DOCSLIB.ORG

Hoyle Tanner Qualifications

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hoyle Tanner Qualifications & hoyletanner.com March 10, 2021 Mr. James A. Wheeler City Manager Berlin Regional Airport c/o City Hall 168 Main Street Berlin, New Hampshire 03570 RE: Request for Qualifications Primary Engineer – Berlin Regional Airport Dear Mr. Wheeler, This letter and accompanying qualifications statement convey our firm’s sincere interest in being considered by the City of Berlin to serve as Berlin Regional Airport’s (BML) primary engineer. Your potential airport projects reflect an airport that is prepared to address airfield pavement maintenance, safety and security needs while also preparing for potential future growth opportunities with an apron expansion and fuel systems upgrades. We believe our Project Experience section illustrates Hoyle, Tanner’s proficiency with projects similar in nature to those presented in your proposed airport improvement project list. Additionally, our Firm’s Approach and Resources section outlines our approach to each element of the project cycle. Our firm is committed to the success of BML’s future projects and are dedicated to providing the professionals and resources necessary to complete airport projects we can all be proud of. Our trusted leadership team is available to guide you through the FAA and NHDOT process. Tim Audet, PE will serve as your Project Manager for all anticipated engineering projects. His extensive design experience coupled with his field capabilities allows him to provide comprehensive project designs that are focused on practical solutions aimed at constructability and long-term maintainability. He will also provide construction administration allowing for project continuity and efficiency. Nils Gonzalez, PE will oversee the QA/QC program during the design process and coordinate with Tim to confirm all services for your Airport are completed in a quality manner that meets your needs. Patrick Sharrow, AAE will provide airport planning services including your Master Plan Update as you chart the future of BML. As a former airport manager and an experienced pilot, Patrick offers an insider’s unique perspective to all your aviation planning efforts. Kimberly Peace will be responsible for the environmental reviews for all your projects and secure all needed permits allowing the project schedule to proceed unimpeded. Request for Qualifications – Berlin Regional Airport March 10, 2021 Page 2 Joining our team are specialty service experts chosen based on their ability to contribute the needed innovative solutions required to meet BML’s goals. They include York Land Services, LLC for field survey services and S.W. Cole Engineering, Inc. for geotechnical investigation and materials testing services. Hoyle, Tanner has teaming history and successful project track record with both of these firms. Additional speciality teaming parnters will be added as needed based on the project requirements. This may include one of several aviaiton fuel design experts that Hoyle, Tanner has partnered with on previous system installations/upgrades. Your proposed airport improvement projects reflect an airport that is prepared to look beyond just maintenance projects; it emphasizes a focus on the future, including creating a blueprint for BML’s long-term development with the preparation of a Master Plan Update and expanded revenue- generating opportunities with a fuel systems upgrade. The Hoyle, Tanner team I committed and immediately available to collaborate on these and all your goals for the Airport’s future. Sincerely, HOYLE, TANNER & ASSOCIATES, INC. Robert M. Furey, PE Senior Vice President/Director of Aviation Services [email protected] Cover Letter TABS Company Profile Project Team Key Personnel Organizational Chart Resumes Table Project Experience of Contents Teaming Partners Firm’s Approach & Resources Our Approach Our Resources References Insurance --------------------------------------------------------- Hoyle, Tanner & Associates, Inc. --------------------------------------------------------- C PR OMP OFILE ANY COMPANY PROFILE COMPANY PROFILE OUR VISION Since our founding in 1973, Hoyle, Tanner continually provides innovative, collaborative, and sustainable engineering and construction solutions for the challenges our clients face, while enhancing the communities in which we work and live. We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards while maintaining integrity and respect within our professional relationships. We continue to build a corporate culture that honors and values the individuality and strengths of our team members and our clients’ staff. OUR TEAM Hoyle, Tanner’s team of professional engineers, planners, technicians, and support staff provides municipal, state and federal clients with quality aviation, civil, structural, environmental, transportation engineering, and construction management services. We treat each and every