DOCSLIB.ORG

Connecticut Airport Authority

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

NEW ISSUES Ratings: See “RATINGS” herein. BOOK-ENTRY ONLY In the opinion of Pullman & Comley LLC, Bond Counsel to the Authority, rendered in reliance upon and assuming the accuracy of and continued compliance with certain representations and covenants relating to certain requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), under existing laws, regulations, rulings and judicial decisions, interest on the Series 2019 A Bonds is not included in gross income for federal income tax purposes. In addition, (i) interest on the Series 2019 A Bonds is an item of tax preference for purposes of computing the individual alternative minimum tax, and (ii) interest on the Series 2019 A Bonds is not excludable from the gross income of owners who are “substantial users” of the facilities financed thereby. See “TAX MATTERS” herein. In the opinion of Bond Counsel, under existing law, interest on the Series 2019 B Bonds is included in gross income for federal income tax purposes pursuant to the Code. See “TAX MATTERS” herein. In the opinion of Bond Counsel, under existing statutes, interest on the Series 2019 A Bonds and the Series 2019 B Bonds is excluded from Connecticut taxable income for purposes of the Connecticut income tax on individuals, trusts and estates and is excluded from amounts on which the net Connecticut minimum tax is based in the case of individuals, trusts and estates required to pay the federal alternative minimum tax. See TAX MATTERS herein. $151,100,000 CONNECTICUT AIRPORT AUTHORITY Customer Facility Charge Revenue Bonds (Ground Transportation Center Project) $35,410,000 $115,690,000 Series 2019 A Series 2019 B (AMT) (Federally Taxable) Dated: Date of Delivery Due: July 1 as shown on the inside cover The Connecticut Airport Authority (the “Authority”) is issuing its Customer Facility Charge Revenue Bonds (Ground Transportation Center Project), Series 2019 A (AMT) (the “Series 2019 A Bonds”), and Customer Facility Charge Revenue Bonds (Ground Transportation Center Project), Series 2019 B (Federally Taxable) (the “Series 2019 B Bonds,” and together with the Series 2019 A Bonds, the “Series 2019 Bonds”), to (a) finance a portion of the costs of the development and construction of a consolidated rental car facility and related improvements at Bradley International Airport (the “Airport”), (b) fund a debt service reserve fund and coverage fund for the Series 2019 Bonds, (c) pay capitalized interest on the Series 2019 Bonds, and (d) pay the costs of issuance of the Series 2019 Bonds. See “PLAN OF FINANCE AND APPLICATION OF THE SERIES 2019 BOND PROCEEDS” herein. The Series 2019 Bonds are special limited obligations of the Authority, payable solely from and secured by a pledge of the Trust Estate, which includes, among other things, Customer Facility Charges collected by the rental car companies operating at the Airport and remitted to the Trustee, as assignee of the Authority, monthly Facility Payments made by the rental car companies, and, under certain circumstances, Contingent Payments payable by the rental car companies operating at the Airport and remitted to the Trustee, as assignee of the Authority, and certain funds and accounts held by the Trustee under the Indenture. No revenues of the Authority, other than the Customer Facility Charges, Facility Payments and the Contingent Payments, are pledged to the payment of the Series 2019 Bonds. NEITHER THE PROJECT (AS DEFINED HEREIN) NOR ANY OTHER PROPERTIES OF THE AUTHORITY ARE SUBJECT TO ANY MORTGAGE OR OTHER LIEN FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE OWNERS OF THE SERIES 2019 BONDS, AND NEITHER THE FULL FAITH AND CREDIT OF THE AUTHORITY AND ANY AGENCY OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT NOR THE FULL FAITH AND CREDIT AND THE TAXING POWER OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT OR ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT IS PLEDGED TO THE PAYMENT OF THE PRINCIPAL OF OR INTEREST ON THE SERIES 2019 BONDS. SEE “SECURITY AND SOURCES OF PAYMENT FOR THE SERIES 2019 BONDS.” The Series 2019 Bonds will be issued as fully registered bonds in the name of Cede & Co., as registered owner and nominee of The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”), New York, New York. Individual purchases and sales of the Series 2019 Bonds may be made in book-entry-form only in denominations of $5,000 and integral multiples thereof. Interest on the Series 2019 Bonds will be payable on January 1 and July 1, commencing on July 1, 2019. So long as the Series 2019 Bonds are held by DTC, the principal and redemption price of and interest on the Series 2019 Bonds will be payable by wire transfer to DTC, which in turn will be required to remit such principal, redemption price and interest to the DTC participants for subsequent disbursement to the beneficial owners of the Series 2019 Bonds, as more