Airport Diagram Airport Diagram

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Airport Diagram Airport Diagram 20086 WATERBURY-OXFORD (OXC) AIRPORT DIAGRAM AL-5785 (FAA) OXFORD, CONNECTICUT ATIS 132.975 OXFORD TOWER 118.475 GND CON 121.65 FIELD CLNC DEL ELEV 121.65 730 135.1 (When Tower Closed) 18 NORTHEAST RAMP B D HANGAR C C 184 D . 1 ° B HANGARS 41°29.0'N E E A B NORTHWEST RAMP GENERAL AVIATION PARKING HANGARS TRANSIENT PARKING 5801 NE-1, 09 SEP 2021 to 07 OCT B X TWR/BCN 100 G G HANGARS HANGAR SOUTH RAMP GENERAL AVIATION PARKING 41°28.5'N NE-1, 09 SEP 2021 to 07 OCT A 0 . 004 ILS HOLD 9 % U . 1 P ° H VA R 13 . 3 ° A W 36 ELEV RWY 18-36 680 S-50, D-85, 2S-107, 2D-145 JANUARY 2020 EMAS ANNUAL RATE OF CHANGE 0.1° E CAUTION: BE ALERT TO RUNWAY CROSSING CLEARANCES. READBACK OF ALL RUNWAY HOLDING INSTRUCTIONS IS REQUIRED. 41°28.0'N 73°08.5'W 73°08.0'W 73°07.5'W OXFORD, CONNECTICUT AIRPORT DIAGRAM WATERBURY-OXFORD (OXC) 20086 OXFORD, CONNECTICUT AL-5785 (FAA) 20086 LOC/DME I-OXC APP CRS Rwy Idg 5301 109.55 TDZE 721 ILS or LOC RWY 36 005 ° Chan32(Y) Apt Elev 730 WATERBURY-OXFORD (OXC) DME required. MISSED APPROACH: Climb to 3000 on T heading 005° and MAD VOR/DME R-317 3 to ZATMI INT/MAD 24.9 DME and hold. A NA Rwy 36 helicopter visibility reduction below 4 SM NA. Continue climb-in-hold to 3000. ATIS NEW YORK APP CON OXFORD TOWER GND CON CLNC DEL UNICOM 132.975 124.075 343.65 118.475 (CTAF)L 121.65 121.65 122.95 R BD 25 A N R S M -3 M 1 137 7 2800 ° 3 1 ° 7 ° 270 ZATMI ° 939 1694 090 MAD 24.9 1900 905 1005 LOCALIZER 109.55 I-OXC 798 Chan 32 (Y) HUMOM 110 I-OXC 2.8 .4 NE-1, 09 SEP 2021 to 07 OCT C M h AD 1549 an M 4 A 1 D DAAVY I-OXC 6.5 R - 009 Procedure NA for arrival 2500 005 on BDR VOR/DME ( 6 109 airway radials 336 CW 077. 1 ° ) ALTERNATE (IF) C . IAF h 55 MISSED CUTMA a BRIDGEPORT n I-OXC 12.6 APCH FIX 32 I- 185 108.8 BDR OX (GPS REQ) ( Y Chan 25 C ° ) 185 DAAVY NE-1, 09 SEP 2021 to 07 OCT 005 I-OXC 6.5 ° ELEV 730 D TDZE 721 18 ° ° ) 3 . 2500 7 R 023 ( - 185 P 3000 ZATMI MAD DAAVY CUTMA TWR 5801 R-317 I-OXC 6.5 I-OXC 12.6 hdg 005° X 100 LOC only. * HUMOM 2500 I-OXC 2.8 I-OXC * 005° 2500 2.2 0 . 9 2500 % U GS 3.00° P * P 1220 GS unusable below TCH 56 965 MSL. 1.3 NM 0.5 NM 3.7 NM 6.1 NM 36 005° 5.5 NM CATEGORY A B C D from FAF 3 3 S-ILS 36 971- 4 250 (300- 4 ) 1 1 S-LOC 36 1140-1 419 (500-1) 1140-18 419 (500-1 8 ) REIL Rwy 36 L 3 1 1380-14 1460-2 4 L C CIRCLING 1300-1 570 (600-1) 3 1 HIRL Rwy 18-36 650 (700-1 4 ) 730 (800-2 4 ) OXFORD, CONNECTICUT WATERBURY-OXFORD (OXC) Amdt 15 