DOCSLIB.ORG

The International System and the Northern Ireland Peace Process

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The International System and the Northern Ireland Peace Process Provided by the author(s) and University College Dublin Library in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite the published version when available. Title The international system and the Northern Ireland peace process Authors(s) Guelke, Adrian Publication date 2002 Conference details Paper presented to the IBIS conference Renovation or revolution? new territorial politics in Ireland and the United Kingdom, University College Dublin, 3 April 2002. Series IBIS Working Papers; No. 21 Publisher University College Dublin. Institute for British-Irish Studies Item record/more information http://hdl.handle.net/10197/2255 Downloaded 2021-09-26T00:19:51Z The UCD community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters! (@ucd_oa) © Some rights reserved. For more information, please see the item record link above. THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM AND THE NORTHERN IRELAND PEACE PROCESS Adrian Guelke IBISIBIS working working paper paper no. no. 21 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM AND THE NORTHERN IRELAND PEACE PROCESS Adrian Guelke Working Papers in British-Irish Studies No. 21, 2002 Institute for British-Irish Studies University College Dublin IBIS working papers No. 21, 2002 © the author, 2002 ISSN 1649-0304 ABSTRACT THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM AND THE NORTHERN IRELAND PEACE PROCESS The paper examines the impact of two major events in the international system on the peace process: the end of the Cold War and the attack on America on 11 Sep- tember 2001. The thesis first advanced by Michael Cox that change in the interna- tional context of the conflict in Northern Ireland was a major influence in pressuris- ing the republican movement to adopt its peace strategy in the early 1990s is ana- lysed. Also examined are reasons why the thesis has proved so contentious and why more generally there remains considerable scepticism as to the capacity of ex- ternal events to shape events in Ireland in any fundamental way. The question of the impact of September 11 is then addressed. Publication information Paper presented to the IBIS conference Renovation or revolution? new territorial politics in Ireland and the United Kingdom, University College Dublin, 3 April 2002. BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION Adrian Guelke is Director of the Centre for the Study of Ethnic Conflict at Queen’s University, Belfast. His research interests include the politics of deeply divided so- cieties, most particularly the cases of South Africa and Northern Ireland, compari- son of deeply divided societies, political violence, terrorism. Selected publications include: A farewell to arms? From “long war” to long peace in Northern Ireland (co- editor; Manchester University Press, 2000); South Africa in transition: the misun- derstood miracle (I.B. Tauris, 1999); The police, public order and the state (co- author; 2nd ed., Macmillan, 1996); The age of terrorism and the international politi- cal system (I.B. Tauris, 1995); New perspectives on the Northern Ireland conflict (editor; Avebury, 1994); Northern Ireland: the international perspective (Gill and Macmillan, 1988). THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM AND THE NORTHERN IRELAND PEACE PROCESS Adrian Guelke INTRODUCTION In my exploration of the impact of the international political system on the peace process in Northern Ireland, I am going to focus on two events that have been widely seen as significant watersheds in world politics. They are associated with two dates: 9 November 1989, when the Berlin Wall came down, and 11 September 2001, when the United States mainland was attacked by Al Qaeda. The first is linked to the broader process of the end of the Cold War; the second to a commit- ment by the most powerful state in the world to “a war against international terror- ism”. Sufficient time has passed since the end of the Cold War to provide the basis for considered opinions to have developed on the implications for Ireland of the first of these. That is not true of “the war against international terrorism”, so inevitably this part of the paper will necessarily be more speculative. Paradoxically it is also true to say that there has been less controversy over the impact of September 11, a reflection of the fact that settled opinion on its impact is harder to come by. THE END OF THE COLD WAR AND THE PEACE PROCESS Let me start with the end of the Cold War. The person most closely associated with the argument that the end of the Cold War had a major impact on the Irish peace process is Professor Michael Cox of the University of Wales, Aberystwyth. He first put forward the argument in an article in the October 1997 issue of International Af- fairs (Cox, 1997). He repeated it in his Frank Wright Memorial Lecture of February 1998 and in the book he co-edited with myself and Fiona Stephen, A Farewell to Arms?, published in 2000, as well as in a number of other journal articles. However, his most succinct statement of his argument is to be found in an article in the De- cember 1997/January 1998 issue of the magazine, Fortnight. I will quote the key passage: My thesis, simply stated, is that although the IRA ceasefire might have occurred without the end of the Cold War, the fact that the Cold War had drawn to a close made a ceasefire far more likely. Of course, the relationship between the end of the wider international conflict and the August 1994 announcement was never direct. What I am suggesting is that by altering completely the global framework within