DOCSLIB.ORG

2 Way All Day GO Train Survey 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

2 Way All Day GO Train Survey 2018 Winter 2018-2019 KEY When explained the concept of a two-way, all day GO Train was explained, TAKEAWAYS an overwhelming majority of Ontarians (80%) support this initiative. Those who support the idea cite And, when presented with a list of reasons for the new service, reduced traffic and traffic congestion reducing traffic congestion and GHGs by taking cars off the highways as the main reason for their support, were slightly more compelling reasons than those tied to while those who oppose the idea say infrastructure, strengthening the technology corridor or attracting they would not be affected by the train talent (although these are also seen to be good reasons). or worry about the cost to taxpayers. Half (51%) say they will use the two-way all day GO train; 13% would use it at least once a week. This number is the same for those live along the corridor but rises to 20% for commuters. The percentage who would “definitely” Moreover, of those who For this reason, it is not surprising or “probably” use the train for work or would use the service most that four in five (81%) believe it is school jumps to 52% among frequently (i.e. once a week important to have a connection to commuters but only stands at 37% for or more) the principal uses Toronto Pearson. residents who live along the line. are for work or school or to go to Toronto Pearson. KEY The People support 2WADGO TAKEAWAYS While support is highest among Torontonians, those who live along the line and commuters, voters in South/West Ontario (77%) and even North/East Ontario (70%) overwhelmingly support 2WADGO. 2WADGO is financially viable Based on our survey, approximately 500,000 Ontarians believe they would use a service liKe this every day and 1,300,000 once a weeK. 2WADGO will make Ontario more competitive and open for business 52% of current Ontario commuters say they would “definitely” or “probably” use this service to go to worK or school. About the Survey Survey Covered 802 Ontario Residents Live along the 302 proposed line 8 minutes to complete (Those living within 20 kms of the proposed line) Rest 500 Conducted October 25th - 30th, 2018 North/East - 157 Toronto - 369 South/West - 276 Importance of Traffic/Traffic Congestion Just a little over half (52%) of Ontarians say traffic and traffic congestion is an important issue. Residents of Toronto, those living with 20 km of the proposed line, and commuters are more inclined to feel this way. What about traffic and traffic congestion? Would you say that it is… An extremely important issue An important issue A somewhat important issue Not much of an issue Not an issue at all DK/NR Total 20% 32% 25% 15% 7% 1% Toronto 30% 42% 21% 5% 2% 1% South/West 12% 27% 27% 25% 9% 1% North/East 13% 19% 29% 22% 17% Live along the proposed line 27% 41% 22% 8% 2% Rest 16% 26% 27% 20% 11% 1% Commuter 23% 35% 24% 12% 6% Non-commuter 17% 29% 25% 20% 9% 1% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Base: ONLINE: Those who did not mention traffic or traffic congestion (n=758). Fieldwork October 25 – 30, 2018 Support for Two-Way All Day Go Train The overwhelming majority of Ontarians (80%) support the proposed service. The two-way all day GO train would run all day, departing every 15-30 minutes and run from downtown Toronto to Kitchener-Waterloo and back with stops at Union, Bramalea, Brampton, Mount Pleasant, Georgetown, Acton, Guelph, Kitchener. When electrified, the average trip between Toronto and Kitchener-Waterloo would take approximately 1 hour and 30 minutes with all stops. Is this something you would strongly support, support, oppose or strongly oppose? Strongly support Support Oppose Strongly oppose DK/NR Total 29% 51% 4% 3% 14% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Base: ONLINE: Total sample (n=802). Fieldwork October 25 – 30, 2018 Support for Two-Way All Day Go Train Especially those who live closest to the proposed line: residents of Toronto, South/West Ontario, and those living within 20 kms of the proposed line. Is this something you would strongly support, support, oppose or strongly oppose? Strongly support Support Oppose Strongly oppose DK/NR Total 29% 51% 4% 3% 14% Toronto 32% 53% 4% 2% 9% South/West 30% 47% 4% 4% 15% North/East 18% 52% 4% 5% 22% Live along the proposed line 36% 49% 3% 2% 10% Rest 24% 52% 4% 4% 16% Commuter 31% 50% 4% 3% 12% Non-commuter 26% 51% 4% 3% 15% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Base: ONLINE: Total sample (n=802). Fieldwork October 25 – 30, 2018 Claimed Use of the Two-Way All Day GO Train Just a little over half (51%) of Ontarians claim they will use the new service; four in ten (40%) say they will never