03JAN19 41°29'N-73°08'W ILS or LOC RWY 36 OXFORD, CONNECTICUT AL-5785 (FAA) 20030 WAAS Rwy Idg APP CRS 5801 CH 42901 TDZE 730 RNAV (GPS) RWY 18 185° W18A Apt Elev 730 WATERBURY-OXFORD (OXC) RNP APCH. MISSED APPROACH: Climb to 3 T Rwy 18 helicopter visibility reduction below 4 SM NA. 2500 direct CUTMA and hold. A For uncompensated Baro-VNAV systems, LNAV/VNAV NA below -16°C or above 54°C. ATIS NEW YORK APP CON OXFORD TOWER GND CON CLNC DEL UNICOM 132.975 124.075 343.65 118.475 (CTAF) L 121.65 121.65 122.95 Procedure NA for arrival PAWLING on PWL VOR/DME airway PWL radials 055 CW 216. HOLD 6000 3000 2032 4 NM 185 3000 (IF/IAF) (IAF) 137 ° BISCO WEXNO oPT ( ° N 15 005 3000 ° ) 270 .5) ° (6 NoPT 3000 095° (IAF) 6.8) 18 2200 ( ( MOONI 5 . 5 5 ) ° NE-1, 09 SEP 2021 to 07 OCT Procedure NA for arrivals at MOONI on V58-167 westbound, V34 northwest (FAF) bound and V91-487 northbound. ARQEB GICEN 2.6 NM to RW18 25 939 1694 A N S M RW18 M 980 905 3100 RW18 1005 MISSED APCH FIX CUTMA 1549 185 NE-1, 09 SEP 2021 to 07 OCT ° 005 ELEV 730 D TDZE 730 4 NM ° 185° to 2500 CUTMA RW18 18 4 NM Holding Pattern WEXNO ARQEB P GICEN 2.6 NM to 005° *LNAV only 6000 2200 RW18 3000 185 185° ° *1.5 NM to RW18 TWR 5801 RW18 X GP 3.00° 2200 100 TCH 47 *1580 5.5 NM 1.9 NM 1.1 NM 1.5 NM CATEGORY A B C D 0 1 . 1 9 LPV DA 410 (500-1 8 ) 1140-1 8 % U P P LNAV/ 1 1 DA 1141-1 411 (500-1 8 ) VNAV 8 3 3 LNAV MDA 1240-1 510 (600-1) 1240-1 8 510 (600-1 8 ) 36 3 1 REIL Rwy 36 L 1380-1 4 1460-2 4 C CIRCLING 570 (600-1) L 1300-1 3 1 HIRL Rwy 18-36 650 (700-1 4 ) 730 (800-2 4 ) OXFORD, CONNECTICUT WATERBURY-OXFORD (OXC) Amdt 3 03JAN19 41°29'N-73°08'W RNAV (GPS) RWY 18 OXFORD, CONNECTICUT AL-5785 (FAA) 20030 WAAS Rwy Idg APP CRS 5301 CH 72922 TDZE 721 RNAV (GPS) RWY 36 005° W36A Apt Elev 730 WATERBURY-OXFORD (OXC) RNP APCH. MISSED APPROACH: Climb to 3 T Rwy 36 helicopter visibility reduction below 4 SM NA. 3000 direct ZATMI and hold, continue climb-in-hold to 3000. A For uncompensated Baro-VNAV systems, LNAV/VNAV NA below -16°C or above 54°C. ATIS NEW YORK APP CON OXFORD TOWER GND CON CLNC DEL UNICOM 132.975 124.075 343.65 118.475 (CTAF)L 121.65 121.65 122.95 Procedure NA for arrivals at ZATMI on V34 northwest bound. ZATMI 2500 to CUTMA 090° 185° (16.1) 270° 939 1694 4 NM 1005 905 RW36 859 HUMOM 1.8 NM to 1549 RW36 NE-1, 09 SEP 2021 to 07 OCT (FAF) DAAVY 0 2500 ( 0 W3625 6 R N . 5 A 1 S M ° M ) 3100 (IF/IAF) CUTMA 185 2500 N oPT ° 298 (IAF) ° 005 ( MUVGE 9.4) ° NE-1, 09 SEP 2021 to 07 OCT T 4 NM P o 6000 ELEV D TDZE ° 730 721 ) N HOLD 3 . 