DOCSLIB.ORG

Subject Land Application Public Notification

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Subject Land Application Public Notification SOMERSET REGIONAL COUNCIL - OFFICER'S REPORT To: Bob Holmes, Acting Chief Executive Officer From: Ryan Cheng, Planning Officer Director: PeterTabulo, Directorof Planning and Development Date: 6 November 2019 Subject: DevelopmentApplication No 18654 - Application for a Development Permit for a Material Change of Use for Multiple dwelling (4 units) File No: DA18654 Action Officer: PO-RC Assessment No: 80301-00000-000 1.0 APPLICATION SUMMARY Subject Land Location 16 William Street, Kilcoy Real Property Description Lot 1 on RP76451 Area 0.135 hectare Current land use Residential Dwelling house Commercial- Two - offices/shops Somerset Region Planning SchemeVersion Three Zone Centre Shaping SEQ: SEQ Regional Plan 2017 Land Use Category Urban Footprint Application Proposed development Multiple dwelling (4 units) Level of Assessment Code Applicant/s Anthony Wheatley Applicants contact details c/- Fluid Building Approvals BO Box 404 ASPLEY QLD 4034 Date application received 30 May 2019 Date properly made 18 June 2019 Referral Agencies Departmentof State Development, Manufacturing, Infrastructureand Planning for the followingtrigger: Schedule 10, Part 9, Division 4, Subdivision 2, Table 4, Item 1 State transportcorridors and future State transport-corridors Public Notification Not required RECOMMENDED DECISiON Approve the Development Application No. DA18654 subject to the requirements and conditions contained in the Schedules and Attachments -118- Locahty Plan of Lot 1 on RP76451 S tuated at 16 Wilham Street, Kilcoy 2.0 PROPOSAL The applicant proposes to establish a Multiple dwelling use on-site. The Multiple dwelling use consists of four individual units. The site is currently improved by three existing buildings, a Dwelling house and two Shops/Offices. These buildings will be retained on-site at their current respective locations. The applicant has proposed to lift the existing Dwelling house convert it into two individual independent units, with one unit on the ground levet and the second unit on the first level Two additional single storey units will be constructed at the rear region of the site. All proposed units will have an overall height not exceeding two storeys and 8.5m above ground level. All units will be provided with individual private open spaces. The overall site cover is less than 40% of the site, with a density of 1 unit per 355m2 of the site. The proposed developmenthas a proposed rear boundary setback of 2m (from the rearmost unit), a proposed western side boundary setback of 2.85m (from the units converted from the Dwelling house), a proposed eastern side boundary setback of 5.5m and a proposed front boundary setback of 22.65m. It is noted that the existing Shops/Officesbuildings are currently constructed to the front boundary and to the eastern and western side boundaries. The applicant has not proposed any building works to the Shops/Offices buildings and do not form part of the development application. A 2m landscape garden space will be provided around the perimeter of the site where not occupied by existing and proposed buildings, crossover or private open spaces. A total of 13 carparking spaces have been proposed to be provided on-site. The existing access will be widened from 3m to 5.5m to accommodate the proposed use in accordance with Council's Design Standards. The developmentwill use the existing access at the William Street service road The proposed site, floor and elevation plans are provided at Attachments 1, 2, 3 and 4. 3.0 SITE DETAILS AND SURROUNDING LAND USES The subject site is regular in shape, with boundaries defined by William Street's service road to the south and other properties to the remaining directions. The subject site is not known to be inundated by flood and is not known to be prone to be slip, subsidence or erosion. Existing -119 surround land uses are predominately residential and commercial uses. The site is located in the Kilcoy commercial centre. The subject site has an area of 1,340m2 and a road frontage width of 20.117m 4.0 STATE ASSESSMENT This application is made under the provisions of the PlanningAct 2016. As such it is subject to the requirements of the Act, other relevant Acts, the Planning Regulation 2017, the State Planning Policy, and the South-East Queensland Regional Plan. 4.1 State Planning Policy The State Planning Policy (SPP) has been updated since the Somerset Region Planning Scheme came into effect. As such, assessment against the SPP is required, however, the relevant componentsof the SPP had not been altered since the planning scheme came into effect. 