use it. Is a two-way all day GO train like this something that you would use almost every day, a few times a week, once a week, a few times each month, once a month, once every few months or never? DK/NR Almost every day A few times a week 9% 5% Once a week 6% 2% A few times a month 9% 6% Once a month Never 40% 23% Once every few months Base: ONLINE: Total sample (n=802). Fieldwork October 25 – 30, 2018 Claimed Use of the Two-Way All Day GO Train While residents of Toronto, South/West Ontario, those living within 20 kms of the proposed line, and commuters are more likely to use the service, frequent, regular use is not obvious. Is a two-way all day GO train like this something that you would use almost every day, a few times a week, once a week, a few times each month, once a month, once every few months or never? Almost every day Once a week/A few times a week Once a month/A few times a month Once every few months Never DK/NR Total 5% 8% 15% 23% 40% 9% Toronto 6% 7% 15% 27% 39% 7% South/West 3% 8% 17% 24% 39% 8% North/East 7% 10% 8% 15% 47% 13% Live along the proposed line 4% 9% 18% 30% 34% 5% Rest 6% 7% 12% 19% 44% 10% Commuter 8% 11% 16% 23% 34% 9% Non-commuter 2% 5% 14% 24% 48% 7% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Base: ONLINE: Total sample (n=802). Fieldwork October 25 – 30, 2018 Intended Use of a Two-Way All Day GO Train Those intending to use the train showed greater interest in using it for recreational purposes such as visiting friends/family, going on holidays or to travel to Toronto Pearson. There was less interest in using the train for more specific purposes such as commuting to work/school or to seek medical attention. And do you think you would definitely, probably, probably not, or definitely not be using this two-way all day GO train to…? Definitely Probably Probably not Definitely not DK/NR Visit friends or family 32% 40% 15% 8% 5% Go on holidays or for a recreational visit 29% 43% 16% 7% 5% Go to Toronto Pearson International Airport 29% 40% 16% 9% 5% Go to work or school 18% 22% 19% 35% 6% Get medical attention 10% 18% 35% 29% 8% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Base: ONLINE: Those who Claimed they would use the proposed serviCe (n=478). Fieldwork OCtober 25 – 30, 2018 Intended Use of a Two-Way All Day GO Train Those intending to use the train frequently, as in once a week or more, are much more likely to use it to commute to work or school. And do you think you would definitely, probably, probably not, or definitely not be using this two-way all day GO train to…? CLAIMED FREQUENCY OF USE: ONCE A WEEK OR MORE Definitely Probably Probably not Defnitely not DK/NR Go to Toronto Pearson International Airport 50% 32% 7% 6% 5% Go to work or school 50% 28% 3% 15% 3% Visit family/friends 48% 32% 13% 6% 1% Go on holidays or for a recreational visit 41% 43% 9% 5% 2% Get medical attention 21% 30% 26% 18% 5% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Base: ONLINE: Those who Claimed they would use the proposed serviCe onCe a week or more (n=102). Fieldwork OCtober 25 – 30, 2018 Intend to Use the Train to go to Work or School Commuters are more inclined to use the train. And do you think you would definitely, probably, probably not, or definitely not be using this two-way all day GO train to go to work or school? Definitely Probably Probably not Definitely not Total 18% 22% 19% 35% Commuters 25% 27% 21% 21% Live along the proposed line 12% 25% 17% 41% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Base: ONLINE: Those who claimed they would use the proposed service (n=478). Fieldwork October 25 – 30, 2018 Reasons to have a Two-Way All Day GO Train Ontarians believe the reasons to have a train like this are all good. Reasons tied to a reduction in traffic congestion and greenhouse gas emissions are slightly more compelling than infrastructure, economic and employment reasons. Different people have offered different reasons as to why they think we should have a two-way all day GO train between Toronto and Kitchener-Waterloo. Please indicate whether you think each of the following is a very good, good, so-so, poor or very poor reason for why we should have a train like this? Very good Good So-so Poor Very poor DK/NR Reduce traffic congestion by taking cars off the highway 60% 26% 8% 3% Reduce GHGs by taking cars off the highway 53% 28% 11% 4% Provides much needed infrastructure 39% 38% 13% 6% Help the economy by creating new Jobs 34% 38% 17% 3% 6% Strengthen the technology corridor 33% 38% 17% 3% 7% Help companies access talent to grow/remain competitive 28% 41% 18% 4% 7% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Base: ONLINE: Total sample (n=802).
Recommended publications
  • Area 83 Eastern Ontario International Area Committee Minutes June 2