fully described herein. See “APPENDIX G—BOOK-ENTRY-ONLY SYSTEM.” Maturity Schedule on Inside Front Cover The Series 2019 Bonds are subject to optional, mandatory sinking fund and extraordinary mandatory redemption prior to maturity, as more fully described herein. See “DESCRIPTION OF THE SERIES 2019 BONDS—Redemption Provisions.” The purchase and ownership of Series 2019 Bonds involve investment risk and may not be suitable for all investors. This cover page contains certain information for general reference only. It is not intended to be a summary of the security or terms of the Series 2019 Bonds. Investors are advised to read the entire Official Statement, including any portion hereof included by reference, to obtain information essential to the making of an informed decision, giving particular attention to the matters discussed under “CERTAIN INVESTMENT CONSIDERATIONS.” Capitalized terms used on this cover page and not otherwise defined have the meanings set forth herein. The scheduled payment of principal of and interest on the Series 2019 B Bonds maturing on July 1 of the years 2030 through 2032, inclusive (the “Insured Bonds”), when due will be guaranteed under an insurance policy to be issued concurrently with the delivery of the Insured Bonds by Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. The Series 2019 Bonds are offered when, as and if issued by the Authority, subject to the approval of validity by Pullman & Comley, LLC, Bond Counsel to the Authority, and to certain other conditions. Certain legal matters will be passed upon for the Authority by its General Counsel. Certain legal matters will be passed upon for the Underwriters by their counsel, Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP. Frasca & Associates, LLC has served as Municipal Advisor to the Authority. It is expected that the delivery of the Series 2019 Bonds will be made through the facilities of DTC on or about April 9, 2019. BofA Merrill Lynch Citigroup Wells Fargo Securities Date of Official Statement: March 27, 2019 MATURITY SCHEDULE $35,410,000 Connecticut Airport Authority Customer Facility Charge Revenue Bonds (Ground Transportation Center Project), Series 2019 A (AMT) $20,000,000 5.000% Term Bonds due July 1, 2049, Yield: 3.330%1; CUSIP No.2: 20773CAA4 $15,410,000 4.000% Term Bonds due July 1, 2049, Yield: 3.650%1; CUSIP No. 2: 20773CAB2 $115,690,000 Connecticut Airport Authority Customer Facility Charge Revenue Bonds (Ground Transportation Center Project), Series 2019 B (Federally Taxable) Maturity Date Principal Interest (July 1) Amount Rate Yield CUSIP No.2 2023 $ 1,840,000 2.866% 2.866% 20773CAC0 2024 3,495,000 2.916% 2.916% 20773CAD8 2025 3,595,000 3.024% 3.024% 20773CAE6 2026 3,705,000 3.174% 3.174% 20773CAF3 2027 3,820,000 3.281% 3.281% 20773CAG1 2028 3,945,000 3.431% 3.431% 20773CAH9 2029 4,085,000 3.531% 3.531% 20773CAJ5 20303 4,225,000 3.611% 3.611% 20773CAK2 20313 4,380,000 3.711% 3.711% 20773CAL0 20323 4,540,000 3.811% 3.811% 20773CAM8 2033 4,715,000 3.981% 3.981% 20773CAN6 2034 4,900,000 4.081% 4.081% 20773CAP1 $27,710,000 4.132% Term Bonds due July 1, 2039, Yield: 4.132%; CUSIP No. 2: 20773CAQ9 $40,735,000 4.282% Term Bonds due July 1, 2045, Yield: 4.282%; CUSIP No. 2: 20773CAR7 1 Priced to the July 1, 2029 optional call date. 2 Copyright, American Bankers Association. The CUSIP numbers are provided by S&P Global Ratings, CUSIP Service Bureau, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. The CUSIP numbers are being provided solely for the convenience of Bondholders only at the time of issuance of the Series 2019 Bonds, and the Authority and the Underwriters do not make any representation with respect to such numbers or undertake any responsibility for their accuracy now or at any time in the future. The CUSIP number for a specific maturity is subject to being changed after the issuance of the Series 2019 Bonds as a result of various subsequent actions including, but not limited to, a refunding in whole or in part of such maturity or as a result of the procurement of secondary market portfolio insurance or other similar enhancement by investors that is applicable to all or a portion of certain maturities of the Series 2019 Bonds. 3 Insured Bonds. CONNECTICUT AIRPORT AUTHORITY BOARD Thomas A. Sheridan (Chair) Michael T. Long (Vice Chair) Joseph Giulietti David Lehman Robert J. Aaronson Brett C. Browchuk J. Scott Guilmartin Karen Jarmoc Mary Ellen S. Jones Matthew J. Kelly Shawn Wooden BRADLEY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MANAGEMENT Kevin A. Dillon, A.A.E., Executive Director Michael W. Shea, Deputy Executive Director - Finance Sharon Traficante, Deputy Executive Director - Administration Benjamin G. Parish, ACE, C.M., Director of Bradley Operations Robert Bruno, Director of Planning, Engineering and Environmental Services Paul K. Pernerewski, Jr., General Counsel TRUSTEE BOND COUNSEL U.S.
Recommended publications
  • Groton-New London Airport (GON)

