Washington Elections Division 3700 SW Murray Blvd. Beaverton, OR 97005 County www.co.washington.or.us voters’ pamphlet
VOTE-BY-MAIL GENERAL ELECTION November 4, 2008
To be counted, voted ballots must be in our office by 8:00 pm on November 4, 2008
Washington County Dear Voter: Board of County This pamphlet contains information for several dis- Commissioners tricts and there may be candidates/measures included that are not on your ballot. If you have any questions, Tom Brian, Chair call 503-846-5800. Dick Schouten, District 1 Desari Strader, District 2 Roy Rogers, District 3 Attention: Andy Duyck, District 4 Washington County Elections prints information as submitted. We do not correct spelling, punctuation, grammar, syntax, errors or inaccurate information. W-2 W-3 washington CoUntY Sheriff
Rob Gordon
OCCUPATION: Sheriff, Washington County, since 2002
OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: 29 years with the Washington County Sheriff’s Office, 19 years of senior management experience in police and jail operations.
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: Graduate of George Fox University; Harvard University-JFK School of Government (Senior Executives in State and Local Government); FBI National Academy. Oregon Department of Public Safety Standards and Training Executive Certification in Police and Corrections, and Instructor Certification. PSU Mark O. Hatfield School of Government Certificate in Public Management.
PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: Chief Deputy Sheriff; Commander of Jail and Patrol operations; Lieutenant; Sergeant. Instructor in leadership, management, police ethics, public budgeting, field training program and the Oregon jail inspector certification course. Lead instructor of the Oregon State Sheriff’s Command College that trains public safety leaders statewide. United States Marine Corps, military corrections and military police.
SHERIFF ROB GORDON A PROVEN LAW ENFORCMENT LEADER
Washington County continues to be one of the safest communities in Oregon, despite rapid population growth. Sheriff Gordon has a record of integrity and efficient use of resources.
Sheriff Gordon has the critical combination of police and jail management experience. Several accomplishments during his six years include:
• Reduction in methamphetamine-related crimes • Reduction of early jail releases from over 4,000 per year to less that 300 per year • Expanded interagency teams to fight gangs, graffiti, fraud, drugs, internet sexual predators, computer crimes, and fugitives from justice • National accreditation twice in the last six years - the only Sheriff’s Office in Oregon to attain that honor • State accreditation of jail operations three times in the last six years
Your vote will allow Sheriff Gordon to continue his work toward:
• A community-wide approach to solving the gang / graffiti problems • Targeted enforcement against career and prolific criminals • Enhanced Crime Prevention, Community Education, Child Abuse Education and Awareness • Controlled expansion of the county jail with population growth
(This information furnished by Committee to Keep Rob Gordon Sheriff)
The above information has not been verified for accuracy by the county. W-4 washington CoUntY Commissioner, District 1 Commissioner, District 3
Dick Roy R. Schouten Rogers
OCCUPATION: Washington County OCCUPATION: Certified Public Commissioner Accountant / County Commissioner
OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: Attorney, legal counsel for local Managing Partner of large local firm government EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: Portland State University; Bachelor of UCLA Law School, JD; Santa Clara Science Degree; Numerous additional University, BS Political Science courses in finance, management and public finance PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: Clean Water Services Director; Beaverton Schools Capital Assets Review Committee; Past Chair, Tri-County PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: County Commissioner (current); Health Care Safety Net Enterprise; Metro Highway 217 and Greenspaces Mayor, Tualatin (3 terms), President Oregon Mayors Association; Clean Water Advisory Committees; Oregon Park Providers’ 2003 Legislator of the Year; Services Board; Numerous State, Regional and County Transportation and Past Chair, West Beaverton Neighborhood Association Planning Committees; Board Member of Enhanced Sheriffs Patrol, Urban Road Maintenance and Housing Authority District COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENTS: • Washington County Aging & Veteran Services Advisory Council ROY IS INVOLVED! • Regional Emergency Management Group • Tigard First Citizen • President, Beaverton Optimist Club • Past President - Tigard Rotary, Tigard Chamber, Tigard & Tualatin Jaycees, • Washington County Community Action Organization Board of Directors Meridian Park Hospital Foundation, Oregon Society of CPA’s ACCOMPLISHMENTS: • Created a 30-acre wooded, hilltop park in Beaverton/Aloha linked to the ROY IS KNOWN FOR: Regional Westside Trail • Listening and working hard for his District • Passed an ordinance making developers pay their fair share for parks • Being highly respected and for his integrity and courage through growth-impact fees • Being an effective, experienced leader • Created “Vision Action Network,” a community partnership promoting • A balanced and common sense approach to government education and housing • A reputation for fairness • Approved an ordinance reducing youth access to tobacco • Developed commuter train connecting Wilsonville, Tualatin, Tigard and ROY IS COMMITTED TO THESE VALUES: Beaverton • Seeking new creative solutions to our pressing growth issues • Developed new sidewalk and bicycle facilities • Streamlining government to be cost effective • Improved Hart, Farmington, Cornelius Pass and Baseline Roads • Maintaining a safe livable community • Funded new lanes for Highway 26 • Developing family wage jobs and economic growth FUTURE PRIORITIES: • A balanced approach to roads, transit and pedestrian traffic • Fight congestion and improve transportation • Supporting our public justice system and police to deter crime • Create additional parks and greenspaces • Preserving our farmland and open spaces • Improve water quality in our Tualatin River Basin • Providing environmentally sound solutions to water quality and air issues • Secure our future water needs • Encouraging citizen involvement • Increase local endowment funds for affordable housing • Continuing our award winning financial budget management and • Expand neighborhood cleanup efforts operating practices • End family homelessness in Washington County • Enhancing services for our seniors and children
ENDORSEMENTS: Roy and his family live in the Tigard area. He brings a wealth of experience and develops fresh, creative solutions to our county’s challenges. Roy “Commissioner Schouten works well with others to get things done.” is known on the Board as a problem solver, and a leader who has brought Tom Brian, Chair, Washington County Commissioners millions of Federal & State dollars to our County for public works through his hard work and dedication. “Commissioner Schouten is an effective partner for the law enforcement community.” VOTE FOR ROY ROGERS, OUR RESPECTED VOICE IN GOVERNMENT! Rob Gordon, Washington County Sheriff (This information furnished by Citizens To Re-Elect Roy Rogers) “Dick helps make Washington County a great place to do business.” Bruce Dalyrmple, Executive Vice President, Touchmark
“Dick works hard to fund essential human services.” Cathy Stanton, Beaverton City Councilor
“With a sharp mind, a breadth of both interests and knowledge, and an eagerness to work hard on a wide range of issues . . . Washington County voters can feel confident they have the right man for the job.” The Oregonian, 4/12/08
Thanks for your support, Washington County Commissioner Dick Schouten
Get involved -- visit supportschouten.com (This information furnished by Dick Schouten)
The above information has not been verified for accuracy by the county. The above information has not been verified for accuracy by the county. W-5 CitY of beaverton City Council, Position 3 City Council, Position 4
Cathy Catherine Stanton Arnold
OCCUPATION: Beaverton City Councilor OCCUPATION: Marketing Associate / Civic Volunteer OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: 25 years combined of business, community OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: activism, and current Beaverton City Micro Power Electronics, Marketing Council, since 1994. Provided import/ Associate; NASA Johnson Space Center, export documentation assistance to small Budget and Schedule Analyst; Precision and medium sized companies and acted Castparts, Manufacturing Production as Customs Broker and Freight Forwarder Planner; Business Information Systems for Edward M. Jones & Co., Inc, Portland, Consultant. Volunteer work with State, OR. County, Metro, and City government, Beaverton Chamber of Commerce and nonprofits including Habitat for EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: Graduate California State University, Chico, Humanity, Girl Scouts, Loaves and Fishes, Domestic Violence Center, Centro California; B.A. in History and a Secondary Teaching Credential. Cultural.
PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: City Council, Beaverton from EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: Master’s, summa cum laude, Finance, January 1994 to present. Prior Greenway NAC Chairman, Organized Fanno Texas A&M; Bachelor’s, magna cum laude, Economics, Texas A&M. Creek Clean-Up (1988-1991), Member Washington County Capital Projects Committee (1994-1996), Chairman City of Beaverton Traffic Commission PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: Mediator for Multnomah County (1993-1994), and Member of Transportation Update Committee (1987-1988). Small Claims Court, Washington County Truancy Court and Beaverton Dispute Resolution Center; Chamber of Commerce Leadership Beaverton COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT: Board and Business Advocacy Council; Senior Citizens Advisory Committee, •Gang intervention by Chairing the Beaverton Boys & Girls Club (1994) Committee for Citzen Involvement, Citizens with Disabilities Advisory •Pushed for passage of 24MPH speed limit in residential areas. Committee, Social Service Funding Committee; Metro Brownfields Taskforce; •Worked on passage of Photo Radar legislation for Beaverton. Metro Technical Advisory Committee, Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue Citizen’s •Currently on the Police Activities League (PAL) Board. Academy, Beaverton Police Citizen’s Academy. •Council liaison to Library Board (1993-1995). •Recipient of 1992 Vergie Ries Nic NAC Award. VISIONING: Thank you for your support in this election. What I am focusing •City of Beaverton Library volunteer since 2000. on next is to continue our work with the Visioning process that we started with you in 2007. What came from the citizens who participated were five I have been involved in the neighborhood and City of Beaverton contributing major area of focus: to improving our quality of life. This involvement and awaremess of our issues • Maintain and enhance livability facing Beaverton- crime and gangs, traffic and transportation, managing • Improve mobility growth and liveability, maintaining the City’s infrastructure, providing for • Build Community a viable business climate, school funding and sitings, inter-governmental • Create a vibrant central core cooperation, are just a few of the challenges facing Beaverton that I have • Maintain and enhance public services been involved in over the past 25 years. There are specifics for us to follow up on. Also proposed were three I believe that with the shrinking availability of dollars and the challenges we advisory groups to help - a Sustainability Committee, a Downtown Advisory are facing, we will all need to work more closely to solve problems. This is a Committee, and a Visioning Committee. These groups would help refine the challenge I accept. I wishto continue to make our community one of the most Visioning goals into prioritized, achievable projects, evaluate our progress in livable. I believe I have the experience, knowledge and dedication to do this. executing them and ensure they are modified over time to remain relevant to the greater community. These are important next steps. I am looking forward I thank you for the opportunity to serve you and request your continued to the changes coming! support and vote. Vote for Catherine Arnold Cathy Stanton, www.electcatherine.com Beaverton City Councilor www.CathyStantonForBeaverton.com (This information furnished by Catherine Arnold)
(This information furnished by Stanton Re-Election Committee)
The above information has not been verified for accuracy by the county. The above information has not been verified for accuracy by the county. W-6 ContinUeD CitY of beaverton CitY of forest grove City Council, Position 5 City Council
Marc Doug San Soucie Davis
OCCUPATION: Software company OCCUPATION: Stay at Home Dad, consultant Property Manager
OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: San OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: Soucie Consulting, since 2007; Passport Factory/Warehouse Worker, Elder-Care Online, Beaverton, Vice President, Giver, Property Manager Engineering and Content, 2001-2006; ShareThis, Portland, Vice President, EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: Engineering, 2000-2001; GemStone Banks High School Systems, Beaverton, 1990-2000; Wang Laboratories, Massachusetts, 1980-1990 PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: none EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: BA Music, Physics, Dartmouth College, 1978; MA Music Composition, UC San Diego, 1980 My wife of 19 years, Dana and I have lived in Forest Grove for the past 14 years and have chosen this beautiful city as the best place to raise our PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: Beaverton Planning Commission, children. I have lived in or near Forest Grove all of my life. appointed Jan 2007; Beaverton Committee for Citizen Involvement, appointed Jan 2006; Joint Water Commission, appointed Jul 2008; Washington County I believe it is each citizen’s duty to serve their community in whatever way Planning Commission, appointed Sep 2006, elected Chair Jul 2008 they are able. As an individual, I have been a citizen advocate at both the state and local level. Until now, I have been one voice representing one Beautiful Beaverton family. I believe it’s now time to be a voice representing the citizens of Forest Grove. I will be the voice on the council who advocates a more livable Forest Bold, Generous, Visionary, Successful, Desirable, Innovative, Proud Grove; addressing the current problems we face as a community, while Beaverton. We should always work to deserve all these ambitious maintaining our police and fire services among the finest in Oregon. The best descriptions, because Beaverton is a great community, bursting with experience for city government is the life experience of successfully meeting opportunity. the diverse needs of a family. I believe there is a balance to be reached between the services we expect from our city and the cost of services to I’ve lived or worked in Beaverton for most of 18 years. I’ve volunteered time citizens. I will work to sustain Forest Grove’s friendly small town atmosphere and energy to improve my community. I’ve served on appointed committees, while working within the community of local cities to solve regional issues. I help my NAC, I help the Chamber of Commerce, and I help the city with public projects. I love Beaverton, and am happy to contribute. I will always advocate the interests of the citizens of Forest Grove and never those of special interest groups or pet projects that plague government today. Experienced and Ready for Change It’s time to bring a fresh voice to the council, one who loves and serves his community and understands the role of government. Beaverton will have a new Mayor and a new Councilor. I want to serve because there are important goals, projects, and issues to tackle - improving I believe that those who lead a community best are those who serve their transportation, maintaining infrastructure, recruiting business, enhancing our community. Our families need to have a voice on the council, and I want to important places. I offer experience and leadership skills gained in my long be that voice. professional and volunteer career. I listen, I gather facts, I get people talking through issues. I would appreciate your vote and will do my best to be your voice on the City council. Beaverton deserves elected leaders who work with responsibility, professionalism, and a thoughtful eye toward the future. I will be that kind of (This information furnished by Doug Davis) leader for Beaverton.
Endorsements
Mayor Rob Drake City Councilors: Dennis Doyle, Catherine Arnold, Cathy Stanton County Commissioners: Tom Brian, Chair, Dick Schouten
NAC Chairs: David Kamin, 5 Oaks Triple Creek; Alton Harvey, Sr., Neighbors Southwest;
Bill Young, Highland: F. Ray Bowman, Denney Whitford/Raleigh West; Jim Persey, Greenway; Rhonda Coakley, Sexton Mountain.
David Bishop, Beaverton Police Chief Forrest Soth, former City Councilor Dan Maks, Planning Commission Chair Eric Schmidt, Committee for Citizen Involvement Chair
More at www.SanSoucieForBeaverton.com
(This information furnished by San Soucie for Beaverton)
The above information has not been verified for accuracy by the county. The above information has not been verified for accuracy by the county. W-7 CitY of forest grove City Council City Council
Aldie Victoria Howard Lowe
OCCUPATION: Land Use Consultant. OCCUPATION: Retired
OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: Interim City Administrator - Vernonia, 15 years purchasing and planning Oregon; Planning Director - Vernonia, professional in high tech industry. Oregon; Purser - Military Sealift Command, Pacific; Deputy Manager - EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: Kodiak, Alaska; Chief of Police - Kodiak, Attended Vernon Community College, Alaska; Planning Director - Tigard, Texas Oregon; City Councilman - Forest Grove, Oregon. Planning Commissioner - Forest PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: Grove, Oregon. Student-body President - Pacific University, Forest Grove, City Councilor 2004-2008 plus 2000-2002; Planning Commissioner 2003 and Oregon. 2004; member Budget Committee 1998 - 2001. City liaison, during last four years, to: Senior Center, Library and Parks Commissions, Fernhill Wetlands EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: Pacific University, Forest Grove, Oregon. Board, Joint Water and Barney Reservoir Commissions, Regional Water Bachelor of Science Degree in Communication; Portland State University, Providers Consortium, Clean Water Services Advisory Commission. Portland, Oregon. Masters Degree in Public Administration.
PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: Detailed above. City Councilor Victoria Lowe deserves a chance to finish what she’s started. Lowe’s signature as a 24-year Forest Grove resident is a life filled with service Excerpt from “Vernonia’s Voice” July 2008 editorial written by Scott Laird. to her community. That’s what energizes her! Lowe is known for her shrewd budget sense and skillful representation “When the flood hit Vernonia in December, Howard stepped up an assumed of citizen interests. Sensitive to Forest Grove’s large senior population, she the City Administrator’s position, a thankless job in most respects under works to keep spiraling costs in check. She helps keep the City on solid normal circumstances, but an almost impossible task in a natural disaster financial ground. recovery process. Howard initially proved to be the right man for the job, Jobs well done are the hallmarks of Lowe’s six years as City Councilor. assuming leadership and establishing a commanding presence at City Hall. She helped guide the creation of plans for emergency water distribution and Howard worked hard to find solutions to some long term and short term future water supply, and cost-effective management of the City’s watershed. problems. He was tireless, looking for answers, finding solutions, and getting A guardian of natural resources, Lowe’s recent efforts combine keeping help. He looked to protect his overworked staff at City Hall. He took a pay the GREEN in Forest Grove and increasing passive recreation for the future. cut and worked two jobs (City Planner and City Administrator) He wasn’t She enthusiastically participated in rewriting the City’s Vision Statement to everyone’s cup of tea, but one thing was sure - you always knew where you reflect emphasis on preserving and enjoying nature. She helped approve stood with Aldie Howard. He wore his feeling and his emotions on his sleeve, projects that implement the vision, such as the “Emerald Necklace” project, showing Vernonia he really, really cared. Whether you liked him or not, our land acquisition for trails; green lumber production in the City’s watershed; citizens owe Aldie Howard a debt of gratitude; he stepped up in our time of renovation and development of Lincoln and Thatcher Parks. greatest need and helped us get through a critical time. I for one would like Lowe keeps the spotlight on economic development in the downtown, as to say, “Thank you Aldie Howard”.” evidenced by new, upscale businesses and new sidewalks along Pacific and 19th avenues. I would appreciate your vote. Thank you. Victoria Lowe values Forest Grove’s small-town feel and will work to preserve this safe, livable community. (This information furnished by Aldie Howard) Victoria Lowe is endorsed by:
Carl Heisler Lois Hornberger Meredith (Bud) Bliss
“AIM HIGH, VOTE LOWE!”
(This information furnished by Victoria Lowe)
The above information has not been verified for accuracy by the county. The above information has not been verified for accuracy by the county. W-8 CitY of forest grove City Council City Council
Peter Elena Truax Uhing
OCCUPATION: Retired public school OCCUPATION: Grant Writer; Consultant teacher OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: Forest Grove City Council; Planning Teacher, Forest Grove High School and Commission; Grant Writer; Government Neil Armstrong Middle School from 1977 Certification Coordinator; Operations – 2005. Analyst.
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: High School, Queen Anne High School, Portland State University, B.S.; Gaston Seattle, WA, 1961 – 1964; College, High School Pacific University, Forest Grove, 1964 – 1968: B.S. History, 1969, M.S.T. 1982; Lewis and Clark College, Adminstrative Education, 1988 PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: Forest Grove City Council 2004-present; Economic Development Commission; Historic Landmarks PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: Forest Grove City Council; Commission; Forestry Commission; Budget Commission; Chair, Vice-Chair elected, November 2000, Re-elected, November, 2004; Forest Grove Planning Planning Commission; Board; Library Levy; Public Safety Committee; Let’s Commission; 1998 – 2000. Talk Metro.
In the eight years I have served on your City Council, I am pleased with the Community Involvement: Washington County Resource Center; Family accomplishments we have made. Resource Center; Boys and Girls Club; Feed the Family; Affordable Housing Project; Master Parks Committee; Friends of the Library. We have adopted a Local Operating Levy that allows us to restore cuts made in Public Safety. We continue to make use of grants and other funding My Key Qualities: sources to augment your operating budget dollars. We assume control • Resident for 32 years; citizen advocate; voice for Senior Citizens; of three streets vital to the well being of Forest Grove (Pacific and 19th promote economic health; support local business; work to make local Avenues and Sunset Drive). In addition, being a full-service city, we have, government efficient and responsive; promote policies and practices in a partnership with Pacific University, fashioned a second to none public to ensure quality of local government; listen and respond to Community; complex in Lincoln Park. And through another partnership with the Forest encourage alternative funding sources; knowledgeable about key issues; Grove Library Foundation and Friends of the Library, remodeled our own hands on leader; problem solver; broad based community support; public library Our Central Business District has undergone changes with fiscally conservative; tough on issues and special interests. sidewalk improvement including the continuation of personalized bricks in a My Goals: program started by the late Dale Mitcheltree, and continued by the Chamber • Public Safety and Community Well Being – recruit, train, and retain top of Commerce. quality staff. Taxes – Lower taxes and fees by pursuing alternate funding sources. Livability – Keep Forest Grove a family town while We have those successes, but we also have challenges and opportunities. continuing to meet the needs of a diverse and growing community. We need to find a way to move people, safely and quickly. And we need to do Represent - issues to Metro, Local, and State Government. Advocate - that without adding to the already overburnened roads in and around Forest your concerns, needs, and vision for our Community. Grove. We need to become still better friends with our environment. Clean air My Responsibility as a City Councilor: and clean water are things we can no longer take for granted. And we need to • Respect – Whether it is, a new neighborhood park or benches for senior do all this in light of increasing population. citizens, I seek to provide a platform where everyone is heard and valued. Accountability – Find efficient and cost effective solutions. I ask for the opportunity to continue to serve you as City Councilor. We are Leadership – make tough decisions; work with local business, in this together. investment, and jobs; Give Forest Grove a voice.
(This information furnished by Peter Truax) Thank you: For the opportunity to serve you the past four years. It will be an honor to continue to serve you as a City Councilor and complete the projects I began.
(This information furnished by Elena for Better Gov)
The above information has not been verified for accuracy by the county. The above information has not been verified for accuracy by the county. W-9 CitY of hillsboro Mayor City Council, Ward 1, Position B
Jerry Nenice Willey Busch Andrews
OCCUPATION: Certified Public OCCUPATION: Adult Nurse Practitioner, Accountant Hillsboro Women’s Clinic.
OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: Adult Shareholder, Jones & Roth, PC; CPA, 27 Nurse Practitioner, private practice for 11 years. years; Registered Nurse 18 years prior totaling 29 years in the healthcare field. EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: BA Washington State University, EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: Business/Accounting; Securities Financial MS, nurse practitioner focus, University of Advisor; Oregon Society of CPA’s; Portland; BSN, Linfield College – Portland American Institute of CPA’s. Campus, nursing school; ADN, Portland Community College;
PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: Hillsboro City Council, 1992- PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: Hillsboro City Councilor, since 1997; City Finance Committee Chair; Hillsboro Library Board Council Liaison; 2006; Hillsboro Finance Committee and Hillsboro Economic Development Hillsboro Library Foundation President. Council since 2006; Hillsboro Audit Committee, 2008; Glencoe High School Site Council, 2003-2005. MILITARY EXPERIENCE: United States Navy; Vietnam War Veteran. Hillsboro Then And Now: CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT: Hillsboro School District Budget Committee; A 3rd generation Hillsboro resident, Nenice understands balancing where Past President/Finance Chair, Hillsboro Chamber of Commerce; Hillsboro Hillsboro has been and where Hillsboro needs to go. As city councilor, Nenice Leadership Program; Hillsboro Rotary Club; Hillsboro Community Parade has collaborated with community members to preserve Hillsboro’s rich history Chair. and traditions. She’ll continue to encourage progress in the new century and vision for Hillsboro’s future. COMMUNITY RECOGNITION: Hillsboro Citizen of the Year; Hillsboro Business of the Year. Supports A Balanced Healthy Community By: • Supporting targeted investments in transportation for Hillsboro. AS THE NEXT MAYOR OF HILLSBORO – Jerry Willey provides leadership • Expanding after-school programming, parks, and recreation through experience & vision! opportunities. Hillsboro will be making critical decisions involving growth, public safety, new • Fighting for community investments like our Library, Aquatic Center, and business and transportation infrastructure. The Hillsboro Vision 2020 plan, Schools. developed with community input, is our roadmap to success. I understand • Prioritizing funding for public safety. Hillsboro and will work hard for quality education, smart growth, fiscal • Helping build a stable, predictable environment for business. responsibility, fair taxes and fees and provide strong leadership! I am a serious • Advocating for sustainable environmental practices and standards. public servant and strong community supporter! Fiscal Accountability: KEY AREAS OF EMPHASIS Nenice has been a strong supporter of maintaining Hillsboro’s record of fiscal Education – committed to strong partnership with the School District to responsibility putting community safety first. Making difficult financial choices provide excellent education benefits for an ethnically diversified population when necessary. and ensure Hillsboro youth receive the best education possible. You can count on Nenice to do the right thing, even if it is not popular, Growth and Employment – committed to planned and controlled growth in and she never stops working for us! business and residential areas and will work hard to attract businesses that – Ed Dennis, Hillsboro City Council President provide strong, diversified employment bases. I have worked side by side on park issues with Nenice Andrews and I Public Safety – committed to prioritizing spending to ensure essential services know that she is focused on getting results for Hillsboro. are provided to our community. – Elizabeth Nahl
Transportation – committed to advocating a comprehensive approach I ask for your vote for myself, and the Hillsboro park bond measure. involving businesses and citizens when dealing with infrastructure issues. Everywhere I go in Hillsboro people tell me that we need more parks and Maintenance and safety remain key focus. recreational opportunities. Vote yes on 34-151 and we’ll do it! – Nenice Busch Andrews, Hillsboro City Council SUPPORTERS OF JERRY WILLEY Bruce Starr, Oregon State Senator Supporters: State Representative David Edwards Aron Carleson, Transportation Committee Chair Hillsboro Police Officer’s Association, Pat Hess, President Edward Clarke MD David A. Andrews MD, Hillsboro Women’s Clinic Hillsboro City Council Mayor Tom Hughes (This information furnished by Nenice Busch Andrews) Councilors Ed Dennis, Aron Carleson, Doug Johnson, Olga Acuna
Business Leaders Bob Terry, Fisher Farms Rick Van Beveren, Reedville Café J.D. Fuiten, Metro West Ambulance Jeff LaGood, Advanced Technology Group
(This information furnished by Jerry Willey for Mayor Committee)
The above information has not been verified for accuracy by the county. The above information has not been verified for accuracy by the county. W-10 ContinUeD CitY of hillsboro City Council, Ward 3, Position B City Council, Ward 3, Position B
Mike Kimberly R. Castillo Culbertson
OCCUPATION: Engineering Manager OCCUPATION: Homemaker
OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: Over OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: ten years of management experience Stockbroker, campaign worker
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: Bachelors of Science, Brigham Young Pendleton High School, Portland Univeristy; Masters of Business Community College, Portland State Administration, Babson College (2008) University, International Business Studies
PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL Hillsboro City Councilor (2003 – 2006), Hillsboro Transportation Committee EXPERIENCE: Chair, Heart of Hillsboro Neighborhood Association, Steering (2003 – present), Hillsboro Budget Committee (2003 - 2006) Committee, CPO #9, OSU Master Gardener Volunteer, Hillsboro Farmers’ Market Board, Downtown Hillsboro Advisory Committee Family: Mike, his wife Becky, and their two children are active members of the community. Livability
“I bring city council experience and a unique view to the city council. My We must be able to use existing codes and rules to improve our record shows that I will work hard to strengthen and diversify Hillsboro’s neighborhoods and remake a vibrant, diverse Downtown. This requires a more employment base, insist on a balanced and sustainable approach to growth, useable process. I will work with city departments to open the process to the ensure a strong police and fire department, and fight hard to ensure our tax public and I will champion the improvements that help make Hillsboro a more dollars are put to good use.” – Mike Castillo livable city.
Strong Police and Fire Department Accessibility • Put more police officers on the street and delivered more funding for drug enforcement activities City Hall must be made more open to the people. This requires a flow of • Supported efforts to build an additional fire station and to improve information to be made available and accessible to the average citizen. I will response time work with the city departments to bring more information online and make it more searchable, so that we all may find the answers and solutions that we Balanced and Sustainable Growth need from the city. • Encouraged development that preserves Hillsboro’s precious natural resources Accountability • Enacted measures encouraging the use and development of renewable Our public officials must understand that their decisions affect people. This energy requires that people be able to speak and public officials must be willing to listen, despite their personal interests. I will use my experience as a Fiscal Responsibility neighborhood leader to help the council and city departments to be open and • Boosted transportation maintenance funding, saving taxpayers tens of transparent. millions of dollars in more costly repairs down the road • Removed taxpayer subsidies of federally mandated development reviews, As a City Councilor, I will keep your neighborhood’s interests in mind with saving millions of dollars each and every decision.
“As city councilor, Mike acted with integrity and always considered the long- term impact while making decisions.” (This information furnished by Kimberly R. Culbertson) --Tom Hughes, Mayor of Hillsboro
“Mike takes a collaborative approach to problem solving. He works with community leaders to find the best solution and always has Hillsboro’s best interest at heart.” --Ed Dennis, Council President, Hillsboro City Council
We also support Mike Castillo: Jerry Willey, 2008 Mayoral Candidate Joe Keizur, Former Council President, Hillsboro City Council Aron Carleson, Hillsboro City Council Nenice Andrews, Hillsboro City Council Doug Johnson, Hillsboro City Council Olga Acuña, Hillsboro City Council
Contact Mike at: [email protected]
(This information furnished by Friends of Mike Castillo)
The above information has not been verified for accuracy by the county. The above information has not been verified for accuracy by the county. W-11 CitY of hillsboro CitY of king CitY City Council, Ward 2, Position B City Council
Olga L. William B. Acuña Boyle
OCCUPATION: School Administrator OCCUPATION: Lieutenant (firefighter); Owner: Boyle EMS HazMat Education OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: Assistant Principal, Hillsboro High School, OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: I 2006–Present; Dean of Students–Liberty have been employed by a local fire High School, 2005–2006; Office of department as a firefighter for 21 years, Hispanic Outreach, Director–Hillsboro currently holding the rank of Lieutenant. School District, 2003–2005; Teacher In addition, I provide CPR, First Aid, AED, and Department Coordinator of ESL fire extinguisher, and hazardous materials and Foreign Language departments– training to various county offices, major Century High School, 1999–2003; Special businesses, and individuals. I have also Education Teacher and Department Coordinator–Glencoe High School, been a paid police officer with the City of Sherwood and in Madison County, 1992–1999; Washington County Migrant Summer School, Program Manager, Montana. 1997–2005 EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: High school diploma, two years of college EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: Glencoe High School, Bachelor of Arts/ courses, multiple job-related courses and seminars. Spanish from Oregon State University, Master of Science/Special Education from Portland State University, and School Administration Credential from PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: Currently, vice president of Lewis and Clark College the King City Civic Association and member of the King City Planning Commission. Previously, was appointed for a one-year term as the mayor of PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: Appointed to the City Council in Sherwood, Oregon, after serving nine years as a Sherwood City Councilor. January 2008 to fill a vacancy created by a resignation. I have five wonderful children and twelve grandchildren. If elected as a Optional Information: King City Councilor, I promise the citizens of our community a hardworking Councilor with integrity, honesty, and one who would provide the citizens a City of Hillsboro 2020 Latino Outreach Advisory Chair, 2005–2008 sounding board for their concerns and issues. My belief is that the citizens are the “owners” of the community and that any and all councilors/board City of Hillsboro 2020, Vision Implementation Committee member, 2005–2008 members work for you!
Intel Oregon, Community Advisory Panel, 2006–2007 (This information furnished by William B. Boyle)
Oregon Small School Initiative, Cabinet Member, 2003–2007
Oregon Bilingual Education Conference, Planning Committee, 2003–2005
Cesar E. Chavez Student Leadership Planning Committee, 2003–2005
Community Action Policy Council–Head Start, community representative, 2003–2005
Liberty HS Planning Team Member, 2001–2003
Board Member – Northwest Regional Educational Laboratories, 1998 – 2001
Oregon Superintendent Advisory Content Panel for Spanish Assessments – Oregon State Department of Education, 1996 – 2001
Hillsboro School District Strategic Plan Committee, 2000
Multicultural High School Soccer League, Board Member and Co-Founder, 2000–2008
AS A COMMUNITY LEADER I PLEDGE TO WORK DILIGENTLY AND COLLABORATIVELY TO ENGAGE CITIZENS, THE BUSINESS COMMUNITY, SCHOOL LEADERS, AND OTHER KEY LEADERS AND ORGANIZATIONS TO CREATE SAFE NEIGHBORHOODS, PUBLIC SPACES, INNOVATIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS FOR OUR CHILDREN, AND A THRIVING ECONOMY.
(This information furnished by Olga L. Acuña)
The above information has not been verified for accuracy by the county. The above information has not been verified for accuracy by the county. W-12 ContinUeD CitY of north plains Mayor Mayor
David David E. Hatcher Smith
OCCUPATION: President, I.T. Business OCCUPATION: Artist (Un-paid) / Solutions Handyman (Paid)
OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: Small Business owner of a Computer 1996 : 2008 David Smith Renovation & Support company serving the Pacific Repair LLC (DBA) (Owner of a General Northwest Contracting Company); 1994 : 1996 Ace Glass of Wilsonville (General and EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: Scheduling Manager); 1983 : 1996 Kinney PCC, Portland State, University of Shoe Corporation (Sales Manager) Portland EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: Attended Bend Senior High School. PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: North Plains City Council – 12 Attended U.S. Air Force basic, specialist and NCO training schools. years; North Plains Planning Commission – 4 years; North Plains Budget Attended Community College of the Air Force (Arizona State and Cal-State Committee – 12 years; Representative to Metropolitan Area Communications overseas extensions). Attended Central Oregon Community College (ongoing Commission; Chair of Glencoe Interchange Negotiating Committee. education). LaSalle University (off campus degree program extension). Attended South Western Oregon Community College (ongoing education). I genuinely care for North Plains Attended Portland Community College (licensure and extension classes). I love this town and the people in it. That is how I feel and how I will approach my job as Mayor. PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: North Plains City Council Member, Chairman of the Urban Renewal Agency, Ex-officio Member of North Plains has been by home for 27 years. This is a wonderful place to raise Planning Commission, Ex-officio to the Library Board, Member of the Budget a family. In 2002, I received the “North Plains Volunteer of the year award.” Committee, Member of the Washington County Community Development I’m a Vietnam Veteran where I worked on B-52 Bombers. Block Grant Board. Certificates in Board Policy/Strategic Planning (2008) and Community Planning and Development (2007). Principally responsible The over riding issue facing North Plains has been growth and annexation. for the “North Plains Swim Trip” (2008 youth program). North Plains Planning I support “measured” growth. The reason why? Hillsboro is looking at Commission (2006), ODOT Stakeholders Working Group (SWG) for the increasing its Urban Reserve north of Highway 26 and will border North Plains upcoming Glencoe Interchange project (2007), North Plains Highway- at Jackson School Road. Soon, we will need to decide if we want to be Commercial re-zoning Committee (2007). Hillsboro, or do we want to remain North Plains. I want to remain North Plains. If growth does not happen, I can see North Plains loosing it’s voice and being I intend to use the office of Mayor primarily to promote volunteerism and swallowed up by Hillsboro. This would sadden me greatly. community involvement in North Plains so that we can do more with what we now have. I will bring my business and government experience to bear In 1999 I placed on the ballot in North Plains the “Vote for Annexation”, which on the City Council to enforce fiscal discipline. I will require good decision was approved by a wide margin. I believe that growth is such an important processes to assure our citizens protection and give a proper hearing to their issue that decisions like these should be a community wide effort. needs. I will focus the City Government on doing what can be done with what resources we have available and end the seemingly endless planning sessions ODOT is planning to build a new Interchange on Glencoe Rd. That’s the good and off-topic conversations which now take up much of our time. I will serve news. The bad news – ODOT also wants to eliminate any left/right turns to find what make North Plains such a great place and promote more of those from Glencoe Rd. to the businesses in that area. I chair a committee that’s things which work well. negotiating traffic management with ODOT. (This information furnished by David E. Smith) Elect David Hatcher for Mayor I care for North Plains and the people in it.
(This information furnished by Hatcher For Mayor)
The above information has not been verified for accuracy by the county. The above information has not been verified for accuracy by the county. W-13 CitY of north plains City Council City Council
Teri K. Robert (Butch) Haas Kindel
OCCUPATION: Client Associate OCCUPATION: Manager for Jewett - (No Photo Cameron Seed Co. OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: Submitted) 1999 - Present - D.A. Davidson & Co.; OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: 1997-1999 - Client Associate, Cascade Cleaning Agriculture products for growers Solutions; 1994-1996 - Home Visitor, in Washington County the past 43 years Parent Partner, Oregon Healthy Start Program, Bend, OR. EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: North Plains Grade School- 8 years EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: Hillsboro Union High 4 years Currently attending Portland Community College; Thomas More College, KY; University of Cincinnati, OH. PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: Elected to city council positions the past 28 years PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: None I have been employed the past 44 years in the Agriculture Industry. In Personal Statement: My name is Teri Haas. I am a single mother of two Washington County, Oregon. Now correctly called Jewett Cameron Seed Co. daughters. I have lived in North Plains for 2 years. I have volunteered for I have volunteered 30 years with the North Plains Fire Dept and now fullfilling over 10 years with the Girl Scouts of America. I’m running for a City Council my 10th year on the board of Washington County Fire Dist. #2. position because I care deeply about the community environment of North Plains. I grew up in a small town and have lived in several small towns over I am thankful to have had the time, energy and health to help my community. the course of my lifetime. In the few short years that I have lived here, I have developed a greater appreciation for the small town atmosphere yet I see the need for growth. Through careful consideration, I believe the people of North (This information furnished by Robert (Butch) Kindel) Plains can plan for the future growth of their community and still maintain the town’s uniqueness. I feel that the people of North Plains deserve leadership that can be honest, respectful, fair and committed to open dialogue regarding all matters of interest for its citizens. I would be proud to serve the citizens of North Plains.
(This information furnished by Teri K. Haas)
The above information has not been verified for accuracy by the county. The above information has not been verified for accuracy by the county. W-14 CitY of lake oswego City Council
Justin Luber
OCCUPATION: Marketing Manager, General Electric (GE); Small Business owner, Mt. Hood Ice Cream Company
OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: Account Manager, Unisys Corporation; Business Manager, Atlanta Committee for the Olympic Games
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: University of Notre Dame, MBA, Management; University of Georgia, BBA, Finance
PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: None
Lake Oswego is a wonder community. I am running for City Council to work together with our community residents, neighborhoods, and businesses to ensure we keep Lake Oswego as an attractive place to live, work, and play.
“Justin Luber bring business savvy and a vision for community building.” Lake Oswego Review, 7/17/08
“Luber would like to see the next city council settle the debate over the West End Building, keep a strong focus on rebuilding water and sewer infrastructure and maintain a continued emphasis on community growth.” Lake Oswego Review, 7/17/08
Managing Resources: Managing public money is a matter of public trust and a charge that should not be taken lightly. I want to promote fiscal responsibility, but ensure we don’t lose sight of projects and programs that are good for our community.
Business Friendly: I want Lake Oswego to be a place where all businesses can thrive. Additionally, I would like to implement a Business Incubation Center for aspiring Lake Oswego entrepreneurs. These programs have worked successfully with the support of city councils in cities like Colorado Springs, CO and Ypsilanti, MI.
Strong Schools: Lake Oswego schools are among the best. I will continue to support the School Board on programs to ensure our students have the resources to succeed in an increasingly competitive society. Yes on Measure 3-305!
Community Progress: The enrichment of our downtown and the Lake Grove district is vital. It’s important to continue the progress we’re currently realizing and to create an environment where Lake Oswego will be attractive for shopping, dining, and other services.
Dear Fellow Lake Oswegons, I ask for your trust and support. Together we can keep Lake Oswego a great place to live, work, and play.
www.luber2008.com
(This information furnished by Justin Luber for Lake Oswego City Council)
The above information has not been verified for accuracy by the county. W-15 CitY of portlanD Commissioner, Position 1 Commissioner, Position 1
Amanda Charles Fritz Lewis
OCCUPATION: Registered Nurse OCCUPATION: Non-Profit Executive Director OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: Seventeen years’ parent-volunteer, OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: Portland’s Public Schools Former small business owner; Habitat for Humanity; Peace Corps EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: BA/MA, Cambridge University EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: University of Portland, B.A.; Harvard PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: University, Kennedy School of Portland Planning Commission; Tryon Government, Masters in Public Policy Creek Watershed Council. PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: Ombudsman Associate, Mayor Community Involvement: Coalition for a Livable Future; Audubon researcher; Vera Katz; Intern, Senator Mark Hatfield neighborhood land-use/parks volunteer PERSONAL: Married, new father Amanda will: Spend Taxpayers’ Money Wisely and Stop Expensive Cost Overruns Creating Jobs, Watching the Bottom Line • Prioritize funding so every neighborhood and business district gets its fair share, with all essential needs met. “Charles doesn’t just talk about fiscal responsibility, he lives it. As a business • Toughen standards for City contracts so they no longer run 25% over owner and non-profit executive director, Charles knows how to create jobs, budget before City Council oversight. make payroll and provide important services while keeping a close eye • Require more audits of City projects to ensure efficient use of on the bottom line. In these tough economic times, that’s more important taxpayers’ money. than ever and one reason we support Charles.”
Amanda will: Improve Our Local Economy Judy O’Conner, Northwest Oregon Labor Council/AFL-CIO • Protect family wage jobs by attracting and retaining large and small companies. Innovative Solutions and the Determination to Get the Job Done • Ensure City contracts employ local workers. • Expand school-to-work apprenticeships. “Charles has proven expertise creatively solving problems with limited resources. When budget cuts eliminated music from many schools, Charles Amanda Fritz works hard and gets results for Portlanders took action. With just a dream and a credit card he founded Ethos Music • Helped lead OHSU’s nurses’ strike that stopped hospitals from cutting Center, which now serves over two thousand deserving children, has nurses and endangering patients’ lives. 78 employees and a budget of nearly a million dollars. That’s the kind of • After 22 years nursing mentally-ill Portlanders, she will coordinate City/ innovation and determination we need.” County services for homeless people. • Dedicated to keeping neighborhoods safe and increasing support for Annette Mattson, Board Member, David Douglas School District community policing. • Former mentor for at-risk kids and PTA mom, she will create Tireless Dedication to Schools and At-Risk Youth partnerships improving schools throughout Portland. “Charles has demonstrated he knows what it takes to improve our schools “Amanda is a longtime community leader, with a new perspective for and keep kids on the right track. His non-profit provides a well-rounded City Hall. She brings people together, moving past disagreements to education to thousands of children and an alternative to the streets, drugs accomplish shared goals.” Governor Barbara Roberts and violence that might otherwise rob them of their future.”
“strongest... most prepared to be a city commissioner.” Oregonian Jonah Edelman, Executive Director, Stand for Children endorsement, 4/24/08 The Right Experience and a Dedication to Public Service “Fritz trumps all her opponents when it comes to knowledge of the city budget and its programs.” Willamette Week endorsement, 4/30/08 Charles grew up in poverty, the son of a single mom who struggled to make ends meet. He went on to Harvard, and rather than cash in, came back to Broad range of endorsements: Portland to give back to the community. He has the background we need: Multnomah County Democrats (co-endorsement) business and non-profit experience with a commitment to public service. Multnomah County Republicans Unions, business leaders Dedication. Innovation. Experienced Leadership over a Lifetime. Tom Brian, Chair, Washington County Board; Charles Lewis for Portland City Council Lynn Peterson; Ted Wheeler Mayor-elect Sam Adams; Mayor Tom Potter www.charleslewis.com Gretchen Kafoury; Mike Lindberg 503-616-2655 Rex Burkholder; Robert Liberty Oregon League of Conservation Voters (This information furnished by Friends of Charles Lewis) Oregon State Council for Retired Citizens Oregon Nurses Association Portland Fire Fighters’ Assn. TVIP- Portland Association of Teachers AFSCME 189 More: www.AmandaFritzforCityCouncil.com/supporters (This information furnished by Amanda for Portland 2008)
The above information has not been verified for accuracy by the county. The above information has not been verified for accuracy by the county. W-16 ContinUeD CitY of sherwooD Mayor City Council, Position 6
Keith S. Robyn Mays Folsom
OCCUPATION: Vice President, OCCUPATION: Mother of five Electronic Wood Systems. OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: Bank OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: Manager, Actress Sales/Marketing/Operations/Credit Manager. EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: BS Accounting, BYU EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: B.S. Linfield College. PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: Sherwood Cultural Arts PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL Commission EXPERIENCE: 2005 to present: Mayor of Sherwood; 2001-2005: Sherwood City Council President; Budget Committee; Urban Renewal Board; 2003+: Political will–a term often used in government. In Sherwood political will has various Washington County Committees, I-5/99W Connector Project Steering been used to justify a decision made by one staff member when months of Committee; 2007+: League of Oregon City’s Transportation Committee, public hearings from citizens dictated another result. Political will has been Governor’s Transportation Committee on Governance; 1999-2001: Vice-Chair, used to approve projects that were outside the scope of the resources used Sherwood Planning Commission; to fund them and were not universal in their ability to serve our community. Some of these projects have been a drain on our general fund dollars, at a Community Involvement: time when our community has experienced unprecedented growth. Sherwood Rotary; Trustee, Columbia-Willamette YMCA; Friends of the Refuge. My concern is where is the will of the people in these decisions? The City of Sherwood has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars attempting to I moved to Sherwood in 1996 because of its sense of community and family ascertain the “will of the people” through citizen surveys, public meetings, atmosphere. I am committed to preserving the best of Sherwood. Adequate and the parks master plan. In my opinion the results of those surveys and transportation must be a priority along with parks, ball fields, open space/trail/ recommendations by paid professionals have largely been ignored in favor of Refuge system, supporting Festivals/Cultural Arts, preserve Old Town while an agenda supported by a small group of individuals with powerful political we redevelop, manage development/growth, good planning, expand School will. District partnership, and maximize each tax dollar. Recently, I received a letter from Mackenzie Bradley, a high school It has been a privilege serving the Sherwood community in some fashion for senior. Mackenzie was attending a political conference in Washington DC. the past 10+ years and as your Mayor for the past 4 years. Mackenzie asked me to run for political office. She told me “that I was the sort of person who would advocate for the issues that matter most to the During the next two years I look forward to continuing to work for solutions people of our community” and requested that I consider this “with an open to community needs and find opportunities for Sherwood to expand or create heart.” Mackenzie I have. It is my commitment to you and the citizens of new partnerships to address some of those needs. Sherwood that I will listen to the people and serve their needs to the best of my ability so that the will of the people and not political will, is served. #1 small town in Oregon In the past two years Sherwood has been recognized nationally for what a Mackenzie Bradley wonderful community it is. But it was not news to all of us. You could give the credit to a long list of groups, organizations and companies in town but at Dave Heironimus, Sherwood City Councilor the core it is due to the each you (each individual, each family) for what you do every day that makes Sherwood Great. Dan King, Sherwood City Councilor
Thank you for all you do. Linda Henderson, Sherwood City Councilor
(This information furnished by Keith Mays) Patrick Allen, Chair Planning Commission Patricia Barrow, Chair Sherwood Cultural Arts Commission
Shelly Lamb, Member Sherwood Cultural Arts Commission
Nathan Doyel, DMD
(This information furnished by Robyn Folsom)
The above information has not been verified for accuracy by the county. The above information has not been verified for accuracy by the county. W-17 CitY of sherwooD City Council, Position 4 City Council, Position 4
Bill Linda Butterfield Henderson
OCCUPATION: Vice President, Taurus OCCUPATION: Stay-At-Home Mother Power and Controls since 1991. I manage 45 employees in Oregon and Washington OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: Human Resources, Employee Benefits, OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: Payroll, Swim Instructor/Lifeguard Journeyman Electrician and Construction Manager EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: M.B.A., University of Oregon, B.S., EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: Microbiology, Oregon State University Pendleton High School Graduate; Associates Degree, Industrial Engineering, PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL Blue Mountain Community College; Electrical Supervisor’s License EXPERIENCE: Sherwood City Councilor, 2005-present. Liaison to: Cultural Arts Commission, 2008-present, Library Board, 2005-present, Senior Center, PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: Current Member of Sherwood’s 2007-present. Parks & Recreation Board, Chair, 2002-2004, Member, 1999- Parks and Recreation Board 2004.