project as unique regardless of its size, scope, or complexity. We emphasize the development of creative, cost-effective, results-oriented solutions to all planning and design projects. Our team continually strives to provide our clients with quality services delivered on-time and on-budget, resulting in successful projects. We encourage you to contact any of our clients who can attest to the quality of the services we provide. TECHNICAL AVIATION EXPERTISE Hoyle, Tanner is an industry leader in many areas of airport planning, design, permitting, and construction administration. We have highlighted the services below which we believe will be most applicable to you and your Airport as you proceed with your CIP. HOYLE, TANNER AVIATION EXPERTISE PLANNING & ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION ENVIRONMENTAL & MANAGEMENT PERMITTING Airport & Heliport Airfield Pavement Construction USACE Section 10, 401, Master Plan Studies Design Administration 404 Wetland Permitting Airport Layout & Stormwater Construction NEPA CATEX, EA, Terminal Area Studies Management & Erosion Observation Preparation Airspace Analysis Control Site Visits Public Meeting & Runway Length Airfield Signage, Field Testing Information Outreach Analysis Lighting & NAVAIDs Coordination & NHDES Alteration of LPV & Aeronautical Obstruction Removal & Review Terrain (AoT) Survey Studies Lighting Construction NHDES Wetlands Part 150 Noise Aircraft Fueling Systems Contract Documents Permitting Exposure Map Security/Wildlife Fences & Specifications New Hampshire Services Terminal & Public/ Preparation Division of Historical sUAS Drone Private Hangar Design Construction Safety Resources Review Operations ARFF/SRE/Maintenance Phasing Plan (NHDHR) Asset Management Building Change Order Vegetative Business/Strategic Access Roads & Auto Analysis & Management Planning Parking Processing Hydraulic Analysis of Land Acquisition & Fuel System Site Design Contractor Payment Rivers & Watersheds Easements Review (HEC-RAS & SMS/SRH- 2D) --------------------------------------------------------- Hoyle, Tanner & Associates, Inc. --------------------------------------------------------- COMPANY PROFILE CURRENT AVIATION CLIENTS Hoyle, Tanner currently has multi-year on-call aviation service contracts and/or ongoing projects with the following New England state agencies, airports and cities providing planning, engineering, and construction services. Those clients are listed below: Burlington International Airport Manchester–Boston William H. Morse State Airport Regional Airport Vermont Agency of Transportation which Portsmouth International owns and operates: Airport at Pease . Caledonia County Airport . Edward F. Knapp State Airport . Franklin County State Airport . Hartness State Airport Maine Department of . Middlebury State Airport Transportation which is . Morrisville-Stowe State Airport responsible for the Augusta . Northeast Kingdom International Airport State Airport and statewide . Rutland Southern Vermont Regional improvement projects for Airport Maine’s 32 airports Auburn-Lewiston Airport Brunswick Executive Airport Eastport Municipal Airport Connecticut Airport Authority (CAA) Lincoln Regional Airport which owns and operates: Millinocket Municipal Airport . Bradley International Airport Newton Field . Danielson Airport Pittsfield Municipal Airport . Groton-New London Airport Sugarloaf Regional Airport . Hartford-Brainard Airport . Waterbury-Oxford Airport . Windham Airport Massachusetts Port Authority Tweed New-Haven Regional Airport Danbury Municipal Airport which owns and operates: . L.G. Hanscom Field . Worcester Regional Airport Rhode Island Airport Corporation . Boston Logan (RIAC) owns and operates: International Airport Massachusetts Department of . TF Green International Airport Transportation Aeronautics . Block Island State Airport which is responsible for . Newport State Airport statewide improvement . North Central State Airport projects for the . Quonset State Airport Commonwealth’s 33 airports . Westerly State Airport --------------------------------------------------------- Hoyle, Tanner & Associates, Inc. --------------------------------------------------------- COMPANY PROFILE REGULATORY AUTHORITY EXPERIENCE Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Hoyle, Tanner has been planning and designing airport projects since 1973. We maintain a comprehensive understanding of FAA practices and regulations by attending FAA-sponsored training conferences and maintaining all current FAA Advisory Circulars. Our long-term relationship with FAA New England regional staff proves invaluable as we manage the big picture for each FAA-sponsored project. United States
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Groton-New London Airport (GON)