    Area 83 Eastern Ontario International Area Committee Minutes June 2

    ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS AREA 83 EASTERN ONTARIO INTERNATIONAL Area 83 Eastern Ontario International Area Committee Minutes June 2, 2018 ACM – June 2, 2018 1 ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS AREA 83 EASTERN ONTARIO INTERNATIONAL 1. OPENING…………………………………………………………………………….…………….…4 2. REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA………………………………….…………….…...7 3. ROLL CALL………………………………………………………………………….……………….7 4. REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES OF September 9, 2017 ACM…………………7 5. DISTRICT COMMITTEE MEMBERS’ REPORTS ……………………………………………....8 District 02 Malton……………………………………………………………………………….…….. 8 District 06 Mississauga……………………………………………………………………….…….. 8 District 10 Toronto South Central…………………………………………………………….….…. 8 District 12 Toronto South West………………………………………………………………….…. 9 District 14 Toronto North Central………………………………………………………………..….. 9 District 16 Distrito Hispano de Toronto…………………………………………………….………..9 District 18 Toronto City East……………………………………………………………………........9 District 22 Scarborough……………………………………………………………………………… 9 District 26 Lakeshore West………………………………………………………………….……….10 District 28 Lakeshore East……………………………………………………………………………11 District 30 Quinte West…………………………………………………………………………….. 11 District 34 Quinte East……………………………………………………………………………… 12 District 36 Kingston & the Islands……………………………………………………………….… 12 District 42 St. Lawrence International………………………………………………………………. 12 District 48 Seaway Valley North……………………………………………………………….……. 13 District 50 Cornwall…………………………………………………………………………………… 13 District 54 Ottawa Rideau……………………………………………………………………………. 13 District 58 Ottawa Bytown……………………………………………………………………………
  • MINISTRY of CORRECTIONS Facilities AREA 83

    MINISTRY of CORRECTIONS Facilities AREA 83

    MINISTRY OF CORRECTIONS Facilities AREA 83 Name of Facility Address Contact Numbers Area / District Brockville Jail 613-341-2870 10 Wall St. Fax: 613-342-0962 Area 83 Brockville, ON K6V 4R9 District 66 Golden Triangle Ontario 905-457-7050 109 McLaughlin Rd. S. Correctional Institute Fax: 905-452-8606 Area 83 Brampton, ON L6Y 2C8 District 02 Malton St. Lawrence Valley 613-341-2870 Area 83 PO Box 8000 1804 Hwy 2 Correctional & Fax: 613-345-3844 E. Treatment Centre District 66 Golden Triangle Brockville, ON K6V 7N2 Central East 705-328-6000 Area 83 Correctional Centre 541 Hwy 36 Fax: 705-328-6001 Lindsay, ON K9V 6H2 District 86 Kawartha Quinte 613-354-9701 89 Richmond Blvd. Area 83 Detention Centre Fax: 613-354-1209 Napanee, ON K7R 3S1 District 34 Quinte East Ottawa-Carleton Detention 613-824-6080 Area 83 Centre 2244 Innes Road Fax: 613-824-0732 Ottawa, ON K1B 4C4 District 54 Ottawa Rideau Toronto South Detention Center 160 Horner Ave. Area 83 Etobicoke, Ont District 6/18 Toronto Intermittent Centre 160 Horner Ave. (TIC) Etobicoke, Ont Toronto East 416-750-3513 Area 83 55 Civic Rd. Detention Centre Fax: 416-750-3345 Toronto (Scarborough), District 22 Scarborough ON M1L 2K9 1 of 1 FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES AREA 83 ONTARIO REGION Institutions Regional Treatment Centre (Max) Millhaven Institution (Max) 560 King Street West Highway 33 PO Box 22 PO Box 280 Kingston, Ontario K7L 4V7 Bath, Ontario K0H 1G0 (613) 536-6901 (613) 351-8000 Fax: (613) 536-4115 Fax: (613) 351-8136 A/Executive Director: Kathy Hinch Warden: Curtis Jackson District
  • The Canadian Parliamentary Guide

