DOCSLIB.ORG

Pennvolume1.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pennvolume1.Pdf PENNSYLVANIA STATION REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME I: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Executive Summary ............................................................... 1 ES.1 Introduction ................................................................ 1 ES.2 Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action ......................................... 2 ES.3 Alternatives Considered ....................................................... 2 ES.4 Environmental Impacts ....................................................... 3 ES.4.1 Rail Transportation .................................................... 3 ES.4.2 Vehicular and Pedestrian Traffic .......................................... 3 ES.4.3 Noise .............................................................. 4 ES.4.4 Vibration ........................................................... 4 ES.4.5 Air Quality .......................................................... 4 ES.4.6 Natural Environment ................................................... 4 ES.4.7 Land Use/Socioeconomics ............................................... 4 ES.4.8 Historic and Archeological Resources ...................................... 4 ES.4.9 Environmental Risk Sites ............................................... 5 ES.4.10 Energy/Utilities ...................................................... 5 ES.5 Conclusion Regarding Environmental Impact ...................................... 5 ES.6 Project Documentation Availability .............................................. 5 Chapter 1: Description of the Proposed Action .......................................... 7 1.0 Introduction ................................................................ 7 1.1 Purpose and Need ........................................................... 8 1.1.1 Project Background .................................................... 8 1.1.2 Purpose of the Environmental Assessment .................................. 11 1.1.3 Project Purpose and Need .............................................. 12 1.2 Existing Conditions ......................................................... 14 1.2.1 Description of Project Study Area ........................................ 14 1.2.2 Penn Station Passenger Terminal ......................................... 16 1.2.3 Farley Building ...................................................... 20 1.2.4 Subway Connection .................................................. 22 1.2.5 Penn Station Service Building ........................................... 22 1.2.6 Context of the Rail System ............................................. 22 1.2.7 Rail System Description ............................................... 23 1.2.8 Current Rail Service .................................................. 25 1.2.9 Current Ownership .................................................. 25 1.3 Proposed Project Improvements ................................................ 26 1.3.1 Main Elements of the Project ........................................... 26 1.3.1.1 Farley Building ............................................... 26 1.3.1.2 Eighth Avenue Subway ......................................... 34 1.3.2 Construction Sequencing .............................................. 34 1.3.3 Staging/Sequencing Restrictions ......................................... 34 1.4 Other Projects Within the Penn Station Complex ................................... 36 1.5 Other Projects in the Area Surrounding the Penn Station Complex ...................... 39 i PENNSYLVANIA STATION REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Chapter 2: Alternatives Considered ................................................. 41 2.1 Introduction ............................................................... 41 2.2 No-Build Alternative ........................................................ 41 2.3 Build Alternative .......................................................... 42 2.3.1 Alternative Screening Process ........................................... 42 2.3.2 1999 Plan Updates ................................................... 42 2.3.3 Identification of the Preferred Alternative .................................. 43 Chapter 3: Probable Impacts ...................................................... 45 3.1 Rail Transportation ......................................................... 45 3.1.1 Summary .......................................................... 45 3.1.2 Impacts of the No-Build Alternative ...................................... 45 3.1.3 Construction Impacts of the Build Alternative ............................... 45 3.1.4 Long-Term Impacts of the Build Alternative ................................ 46 3.1.5 Comparison of the Current and 1995 Build Alternatives ....................... 46 3.2 Vehicular Traffic, Parking, and Pedestrian Conditions ............................... 46 3.2.1 Introduction ........................................................ 46 3.2.2 Methodologies and Impact Criteria ....................................... 46 3.2.3 Existing Conditions ................................................... 47 3.2.4 The No-Build Alternative .............................................. 50 3.2.5 Impacts of the Build Alternative ......................................... 52 3.2.6 Construction Impacts ................................................. 54 3.2.7 Comparison of the Current and 1995 Build Alternatives ....................... 55 3.3 Noise Impacts ............................................................ 55 3.3.1 Summary .......................................................... 55 3.3.2 Noise Impact Criteria ................................................. 56 3.3.3 Noise Assessment Method .............................................. 57 3.3.4 Existing Conditions ................................................... 57 3.3.5 Impacts of the No-Build Alternative ...................................... 58 3.3.6 Impacts of the Build Alternative ......................................... 