    DECEMBER 2017 FINAL Environmental Assessment (EA) & Environmental Impact Evaluation (EIE) for Obstruction Removal Groton-New London Airport (GON) Prepared for: Prepared by: FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (EA) FOR OBSTRUCTION REMOVAL GROTON‐NEW LONDON AIRPORT (GON) FAA AIP NO. 3‐09‐0900‐010‐2014 CAA CONTRACT NO. 2014‐02 CHA CONTRACT NO. 29067 June 2017 Prepared for: Connecticut Airport Authority (CAA) Prepared BY: CHA Consulting, Inc. Groton‐New London Airport (GON) Obstruction Analysis ‐Tree Removal FEDERAL FINDING After careful and thorough consideration of the facts contained herein, the undersigned finds that the proposed federal action is consistent with existing national policies and objectives as set forth in Section 101 of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and other applicable environmental requirements and will not significantly affect the quality of the human environment or otherwise include any condition requiring consultation pursuant to Section 101 (2) (c) of the NEPA. Approved: 6/9/17 Richard Doucette Date Manager, Environmental Programs RECORD OF DECISION ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT EVALUATION (EIE) FOR OBSTRUCTION REMOVAL GROTON‐NEW LONDON AIRPORT (GON) FAA AIP NO. 3‐09‐0900‐010‐2014 CAA CONTRACT NO. 2014‐02 CHA CONTRACT NO. 29067 December 2017 Prepared for: Connecticut Airport Authority (CAA) Prepared BY: CHA Consulting, Inc. Notice: On November 11, 2017, the State of Connecticut, Office of Policy and Management (OPM) determined that the Connecticut Airport Authority (CAA) “shall not be construed to be a department, institution or agency of the state”, and that the Connecticut Environmental Policy Act (CEPA) is not applicable to CAA actions. See CT OPM notice included in Appendix B.
    [Show full text]
  • (Asos) Implementation Plan
    AUTOMATED SURFACE OBSERVING SYSTEM (ASOS) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN VAISALA CEILOMETER - CL31 November 14, 2008 U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service / Office of Operational Systems/Observing Systems Branch National Weather Service / Office of Science and Technology/Development Branch Table of Contents Section Page Executive Summary............................................................................ iii 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................... 1 1.1 Background.......................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose................................................................................. 2 1.3 Scope.................................................................................... 2 1.4 Applicable Documents......................................................... 2 1.5 Points of Contact.................................................................. 4 2.0 Pre-Operational Implementation Activities ............................ 6 3.0 Operational Implementation Planning Activities ................... 6 3.1 Planning/Decision Activities ............................................... 7 3.2 Logistic Support Activities .................................................. 11 3.3 Configuration Management (CM) Activities....................... 12 3.4 Operational Support Activities ............................................ 12 4.0 Operational Implementation (OI) Activities .........................
    [Show full text]
  • I APPENDIX Page Tweed-New Haven Airport
    i APPENDIX Page Tweed-New Haven Airport Authority v. Tong, No. 17-3481-cv and No. 17-3918-cv, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, Judgment entered July 9, 2019 ................................................ 1a Tweed-New Haven Airport Authority v. Jepsen, Case No. 3.15cv01731 (RAR), U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut, Judgment entered October 3, 2017 ...................... 24a Tweed-New Haven Airport Authority v. Jepsen, Case No. 3.15cv01731 (RAR), U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut, Ruling on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss entered December 9, 2016 .................................................. 68a Tweed-New Haven Airport Authority Act, C.G.S.A. § 15-120g et seq. ...................................... 88a Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution, Article VI, Clause 2 ....................... 108a Connecticut Constitution, Article Tenth, § 1 ......... 108a Federal Aviation Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 40103 ............. 109a 14 C.F.R. § 139.1 ..................................................... 111a 1a 930 F.3d 65 United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. TWEED-NEW HAVEN AIRPORT AUTHORITY, Plaintiff-Appellant, City of New Haven, Intervenor Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William TONG, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Connecticut, Defendant-Appellee.