Community Service Community Involvement: Sherwood Foundation for the Arts, Senior Center, • Volunteer assistant football coach at Sherwood High School Cruizin’, Onion Festival, Run for the Roses. Charter Member, Sherwood • Chairman of the Sherwood High School Stadium Committee YMCA, Co-President, MOMs Club Sherwood East, 2005-2006, member, • 13 years as a Sherwood youth coach. 2003-present. Nominated, Sherwood Chamber of Commerce “Citizen of the • 4 years as President of the Sherwood High School Booster Club Year”, 2008. • 2 years on the Robin Hood Festival Committee • Recipient of Six Prestigious Awards from the City, School District, State Since 1998, my family and I have enjoyed living in our great community. For of Oregon, Oregon Athletic Director’s Association, and OSAA for 3-1/2 years I’ve had the honor and pleasure of serving as a Councilor. There volunteer work. are many livability issues we have to address: traffic, road maintenance, economic development, cultural arts, and Old Town. Our LEADERS must ask Team Player difficult questions and maintain accountability. We need to listen to all I am a proven team player and the kind of person who gets things done the citizens of Sherwood. through hard work. I helped raise over a million dollars for our community and high school. The new high school stadium is a direct result of the hard My challenger was the contractor on all field lighting projects. His employee is work, commitment and determination of volunteers. I will bring that same running for Council. What do they stand for or believe in besides artificial turf determination and commitment to City Council. ($1 million/each) and lights?
Cultural Arts Is that the kind of “balanced” community we want? I worked on the Robin Hood Festival Committee to ensure the viability of Cultural Arts in Sherwood. My goals for Sherwood: • Finish Woodhaven Park, upgrade Stella Olsen Park, build a skate park The Future and Dog Park. We have accomplished much, but there is much more to be done. I believe • Fully fund the Senior Center and Library. your voice needs to be heard. I am committed to a common sense approach. • Secure a home and revenue base for Cultural Arts. I will do what is best for all of Sherwood’s citizens. I am dedicated to being • Improve local transportation. your voice to address your needs today and in the future. • Improve citizen communications and budget oversight. • Maintain our safe community by supporting our police force. Can Make Tough Decisions Making the tough decisions and taking action is a strength I can bring to City Endorsed by: Government. While I believe debate is important and necessary for the good of the whole, taking action is significant. Daniel King, City Councilor Dave Heironimus, City Councilor Vote Bill Butterfield Eugene Stewart, President, Sherwood Seniors Inc. Join me in making a difference and getting things done for our great Patti Barrow, Chair, Cultural Arts Commission community! Shelly Lamb, Member, Cultural Arts Commission Jennifer Kuiper, Vice Chair, Parks Board (This information furnished by Bill Butterfield) Pat Allen, Chair, Planning Commission Jean Lafayette, Vice Chair, Planning Commission Charles Harbick, Vice Chair, Urban Renewal Planning Advisory Committee Nancy Ellingson, Vice Chair, Library Board Irene Baker, Member, Budget Committee Odge Gribble, Old Town Arts
(This information furnished by Linda Henderson)
The above information has not been verified for accuracy by the county. The above information has not been verified for accuracy by the county. W-18 CitY of sherwooD City Council, Position 5 City Council, Position 5
Del Ross Clark Schultz
OCCUPATION: Partner, Willamette Law OCCUPATION: Small Business Owner; Group, LLC, Old Town Sherwood Retired Sherwood City Manager
OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: City Attorney Manager & Finance Director; Finance & Business Manager - Port of Portland; EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: Private Sector - Various. J.D. Willamette College of Law; LL.M in Taxation, University of Washington EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: Cal Poly - BS Business; PSU - Post PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: Graduate studies. Former President, Board Member, and current Chair of Economic Development for Sherwood Chamber; SURPAC member; Sherwood Schools PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: 7 years – City Manager; 18 years 2020 Vision Team. - Port of Portland; Proud Vietnam Veteran - US Navy; County Board of City Managers; Director – League of Oregon Cities; Member – Tualatin Valley Sherwood is approaching a defining moment in its history. Decisions made Watershed Council by City Council over the next few years will significantly impact Sherwood’s economic future. We need proactive LEADERS that can listen to and I am running for City Council because I know the needs of Sherwood and evaluate the communities’ needs without bias and devise plans that manage how to support your desire to see a balanced, sustainable community that growth, satisfy our citizens’ diverse interests and attract businesses to prospers in the coming years with well managed growth. stimulate our local economy. Experience Counts: As a Sherwood resident I have attended park meetings, school board As City Manager, I implemented Council’s goals for Sherwood. This meetings, City Council meetings and Chamber meetings. I have spoken experience will allow me to help in unique ways on City Council. I understand with business owners, coached basketball, t-ball and soccer at the YMCA, where Sherwood has been and where it can go. volunteered with Friends of the Library and for eight years, volunteered one Saturday a month to make donuts at the Rebecca Lodge. We owe it to our Vision Needed: neighbors to elect a leader to represent Sherwood’s citizens and craft a I am a strong advocate of working with our Schools. As City Manager I future that expands the opportunities for all members. I strongly believe that I worked with the District to heal a once very broken relationship. We must am that person and ask for your consideration in the upcoming election. continue our practice of joint use of City-School facilities to maximize tax dollars spent. We must work hard as a community to plan our city’s future My goals for Sherwood’s future: and what it will be. We must maximize our location in the County and State to • Complete unfinished projects: attract family wage jobs and improve transportation to and from I-5. • City Parks: Complete Snyder and Woodhaven Parks. • Old Town Streets: Finish Old Town streets, as previously approved, to We need more parks, trails and sports fields. foster economic growth. • Old School House, Robin Hood Theater and Machine Shop Properties: We need to build on the success of existing community events like Music on Develop plan to make these dormant assets active. the Green, Movies at the Park, Crusin’ Sherwood, Robin Hood Festival and • Foster partnership with Sherwood School District: Work together to assure Onion Festival. the continued quality education for our children. • Improve infrastructure to reduce congestion. Most importantly, we must keep Sherwood’s sense of community and keep • Improve fiscal responsibility and integrity. Sherwood safe.
Thank you for your consideration and I ask for your support by voting to Above all else, we need YOU, and your voice to be heard. elect Del Clark to the City Council. Vote Ross Schultz Endorsements: I need your help to ensure Sherwood stays a great City for business and the best town to live and raise a family. Debra McNab, Sherwood Business Owner Dr. Benjamin J. Aanderud, D.M.D. I am thankful for the support from so many community leaders & volunteers, Anita Colvin, Manager, U.S. Bank especially Sterling Fox and Susie Cottle. Chuck Britton, Financial Advisor Charles Harbick, Vice-Chair SURPAC (This information furnished by Ross Schultz)
(This information furnished by Delos R. Clark)
The above information has not been verified for accuracy by the county. The above information has not been verified for accuracy by the county. W-19 CitY of tUalatin City Council, Position 2 City Council, Position 2
Monique Michael Beikman Zaretsky
OCCUPATION: Homemaker OCCUPATION: Meeting and Event Planner OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: YMCA preschool teacher, substitute OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: teacher, and daycare provider. Certified Meeting Professional (CMP); Senior Tourism Executive EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: BA in Elementary Education from the EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: University of Wyoming University of Southern California, Business PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: Tualatin City Councilor, Community Action Organization Board, Core Area PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: None Parking Board, and past Tualatin Tomorrow Co-chair. • I am running to bring fiscal responsibility AND accountability to city I am proud to serve as your city councilor and it has been my pleasure in government in Tualatin. being part of a council in which has had many successes. For example, the moving of the Heritage Center, the building of the ped/bike bridge, • This fall we all face the following increases in our personal budgets – NW and drafting a new rental ordinance that all affect the livability of our great Natural 30-40%, PGE 15%, Allied Waste 10-15%. Additionally the city has community. I am asking for your vote because I am passionate about our raised water rates 21% since 2006. community and want to continue to serve our citizens.
Goals for the next four years: • In the face of these increases, the city council is asking voters to pass a 49 Communication: million dollar bond measure, with over 40 million directed towards the cost • Improve and enhance communication between the city of a gymnasium. Each property owner would face a rise in property taxes, government, its neighborhoods and citizens. every user of water in the city will face a $9.14 monthly boost in their bill, Healthy Community: and every business in Tualatin will face a monthly fee, based on their • Partner with the school district to start “Safe Routes to School” number of employees. On top of this, if a facility is ever built, users would program in our city. Explore ways to combat childhood obesity and have to pay a daily usage fee. provide healthier ways for our children to learn and grow. Parks and Recreation: • I strongly believe a municipality needs to furnish basic needs for it’s • Work on expanding our park and recreation facilities and programs citizens. That includes police, fire, water, sewer, lending libraries and the as adopted by Tualatin Tomorrow program and implement current like. I don’t feel a gymnasium fits the bill of a essential service. plans for expanding walking trails and bikeways. • The city has already spent close to $200,000 on consultants to bring this Endorsements: measure to the ballot. Tualatin Mayor Lou Ogden Chris Barhyte, Tualatin City Council • As your city councilor, I pledge to be fiscally prudent, when it comes to the Bob Boryska, Tualatin City Council expenditure of your tax dollars. I will try to keep the city government Jay Harris, Tualatin City Council focused on essential needs of the citizens of Tualatin. Robert Cornilles, CEO, Gameface, Inc. Allison Cornilles, citizen • I am asking for your vote on November 4th. Thank You. Jim Ballard M.D. Beckie Ballard, citizen • Endorsed by Donna Maddux – Tualatin City Council Neta George, citizen Dave Volz, citizen (This information furnished by Michael Zaretsky) Candice Kelly, citizen
(This information furnished by Monique Beikman)
The above information has not been verified for accuracy by the county. The above information has not been verified for accuracy by the county. W-20 CitY of tUalatin City Council, Position 4
Ed Truax
OCCUPATION: Chartered Financial Consultant
OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: Small Business Owner
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: Oregon State University, Bachelor of Science
PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: Tualatin City Council (2000 - present), Tualatin Development Commission (2000 - present), Bull Run Regional Drinking Water Agency, Tualatin Ad-Hoc Water Supply Committee, Tualatin Citizens for Safe Water, Willamette River Water Coalition, Regional Water Supply Consortium, Tualatin Basin Natural Resource Coordinating Committee, Tualatin Budget Committee.
I, my wife Nancy, and our two sons have been part of the Tualatin community for over 20 years. Our work to support Rotary, Tualatin Schoolhouse Food Pantry, Tualatin Chamber of Commerce, Oregon Dog Rescue, Tualatin Historical Society, and Friends of the Library, make a difference in the lives of many Tualatin residents.
I have worked hard the last eight years to secure high quality drinking water. I am involved in planning for our water future on a City and Regional level. I signed a new ten year agreement for Tualatin to purchase Bull Run drinking water, and we drilled our first aquifer storage and recovery well.
During my tenure we have built a new library. We have improved our parks and trail systems, enhanced our sports field inventory, created a Heritage Center, and begun the redevelopment of our downtown. Our Tualatin Tomorrow community visioning project was recognized internationally for citizen participation.
We have accomplished much in the last eight years, but much remains to be done. We must stay involved as decisions are made about the manner in which our region expands. We need a common sense approach to the redevelopment of our downtown core business district. We must continue to look for ways to protect the livability of our neighborhoods. My goal is always to do what is necessary to leave Tualatin a better place.
I am proud of what we have done together. I hope you will allow me to continue to serve on your City Council.
(This information furnished by Ed Truax, Candidate)
The above information has not been verified for accuracy by the county. W-21 CitY of tigarD City Council City Council
Marland H. Jeremy T. Henderson Vermilyea
OCCUPATION: Business Owner; General OCCUPATION: Attorney Contractor, Journeyman Carpenter; Commercial Business Park; Property OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: Management Owner, Vermilyea Law Group, Tigard, Oregon, 2007 - present; Shareholder, OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: Jordan Schrader PC, Lake Oswego, Journeyman Carpenter, General Oregon, 2000- 2007; Associate, Law Contractor Offices of Royce & Brain, Anchorage, AK, 1997-1999; Law Clerk, Alaska Court of EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: Appeals, Anchorage, AK 1996-1997 Parkrose High School, Lane Community College, University of Oregon EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: Vermont Law School, 1996; J.D. cum laude; University of Alaska Fairbanks, 1992; B.A.; Wasilla High School, Wasilla PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: City of Tigard Task Force Alaska, 1987 Committees: Water Resource; Commuter Rail; Downtown Tigard Improvement Plan; City Center Advisory Council; Washington County Behavioral Health PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: Planning Commissioner, City of Council - Chairman; Regular attendance/Testimony: Tigard City Council, Tigard, 2006-present; Alternate Planning Commissioner, City of Tigard, 2005- Metro hearings, Water Board, Fanno Creek Park & Plaza 2006
Personal: Tigard resident and property owner, 22 years. Married, Marilyn D. I am running for Tigard City Council because I am proud to live and own a Hudson, 19 years. Seven children and 9 grandchildren. business here, and I am excited about Tigard’s opportunities, and committed to helping solve its challenges in the years ahead. Memberships: Tigard Area Chamber of Commerce My priorities are: Traffic and Transportation Committee Political Action Committee 1) Address Tigard’s transportation situation, particularly on Highway 99W, Tigard Central Business District Association which is the busiest non-freeway road in Oregon; Urban Renewal Political Action Committee 2) Implement the Planning Commission’s comprehensive plan update in a National Association on Mental Illness Public Policy Committee way that addresses the needs of the business and development sectors Tigard Area Farmer’s Market - Vice President and Director (16 years) but respects Tigard’s communities and protects our environment; Washington County 4H Wagon Train Leader (16 years) 3) Move forward with the community’s vision for our downtown corridor; 4) Protect our natural environment, including working to clean up the Fanno Marland Henderson has the experience to get it done Creek corridor and other watersheds that are vital to our community; and 5) Push the development of a comprehensive plan for the Tigard Triangle Using my 22 years of community involvement experience I will focus on area. responsible management of Tigard’s resources, encourage our citizens to be involved in the process and tackle tomorrow’s challenges that come from a We must address Tigard’s transportation needs or risk permanent gridlock, more densely populated community. and we must plan for, and accommodate, significant population growth while protecting the quality of our neighborhoods and natural environment. I also MOST IMPORTANT ISSUES: believe the time has come to work to heal the scars from the Bull Mountain ---Traffic--- battles so the whole community can work together on these issues. Work inside and outside our community to improve traffic conditions ---Livability & Growth Planning--- I have been fortunate to serve the citizens of Tigard on the Planning Balance community growth and the environment Commission, and I believe I am uniquely positioned to understand these many ---Crime in Tigard--- challenges and opportunities, and to make decisions necessary to address Citizen awareness of Tigard Police Commercial Crimes Unit them. I am a pragmatist, a realist, and a consensus-builder, and I believe all More Police personnel are important qualities in a City Councilor. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION: Increase park areas (This information furnished by Jeremy T. Vermilyea) Preserve and protect our waterways Healthy wastewater management Effective city forestry plan ACCESSIBLE GOVERNMENT: Formulate a process to encourage small business growth Encourage citizen involvement and leadership, emphasizing neighborhood associations and citizen participation organizations ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: Keep local profits in the community Expansion of existing businesses including Arts and Food A VIBRANT DOWNTOWN: Finish the Tigard Downtown Improvement Plan Implement Burnham and Ash Street improvements Farmers Market to the Downtown Complete Fanno Creek Park and Plaza ACHIEVEMENTS: First Citizen of Tigard 2001 Jim Hartman Award, Leadership from the Heart 2000 ENDORSEMENT: Tom Brian, Chair, Washington County Commissioners (This information furnished by Marland H. Henderson) The above information has not been verified for accuracy by the county. The above information has not been verified for accuracy by the county. W-22 CitY of tigarD City Council
Nick Wilson
OCCUPATION: Founding principal of Atlas Landscape Architecture, a site- planning and urban design firm established in 1997.
OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: Landscape Architect, 23 years
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: Jesuit High School; University of Oregon, Bachelor of Landscape Architecture; University of Cologne, Germany, German, Economics
PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: Tigard City Councilor 2002-present; President, Tigard Planning Commission, 1993-2001; West Side Economic Alliance Board Member; Washington County Coordinating Committee; Metro Policy Advisory Committee Alternate; Washington Square Regional Center Task Force; Metro Technical Advisory Committee, Alternate; Mayor’s Blue Ribbon Committee; Tigard Development Code Update Task Force; Tigard Transportation System Plan Update Task Force; Tigard Parks Master Plan The Alternate Update Citizen Advisory Committee.
PERSONAL: Nick, a Portland area native, has lived in Tigard for 18 years. He Format Ballot (AFB) and his wife, Suni have three children.
RESULTS: Nick has been a vital member of a highly effective City Council. AFB is a voting tool which is That is why his colleagues selected him to fill a vacant council seat after his available to voters with disabili- retirement from Council at the end of 2006. Among the accomplishments during Nick’s term of service: ties. The AFB allows a voter • Restructured the city management team with disabilities to vote private- • Focused Council Goals on Highway 99 and Downtown • Implemented Urban Renewal Plan for Downtown ly and independently provided • Opened New Library the voter has access to a com- • Funded $5 million improvements to Highway 99 at Greenburg Road (available by 2011) puter with a web browser and • Established Street Maintenance Program • Secured $2.5 Million Grant for Main Street Improvements (coming in 2010) a printer. • Acquired 19 acres additional parkland and expanded greenways by 85 acres • lncreased Number of Police Officers by 12% If you wish to have more infor- • Established a Commercial Crimes Investigation Unit • Secured $176, 000 ODOT grant for Highway 99 Corridor Study to guide mation or would like to sign up future improvements to receive the AFB contact the • Secured long term water source • Balanced the Budget Annually within the existing Property Tax Base. Voter Assistance Team at 503-
GOALS: Improve Hwy 99, Revitalize Downtown 846-5800.
Keep a good thing going! Re-elect Nick Wilson! Email your request to: (This information furnished by Nick Wilson) Voter Assistance Program at [email protected] or Visit our website at: www.co.washington.or.us
The above information has not been verified for accuracy by the county. W-23 Your vote is your voice and Washington County Elections is striving to make sure each voter is “heard”.
Washington County Elections invites seniors and citizens with disabilities to use the services of a Voter Assistance Team (VAT) for the November 4, 2008 General Election.
A Voter Assistance Team will assist any voter who requests help. Assistance could include using a special ballot which allows the voter to vote privately and independently using an accessible computer. Or it could include reading the ballot to the voter, reading the Voters’ Pamphlet to the voter, and even becoming the “pencil” for the voter.
These services are available at the Washington County Elections Office through the election.
They also are available at the Charles D. Cameron Public Services Building on Monday, November 3.
Assistance provided will not include making voting decisions for the voter.
The voter must bring ballot package (ballot, secrecy envelope, and signature envelope).
Call Washington County Elections at 503.846.5800 or email [email protected] if you wish to obtain more information about these services.
W-24 The above sign signifies a Voter Assistance Team (VAT) is on site and available to provide voting assistance.
Washington County Elections Office 3700 SW Murray Blvd., Beaverton 8:30 to 5:00 Monday through Friday 9:00 to 4:00 Saturday, November 1 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM Tuesday, November 4
Charles D. Cameron Public Services Building Conference Rooms 115 and 125 155 North First Avenue, Hillsboro 9:00 to 5:00 Monday, November 3
Assistance provided will not include making voting decisions for the voter.
The voter must bring ballot package (ballot, secrecy envelope, and signature en- velope).
Call Washington County Elections at 503.846.5800 or email [email protected] if you wish to obtain more information about these services.
W-25 washington CoUntY Measure No. 34-155
• Eliminate the current requirement that a person receiving more ballot title than 50% of the vote at the primary election also appear as the only candidate on the general election ballot. GENERAL REVISION AND UPDATE OF WASHINGTON • Establish a six-month residency requirement for County COUNTY CHARTER Auditor and broaden the required professional credentials. • Require that the Sheriff be paid no less than the salary of the QUESTION: Shall 1962 Washington County Charter be generally highest paid administrative department director. revised and updated in accordance with citizen charter commit- • Repeal provisions allowing for annual cost of living increases tee recommendations? for commissioners. Set the County chair’s salary at 80% of SUMMARY: Washington County’s home rule Charter was the salary of a circuit court judge. This is the same as the adopted in 1962. Though amendments have been adopted, there existing Charter provides for the elected Auditor. District never has been a general revision. A citizen charter revision commissioners would receive 40% of the amount received committee recommended numerous substantive and housekeep- by the chair. (The charter revision committee recommended ing changes, including: these changes based on salaries in comparable governments and the increasing scope and complexity of duties as the • Remove gender references and outdated language. county grows.) • Eliminate conflicts with state law. • Enhance the authority of commissioners to adopt ordinances • Strengthen and clarify home rule authority. and otherwise act to protect property and public safety during • Require annual reports to the public on County Auditor’s declared emergencies. performance audits. • Remove language that sometimes requires a candidate filling a • Update board of commissioners’ and county vacancy to be listed twice on the election ballot. administrator’s responsibilities to reflect actual practice. • Permit County to use biannual budgeting if allowed by state • Eliminate commissioner’s annual cost of living increases. law. Set chair’s salary at 80% of circuit court judge; district • Eliminate the Land Use Advisory Committee as it was deemed commissioners at 40% of chair. to be unnecessary and outdated. (The Planning Commission • Require Sheriff to be paid at least as much as the highest reviews all land use ordinances.) administrative department director. • Impose 2-year residency requirement for commissioner If approved, these changes take effect January 1, 2009. candidates. Submitted by: • Clarify and enhance authority of commissioners to act in an Dan R. Olsen emergency. County Counsel • Remove general election requirement if candidate at primary receives more than 50% of the votes. • Clarify process for filling vacancies in elected offices. • Streamline ordinance adoption process.
If approved, the revised Charter becomes effective January 1, 2009. eXplanatorY stateMent In 1962, the voters adopted a “home rule” Charter for Washington County. Home rule means that the voters may establish the basic form and structure of county government rather than use the struc- ture provided by state statutes. Numerous separate amendments to the Charter have been approved over the years, the most recent being in 1990. There has never been a general revision to update the Charter as a whole.
In 2007, the Board of Commissioners appointed a charter revision committee. It consisted of six private citizens and one city coun- cilor. The committee was charged with identifying provisions that are confusing, conflict with state law, inefficient, inconsistent with estab- lished practice or generally in need of modernization. The committee was directed not to propose fundamental changes to the form and structure of county government. The committee held several public meetings and issued a report, including recommended language changes. The Board of Commissioners conducted a public hearing and approved the committee’s recommendations, with only a few very minor changes.
Voter approval would: • Revise language to be gender neutral, update wording, punctuation and numbering. • Clarify home rule authority to not follow state statutes when appropriate to meet local needs. Clarify that the County may not intrude on city areas of responsibility. • Require annual public reports on the County Auditor’s performance audits. • Modernize provisions relating to the authority of the county administrator to manage day to day operations. • Simplify the ordinance adoption process to reduce time and expense. no argUMents against this MeasUre • Impose a two-year residency requirement for county commissioner candidates. were fileD.
W-26 ContinUeD washington CoUntY Measure No. 34-155 argUMent for PLEASE VOTE YES ON MEASURE 34-155
In December 2007, the Washington County Board of Commissioners appointed the seven of us listed below to undertake the first general review of the county’s 45-year-old home rule charter.