2500 7 025 ( 18 (IAF) 2500 Procedure NA for arrival on BDR BRIDGEPORT VOR/DME airway radials 336 CW 054. BDR P 3000 ZATMI *LNAV only 4 NM HUMOM DAAVY CUTMA Holding Pattern 1.8 NM to 2500 RW36 TWR 5801 *1.2 NM 185° 6000 to RW36 005° X 005° 2500 100 RW36 2500 *1300 GP 3.00° TCH 56 1.2 0.6 NM 3.7 NM 6.1 NM 0 . 9 CATEGORY A B C D % U 3 3 P P LPV DA 971- 4 250 (300- 4 ) LNAV/ DA 1097-1 376 (400-1) 005° to VNAV RW36 36 1 1 LNAV MDA 1120-1 399 (400-1) 1120-1 8 399 (400-1 8 ) REIL Rwy 36 L 3 1 1380-1 4 1460-2 4 C CIRCLING 570 (600-1) HIRL Rwy 18-36 L 1300-1 3 1 650 (700-1 4 ) 730 (800-2 4 ) OXFORD, CONNECTICUT WATERBURY-OXFORD (OXC) Amdt 3 03JAN19 41°29'N-73°08'W RNAV (GPS) RWY 36 M1 A ALTERNATE MINS A 21252 INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURE CHARTS A IFR ALTERNATE AIRPORT MINIMUMS Standard alternate minimums for non-precision approaches and approaches with vertical guidance [NDB, VOR, LOC, TACAN, LDA, SDF, VOR/DME, ASR, RNAV (GPS) or RNAV (RNP)] are 800-2. Standard alternate minimums for precision approaches (ILS, PAR, or GLS) are 600-2. Airports within this geographical area that require alternate minimums other than standard or alternate minimums with restrictions are listed below. NA - means alternate minimums are not authorized due to unmonitored facility, absence of weather reporting service, or lack of adequate navigation coverage. Civil pilots see FAR 91. IFR Alternate Minimums: Ceiling and Visibility Minimums not applicable to USA/USN/USAF. Pilots must review the IFR Alternate Minimums Notes for alternate airfield suitability. NAME ALTERNATE MINIMUMS NAME ALTERNATE MINIMUMS AUBURN/LEWISTON, ME BEDFORD, MA AUBURN/LEWISTON LAURENCE G HANSCOM MUNI (LEW).…………………...ILS or LOC Rwy 41 FLD (BED)…..………....……..ILS or LOC Rwy 1112 2 12 RNAV (GPS) Rwy 4 ILS or LOC Rwy 29 RNAV (GPS) Rwy 223 RNAV (GPS) Rwy 2334 1ILS, Categories A, B, 800-2; Category C, 800-2½; RNAV (GPS) Z Rwy 1134 Category D, 900-2¾; LOC, NA. RNAV (GPS) Z Rwy 293 2Category C, 800-2¼; Category D, 900-2¾; 1NA when control tower closed. 3NA when local weather not available. 2LOC, Category C, 800-2¼; Category D, 800-2½. 3Category C, 800-2¼; Category D, 800-2½. 09 SEP 2021 to 07 OCT AUGUSTA, ME 4NA when local weather not available. AUGUSTA STATE (AUG).…................…..ILS or LOC Rwy 171 BERLIN, NH RNAV (GPS) Rwy 82 BERLIN RNAV (GPS) Rwy 172 RGNL (BML).…................…..RNAV (GPS) Rwy 18 RNAV (GPS) Rwy 353 Category A, 1100-2; Category B, 1200-2; VOR Rwy 352 Category C, 1500-3; Category D, 1600-3.