* No. 17-3481-cv; 17-3918-cv | August Term 2018 | Argued: December 12, 2018; | Decided: July 9, 2019 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, No. 15 Civ. 1731 (RAR), Robert A. Richardson, Magistrate Judge, Presiding. Attorneys and Law Firms Hugh I. Manke, John C. King, Christopher A. Klepps, Updike, Kelly & Spellacy, P.C., Hartford, Ct., for plaintiff-appellant Tweed-New Haven Airport Authority. John Rose, Jr., Corporation Counsel, New Haven Office of the Corporation Counsel, New Haven, Ct., for intervenor plaintiff-appellant Tweed-New Haven Airport Authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ ES1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Business Plan Process .................................................................................................. 2 1.2 Airport Profile .............................................................................................................. 3 2.0 EXISTING AIRPORT CHARACTERISTICS............................................................................ 5 2.1 Physical Characteristics ............................................................................................... 5 2.2 Existing Airport Tenants .............................................................................................. 6 2.3 Management Structure ............................................................................................... 7 2.4 Historical Airport Data ................................................................................................. 8 2.5 Baseline Financial Data ................................................................................................ 9 3.0 AIRPORT MARKET AREA .............................................................................................. 11 4.0 SWOT ANALYSIS FOR WATERBURY-OXFORD AIRPORT ................................................. 15 4.1 SWOT Components ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ACRP 03-31 Bibliography Last Update: June 15, 2016
    ACRP 03-31 Bibliography Last Update: June 15, 2016 Contents Air Cargo ....................................................................................................................................................... 2 Air Service ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 Economic....................................................................................................................................................... 9 Environmental ............................................................................................................................................. 13 Finance ........................................................................................................................................................ 16 Land Use ..................................................................................................................................................... 18 Media Kit ..................................................................................................................................................... 19 Noise ........................................................................................................................................................... 21 Role of the Airport ....................................................................................................................................... 23 ACRP 03-31: Resources Bibliography Page
    [Show full text]
  • National Transportation Safety Board Aviation Accident Final Report
    National Transportation Safety Board Aviation Accident Final Report Location: West Gardiner, ME Accident Number: MIA08MA051 Date & Time: 02/01/2008, 1748 EST Registration: N102PT Aircraft: CESSNA 525 Aircraft Damage: Destroyed Defining Event: Loss of control in flight Injuries: 2 Fatal Flight Conducted Under: Part 91: General Aviation - Personal Analysis The instrument-rated private pilot departed on an instrument flight rules (IFR) cross-country flight plan in near-zero visibility with mist, light freezing rain, and moderate mixed and clear icing. After departure, and as the airplane entered a climbing right turn to a track of about 260 degrees, the pilot reported to air traffic control that she was at 1,000 feet, climbing to 10,000 feet. The flight remained on a track of about 260 degrees and continued to accelerate and climb for 38 seconds. The pilot then declared an emergency, stating that she had an attitude indicator failure. At that moment, radar data depicted the airplane at 3,500 feet and 267 knots. Thirteen seconds later, the pilot radioed she wasn't sure which way she was turning. The transmission ended abruptly. Radar data indicated that at the time the transmission ended the airplane was in a steep, rapidly descending left turn. The fragmented airplane wreckage, due to impact and subsequent explosive forces, was located in a wooded area about 6 miles south-southwest of the departure airport. Examination of the accident site revealed a near vertical high-speed impact consistent with an in-flight loss of control. The on-site examination of the airframe remnants did not show evidence of preimpact malfunction.