which the IRA campaign had hitherto been conducted, the end of the Cold War made it far more difficult for the organisation to legitimise a strategy which by the late 1980s had already reached a dead end. Moreover, with the end of the Cold War, a number of critical changes occurred in the structure of the international system. These not only challenged traditional republican thinking about the reasons for the British presence IBIS WORKING PAPER NO. 21 IBIS WORKING PAPERS NO. 21, 2002 in Ireland, but also presented its leaders with a unique opportunity which they felt could be exploited to their advantage. In particular, playing the “American card” to accelerate a peace process about which many on the British side had deep reserva- tions. Finally, as an organisation with a radical agenda, it was almost inevitable that the end of the Cold War, and with it the collapse of the wider revolutionary project, would influence the republican movement. (Cox, 1997-98: 20) Chatham House organised a lunchtime meeting on the peace process in Northern Ireland to coincide with the publication of Professor Cox’s article entitled “Bringing in the ‘international’: the IRA ceasefire and the end of the Cold War”. The meeting in late 1997 occurred shortly after a visit by Tony Blair to Northern Ireland, at which he shook hands with Gerry Adams for the first time. The prevailing mood of the meeting was not sympathetic either to the arguments that Professor Cox advanced on the international context of the peace process or to the peace process itself. There was widespread suspicion of the intentions of the republican movement. The principal line of argument of Professor Cox’s critics was that the ceasefire was a ploy to extract concessions from the government and that, unlike the end of the Cold War, it was a reversible decision, as its breakdown between February 1996 and July 1997 had already demonstrated. A number of speakers argued that the paramilitary ceasefires amounted simply to a truce in a long-running and ultimately unsolvable conflict. When Professor Cox presented his arguments in Belfast in February 1998 to an audience that included a number of specialists in the field of Irish politics, the case he presented also encountered considerable scepticism. But the basis of the criti- cisms was less hostility to the peace process than the conviction that it was a prod- uct of dynamics internal to Northern Ireland. In particular, for a number of Cox’s Belfast critics, it was the military defeat of the Provisionals’ campaign of violence in Northern Ireland that provided the key to explaining the ceasefires. However, since Cox was always careful not to dismiss the role that internal factors had played in bringing about an end to the troubles, it was difficult to fathom why the Cox thesis highlighting external factors should have provoked quite so much opposition. In his review of A Farewell to Arms?, Jonathan Tonge recounts another occasion on which a critic “demanded that the author be ‘more parsimonious’ with his variables” (Tonge 2001). Tonge himself faults Cox for the omission of important internal fac- tors and a suspect chronology. Tonge continues: Arguably the biggest shift from fundamentalist to pragmatic republicanism (at least before entry to Stormont in 1998) came with the decision of Sinn Féin to recognise the “partitionist” Dail Eireann in 1986, at a time when few were predicting the end of the Cold War, but internal republican critics (e.g. Ruairi O’Bradaigh) forecast later en- try to Stormont. Similarly, the willingness to engage in dialogue with the SDLP in 1988, again pre-collapse of the Berlin Wall, was indicative of the republican move- ment seeking an exit strategy from a war it could not win. Add the fact that republi- cans were suffering more losses than loyalists by the early 1990s and the internal thesis appears more convincing. (Tonge 2001: 263) I would not disagree with the proposition that there was a shift in republican think- ing in the late 1980s, not least as a by-product of the Anglo-Irish agreement of No- -2- Guelke / The international system and the peace process vember 1985. However, I would dispute the notion that it was more significant than the change that occurred in the 1990s.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Lessons of Northern Ireland: Lessons of Northern Ireland and the Relevance of the Regional Context
    Adrian Guelke The lessons of Northern Ireland: lessons of Northern Ireland and the relevance of the regional context Report Original citation: Guelke, Adrian (2011) The lessons of Northern Ireland: lessons of Northern Ireland and the relevance of the regional context. IDEAS reports - special reports, Kitchen, Nicholas (ed.) SR008. LSE IDEAS, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK. This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/43485/ Originally available from LSE IDEAS Available in LSE Research Online: May 2012 © 2011 The Author LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. Lessons of Northern Ireland and the Relevance of the Regional Context Adrian Guelke t should be stated at the outset that the notion of Northern Ireland’s political settlement Ias a model for other societies evokes as much hostility as it does enthusiasm. Indeed, at least as much has been written in criticism of the idea of Northern Ireland as a model as in its support. Understanding the perspective of the critics on this issue is a useful starting point for reviewing the lessons to be learnt from the application to Northern Ireland of a variety of counter terrorism and conflict resolution policies, since it provides a means of sorting out in which respects Northern Ireland’s experience might be relevant to other cases and in which it is not.