Recommended publications
  • Groton-New London Airport (GON)
    DECEMBER 2017 FINAL Environmental Assessment (EA) & Environmental Impact Evaluation (EIE) for Obstruction Removal Groton-New London Airport (GON) Prepared for: Prepared by: FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (EA) FOR OBSTRUCTION REMOVAL GROTON‐NEW LONDON AIRPORT (GON) FAA AIP NO. 3‐09‐0900‐010‐2014 CAA CONTRACT NO. 2014‐02 CHA CONTRACT NO. 29067 June 2017 Prepared for: Connecticut Airport Authority (CAA) Prepared BY: CHA Consulting, Inc. Groton‐New London Airport (GON) Obstruction Analysis ‐Tree Removal FEDERAL FINDING After careful and thorough consideration of the facts contained herein, the undersigned finds that the proposed federal action is consistent with existing national policies and objectives as set forth in Section 101 of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and other applicable environmental requirements and will not significantly affect the quality of the human environment or otherwise include any condition requiring consultation pursuant to Section 101 (2) (c) of the NEPA. Approved: 6/9/17 Richard Doucette Date Manager, Environmental Programs RECORD OF DECISION ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT EVALUATION (EIE) FOR OBSTRUCTION REMOVAL GROTON‐NEW LONDON AIRPORT (GON) FAA AIP NO. 3‐09‐0900‐010‐2014 CAA CONTRACT NO. 2014‐02 CHA CONTRACT NO. 29067 December 2017 Prepared for: Connecticut Airport Authority (CAA) Prepared BY: CHA Consulting, Inc. Notice: On November 11, 2017, the State of Connecticut, Office of Policy and Management (OPM) determined that the Connecticut Airport Authority (CAA) “shall not be construed to be a department, institution or agency of the state”, and that the Connecticut Environmental Policy Act (CEPA) is not applicable to CAA actions. See CT OPM notice included in Appendix B.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ ES1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Business Plan Process .................................................................................................. 2 1.2 Airport Profile .............................................................................................................. 3 2.0 EXISTING AIRPORT CHARACTERISTICS............................................................................ 5 2.1 Physical Characteristics ............................................................................................... 5 2.2 Existing Airport Tenants .............................................................................................. 6 2.3 Management Structure ............................................................................................... 7 2.4 Historical Airport Data ................................................................................................. 8 2.5 Baseline Financial Data ................................................................................................ 9 3.0 AIRPORT MARKET AREA .............................................................................................. 11 4.0 SWOT ANALYSIS FOR WATERBURY-OXFORD AIRPORT ................................................. 15 4.1 SWOT Components ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents Section 1
    PLAN OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT 2017– 2027 GRISWOLD, CONNECTICUT PLAN OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT 2017 - 2027 Town of Griswold, Connecticut Borough of Jewett City, Connecticut Plan Contents Introduction History and Population Demographics Inventory and Analysis Goals and Recommendations Implementation Conclusion Consistency with State Plan of Conservation and Development Plan Maintenance and Amendments This plan was adopted at a legally convened meeting of the Griswold Planning and Zoning Commission Adoption Date 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1. INTRODUCTION 1.A INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.B STATUTORY AUTHORITY & CONTENT ....................................................................................... 1 1.C PLAN PHILOSOPHY..................................................................................................................... 2 SECTION 2. HISTORY AND POPULATION DEMOGRAPHICS 2.A HISTORY OF GRISWOLD ............................................................................................................. 3 2.B POPULATION TRENDS ................................................................................................................ 5 SECTION 3. INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS 3.A TRANSPORTATION ................................................................................................................... 11 3.B HOUSING ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • BDL Brochure.Pdf