    [Show full text]
  • May 25, 2018 Request for Proposals No. 28017 Offsite Virtual Net Metering
    May 25, 2018 Request for Proposals No. 28017 Offsite Virtual Net Metering I. Introduction The Rhode Island Airport Corporation (RIAC) seeks proposals from qualified enterprises to provide offsite virtual net metering through which any net metering credits will accrue to the benefit of RIAC (the RFP). Respondents are free to propose any development model that satisfies the requirements of chapter 26.4 of title 39 of the Rhode Island General Laws. Respondents will have sole responsibility for planning, permitting, designing, installing, financing, operating, and maintaining the virtual net metering system. II. General Background RIAC manages the State of Rhode Island’s six airports and is a subsidiary of the Rhode Island Commerce Corporation (CommerceRI). RIAC was created on December 9, 1992, as a subsidiary public corporation, governmental agency, and public instrumentality having a distinct legal existence from CommerceRI and the State. RIAC assumed responsibility for the State’s six airports on July 1, 1993. The powers of RIAC are vested in a seven-member Board of Directors that is authorized, pursuant to its Articles of Incorporation and the Lease and Operating Agreement among the State of Rhode Island, the Rhode Island Department of Transportation, and RIAC, dated as of June 25, 1993, to undertake the planning, development, management, and operation of the six airports —T.F. Green State Airport, North Central State Airport, Newport State Airport, Block Island State Airport, Quonset State Airport, and Westerly State Airport. Chapter 26.4 of title 39 of the Rhode Island General Laws governs net metering of renewable energy in the State of Rhode Island and allows a “public entity,” defined by R.I.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents Section 1
    PLAN OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT 2017– 2027 GRISWOLD, CONNECTICUT PLAN OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT 2017 - 2027 Town of Griswold, Connecticut Borough of Jewett City, Connecticut Plan Contents Introduction History and Population Demographics Inventory and Analysis Goals and Recommendations Implementation Conclusion Consistency with State Plan of Conservation and Development Plan Maintenance and Amendments This plan was adopted at a legally convened meeting of the Griswold Planning and Zoning Commission Adoption Date 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1. INTRODUCTION 1.A INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.B STATUTORY AUTHORITY & CONTENT ....................................................................................... 1 1.C PLAN PHILOSOPHY..................................................................................................................... 2 SECTION 2. HISTORY AND POPULATION DEMOGRAPHICS 2.A HISTORY OF GRISWOLD ............................................................................................................. 3 2.B POPULATION TRENDS ................................................................................................................ 5 SECTION 3. INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS 3.A TRANSPORTATION ................................................................................................................... 11 3.B HOUSING ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PVD 2016 Budget.Pdf
    Introduction RHODE ISLAND AIRPORT CORPORATION BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016 INTRODUCTION The Rhode Island Airport Corporation (RIAC) was created by the Rhode Island Port Authority and Economic Development Corporation, now the Rhode Island Commerce Corporation (Commerce RI), on December 9, 1992, as a subsidiary public corporation, governmental agency and public instrumentality, having a distinct legal existence from the State of Rhode Island (State), and Commerce RI, and having many of the same powers and purposes of Commerce RI. Pursuant to its Articles of Incorporation, RIAC is empowered to undertake the planning, development, management, acquisition, ownership, operations, repair, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, renovation, improvement, maintenance, sale, lease, or other disposition of any “airport facility” as defined in Rhode Island General Law. Pursuant to the Lease and Operating Agreement by and between the State of Rhode and Providence Plantations, the Rhode Island Department of Transportation, and RIAC dated as of June 25, 1993, RIAC leased, initially for a period of thirty (30) years, all of the airports which previously had been under the jurisdiction of the Department of Transportation of the State of Rhode Island. The Lease Agreement was extended in Fiscal Year 2008 through June 30, 2038. The rental rate per the lease is $1 per year. Pursuant to the Lease Agreement, effective July 1, 1993, the State transferred to RIAC all of the personal property and other assets of the State located at or relating to the six airports. RIAC operates on a July 1 to June 30 fiscal year (FY) basis. RIAC was created to operate as a self-sustaining entity and receives no funds from the State’s General Purpose Fund for the operation and maintenance of any of the six airports under its jurisdiction.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX 1. HELICOPTER DATA Table A1