    The Canadian Parliamentary Guide

    NUNC COGNOSCO EX PARTE THOMAS J. BATA LI BRARY TRENT UNIVERSITY us*<•-« m*.•• ■Jt ,.v<4■■ L V ?' V t - ji: '^gj r ", •W* ~ %- A V- v v; _ •S I- - j*. v \jrfK'V' V ■' * ' ’ ' • ’ ,;i- % »v • > ». --■ : * *S~ ' iJM ' ' ~ : .*H V V* ,-l *» %■? BE ! Ji®». ' »- ■ •:?■, M •* ^ a* r • * «'•# ^ fc -: fs , I v ., V', ■ s> f ** - l' %% .- . **» f-•" . ^ t « , -v ' *$W ...*>v■; « '.3* , c - ■ : \, , ?>?>*)■#! ^ - ••• . ". y(.J, ■- : V.r 4i .» ^ -A*.5- m “ * a vv> w* W,3^. | -**■ , • * * v v'*- ■ ■ !\ . •* 4fr > ,S<P As 5 - _A 4M ,' € - ! „■:' V, ' ' ?**■- i.." ft 1 • X- \ A M .-V O' A ■v ; ■ P \k trf* > i iwr ^.. i - "M - . v •?*»-• -£-. , v 4’ >j- . *•. , V j,r i 'V - • v *? ■ •.,, ;<0 / ^ . ■'■ ■ ,;• v ,< */ ■" /1 ■* * *-+ ijf . ^--v- % 'v-a <&, A * , % -*£, - ^-S*.' J >* •> *' m' . -S' ?v * ... ‘ *•*. * V .■1 *-.«,»'• ■ 1**4. * r- * r J-' ; • * “ »- *' ;> • * arr ■ v * v- > A '* f ' & w, HSi.-V‘ - .'">4-., '4 -' */ ' -',4 - %;. '* JS- •-*. - -4, r ; •'ii - ■.> ¥?<* K V' V ;' v ••: # * r * \'. V-*, >. • s s •*•’ . “ i"*■% * % «. V-- v '*7. : '""•' V v *rs -*• * * 3«f ' <1k% ’fc. s' ^ * ' .W? ,>• ■ V- £ •- .' . $r. « • ,/ ••<*' . ; > -., r;- •■ •',S B. ' F *. ^ , »» v> ' ' •' ' a *' >, f'- \ r ■* * is #* ■ .. n 'K ^ XV 3TVX’ ■■i ■% t'' ■ T-. / .a- ■ '£■ a« .v * tB• f ; a' a :-w;' 1 M! : J • V ^ ’ •' ■ S ii 4 » 4^4•M v vnU :^3£'" ^ v .’'A It/-''-- V. - ;ii. : . - 4 '. ■ ti *%?'% fc ' i * ■ , fc ' THE CANADIAN PARLIAMENTARY GUIDE AND WORK OF GENERAL REFERENCE I9OI FOR CANADA, THE PROVINCES, AND NORTHWEST TERRITORIES (Published with the Patronage of The Parliament of Canada) Containing Election Returns, Eists and Sketches of Members, Cabinets of the U.K., U.S., and Canada, Governments and Eegisla- TURES OF ALL THE PROVINCES, Census Returns, Etc.
  • ANNUAL REPORT 2019-2020 Office of the Ombudsman of Ontario 483 Bay Street 10Th Floor, South Tower Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C9