    [Show full text]
  • The Referendum in FW De Klerk's War of Manoeuvre
    The referendum in F.W. de Klerk’s war of manoeuvre: An historical institutionalist account of the 1992 referendum. Gary Sussman. London School of Economics and Political Science. Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Government and International History, 2003 UMI Number: U615725 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615725 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 T h e s e s . F 35 SS . Library British Library of Political and Economic Science Abstract: This study presents an original effort to explain referendum use through political science institutionalism and contributes to both the comparative referendum and institutionalist literatures, and to the political history of South Africa. Its source materials are numerous archival collections, newspapers and over 40 personal interviews. This study addresses two questions relating to F.W. de Klerk's use of the referendum mechanism in 1992. The first is why he used the mechanism, highlighting its role in the context of the early stages of his quest for a managed transition.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction
    Notes 1 Introduction 1. For an understanding of the background to the Northern Ireland conflict see Paul Bew and Gordon Gillespie, Northern Ireland: A Chronology of the Troubles 1968–1999 (Dublin: Gill & Macmillan, 1999); Brendan O’Leary and John McGarry, Explaining Northern Ireland (Oxford: Blackwell, 1995); and Jennifer Todd and Joseph Ruane, The Dynamics of Conflict in Northern Ireland: Power, Conflict and Emancipation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996). 2. Inter-party talks were launched by the Secretary of State, Peter Brooke, in January 1990. These continued after the 1992 British general election under Sir Patrick Mayhew. See David Bloomfield, Political Dialogue in Northern Ireland: The Brooke Initiative, 1989–1992 (London: Macmillan, 1998). 3. The Agreement was unofficially dubbed the ‘Good Friday Agreement’ because it was signed on Good Friday, two days before Easter Sunday. However, the Agreement is also referred to as the ‘Belfast Agreement’ because it was signed in Belfast. The official document is simply titled ‘The Agreement’. 4. Hugh Miall, Oliver Ramsbotham and Tom Woodhouse, Contemporary Conflict Resolution (Oxford: Polity Press, 1999) p. 154. 5. See Cynthia Arnson, ed., Comparative Peace Processes in Latin America (Cali- fornia; Stanford University Press, 1999); John Darby and Roger MacGinty, eds, The Management of Peace Processes (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2000); John Darby and Roger MacGinty, Contemporary Peace Making: Conflict, Viol- ence and Peace Processes (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003); Chester A. Crocker, Fen Osler Hampson, and Pamela Aall, eds, Turbulent Peace: The Challenges of Managing International Conflict (Washington DC: United States Institute of Peace Press, 2001); and Chester A. Crocker, Fen Osler Hampson and Pamela Aall, eds, Managing Global Chaos: Sources of and Responses to International Conflict (Washington DC: United States Institute of Peace Press, 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Cronin-Sheehan Interviews 2001 and 2002
    Cronin-Sheehan Interviews 2001 and 2002 The two interviews I did with Jeremy Cronin in 2001 and 2002 met with a storm of controversy and were much discussed in the mass media and at political meetings as well as much cited in academic texts. Due to the re-organisation of the DCU website, they have been inaccessible for an interval, but I am reposting them, because it is important that they be accessible for the historical record. I have merged them here as a single document. Jeremy Cronin in his office in the South African Parliament in January 2002. Photo by Helena Sheehan First Interview with Jeremy Cronin MP by Dr Helena Sheehan on 17 April 2001 at University of Cape Town HS: Jeremy, can you outline the basic trajectory of your intellectual development? How would you describe it? JC: It is undeveloped. HS: Well to the extent that any of us are developed … JC: Ok. Grew up in a middle class white English-speaking South African family. All of those things are significant in a South African context, not least for intellectual development. My father was a Catholic and that was also important from an intellectual developmental point of view. He died when I was 10 years old and we moved to very close to where we're sitting now in Rondebosch. I went to a Marist brothers school and I would guess that that was an early influence in terms of an interest in philosophy. A sort of intellectually serious, probably pretentiously serious, approach to things came at that stage when I was 13 or 14 from some extremely eccentric defrocked priests who were then teaching at the Marist brothers.
