts help reduce substance abuse and criminal behavior and free the court and correctional systems to handle other cases. They offer a structure that links supervision and treat- ment as an alternative to incarceration. As of December 2005, more than 1,500 drug courts operate in the United States and another 391 are planned. This NIJ Special Report presents findings from several recent studies that focus on the successful components of drug courts, such as how participant attributes affect program out- comes, the judge’s role and relationship with participants, treatment issues, interventions for juveniles, and cost-benefit analyses. This publication is available at www.ncjrs.gov/ pdffiles1/nij/211081.pdf.

Reducing Gun Violence: Community Problem Solving in Atlanta by Arthur L. Kellermann, Dawna Fuqua-Whitley, and Constance S. Parramore June 2006 The fifth report in NIJ’s Reducing Gun Violence series examines the lessons learned from Atlanta’s ambitious program to reduce juvenile gun violence. In the late 1990’s, the

19 Identifying Remains: Lessons Learned From 9/11 by Nancy Ritter

About the Author Nancy Ritter is a writer/editor at the National Institute of Justice and Five years and thousands of man-hours Editor of the NIJ Journal. later, NIJ has published the KADAP’s report on its recommendations, Lessons Learned From 9/11: DNA Identification in Mass othing in the history of mass fatality 1 events prepared America’s forensic Fatality Incidents. Although the report is N community for the task of identifying written primarily for laboratory directors, it those who died when terrorists attacked contains information useful to any official the World Trade Center in New York City involved in preparing a comprehensive plan on September 11, 2001. The number of to identify victims of a mass fatality incident victims, the condition of their remains, using forensic DNA analysis. The report and the duration of the recovery effort includes an indepth look at: made their identification the greatest forensic challenge ever undertaken in ■ Assessing the magnitude of a DNA identifi- this country. cation effort and acquiring the resources to respond.

To assist in this monumental effort, NIJ ■ Collecting personal-item reference samples brought together a group of experts to and biological samples from the victims’ advise and support New York City’s Office families. of the Chief Medical Examiner during the identification effort. The Kinship and Data ■ Establishing laboratory policies and Analysis Panel (KADAP), made recommenda- procedures for DNA extraction, typing, tions on forensic technologies, policies, and and interpretation, and determining procedures to help identify victims who the statistical thresholds to be met for perished in the World Trade Center. (See identification of commingled, degraded, sidebar on p. 21, “What is the KADAP?”) or fragmented remains. N I J J o u r n al / Issue No. 256

■ Managing the laboratory’s work, including sample tracking and chain- The number of victims of the September 11, 2001, of-custody requirements, data management, technology, and World Trade Center attack, the condition of their quality assurance. remains, and the duration of the recovery effort ■ Educating and informing victims’ families, officials, the media, and the public. made their identification the greatest forensic How DNA Is Used to challenge ever undertaken in this country. Make Identifications DNA analysis is the gold standard for available. If sufficient DNA can be recovered, identifying human remains and may forensic DNA typing can identify biological be the only available method, when samples—even when the human remains other methods, such as birthmarks, are fragmented and the DNA is degraded, dental records, or fingerprints are not as with the World Trade Center victims.

What Is THe KADAP?

The idea of creating the Kinship and panel was comprised of scientists from Data Analysis Panel (KADAP) to advise the following agencies and universities: officials in the New York City medical the National Institutes of Health Human examiner’s office after the 9/11 attacks Genome Research Institute, the FBI, originated with W. Mark Dale, director the National Center for Biotechnology of Forensic Services for the New York Informatics, the National Institute of State Police. When Dale realized that Standards and Technology, the Armed the number of World Trade Center vic- Forces Institute of Pathology, the New tims and the condition of their remains York State Police Department, the New would require an unprecedented DNA- York City Office of the Chief Medical based identification effort, he asked Examiner, the University of Central the National Institute of Justice to Florida, Carleton University, Harvard create a “brain trust” of independent University, Yale University, Indiana scientists to offer guidance in this University, the University of North monumental task. Texas, the University of California, Johns Hopkins University, and a “I knew we were facing enormous number of private DNA laboratories. management challenges,” Dale said. “The notion that we were to reassoci- Members of the private and public ate potentially hundreds of thousands sectors also provided testimony of remains—let alone identify them by to the panel that guided its recom- comparing their profiles to perhaps mendations. Early demonstrations of tens of thousands of kin and effects DNA matching software, developed for profiles—was beyond daunting. We other mass fatality situations, were an needed human geneticists, statisticians, important contribution. Input from bioethicists, forensic DNA scientists/ the International Commission on managers, genetic researchers, Missing Persons in Bosnia, and the information technologists, database Royal Canadian Mounted Police, managers, and program managers— which shared a special computer and we needed them fast.” program that was used in the World Trade Center identification effort, The breadth of the combined experience was also invaluable. of the KADAP members is stunning. The