As the Charter Review Committee, we met five times. Our meetings were open to the public. County Counsel advised us regarding legal matters. We received excellent information and cooperation from administrators who report to the county board and from the sheriff and auditor who are elected officials.
The changes the committee recommended, and approved by the county board, appear on the November 2008 ballot as Measure 34-155.
The Measure:
• Leaves the county government structure intact. Voters county-wide will continue to elect a county board chair, sheriff and auditor. Voters will continue to choose four commissioners from districts. All elected positions remain nonpartisan.
• Clarifies the duties and responsibilities of elected officials and administrators of county agencies. The revisions bring the charter into full compliance with Oregon laws that have changed over decades and eliminate conflicting language and references.
• Revises and clarifies the county board’s powers during emergencies when the full board is unable to meet and conduct business.
• Leaves unchanged charter mandates limiting introduction and final action on land use ordinances governing territory outside incorporated cities.
• Updates the professional requirements of the county auditor to reflect changes that have occurred in the auditing profession since the charter created the position.
• Changes the method for determining county board salaries, linking future compensation to a percentage of Oregon Circuit Count judge salaries. Existing charter language ties compensation to a cost-of living index the federal government abolished decades ago.
• We the members of the Charter Review Committee - Rece Bly, Todd Baker, Betty Bode, Harry Bodine, Erin Isselmann, John Leeper and Bob Terry - urge you to..
Vote “YES” for Measure 34-155.
(Paid for by Rece Bly, Todd Baker, Betty Bode, Harry Bodine, Erin Isselmann, John Leeper and Bob Terry).
This information furnished by: John Leeper
The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument.
W-27 washington CoUntY Measure No. 34-159 ballot title same time. • Public Open Space: Including lawns, landscaping and BONDS FOR EXHIBITION, EVENT, CONSUMER SHOW, hard surfaces. ENTERTAINMENT FACILITIES. • Site improvements: Pedestrian and bicycle circulation, parking, QUESTION: Shall Washington County issue up to $44 million of signs, related fairgrounds improvements and property purchases. general obligation bonds to develop a multi-use event center? Bond proceeds cannot be spent on operating costs. If the bonds are approved, they will be payable from taxes on property or property ownership that are not subject to the limits How much will it cost? of sections 11 and 11b, Article XI of the Oregon Constitution. The first year cost of the bonds is estimated to be approximately 6¢ SUMMARY: Bonds would finance development of a multi-use per $1000 of assessed value (this is the taxable value of property, event center and campus on the fairgrounds, near light rail. The which generally is lower than its market value). This is about $12 center will host events year round. Anticipated events include for the average homeowner in Washington County. The term of the exhibition and consumer shows including home and garden, bonds will be not more than 30 years. car, hobby, sports, antique, and trade shows; community events It is expected that these bonds will leverage City of Hillsboro funds including charitable functions, graduations, civic meetings, edu- to pay for related road improvements and a public plaza tied to the cational programs; and entertainment events including concerts, existing light rail station. family entertainment, and county fair events. Bond proceeds would be used to design, construct, equip, and furnish an event center of about 120,000 square feet, public open space, parking, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities, related Submitted by: fairgrounds improvements and related land purchases. Proceeds Dan R. Olsen are expected to leverage Hillsboro funds to pay for related road County Counsel improvements and a public plaza tied to the existing light rail sta- tion. Bond funds cannot be spent on operating costs. The estimated cost is about 6 cents per $1,000 of assessed value (not market value) in the first year. This is about $12 per year for the average home of $200,000 assessed value in Washington County. Bonds will mature in not more than 30 years. eXplanatorY stateMent
Why is a County event center proposed?
Washington County owns the 104 acre fairgrounds site located between Cornell Rd. and the Fairgrounds/Airport Light Rail station in Hillsboro. In 2007, the Board of Commissioners appointed a Fairgrounds Revitalization Task Force, consisting of citizen and business repre- sentatives from throughout the County. The Task Force was charged with recommending a plan “to ensure [the fairground’s] long term economic viability and service”, “enhance its viability for existing uses” and “identify additional uses that foster the full utilization of the site for the benefit of all citizens in Washington County.” The Task Force concluded that the existing fairgrounds is “under- utilized” and presents an opportunity to develop a center for events year-round, including: • Exhibitions: such as trade shows and traveling museum/educational exhibits • Consumer shows: such as home and garden, collectables, car, sports, antique, car, and boat shows • Civic events: such as community events, charitable functions, graduations, farmers markets, hobby clubs, and festivals • County Fair: during its annual run, and other agricultural community activities such as 4-H, and Future Farmers of America. • Entertainment: events such as rodeos, performances, and family entertainment
No major similar facility exists in Washington County. What does the ballot measure do? Approval authorizes up to $44 million in general obligation bonds to finance development of a multi-use event center, including: • Exhibit Hall: Construct, equip, and furnish an approximately 120,000 square foot building. The space would be divisible to no argUMents against this MeasUre accommodate one large event or several smaller events at the were fileD.
W-28 ContinUeD washington CoUntY Measure No. 34-159 argUMent for argUMent for Vote YES on Measure 34-159 34-159 – “Yes” to Economic Growth
Thanks to the Fairgrounds Revitalization Task Force for an Ballot Measure 34-159 will bring money into the local economy, enable Excellent Plan! the County to attract a larger, more diverse mix of conventions and festivals, and will serve as a springboard to further economic growth. In 2007, our Board appointed a 16-member Task Force representing all areas of the County, and a wide variety of interests and opinions, The new facility will produce a ripple effect that will fuel the to determine a new plan to satisfy the needs of the traditional County growth of local businesses and jobs. Fair and create a new Event Center complex to host year-round events. We owe them a big ‘thank you!’ 34-159 – “Yes” to Community Livability
Your Yes vote on Measure 34-159 will make a big difference! Measure 34-159 will allow local organizations to host events locally. Not having a year-round event center has been detrimental to - We will transform the 104 acre fairgrounds to serve year-round Washington County residents. For instance, this year the Tigard events including concerts, conferences, civic meetings, farmers High School will hold their graduation ceremony in Northeast Portland markets, festivals, trade shows and expanded county fair because Washington County lacks an appropriate venue that can activities. accommodate a gathering of that size.
- We will strengthen the local economy, creating jobs and The amount of money spent on gas to drive to one event in supporting local businesses. Portland each year is greater than the cost to each household of making this investment in our own backyard, and residents of Washington County will reap the financial benefits. - Our communities will gain the economic activity currently enjoyed by neighboring counties with modern venues. 34-159 – “Yes” to Washington County’s Future - With our own event and entertainment venue, we could say “goodbye’ to trips into Portland for exciting events (and hold Washington County has always been a special place. Ensuring a posi- graduations from Washington County schools here!). tive future for our families means we must make strategic invest- ments in our communities to invigorate economic growth. Strong public safety, quality schools and thriving cities are all a direct result of - We will have a complex to be proud of. A state-of-the-art Event an economy capable of producing the revenues necessary to meet the Center, improved parking, biking, pedestrian facilities and more needs of our citizens. green space. Measure 34-159 will establish an attractive plaza connecting the MAX rail line and the Event Center. This will connect the venue to the heart of Portland. Measure 34-159 will give us an excellent return on a modest invest- ment and is a measure of progress that will show the rest of the state that Washington County is moving forward. A great value for a small investment!
It is our enormous honor to serve the people of Washington County. Over the life of the bond, an owner of a $200,000 home will pay an average of a little over $6 a year. You would likely save more than $6 by attending one event at the Event Center rather than spending Please join us and vote “Yes” on Measure 34-159. on gas and parking at an event in Portland. Most importantly, you would join others in supporting the local economy while attend- ing great events in Washington County! Learn more: http://www. Lou Ogden, Mayor of Tualatin FairgroundsRevitalization.com/ Craig Dirksen, Mayor of Tigard Rob Drake, Mayor of Beaverton Tom Hughes, Mayor of Hillsboro Please Vote YES on Measure 34-159! Keith Mays, Mayor of Sherwood Cheri Olson, Mayor of North Plains Washington County Board of Commissioners This information furnished by: Tom Hughes Tom Brian, Chair Dick Schouten, District 1 Desari Strader, District 2 Roy Rogers, District 3 Andy Duyck, District 4
This information furnished by: Tom Brian Washington County Board of Commissioners
The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. any statement made in the argument.
W-29 washington CoUntY Measure No. 34-159 argUMent for argUMent for Measure 34-159 – Advancing our Economic Strength Support Our Schools Vote YES on Measure 34-159 The Washington County fairgrounds have served as a central venue for the entire county, hosting every type of event from sustainable liv- The Washington County Gender Equity Team, a program by PAVTEC ing expos to circuses, and car shows to the renowned Schocktober Education Consortium to give middle school girls confidence that Festival. Unfortunately, the fairgrounds have not lived up to their tre- they can succeed in math and science, used to hold its annual event mendous potential because unsuitable conditions have kept us from at the Washington County fairgrounds. But, in a matter of three years, realizing the opportunities before our eyes. 2001 to 2003, the program grew at such a rate that the current Fair Complex could no longer host the event. The program was nearly shut down, a victim of its own success, and was forced to move outside of Why renovate the fairgrounds? Washington County.
• A renovated fairgrounds means having a modern, year-round Our County lost this important event because it does not a have a qual- facility that would provide residents of Washington County with ity event center. Measure 34-159’s 120,000-square-foot Event Center a larger Event Center to attract a diverse mix of conferences would ensure that this does not happen again while drawing new edu- and events, serving as a catalyst for local economic stimulus. cational activities to Washington County.
• Further the attractive qualities of our area- our wine, The fairgrounds have hosted many other school and summer camp microbreweries, nurseries, golf and local produce are some of events, including: the best on the West Coast. On a global scale, we host corporations like Intel, Nike, Tektronix, Columbia Sportswear and newcomers, such as Genentech and SolarWorld. • Meetings for the Northwest Regional Education Service District, which serves Banks, Beaverton, Forest Grove, Gaston, Hillsboro, Sherwood and Tigard-Tualatin school districts • The revitalization project would not only provide a place for Washington County’s businesses and organizations to host events, but would bring more visitors to spend their money • Field trips to various exhibits, including the Tualatin Valley Gem right here in Washington County. Show
• Organizations can host events locally rather than in Portland, so • School activities fundraisers, such as auctions or yard sales Washington County residents can spend less time and money traveling to events and more time with their families. • Programs at the annual Fair for children in summer programs; the bus loads are constantly arriving! • By retaining our own local events and attracting additional events that would otherwise be held outside Washington County, our economy will grow, create more jobs and bring in With a modern, year-round Event Center, Washington County could additional revenue for local businesses. host:
Washington County residents who care about the economic viabil- • Oregon School Activities Association (OSAA) competitions, ity and livability of the county are excited about this plan. The including band/orchestra, choir, dance/drill, speech and debate, Washington County fairgrounds, with the proper facilities, will be a wrestling, and any other activities that require a large venue that tremendous asset to our growing communities and our future eco- isn’t necessarily a gymnasium nomic prosperity. • Graduations and proms Please join us and vote “Yes” on Measure 34-159 • Science and other fairs Submitted by: • Teacher and administration workshops and planning sessions Westside Economic Alliance • Quality fundraising auctions, dinners and events Cornelius Chamber of Commerce Forest Grove Chamber of Commerce Please support our young students and their schools, teachers Hillsboro Chamber of Commerce and administrators. Vote YES on Measure 34-159. This information furnished by: Matt Bolstad Nancy Phillips, retired teacher, Thomas Middle School
This information furnished by: Nancy Phillips
The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. any statement made in the argument.
W-30 ContinUeD washington CoUntY Measure No. 34-159 argUMent for argUMent for VOTE YES ON MEASURE 34-159! Washington County Fair Boosters have long supported the fairgrounds as the permanent home of the annual fair and for year round use of the facilities for the citizens of Washington County. The Boosters were Our Task Force was appointed to reach agreement on revitalizing the instrumental in moving and/or building most of the buildings located fair complex grounds to be a modern year-round Event Center while on the fairgrounds. For 60 years the Boosters, an Oregon Charitable improving facilities for traditional uses such as the county fair and Corporation, has continuously advocated for public access and use of Saturday markets. Despite a history of disagreement, we were able to the current fairgrounds. agree on a great design to serve the public!
The primary reasons the nearly 200 members of the Fair Boosters are Measure 34-159 will make this exciting plan a reality!.. vigorously supporting a ‘YES’ vote on this measure follow:
We owe our success largely to great public involvement and out- • This bond clearly supports the Fairgrounds Revitalization Task reach. In an award winning public process, the Task Force heard Force recently developed Master Plan with a great mix of from over a thousand citizens, and a variety of stakeholders, land facilities including a much-needed Event Center. and transportation planners, as well as financial consultants. Our • This bond will fund Phase 1 which includes the necessary members agreed unanimously: this is the best plan for the current upgrades on the fairgrounds that have long been needed by the fairgrounds site, and for our future uses. 2nd largest populated county in Oregon. • This bond is highly affordable for the citizens and will return Measure 34-159 will boost Washington County’s economy and great dividends by keeping dollars in Washington County. improve the quality of life for all of its residents through events • There is something for everyone with this Master Plan including and entertainment year-round. facilities for the annual county Fair; concerts; community gatherings; local high school graduations; home shows; conferences; youth activities including the 4-H Horse Fair, etc. • Measure 34-159 will enhance Washington County’s reputation • Passage of this bond will create new jobs both in construction as being a unique and vibrant destination to visit. As Oregon’s and later in managing this diverse array of facilities. second largest county, we need a first class Event Center • Funding this bond will protect the future of the fairgrounds and its heritage center by assuring that the 100+ acres are fully utilized. • All residents, including those of us from the “East County,” will • The process to reach this proposed bond has been inclusive, have great facilities and adequate space for local or major collaborative, thoughtful and complete and therefore has regional events, whether for business, entertainment or earned the support of both traditional and new users of the education. facilities.
• Please read the ballot summary and the other Voter’s Pamphlet Join us in voting ‘YES’ on Measure 34-159 statements for more information and opinions! Thank you. “A necessary and long overdue investment in our future” Submitted by the Fairgrounds Revitalization Task Force members:
Chair Tom Brian, Washington County Board of Commissioners Submitted on behalf of the Washington County Fair Complex Boosters Mayor Tom Hughes, City of Hillsboro Commissioner Andy Duyck, Washington County Board of Commissioners This information furnished by: Deanna Palm, Hillsboro Chamber of Commerce Lyle Spiesschaert Herb Hirst, Washington County Fair Complex Board of Directors Washington County Fair Boosters Terry Goldman, Washington County Visitors Association Dave Rohrer, Fair Boosters Tad Vanderzanden, Farm Bureau President Bob Terry, Fisher Farms Citizen members: Delna Jones, John Leeper, Tino Ornelas
Visit www.FairgroundsRevitalization.com for details on this great plan.
PLEASE JOIN US IN VOTING ‘YES’ ON MEASURE 34-159!
This information furnished by: Delna Jones Fairgrounds Revitalization Task Force
The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. any statement made in the argument.
W-31 washington CoUntY Measure No. 34-159 argUMent for argUMent for Invest in Our Neighborhoods and Communities Vote YES on 34-159 An Investment in Washington County’s Future Vote YES on Measure 34-159 Bond Measure 34-159 would create a modern event center on the fair- grounds property that would rival any venue in the area. It would put When events are lost outside our area, our communities suffer the Washington County in a position to host a wide range of events, such loss of family members travelling greater distances away for busi- as concerts, farmers markets, conferences and tradeshows. No longer ness, entertainment and education. Our County’s youth, adults and would Washington County companies and citizens, and their money, seniors are in need of a large event venue that can host the kinds of be forced to leave the County to attend events. events we are interested in. No matter what those interests may be, a 120,000-square-foot event center could host it. We could look for- ward to: Building an Event Center Would Pay Dividends to Our Communities • Business: corporate conferences and trade and consumer shows (our wineries and nurseries, Nike, Intel, Tektronix, etc.) • Voting “yes” on 34-159 would bring much needed economic activity into Washington County. Every outside dollar we bring in has a ripple effect and the economic benefit it creates far • Education: graduations, science fairs, activity fundraisers, surpasses the original spending. OSAA competitions and proms
• Voting “yes” on 34-159 would allow Washington County • Entertainment: concerts, exhibits and expanded Fair activities citizens and businesses to spend their money here, and not in Multnomah County. Our county’s winery and nursery • Community: club, civic and emergency response meetings industries, as well as Intel and Nike, are just a few prime examples of groups that would spend money hosting events in Washington County if the facilities existed. These exciting events just scratch the surface of the opportuni- ties that exist for our communities. While our graduations, corpo- rate conferences, and large entertainment functions are held in It is a common occurrence to have event hosts inquire about holding Northeast Portland, we sit on an underutilized 104-acre property events in Washington County. However, when they discover we lack that would fuel family entertainment and economic activities for modern facilities, they are forced to take their business elsewhere. It is the entire County. We have the second most populated county in time to stop turning away economic activity and entertainment. Oregon; why should over a half million people go without our own large venue? Not only would 34-159 open up a world of new possibilities, but it would also improve the traditional uses of the grounds to ensure that The proposed event center would be easily accessible across we can continue to celebrate our history for another 50 years. the region and beyond; the plan includes improved parking, biking, pedestrian facilities and a connection plaza between the MAX line Vote YES on 34-159 – it is an investment that will benefit and event center. The event center’s connection to the MAX line Washington County for generations to come would bring visitors from Portland with ease, allowing out-of-county dollars to flow into our communities without clogging highways and roads. Herb Hirst Don McCoun Kathy Christy Please join us in supporting this long-term investment in our Dan Logan area. It is a small short-term price to pay for rewards we will reap long into the future. This information furnished by: Herbert L. Hirst Vote YES on Measure 34-159
Dori of the Weese family, Tigard Chris of the West family, Sherwood Josh of the Fleming family, Sherwood Chris of the Stoner family, Wilsonville
This information furnished by: Dori Weese
The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. any statement made in the argument.
W-32 ContinUeD washington CoUntY Measure No. 34-159 argUMent for argUMent for The Farm Bureau asks you to Vote “Yes” for a Vibrant Economy and Healthy Community Please Vote YES on Measure 34-159 Measure 34-159 will benefit Oregon families, help build a stronger The Washington County Fair Complex has been an integral part of economy and develop a greater sense of community. our community for the last 57 years. The fairgrounds have served as the backbone for showcasing our County’s exceptional agricul- tural products through great events, such as the annual Fair. We are The Washington County fair complex has traditionally been the central proud of the traditional uses of the fairgrounds, yet we realize that point for events in the County–fun–filled activities for the kids, local our County is growing, as are its needs. We look forward to more merchants selling fine arts and homemade crafts, mouthwatering cui- residents taking advantage of a new and useful event center on the sine and live musical entertainment. fairgrounds. Over the years, Washington County has rapidly outgrown its fair- Measure 34-159 would not only improve on the traditional uses of grounds to the point that many local organizations and businesses the fairgrounds; it would keep this prime real estate in-step with our no longer host events in-county. For instance, PAVTEC Education growing population and economy. Consortium started a gender-equity program right here in Washington County, a program designed to show middle school girls that they can succeed in math and science. Many local businesses were involved • We have the second largest county in the state of Oregon. in the event, which was held annually at the fairgrounds. But in less On average, we gain about 1,000 residents each month. than four years the program grew to over 500 participants and the fair- grounds could no longer accommodate them. • We have renowned industries. Our wine, microbreweries, nurseries, golf and local produce are some of Measure 34-159 will not only help us retain such organizations, but the best on the West Coast. On a global scale, we host will also attract larger conventions and conferences from outside the corporations like Intel, Nike, Columbia Sportsware and County, thereby increasing the number of visitors that will spend their newcomers, such as Genentech and SolarWorld. money at our local businesses.
The residents of our County are the owners of this 104-acre property. Together, we can build a brighter future for Washington County. It is However, with this property currently under-utilized, we risk it falling one of my greatest honors to serve the people of Oregon. into private hands. Private ownership would not only take away our control of the fairgrounds, but pillage our wallets while we attempt to host and attend our events, as well as change the intent of this com- munity center. Please join me and vote “Yes” on Measure 34-159.
Keep the fairgrounds publicly owned and operated. Accommodate This information furnished by: our growing population. Show-off our exceptional industries. Representative Jeff Barker House District 28
Please vote YES on Measure 34-159
This information furnished by: Washington County Farm Bureau
The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. any statement made in the argument.
W-33 washington CoUntY Measure No. 34-159 argUMent for The Committee to Support the Fair Complex and Future Economic Development encourages you to Vote YES on Measure 34-159
It is our mission to support an economic environment conducive to growth of local business and prosperity for our citizens. It is with this goal in mind that we support Measure 34-159. A year-round, multi- use Event Center is an essential asset that will ensure Washington County’s infrastructure remains in-line with its residents’ needs. The benefits of an Event Center connected to the MAX line include:
• Large events would no longer take flight from Washington County. We could keep our events in our community, including graduations, conferences, family activities, trade and technology shows, concerts and community meetings.
• Attracting out-of-county events would bring visitors with money to spend on lodging, food and other local businesses.
• By keeping our events and money and attracting out-of-county events, our economy would grow with more jobs and revenue for local businesses.
• Our largest employers, including Nike, Intel, IBM and Tektronix, need not have their employees drive 30-miles away to events and conferences.
• Save money; with the price of gas, traveling to and parking at out-of-county venues, residents would save money by traveling to the Event Center. Further savings could be garnered by using the MAX line. These savings, coupled with the Measure’s economic boost, far outweigh the bond’s expense.
• The Event Center is an investment that will allow our economy to remain strong into the future, rather than being left behind.
These benefits would be enjoyed by all areas of Washington County including Banks, Beaverton, Cornelius, Durham, Forest Grove, Hillsboro, North Plains, Sherwood, Tigard, Tualatin and Wilsonville.
Please join us in creating jobs, stimulating local businesses, and hold- ing great events for our families.
Vote YES on Measure 34-159.
This information furnished by: Josh Fleming Committee to Support the Fair Complex and Future Economic Development
The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument.
W-34 washington CoUntY Measure No. 34-164 ballot title How will the tax be collected? New development would be required to pay the tax when a building REFERRAL OF INCREASED COUNTYWIDE permit or occupancy permit is issued. TRANSPORTATION TAX ON NEW DEVELOPMENT When would the new law take effect? QUESTION: Shall existing tax charged to developers of new projects be increased to fund road, transit improvements to If approved, the increased rates would phase in beginning July 1, handle increased traffic? 2009 with annual adjustments to approximately double the revenue SUMMARY: Increases existing transportation tax on devel- by July 1, 2012. Starting in 2013, rates may increase every year to opment of new projects. Does not impose a property tax. address inflation, not to exceed 10% per year. Certain developments Generally, increase would double current tax on development receiving final land use permits by July 1, 2009 will pay based on the of new residential projects. Tax on commercial, industrial, and existing rate structure. All other developments will be charged under other new development would increase up to 2.5 times. Tax the new rate structure. amount based on estimate of increased traffic caused by new development, but capped at no more than 2.5 times current tax. Does the TDT Affect Property Taxes? Revenue would be dedicated to road and transit projects that increase transportation system capacity within county and cit- No. The TDT is not a property tax. ies. Modifies current tax and amends county code to conform to state system development charge requirements. Provides tax What are the Major Exemptions and Credits? credits as required by statute and additional credits for trans- portation projects constructed at developer expense. Does not Remodeling, temporary uses, and development by state and federal apply to existing development. Exempts minor improvements government are exempt. Developers may receive tax credit for con- such as home remodeling. Tax increase takes effect 7/1/09; structing major road improvement at their expense. Credit is based phased in through 7/1/12. Tax may increase after 7/1/13 based on costs of the improvements with certain limitations. Credit transfers on cost index, not to exceed ten percent per year. Applies to other properties may be allowed. countywide, including inside cities. Each city may administer tax within its boundary. Submitted by: Robert Davis County Administrator eXplanatorY stateMent
What is the Transportation Development Tax?