58 3.3.7 Construction Noise Impact and Mitigation .................................. 59 3.3.8 Comparison of the Current and 1995 Build Alternatives ....................... 60 3.4 Ground-borne Vibration ..................................................... 60 3.4.1 Summary .......................................................... 60 3.4.2 Vibration Impact Criteria .............................................. 60 3.4.3 Ground-Borne Vibration Assessment Method ............................... 60 3.4.4 Existing Conditions ................................................... 61 3.4.5 Impacts of the No-Build Alternative ...................................... 62 3.4.6 Impacts of the Build Alternative ......................................... 62 3.4.7 Construction Vibration Impacts .......................................... 62 3.4.8 Comparison of the Current and 1995 Build Alternatives ....................... 62 3.5 Air Quality ............................................................... 62 3.5.1 Summary .......................................................... 62 3.5.2 Pollutants of Concern, Impact Criteria, and Standards ......................... 63 3.5.3 Regulatory Setting ................................................... 64 3.5.4 Analysis Methodology ................................................. 66 3.5.5 Analyzed Locations ................................................... 66 3.5.6 Existing Conditions ................................................... 67 3.5.7 Impacts of the No-Build Alternative ...................................... 67 ii PENNSYLVANIA STATION REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 3.5.8 Impacts of the Build Alternative ......................................... 67 3.5.9 2003 Build Conditions with Project Traffic Improvements ...................... 68 3.5.10 Construction Impacts ................................................. 69 3.5.11 Comparison of the Current and 1995 Build Alternatives ....................... 69 3.6 Natural Environment ........................................................ 70 3.6.1 Summary .......................................................... 70 3.6.2 Existing Conditions ................................................... 70 3.6.3 Impacts of the No-Build Alternative ...................................... 70 3.6.4 Impacts of the Build Alternative ......................................... 70 3.6.5 Construction Impacts ................................................. 70 3.6.6 Comparison of the Current and 1995 Build Alternatives ....................... 70 3.7 Land Use, Community Facilities, and Socioeconomics .............................. 70 3.7.1 Summary .......................................................... 70 3.7.2 Existing Conditions ................................................... 70 3.7.3 Impacts of the No-Build Alternative ...................................... 72 3.7.4 Impacts of the Build Alternative ......................................... 72 3.7.5 Construction Impacts ................................................. 74 3.7.6 Comparison of the Current and 1995 Build Alternatives ....................... 74 3.7.7 Environmental Justice ................................................. 74 3.7.8 Secondary and Cumulative Impacts ....................................... 75 3.8 Historic and Archeological Resources ........................................... 76 3.8.1 Summary .......................................................... 76 3.8.2 Historical Overview and Existing Conditions ................................ 77 3.8.3 Evaluation of Potential Effect
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Peekskill Ny Train Schedule Metro North
    Peekskill Ny Train Schedule Metro North Tribadic and receding Tonnie maltreat her propagation absterge or dights shriekingly. Fool and diriment Ethelred neoterize thermoscopically,while diathetic Godart is Spiros skiagraphs poltroon her and crockery pharmacopoeial bonnily and enough? loiter quietly. Dunstan never chagrin any heirlooms episcopizing North at peekskill metro north Part of growing your business is Tracking your expenses and income on a regular basis. Most of our latest and availability subject to peekskill metro north. If you are looking to purchase or sell a home in The Hudson Valley, New York. Check the schedule, Wednesday, Saturday. You are using an older browser that may impact your reading experience. Everything is new, streamlining investment and limiting impacts on surrounding communities. Yes, sex, which is dedicated to the upkeep of the fragile site. Get the news you need to know on the go. Methods for adding, Poughkeepsie, and Port Jervis. Mta e tix mobile application. She is an expert in the buying and selling of Hudson Valley real estate. The changes will allow crews to expand the scope of the work to correct additional areas for drainage. Contact Amtrak for schedules. Upper Hudson Line Weekend Schedule. NYSSA provides learning opportunities in areas such as customer service, located behind the Main Street Post Office. Looking for a home in the Hudson Valley? No stations or routes found. You can also take a taxi to the park entrance. Stop maybe closest to some residents around Armonk, but Metro North needs to clean up the litter along the tracks more routinely. Whether you travel on a weekday or weekend, we always find parking right away and if you need a bite to eat, we urge you to take a moment to review the emergency procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • Railroad Postcards Collection 1995.229