21 N I J J o u r n al / Issue No. 256

such as: Who will the laboratory report to? Everyone—the public, policymakers, and Who is responsible for funding? How will the samples be collected and tracked? How laboratory personnel—must understand many family reference collection kits are immediately available? Have procedures the answer to the important question: been established to handle incomplete data? Is staffing adequate for collection, “When are we finished?” accessioning, extraction, amplification, analysis, interpretation, reporting, quality control, family relations, and media Identifications are made by comparing the relations? Can the laboratory handle DNA profile of reference samples with those the accumulation of a normal casework from the human remains. The reference backlog while it works on the mass samples can be obtained from: (1) personal disaster identification effort? If so, items used by the victim (a toothbrush, how big can the backlog get? hairbrush, or razor); (2) banked biological samples (sperm or biopsy tissue from By addressing many of these major the victim); (3) biological relatives of the questions, the KADAP report can help victim; and (4) human remains previously the Nation’s laboratories prepare a DNA identified by other methods or other identification plan. Among the issues already-DNA-typed fragmented remains. to consider:

Often, however, the remains or the How important is DNA to the identifi- reference samples have severe limitations. cation effort? The degree to which human For example, environmentally harsh remains are fragmented or degraded conditions, such as those that occurred determines the importance of DNA following the World Trade Center attacks, analysis in a mass fatality identification can limit the quantity and quality of recover- effort. Intact body parts are often identifiable able DNA from the remains. There may also by less costly methods, such as X-ray, dental be insufficient personal items to serve as examination, or fingerprints. However, reference samples. For example, airline DNA analysis is the only viable method for passengers often travel with their tooth- identifying severely fragmented or degraded brushes and hairbrushes, and these items remains. Even when whole bodies are can be lost or destroyed in a crash. Because recovered, DNA analysis is still the best families often travel together, there may approach when dental records or verified also be a limited availability of kinship body identification by friends or relatives is samples. Kinship samples may also be not an option. scarce because the victim has few living biological relatives or the relatives are Will every person or every fragment be unable or choose not to participate in identified? The answer to this question the identification effort. The KADAP frames the scope of the entire identification report discusses these contingencies effort. For example, after the 9/11 attacks, and offers guidance to laboratories on Rudy Giuliani, the mayor of New York City, how to deal with them. directed the medical examiner to identify every fragment of human remains. If the Major Decisions Made Fast goal is to identify all human remains— as opposed to every victim—the identifi- Many critical management decisions are cation effort will take longer and be more made within the first 48 hours of a mass costly. On the other hand, if the policy disaster. To facilitate a plan of action for is to identify all the victims, the DNA identifi- laboratory directors, the KADAP report cation effort would stop when the last victim contains a checklist of important questions, is identified. This could mean that some

22 N I J J o u r n al / Issue No. 256

Sample Tracking and Management

Information technology can be one of and retrieve data; integrate different the most overlooked aspects of a DNA- software systems; allow technical and based identification effort following a administrative review of data; annotate mass disaster. Advance planning for problems and resolutions, report met- using information technology in sample rics; and track samples among partner tracking and management saves time, laboratories. speeds identification, and improves test- Finally, the report explores the difficulties ing reliability. that can arise when working with refer- Without sophisticated software, the ence samples, such as toothbrushes, nearly 1,600 identifications made and razors, and medical biopsy specimens. A nearly 20,000 human remains profiled laboratory must keep in mind that bereft in the World Trade Center identification loved ones can inadvertently misidentify effort would not have been possible. A reference samples and misspell names laboratory responding to a mass fatal- or nicknames. Family members may ity event must be prepared to track the also be mistaken in their belief that a physical location of each sample and missing relative was the only person to the data associated with it through the use a toothbrush: mixed DNA profiles entire identification process. The KADAP will eliminate an item as a single-source report considers sample accessioning, reference. Other complications include naming and numbering schemes, and assumed, but incorrect, parentage. advises how to handle the possibility The KADAP report discusses chain-of- that remains are commingled. The report custody documentation and how essen- also discusses matching and statistics tial the managing and tracking of sample software, and ways to organize, store, collection is to the identification process.