4.2 Vegetation Management Act 1999 As per the Depadment of State Development, Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning's DevelopmentAssessment Mapping System, the proposed development footprint does not contain regulated vegetation requiring further referral. 4.3 Environmental Protection Act 1994 The site is not listed on the Contaminated Land Register or the Environmental Management Register. 4.4 Planning Regulation 2017 The development apphcation triggered referral to the Department of State Development, Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning due to the development application is for a Material change of use and located within 25m of a State-controlled road corridor, being William Street. The State has reviewed the application and responded with conditions. 5.0 COUNCIL ASSESSMENT An assessment againstthe relevant parts of the Planning Scheme is set out below. 5.1 Strategic Framework An assessment against the Strategic Framework was not required as the proposed developmentis not an impact assessable development. 5.2 Code ComplianceSummary Applicable Code Compliancewith Performance Outcomes Overall Outcomes Centre zone code Yes Alternativesolution provided for PO2 Multiple dwelling and dual Yes Afternative solutions provided occupancy code for PO11, PO12, PO13 and PO22 Services, works and Yes Complies infrastructurecode Transport, access and parking No Alternativesolutions provided code for PO5 Centre zone code Perförmanceoutcomes Examples Building setbacks PO2 AO2.1 120- Building setbacks: New buildings and structures are built to the primary street frontage boundary of the (a) contribute to the establishment of a site, including the following main streets: continuous 'main street' character; (b) assist in the provision of active Centre Main street/s frontages and the engagement of development with the public realm; Esk Ipswich Street (c) facilitatethe establishment of Fernvale Brisbane Valley Hwy awnings on main streets; Main Street (d) do not detract from the amenity of Kilcoy Hope Street adjoining premises, in terms of Mary Street privacy, access to natural light, and William Street ventilation; and Lowood Main Street (e) provide for the efficient use of the Railway Street site. Toogooiawah Cressbrook Street A02.2 Where an adjoiningpremises is located in the General residential zone, buildings and structuresare setback a minimum 3 metres from the common side boundary. AO2.3 New buildings and structuresare setback a minimum 3 metres from the rear boundary. Performanceoutcome assessment The applicant has proposed to establish a four units multiple dwelling on-site. Two units will be converted from the existing Dwell1ng house and the two additional units will be constructed to the rear region of the site. All units will be away from the front boundary of the site. The two existing Shop/Office buildings will be retained on the front boundary of the site. The applicant has not proposed any alteration to the façade of these structures. The development will therefore not alter the existing streetscape appearance of the site. The rear adjoining premises to the subject site is identified as General residential zone. The proposed rearmost unit will be setback 2m from the rear boundary of the site. A condition requiring the installation of dividing fence will maintain the existing amenity of the rear adjoining premises. The development is not expected to intrude on the privacy, access to natural light and ventilation of the existing residential use to the north. Multiple dwelling and dual occupancy code Performanceoutcomes | Examples Setbacks PO11 A011.1 Building setbacks: Buildings incorporate the following setbacks: (a) assist is providing landscaping opportunities; (a) minimum clearance from a road (b) protect the amenity of residents and frontage of 6 metres; adjoining premises; (b) minimum clearance from the rear (c) provide space between adjoining boundary of 3 metres; and premises; (c) minimum clearance from side (d) ensure that development is not boundaries of: overbearing;and (e) contribute to a consistent (i) 1.5 metres for a building not streetscapecharacter. exceeding 4.5 metres in -121- height; and (ii) 2 metres plus 0.5 metres for every additional 3 metres or part thereof over 4.5 metres for buildings of a height in excess of 4.5 metres. Performanceoutcome assessment The existing buildings constructed to the front boundary will be retained and therefore existing front boundary setback remains unchanged. The existing streetscape character is maintainedand preserved. The Multi dwelling developmenthas the following