    Groton-New London Airport (GON)

    DECEMBER 2017 FINAL Environmental Assessment (EA) & Environmental Impact Evaluation (EIE) for Obstruction Removal Groton-New London Airport (GON) Prepared for: Prepared by: FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (EA) FOR OBSTRUCTION REMOVAL GROTON‐NEW LONDON AIRPORT (GON) FAA AIP NO. 3‐09‐0900‐010‐2014 CAA CONTRACT NO. 2014‐02 CHA CONTRACT NO. 29067 June 2017 Prepared for: Connecticut Airport Authority (CAA) Prepared BY: CHA Consulting, Inc. Groton‐New London Airport (GON) Obstruction Analysis ‐Tree Removal FEDERAL FINDING After careful and thorough consideration of the facts contained herein, the undersigned finds that the proposed federal action is consistent with existing national policies and objectives as set forth in Section 101 of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and other applicable environmental requirements and will not significantly affect the quality of the human environment or otherwise include any condition requiring consultation pursuant to Section 101 (2) (c) of the NEPA. Approved: 6/9/17 Richard Doucette Date Manager, Environmental Programs RECORD OF DECISION ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT EVALUATION (EIE) FOR OBSTRUCTION REMOVAL GROTON‐NEW LONDON AIRPORT (GON) FAA AIP NO. 3‐09‐0900‐010‐2014 CAA CONTRACT NO. 2014‐02 CHA CONTRACT NO. 29067 December 2017 Prepared for: Connecticut Airport Authority (CAA) Prepared BY: CHA Consulting, Inc. Notice: On November 11, 2017, the State of Connecticut, Office of Policy and Management (OPM) determined that the Connecticut Airport Authority (CAA) “shall not be construed to be a department, institution or agency of the state”, and that the Connecticut Environmental Policy Act (CEPA) is not applicable to CAA actions. See CT OPM notice included in Appendix B.
  • Indianapolis Airport Authority 7800 Col