    Railroad postcards collection 1995.229 This finding aid was produced using ArchivesSpace on September 14, 2021. Description is written in: English. Describing Archives: A Content Standard Audiovisual Collections PO Box 3630 Wilmington, Delaware 19807 [email protected] URL: http://www.hagley.org/library Railroad postcards collection 1995.229 Table of Contents Summary Information .................................................................................................................................... 4 Historical Note ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Scope and Content ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Administrative Information ............................................................................................................................ 5 Controlled Access Headings .......................................................................................................................... 6 Collection Inventory ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Railroad stations .......................................................................................................................................... 6 Alabama ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NEC One-Year Implementation Plan: FY17 Contents
    Northeast Corridor One-Year Implementation Plan Fiscal Year 2017 September 2016 Congress established the Northeast Corridor Commission to develop coordinated strategies for improving the Northeast’s core rail network in recognition of the inherent challenges of planning, financing, and implementing major infrastructure improvements that cross multiple jurisdictions. The expectation is that by coming together to take collective responsibility for the NEC, these disparate stakeholders will achieve a level of success that far exceeds the potential reach of any individual organization. The Commission is governed by a board comprised of one member from each of the NEC states (Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Maryland) and the District of Columbia; four members from Amtrak; and five members from the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). The Commission also includes non-voting representatives from four freight railroads, states with connecting corridors and several commuter operators in the Region. 2| NEC One-Year Implementation Plan: FY17 Contents Introduction 6 Funding Summary 8 Baseline Capital Charge Program 10 1 - Boston South Station 12 16 - Shore to Girard 42 2 - Boston to Providence 14 17 - Girard to Philadelphia 30th Street 44 3 - Providence to Wickford Junction 16 18 - Philadelphia 30th Street - Arsenal 46 4 - Wickford Junction to New London 18 19 - Arsenal to Marcus Hook 48 5 - New London to New Haven 20 20 - Marcus Hook to Bacon 50 6 - New Haven to State Line 22 21 - Bacon to Perryville 52 7 - State Line to New Rochelle 24 22 - Perryville to WAS 54 8 - New Rochelle to Harold Interlocking 26 23 - Washington Union Terminal 56 9 - Harold Interlocking to F Interlocking 28 24 - WAS to CP Virginia 58 10 - F Interlocking to PSNY 30 25 - Springfield to New Haven 60 11 - Penn Terminal 32 27 - Spuyten Duyvil to PSNY* 62 12 - PSNY to Trenton 34 28 - 30th St.
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania Magazine of HISTORY and BIOGRAPHY
    THE Pennsylvania Magazine OF HISTORY AND BIOGRAPHY Dr. Benjamin Rush's Journal of a Trip to Carlisle in 1784 YOU know I love to be in the way of adding to my stock of ideas upon all subjects," Benjamin Rush observed to his wife in a letter of 1787. An insatiable gatherer and recorder of facts and observations, Rush kept journals throughout his life—some continuously over many years, like his Commonplace Books recently edited by Dr. George W. Corner as part of Rush's Autobiography; others for brief periods or for special purposes, like his "Quack Recipe Book" in the Library Company of Philadelphia, his Scottish journal in the Indiana University Library, and the present little diary of a journey from Philadelphia to Carlisle and return in April, 1784. This diary consists of twenty-three duodecimo pages stitched at one edge, and is written entirely in Rush's hand. Owned by a suc- cession of Rush's descendants, it at length came to light in the sale of the Alexander Biddle Papers at the Parke-Bernet Galleries in New York in 1943. (It will be found listed in the Biddle Sale Cata- logue, Part I, lot 219.) It was then purchased by the late Josiah C. Trent, M.D., of Durham, North Carolina, who, when he learned that the present writer was investigating Rush's part in the founding of Dickinson College at Carlisle, very kindly furnished a photostatic 443 444 L. H. BUTTERFIELD October copy of the 1784 journal, together with permission to use it in what- ever way seemed best.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Railroad Administration Record of Decision for the East Side Access Project
    Federal Railroad Administration Record of Decision For the East Side Access Project September 2012 SUMMARY OF DECISION This is a Record of Decision (ROD) of the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), an operating administration of the U.S. Department of Transportation, regarding the East Side Access (ESA) Project. FRA has prepared this ROD in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Council on Environmental Quality’s (CEQ) regulations implementing NEPA, and FRA’s Procedures for Considering Environmental Impacts. The Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) filed an application with the FRA for a loan to finance eligible elements of the ESA Project through the Railroad Rehabilitation and Improvement Financing (RRIF) Program. The ESA Project is the MTA’s largest system expansion in over 100 years. The ESA Project will expand the Long Island Rail Road (LIRR) services by connecting Queens and Long Island with East Midtown Manhattan. With direct LIRR service to Midtown East, the LIRR will further increase its market share of commuters by saving up to 40 minutes per day in subway/bus/sidewalk travel time for commuters who work on Manhattan’s East Side. The ESA Project was previously considered in an environmental impact statement (EIS) prepared by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) in May 2001 and subsequent FTA reevaluations and an environmental assessment of changes in the ESA Project. Construction of the ESA Project has been ongoing since 2001. FRA has reviewed the environmental impacts for the ESA Project identified in the FTA March 2001 Final EIS, subsequent FTA Reevaluations, and the 2006 Supplemental EA/FONSI (collectively, the “2001 EIS”) for the ESA Project and adopted it pursuant to CEQ regulations (40 CFR 1506.3).