    [Show full text]
  • Consociational Theory, Northern Ireland's Conflict, and Its Agreement
    John McGarry and Brendan O’Leary1 Consociational Theory, Northern Ireland’s Conflict, and its Agreement. Part 1: What Consociationalists Can Learn from Northern Ireland I did not draw my principles from my prejudices, but from the nature of things.2 ‘What a wonderful place the world would be’, cry the devotees of each way of life, ‘if only everyone were like us’. We can now see the fallacy in this fre- quently expressed lament: it is only the presence in the world of people who are different from them that enables adherents of each way of life to be the way they are.3 CONSOCIATIONAL THEORY, DEVELOPED BY AREND LIJPHART AND other scholars, is one of the most influential theories in comparative political science. Its key contention is that divided territories, be they regions or states, with historically antagonistic ethnically, religiously or linguistically divided peoples, are effectively, prudently, and some- times optimally, governed according to consociational principles. Consociations can be both democratic and authoritarian,4 but 1 The authors thank the editors of Government and Opposition, and its two anony- mous referees, for their very helpful suggestions. McGarry thanks the Carnegie Corporation of New York for funding his research, O’Leary thanks the Lauder endowment, and both authors thank the United States Institute of Peace. 2 Charles de Secondat, Baron de Montesquieu, ‘Preface’, in Anne M. Cohler, Basia C. Miller and Harold S. Stone (eds), The Spirit of the Laws, Cambridge, Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 1989 (first publication, 1748), p. xliii. 3 Michael Thompson, Richard Ellis, Aaron Wildavsky, Cultural Theory, Boulder, CO, Westview Press, 1990, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Perceptions of Justice, Identity, and Political Processes of Forgiveness and Revenge in Early Post-Conflict Transitions
    Marcia Byrom Hartwell D.Phil. University of Oxford Queen Elizabeth House/ Refugee Studies Centre [email protected] Perceptions of Justice, Identity, and Political Processes of Forgiveness and Revenge in early Post-Conflict Transitions In recent years there has been increased discussion regarding the role of forgiveness in post-conflict reconciliation. The most common debate has focused on whether there can be “reconciliation without forgiveness and/or forgiveness without reconciliation”. (Cairns and Roe eds, 2003, 132) Revenge, if mentioned within this discussion, has often been treated as a separate issue and as the antithesis of forgiveness and reconciliation. Though work on deconstructing the relationship between forgiveness and revenge in post-conflict transitions is still in the earliest stages, it has become increasingly clear from fieldwork interviews, conducted between 1999 to 2002 in Northern Ireland, Serbia, and South Africa, as well as observation and relevant research, that they appear to share similar phases or stages within an evolutionary process that can result in vastly different outcomes. In this analysis, reconciliation is viewed as both a short and long term process. In the short term, it is seen as a pragmatic cooperation between former enemies in rebuilding political, economic, and social institutions; in the long term, it is a process that encompasses multiple generations. During both, but most dramatically during the earliest phases, political actions and reactions are strongly influenced by an interaction between perceptions of justice interpreted in terms of fair or unfair treatment; formation of a victim/perpetrator identity; and personal and political processes of forgiveness and revenge.
    [Show full text]
  • Interdependence and Transition: the Cases Of
    DIE SUID- AFRIKAANSE , INSTITUUT VAN INTERNASIONALE AANGELEENTHEDE Jan Smuts Professor vir Intemasionale Verhoudings Intreerede INTERDEPENDENCE AND TRANSITION: Jan Smuts Professor for International THE CASES OF Relations Inaugural Lecture SOUTH AFRICA AND NORTHERN inij SOUTH IRELAND AFRICAN INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS ADRIAN GUELKE PROF ADRIAN GUELKE is a South African born and bred and an M.A. graduate of the University of Cape Town. Before returning to South Africa in 1992 to take up his appointment as Jan Smuts Professor of International Relations at the University of the Witwatersrand, he was Reader in Political Science at Queen's University in Belfast. He has written and spoken widely on the problems of Northern Ireland whilst in Britain. This Special Occasional Paper is published to commemorate Professor Guelke's Inaugural Lecture as Jan Smuts Professor, delivered by him in the Dorothy Susskind Auditorium at the University on 28 July 1993. // should be noted that any opinions expressed in this publication are the responsibility of the author and not of the Institute, INTERDEPENDENCE AND TRANSITION: THE CASES OF SOUTH AFRICA AND NORTHERN IRELAND ADRIAN GUELKE ISBN: 1-874890-24-2 SEPTEMBER 1993 The South African Institute of International Affairs Jan Smuts House P.O. Box 31596, Braamfontein Johannesburg, 2017 South Africa Deputy Vice-Chancellor, Dean, Professor Lodge, fellow students of International Relations, colleagues, friends, ladies and gentlemen, the theme of my lecture this evening is connections: connections between