    ANNUAL REPORT 2019-2020 Office of the Ombudsman of Ontario 483 Bay Street 10Th Floor, South Tower Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C9

    ONTA RIO ONTARIO’S WATCHDOG ANNUAL REPORT 2019-2020 Office of the Ombudsman of Ontario 483 Bay Street 10th Floor, South Tower Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C9 Telephone: 416-586-3300 Complaints line: 1-800-263-1830 Fax: 416-586-3485 TTY: 1-866-411-4211 Website: www.ombudsman.on.ca @Ont_Ombudsman Ontario Ombudsman OntarioOmbudsman OntOmbuds ISSN 1708-0851 ONTA RIO ONTARIO’S WATCHDOG June 2020 Hon. Ted Arnott, Speaker Legislative Assembly Province of Ontario Queen’s Park Dear Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to submit my Annual Report for the period of April 1, 2019 to March 31, 2020, pursuant to section 11 of the Ombudsman Act, so that you may table it before the Legislative Assembly. Sincerely, Paul Dubé Ombudsman Office of the Ombudsman of Ontario 483 Bay Street 10th Floor, South Tower Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C9 Telephone: 416-583-3300 Complaints line: 1-800-263-1830 Website: www.ombudsman.on.ca Office of the Ombudsman of Ontario • 2019-2020 Annual Report 1 2 Office of the Ombudsman of Ontario • 2019-2020 Annual Report YEAR IN REVIEW • TEXT TABLE OF CONTENTS OMBUDSMAN’S MESSAGE .........................................................................................................5 2019-2020 AT A GLANCE ............................................................................................................8 ABOUT OUR OFFICE .................................................................................................................10 HOW WE WORK .........................................................................................................................................................................12
  • Parliamentary Representation 573

    Parliamentary Representation 573

    PARLIAMENTARY REPRESENTATION 573 1.—Representation in tbe House of Commons according to the Districts of the Representation Act, 1914r—con. Popu­ Repre­ Popu­ Repre­ Provinces and Districts. lation, senta­ Provinces and Districts. lation, senta­ 1911. tion. 1911. tion. Quebec—concluded: Ontario—con. Joliette 23,911 Dundas 25,973 Kamouraska 20,888 Durham 26,411 Labelle 31,149 Elgin E 17,597 Laprairie-Napierville 19,335 Elgin W....; 26,715 L'Assomption-Montcalm. 28,506 • Essex N.: 38,006 Laval-Deux-Montagnes... 25,275 Essex S 29,541 Levis 28,913 Fort William and Rainy L'lslet 1-6,435 River 33,626 Lotbiniere 22,158 Frontenac 21,944 Maskinonge 16,509 Glengarry and Stormont. 38,226 Matane 27,539 Grenville 17,545 Megantic 31,314 Grey N 33,957 Missiquoi : 17,466 Grey S '. 31,934 Montmagny 17,356 Haldimand 21,562 Montreal Island— Hal ton 22,208 Hochelaga 44,884 Hamilton E 39,793 Jacques Cartier 55,943 Hamilton W 37,279 Laurier-Outremont 45,176 Hastings E 24,978 Maisonneuve 33,796 Hastings W 30,825 Ste. Anne 41,541 Huron N 26,886 St. Antoine 34,794 Huron S 26,097 St. Denis 45,141 Kent 52,439 Westmount-St. Henri... 56,088 Kinsgton 20,660 St. James 44,057 Lambton E 25,779 St. Laurent-St. George. 38,883 Lambton W 29,109 George-Etienne Cartier 51,937 Lanark 34,375 St. Mary 62,521 Leeds 36,753 Nicoiet 30,055 Lennox and Addington. .. 20,386 Pontiac 29,416 Lincoln 35,429 Portneuf 30,260 London '.
  • Divided Diasporas: Southern Africans in Canada