    AC 150/5390-2B September 30, 2004 Appendix 1 APPENDIX 1. HELICOPTER DATA 1. INTRODUCTION. This appendix contains 2. VERIFICATION. The published information selected helicopter data needed by a heliport has been verified by the various helicopter designer. These data represent the most critical manufacturers and is current as of the date of weight, dimensional, or other data entry for that publication. If more specific data is needed, contact helicopter model, recognizing that specific versions the manufacturer(s) of the specific helicopter(s) of of the model may weigh less, be smaller in some interest. feature, carry fewer passengers, etc. A Manufacturer name and helicopter model B Maximum takeoff weight in pounds. C Overall length in feet. (Rotors at their maximum extension.) D Overall height in feet. (Usually at tail rotor.) E Rotor diameter in feet. F Rotor plane clearance in feet. G Distance from rotor hub to tip of tail rotor in feet. H Tail rotor diameter (in feet) I Tail rotor ground clearance in feet. J Type of undercarriage. K Undercarriage length in feet. L Undercarriage width in feet. (The distance between the outside edges of the tires or the skids.) M Number and type of engines N Number of crew and passengers. O Standard fuel capacity in gallons Table A1- 1. Legend for Figure A1-1 and Table A1-2 141 September 30, 2004 AC 150/5390-2B Appendix 1 Figure A1-1. Helicopter Dimensions 142 AC 150/5390-2B September 30, 2004 Appendix 1 Table A1-2 Helicopter Dimensions A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Max.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MAINE HIGHLANDS 2020 Economic Impact & Visitor Tracking Report January – December 2020 INTRODUCTION
    THE MAINE HIGHLANDS 2020 Economic Impact & Visitor Tracking Report January – December 2020 INTRODUCTION 2 STUDY OBJECTIVES – VISITOR JOURNEY The objective of this study is to examine visitors’ journeys in their trips to Maine and the subsequent economic impact of these journeys. This report examines trips to the Maine Highlands region. Traveler Trip Post-Trip Impact of Pre-Visit Profile Experience Evaluation Tourism o Planning cycle o Visitor origin o Visitor transportation o Uniqueness of Maine o Economic impact of tourism o Planning sources o Travel party o Nights stayed o Highlight of trip o Visitor direct spending o Reasons for visiting composition o Accommodations o Recommending Maine o Number of visitors o Other considered o Visitor demographics o Booking methods o Satisfaction with trip o Room nights generated destinations o Previous visits o Trip resources o Likelihood of returning o Jobs supported by tourism o Exposure to o Visitor activities o Perceptions of Maine o Wages generated by advertising o Expectations vs. tourism o Advertising sources experience o State & local taxes o Visitor spending supported by tourism o Included amenities o Occupancy o Other areas visited o Average daily rates o Revenue per available room 3 METHODOLOGY Visitor Tracking 601 interviews were completed with visitors to the Maine Highlands region online and in-person at local attractions, parks, hotels, visitor centers, Service Plazas, shops, downtown areas and events between January 1st and December 31st, 2020.* Economic Impact Total economic impact of tourism on the Maine Highlands is a function of direct spending by visitors to the region, as well as the indirect and induced effects of this spending, such as increased business and household spending generated by tourism dollars.
    [Show full text]
  • AAAE Delivers for Airport Executives
    AAAE DELIVERS FOR AIRPORT EXECUTIVES MEDIAKIT 1 Industry Friends and Colleagues: As we prepare for 2010, Airport Magazine is developing articles that will address industry concerns about the nation’s economic recovery; share lessons learned from the recession and the price of fuel and its impact on air service; provide timely information on regulatory and legislative issues; fulfill the far-ranging needs of airports for training information; describe the lessons airports have learned on subjects that include ARFF, technology and airfield and terminal improvements; and much more. Every feature and department in Airport Magazine is designed to deliver relevant, timely and insightful information to our readers. We have crafted our 2010 editorial calendar with these goals in mind. The 2010 lineup combines familiar topics — such as baggage screening, concessions and winter operations — with emerging ones that include NextGen and green airports. Our format will be as varied as our selection of articles: we’ll have roundtables with industry experts; articles written by airport officials; interviews with government and industry officials; and photo features to highlight aspects of our industry. Our ambitious plans for 2010 would not be possible, however, without the faithful support of Airport Magazine’s advertisers. For more than 20 years, companies that advertise to the airport community have trusted Airport Magazine to deliver their message to this audience. For potential advertisers, please consider this: by choosing our magazine to communicate your message, you are supporting not just an advertiser-funded magazine, but an entire association — the American Association of Airport Executives. All of us at Airport Magazine look forward to working with you in 2010 and beyond.
    [Show full text]