The TDT is a charge on developers of new residential, commercial, and other projects within Washington County. It is a one-time charge on development at the time of construction to help pay for capital costs of roads and transit, to serve new development. It is a county- wide tax imposed in the county and within cities. It applies uniform rates county-wide.
What are the Changes to Existing County Law?
Washington County has had a countywide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) since voters approved it in 1990. When originally adopted, the TIF provided about one-third of the identified need; today it accounts for about 14%. From 1990 through 2007, TIF has raised about $250 million countywide for transportation projects. The measure would amend TIF, update the tax calculation, increase rates, conform to state statutes, and provide expanded credits. The revised charge would be known as the “transportation development tax” or TDT. If approved, the increased tax would approximately double current rates.
How is the Amount Determined?
TDT is based on the estimated traffic generated by each type of development on the transportation system, but no more than 2.5 times the existing TIF rate. It is designed to help fund a list of growth-related transportation projects in the county estimated to cost more than two billion dollars to construct. Independent nation- wide analysis was used to determine the estimated traffic generated by recognized categories of new development. Overall, new rates would fund an estimated 28% of listed transportation projects over twenty years. This measure will increase the rates between 1.5 and 2.5 times the existing charges.
What is the revenue used for?
All revenue would continue to be dedicated to capital improvements needed to accommodate growth. Eligible projects are major roads, including sidewalks and bike lanes, and transit capital projects. no argUMents for or against this MeasUre were fileD.
W-35 CitY of beaverton Measure No. 34-160
A yes vote means that the proposed amendment would replace ballot title the existing City charter language in Section 44 as it relates to urban renewal: retaining the voters’ right to approve the use of an urban AMENDMENT TO THE CITY CHARTER RELATING TO URBAN renewal plan and adding a requirement that an Urban Renewal Board RENEWAL. include membership beyond only that of the City Council. QUESTION: Shall Section 44 of the City Charter relating to urban renewal be amended? Submitted by: Alan A. Rappleyea SUMMARY: The Charter is the principal governing document for City Attorney the City. The proposed amendment to Section 44 of the Charter would require a simple majority vote at a May or November elec- tion in any year before approval of any urban renewal plan. The amendment would require that the board of any urban renewal agency shall have at least one member that is not a member of the City Council. The existing terms of Section 44 to be amend- ed would delete a list of projects from 1979, prohibition on any change to existing projects or any new urban renewal projects without the approval of a majority of registered voters, prohibition on the formation of an urban renewal agency without a majority vote, and list of requirements for any urban renewal plan. The proposed amendment would remove most of the existing lan- guage and simplify the public voting process for establishing an urban renewal plan. A copy of the proposed Charter amendment is available at http://www.beavertonoregon.gov and at City Hall. eXplanatorY stateMent
The Beaverton City Council is asking the voters to decide whether the City should amend its charter to modify the language regarding urban renewal. If approved, the proposed charter amendment would preserve Beaverton voters’ right to approve any urban renewal plan. The purpose of the charter amendment is to remove the existing language that refers to specific projects from the 1970’s, update the voting requirement for any urban renewal plan to require a simple majority vote of the people, and to facilitate the use of urban renewal in Beaverton. Urban renewal is not a new tax. Urban renewal and tax increment financing are methods allowed under Oregon law for local govern- ments to focus expenditures on a particular area in order to bring about public and private improvements. The public improvements may include infrastructure such as streets, roadway improvements, sidewalks, bike paths, utilities, public spaces, plazas, or parks. These public improvements would be intended to help ease congestion, improve traffic flow, create safe pathways, and stimulate private investment in the area. To use urban renewal, the city must create an urban renewal agency, and designate a particular area as an urban renewal plan area. When the property value in this area increases, the property taxes that result from the increased value, from redevelopment or new development, are used to help pay for improvements in the area based on a long-term plan. Under the proposed charter amendment, Beaverton voters would approve any urban renewal plan. While the plan is in place, the city, county, schools, and other taxing enti- ties receive the same amount of taxes they received as of the time the plan was adopted. After the plan is completed, the other taxing jurisdictions receive all of the tax revenue including taxes from the increases in value that resulted from the plan. Currently Beaverton’s charter requires that any change regarding urban renewal be passed by a majority of all registered voters, not just those participating in an election. In this case, when registered voters do not cast a ballot in an election, their votes are counted as “no”, making it difficult for citizens who do vote to approve an urban renewal plan. The proposed charter amendment would require a majority of those voting in an election to approve a plan as opposed to a majority of all registered voters. The proposed amendment also modifies the existing require- ments regarding the formation of an urban renewal agency. The amendment would require that the Urban Renewal Board shall not be exclusively made up of members of the City Council. Under state law, a board shall include at least three people. no argUMents against this MeasUre were fileD.
W-36 CitY of beaverton Measure No. 34-160 argUMent for The City Council and I are asking voters to amend our City Charter to modify the current language regarding urban renewal. The amend- ment would preserve Beaverton voters’ right to approve any future urban renewal plan. It would remove outdated language that refers to specific projects from the 1970’s.
Urban renewal will not raise taxes. It is not a new tax, but is a financing method allowed under Oregon law for local governments to focus expenditures in a defined specific area in Beaverton to help bring about public and private improvements. Specific public improvements could include infrastructure such as street and road- way improvements (to ease traffic congestion), sidewalks, bike paths, utilities, public spaces, plazas, or parks. The future plan would focus on our City core area.
The Beaverton Area Chamber of Commerce is endorsing the pro- posed Charter amendment.
“This will keep Beaverton competitive with our neighboring municipalities to further our City’s great potential. We strongly support this measure where the ultimate say to any future plan will be up to the vote of the citizens of Beaverton.” -Kevin Hohnbaum, Beaverton Chamber Board Chair
The Beaverton School District, Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue and Tualatin Hills Park & Recreation District actively participated in the formulation of this proposal and supported the referral of it to Beaverton voters.
Urban renewal is but one tool that can be utilized to promote the redevelopment of our core area. Currently, by City Charter, we’re prohibited from utilizing this method of financing. Cities such as Lake Oswego, Sherwood and Tualatin have successfully used urban renewal to help fund their downtown public infrastructure improve- ments and redevelopments. It requires voter approval of any future urban renewal plan. It helps promote open and accessible City gov- ernment.
See the City of Beaverton Voter Pamphlet for more information. Please support this proposed Charter amendment for Beaverton’s future!
Sincerely,
Rob Drake, Mayor Councilor Betty Bode Councilor Bruce Dalrymple Councilor Dennis Doyle Councilor Cathy Stanton
This information furnished by: Rob Drake, Mayor City of Beaverton
The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument.
W-37 CitY of hillsboro Measure No. 34-151 ballot title
PARKS AND RECREATION GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS QUESTION: Shall City of Hillsboro sell general obligation bonds up to $44.5 million to build recreation center and improve parks? If the bonds are approved, they will be payable from taxes on property or property ownership that are not subject to the limits of sections 11 and 11b, Article XI of the Oregon Constitution. SUMMARY: This measure would grant City authority to sell general obligation bonds up to $44.5 million. City would use bond proceeds to build an indoor recreation center and make park improvements. Recreation center is estimated to cost $39.5 million. Center would contain about 121,000 square feet at 53rd Avenue Community Park. It would include leisure pool, children’s playground, rock climbing wall, indoor soccer field, two basketball courts, fitness space, walking/jogging track, four tennis courts, wellness center, locker rooms and community rooms. Other park improvements are estimated at about $5 mil- lion. Improvements would be constructed at Turner Creek Park, Drake Lane Nature Park, Jackson Bottom Wetlands Preserve, McKinney Park, Hamby Park, Frances Street Park and the Hillsboro Pioneer Cemetery. Proposed tax is estimated at rate of $0.41 per $1,000 of assessed value in the first year. The addi- tional tax for an average Hillsboro home would be about $68 per year. The tax cost for this measure is an ESTIMATE ONLY based on the best information available from the county assessor at the time of the estimate. eXplanatorY stateMent
This measure would grant the City authority to sell general obligation bonds for up to $44.5 million. The City would use the bond proceeds to build an indoor recreation center and make improvements to sev- eral parks.
The recreation center is estimated to cost $39.5 million. The center would contain about 121,000 square feet and be located at the 53rd Avenue Community Park. It would include a leisure pool, children’s playground, rock climbing wall, indoor soccer field, two basket- ball courts, fitness space, walking/jogging track, and four tennis courts. There would also be a wellness center operated by Tuality Healthcare. The center would have a community meeting room, com- munity party rooms, locker rooms, vending space and staff office space.
The other park improvements would cost an estimated total of about $5 million. The improvements constructed would include: Turner Creek Park- park shelter, restroom building and plaza space; Drake Lane Nature Park- portion of Rock Creek Regional Trail, interpretive facilities, restrooms, shelter and plaza space; Jackson Bottom Wetlands Preserve- trail improvements and interpretive facilities; McKinney Park- water play fountain; Hamby Park- restroom and shelter renovation and walkway improvement; Frances Street Park- water play fountain; and Hillsboro Pioneer Cemetery- security lighting, fencing, signs and walkway.
The proposed property tax rate to pay for the bonds is estimated at $0.41 per $1,000 of assessed value in the first year. This would mean an additional tax for the average Hillsboro single-family home of about $68 each year. The estimated tax cost for this measure is an ESTIMATE ONLY. It is based on the best information available from the county assessor at the time of the estimate.
Submitted by: Tom Hughes, Mayor no argUMents against this MeasUre were fileD.
W-38 ContinUeD CitY of hillsboro Measure No. 34-151 argUMent for argUMent for Vote Yes for Hillsboro Neighborhood Parks and Open Spaces Now Is The Time To Improve Our Parks Vote YES on Measure 34-151 and... Vote YES on Measure 34-151 and make improvements to 7 Hillsboro Improve these city parks and open spaces parks. Act now to take advantage of temporary economic incentives and avoid dramatic cost increases. Turner Creek Park Patterson Street Nature Park Jackson Bottom Wetland Preserve Measure 34-151 provides improved access to Natural Areas and cre- Hamby Park ates a safe indoor area where Kids and Adults can exercise and social- Frances Street Park ize. McKinney Park, and Hillsboro Pioneer Cemetery When it rains, residents of Hillsboro must travel to other cities - wast- ing gas and time - to find indoor recreation. A YES vote is: The cost is about $68 per year for a home worth $350,000. Good For Hillsboro Create more ball fields and courts • Better Access To Natural Areas at Jackson Bottom Soccer Wetland Preserve Lacrosse • Helps the local economy Football • Eliminates overcrowding at Shute Park Aquatic Center Tennis, and • Provides Historic Preservation at the Pioneer Cemetary Basketball • Supports the Hillsboro 2020 Vision
The cost is about $68 per year for a home worth $350,000. Good For Kids Our kids deserve well maintained outdoor play areas and a safe place to play indoors when it rains. A YES vote makes BUILD New INDOOR... improvements at 7 Parks and creates a recreation center with Swimming Pools indoor playground. Basketball courts Tennis Courts Soccer fields Good For Health & Wellness Fitness areas A YES vote provides better access to walking trails and creates an Climbing Wall indoor center for Kids and Adults: Playground for children • New community wellness center Teen space • Indoor walking track Tuality Healthcare wellness center • Indoor Soccer, Tennis, Basketball facilities • New swimming pool
Join us: Good Stewardship Of Tax Dollars Nenice Busch Andrews, Hillsboro City Council, Aron Carleson, Measure 34-151 invests tax dollars wisely. Each delay will cost Hillsboro City Council, Doug Johnson, Hillsboro City Council, thousands of dollars in construction and materials increases. A YES Olga Acuna, Hillsboro City Council, Cynthia J. O’ Donnell, vote will: Hillsboro City Council, Ed Dennis, Hillsboro City Council • Partner with Tuality Healthcare to decrease costs • Avoid projected cost increases Vote Yes for Neighborhood Parks and Open Spaces • Use funds set aside for operation of an indoor recreation Vote YES on Measure 34-151 center
www.voteparks.org Endorsed By: Mayor Tom Hughes Dick Stenson, Gordon Faber, Want to Help?: Call Ed Dennis 503.888.1134 Pres. & CEO Tuality Healthcare Former Mayor Don R. Shannon, Owner Jerry W. Willey, Symmetry Construction Inc. This information furnished by: 2008 Mayoral Candidate Hillsboro School District Nenice Busch Andrews Board of Directors Hillsboro City Council For more information visit www.voteparks.org
This information furnished by: Sam Heiney
The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. any statement made in the argument.
W-39 CitY of hillsboro Measure No. 34-151 argUMent for argUMent for Vote YES on Measure 34-151 for Health and Wellness Coaches and Educators Support Measure 34-151
Health and wellness depend on staying active - even when it rains. We urge you to VOTE YES for Measure 34-151. Hillsboro desperately needs additional facilities for indoor sports and activities. Vote yes and Hillsboro will have: Our Pool Is Overcrowded! A YES vote will free up training space for swimmers, eliminating the • Improvements at Jackson Bottom Wetlands Preserve need to practice as early as 5:30 am on school days due to overcrowd- • New facilities for active older adults ing. Endorsed by Judy Russaw, Hillsboro High School Swim Coach • Better access to natural areas and walking spaces • Expanded opportunity for Indoor and Outdoor recreation throughout the city We Need Access To Nature For Our Well-being! • New interactive fountains and play areas for Kids A YES vote will improve access to nature education at the Jackson Bottom Wetland Preserve for after school classes, camps and out- door activities for adults and children. Endorsed by Julia Karlin, Benefits Kids & Active Older Adults Brookwood 3rd Grade Teacher and Michael Zimmerlund, Imlay Benefits from being active and healthy last a lifetime. We need indoor Elementary 5th Grade Teacher facilities for recreation and sports activites. Everyone benefits from better access to Natural Areas. We owe it to our children and our- selves to provide opportunities to stay healthy. Vote YES on Measure Soccer Continues To Grow! 34-151 The indoor soccer field will create local opportunities for classes, camps, and leagues in a controlled and safe environment - no mat- Create Partnerships For Better Health ter the weather. Endorsed by Ron Webb, Retired Athletic Director Tuality Healthcare is enthusiastic about partnering with Hillsboro Hillsboro School District Parks and Recreation to increase the opportunities for a healthier community. Voting YES will make a tremendous difference for Finding dry space for tennis is a constant battle! Hillsboro! The construction of indoor tennis courts at 53rd Avenue will provide Endosed by Cece Clitheroe Tuality Healthcare Foundation consistent, safe, sheltered year round playing space for tennis play- ers to develop their skills. Endorsed by Todd Powell, Glencoe Tennis Stay Active When It Rains! Coach and Jack Olson, Liberty Boys Tennis Coach Current facilities for indoor sporting events, walking and swimming are either inadequate or non-existent. A YES vote provides: Teens Need More Safe Places To Go! Hillsboro teens need a safe place to go for recreation, activities and • indoor Walking / Jogging Track socializing. A YES vote on Measure 34-151 provides space for youth in • indoor Pool the community. Endorsed by Vern Petrick , Retired Athletic Director • indoor Soccer Hillsboro School District • indoor Playground • indoor Tennis and Basketball The Hillsboro School District Board of Directors supports Measure 34-151 and encourages Hillsboro voters to do the same. STAY ACTIVE AND STAY HEALTHY Please vote YES VOTE YES ON 34-151
Measure 34-151 is Endorsed by: For more information visit Norman A. Levin, President of Hillsboro Senior Center www.voteparks.org Cece Clitheroe, Tuality Healthcare Foundation Richard Miller, Treasurer Hillsboro Senior Center Board Peggy Crisp, Vice Chair Hillsboro Senior Center Board This information furnished by: Edwin D. Ackerman, 1st V.P. Hillsboro Senior Center Hillsboro Committee Mike Fornshell, President Hillsboro Boys Baseball Association Michael F. Egans MD David A. Buuck, MD
For more information go to www.voteparks.org
This information furnished by: Sam Heiney
The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. any statement made in the argument.
W-40 ContinUeD CitY of north plains Measure No. 34-153 ballot title
GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND AUTHORIZATION QUESTION: Shall the City issue general obligation bonds not exceeding $1,581,000 to refinance the construction of an existing water line? If the bonds are approved, they will be payable from taxes on property or property ownership that are not subject to the limits of Section 11 and 11b, Article XI of the Oregon Constitution. SUMMARY: If approved, this measure provides funds to the City of North Plains to refinance the costs of engineering and construction of the existing water line, constructed in 2005, to connect to the Joint Water Commission facilities in Hillsboro. The water line is currently being financed by a loan from the Oregon Safe Drinking Water Program and is currently being paid from water rates. This measure would authorized the payment of the loan from property taxes instead of water rates. If the general obligation bond is not approved, the City will be required to con- tinue to pay the loan from water rates. The bonds would mature in 20 years or less from date of issuance. The City Council has determined the least costly way to repay the loan would be to issue the general obligation bonds as an additional source of repayment revenues. The City will be autho- rized to reduce the bond repayment amount from property taxes if alternative money sources - such as system development or other new development charges become available. eXplanatorY stateMent
If approved, this measure would allow the City to issue up to $1,581,000 in general obligation bonds. The funds would be used to refinance the design and construction costs for the 18,470-foot water line that connects the City water system to the Joint Water Commission transmission main line at NW Glencoe Road and NW Evergreen Road in Hillsboro. The water line was constructed with funds from an Oregon Safe Drinking Water Program Loan. The loan is currently repaid by water rate revenues. Approval of this measure would allow the loan to be repaid from property taxes instead of water rates. The terms of the loan from the Oregon Safe Drinking Water Program allow the City to repay the loan either from water rates or from gen- eral obligation bonds. If the loan is repaid from water rates, the loan requires the City hold reserve funds. This is in addition to the loan payments and causes higher water rates. If loan payments are from general obligation bond funds secured by property taxes, these reserves are not required. The allows the City to use system develop- ment charge funds on new development as well as general obligation bond to make payments, but does not allow such funds to be used with water rates. The City Council has determined the least costly way to repay the loan would be to issue general obligation bonds. This allows the City to reduce the bond repayment amount from property taxes if alter- native money sources - such as system development or other new development charges - become available. The authorized amount for the general obligation bonds is $1,581,000. The cost for a typical home with an assessed value (not market value) of $150,000 (the reported average in North Plains) would be about $145 per year or an average of $12.08 per month. This is an ESTIMATE ONLY based upon latest available information. The state loan is now being repaid from water rates. If the voters approve general obligation bonds for this purpose, the City Council will review the water rates to determine if they can be adjusted.
Submitted by: Donald H. Otterman City Manager City of North Plains no argUMents for or against this MeasUre were fileD.
W-41 CitY of north plains Measure No. 34-158 ballot title
PROPOSAL TO ANNEX 23.93 ACRES TO CITY QUESTION: Should the City of North Plains annex 23.93 acres on its north boundary? SUMMARY: Approval of this ballot measure will annex 23.93 acres to the City of North Plains. The land is all within the City Urban Growth Boundary. The land is north of the City located north of NW North Avenue and west of NW 309th Avenue. Most of the land is vacant or used for agricultural purposes. A legal description and maps of the annexation land are on file at the North Plains City Hall. Development of the area annexed shall be consistent with the Master Plan of the area prepared pursuant to the Oregon Transportation and Growth Management Program (TGM) Quick Response Project for North Plains North Expansion Area Plan. eXplanatorY stateMent
If approved, this measure would annex 23.93 acres to the City of North Plains. Most of the land is vacant or used for agricultural purposes. The City Council found that this annexation proposal meets all applicable land use legal requirements. The City Charter requires the Council to submit proposed annexations to City voters for approval.
All of the annexation land is within the City Urban Growth Boundary. The major impact of the annexation will be to shift urban planning and services responsibilities from Washington County to the City of North Plains. The annexation land would be subject to the City Comprehensive Plan and land use regulations. The land must devel- op under City requirements and in coordination with other land uses.
Development of the annexed land must be consistent with the master plan of the area prepared by the Oregon Transportation and Growth Management Program (TGM) Quick Response Project for North Plains North Expansion Area Plan.
The annexation land would be subject to City property tax rates and would increase City revenue to help finance City services. The City would also gain revenue through development and building fees.
The land proposed for annexation is north of the City located north of NW North Avenue and west of NW 309th Avenue. A legal descrip- tion and maps of the annexation land are on file at the North Plains City Hall.
Submitted by: Donald H. Otterman City Manager City of North Plains
no argUMents for this MeasUre were fileD.
W-42 ContinUeD CitY of north plains Measure No. 34-158 argUMent against argUMent against Washington County Farm Bureau Board of Directors Friends of North Plains (www.fonp.org) offers this information as part Urges a NO Vote on Measure 34-158 of our mission to educate voters about issues that affect our town.
The City Charter requires that voters approve annexations. Measure The future of agriculture in Washington County is threatened by 34-158 would permit the annexation of 23.93 acres of prime farmland loss of farmland. located north of town. Voters have already rejected this parcel three times. We believe voters should reject it again.
Washington County has some of the most productive farmland in Oregon, ranking #4 in 2007 for gross farm and ranch sales. We are North Plains currently has plenty of capacity for development. fortunate to live where farmers’ markets supply fresh, local produce, Currently, 200-225 lots are already designated for new housing in the where U-pick farms are abundant, where farmland offers scenic open City; only ONE is being built. This doesn’t include 115 new houses space and wildlife habitat. The excellent soils and mild climate in planned for the East expansion area approved in March of 2007. Washington County are ideal for hundreds of crops ranging from our highly acclaimed berries and prize-winning wine grapes to traditional Considering the current real estate crisis and building slowdown, there amber waves of grain. Yet, we are losing our prime farmland to urban is simply no need to add new land to the City now. development.
Annexing increases the population beyond citizens’ desires. The With the cities of North Plains, Banks, Hillsboro, Cornelius, and proposal would create between 100 and 120 housing units. 100 new Forest Grove all pushing for expansion, the future of agriculture in houses would mean 250 new residents - that’s a 12% increase in Washington County is threatened. Commercial agriculture must retain North Plains’ population! a base of farmland to be viable. Without a sufficient farmland base, businesses that support agriculture, such as equipment dealers, seed cleaners, and processing plants, cannot survive. Voters should be wary of promises that growth brings more commu- nity amenities “for free.” Studies show that residential developments require $1.15 in services for every $1 in taxes paid. Current residents An additional concern is the difficulty of farming next to residential pay the difference. developments due to conflicts caused by slow-moving equipment, dust, noise, and other normal farming practices. Development charges fund creation of parks and the like -- but not police, fire, libraries, or schools. But they don’t pay for maintenance - Help ensure that future generations enjoy the benefits of a thriving that requires new taxes, which all residents pay. agriculture industry in Washington County by voting NO on the North Plains annexation measure. The proposed area is prime farmland, with soil rated some of the best in the world. As transportation costs rise, it is essential that near- by productive farmland continue to be available for agriculture. Houses should be built on land less suitable for farming. Washington County Farm Bureau is part of Oregon Farm Bureau, a nonprofit organization representing nearly 45,000 members. See In 1999, the City Council ignored their own survey and approved a www.oregonfb.org for more information. Oregon Farm Bureau’s land population projection almost TWICE what most residents favored, set- use policy states, “We support the principle of land use planning for ting the stage for growth at twice the desired rate. The “20-year land the purpose of protecting the resources and the agricultural environ- supply” needs to last 40 years. There is no hurry to annex this prime ment and infrastructure needed for farmers and ranchers to produce farmland. food and fiber for current and future generations in a profitable man- ner. We are philosophically opposed to efforts to remove economi- cally productive farm and forest land from farm or forest zones.” Please Reject Measure 34-158.
This information furnished by: This information furnished by: Brian Beinlich Washington County Farm Bureau Friends of North Plains
The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. any statement made in the argument.