    Indianapolis Airport Authority 7800 Col

    STATE OF INDIANA AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 302 WEST WASHINGTON STREET ROOM E418 INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA 46204-2765 Telephone: (317) 232-2513 Fax: (317) 232-4711 Web Site: www.in.gov/sboa June 13, 2016 Board of Directors Indianapolis Airport Authority 7800 Col. H. Weir Cook Memorial Drive, Suite 100 Indianapolis, IN 46241 We have reviewed the audit report prepared by BKD LLP, Independent Public Accountants, for the period January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015. In our opinion, the audit report was prepared in accordance with the guidelines established by the State Board of Accounts. Per the Independent Public Accountants' opinion, the financial statements included in the report present fairly the financial condition of the Indianapolis Airport Authority, as of December 31, 2015 and the results of its operations for the period then ended, on the basis of accounting described in the report. The Independent Public Accountants' report is filed with this letter in our office as a matter of public record. Paul D. Joyce, CPA State Examiner Indianapolis Airport Authority Independent Auditor’s Report and Financial Statements December 31, 2015 and 2014 Indianapolis Airport Authority December 31, 2015 and 2014 Contents Independent Auditor’s Report ............................................................................................... 1 Management’s Discussion and Analysis ............................................................................. 4 Financial Statements Balance Sheets .................................................................................................................................
  • I APPENDIX Page Tweed-New Haven Airport

    I APPENDIX Page Tweed-New Haven Airport

    i APPENDIX Page Tweed-New Haven Airport Authority v. Tong, No. 17-3481-cv and No. 17-3918-cv, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, Judgment entered July 9, 2019 ................................................ 1a Tweed-New Haven Airport Authority v. Jepsen, Case No. 3.15cv01731 (RAR), U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut, Judgment entered October 3, 2017 ...................... 24a Tweed-New Haven Airport Authority v. Jepsen, Case No. 3.15cv01731 (RAR), U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut, Ruling on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss entered December 9, 2016 .................................................. 68a Tweed-New Haven Airport Authority Act, C.G.S.A. § 15-120g et seq. ...................................... 88a Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution, Article VI, Clause 2 ....................... 108a Connecticut Constitution, Article Tenth, § 1 ......... 108a Federal Aviation Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 40103 ............. 109a 14 C.F.R. § 139.1 ..................................................... 111a 1a 930 F.3d 65 United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. TWEED-NEW HAVEN AIRPORT AUTHORITY, Plaintiff-Appellant, City of New Haven, Intervenor Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William TONG, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Connecticut, Defendant-Appellee.* No. 17-3481-cv; 17-3918-cv | August Term 2018 | Argued: December 12, 2018; | Decided: July 9, 2019 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, No. 15 Civ. 1731 (RAR), Robert A. Richardson, Magistrate Judge, Presiding. Attorneys and Law Firms Hugh I. Manke, John C. King, Christopher A. Klepps, Updike, Kelly & Spellacy, P.C., Hartford, Ct., for plaintiff-appellant Tweed-New Haven Airport Authority. John Rose, Jr., Corporation Counsel, New Haven Office of the Corporation Counsel, New Haven, Ct., for intervenor plaintiff-appellant Tweed-New Haven Airport Authority.
  • Table of Contents

    Table of Contents

    TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ ES1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Business Plan Process .................................................................................................. 2 1.2 Airport Profile .............................................................................................................. 3 2.0 EXISTING AIRPORT CHARACTERISTICS............................................................................ 5 2.1 Physical Characteristics ............................................................................................... 5 2.2 Existing Airport Tenants .............................................................................................. 6 2.3 Management Structure ............................................................................................... 7 2.4 Historical Airport Data ................................................................................................. 8 2.5 Baseline Financial Data ................................................................................................ 9 3.0 AIRPORT MARKET AREA .............................................................................................. 11 4.0 SWOT ANALYSIS FOR WATERBURY-OXFORD AIRPORT ................................................. 15 4.1 SWOT Components ..................................................................................................
  • ACRP 03-31 Bibliography Last Update: June 15, 2016