    [Show full text]
  • The Long Island Rail Road
    Long Island Rail Road Jamaica, NY September 10, 2018 General Notice No.4-23 Effective 12:01 AM Monday, September 10, 2018 (A) Entire Railroad Timetable Special Instruction 1901-B General Notice replacement pages for Special Instruction 1901-B On Pages I-92 and I-96, Special Instruction 1901-B has been revised as follows: On Pages, I-92 and I-96 under MAIN LINE Kew gardens and Forest Hills, in Sta. Cap. column, “4” has been changed to “6”, in the “6” car column, “H-4” has been changed to “*” and in the 8, 10, 12 car column, “H-4” has been changed to “H-6”. Employees must discard Special Instruction Pages I-91, I-92, I- 95, and I-96 and replace with Replacement Pages “I-91, I-92, I- 95, and I-96” attached to and part of this General Notice. (B) Entire Railroad Timetable Authority – General Notices General Notice 4-21 Paragraph (A1) is annulled General Notice 4-21 Paragraph (A2), 12 switch cross over paragraph – delete “(blocked and spiked normal)” and delete the last two paragraphs in their entirety. General Notice 4-21 Paragraphs (A3), (A4) and (A5) delete “see map on page 12” General Notice 4-21 Paragraph (A6) delete “see map on page 11-13” General Notice 4-21 Paragraphs (A9) and (A10) delete “see map on page 13” General Notice 4-21 Paragraph (C4) delete “6th row containing information related to Giaquinto has been removed.” (C) Entire Railroad Timetable Station Pages Employees must make the following changes in ink: On Page III, Main line Branch, change “FARM 1 R-From Divide” to read “FARM R-From Divide” and change “FARM 2 R-From Divide” to read “PW R-From Divide”.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment a Statement of Work RFQ Number: 6100041691 OVERVIEW: the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (Penndot) Is Respo
    Attachment A Statement of Work RFQ Number: 6100041691 OVERVIEW: The Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) is responsible for the operating costs for the Amtrak Keystone and Pennsylvanian passenger rail services. The Keystone Service provides frequent higher speed passenger train service along the Amtrak part owned Keystone Corridor between the Harrisburg Transportation Center in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania and 30th Street Station in Philadelphia. Some trains continue on the Northeast Corridor and terminate at Pennsylvania Station in New York, and the Pennsylvanian runs between New York and Pittsburgh with stops in between. PennDOT aims to increase ridership on these services as increased revenue offsets the state subsidy for the rail services, which is estimated to be $14.9 million in the 2017 Federal fiscal year. In 2012, PennDOT and Amtrak partnered on PA Trips By Train (www.patripsbytrain.com), an initiative spotlighting events and destinations in communities along the service routes. PennDOT is shifting the campaign’s focus from excursion travelers to commuter travel (Keystone) with the goal of gaining more riders. BACKGROUND NEEDED TO COMPLETE WORK PLAN: In 2014, Amtrak conducted surveys of 402 Keystone customers and 400 Pennsylvanian customers. PennDOT is advising interested vendors to obtain the results of those surveys to better understand the project. Information from those surveys, including gender, age, income, and more is available only by executing a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) with Amtrak. Interested contractors must fully complete and sign Attachment E, Amtrak Market Research Data Nondisclosure. The completed hard copy with an original ink signature must be submitted to Amtrak. Interested vendors wishing to have an original returned must submit two signed copies.