proposed setbacks: ? A rear boundary setback of 2m; ? A western side boundary setback of 2.85m; ? A eastern side boundary setback of 5.5m: and ? A front boundary setback of 22.65m. It is noted the two existing Shop/Office buildings are currently constructed to the front, eastern and western side boundaries.These two buildings do not form part of the development application. The development will be required to install landscaped garden space and a 1.8m high boundary fence around the perimeter of the site, where not obstructed by buildings or vehicle crossover. It is considered the development will not affect the amenity of residents and adjoining premises. The developmentis also not considered as overbearing as the proposed rear units will be single storey and the existing Dweliing house has been retained. Open space PO12 AO12.1 Landscaped open space contributes to an A minimum of 15 percent of the site area is 'open'appearancethatenhancesthe provided as landscaped open space with a streetscape character of the locality and minimum width of 2 metres.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Manual of Operational Procedures for Flood Mitigation at Wivenhoe Dam and Somerset Dam 1 the Controlled Version of This Document Is Registered
    Wivenhoe Dam and Somerset Dam Manual of Operational Procedures for Flood Mitigation Revision 15 | November 2019 15 Revision No. Date Amendment Details 0 27 October 1968 Original issue. 1 6 October 1992 Complete revision and re-issue. 2 13 November 1997 Complete revision and re-issue. 3 24 August 1998 Change to page 23. 4 6 September 2002 Complete revision and re-issue. 5 4 October 2004 Complete revision. 6 20 December 2004 Miscellaneous amendments and re-issue. 7 November 2009 (approved by Gazette notice Complete revision. 22 January 2010) 8 September 2011 Revision but no substantive alteration of objectives, strategies or operating practices. 9 November 2011 Insertion of Section 8 and consequential amendments. 10 October 2012 Revision but no substantive alteration of objectives, strategies or operating practices. 11 November 2013 Revision to take account of changes to the Act and improve clarity, but no substantive alteration of objectives or strategies. Operating practices amended to exclude consideration of Twin Bridges and Savages Crossing following stakeholder input. 12 November 2014 Significant revision including changes from WSDOS investigations, legislative changes and a number of general improvements. 13 November 2015 A number of minor updates to improve readability and application. 14 November 2016 Changes to account for the revised Maximum Flood Storage Level for Somerset Dam and a number of general improvements. 15 November 2019 Revision Revision No: 15 – November 2019 Seqwater Doc No: MAN-0051 Manual of Operational Procedures for Flood Mitigation at Wivenhoe Dam and Somerset Dam 1 The controlled version of this document is registered. All other versions including printed versions are uncontrolled.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of Ordinary Meeting Held Wednesday 10 October 2018 Held
    Minutes of Ordinary Meeting Held Wednesday 10 October 2018 Held in the Simeon Lord Room Library / Museum Building Redbank Street, Esk Present Cr G D Lehmann (Mayor) Cr D Hall (Deputy Mayor) Cr H Brieschke (Councillor) Cr S Choat (Councillor) Cr C Gaedtke (Councillor) Cr M Ogg (Councillor) Cr B Whalley (Councillor) Mr G Smith (Acting CEO / Director Finance) Mr M McGoldrick (Director Corporate and Community Services) Mr A Johnson (Director Operations) Mr P Tabulo (Director Planning and Development) Mrs K Jones (Director HR and Customer Service) Mrs S Pitkin (Minute Secretary) Ms M Maeseele (Communications and Marketing Manager) Minutes of Ordinary Meeting 10 October 2018 C O N T E N T S Meetings authorised by Council .............. 123 2018 Somerset Christmas Light Competition - Judges ............................................... 114 Natural Resource Management Monthly Report - September 2018 ........................ 6 Acquisition of valueless land in Fairney View ............................................................... 93 Opening of Meeting ..................................... 3 Adjournment of meeting .......................... 105 Operational Report - September 2018 .... 108 ATTACHMENT 1 ......................................... 1 Pest Animal and Animal Weed Symposium Brisbane Valley Rail Trail (BVRT) – Linville – 20 – 23 May 2019 ............................. 124 Station .................................................. 104 Planning and Building Services Monthly Building Better Regions Funding – Report – September 2018.......................