human remains would not be analyzed or Laboratory officials must also establish returned to the families. Everyone— policies on the number of testing attempts the public, policymakers, and laboratory that will be made to identify the remains personnel—must understand the answer and the statistical threshold that must be to the important question: “When are met to report an identification. These we finished?” decisions are fundamental to a laboratory’s strategic planning. What is the minimum fragment size that will be identified? The minimum How long will the recovery effort fragment size to be analyzed must also last? The size and location of a mass be established at the beginning of the fatality disaster also determines how effort. From the laboratory’s perspective, long the DNA identification effort will the minimum fragment size (typically 1 to take. Remains from an airline crash on 10 centimeters) should be based on three land, for example, are generally collected criteria: (1) maximizing the probability that in about 2 weeks. In contrast, remains all victims are identified, (2) recognizing from the World Trade Center were the emotional needs of the victims’ families collected over 10 months. and friends, and (3) providing forensically relevant information.

23 N I J J o u r n al / Issue No. 256

Waiting until all remains and reference These financial considerations, in turn, samples have been collected is the most influence decisions about minimum effective and efficient approach from the fragment size and retesting policies. laboratory’s perspective. However, when Laboratory managers must make sure the number of victims or fragmented the medical examiner understands the remains is large, collecting all of samples fiscal impact on the laboratory’s ability before the identification process begins is to make identifications. usually not possible. Delaying the identifica- tion process may not be acceptable to the Project Management victims’ families, the public, and officials, who expect the identification effort to begin Many laboratory directors are seasoned immediately and proceed rapidly. practitioners but lack management experi- ence. Skills in technical troubleshooting, What DNA technologies will be used? case management, molecular biology, The laboratory must make a preliminary and population statistics are important decision about what DNA technologies in the day-to-day running of a forensic will be used. For example, can all identifi- laboratory. Managing a mass fatality cations be made with standard forensic identification effort, however, requires short tandem repeat markers2? If the skills in communications, risk management, samples are severely compromised, are and integrating non-DNA disciplines. additional analyses, such as single nucleo- tide polymorphisms3 or mitochondrial DNA, The KADAP report examines a laboratory’s necessary? Longer recovery efforts usually project management in a mass fatality result in more DNA degradation, which, in situation from many perspectives, including turn, affects technology choices. sample accessioning, analysis and track- ing, quality control, information technology, Can the laboratory do the work? human resources, media relations, family Ultimately, the question of whether a coordination, and procuring equipment, laboratory has the capability and capacity supplies, and services. to perform the identifications must be answered. To help laboratory managers The report also offers guidance on the assess this, the KADAP report contains importance of establishing a procedure an “Estimated DNA Analysis Workload for handling requests for special analyses. Worksheet” that can be used to estimate In the World Trade Center effort, for the labor and materials required. The report example, the fire and police departments also includes an extensive discussion on frequently asked the laboratory to reprioritize contracting with outside laboratories. the testing of victim remains. Requests for expedited analyses could also occur later What is the funding source? State or local in an identification effort if, for example, forensic laboratories are not likely to have new remains were recovered or more sufficient funding for a large DNA identifi- useful personal items or biological cation effort. The KADAP report discusses reference samples became available. how the selection of resources can impact the identification effort. For example, the A laboratory manager may also encounter Federal Emergency Management Agency tremendous staffing challenges. The World (FEMA) is the primary source of Federal Trade Center effort demonstrates that funding in a mass disaster. Although FEMA consultants and outside vendors can be is generally prepared to support new equip- hired to offer special expertise and to ment purchases, if the DNA identification increase a laboratory’s capacity to handle effort is to be funded solely through State a large DNA analysis effort. The KADAP or local budgets, there could be limitations report discusses a variety of staffing issues on what purchases will be authorized. (e.g., working with volunteers, confidentiality

24 N I J J o u r n al / Issue No. 256

concerns, and mental health and morale) that could arise in a mass disaster identifi- “Striking the balance [between speed and cation response. accuracy] was one of the greatest challenges Managing Expectations in the World Trade Center effort,” said Faced with managing a DNA-based identifi- cation effort after a mass fatality disaster, KADAP member Thomas Parsons of the a laboratory is likely to encounter a host of new stakeholders. Although all of them Armed Forces Institute of Pathology. seek the same outcomes—the maximum number of identifications and the most “Pressure to establish working guidelines remains possible returned to families— their priorities may not be the same as for the rapid reporting of results, while those of the laboratory. Public officials might be focused on the speed of the process, maintaining a high threshold to reduce whereas the laboratory’s primary concern is the quality of the collection and analyses. the probability of misidentifications, Although these goals are not mutually exclusive, they can occasionally clash. was a constant concern—one that should