W-43 CitY of north plains Measure No. 34-158 argUMent against Please Vote NOPE on Measure 34-158 We Need Your Vote by November 4th. Don’t “Be Conned” by “The Beacon”
The City Council is required to put proposed annexations on the bal- lot because in both 1999 and 2002, voters approved changing the North Plains city charter to require voter approval or disapproval of each new annexation application.
North Plains voters have already rejected measures to annex this northern property. Now voters will decide again whether this property should be added to the city.
Approval of this annexation proposal would not be smart, given the current real estate crisis, the softening economy, the housing situa- tion and many foreclosures inside the city.
Consider that over 200 lots already created in subdivisions in North Plains are empty. Additionally, the 100-plus dwelling units planned for the East Property are likely two years from construction near the flood plain.
There is no need to annex this property, which would add over 100 more dwelling units. Growth costs residents and voters. There is no free lunch.
Consider more reasons to vote NOPE on Measure 34-158 • Save over 23 acres of prime farmland near the city. • Preserve the beautiful scenic views and open space from inside current city limits to Pumpkin Ridge, Dixie Mountain and the Tualatin Mountains. • Avoid population and traffic increases. • The proposal does not include “affordable housing.” Oregon land use laws specify that citizen participation is goal number 1 for planning. Now again it’s time for your vote to be counted. Your NOPE vote is critical to defeat this proposed expansion.
Plant Crops, Not Houses Please Vote NO on Measure 34-158.
Use the free, secure Official Ballot Drop-off Box (in front of City Hall) by 8pm on Tuesday November 4th, or mail in your ballot at least four days before. www.votenope.org Submitted by: Jim Long No On Proposed Expansion (NOPE) PO Box 33 North Plains, Oregon 97133-0033
This information furnished by: Jim Long No On Proposed Expansion (NOPE)
The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument.
W-44 Am I registered to vote?
Now you can check your registration online: www.oregonvotes.org
for more information about voting in Oregon call 1 866 ORE VOTE/673 8683 se habla español visit www.oregonvotes.org
TTY 1 800 735 2900 for the hearing impaired
W-45 CitY of portlanD Measure No. 26-94
voters approved in 2002. The money this levy raises can only be used ballot title for proven programs to serve children in the following areas: • Child abuse prevention and intervention: addressing RENEW FIVE-YEAR LEVY FOR CHILDREN’S INVESTMENT juvenile crime, school failure, drug and alcohol abuse and FUND homeless youth. QUESTION: Shall Portland continue supporting child abuse pre- • Early childhood programs: making childcare more affordable vention, foster children, early childhood, after school programs, and preparing children for success in school. renewing five-year levy starting 2009? • After school, summer and mentoring programs: promoting academic achievement, reducing the number of juveniles This Measure may cause property taxes to increase by more than victimized by crime and increasing graduation rates. three percent. • Children in foster care programs: helping foster children succeed who have been abused and neglected. SUMMARY: Measure would continue financing the Children’s Investment Fund to support proven programs designed to help These four areas have been chosen because they provide the great- children arrive at school ready to learn, provide safe and con- est payoff both in terms of improving children’s lives and providing structive after school alternatives for kids, help foster children long-term savings to the community. Leading economic experts and prevent child abuse, and neglect and family violence. agree that early childhood education has the highest return of any public investment - as much as $17 saved for every dollar spent. With This Children’s Investment Fund can only be used for: the average cost to jail a juvenile offender at $59,000 per year, the • Child abuse prevention and intervention: addressing Levy’s focus on helping children succeed is designed to be a prudent juvenile crime, school failure, drug and alcohol abuse and investment in our future. homeless youth. Accountability Measures • Early childhood programs: making childcare more Measure 26-94 contains several elements to ensure accountability, affordable and preparing children for success in school. efficiency and effectiveness: • After school, summer and mentoring programs: promoting academic achievement, reducing the number of juveniles • Only supports programs that are cost-effective and proven to victimized by crime and increasing graduation rates. work • Children in foster care programs: helping foster children • Oversight by a citizens committee succeed who have been abused and neglected. • Administrative expenses are limited to 5% or less. • Annual independent audits. Accountability measures include: Submitted by: • Programs funded must be cost effective and have a proven Portland City Council record of success. Mayor Tom Potter Commissioner Sam Adams • Investment fund subject to oversight by a citizen Commissioner Nick Fish Commissioner Randy Leonard committee. Commissioner Dan Saltzman • Investment fund subject to annual audits. • Administrative costs cannot exceed 5%. Levy is $0.4026 per $1000 of assessed property value, and pro- duces an estimated $14 million per year for 5 years. eXplanatorY stateMent
Renewal of the Portland Children’s Levy Measure 26-94 will renew the Portland Children’s Levy at the same tax rate that voters approved when they established the Portland Children’s Investment Fund in 2002. By renewing the Children’s Levy, Portland will continue to support the Children’s Investment Fund which funds proven programs to help kids succeed, and protect them from abuse and crime. The Portland Children’s Investment Fund supports programs for more than 15,000 children annually that might otherwise grow up without a healthy start and the positive influences that lead to suc- cess in school and beyond. The Portland Children’s Investment Fund invests only in proven, cost-effective programs that: • Ensure children are ready to learn and achieve greater academic success. This also eases the burdens on our schools and teachers because children are better prepared and there are fewer disruptive children in the classroom. • Prevent children from becoming victims of crime. The Levy supports programs that give kids safe, constructive things to do during the hours they are most at risk of getting into trouble or becoming victimized. • Protects children from child abuse and neglect. The Levy prevents and protects children from terrible circumstances, and works to eliminate the greatest risk factor for juvenile crime, drug and alcohol abuse and homeless youth. The Portland Children’s Investment Fund Measure 26-94 will renew the Portland Children’s Investment Fund no argUMents against this MeasUre through a five-year property tax levy. The rate will remain as same as were fileD.
W-46 CitY of portlanD Measure No. 26-94 argUMent for argUMent for Renew the Portland Children’s Levy A MESSAGE FROM LARRY LINNE Vote YES on Measure 26-94 2008 Child Abuse Investigator of the Year
In 2002, Portland voters made children a higher priority by establish- Measure 26-94 Will Protect our Children from Abuse ing the Portland Children’s Levy. Since then, it has funded 67 proven programs providing critically needed services to 16,000 children. A YES vote on Measure 26-94 will renew the Children’s Levy at exactly Child abuse is a tragic and pervasive problem in Portland. The Portland the same rate that we are paying now. Police and the Child Abuse Hotline collectively receive an average of over 100 calls a day concerning abuse related issues. Sadly, many more than that go unreported. Proven Programs That Make a Difference As a former Child Abuse Detective and supervisor for the Portland The Children’s Levy funds programs that are demonstrated to work in Police, I saw first hand the horrendous abuse many children in the following areas: Portland have been forced to endure. And, too often the victims did not survive - they died at the hands of their abusers. • Early childhood education. • After school and mentoring. For those children who do survive, the long term impacts of that abuse is devastating. That is why I believe we must do everything we can • Child abuse prevention and intervention. to prevent the tragic cycle of abuse from occurring before it hap- pens, and to get children in our community the resources they need to These programs have gotten results: overcome the effects of abuse and molestation when it does occur.
• Improved academic achievement In 2002 Portland supported the Children’s Levy to provide services to children when they are abused, and fund programs to intervene to • Increased school attendance prevent abuse from occurring. The Children’s Levy has successfully • Decreased behavioral problems helped reduce the incidence of child abuse in Portland, and made a • Reduced the amount of child abuse in the city huge difference in the lives of children who have been victimized. We can’t stop now.
Measure 26-94 will also fund programs to help children in foster care succeed. Children who are abused and are not provided services all too often become abusers themselves. Abused kids have an increased chance of becoming alcohol and drug users, and many become homeless. A Wise Investment Abuse not only costs the precious lives of children, it costs us, as tax- payers. Preventing abuse is far cheaper paying for the consequences of abuse. Leading economic experts agree that early childhood education has the highest return of any public investment- as much as $17 is saved for every dollar spent. The average cost to jail a juvenile offender is That is why I am urging you to Vote Yes on Measure 26-94, and $59,000 per year. This kind of early intervention will save our com- renew the Children’s Levy. Our children deserve to be protected from munity millions of dollars in the long run. Child abuse also takes a ter- the horrific effects of child abuse. rible toll on the lives of children and places a great burden on public resources. Stopping it pays dividends for all of us. Larry Linne Detective Sergeant, Child Abuse Team (retired) Citizen Oversight and Strict Accountability 2008 Child Abuse Investigator of the Year
This information furnished by: With the Portland Children’s Levy, we can have confidence that the Larry Linne money is being spent as promised. Administrative costs are capped at 5% -- in fact, over the last 5 years the administrative costs have been less than that. There is also a Citizen Advisory Committee that holds public meetings to monitor spending and evaluate program effectiveness.
Renew the Portland Children’s Levy: A great example of Portland doing things right.
VOTE YES ON MEASURE 26-94
This information furnished by: Dan Saltzman Committee For Safe and Successful Children
The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. any statement made in the argument.
W-47 CitY of tUalatin Measure No. 34-152
softball/baseball field south of the track. ballot title • Construct a new sand-based soccer field in the northern portion of Jurgens Park. TUALATIN BONDS FOR COMMUNITY CENTER, TRAILS, • Upgrade the existing North Field at Tualatin Community Park PARKS AND SPORTS FIELDS from soil base to sand base and add drain system/irrigation. • Install a Dog Park at the north end of Tualatin Community Park. QUESTION: Shall City construct a community/recreation center, trails, park improvements and sports fields by issuing In the first year of the measure’s passage, the general obliga- $49,415,000 in bonds? If the bonds are approved, they will be tion bonds would result in a maximum rate of $1.09 per $1,000 of payable from taxes on property or property ownership that are assessed value over the 20-year bond period. For a home with an not subject to the limits of sections 11 and 11b, Article XI of the assessed value of $200,000, this would result in a cost of $18.27 per Oregon Constitution. month or $219 per year. SUMMARY: The measure would fund the construction of a community/recreation center, trails, improvements to parks and Along with the proposed measure, the City would initiate a fee for sports fields. The community center would have an indoor gym the maintenance of the proposed community center and new parks with a walking and jogging track, leisure pool, weight/cardio- facilities, which would be about $9.14 per month and paid by all vascular area, aerobics, and meeting space for children, teens, households, with businesses paying a monthly fee of 65 cents per adults and seniors. Some existing parks and playgrounds would employee up to 100 employees with commercial fitness centers be upgraded. Pedestrian and bicycle trails would be expanded exempt from the fee. The Community Center would also include a in natural areas and along the Tualatin River, some connecting to user fee for programs and services. existing trails. Sports fields would be enhanced for community youth and adult use at several local schools and parks. In the first year, the approximately $49.415 million bond measure is estimated to cost $1.09 per $1,000 assessed value, with a hom- Submitted by: eowner paying about $18.27 per month on a house assessed at Sherilyn Lombos $200,000, for the 20 year bond period. City Elections Official/City Manager eXplanatorY stateMent With the passage of this bond measure, voters would direct the City of Tualatin to move forward with a long-term, sustainable parks and recreation plan for the community that would provide opportunities and programs for citizens of all ages. The proposed projects include:
Community Center • A new center would provide indoor recreation activities and a community gathering space and include a gymnasium with basketball/volleyball courts, indoor walking/jogging track, lei sure pool with 3 lap lanes, weight/cardio area, aerobics/dance area, meeting and classrooms for all ages, including children, teens, adults and seniors, senior lounge, preschool area, and arts/craft room.
Trails • Extend the Tualatin River Greenway riverside pathway to connect Brown’s Ferry Park to Tualatin Community Park by linking existing paths at 65th Avenue westward under I-5 along the river. • Construct a gravel path and wildlife viewing platform along the shoreline of the Koller Wetland Pond, and install native plants to improve water quality and wildlife habitat. • Construct a gravel path around the 108th Avenue Water Reservoir site for walking and social interaction.
Park Improvements • Renovate the existing playground surfacing and install new play ground equipment and sand wash off fountain at Atfalati Park. • Install a hard surface and terraced seating at the amphitheater at Brown’s Ferry Park to improve and extend the facility’s life. • Replace the aging playground at Lafky Park with new equipment to improve safety for children and provide accessibility to people of all abilities in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Sports fields • Upgrade the Tualatin High School Softball/Soccer soil field to all-weather artificial turf, extending the usable hours of the field. • Upgrade new Tualatin Elementary School lawn area from soil base to sand base, drain system, irrigation, pathway for walking and jogging, and drinking fountain. no argUMents against this MeasUre • Create a new sand-based soccer and football field within the existing track at Hazelbrook Middle School and new youth were fileD.
W-48 CitY of tUalatin Measure No. 34-152 argUMent for argUMent for Argument in favor of 34-152 The following proudly support Measure 34-152:
Tualatin has grown from 1,000 people 30 years ago to over 26,000 “Partnerships Building a Better Community” people today. When the city asked us what we wanted for the next 30 years, over and over we said that we need more ways to recreate - we need more walking trails; we need more sports fields for our kids; we need to keep our award-winning parks in great condition; and we need a place to go to play indoor basketball, take a yoga class, and Lou Ogden, Mayor of Tualatin let our kids go swimming when it is cold and wet outside - we need a Jay Harris, Tualatin City Council recreation center. Chris Barhyte, Tualatin City Council Tualatin Youth Basketball Association Tualatin has grown up. Grown ups take responsibility for looking Tualatin Youth Baseball ahead and making the decisions that are right for the future. Passing Lindy Y. Hughes - Tualatin Citizen this measure is the grown up thing to do. Our kids deserve sports Tualatin City Little League fields to play on. Our parents deserve a place to take an aqua aero- Tualatin Fastpitch Softball Association bics class. We deserve trails to walk on to stay fit and healthy. Our Tualatin Adult Co-Ed Softball future deserves this. Tualatin Soccer Club
This information furnished by: Thirty years from now will we look back and say, we wished we had not built a recreation center? Will we really kick ourselves for bit- Dave Cook ing the bullet and adding sports fields for our many sports leagues, YES on 34-152 youth and adult, to play on? Do we really think it will ever be any less expensive? Is it reasonable to think that there will be an abundance of land for this sometime in the future? No on all accounts. Thirty years from now we will be proud of the fact that we voted yes on Measure 34-152.
The city conducted statistically valid surveys - three of them. All three showed that a solid majority of your neighbors and mine support this. Don’t let Tualatin be left behind. Vote yes for the future.
This information furnished by: Dave Cook Chair of YES on 34-152
The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. any statement made in the argument.
W-49 Metro Measure No. 26-96
Condors ballot title Provide an on-site Condor exhibit. Protect Animal Health & Safety BONDS TO PROTECT ANIMAL HEALTH AND SAFETY; Replace the substandard 45-year old animal hospital and quarantine CONSERVE, RECYCLE WATER. buildings with facilities meeting modern standards. QUESTION: Shall Zoo protect animal health and safety; con-
serve, recycle water; issue $125 million in general obligation Save Water, Reduce Water Pollution, Improve Water Quality Since most of the zoo’s pipes, plumbing and irrigation systems also bonds; require independent audits? If the bonds are approved, date back to the 1950s and ’60s, many are outdated, leaking and well they will be payable from taxes on property or property owner- past their useful lives. The most expensive utility cost at the 55-acre ship that are not subject to the limits of Sections 11 and 11b, zoo is water, and leaking pipes, run-off, inadequate filtration systems, Article XI of the Oregon Constitution. and lack of water storage all contribute to wasting water and increas- SUMMARY: Measure will: ing costs. Replacing the sewer system and separating sewage from storm water will reduce pollution, improve water quality and save • Provide more humane care for animals: update four out costs. Adding modern water filtration and recycling systems to the dated and undersized enclosures with larger, more natural hippo and penguin pools will save over 11,000,000 gallons of water and safer spaces. every year. • Protect animal health and safety: modernize Zoo’s sub standard 45 year old animal clinic determined deficient by Cost of the Bonds the American Zoo Association. The $125 million general obligation bond measure will cost taxpay- • Increase access to conservation education: provide more ers less than 9 cents per $1,000 of assessed value per year. For the space for summer camps, classes and hands-on learning average home owner, the cost will be $1.40 per month, $16.80 per for kids, adults, and families. year. The bonds will be repaid in no more than 21 years. • Improve water quality: replace the Zoo’s 1950’s sewer
system, reducing pollution by separating sewage from storm Public Accountability Plan A citizen oversight committee will be established to periodically water, harvesting runoff for reuse. review progress on project improvements, monitor spending, and • Conserve, reuse water: install water recycling filtration consider and recommend project modifications to account for infla- systems; replace leaking, worn-out plumbing, irrigation tionary increases in construction costs. Internal audits and an inde- systems, saving 11,000,000 gallons of water annually. pendent financial audit performed annually and published in the local newspaper will maintain public accountability. Improvements will meet sustainability standards. Accountability requirements include: • Internal audits Submitted by • Annual independent financial audit published in newspaper Michael J. Jordan • Citizens’ oversight committee to monitor spending and Metro Chief Operating Officer recommend project modifications if needed
Bond cost estimate less than 9 cents per $1,000 assessed value per year. The average home owner in the region pays $1.40 a month. Bonds mature in 21 years or less. eXplanatorY stateMent The Oregon Zoo is committed to the conservation of endangered species and their habitats–both locally and around the globe–while at the same time providing adults and children with one-of-a kind recreational experiences and hands-on-learning about wildlife and conservation. It is the oldest zoo west of the Mississippi; during its 50-year history at the current location, key parts of the Zoo have become old, out- of-date and worn out. The Zoo bond measure will update and replace old exhibits and facil- ities, increase access to conservation education, and replace utility systems to reduce water and energy use and lower operating costs. More Humane Conditions for Elephants Outdoor space will increase from 1.5 to 6 acres, adding watering holes, shade structures, large trees, and boulders, providing more outside exercise and offering a more natural environment. Protecting the Health of Polar Bears Provide cooler temperatures and more humane conditions by remov- ing concrete and adding land and pool space. More Humane Enclosures for Apes and Monkeys A renovated exhibit will replace the current cage-like conditions with larger indoor and outdoor areas, adding running water and more natural conditions. Dedicated Space for Conservation Education Replace two 12 year old modular trailers, a former storage space, a basement and leased off-site space with new presentation, classes and camp space for the over 100,000 children and adults attending annually.
W-50 ContinUeD Metro Measure No. 26-96 argUMent for argUMent for ZOO VOLUNTEERS, VETERINARIANS, & BIOLOGISTS ZOO VETERINARIANS URGE YOUR SUPPORT OF ACT TO PROTECT ANIMAL HEALTH & SAFETY, MEASURE 26-96 TO PROVIDE MORE HUMANE CONDITIONS PROTECT ANIMAL HEALTH & SAFETY
When the 50-year-old Oregon Zoo started showing signs of wear- Imagine walking into a medical clinic that is cramped and small with and-tear, concerned citizens came together to form a plan. poor lighting and plumbing. The walls and doors are rusting and crum- bling, and the air ventilation system is wheezing. For the last two years the 21-member volunteer Oregon Zoo Foundation Board has worked with Zoo leadership, the Metro That’s the way the Association of Zoos (AZA) found the Zoo’s 46-year- Council, Zoo veterinarians, animal biologists and scientists, and com- old veterinary hospital and quarantine facility. munity leaders to develop a plan for the future of the Zoo. The AZA noted the Zoo’s facilities as substandard and deficient. To protect and maintain animal health and safety, maintain humane conditions, and improve conservation education, the Oregon Zoo Foundation Board is asking voters to approve the Zoo Measure Overall, the 46-year-old animal clinic and quarantine spaces are too 26-96. small, outdated and worn. They lack modern controls for minimizing disease transmission.
The Zoo Measure 26-96 will: These facilities are especially hard on large animals like zebras and giraffes. Zookeepers struggle to move large animals in and out all the • Protect animal health and safety with an updated veterinary and while trying to protect them from floors that can damage the animals’ quarantine facility. feet. • Provide more humane conditions for elephants, polar bears, monkeys and chimpanzees. • Provide more opportunities to learn about conservation. The Zoo Measure 26-96 will provide funding to meet AZA standards • Upgrade the Zoo’s 1959 water and energy systems to save by updating the veterinary and quarantine buildings to protect Zoo ani- energy and water. mals health and safety.
We believe the Zoo Measure 26-96 is critical to maintaining and Please vote Yes to Protect Animal Health & Safety improving animal health and safety. A small investment now will at the Oregon Zoo. improve animal care, conserve water and energy, and help maintain quality experiences for children and adults.
THE VOLUNTEER OREGON ZOO FOUNDATION Dr. Mitch Finnegan, Oregon MEMBERS URGE YOUR SUPPORT Zoo Veterinarian
Jon R. Kruse Kregg Hanson Barbara Cain, MS, DVM Carter MacNichol Cam Henderson Isaac Regenstreif Mark M. Loomis Brian Newman Erik Nelson Margot I Monti, CVT, Oregon Daniel Jarman Keith Parker· Zoo Veterinary Technician Cindy McPike Craig Wright, MD Michael D. Baele Penny Serrurier Pamela Leavitt Dr. Lisa Harrenstien, Oregon Timothy P. Chapman Zoo Veterinarian
This information furnished by: Ex officios: Metro Councilor Robert Liberty Jon R. Kruse Metro Councilor Carlotta Collette Oregon Zoo 2008 Campaign Tony Vecchio, Oregon Zoo Director
This information furnished by: Jon R. Kruse Oregon Zoo 2008 Campaign
The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. any statement made in the argument.
W-51 Metro Measure No. 26-96 argUMent for argUMent for A Letter From Zoo Volunteers VETERINARIANS & ZOOKEEPERS URGE MORE HUMANE CONDITIONS FOR ELEPHANTS Dear Voter: The Oregon Zoo’s largest stars have outgrown their home. Six 10,000 pound animals are squeezed into 1.5 acres. Built in 1959, the We love the Zoo. We love it so much that many of us have been Zoo elephants’ indoor and outdoor spaces are worn, cramped and out-of- volunteers for years. We do a million different things at the Zoo. Some date. of us help visitors, give tours, and teach kids. Others volunteer by preparing food for the animals, cleaning out exhibits and helping the zookeepers with the animals. Through extraordinary care, observation, and public education our Zoo has led the nation in protecting Asian elephants. We are committed to providing the best treatment possible for the animals in our care. There are over 2,000 of us volunteering 168,000 hours annually. We are one of the largest volunteer forces in the country. That’s why we’re asking for your help. Each of us knows firsthand what a great Zoo we have. As zookeepers, we are constantly learning more about the elephants’ needs. We know now just how important it is for these large animals But we also see firsthand the outdated exhibits and facilities that to explore and interact with each other and with nature. And we now need attention. know that the current facilities, both inside and outside, are simply inadequate. Over the years, we’ve seen generations of families learn about ani- mals and conservation through one-of-a-kind experiences at the Zoo. The Zoo Measure 26-96 will change that. We will be able to provide more space and improve the elephants’ habitat. The space, increased And, every day we watch a child, or an adult, discover an animal to 6 acres, will be less concrete and more natural with watering holes, they’ve only seen in a book or on television. It is always a different shade structures, large trees and boulders, and more room to roam. experience than they expected. Please help provide the elephants with more humane Your support now will help us keep a great Zoo for animals, kids, conditions by voting YES on the Zoo Measure 26-96. families and future generations. Bob Lee, Senior Elephant Keeper Oregon Zoo Please join us in supporting Measure 26-96. Ursula Buhert, DVM, PhD, Elephant Expert Judy Post, Zoo Volunteer, 22 Years Jane Duncan, Zoo Volunteer, 10 Years Dimas Dominguez, Elephant Keeper Anne Darrow, Zoo Volunteer, 9 Years Oregon Zoo Sandy Sodorff, Zoo Volunteer, 12 Years Judith Harthun, Zoo Volunteer, 1.5 Years Jeremy Kirby, Elephant Keeper Ann B. Warren, Zoo Volunteer, 4 Years Oregon Zoo Nellie Goddard, Zoo Volunteer, 1 Year Carol T. Russo, Zoo Volunteer, 1 Yr. Jeb Barsh, Elephants Harmony Stillwell, Zoo Volunteer, 3 Years Oregon Zoo Kathy Kenyon, Zoo Volunteer, 13 Years Phoebe Skinner, Zoo Volunteer, 6 Years Mike Keele, Michael D. Peden, Zoo Volunteer, 1 Year Chair of AZA Elephant Species Survival Program Renee T. Peden, Zoo Volunteer, 1 Year Roger Williams, Zoo Volunteer, 5 Yrs. This information furnished by: Pamela M. Philpot, Zoo Volunteer, 1 Year Jon R. Kruse Nancy Parr, Zoo Volunteer, 16 Years Oregon Zoo 2008 Campaign Nancy L. Gunter, Zoo Volunteer, 14 Yrs. Gail Holcomb, Zoo Volunteer, 1 Year Kim M. Voyle, Ph.D., Zoo Volunteer, 5 Yrs. Brian Averill, Zoo Volunteer, 4 Years Eric Meese, Zoo Volunteer, 21 Years Sandy Armstrong, Zoo Volunteer, 11 Years
This information furnished by: Jon R. Kruse Oregon Zoo 2008 Campaign
The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. any statement made in the argument.