    The Connecticut Airport Authority The Connecticut Airport Authority (CAA) was established as a quasi-public agency in 2011 to own, improve, and operate Bradley International Airport and the five state-owned general aviation airports (Danielson, Groton-New London, Hartford-Brainard, Waterbury-Oxford, and Windham). The CAA strives to provide excellent customer service and top-quality facilities for its passengers while making Connecticut’s airports more attractive to new airlines, establishing new routes, and supporting Connecticut’s overall economic development and growth strategy. The CAA’s five general aviation airports are also crucial components of the state’s overall transportation system, providing access to corporate aircraft, local pilots, and convenient charter service for regional businesses. Already, the CAA has achieved numerous milestones, including the addition of new Bradley service to Dublin (Ireland), Los Angeles, Pittsburgh, Fort Myers, Houston, Tampa and Washington, D.C. The Airports: Bradley International Airport Bradley International Airport (BDL) is a civil/military airport in Windsor Locks, Connecticut. Owned and operated by the Connecticut Airport Authority, it is the second-largest airport in New England. The airport is about halfway between Hartford and Springfield. It is Connecticut's busiest commercial airport with 93,461 operations for the calendar year ending 2015 and enplanements of 1,465,147 as of June, 2016. Airlines operating at Bradley International Airport include Aer Lingus, Air Canada, American Airlines, Delta, JetBlue, OneJet, Southwest, and United. As a dual-use military facility with the U.S. Air Force, the airport is also home to the 103rd Airlift Wing (103 AW) of the Connecticut Air National Guard.
    [Show full text]
  • Windham Airport (IJD)
    DECEMBER 2017 FINAL Environmental Assessment (EA) & Environmental Impact Evaluation (EIE) for Obstruction Removal Windham Airport (IJD) Prepared for: Prepared by: FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (EA) FOR OBSTRUCTION REMOVAL WINDHAM AIRPORT (IJD) FAA AIP NO. 3‐09‐0900‐010‐2014 CAA CONTRACT NO. 2014‐02 CHA CONTRACT NO. 29067 March 2017 Prepared for: Connecticut Airport Authority (CAA) Prepared BY: CHA Consulting, Inc. Windham Municipal Airport (IJD) Obstruction Analysis ‐Tree Removal FEDERAL FINDING After careful and thorough consideration of the facts contained herein, the undersigned finds that the proposed federal action is consistent with existing national policies and objectives as set forth in Section 101 of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and other applicable environmental requirements and will not significantly affect the quality of the human environment or otherwise include any condition requiring consultation pursuant to Section 101 (2) (c) of the NEPA. Approved: 2/23/17 Richard Doucette Date Manager, Environmental Programs RECORD OF DECISION ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT EVALUATION (EIE) FOR OBSTRUCTION REMOVAL WINDHAM AIRPORT (IJD) FAA AIP NO. 3‐09‐0900‐010‐2014 CAA CONTRACT NO. 2014‐02 CHA CONTRACT NO. 29067 December 2017 Prepared for: Connecticut Airport Authority (CAA) Prepared BY: CHA Consulting, Inc. Notice: On November 11, 2017, the State of Connecticut, Office of Policy and Management (OPM) determined that the Connecticut Airport Authority (CAA) “shall not be construed to be a department, institution or agency of the state”, and that the Connecticut Environmental Policy Act (CEPA) is not applicable to CAA actions. See CT OPM notice included in Appendix B. As such, environmental review for the project is not subject to CEPA, and this ROD (prepared prior to November 2017) is not applicable.