    [Show full text]
  • Azevedo, Mario J. Roots of Violence: a History of War in Chad
    Document généré le 27 sept. 2021 04:46 Journal of Conflict Studies Azevedo, Mario J. Roots of Violence: A History of War in Chad. Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach Publishers, 1998. Thomas P. Ofcansky Volume 20, numéro 2, fall 2000 URI : https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/jcs20_2br02 Aller au sommaire du numéro Éditeur(s) The University of New Brunswick ISSN 1198-8614 (imprimé) 1715-5673 (numérique) Découvrir la revue Citer ce compte rendu Ofcansky, T. P. (2000). Compte rendu de [Azevedo, Mario J. Roots of Violence: A History of War in Chad. Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach Publishers, 1998.] Journal of Conflict Studies, 20(2), 150–150. All rights reserved © Centre for Conflict Studies, UNB, 2000 Ce document est protégé par la loi sur le droit d’auteur. L’utilisation des services d’Érudit (y compris la reproduction) est assujettie à sa politique d’utilisation que vous pouvez consulter en ligne. https://apropos.erudit.org/fr/usagers/politique-dutilisation/ Cet article est diffusé et préservé par Érudit. Érudit est un consortium interuniversitaire sans but lucratif composé de l’Université de Montréal, l’Université Laval et l’Université du Québec à Montréal. Il a pour mission la promotion et la valorisation de la recherche. https://www.erudit.org/fr/ Guelke, Adrian. South Africa in Transition: The Misunderstood Miracle War. London: I.B. Tarus Publishers, 1999. In a mocking vein of self-deprecating humor, Adrian Guelke, noted that "Political scientists make poor prophets . We are much better at providing explanations of events after they have occurred. In fact we are quite good at converting impossibilities into inevitabilities." (p.
    [Show full text]
  • Brief 22 Burying the Hatchet the Decommissioning of Paramilitary Arms in Northern Ireland Brief 22
    brief 22 Burying the Hatchet The Decommissioning of Paramilitary Arms in Northern Ireland brief 22 Contents The authors Kris Brown works in the Northern Preface 4 Ireland Political Collection of the Linen Hall Library, Belfast. He Zusammenfassung studied politics at Queen’s University German summary 6 Belfast, gaining his doctorate in 2000. His main research interests are the Part 1: The History of the Decommissioning Debate 8 Northern Ireland peace process, and Irish foreign policy. Of Arms and the Men: Origin and Initial Development of the Issue 10 Corinna Hauswedell is a historian Institutionalisation of Decommissioning, 1996–1998: and works as a project leader for From the Mitchell Principles to the Agreement 22 post-conflict peace-building at BICC. Guns and Government, 1999–2000: Disarmament and She is currently in charge of a case Difficulties in Implementing the Agreement 34 study of the Northern Ireland peace process and the role of From Crisis to the Rubicon? 2000–2001 42 demilitarisation. She also lectures on Irish history at Mannheim University. Part 2: Small Arms–Bigger Issues 48 The Time Had Come: Burying the Hatchet 50 The “Twin Track” Approach of the Agreement— “Fudging” the Arms 54 Matters of Trust: External and Internal Involvement for Disarmament 58 Proliferation of Violence and the Momentum of Arms 63 Conclusions 68 Glossary 73 Editing: Moira Davidson-Seger and References 74 Mark Sedra Cover photo: Republican mural in Barcroft Park, Newry, Co. Down (December 2000). Jonathan McCormick This publication was partially funded by the Volkswagen Foundation. 2 B·I·C·C brief 22 Burying the Hatchet The Decommissioning of Paramilitary Arms in Northern Ireland Corinna Hauswedell and Kris Brown B·I·C·C 3 brief 22 Preface the leadership of Sinn Fein—publicly declared that the organisation had urying the hatchet may become the particular emphasis on the role of the begun to put its arms permanently and Bmost tangible symbol that the war domestic and international actors verifiably beyond use, and by doing so, is over.