W-52 ContinUeD Metro Measure No. 26-96 argUMent for argUMent for DR. MATTHEW MABERRY, An Elephant Reserve is Crucial! THE ZOO’S FIRST VETERINARIAN, SUPPORTS ZOO MEASURE 26-96 The Oregon Humane Society believes that a humanely run zoo can be a unique source for conservation and wildlife education. However, In 1962, before Packy the elephant was born, I spent three months the welfare of all zoo animals is paramount. The Oregon Zoo has an sleeping on the hay in the elephant barn waiting for the delivery. important role in our community, but many improvements are long Forty-six years ago, we were still learning about elephant care and overdue. The animals need more humane conditions and none more handling. A lot has changed since then. so than the Elephants. In all fairness we must provide substantially more room for seven elephants than the current 1.5 acres. The current elephant facilities are seriously outdated and simply unacceptable to Today, the Oregon Zoo is a national leader in Asian elephant protec- a humane community. Measure 26-96 will provide funds to quadruple tion and conservation. The elephant spaces, which were state-of-the- the elephants’ zoo exhibit space and create a more naturalized and art in 1960, we now know need to be larger for the animals’ health, stimulating setting within and outside of the zoo proper. The Oregon safety and wellbeing. Humane Society believes that the planned off-site elephant respite facility should be MEASURE 26-96’s top funding priority. If we are The Oregon Zoo’s work and reputation bring in over 1.5 million visi- to be responsible we must provide these animals with the very best tors annually. But the present facilities have aged. The veterinary accommodations. clinic and quarantine facilities are 45 years old and rated substandard by the Association of Zoos. They are outdated and risk the safety and Polar bears are also in dire need. Anyone who has witnessed the zoo health of the animals, staff and the zookeepers who care for them. polar bears’ patterns of meaningless, repetitive movements knows that it’s time to give them a more humane space in which to live. Measure The Oregon Zoo has earned a national reputation for protecting 26-96 will provide larger and more humane accommodations promot- threatened and endangered species. We have a responsibility to ing their return to more natural behavior. change and update as we learn more about the needs of the animals in our care. The Zoo Measure 26-96 provides more humane condi- Primates, too, need better living conditions. The current facility is plain, tions and better healthcare for the animals by replacing outdated sterile and unnatural. Measure 26-96 will expand the primate home exhibits and facilities. into an enriching environment as well.
The Oregon Zoo is a great zoo. I’m proud of the Zoo and its tradition These animals need our help. We must provide them with more spa- of excellent care for its animals. The Zoo measure 26-96 is the invest- cious and healthy conditions, or move them to another facility that ment necessary to protect animal health and safety and keep it a Zoo can. The current situation is unacceptable and we applaud the zoo for we can be proud of. acknowledging change is needed. Portland is one of the most humane communities in the nation its time to make a choice on the behalf of Join me in voting yes on Zoo Measure 26-96. the animals at the zoo - either fund these critical improvements or find a new home for the Elephants, Polar Bears and Primates.
Dr. Matthew Maberry Oregon Zoo Veterinarian, 1958-1973 Please, for the animals’ sake, vote YES on 26-96.
This information furnished by: This information furnished by: Jon R. Kruse Sharon Harmon Oregon Zoo 2008 Campaign Oregon Humane Society
The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. any statement made in the argument.
W-53 Metro Measure No. 26-96 argUMent for argUMent for Measure 26-96 Protects Animal Health & Safety PROTECT THE HEALTH OF POLAR BEARS Chris Pfefferkorn, General Curator, Oregon Zoo ROBERT BUCHANAN, PRESIDENT OF POLAR BEARS INTERNATIONAL Elephants: AMY CUTTING, They’re too crowded. The elephant barn is bursting at the seams and ADVISORY COUNCIL MEMBER, the outdoor space is too small. The Zoo Measure 26-96 will pro- POLAR BEARS INTERNATIONAL vide more indoor and outdoor space, more options for outside SENIOR KEEPER, NORTH AMERICA EXHIBITS OREGON ZOO access, and a more natural and stimulating environment for the elephants. DAVID SHEPHERDSON, SCIENTIST AND POLAR BEAR EXPERT Polar Bears: As the world’s largest land predators—up to 1400 pounds of pure blubber, fur, and muscle—polar bears need space, long views and cool They’re too hot. The current polar bear exhibit is a concrete bowl conditions. which reaches over 100 degrees in summer. Measure 26-96 will give the polar bears more space; chilled water; a safer, more natural habitat; and better, cooler conditions. The current polar bear exhibit is at the Oregon Zoo is a concrete bowl. Designed years ago primarily to contain the bears, it is almost entirely concrete. On the hottest summer days, the exhibit temperatures Hippos: soar above 100 degrees.
They need clean water. To protect hippos from harmful bacteria, zoo- The outdated space is not only hot, the surfaces are too hard and the keepers must drain, clean and disinfect the 36,000 gallon hippo pool pools and living space are too small. And, the space, both land and on nearly a daily basis. Measure 26-96 will install a modern water pools, do not meet standards established for zoo polar bears. filtration and more natural conditions that will keep the hippos healthy. Zookeepers have done a good job of providing enrichment for the bears, but stereotypy (a pattern of persistent fixed and repeated mind- Monkeys and Apes: less movements, such as pacing) has been observed in the Zoo’s polar bears. They need an updated home. The zoo’s primates live in one of the oldest, outdated facilities at the zoo. The exhibit is plain, sterile and The Zoo Measure 26-96 will: cage-like. Measure 26-96 will give the primates a larger, more enriching and more natural habitat. • reduce exhibit temperatures • provide a larger and more natural space, and Go to www.OregonZoo2008.com for project details. • provide a larger and cooler pool.
REPLACE OLD, WORN, OUTDATED EXHIBITS The proposed space, water quality and housing conditions will meet or TO PROTECT ANIMAL HEALTH & SAFETY exceed standards established for zoo polar bears.
Please vote YES on Zoo Measure 26-96. With more space and more natural conditions, Measure 26-96 will provide better, more humane conditions for the Oregon Zoo’s This information furnished by: polar bears. Jon R. Kruse Oregon Zoo 2008 Campaign Please VOTE Yes on Measure 26-96.
This information furnished by: Jon R. Kruse Oregon Zoo 2008 Campaign
The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. any statement made in the argument.
W-54 ContinUeD Metro Measure No. 26-96 argUMent for argUMent for After 47 years, it’s the Monkeys’ turn... WHAT DO PENGUINS & HIPPOS HAVE IN COMMON?
You know we have a great Zoo and that most of the exhibits are top They use a lot of water at the Oregon Zoo. notch. But not every exhibit is what it should be-- a few are just old and outdated. Hippos love water. They rest in the water, play in the water, sleep and eat in the water. But, to protect the hippos from harmful bacteria in the And one of the most outdated? water, the Zoo must drain, disinfect and refill the 36,000-gallon hippo pool and two holding pools nearly every day. It’s not hard to find. It is a cage, with wire mesh. Built in 1959, it is plain, sterile, and was designed primarily for keeping clean. Each year, the hippo exhibit uses nearly 6 million gallons of water.
And, it is home to some of the most intelligent and complex animals Installing a modern water filtration system at the hippo exhibit will cut at the Zoo. water usage by 80% and save 4.6 million gallons of water each year. It’s where monkeys, chimpanzees, and other primates spend a life- time. By using more natural materials and installing a water filtration system we can protect the hippo’s health, provide better conditions and save water. Although the zookeepers work tirelessly to care for these complex creatures, there’s no running water, no forest canopy, no interactions with other animals; all conditions we’ve learned make a difference for Penguins are snappy dressers, but it takes work to look that good. the animals. They need water. Lots and lots of running water: 25,000 gallons every day, seven days a week. This running water is required to keep the exhibit pool clean, reduce surface scum and protect the penguins from The Zoo Measure 26-96 provides a more humane exhibit for apes harmful bacteria. and monkeys The rebuilt exhibit would fix clogged plumbing, improve air circulation, and provide larger and more natural indoor and out- door spaces for chimpanzees, mandrills and other monkeys and The penguinarium uses 9 million gallons of water a year, but it doesn’t apes. need too. A modern filtration system that filters and recycles water for the 25,000-gallon penguin pool will reduce water usage by 80 per- cent, saving more than 7 million gallons of water a year. After 47 years, it’ is time to provide a more humane home for primates. Voting YES on Measure 26-96 will save over 11 million gallons of water a year at the Oregon Zoo. Vote YES on Zoo Measure 26-96. This information furnished by: Dave Thomas, Senior Primate Keeper Jon R. Kruse Oregon Zoo Oregon Zoo 2008 Campaign
Asaba Mukobi Oregon Zoo Primate Keeper
Tony Vecchio Former Primate Keeper
This information furnished by: Jon R. Kruse Oregon Zoo 2008 Campaign
The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. any statement made in the argument.
W-55 Metro Measure No. 26-96 argUMent for argUMent for THE OREGON LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS The Zoo is a Leader in Sustainability & SIERRA CLUB Measure 26-96 Specifies Sustainable Urge a YES vote to: and Green Practices
Reduce Water Pollution Because the Zoo cares so much about animals and their habitats we Save Water set a high standard for ourselves to reuse, recycle and reduce our Save $ impact on the environment.
The Need: Today, the Zoo:
• The Zoo’s water systems are a half-century old. • Composts most of its animal manure for use by the Zoo, Hoyt Arboretum and Washington Park in gardens and landscapes. In one year diverted 90 tons of food waste from landfills; • Water is the Zoo’s most expensive utility cost. • Reuses and recycles water for irrigation; • Monitors and manages its energy consumption; • Leaking pipes, run-off, inadequate filtration systems and lack of • Recycles construction waste, computer and copier cartridges, water storage all contribute to wasting water and increasing costs. kitchen cooking oil, electronics, polystyrene, bubble wrap and yard debris; • Encourages alternative commuting for employees. • The 1950s water system discharges storm water into the sanitary system, which not only wastes water and increases costs, but also contributes to reducing downstream water quality. All of the updates, modifications and improvements in the Zoo Measure 26-96 reflect the Zoo’s commitment to:
The Zoo Measure 26-96 will: • Protecting the environment, • Conserving water and energy, and 1. Install a sustainable/efficient water distribution system. • Applying sustainability and green business practices.
2. Install water filtration systems to save millions of gallons of Specific sustainable and green business practices in Measure 26-96 water. include:
3. Replace leaking, worn-out plumbing and irrigation systems. • Using recycled materials in walls, floors and windows. • Installing on-site energy generation (a combination of solar panels, microturbines and absorption processes) to reduce 4. Upgrade the zoo’s sewer systems, and Improve water quality by energy consumption and the Zoo’s carbon footprint. separating sewage from storm water • Modernizing its water distribution system, saving water, costs and improving water quality. The Zoo Measure 26-96 will save over 11 million gallons of water annually, provide better water conservation and improve water qual- PLEASE VOTE YES ON THE ZOO MEASURE 26-96. ity.
This information furnished by: Please join us in voting YES on Zoo Measure 26-96. Jon R. Kruse Oregon Zoo 2008 Campaign This information furnished by: Jon R. Kruse Oregon Zoo 2008 Campaign
The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. any statement made in the argument.
W-56 ContinUeD Metro Measure No. 26-96 argUMent for argUMent for THE ZOO MEASURE 26-96 PROJECT LIST KEEP THE OREGON ZOO A COMMUNITY TREASURE
• Provide more humane conditions for elephants. For over 50 years at the Oregon Zoo, generations of families have learned about animals and conservation through hands-on learning • Protect animal health and safety by modernizing the Zoo’s and recreational experiences like Packy’s birthday, Zoo keys and the substandard 46-year-old veterinary and quarantine facilities. Zoo train. Our Zoo provides thousands of kids and families with con- servation education opportunities and leads the nation in protecting • Protect the health of polar bears. threatened and endangered species like Humboldt penguins and Asian elephants. • Provide more humane enclosures for apes and monkeys. After 50 years some key exhibits and facilities are old, worn, and out- • Increase conservation education opportunities. dated. A small investment now will protect animal health and safety, provide more humane conditions and ensure that the Zoo can continue • Improve water quality, save water & energy. to provide these unique learning opportunities.
• Allow public viewing of the threatened condors. Please join us in supporting the Zoo Measure 26-96. • Save water and improve conditions for hippos. *For the full list of over 350 supporters of Zoo Measure 26-96 go to • Save water and costs at the penguinarium. www.OregonZoo2008.com All for $1.40 a month for the average homeowner. PARTIAL LIST: For more information about each project visit www.OregonZoo2008.com David Bragdon, Metro Council President This information furnished by: Sandy Armstrong Jon R. Kruse Rex Ettlin, Environmental Education Oregon Zoo 2008 Campaign Association of Oregon Joey M. Harp Travel Portland Nancy Parr Carmen Hannold Rob Drake, Mayor of Beaverton Jim Gilbert Lori Ford Kelly Vanderzanden Rick Horton Randy Leonard, Portland City Commissioner Jim Desmond Krista Swan Kathryn Harrington, Metro Councilor Keith Parker Denny Doyle, Beaverton City Councilor Kyle Chisek Lexie Harris Ann Littlewood, former zookeeper & author LIUNA LOCAL 483 Jennifer Larkin, Teacher Metro Councilor Robert Liberty Ric Barton Dick Schouten, Washington County Commissioner Portland Japanese Garden Metro Councilor Carlotta Collette Mike Keele, Packy’s former keeper
This information furnished by: Jon R. Kruse Oregon Zoo 2008 Campaign
The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. any statement made in the argument.
W-57 Metro Measure No. 26-96 argUMent for argUMent for $1.40 a month is not a lot to pay to improve the health Tough Accountability Provisions Guaranteed and living conditions of animals at the Zoo In these economic times, it’s important for taxpayers and citizens to There are many worthy measures on the ballot, but the Zoo Measure know their money is spent wisely and as promised. 26-96 will have an enormous effect at a minimal cost. The average homeowner will pay about $1.40 a month, or $16.80 a year. The Zoo Measure 26-96 requires:
Here’s what a $1.40 a month buys: • A citizens’ oversight committee will review progress on the project improvements and monitor spending. • More humane care for elephants, primates, polar bears and hippos by updating four outdated and undersized enclosures with larger, • The oversight committee will consider and recommend project modi- more natural and safer spaces. fications if inflationary increases in construction costs exceed current budget estimates. • Better animal health and safety by modernizing the Zoo’s substan- dard 46-year-old veterinary and quarantine facilities. • An independent accounting firm will perform an annual financial audit of bond spending. • More opportunities for conservation education by providing more space for summer camps, classes and hands-on learning. • The results of the annual audit will be published in local newspapers.
• Improved water quality by updating the 1950s-era sewer system. Measure 26-96 ensures our tax dollars will be spent as promised: to protect animal health and safety, provide more humane conditions and conserve water. Required Independent Oversight:
An independent citizen oversight committee will monitor spending. It deserves your support. The projects will be subject to internal audits as well as an annual independent financial audit, which will be published in the local news- Jon R. Kruse Kregg Hanson paper. Carter MacNichol Cam Henderson Isaac Regenstreif Mark M. Loomis This is an investment worth making. Brian Newman Erik Nelson Vote YES on Zoo Measure 26-96. Pamela Leavitt Keith Parker Daniel Jarman Craig Wright, MD Nancy Parr, Zoo Volunteer, 16 Years Cindy McPike Penny Serrurier Anne Darrow, Zoo Volunteer, 9 Years Michael D. Baele Sandy Sodorff, Zoo Volunteer, 12 Years Timothy P. Chapman Nancy L. Gunter, Zoo Volunteer, 14 Yrs. Sandy Armstrong, Zoo Volunteer, 11 Years Citizen Volunteers of the Oregon Zoo Foundation Board Jane Duncan, Zoo Volunteer, 10 Years Kathy Kenyon, Zoo Volunteer, 13 Years This information furnished by: Eric Meese, Zoo Volunteer, 21 Years Jon R. Kruse Judy Post, Zoo Volunteer, 22 Years Oregon Zoo 2008 Campaign
This information furnished by: Jon R. Kruse Oregon Zoo 2008 Campaign
The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. any statement made in the argument.
W-58 ContinUeD Metro Measure No. 26-96 argUMent for argUMent against Governor Kitzhaber Supports the Zoo Measure 26-96 UNREALISTIC AND UNACCOUNTABLE
Unrealistic: I was honored to serve Oregon as governor for two terms. But the best job I’ve ever had is being a dad. With all its natural treasures, • Will not come close to recreating the natural habitat and range Oregon is a wonderful place to raise a child. But another important of the elephants or polar bears. That’s not realistic at this small, Oregon treasure is the Oregon Zoo, one of the state’s great places for urban zoo (less than 1/10 the total acreage of San Diego’s Wild families, adults and kids. Animal Park (www.sandiegozoo.org)). • Even if the Zoo does not again increase the number of elephants, For years Logan and I have been regular visitors to the Zoo...we the acreage per elephant will be under 1/142 of a typical elephant started out on the Zoo train, visiting Packy, collecting Zoo keys and sanctuary (www.elephants.com). petting animals in the Zoo farm. • Twelve AZA-accredited zoos (e.g., in Detroit, San Francisco, Chicago, Sacramento and Texas) have closed or are closing their Now we’re part of the thousands of kids and families who are learn- elephant exhibits (www.savewildelephants.com). ing about wildlife and conservation through hands-on experiences at the Insect Zoo, the Butterfly Lab, Birds of Prey presentations and zoo Unaccountable: camps. • Metro admits that “key parts of the Zoo have become old, out of As important as the Zoo is to Logan and me, it also is important to date, and worn out.” Oregon. The Zoo is a leader in protecting Oregon’s threatened and • Despite this track record, the measure has no binding endangered species and habitats including native butterflies, turtles, accountability. rabbits and birds like the Condor or Thunderbird, last seen in Oregon • The citizen oversight committee will “review,” “comment” and over 100 years ago. “recommend,” i.e., have no more power than a fan in the bleachers. Our Zoo is a great Zoo, but key exhibits and facilities are worn and out of date. With a small investment now we can ensure a great Zoo for animals and future generations of Oregonians. The measure’s goal of improving conditions for the animals is laud- able. But, voting NO will help the largest animals. It will force the Zoo Let’s take care of it for our children’s sake. to be realistic and learn from its sister zoos that some of the largest animals truly do not belong in small, urban zoos. Please join me in voting Yes on the Zoo Measure 26-96.
Governor John Kitzhaber This information furnished by: John D. Vandenberg This information furnished by: Jon R. Kruse Oregon Zoo 2008 Campaign
The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. any statement made in the argument.
W-59 Metro Measure No. 26-96 argUMent against ARGUMENT AGAINST BOND 2696
Metro Bond 2696 deserves a NO vote.
The zoo claims this $125 million bond measure will provide “more humane care” for elephants and other animals. But no amount of money can buy humane care as long as the zoo:
• Uses physical punishment and force on elephants. This has led to abuse, including the vicious beating of Rose-Tu in 2000. The zoo was fined $10,000, but zoo records indicate other elephants have suffered from abuse in years since.
• Denies adequate space to elephants, earth’s largest land mammal, which naturally walks tens of miles daily. The proposed addition of a few acres to the elephant exhibit is too little to make a meaningful difference for these massive animals.
• Disrespects elephants’ strong family bonds. The zoo has separated elephant babies from their mothers and shipped them to other zoos and circuses. The zoo stated that the newest calf will also likely be sent away.
A NO Vote on Measure 2696 helps the elephants. A NO Vote holds the zoo accountable for its treatment of all animals. A NO Vote forces the zoo to commit to humane practices.
Zoo Director Tony Vecchio stated, “We don’t have humpback whales in captivity, because we can’t replicate the wild conditions.... Elephants aren’t living the same life as they would in the wild. No zoo animal is. The decision is, can we provide enough to make their lives comfortable, worthwhile, enriched?” (Willamette Week, 9/28/02)
The answer is no. As long as Oregon Zoo continues inhumane prac- tices, Portland’s elephants won’t get the quality of life they deserve.
Your NO vote tells the zoo you want a plan that reflects Portland’s progressive values and guarantees humane care and conditions for all animals. Until the zoo presents a forward-looking plan that guarantees humane care, Vote NO on Measure 2696.
For a list of zoo professionals, elephant scientists and others who are united in opposition to this bond measure, see www.helpelephants. com.
This information furnished by: Dr. Elliot M. Katz, DVM, President Matt Rossell, Director Portland Office In Defense of Animals
The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument.
W-60 ContinUeD portlanD CoMMUnitY College Measure No. 26-95
In addition, the bond would allow PCC to create college facilities in ballot title Newberg and in Sherwood. Specifically, the bond measure would fund: PORTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE BONDS TO UPDATE, EXPAND LOCAL EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES • Construction of new buildings for additional classrooms and college support services, including up-to-date instructional QUESTION: Shall PCC expand, modernize, construct facilities equipment; for additional students, programs; upgrade technology; issue • Renovation of existing PCC classrooms and facilities in need $374,000,000 in general obligation bonds; audit spending? of more efficient heating and ventilation, updated plumbing, If the bonds are approved, they will be payable from taxes on more adequate lighting, and improved roofing; property or property ownership that are not subject to the limits • Replacement of out-of-date equipment and facilities for work of sections 11 and 11b, Article XI of the Oregon Constitution. force training to meet local employers’ needs; • Expansion of health care training to Washington County; SUMMARY: If approved, measure would provide funds for addi- • Expanding educational opportunities at Southeast Center with tional classrooms and modernizing equipment at all Portland additional science labs, career-technical training facilities, Community College Campuses to expand and add programs, library and improved student services area for counseling and and accommodate more students. Increase access in Newberg, advising; Sherwood. • Expansion and updating of instructional and student support Measure would: services space in existing PCC buildings, including two libraries; • Construct, equip, furnish new buildings for additional class • Upgrading technology including record-keeping, access for rooms, other college uses at all four campuses, at students to internet and computer resources, and increasing Washington County Workforce Training Center, and in distance learning capabilities so students who work or have Newberg; difficulty commuting to campus can take courses on-line; • Renovate, update existing college facilities needing • Making health and life safety updates at college buildings heating, ventilation, plumbing, lighting, roofing; including fire alarms, security systems, and electrical wiring; • Replace out-of-date equipment, facilities for workforce • Constructing a facility in Newberg and renovating space in training; Sherwood for PCC classes; • Expand and increase efficiency of classroom, library, • Improving accessibility to PCC buildings; student support services space in existing buildings at PCC • Increasing facilities’ energy efficiency; campuses and in Sherwood; • Expanding students’ childcare facilities; • Upgrade technology including distance learning • Acquiring some land, site improvements, buildings for these capabilities; expansions of college services. • Make health, life safety, accessibility upgrades including fire alarms, security systems, electrical wiring; The Ballot Measure requires Portland Community College to conduct • Increase facilities’ energy efficiency; and issue annual audits to ensure bond funds are used as intended. • Expand students’ childcare facilities; • Acquire some land, site improvements, buildings for college The bond cost is estimated at 32.9 cents per $1,000 assessed value services; over the life of the bonds which is 21 years or less. The owner of a • Pay associated bond issuance costs. home assessed at $200,000 is estimated to pay additional $66/ year.