“Striking the balance [between speed be paramount throughout any and accuracy] was one of the greatest challenges in the World Trade Center identification effort.” effort,” said KADAP member Thomas Parsons of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology. “Pressure to establish working guidelines for the rapid reporting ■ What is the mood in the laboratory? of results, while maintaining a high How is your staff holding up under the threshold to reduce the probability of pressure? misidentifications, was a constant concern— one that should be paramount throughout The Family-Laboratory Relationship any identification effort.” Working with the families of victims of a mass fatality incident is likely to be foreign Laboratory directors should assume that to most laboratory directors. The KADAP the public—including public officials and report discusses how the formation of family the media—knows little about the realities assistance centers and family hotlines can of DNA analysis. To minimize the potential help in this regard. for misunderstandings and even greater emotional upheaval, the report advises that The report also facilitates one of the most a laboratory director be prepared to answer important aspects of a DNA-based identifi- questions such as: cation effort—the collection of reference samples from the victims’ families. ■ How many victims have been identified? Currently, no standards govern the ■ Have you identified the terrorists? collection of personal items and kinship reference samples. To assist in this effort, ■ How much time until the work is finished? the KADAP report includes three sample Why is it taking so long? documents designed by the panel: a ■ Will you be able to identify everyone, and, “Personal Items Submission Form,” a if not, why not? “Family and/or Donor Reference Collection Form,” and a “Family Tree Form.” ■ What is the condition of the remains?

25 N I J J o u r n al / Issue No. 256

Grieving family members often may not Notes know why they are being asked to provide a personal item that belonged to their loved 1. The report can be downloaded at www. one, or why the laboratory is requesting a massfatality.dna.gov. To order a hard copy DNA sample. They may not understand, for or CD of the report, call 1-800-851-3420 or example, the difference between a biological visit www.massfatality.dna.gov. The KADAP report is designed to augment another NIJ relative and someone who is called “aunt,” publication, Mass Fatality Incidents: A Guide but is not actually related. To help explain for Human Forensic Identification (www.ojp. the DNA identification process to the usdoj.gov/nij/pubs-sum/199758.htm), which general public, the KADAP report contains is also contained on the CD. an NIJ brochure that was distributed to 4 2. Short tandem repeats—repeating sequences victims’ families after the 9/11 attacks. of DNA nucleotides (that is, A, T, C, or G)—are called markers in DNA testing. Preparing a Plan 3. A single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) For the Nation’s forensic laboratories, occurs when a single nucleotide—that is, A, T, the primary lesson of 9/11 is clear: every C, or G—in a DNA sequence differs between individuals or between paired chromosomes jurisdiction—large and small, urban and in an individual. Because SNPs are inherited rural—must have a plan for identifying and do not change much from generation to mass disaster victims. Even before this generation, they can be used to determine report was published, NIJ was able to use the level of a genetic relationship between the work of the KADAP to assist officials individuals. involved in identifying the victims of the 4. Identifying Victims Using DNA: A Guide 2004 Southeast Asia tsunami and Hurricane for Families, is available at www.ncjrs.gov/ Katrina, a disaster that revealed how any pdffiles1/nij/209493.pdf and is contained State or municipality can be overwhelmed (in English or Spanish) on the CD mentioned by the operational requirements of respond- in note 1 above. ing to a mass fatality event.

When NIJ released the report, Glenn Schmitt, NIJ’s acting director, encouraged every jurisdiction to carefully consider the guidance in the KADAP report. “The families of the victims of the next mass fatality disaster, indeed, the entire Nation, will need their public officials to be prepared,” he said. “This guide will help us accomplish that mission.”

NCJ 216527

26 The National Institute of Justice is the research, development, and evaluation agency of the U.S. Department of Justice. NIJ’s mission is to advance scientific research, development, and evaluation to enhance the administration of justice and public safety.

The National Institute of Justice is a component of the Office of Justice Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice Assistance, the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, and the Office for Victims of Crime.

Photo Sources: PunchStock, GettyImages, and Creatas ISSUE No.

U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs PREsorted standard National Institute of Justice postage & feeS paid Washington, DC 20531 DOJ/NIJ Official Business Permit No. G-91 Penalty for Private Use $300

256