    Divided Diasporas: Southern Africans in Canada

    Wilfrid Laurier University Scholars Commons @ Laurier Southern African Migration Programme Reports and Papers 2013 Divided Diasporas: Southern Africans in Canada Jonathan Crush Balsillie School of International Affairs/WLU, [email protected] Abel Chikanda University of Kansas Wade Pendleton University of Cape Town Mary Caesar Queen's University - Kingston, Ontario Sujata Ramachandran Southern African Migration Programme See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/samp Part of the Human Geography Commons, Migration Studies Commons, and the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Crush, J., Chikanda, A., Pendleton, W., Caesar, M., Ramachandran, S., Eberhardt, C., Hill, A. (2013). Divided Diasporas: Southern Africans in Canada (pp. i-100). Vienna: International Centre for Migration Policy Development and Waterloo, ON: Southern African Migration Programme. This SAMP Special Reports is brought to you for free and open access by the Reports and Papers at Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Southern African Migration Programme by an authorized administrator of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Jonathan Crush, Abel Chikanda, Wade Pendleton, Mary Caesar, Sujata Ramachandran, Cassandra Eberhardt, and Ashley Hill This samp special reports is available at Scholars Commons @ Laurier: https://scholars.wlu.ca/samp/2 DIVIDED DIASPORAS Southern Africans in Canada SPECIAL REPORT DIVIDED DIASPORAS Southern Africans in Canada SPECIAL REPORT Jonathan Crush, Abel Chikanda, Wade Pendleton, Mary Caesar, Sujata Ramachandran, Cassandra Eberhardt and Ashley Hill Copyright © 2013 by Jonathan Crush, Abel Chikanda, Wade Pendleton, Mary Caesar, Sujata Ramachandran, Cassandra Eberhardt and Ashley Hill. Published by The Centre for International Governance Innovation and the Southern African Migration Programme.
  • GET TORONTO MOVING Transportation Plan

    GET TORONTO MOVING Transportation Plan

    2 ‘GET TORONTO MOVING’ TRANSPORTATION PLAN SUMMARY REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Who we are 4 Policy 4 Rapid Transit Subways 5 Findings of the 1985 ‘Network 2011’ TTC Study 6 Transit Projects Around The World 6 ‘SmartTrack’ 7 GO Trains 7 Roads 10 Elevated Gardiner Expressway 12 Bicycle Trails 14 Funding 16 Toronto Transportation History Timeline 17 BIBLIOGRAPHY ‘Network 2011’ TTC Report 1985 Boro Lukovic – tunnelling expert Globe and Mail newspaper GO Transit Canadian Automobile Association Canada Pension Plan Investment Board Ontario Teachers Pension Fund Investment Board City of Toronto Metrolinx 3 WHO WE ARE The task force who have contributed to this plan consist of: James Alcock – Urban transportation planner Bruce Bryer – Retired TTC employee Kurt Christensen – political advisor and former Scarborough City Councillor Bill Robertson – Civil Engineer Kevin Walters – Civil Engineer POLICY There are two ways needed to end traffic gridlock: High-capacity rapid transit and improved traffic flow. The overall guiding policy of this plan is: the "Get Toronto Moving' Transportation Plan oversees policies and projects with the goal of improving the efficiency of all modes of transportation which are the choices of the people of Toronto, including automobiles, public transit, cycling and walking within available corridors. The City has no place to ‘encourage’ or entice people to switch to different forms of transportation from what they regularly use. That is the free choice of the people. The City and the Province are only responsible for providing the facilities for the transportation choices of the people. Neighbourhoods and residential and commercial communities must be left intact to flourish.
  • Conservation and the Crosstown: Exploring the Intersection of Retail Heritage and Transportation Infrastructure in Toronto