    [Show full text]
  • Uct Reflects on the Last 100 Years
    2018 ALUMNIALUM NEWS UCT REFLECTS ON THE LAST 100 YEARS A CENTURY OF REMEMBERING SHAWCO: 75 YEARS LEADERS 1968 OF GIVING BACK MISSION UCT aspires to become a premier academic meeting point between South Africa, the rest of Africa and the world. Taking advantage of expanding global networks and our distinct vantage point in Africa, we are committed, through innovative research and scholarship, to grapple with the key issues of our natural and social worlds. We aim to produce graduates whose qualifications are internationally recognised and locally applicable, underpinned by values of engaged citizenship and social justice. UCT will promote diversity and transformation within our institution and beyond, including growing the next generation of academics. UCT STRATEGIC PLAN 2020 VISION Our vision for UCT is to be an inclusive, engaged and research-intensive African university. UCT will inspire creativity through outstanding achievements in discovery and innovation. It will be celebrated for the quality of its learning and contribution to citizenship. We will enhance the lives of students and staff and will advance a more equitable and sustainable social order. We aspire to be a leader in the global Higher Education landscape. OUR STATEMENT OF VALUES • We embrace our African identity. • We widen educational and social opportunities. • We enhance the lives of individuals and communities. • We build an equitable social order based on respect for human rights. • We advance the public good by teaching, generating knowledge and actively engaging with the key challenges facing our society. CREATING A UNIVERSITY CULTURE THAT IS creative rigorous curious research-informed nurturing honest accountable excellent collegial responsible open inclusive respectful open-minded A NEW, INCLUSIVE IDENTITY FOR UCT We want a student and staff body that is more representative of the country and the continent, and for students and staff to see themselves – their cultures, values, heritage and knowledge systems – reflected at the university.
    [Show full text]
  • Azevedo, Mario J. Roots of Violence: a History of War in Chad
    Document generated on 09/26/2021 12:06 p.m. Journal of Conflict Studies Azevedo, Mario J. Roots of Violence: A History of War in Chad. Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach Publishers, 1998. Richard Dale Volume 20, Number 2, Fall 2000 URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/jcs20_2br03 See table of contents Publisher(s) The University of New Brunswick ISSN 1198-8614 (print) 1715-5673 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this review Dale, R. (2000). Review of [Azevedo, Mario J. Roots of Violence: A History of War in Chad. Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach Publishers, 1998.] Journal of Conflict Studies, 20(2), 151–152. All rights reserved © Centre for Conflict Studies, UNB, 2000 This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit. Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal, Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal. Its mission is to promote and disseminate research. https://www.erudit.org/en/ Guelke, Adrian. South Africa in Transition: The Misunderstood Miracle War. London: I.B. Tarus Publishers, 1999. In a mocking vein of self-deprecating humor, Adrian Guelke, noted that "Political scientists make poor prophets . We are much better at providing explanations of events after they have occurred. In fact we are quite good at converting impossibilities into inevitabilities." (p. 23) Formerly Jan Smuts Professor of International Relations at the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg from 1993 to 1995, Guelke is currently director of the Center for the Study of Ethnic Conflict at Queen's University in Belfast, Northern Ireland.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson Drawing from Negotiated Transitions in Northern Ireland and South Africa
    Lesson Drawing from Negotiated Transitions in Northern Ireland and South Africa Dr. Helen Brocklehurst (INCORE), Noel Stott (CSVR), Brandon Hamber (CSVR) and Gillian Robinson (INCORE) Prepared for delivery at the 2000 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriot Wardman Park, August 31 – September 3, 2000. Copyright by the American Political Science Association. 1 Abstract The paper, based on initial findings from a current research project1 provides a cursory assessment and mapping out of lesson drawing during the negotiated transitions from political violence in Northern Ireland and South Africa. Data is drawn from analyses of two parallel areas of policy development in each jurisdiction. In Nor thern Ireland the focus is on the Independent Review of Policing as well as Victim policy. The South African foci are the Truth and Reconciliation Commissions’ (TRC) Committee on Reparations and Rehabilitation of Victims, and the National Crime Prevention Strategy (NCPS). We begin with an overview of comparative analysis on these two countries. We look at factors which have made these countries significantly comparable from the perspective of analysts and practitioners. We suggest that Northern Ireland and South Africa have functional similarities, (such as commissions) and similar policy needs, and show how they have generated networks of actors and key individuals who are, and have been, engaged in lesson drawing from abroad. Using more detailed evidenc e drawn from a range of actors involved in policy development in these areas, and particularly exchanges between these two countries, we outline reasons and in particular motivations behind lesson drawing. We assess these practices in the context of current interpretations of public policy making and lesson drawing and draw upon understandings of such processes from policy makers themselves.
    [Show full text]