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Diagram Airport Diagram
    20310 LAWRENCE MUNI(LWM) AIRPORT DIAGRAM AL-654 (FAA) LAWRENCE, MASSACHUSETTS ATIS 42°43.5' N 126.75 LAWRENCE TOWER 119.25 GND CON 124.3 71°07.5' W 71°07.0' W CLNC DEL VA 124.3 R 126.15 (When Tower Closed) 14 . 5 ° W ELEV JANUARY 2020 134 ANNUAL RATE OF CHANGE 23 ELEV 0.1° E ° 122 .7 14 136 232 . E 2° 0. 7% U P D F A NE-1, 07 OCT 2021 to 04 NOV 3654 X 100 E HS 1 E D E 42°43.0' N 316 .2 HS 2 ° A C 32 NE-1, 07 OCT 2021 to 04 NOV HS 3 FIELD 0 D ELEV 10 148 X 5001 TWR 233 A B RWY 05-23 ° A S-45, D-62, 2D-110 7 . RWY 14-32 052 S-30, D-34, 2D-53 ELEV 135 5 CAUTION: BE ALERT TO RUNWAY CROSSING CLEARANCES. READBACK OF ALL RUNWAY HOLDING INSTRUCTIONS IS REQUIRED. AIRPORT DIAGRAM LAWRENCE, MASSACHUSETTS 20310 LAWRENCE MUNI(LWM) NE-1, 07 OCT 2021 to 04 NOV 2021 NOV 04 to 2021 OCT 07 NE-1, LAWRENCE ONEDEPARTURE LAWRENCE ONEDEPARTURE (LWM1.LWM) (LWM1.LWM) LBSTA ATIS 126.75 TOP ALTITUDE: N42° ' 48.00 CLNC DEL 124.3 2000 W 70°36.81' 126.15 (when twr closed) HANAA HYLND N42°46.85' L-33, GND CON 124.3 ° LAW RENCE TOW ER CAMBRIDGE W 71°16.52' H-11-12 31 119.25 (CTAF) 115.0 CAM C L-33, H-11-12 28 053 MA GLYDE 1100 BOSTON DEP CON Chan 97 N42°16.06' 124.4 279.6 REVSS R 048 21168 17JUN21 N42°59.66'-W 73°20.64' - - N42°20.73' 350 R W 71°48.71' L-32 , H-11 KENNEBUNK -34 -12 L-33-34 W 71°48.62' SYRACUSE 117.1 ENE E L-33-34, EN 117.0 SYRS Chan 118 RY H-10-11-12 Chan 117 R-285 '-W 70 N43°25.54 °36.81' '-W 76 37 N43°09.63 .27' °12 R-114 L-32, H-11-12 FRILL ' L-32, H-11-12 R-278 N42°13.79 51 -273 40 W 69°49.48' R-104 37 R DUNKK H-11-12 N42°04.90' CELTK BOS 35 BOSTON
    [Show full text]
  • Killingly & Its Villages Vol
    PRSRT STD POSTAL U.S. POSTAGE PAID CUSTOMER PERMIT #231 ECR WSS SOUTHBRIDGE, MA 01550 Mailed to every home in Brooklyn, the borough of Danielson, Killingly & its villages Vol. II, No. 17 Complimentary (860) 928-1818/email:[email protected] ‘If you don't risk anything you risk even more.’ Friday, April 4, 2008 School Brooklyn Selectmen reopen library issue sion to go to referendum was based Association has pledged to raise budget WILL GO TO APRIL 10 REFERENDUM on the fact that the board was pro- $200,000. vided with more accurate financial The new library would be 15,000 BY JOSH SAYLES zens. figures. square feet, seven-and-a-half times VILLAGER STAFF WRITER First Selectman Roger Engle said “We just wanted to get the truth- larger than the current building. It BROOKLYN — The Board of the change of heart came because ful numbers and not paint a rosy would contain updated technology discussion the board “wanted to determine Selectmen decided to send the picture,” he said. “We didn’t want and a number of community issue of a new Brooklyn public our own destiny.” Brooklyn only the cost to end up double what rooms, as well as more space for library to referendum at a special needed 20 signatures to call a town everyone accepted.” books. meeting March 26. Members ini- meeting and 200 to send it to refer- To build the library, Brooklyn The referendum will be from 6 continues tially chose not to move the project endum; given the contentiousness will have to obtain a $5.7 million a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Danielson Airport Business Plan
    AIRPORT BUSINESS PLAN Danielson Airport Prepared for: Business Plan Executive Summary Prepared by: May 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ ES1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Business Plan Process .................................................................................................. 2 1.2 Airport Profile .............................................................................................................. 3 2.0 EXISTING AIRPORT CHARACTERISTICS............................................................................ 5 2.1 Physical Characteristics ............................................................................................... 5 2.2 Existing Airport Tenants .............................................................................................. 5 2.3 Management Structure ............................................................................................... 6 2.4 Historical Airport Data ................................................................................................. 7 2.5 Baseline Financial Data ................................................................................................ 8 3.0 AIRPORT MARKET AREA ................................................................................................ 9 4.0 SWOT ANALYSIS FOR DANIELSON AIRPORT ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • STATE of CONNECTICUT an 2018(3) Annual List of Distributors