    Conservation and the Crosstown: Exploring the Intersection of Retail Heritage and Transportation Infrastructure in Toronto

    CONSERVATION AND THE CROSSTOWN: EXPLORING THE INTERSECTION OF RETAIL HERITAGE AND TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE IN TORONTO By: Sophia Sousa Supervised By: Laura E. Taylor A Major Paper submitted to the Faculty of Environmental Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Environmental Studies York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada November 29, 2018 CONTENTS CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................................................................. i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................................................. ii ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................................................... iii FOREWORD ................................................................................................................................................... iv INTERSECTING THE PLAN OF STUDY .......................................................................................................... v INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................. 1 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................................................ 6 CHAPTER 1 ...................................................................................................................................................
  • Lakeview: Journey from Yesterday Kathleen A

    Lakeview: Journey from Yesterday Kathleen A

    Lakeview: Journey From Yesterday Kathleen A. Hicks LAKEVIEW: JOURNEY FROM YESTERDAY is published by The Friends of the Mississauga Library System 301 Burnhamthorpe Road, West, Mississauga, Ontario, L5B 3Y3 Copyright © 2005 by the Mississauga Library System All rights reserved Lakeview: Journey From Yesterday ISBN 0-9697873-6-7 II Written by Kathleen A. Hicks Cover design by Stephen Wahl Graphic layout by Joe and Joyce Melito Lakeview Sign by Stephen Wahl Back Cover photo by Stephen Wahl No part of this publication may be produced in any form without the written permission of the Mississauga Library System. Brief passages may be quoted for books, newspaper or magazine articles, crediting the author and title. For photographs contact the source. Extreme care has been taken where copyright of pictures is concerned and if any errors have occurred, the author extends her utmost apology. Care also has been taken with research material. If anyone encounters any discrepancy with the facts contained herein, (Region of Peel Archives) please send your written information to the author in care of the Mississauga Library System. Lakeview: Journey From Yesterday Other Books By Kathleen A. Hicks (Stephen Wahl) III The Silverthorns: Ten Generations in America Kathleen Hicks’ V.I.P.s of Mississauga The Life & Times of the Silverthorns of Cherry Hill Clarkson and its Many Corners Meadowvale: Mills to Millennium VIDEO Riverwood: The Estate Dreams are Made of IV Dedication dedicate this book to my family, the Groveses of Lakeview, where I was born. My grandfather, Thomas Jordan, and my father, Thomas Henry, were instrumental in building many houses and office buildings across southern Ontario.
  • 2019-2020 Annual Report 1 This Page Has Been Intentionally Left Blank

    2019-2020 Annual Report 1 This Page Has Been Intentionally Left Blank

    ONTA RIO ONTARIO’S WATCHDOG ANNUAL REPORT 2019-2020 Office of the Ombudsman of Ontario 483 Bay Street 10th Floor, South Tower Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C9 Telephone: 416-586-3300 Complaints line: 1-800-263-1830 Fax: 416-586-3485 TTY: 1-866-411-4211 Website: www.ombudsman.on.ca @Ont_Ombudsman Ontario Ombudsman OntarioOmbudsman OntOmbuds ISSN 1708-0851 ONTA RIO ONTARIO’S WATCHDOG June 2020 Hon. Ted Arnott, Speaker Legislative Assembly Province of Ontario Queen’s Park Dear Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to submit my Annual Report for the period of April 1, 2019 to March 31, 2020, pursuant to section 11 of the Ombudsman Act, so that you may table it before the Legislative Assembly. Sincerely, Paul Dubé Ombudsman Office of the Ombudsman of Ontario 483 Bay Street 10th Floor, South Tower Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C9 Telephone: 416-583-3300 Complaints line: 1-800-263-1830 Website: www.ombudsman.on.ca Office of the Ombudsman of Ontario • 2019-2020 Annual Report 1 This page has been intentionally left blank 2 Office of the Ombudsman of Ontario • 2019-2020 Annual Report YEAR IN REVIEW • TEXT TABLE OF CONTENTS OMBUDSMAN’S MESSAGE .........................................................................................................5 2019-2020 AT A GLANCE ............................................................................................................8 ABOUT OUR OFFICE .................................................................................................................10 HOW WE WORK .........................................................................................................................................................................12
  • District 123 Alignment for 2021-2022 - Draft 2 - Released Feb 11, 2021