    ACRP 03-31 Bibliography Last Update: June 15, 2016

    ACRP 03-31 Bibliography Last Update: June 15, 2016 Contents Air Cargo ....................................................................................................................................................... 2 Air Service ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 Economic....................................................................................................................................................... 9 Environmental ............................................................................................................................................. 13 Finance ........................................................................................................................................................ 16 Land Use ..................................................................................................................................................... 18 Media Kit ..................................................................................................................................................... 19 Noise ........................................................................................................................................................... 21 Role of the Airport ....................................................................................................................................... 23 ACRP 03-31: Resources Bibliography Page
  • A Woeful Tale of an Airport Subsidy

    A Woeful Tale of an Airport Subsidy

    August 22, 2018 Policy Brief: Volume 18, Number 32 A Woeful Tale of an Airport Subsidy Summary: The Allegheny County Airport Authority transferred a lot of money to OneJet Inc. to have them move their “focus” airport to Pittsburgh from Indianapolis. Promises of services to 10 destinations were made in exchange for the $3 million of loans and investments. It has not worked out well. OneJet Inc. began its existence by incorporating in Larkspur, California. Its headquarters is in Massachusetts. Its hub (focus) of operations—if two destinations can be called a hub—is in Pittsburgh. After beginning serious operations in Indianapolis in 2015 with great fanfare about service to cities throughout the Midwest and Pittsburgh, the airline dumped Indianapolis as its base in 2016 and entered into a heavily subsidized agreement to move its operations base to Pittsburgh. OneJet promised flights to 10 destination cities from Pittsburgh International Airport (PIT) in exchange for a $3 million “investment”. In October 2017, the airline received an unknown “investment” in Milwaukee to set up a secondary operations base. As of August 17, 2018, the airline operates to only five destinations— Hartford, Indianapolis, Pittsburgh, Albany and Buffalo. The Albany and Buffalo flights are only between those two New York cities. Two destinations remain for Pittsburgh—Hartford and Indianapolis. And flights from Hartford and Indianapolis are still in effect to each other and Pittsburgh. Note that, according to USA Today, Milwaukee business leaders made a significant investment in the airline last October. However, currently, Milwaukee is not a second focus airport and is not even a OneJet destination.
  • TSA Precheck Program Guide

    TSA Precheck Program Guide

    TravelPrecheck.org TSA PreCheck Program Guide What you Need to Know to Speed Up your Travels Table Of Contents Guide Introduction 06 About The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) 08 About The TSA PreCheck Program 10 Five Reasons To Enroll In TSA PreCheck 11 TSA PreCheck Eligibility Requirements 13 Pre-Approved Trusted Traveler Groups 14 TSA PreCheck For Military Personnel 16 Who Is ineligible to apply for TSA PreCheck? 18 The TSA PreCheck Application Process 20 Required Documents For TSA PreCheck Applicants 21 Post-TSA PreCheck Application Steps 23 Can I appeal a TSA PreCheck application denial? 24 Revocation of TSA PreCheck Memberships 25 TSA PreCheck Membership Renewal 26 TSA PreCheck Participating Airports 28 Airlines That Participate in TSA PreCheck 40 About Global Entry 44 TSA PreCheck vs. Global Entry 45 Checklist Of Prohibited TSA Items 47 TravelPrecheck.org | 6 Guide Introduction As Travel Day approaches, you have undoubtedly As a way to eliminate long wait times and lines, already gone through a routine checklist to get TSA now sponsors TSA PreCheck, which is a ready for your trip. From packing a bag you plan program that expedites the process through to carry on to the aircraft (void of prohibited airport security checkpoints. items), to scheduling transportation to the airport, preparations can be hectic. Of course, there are This exclusive traveler membership is ideal for almost always factors that are out of your control, frequent flyers. Once you enroll, gone are the days which may include uncooperative weather or associated with disrobing for security scanners. short-staffing at airport security, increasing the In addition, with TSA PreCheck benefits, you no time it takes for you to get to your airplane and longer need to unpack a suitcase or a bag as you board for departure.
  • Table of Contents Section 1