    [Show full text]
  • Somerset Regional Council Local Disaster Management Plan
    Somerset Regional Council Local Disaster Management Plan CONTROLLED COPY No._____ Somerset Regional Council Local Disaster Management Plan Part 1 Main Plan and Annexes 1 Preliminaries Version 2.00 Aug 09 Somerset Regional Council Local Disaster Management Plan Somerset Regional Council Local Disaster Management Plan 1. Preliminaries P1.01 Foreword from Chair of Somerset Regional Council Local Disaster Management Group Somerset Regional is a dynamic area of the Brisbane Valley in South East Queensland which is experiencing moderate growth and despite its idyllic lifestyle the area is occasionally subjected to the impact of disasters both natural and non-natural. The Shire has a wide range of topography, changing demographics and diversified industries; therefore there is a need for a dynamic and robust Local Disaster Management Plan. This local disaster management plan, prepared by the Somerset Regional Local Disaster Management Group under the authority of the Disaster Management Act 2003, forms the basis and guidelines for the Prevention, Preparedness, Response and Recovery activities of the joint agencies within the Somerset Regional Council area, when responding to a disaster that has impacted or has the potential to seriously impact upon the Shire’s communities and its infrastructure. Threat specific plans for the most likely threats such as flooding and emergency animal/plant disease have been developed along with supporting Operational Functional Plans. The plan is a dynamic document that will be kept up to date to match changes in legislation and reflect lessons learnt from natural disasters elsewhere in the State. Whilst as a community we may not be able to prevent disaster from occurring, we can through planning, prepare our community and enhance its resilience to the adverse impact of any threat.
    [Show full text]
  • Somersetregional Council
    SOMERSETREGIONAL COUNCIL- Officer'sReport To: Andrew Johnson, Chief ExecutiveOfficer From: Matthew McGoldrick, DirectorCorporate and Community Services Director: Matthew McGoldrick, DirectorCorporate and Community Services Date: 12 October 2020 Subject: Corporate Services Monthly Report September2020 File Ref: - Information management - reporting - Corporate Service Report Action Officer: DCORP Background/Summary In delivering on Council's Operational Plan and commitment to excellent customer service, the Corporate Services Department offer the following information as a representation of activities undertaken during the month of September2020, CommunityDevelopment Network and Other Meetings Promoted RUOK Day (10 September) in association with RHealth (mental health ? Brisbane Valley Interagency navigators)with bannersand electronic signs in (host) the five towns and with the distribution of ? Kilcoy Interagency (host) posters and/orcup-cake flags to 47 businesses ? Inter-Counciland Services Forum throughout the region. The initiative was well (host) received by the businesses,who supported the ? Ipswich and District Seniors promotion. Network Meeting ? Moreton Bay Elder Abuse Program Network ? Kilcoy High School Support Meeting ? LGAO Domestic and Family Violence Network meeting ? Ipswich and West Moreton Local Level Alliance Meeting ? Queensland Families and Communities Association's Drought Strategy Release ? Met with representatives from Coast and Country Bus Lines ? Met with new Youth in Charge Alcohol and Other Drugs Worker ? Attended
    [Show full text]
  • 115 Education
    Education The first schools in the Brisbane Valley were the Meanwhile harvesting, milking, and transporting private ones in slab huts with shingle roofs for the the crop to the railhead took precedence over children on Cressbrook and Colinton stations. regular attendances.I Otherwise schools in the region have been predominantly one-teacher schools to serve A typical day for a young school child early this country children of immigrant selectors. Most of century involved milking in the morning, walking female them began as Provisional Schools with or riding to school, classes all day, return home to head The Brisbane Valley had teachers. the milk or feed the calves. Children of timbergetters distinction female of having the youngest ever and sawmill hands seldom saw their fathers except Watt in teacher in charge, Joy at Louisavale 1936. for weekends for they went to work often at three in in With the change government education policy in the morning to be there by daybreak. Other late decline in the 1950s and the the dairy industry children lived in the timber camps and travelled the one teacher schools rapidly closed and bussing long distances to school. Tiny children walked to became first in the norm. The school bus ran 1946 school through the dark, towering forest ringing to from Mt Stanley to Linville. High Schools and the sounds of swinging axes and bullockies Secondary Departments were opened in the early persuading their teams onward with loud chants. 1960s bringing greater opportunities for education Some sat on the back of slides, or German to country areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Esk Shire Council the Water Fond Currently Runs at a Loss and the General Fond Has to Susidise the Water Fond
    SUPPLEMENTARY SUBMISSION NO. 133 Your reference Our reference S002186 When callinbg ask for TRober» i t, BaT» m• 17 February 2003 House of Representatives Standing Committee on Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry Parliament House CANBERRA ACT 2600 Dear Sir/Madam, Re: Submission on Inquiry into Future Water Supplies for Australian Rural Industries Communities As previously stated the Esk Shire is situated on the north western edge of Brisbane and contains an area of 3946 square kilometres. However the population of the shire is only about 14,500 people and these are scattered over most of the shire. The shire is 125 kilometres long (running north/south) and 70 kilometres wide. There are several small towns in the shire and these are difficult to service with town water as they are also scattered across the shire. The main towns and community centres are as follows:- » Esk with a population of approximately 1,000 people; « Fernvale with a population of approximately 1,100 people; • Lowood with a population of approximately 1,050 people; • Toogoolawah with a population of approximately 950 people; • Minden Tarampa area with a population of approximately 1,200 people; • Somerset Dam Township with a population of approximately 150 people; • Linville with a population of approximately 60 people. The above towns are served with a treated town water supply except for Linville which is supplied with chlorinated groundwater. Other Esk Shire towns not served with a treated water supply are: « Coominya with a population of approximately 550 people; • Wivenhoe Pocket with a population of approximately 400 people; • Moore area with a population of approximately 200 people; • Glamorgan Vale with a population of approximately 60 people; and • Harlin with a population of approximately 50 people.