    District 123 Alignment for 2021-2022 - Draft 2 - Released Feb 11, 2021

    The D123 Alignment initiative for 2021-2022 gives us the unique opportunity to create an entirely new District. For the first time in Toastmaster’s history, a new District is being formed by combining portions of two others (District 60 & 86) to create a new one (District 123). The District boundaries were established by Toastmasters International on August 9, 2019. They cannot be changed and are beyond the scope of this annual Alignment process. Our challenge is to work within the parameters given to the team. In Broad terms, the D123 boundaries are: From District 60 Central Ontario Region (Toronto—north of Dixon/Scarlett/Lawrence Avenue, Hastings, Prince Edward, Northumberland, Peterborough, Kawartha Lakes, Durham & Haliburton) From District 86 Western Ontario Region (Peel—Brampton & Caledon only, Simcoe & Dufferin) Central Ontario Region (York, Muskoka & Parry Sound) Northern Ontario Region (Nipissing, Manitoulin, Sudbury, Greater Sudbury, Timiskaming, Cochrane & Algoma) Our guiding principles for the alignment are: · At least 3 Areas per Division · 4-6 Clubs per Area or 3 Clubs plus a viable prospective club · Finding balance so that Clubs, Areas and Divisions can participate in the Distinguished program All clubs in the geographic boundary of District 123 will be considered. Prospective clubs expected to launch by June 30th will also be considered. D123 Alignment for 2021-2022 Draft #2 - Feb 11, 2021 Page 1 of 31 Your Alignment Team is published on the D60 and D86 websites and in the pages and tabs of this Alignment Report. The representation on the team ensures that all members are well represented. Our overriding principle is that we are working for all members to help provide them with the best opportunity possible for an inspiring Toastmasters experience.
  • Area 83 Eastern Ontario International Area Assembly Minutes October 29

    Area 83 Eastern Ontario International Area Assembly Minutes October 29

    ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS AREA 83 EASTERN ONTARIO INTERNATIONAL Area 83 Eastern Ontario International Area Assembly Minutes October 29, 2017 FALL ASSEMBLY 2017 - 1 - ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS AREA 83 EASTERN ONTARIO INTERNATIONAL SUNDAY OCTOBER 29, 2017 - 9:00 A.M. - WEST BALLROOM 1. Opening P. 4 2. Review and Acceptance of Agenda P. 7 3. Review and Acceptance of Minutes from the Spring Assembly March 26, 2017 P. 8 4. District Committee Members' Reports (in pre-drawn sequence) P. 8 District 14 Toronto North Central Dave B District 82 Victoria Haliburton Janice D District 74 Pembroke Bill C District 34 Quinte East Gord T District 36 Kingston & The Islands Martin St-L District 66 Golden Triangle Jenny C District 70 Renfrew Pontiac Seanna B District 54 Ottawa Rideau Bartosz W District 42 St. Lawrence International Pat M District 10 Toronto South Central Rob A District 28 Lakeshore East JoAnn P District 30 Quinte West Ian W District 06 Mississauga David B District 18 Toronto City East Michael A District 22 Scarborough Tom S District 50 Cornwall Kimberley C District 26 Lakeshore West Dave L District 86 Kawartha Larry D District 16 Distrito Hispano De Toronto Angie R District 58 Ottawa Bytown Michel D District 02 Malton Shane H District 62 Ottawa West Mike B District 48 Seaway Valley North Winnie S District 12 Toronto South West Mark B District 78 Madawaska Valley Ann Marie VanDenH 5. Committee Chairpersons Reports: P. 18 Public Information Les M. Cooperation with the Professional Community Jim S. Correctional Facilities Mac B. Treatment Facilities Marty M. Grapevine Robert B.