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT AN 2018(3) DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE SERVICES 450 Columbus Blvd Ste 1 Hartford CT 06103-1837 ANNOUNCEMENT Annual List of Distributors For Motor Vehicle Fuels Tax Purposes Purpose: This Announcement identifies persons since the current annual list and any subsequent licensed as motor fuels distributors by the Department quarterly list(s) were published. The Announcement is of Revenue Service (DRS) as of January 1, 2018. then posted on the DRS website. Because quarterly lists are not cumulative, it is necessary to consult the current annual list, any subsequent quarterly list(s), and Background: The motor vehicle fuels tax is not the current quarterly list to determine whether a person payable on motor vehicle fuel sold to any licensed is a licensed distributor. distributor other than a tax-paid motor vehicle fuels distributor. On or around January 31 of each year, DRS publishes as an Announcement an annual list of licensed Effective Date: This Announcement is effective upon distributors and posts the Announcement on its website issuance. at www.ct.gov/DRS. DRS updates the annual list on a quarterly basis on or around April 30, July 31, and October 31 of each year by publishing as an Statutory Authority: Conn. Gen. Stat. §12-458(a)(1). Announcement a quarterly list identifying the persons that have become, or are no longer, licensed distributors Table of Contents Special Fuel Distributors .............................................................................................................. Page 2 Tax Paid Motor
    [Show full text]
  • Danielson Airport (LZD)
    DECEMBER 2017 FINAL Environmental Assessment (EA) & Environmental Impact Evaluation (EIE) for Obstruction Removal Danielson Airport (LZD) Prepared for: Prepared by: FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (EA) FOR OBSTRUCTION REMOVAL DANIELSON AIRPORT (LZD) FAA AIP NO. 3‐09‐0900‐010‐2014 CAA CONTRACT NO. 2014‐02 CHA CONTRACT NO. 29067 May 2017 Prepared for: Connecticut Airport Authority (CAA) Prepared BY: CHA Consulting, Inc. Danielson Airport (LZD) Obstruction Analysis ‐Tree Removal FEDERAL FINDING After careful and thorough consideration of the facts contained herein, the undersigned finds that the proposed federal action is consistent with existing national policies and objectives as set forth in Section 101 of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and other applicable environmental requirements and will not significantly affect the quality of the human environment or otherwise include any condition requiring consultation pursuant to Section 101 (2) (c) of the NEPA. Approved: 5/17/2017 Richard Doucette Date Manager, Environmental Programs RECORD OF DECISION ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT EVALUATION (EIE) FOR OBSTRUCTION REMOVAL DANIELSON AIRPORT (LZD) FAA AIP NO. 3‐09‐0900‐010‐2014 CAA CONTRACT NO. 2014‐02 CHA CONTRACT NO. 29067 December 2017 Prepared for: Connecticut Airport Authority (CAA) Prepared BY: CHA Consulting, Inc. Notice: On November 11, 2017, the State of Connecticut, Office of Policy and Management (OPM) determined that the Connecticut Airport Authority (CAA) “shall not be construed to be a department, institution or agency of the state”, and that the Connecticut Environmental Policy Act (CEPA) is not applicable to CAA actions. See CT OPM notice included in Appendix B. As such, environmental review for the project is not subject to CEPA, and this ROD (prepared prior to November 2017) is not applicable.