    [Show full text]
  • Brisbane River Catchment Flood Study
    Coominya ! ! 2 Wivenhoe Tailwater ( Lake Wivenhoe Outflow ! Lockyer Creek ) ) Atkinsons Dam Wivenhoe Pocket 5 Savages Crossing r ( e iv R e n a b 1 Tarampa is r ( B Fernvale Lowood Mount Tarampa 4 Lowood Pump Station ( 3 Lyons Bridge ( Morton Vale Glamorgan Vale ) ) Gauging Station Study Partners 0 - 0.5 Hydraulic Assessment ( 0.5 - 1 Brisbane City Council Reporting Location Ipswich City Council BMT WBM endeavours to ensure that the information provided in this 1 - 1.5 map is correct at the time of publication. BMT WBM does not warrant, 0 1.5 3 4.5 Extreme Flood Lockyer Valley Regional Council guarantee or make representations regarding the currency and accuracy of information contained in this map. ° (notional 1 in 100,000 AEP) 1.5 - 2 Somerset Regional Council Kilometers >2 Seqwater Limit of Detailed Modelling Map Grid of Australia 1994, Zone 56 www.bmtwbm.com.au Refer to Councils for local flooding beyond limit Filepath : B:\B20702 BRCFS Hydraulics\60_Mapping\MXD\MXD_OUTPUT\MR7\D0100\MR7-Map-07.mxd ) Wivenhoe Pocket ! ! 5 Savages Crossing r ( e ! iv R e n a b is r B Fernvale Lowood 4 Lowood Pump Station ( ) ) Glamorgan Vale Kholo 6 Upstream Mt Crosby Weir ( 7 Downstream Mt Crosby Weir Pine Mountain ( Anstead Karana Downs Ironbark Brisba ne River ) Bellbowrie ) Moggill Bre 25 Warrego Hwy mer River ( ( ( ( ) Gauging Station Study Partners 0 - 0.5 Hydraulic Assessment ( 0.5 - 1 Brisbane City Council Reporting Location Ipswich City Council BMT WBM endeavours to ensure that the information provided in this 1 - 1.5 map is correct at the time of publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of Ordinary Meeting Held Wednesday, 26 August 2020 Held in the Simeon Lord Room Library / Museum Building Redbank Stree
    Minutes of Ordinary Meeting Held Wednesday, 26 August 2020 Held in the Simeon Lord Room Library / Museum Building Redbank Street, Esk Present Cr Graeme Lehmann (Mayor) Cr Helen Brieschke (Deputy Mayor) Cr Sean Choat (Councillor) Cr Cheryl Gaedtke (Councillor) Cr Kylee Isidro (Councillor) Cr Jason Wendt (Councillor) Mr A Johnson (Chief Executive Officer) Mr M McGoldrick (Director Corporate and Community Services) Mr C Young (Director Operations) Mr L Hannan (Director Planning and Development) Mr G Smith (Director Finance) Mrs K Jones (Director HR and Customer Service) Mrs S Pitkin (Minute Secretary / Executive Assistant) Ms M Maeseele (Communications and Marketing Manager) Apologies Cr Bob Whalley (Councillor) Minutes of Ordinary Meeting 26 August 2020 C O N T E N T S Amalgamating freehold lots – Kilcoy Final draft of Brisbane Valley Rail Trail depot and kindergarten ......................... 14 Strategic Plan .................................... 31 Application of Hold Annual Lifecycle Cycling Classic – Sunday 13 September Items for reports for future meetings ..... 48 2020 .................................................. 33 Kilcoy racecourse trackside seating Business arising out of minutes of proposed shade structures ................ 15 previous meeting ................................. 3 Leave of Absence ................................... 3 CCTV monitoring options ...................... 16 Closure of Meeting ................................ 48 Matters of Public Interest ........................ 3 Commercial Lease – Railway St Lowood
    [Show full text]
  • Submission to the State Development, Infrastructure And