    Table of Contents Section 1

    PLAN OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT 2017– 2027 GRISWOLD, CONNECTICUT PLAN OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT 2017 - 2027 Town of Griswold, Connecticut Borough of Jewett City, Connecticut Plan Contents Introduction History and Population Demographics Inventory and Analysis Goals and Recommendations Implementation Conclusion Consistency with State Plan of Conservation and Development Plan Maintenance and Amendments This plan was adopted at a legally convened meeting of the Griswold Planning and Zoning Commission Adoption Date 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1. INTRODUCTION 1.A INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.B STATUTORY AUTHORITY & CONTENT ....................................................................................... 1 1.C PLAN PHILOSOPHY..................................................................................................................... 2 SECTION 2. HISTORY AND POPULATION DEMOGRAPHICS 2.A HISTORY OF GRISWOLD ............................................................................................................. 3 2.B POPULATION TRENDS ................................................................................................................ 5 SECTION 3. INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS 3.A TRANSPORTATION ................................................................................................................... 11 3.B HOUSING ................................................................................................................................
  • Chapter V: Transportation

    Chapter V: Transportation

    Transportation CHAPTER V: TRANSPORTATION A. GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS Located at the junction of Interstate 91 and Interstate 95, as well as a key access point to the Northeast Corridor rail line, New Haven is the highway and rail gateway to New England. It is the largest seaport in the state and the region and also the first city in Connecticut to have joined the national complete streets movement in 2008 by adopting the City’s Complete Streets Design Manual, balancing the needs of all roadway users including pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists. Journey to Work Data For a U.S. city of its size, New Haven has substantial share (45 Aerial view of New Haven seaport: largest in the state and the region. percent) of commuters who use a form of transportation other than driving alone. Approximately 15 percent of all commuters travel via carpool, close to 14 percent walk to work, while over 11 percent use a form of public transportation. Of the 10 largest cities in New England, only Boston has a higher percentage of residents who travel to work via non-motorized transportation. Also, out of this same group of cities, New Haven ranked highest in the percentage of people who walked to work. New Haven Vision 2025 V-1 Transportation Vehicular Circulation There are 255 miles of roadway in the city, ranging from Interstate highways to purely local residential streets. Of these roadways, 88 percent are locally-maintained public roads and 12 percent are state-maintained roads and highways. There are 43 locally- maintained bridges in the city.
  • Opinion Letter to the Wicks Group PLLC on Aug. 22, 2009

    Opinion Letter to the Wicks Group PLLC on Aug. 22, 2009

    U,S,Department Office of the Chief Counsel 800 Independence Ave., S,w. of Transportation Washington, D.C. 20591 Federal Aviation Administration Glenn P. Wicks, Esq. Roncevert D. Almond, Esq. AUG 222008 The Wicks Group PLLC 1215 17th Street, N.W. Sumner Square, Fourth Floor Washington, D.C. 20036 RE: Opinion on the Runway Safety Area Project at Tweed-New Haven Airport Dear Messrs. Wicks and Almond: This is in response to your request for an opinion on the power of non-proprietors to regulate airport development within the existing boundaries of an airport. In the context of the Town of East Haven's use of its zoning powers to prevent Tweed-New Haven Airport (Airport) from enlarging its runway safety areas' (RSAs) at each end of its air carrier runway, you ask specifically whether "a non-proprietor municipality's improper attempts to regulate the construction of an aviation safety project being carried out by the [Airport] Authority, an airport sponsor, entirely within the boundaries of the Airport and under the authority, approval, and supervision of the federal and state governments," would be federally preempted. Based upon the information in your letter and articulated below, our conclusion is that the Town of East Haven is federally preempted from using its police powers to prevent the Airport from attempting to comply with current FAA RSA standards, as recently mandated by Congress, through enlarging its sub-standard RSAs at either end of Runway 2/20 to meet those standards. 1. Background: The Tweed-New Haven Regional Airport Authority is the sponsor of the Tweed-New Haven Regional Airport (Airport).
  • Abele Announces Major Expansion of Onejet at Mke