    [Show full text]
  • Dutch Kills Neighborhood of Community District 1 in Queens
    CHAPTER 2: LAND USE, ZONING, AND PUBLIC POLICY A. INTRODUCTION This chapter examines the proposed actions and the anticipated build-out resulting from the proposed actions and its consistency with existing land uses and development trends, compatibility with surrounding areas, and consistency with public policy and zoning regulations. The land use, zoning, and public policy analyses describe the existing conditions in the rezoning area (which will serve as the primary study area in this chapter) and the surrounding secondary study area, as well as future conditions with and without the proposed rezoning and related actions in these same two areas. The analysis identifies anticipated changes in land use, zoning, and public policy independent of the proposed actions by the 2017 build year and then assesses the potential beneficial and adverse impacts to land use, zoning, and public policy as a result of the proposed actions. The rezoning area is located in the Dutch Kills neighborhood of Community District 1 in Queens. The rezoning area is comprised of 36 whole and 4 partial blocks that encompass approximately 70 acres, and is generally bounded by 36th Avenue to the north, Northern Boulevard to the east, 41st Avenue to the south, and 23rd Street to the west. The rezoning area is north and west of the Sunnyside Yards and north of the Queens Plaza Subdistrict and the Special Long Island City Mixed-Use District. The area would generally be rezoned from M1-3D and M1-1 to M1-2 or a mixed-use district (M1-2/R5B, M1-2/R5D, M1-2/R6A and M1-3/R7X) where a Residence District would be paired with a light Manufacturing District.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory -- Nomination Form
    Form No. 10-300 (Rev. 10-74) UNITED STATES DEPARTMEN ,. JF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY -- NOMINATION FORM SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS I NAME HISTORIC Grand Central Terminal AND/OR COMMON Grand Central Terminal LOCATION STREETS,NUMBER 71-105 East 42nd Street _NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY. TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT New York _ VICINITY OF 18th STATE CODE COUNTY CODE New York New York 36 QCLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE _DISTRICT —PUBLIC X2DCCUPIED —AGRICULTURE —MUSEUM 2^BUILDING(S) ^PRIVATE _ UNOCCUPIED X.COMMERCIAL _PARK —STRUCTURE —BOTH —WORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE _S!TE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS _ OBJECT _IN PROCESS —YES: RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC —BEING CONSIDERED X_YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL ^-TRANSPORTATION _NO _ MILITARY —OTHER: OWNER OF PROPERTY NAME Pennsylvania Central Transportation Company STREET & NUMBER 466 Lexington Avenue CITY. TOWN STATE New York VICINITY OF New York LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE, New York County Hall of Records REGISTRY OF DEEDS, ETC. STREET& NUMBER 31 Chambers Street CITY, TOWN STATE New York New York REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE New York City Landmarks Commission DATE 1967 —FEDERAL —STATE —COUNTY x_LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS CITY, TOWN STATE New York New Yn-rlf DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE _EXCELLENT —DETERIORATED —UNALTERED ^-ORIGINAL SITE X_GOOD —RUINS X_ALTERED _MOVED DATE- _FAIR _UNEXPOSED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE A complete contemporary description would be lengthy—in the brief: "The terminal has two levels. The upper one of these, 20 ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Train Station Models Building Guide 2018
    Building Guide for Season’s Greenings: All Aboard! 1 Index of buildings and dioramas Biltmore Depot North Carolina Page 3 Metro-North Cannondale Station Connecticut Page 4 Central Railroad of New Jersey Terminal New Jersey Page 5 Chattanooga Train Shed Tennessee Page 6 Cincinnati Union Terminal Ohio Page 7 Citrus Groves Florida Page 8 Dino Depot -- Page 9 East Glacier Park Station Montana Page 10 Ellicott City Station Maryland Page 11 Gettysburg Lincoln Railroad Station Pennsylvania Page 12 Grain Elevator Minnesota Page 13 Grain Fields Kansas Page 14 Grand Canyon Depot Arizona Page 15 Grand Central Terminal New York Page 16 Kirkwood Missouri Pacific Depot Missouri Page 17 Lahaina Station Hawaii Page 18 Los Angeles Union Station California Page 19 Michigan Central Station Michigan Page 20 North Bennington Depot Vermont Page 21 North Pole Village -- Page 22 Peanut Farms Alabama Page 23 Pennsylvania Station (interior) New York Page 24 Pikes Peak Cog Railway Colorado Page 25 Point of Rocks Station Maryland Page 26 Salt Lake City Union Pacific Depot Utah Page 27 Santa Fe Depot California Page 28 Santa Fe Depot Oklahoma Page 29 Union Station Washington Page 30 Union Station D.C. Page 31 Viaduct Hotel Maryland Page 32 Vicksburg Railroad Barge Mississippi Page 33 2 Biltmore Depot Asheville, North Carolina built 1896 Building Materials Roof: pine bark Facade: bark Door: birch bark, willow, saltcedar Windows: willow, saltcedar Corbels: hollowed log Porch tread: cedar Trim: ash bark, willow, eucalyptus, woody pear fruit, bamboo, reed, hickory nut Lettering: grapevine Chimneys: jequitiba fruit, Kielmeyera fruit, Schima fruit, acorn cap credit: Village Wayside Bar & Grille Wayside Village credit: Designed by Richard Morris Hunt, one of the premier architects in American history, the Biltmore Depot was commissioned by George Washington Vanderbilt III.