    Submission to the State Development, Infrastructure and Industry Committee Inquiry “Queensland Audit Office Report to Parliament 14 for 2012- 13: Maintenance of water infrastructure assets” School of Civil & Environmental Engineering Date: 18 October, 2013. Author: Dr Stuart Khan Address: School of Civil Environmental Engineering, University of New South Wales. Phone: (02) 93855070 Email: [email protected] Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 BACKGROUND 3 INTRODUCTION 4 CURRENT OPERATIONAL STRATEGY FOR THE WCRWS 5 PROPOSED OPERATIONAL STRATEGY FOR THE WCRWS 7 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED OPERATIONAL STRATEGY 7 ADVANTAGES OF PROPOSED OPERATIONAL STRATEGY 7 IMPROVED AND PROTECTED RAW WATER QUALITY FOR THE MT CROSBY WATER TREATMENT PLANT 7 DIVERSIFICATION OF SOURCE WATER OPTIONS FOR THE MT CROSBY WATER TREATMENT PLANT 9 REDUCED WATER PUMPING REQUIREMENTS 9 AN OPPORTUNITY TO INCREASE FLOOD MITIGATION CAPACITY 9 DIRECT POTABLE REUSE (DPR) 11 WHAT IS DIRECT POTABLE REUSE (DPR)? 11 FINDINGS BY THE ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING (ATSE) 12 CONCLUDING COMMENTS 14 REFERENCES 15 Executive Summary This document is presented as a public submission to the State Development, Infrastructure and Industry Committee of the Queensland Parliament Legislative Assembly inquiry into the issued contained in the Queensland Audit Office Report to Parliament 14 for 2012-13: Maintenance of water infrastructure assets. The focus of this submission is the configuration and operation of the Western Corridor Recycled Water Scheme in relation to the operation of Lake Wivenhoe as the major water supply reservoir for South East Queensland. This submission specifically addresses key aspects of the Inquiry Terms of Reference including: “innovative strategies to increase revenue from manufactured water infrastructure assets” and “the future public value of the assets including consideration of the impact on the community, economy and environment”.
    [Show full text]
  • NANANGO NANANGO 0 10 20 Km
    Electoral Act 1992 N 2017 QUEENSLAND STATE ELECTORAL DISTRICT OF Boundary of Electoral District Local Government Area NANANGO NANANGO 0 10 20 km MARYBOROUGH Gympie Regional Council boundary CALLIDE South Burnett Regional Council boundary Woolooga locality boundary Lot 1 L371017 Grongah BURNETT NP Lot 648 LX2014 Lot 101 L371353 Woolooga locality boundary Tansey Windera GYMPIE REGIONAL COUNCIL H GYMPIE W B Kilkivan a Y r a m b a Cloyna Proston h Boondooma Lake Cinnabar Boondooma Oakview locality boundary Goomeri C r Kinbombi Black Snake locality boundary Brigooda e e Murgon k Wrattens Forest locality boundary Cherbourg SOUTH BURNETT REGIONAL COUNCIL Wondai Wrattens CHERBOURG NP Wilkesdale ABORIGINAL K Durong South Tingoora IL C SHIRE COUNCIL O Y Bo Lake Manumbar yn Wooroolin e Barambah Wattle Creek Manumbar locality boundary Chahpingah Gordonbrook Memerambi Elgin Vale M U Kingaham R R ive Kingaroy Brisbane Range r G O Booie N B r South Burnett i s Y b Regional Council boundary HW a R er NANANGO n D v e Ri Jimna Goodger Nanango BUNYA Monsildale t Ellesmere Conondale tuar S Tarong NP Bunya Mountains Yarraman Maidenwell R GLASS NP i v D e 'A Blackbutt r GU HOUSE Upper IL SOMERSET Yarraman AR REGIONAL COUNCIL HWY Kilcoy B u C R ree I m k S E TOOWOOMBA B Toowoomba Regional Council boundary Lake A REGIONAL COUNCIL N Somerset E Somerset Regional Anduramba Toogoolawah Council boundary Emu Creek Malling locality boundary WARREGO Maclagan locality boundary The Bluff Narko locality boundary Bryden Esk V A L L Highgrove locality boundary E PINE Y RIVERS Coalbank locality boundary Mount Dundas Hallen Lake Wivenhoe Emu Creek locality boundary Buaraba Coominya HW Y Jones Gully locality boundary From Lot 23 SL370 to Mountain Camp locality boundary Loc Somerset Regional ky k Lot 3 RP5284 CONDAMINE er C Council boundary Pierces Creek locality boundary Wivenhoe Pocket locality boundary Brisbane River Anduramba locality boundary LOCKYER The Bluff locality boundary Cressbrook Creek locality boundary © Electoral Commission Queensland 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Drinking Water Quality Management Plan Report