    Abele Announces Major Expansion of Onejet at Mke

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Media contact line: (414) 519-8482 ABELE ANNOUNCES MAJOR EXPANSION OF ONEJET AT MKE MILWAUKEE (October 3, 2017) – Milwaukee County Executive Chris Abele has announced a major expansion of OneJet at General Mitchell International Airport (MKE), which will include two new nonstop destinations and the addition of a Milwaukee operating base. The air service announcement includes new nonstop service from MKE to Columbus, Ohio (CMH) and Omaha, Nebraska (OMA) beginning November 1. OneJet currently offers twice- daily service from MKE to Pittsburgh. “The opening of OneJet’s base of operation at MKE creates jobs and shows that Milwaukee is on the leading edge of this new business model providing nonstop access to important destinations in the Midwest,” County Executive Abele said. “The new service to Columbus and Omaha is outstanding news for travelers who need same-day flights to/from these cities.” “Milwaukee has proven to be an exceptional market for OneJet service, and this expansion underscores our commitment to bring nonstop service to important markets from MKE,” said Matthew Maguire, OneJet CEO. “We look forward to working with County Executive Abele and the Milwaukee Airport team as we evaluate additional growth in our network.” MKE to CMH flight schedule: CMH to MKE flight schedule: Depart 6:00am CT, Arrive 8:00am ET Depart 8:20am ET, Arrive 8:20am CT Depart 3:00pm CT, Arrive 5:00pm ET Depart 5:20pm ET, Arrive 5:20pm CT MKE to OMA flight schedule: OMA to MKE flight schedule: Depart 8:40am CT, Arrive 10:00am CT Depart 10:20am CT, Arrive 11:35am CT Depart 5:40pm CT, Arrive 7:00pm CT Depart 7:20pm CT, Arrive 8:35pm CT With the expansion, OneJet will offer a total of 60 nonstop flights to and from the Milwaukee area each week.
  • BDL Brochure.Pdf

    BDL Brochure.Pdf

    The Connecticut Airport Authority The Connecticut Airport Authority (CAA) was established as a quasi-public agency in 2011 to own, improve, and operate Bradley International Airport and the five state-owned general aviation airports (Danielson, Groton-New London, Hartford-Brainard, Waterbury-Oxford, and Windham). The CAA strives to provide excellent customer service and top-quality facilities for its passengers while making Connecticut’s airports more attractive to new airlines, establishing new routes, and supporting Connecticut’s overall economic development and growth strategy. The CAA’s five general aviation airports are also crucial components of the state’s overall transportation system, providing access to corporate aircraft, local pilots, and convenient charter service for regional businesses. Already, the CAA has achieved numerous milestones, including the addition of new Bradley service to Dublin (Ireland), Los Angeles, Pittsburgh, Fort Myers, Houston, Tampa and Washington, D.C. The Airports: Bradley International Airport Bradley International Airport (BDL) is a civil/military airport in Windsor Locks, Connecticut. Owned and operated by the Connecticut Airport Authority, it is the second-largest airport in New England. The airport is about halfway between Hartford and Springfield. It is Connecticut's busiest commercial airport with 93,461 operations for the calendar year ending 2015 and enplanements of 1,465,147 as of June, 2016. Airlines operating at Bradley International Airport include Aer Lingus, Air Canada, American Airlines, Delta, JetBlue, OneJet, Southwest, and United. As a dual-use military facility with the U.S. Air Force, the airport is also home to the 103rd Airlift Wing (103 AW) of the Connecticut Air National Guard.