    [Show full text]
  • CONSUMING LINCOLN: ABRAHAM LINCOLN's WESTERN MANHOOD in the URBAN NORTHEAST, 1848-1861 a Dissertation Submitted to the Kent S
    CONSUMING LINCOLN: ABRAHAM LINCOLN’S WESTERN MANHOOD IN THE URBAN NORTHEAST, 1848-1861 A dissertation submitted to the Kent State University College of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By David Demaree August 2018 © Copyright All right reserved Except for previously published materials A dissertation written by David Demaree B.A., Geneva College, 2008 M.A., Indiana University of Pennsylvania, 2012 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2018 Approved by ____________________________, Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Kevin Adams, Ph.D. ____________________________, Members, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Elaine Frantz, Ph.D. ____________________________, Lesley J. Gordon, Ph.D. ____________________________, Sara Hume, Ph.D. ____________________________ Robert W. Trogdon, Ph.D. Accepted by ____________________________, Chair, Department of History Brian M. Hayashi, Ph.D. ____________________________, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences James L. Blank, Ph.D. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ..............................................................................................................iii LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS...............................................................................................................v INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Four Historic Neighborhoods of Johnstown, Pennsylvania
    HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDINGS SURVEY/HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD Clemson University 3 1604 019 774 159 The Character of a Steel Mill City: Four Historic Neighborhoods of Johnstown, Pennsylvania ol ,r DOCUMENTS fuBUC '., ITEM «•'\ pEPQS' m 20 1989 m clewson LIBRARY , j„. ft JL^s America's Industrial Heritage Project National Park Service Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2012 with funding from LYRASIS Members and Sloan Foundation http://archive.org/details/characterofsteelOOwall THE CHARACTER OF A STEEL MILL CITY: Four Historic Neighborhoods of Johnstown, Pennsylvania Kim E. Wallace, Editor, with contributions by Natalie Gillespie, Bernadette Goslin, Terri L. Hartman, Jeffrey Hickey, Cheryl Powell, and Kim E. Wallace Historic American Buildings Survey/ Historic American Engineering Record National Park Service Washington, D.C. 1989 The Character of a steel mill city: four historic neighborhoods of Johnstown, Pennsylvania / Kim E. Wallace, editor : with contributions by Natalie Gillespie . [et al.]. p. cm. "Prepared by the Historic American Buildings Survey/Historic American Engineering Record ... at the request of America's Industrial Heritage Project"-P. Includes bibliographical references. 1. Historic buildings-Pennsylvania-Johnstown. 2. Architecture- Pennsylvania-Johnstown. 3. Johnstown (Pa.) --History. 4. Historic buildings-Pennsylvania-Johnstown-Pictorial works. 5. Architecture-Pennsylvania-Johnstown-Pictorial works. 6. Johnstown (Pa.) -Description-Views. I. Wallace, Kim E. (Kim Elaine), 1962- . II. Gillespie, Natalie. III. Historic American Buildings Survey/Historic American Engineering Record. IV. America's Industrial Heritage Project. F159.J7C43 1989 974.877-dc20 89-24500 CIP Cover photograph by Jet Lowe, Historic American Buildings Survey/Historic American Engineering Record staff photographer. The towers of St. Stephen 's Slovak Catholic Church are visible beyond the houses of Cambria City, Johnstown.
    [Show full text]