    [Show full text]
  • Simsbury Fly-In Prog 07
    SUPPORTING SPONSOR SUPPORTING SPONSOR 26TH ANNUAL SIIMMSSBBUURRYY FFLLYY--IINN S PRESENTED BY Sunday, September 18, 2011 8 am-3 pm Simsbury Airport 4B9 Simsbury, Connecticut Rain date Sunday, September 25 TThhee LL laanndd!! aarrggeesstt EEvveenntt ooff iittss KKiinndd iinn NNeeww EEnnggl SimsburyAirport.com PLATINUM SPONSORS DEALERSHIPS Avon & Torrington BDL TO RALEIGH-DURHAM. IT’S A SLAM DUNK. NONSTOP - DAILY OPERATED BY DELTA CONNECTION® CARRIERS, PINNACLE AND COMAIR EAA Chapter 324 Offers Many Activities at Simsbury Airport By Mark Ranstead, President EAA Chapter 324 Simsbury he Experimental Aircraft Association Chapter 324 EAA Sponsors Young Eagles Program TSimsbury is proud to be a participant in the 2011 The EAA sponsors many education programs Simsbury Fly-In. EAA Chapter 324 including the Young Eagles program . The program was Simsbury is a local community of launched in 1992 to give interested young people, ages aviation enthusiasts; one of more 8–17, an opportunity to go flying in a general aviation than a thousand such groups airplane. These flights take place at the local level and throughout the world. Chapters are are offered free of charge ; made possible through the a unique and important element of generosity of EAA member volunteers. Through this the EAA. They are the focal point program, Chapter 324 Simsbury has the opportunity to where members have the ability to introduce the joy of flying to any local youth with an interact and participate and also serve as a platform for interest in aviation. This summer we have held two EAA programs at the local level. Young Eagle events and given 27 Young Eagles rides.
    [Show full text]
  • Killingly Planning and Zoning Commission
    Killingly Planning and Zoning Commission Keith Thurlow, Chair Virge Lorents, Vice-chair Brian Card, Secretary Joseph Couture John Larkin Mark Horvath, Alternate Sarah Nathans, Alternate Plan of Conservation and Development Advisory Committee Joyce Ricci, Chairperson – Town Council Keith Thurlow, Vice-chair – Planning and Zoning Commission Donna Bronwell, Craig Goff: Conservation Commission Rosemarie Lee, Mark Tillinghast: Economic Development Commission Robert F. Leonard, Jr, Virge Lorents: Planning and Zoning Commission Brad Gauthier, Robert Loiselle: Town Council Consultant: John Filchak, Director, NECCOG Town Staff Bruce Benway, Town Manager Kimberly Darigan Newman, Assistant Town Manager Linda Walden, Director of Planning and Development Elsie Bisset, Economic Development Coordinator Eric Rumsey, Planner 1 Town of Killingly, Plan of Conservation and Development: 2010 – 2020 Section One Introduction This Plan of Conservation and Development is the principal statement of policy for the Town. It provides a broad context or blueprint for decision making that fosters a healthy environment, a thriving economy, and a high quality of life for all residents. It balances population, housing, and employment growth with habitat preservation, agriculture, open space, and infrastructure needs. It presents a vision for the Town's future, and a series of recommendations and/or strategies for achieving that vision. The intent of the Plan is to guide the Town's efforts in land use planning and growth management, the At least once every ten provision of public facilities and services, environmental protection, economic development and years, the [Planning] land conservation. The “goal” of this Plan is to provide commission shall prepare Killingly with a comprehensive, understandable, and usable blueprint to guide future decisions.
    [Show full text]