    DRINKING WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN REPORT 2019/20 DRINKING WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN REPORT ENRICH QUALITY OF LIFE 1 DRINKING WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN REPORT 2 DRINKING WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN REPORT OUR PURPOSE Enrich quality of life. OUR VISION We play a valued role in enhancing the liveability of our communities. OUR VALUES Participation Activate. Collaborate. Accelerate. Customers and Community Listen. Understand. Respond. Accountability See it. Own it. Solve it. Safety Everyone. Everywhere. Every day. Deliver Value Define it. Create it. Deliver it. Creativity Initiate. Create. Inspire. 3 DRINKING WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN REPORT WELCOME We are pleased to present Urban Utilities’ Drinking TELL US WHAT YOU THINK ABOUT THIS Water Quality Management Plan Report for 2019/20. REPORT The report showcases our operational performance Visit us at our Head Office: with respect to drinking water quality and shows Level 2, 15 Green Square Close how we have been implementing key improvement Fortitude Valley QLD 4006 actions detailed in our Drinking Water Quality (Monday to Friday 8.00am – 5.00pm) Management Plan (DWQMP). Phone us on: This report informs the Department of Natural 13 26 57 (8am – 6pm weekdays) Resources, Mines and Energy (the Regulator) on how we complied with our DWQMP and its approval Email us at: conditions. It also allows us to meet our compliance [email protected] obligations under the Water Supply (Safety and ISSN: 1838-5575 Reliability) Act 2008. © Urban Utilities 2020 This report also provides our customers with information about the quality of their drinking water. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT READERSHIP We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of The report is intended to provide important the lands on which we operate and recognise information to a broad range of stakeholders their continuing connection to the land, including our customers, current and future waters and community.
    [Show full text]
  • Queensland Floods Commission of Enquiry ‘2011 Brisbane Floods – a Geography Lesson’
    Private Submission (Newton) Queensland Floods Commission of Enquiry ‘2011 Brisbane Floods – A Geography Lesson’ Introduction This is a private submission. Its scope is limited to the January 2011 floods that affected Brisbane, Ipswich, Toowoomba, and the Lockyer Valley. I have no qualifications in weather science or hydrology. While I do not have the status of a professional or an expert in that field, I also have no preconceived notions about it. That is in fact why I decided to write to you. I believe that input from ordinary citizens such as I can give a dynamic balance to your process. You will have access to many professional opinions from experts in the disciplines relevant to your enquiry’s Terms of Reference, and quite rightly their professional opinions will have considerable weight and influence. However, there is an increasing tendency to rely on computer ‘modelling’ to back up professional opinions. These models are designed to test scenarios involving multiple variables and they are useful. However, they are only as good as the facts and assumptions that underpin them. Their disadvantage, and hidden danger, is that they are abstract, and they can create blind spots whereby simple facts fail to be considered. I was also motivated to write this submission by some reports that appeared in the print and electronic media after the floods in Brisbane. The floods had barely receded before they started the ‘blame game’, with some turning their sights on the operators of Wivenhoe Dam. These reports generally lacked objectivity and balance and the result is that many ordinary people to whom I talk actually believe that the Brisbane floods were caused by water released from Wivenhoe Dam.
    [Show full text]