PCC will conduct, issue annual audits to ensure funds used as intended; Submitted by: Preston Pulliams Bond cost estimated at 32.9 cents per $1,000 of assessed value District President over 21 years or less. Portland Community College eXplanatorY stateMent
Portland Community College currently serves over one million resi- dents in five counties, covering 13 public school districts. Two-thirds of residents of the PCC District have someone in their household who has taken one or more courses at PCC. PCC offers college, and life-long learning opportunities, to people from a wide range of ages and backgrounds. It is the largest provider of vocational training in the area. However, PCC has more students applying for programs than can fit into current facilities. Programs like nursing and other health care training, as well as welding, computer education and more, are turning students away due to lack of space to accommodate them. There is high demand for even more vocational training programs that PCC cannot offer without additional space. Further, equipment on which students are trained is out of date and not up to the standards that industry and local employers need. Modernizing existing classrooms and buildings ensures program- ming and curriculum meet current and future student needs. Therefore, PCC is asking voters to consider general obligation bonds to update and renovate existing facilities, upgrade technology, and construct additional classroom space. Projects will take place at all PCC campuses and facilities including Rock Creek, Sylvania, and Cascade campuses, Southeast Center in Portland, and the Western Washington County Workforce Training Center.
W-61 portlanD CoMMUnitY College Measure No. 26-95 argUMent for argUMent for Yes for Portland Community College PCC Bond will help train more local nurses Opening Doors for More Students and a Better Economy and other needed healthcare workers
Serving over one million residents in five counties, Portland I’m a graduate of the Portland Community College Nursing School, Community College campuses and centers plays a central role in and now I work as a registered nurse at Legacy Good Samaritan our communities’ future, providing education, vocational training and Hospital. I went to PCC for retraining as a nurse after the job I had held lifelong learning opportunities. PCC helps build the well-trained work- for two decades at a printing press was replaced by a machine. force our local economy needs to create good jobs. I was fortunate to be picked for PCC’s nursing program. Every year, But the demand is greater than the college can meet because of lack PCC has to turn away hundreds of qualified people who want to of space. become nurses because it simply doesn’t have the space to train them. The year I applied, there were 918 applicants and I was one • Approximately 800 people apply annually to PCC’s nursing of only 90 chosen by lottery. program. There’s only space for 100. • Local employers need more welders and trained workers than I support the PCC Bond Measure because it will allow more stu- the college can train, due to lack of classroom space and dents to train to become nurses. outdated equipment. • More people want access to PCC - 18% enrollment growth in The PCC Bond will fund the addition of a Health Professions building the last 9 years. at the Rock Creek Campus, which will be the first nursing program located in Washington County and will allow PCC to accept twice as We need to meet these challenges today - especially given our many qualified applicants to its nursing program. tough economic times. The Bond will also expand space for allied health programs like occu- The PCC Bond Measure will: pational therapy assistant and physical therapy assistant. • Add classroom space to every campus, expanding capacity for vocational programs including welding, nursing, allied health Our community already has a nursing shortage that is affecting sciences, early childhood education, first responder training care for the sick and elderly, and demand for nurses is growing and more; as our population ages. Now is the time to invest in PCC so it can • Add and upgrade classrooms to provide new career training train the nurses we need. programs including physical therapy assisting and renewable energy technology; Please Vote Yes for the PCC Bond Measure. • Update training equipment in classrooms to prepare students for the workplace; This information furnished by: • Expand the job search program and training for dislocated Richard Lucero workers, increase classes for high school students to help PCC Nursing School Class of 2007 them prepare for the future and upgrade and expand facilities for K-12 teacher and Head Start Program training. • Increase distance learning opportunities for those who cannot always make it to campus in person.
Accountable to taxpayers: • The PCC bond is the best value on the ballot: less than $8/ month for the average homeowner; • Funds from the bond measure will be audited annually to ensure they are used appropriately, efficiently, and as voters intend.
Go to www.voteyespcc.com to see exactly how each campus and PCC center will benefit from the bond.
This information furnished by: Shannon Mills
The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. any statement made in the argument.
W-62 ContinUeD portlanD CoMMUnitY College Measure No. 26-95 argUMent for argUMent for Support Our Economy by Supporting Portland Community PCC opened the door to my future. Now, it needs our help. College Vote YES on PCC’s Bond Measure Like thousands of high school students, I got my diploma through Portland Community College. In fact, PCC is the biggest high school in the state of Oregon. I am a local manufacturer with 50 employees, including over a dozen that I’ve hired from Portland Community College, where they received I started at a local high school, but I wasn’t satisfied with my experi- their training. ence there. I wanted more academically challenging courses, and I wanted to be in classes with older students focused on a career. I The central component of our business is welding, which is a highly- found both at PCC. Now, I’m continuing at PCC, taking the prerequi- specialized skill taught at PCC. I need to hire more well-trained weld- site classes I need to enter the paramedic program. ers who are ready to work, and so do other local employers. More and more students like me are turning to PCC to finish high However, because of a lack of space, Portland Community College school and get a head start on college. However, with an 18% increase has to turn away many people who want training for careers in weld- in enrollment over the past 9 years, PCC is just out of room. ing. For example, programs like Gateway to College, which keeps at-risk They are simply out of room. And that means businesses like mine high school students in school, and the Adult High School Diploma could be out of workers. Program, which gives people a second chance to earn a high school diploma, don’t have enough space to serve all the students who want That’s why I support the PCC Bond Measure. to take courses to finish high school.
One thing the PCC Bond Measure does is allow for expansion of the I support the PCC Bond Measure because it will fund more class- welding program, by creating more classroom and welding station room space at PCC’s campuses and centers so that more high space at Rock Creek Campus and Southeast Center. school students can take advantage of the opportunities to finish high school, get vocational training, and earn college credit. The Bond Measure will also update equipment on which welding stu- dents are trained so they can begin their jobs ready to work on equip- Join me in voting Yes for PCC! ment that meets the industry standard. This information furnished by: I completed high school at PCC many years ago and then earned an Christina Lee associate degree in PCC’s mechanical engineering program. PCC PCC Student opened a lot of doors for me and was key to my success. I saw first- hand how well they provide training, and that’s why I try to employ workers out of PCC.
PCC can be the key to others’ success as well, especially if the cam- puses have enough room to train the numbers of welders needed to meet the local demand.
The PCC Bond Measure is a great value - for less than $8/month for the typical property owner, we can support this vital element of our local economy - specialized worker training.
I can’t think of a better way to support our community’s future.
Thank you,
This information furnished by: Jeff Van Raden Columbia Industries
The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. any statement made in the argument.
W-63 portlanD CoMMUnitY College Measure No. 26-95 argUMent for argUMent for A Message from PCC Faculty Members PCC helped me get retrained for a new career.
We need your help to provide a better future. Please support the PCC bond so more people get the same chance. As faculty members at Portland Community College, we work hard to provide the best training and education possible to our students. They come from every walk of life, including high schoolers, university I worked in the semiconductor industry for 20 years. A few years ago, transfer students, students seeking vocational training, and out-of- the company changed, my position disappeared and I was laid off. I work students retraining for a new career. turned to Portland Community College for help.
Now we need your help to continue doing our jobs well. We’re out Like many who need additional training and education, I went of space and our facilities and equipment need to be updated. Just back to PCC to finish my degree. some examples: PCC really cared about my success in getting retrained. My instruc- • Our nursing program can only accept 100 out of about 800 tors were impressive — really top-quality engineers who work in, and applicants each year because of lack of space; understand, the industry. I received ample attention and hands-on • We must turn away aspiring teachers seeking training because help. our early childhood education facilities are too small; • There aren’t enough welding stations to accommodate the After graduating I got a job at Intel as an Engineering Technician. Now, number of students who want training; I try to give back by also teaching part-time in the Microelectronics • Equipment in many programs is outdated compared to the Technology program at PCC. workplace; • We have no science labs in Southeast Portland. Students have PCC helps people like me get and keep good local jobs because to use the labs at a nearby high school at night, which aren’t as technology continues to advance, PCC prepares you for those equipped for college-level courses; advances. If you have this kind of education, you probably won’t be • Our dental program needs a larger clinic to give more students the one that the company lays off. hands-on experience with real patients. Now, we need to help out PCC. With the increase in enrollment and The PCC Bond will provide funds for more general-purpose class- demand for training and classes, the campuses of PCC are running out rooms and specialized classrooms for vocational training. We’ll get of space. Students who want vocational training are being turned away updated equipment, important health and safety repairs, and more from some programs due to lack of space. space for childcare for our students. These improvements will allow us to expand programs and accept more students. And, some of the equipment on which PCC instructors train the stu- dents needs to be updated. We understand that these are challenging economic times. But this is when more local residents turn to PCC for help with job placement, Please join me in voting yes for the PCC Bond Measure. retraining, and opportunities for employment. • The Bond will provide more classroom space at each campus and center. The PCC Bond Measure, at less than $8 per month for the typical • It will update training equipment. homeowner, can help more people succeed and help our economy • It will help our local economy by providing more local employers navigate through tough times. with well-trained workers.
Please Vote Yes for Portland Community College! And at less than $8 per month for the typical homeowner, it’s the best value on the ballot. Teri Mills, Nursing Sanda Williams, Electronic Engineering Technology Support good jobs and our local economy. Vote YES for Portland Christyn Dundorf, Early Childhood Education Community College! Michael Dembrow, English This information furnished by: Paul Wohr This information furnished by: Graduate of Microelectronics Technology program at PCC Christyn Dundorf
The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. any statement made in the argument.
W-64 ContinUeD portlanD CoMMUnitY College Measure No. 26-95 argUMent for argUMent for Measure 26-95 Means Critical Health and Safety Upgrades Dear Voter:
Tens of thousands of residents attend Portland Community College – When I graduated from a local high school in 2005, I didn’t think I’d maybe you’re one of them, or your child, your parent, your neighbor make it to college. I had good grades and I wanted to be an engineer, or your co-worker. but I knew my family and I couldn’t afford to pay for four years at a university. PCC cares about its students, providing top-notch vocational training and lifelong education. Then, one of my mentors suggested I look into Portland Community College. I discovered that I could go to PCC for two years to save But PCC’s buildings are aging and out-of-date. And they need money on tuition, and then transfer to a university to finish my bach- health and safety renovations to protect the students, faculty, elor’s degree. and the public’s investment in this essential community asset. Now, I’m studying electrical engineering at PCC and working part-time The PCC Bond Measure on this November’s ballot makes health and at an engineering firm in Portland. I’m getting a great education at safety upgrades to all PCC facilities, including: PCC, and my teachers give me the help I need to balance my classes, job and responsibilities at home. I’m just a few classes away from • Installation of a mass notification system to alert students and my associate’s degree, and I’m planning to transfer to Portland State staff in emergency situations University next year. • Upgrades to fire and intrusion alarm systems to enhance student and staff safety As a student, I see every day the effects of the shortage of classroom • Renovation of parking lots and walkway lighting to enhance and lab space. Last fall, there were over 5,000 students on waiting lists safety who couldn’t get into the classes they needed! • Electrical upgrades to maintain safety • Boiler replacements to improve efficiency and maintain safety I’m supporting PCC’s Bond Measure because it will fund new class- • Storm water management to prevent runoff in creeks close to rooms so PCC can offer more of the classes that are in high demand. campuses That means fewer students on waiting lists, and more opportunities for • Updating of water system to ensure uninterrupted service students to get the credits we need to transfer to a university. • Repair and upgrade of solar panels to produce more energy at lower cost And that will make a tremendous difference in the lives of thou- • Plumbing upgrades to prevent leakage sands of people and families throughout the five counties that • Enhancement of computer security systems to protect student PCC serves - people just like me. and staff information • Replacement and/or improvement of multiple building roofs This information furnished by: • Upgrades to make facilities safer and more accessible to Ricardo Garcia students with disabilities PCC Student
The PCC Bond - Measure #26-95 - is the best value on the ballot: for less than $8 a month for the typical homeowner, we can support PCC’s buildings, students, faculty – and our community’s future!
Vote YES for PCC.
This information furnished by: Shannon Mills
The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. any statement made in the argument.
W-65 portlanD CoMMUnitY College Measure No. 26-95 argUMent for argUMent for A message from the Halton Family, owners of Halton Co., a local Vote Yes for the 2008 PCC Bond Measure employer: The right investment. The right time.
The PCC Bond will help train more people for local jobs. What do we get by passing the PCC Bond Measure? More space. More programs. Updated facilities for students. A better future for all We own the Halton Co, your Caterpillar dealer for Northwest Oregon of us. and Southwest Washington, and we are proud to be a longtime part- ner of Portland Community College. With expansion and updating at every campus and center, here’s how Washington County will benefit from Bond funds: PCC is providing a skilled workforce for the jobs of today and the jobs of the future. Halton and PCC work closely with one another to Rock Creek Campus equip Oregonians with the skills they need. One example is PCC’s Diesel Service Technology program, from which we hire many techni- • Add space and training equipment to offer the first nursing cians. program located in Washington County • Add facilities to offer occupational therapy assistant and Halton and PCC have so much in common. We both build a stronger physical therapy assistant programs Oregon. Halton does it through powerful equipment and engines. • Add general purpose classroom space to offer more high- PCC does it by growing and developing people. Halton products demand classes and reduce the number of students put on touch every member of the community, from the roads you drive on waiting lists and the food you eat, to the roof over your head. PCC enables people • Update facilities for welding, auto collision repair, diesel repair to realize their dreams and careers. and building construction technology to meet HVAC and health and safety standards The PCC bond measure on the November ballot will allow the • Expand child-care facility for students college to expand and offer more partnerships with industry lead- • Modernize arts facilities ers, creating the kinds of well-paying jobs that allow Oregonians • Make renovations that make access to student support services to raise families and buy homes: skilled jobs such as diesel tech- more convenient for students, including advising, counseling, nicians, nurses and teachers. and admissions
PCC’s measure would: Willow Creek Center • Help the college to train the workforce of today and of the Hillsboro future. • Help the college to serve more students throughout the district. • Located on the Max transit line in Hillsboro, this is the new • Help the college provide state-of the art training equipment so location for the Washington County Workforce Training Center that students are prepared for the workplace. • Provide job search and assistance services for the unemployed • Include space to offer allied health care and first responder PCC serves more students than all seven of the Oregon University training System schools combined. By helping Oregonians achieve an afford- • Open a GED testing facility able education, PCC contributes to everyone’s quality of life. And through its wide array of partnerships with business and industry, Sherwood PCC is an economic boon to the entire region. • Space for PCC classes within an existing facility, to be upgraded I urge you to vote “Yes!” on PCC’s ballot measure 26-95. using bond funds • Offer college-level English, math and social science courses This information furnished by: • Offer vocational training opportunities tailored to requests from Halton Family local employers and students Owners, Halton Co. • Offer small business development services
This information furnished by: Shannon Mills
The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. any statement made in the argument.
W-66 portlanD CoMMUnitY College Measure No. 26-95 argUMent against PCC AIDS AND ABETS ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION
PCC gives illegal aliens seeking admission the same consider- ation it gives U.S. citizens. And it admits those illegal aliens at in-state tuition rates. Before the college asks taxpayers tor more money, this must end.
• By admitting illegal aliens, PCC aids and abets a federal crime. This encourages more of that crime, and undermines respect for Americans’ most precious inheritance - the rule of law.
• Competition is fierce for slots in many PCC programs. In one recent quarter, PCC’s nursing program saw 900 applicants for 90 slots. PCC Communities magazine reports that PCC’s welding pro- gram “has a waiting list of more than 100 potential students” and that its Rock Creek campus “still has waiting lists for many classes and programs.”
With so many of our own people in need of vocational training, it is immoral for PCC to force citizens to compete for admission with illegal aliens.
• PCC forces citizens to subsidize illegal aliens’ in-state tuition.
PCC’s in-state tuition is $70 per credit hour; its out-of-state tuition, $198. If, at those rates, over the course of the 20-year bond measure a mere 350 illegal aliens enrolled every quarter for 10 cred- its, the college would lose $35,840,000 it would have collected had those illegal aliens paid the out-of-state rate. By itself, this is almost one-tenth the amount the PCC bond measure seeks from tax- payers.
And who would subsidize the shortfall? The very property own- ers PCC’s bond measure is targeting for higher taxes.
• Like all American institutions, PCC’s first and foremost responsibility is to U.S. citizens. But when PCC admits an illegal alien over a citizen, it abdicates that responsibility - and renders citizenship meaningless.
Before asking taxpayers for more money, PCC’s publicly-elected board of directors must enact a policy requiring applicants for admis- sion to prove citizenship or legal residence.
Vote no on the PCC bond measure.
This information furnished by: Richard F. LaMountain Oregonians for Immigration Reform
The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument.
W-67 tUalatin hills park & reCreation Measure No. 34-156
• Multi-field/multi-purpose synthetic athletic field and youth athletic ballot title field development throughout the District. • Park facility replacements throughout the District, including play BONDS TO PRESERVE NATURAL AREAS, WATER, IMPROVE equipment, bridges and boardwalks, irrigation systems, pedestrian PARKS, CREATE TRAILS pathways and trails, and permeable parking lots. QUESTION: Shall Park District protect local natural areas and • Existing facility safety and seismic structural upgrades to facilities water quality; improve parks; create trails; issue $100 million gen- throughout the District for the mitigation of structural and seismic eral obligation bonds? risks. If the bonds are approved, they will be payable from taxes on • Existing facility expansion and improvements to the Elsie Stuhr property or property ownership that are not subject to the limits Center for fitness room and parking expansion; the Conestoga of sections 11 and 11b, Article XI of the Oregon Constitution. Recreation and Aquatic Center for classroom, locker room, SUMMARY: This measure directs Tualatin Hills Park & Recreation parking expansion and the addition of a splash pad; the Aloha District to buy and restore natural areas for the protection of Swim Center, for the creation of ADA/family dressing rooms; and water quality and fish and wildlife habitat, improve existing parks the HMT Recreation Complex for ADA/family dressing rooms in and facilities and purchase and develop new parks. Proceeds the aquatic center and HVAC improvements in the athletic center. would be used to purchase land for new trails and trail con- • ADA/access improvements to the HMT Recreation Complex for nections. It would establish a citizen oversight committee and parking and drop-off zones at the aquatic and athletic centers, as require a yearly independent financial audit. Bonds would well as park sites throughout the District. mature up to 21 years from date of issuance and could be issued in more than one series. Approval of the measure would provide • Creation of outdoor splash pad at Cedar Hills Park. funds for the District to: • Acquire land for a future community center in the southwest • Preserve local natural areas quadrant of the District. • Preserve and restore lands near creeks and streams for the • The creation of a citizen advisory committee and yearly protection of local water quality and fish and wildlife habitat independent financial audits. • Build new trail connections and purchase land to create new local trails If this Measure is approved the estimated additional cost to property • Improve existing local neighborhood and community parks, owners would be an average of 37 cents per $1,000 of assessed including sports fields and play equipment valuation per year over the life of the bonds. For the average hom- • Purchase and develop land for new local neighborhood and eowner, the additional monthly cost would be about $5.86 per month. community parks • Improve, expand, and renovate certain existing local facilities, including safety and seismic structural upgrades This information furnished by: • Create ADA improvements Larry Pelatt Board of Directors President eXplanatorY stateMent
$100 Million General Obligation Bond Measure to Fund Protection of Local Natural Areas and Water Quality, Improve and Create Local Parks, and Create New Local Trails With passage of the Bond Measure, voters would direct Tualatin Hills Park & Recreation District to protect local natural areas and lands near creeks and streams throughout the District, safeguard water quality and protect fish and wildlife habitat. Approval of the measure would also allow the District to improve and create local neighbor- hood and community parks, and new local trails and trail connec- tions. The $100 million general obligation bond measure would fund: • Natural area preservation through land acquisition and restoration work on wetlands, woods, and greenways throughout the District. • Water quality protection through land acquisition and restoration work on wetlands, woods, and greenways throughout the District, protecting water quality and fish and wildlife habitat. • New linear park and trail development and land acquisition throughout the District. • New neighborhood and community park development throughout the District, including: land acquisition for new park sites, new play equipment, picnic areas, pathways, drinking fountains, benches, open grass areas, outdoor sport courts, and multipurpose sports fields. • Existing neighborhood and community park renovation and redevelopment throughout the District, including: relocation or replacement of play equipment, ADA-specific upgrades, renovation of existing picnic and shelter areas, addition or relocation of pathways, renovation or addition of outdoor sport courts or multipurpose sports fields, renovation or relocation of parking, and the addition of community gardens. no argUMents against this MeasUre were fileD.
W-68 ContinUeD tUalatin hills park & reCreation Measure No. 34-156 argUMent for argUMent for There are a lot of worthy measures on the ballot. VOTE YES ON MEASURE 34-156:
Here is why Measure 34-156 is different. A Measure for us ALL!
We live in a special place, with a connection to nature that other plac- Being the largest park and recreation district in Oregon, Tualatin Hills es have lost - if they ever had it at all. Our natural areas, streams and Park and Recreation District does not always have easy choices to parks are right here, helping define a quality of life that we treasure as make. With roughly 100,000 people expected to move into the District a heritage. over the next 20 years, those choices of where to spend money become even more difficult. But that heritage is not guaranteed. We are growing fast, and that growth poses great challenges to the things we love about our part of However, the projects that Measure 34-156 will fund were chosen Oregon. by you- residents from every age range, residents from all over the District, residents from all walks of life. Protecting our water, our land, our access to healthy recreation, and our way of life is a choice that we must make. The THPRD That’s why Measure 34-156 has over 60 projects in it- projects in Connecting People, Parks and Nature Measure stands alone as a every corner of the District; projects for our senior population, for chance to protect the very place we live. And it is a smart, afford- our youth population, and for everyone in-between. New neighbor- able and accountable way to do it. hood parks. New community parks. Natural area preservation. Trail improvements. New trails and trail connectors. In Every Quadrant. Here is what Measure 34-156 will do: Whether it is improvements to Rock Creek Powerline Park so that our • Preserve natural areas throughout the District. less-able-bodied neighbors can enjoy the park, or structural upgrades to the Garden Home Recreation Center; whether it is natural area pres- • Protect and restore creeks and streams to improve water ervation at the Jenkins Estate, or youth athletic field development at quality. Cedar Mill Park, Measure 34-156 benefits ALL of us.
• Protect natural areas and habitat for fish and wildlife. VOTE YES ON MEASURE 34-156
• Improve and complete neighborhood park and trail projects. CONNECTING PEOPLE, PARKS AND NATURE...FOR EVERYONE
• Replace and upgrade park facilities, including play structures. This information furnished by: Joshua Alpert • Create new youth athletic fields in underserved areas. YES on Measure 34-156: Connecting People, Parks and Nature • Add synthetic turf surfaces serving multiple fields and sports.
• Expand building facilities to address growing needs for services.
• Improve safety and earthquake stability at certain facilities.
And Measure 34-156 creates a very high standard of account- ability:
• A citizen advisory committee will oversee the program.
• Measure 34-156 funds are subject to annual audits.
And what will protecting all this cost?
Less than $6 per month for the average household.
This is an investment worth making. And it is one that we would regret not making years from now.
Yes on 34-156. It’s about where we live. And who we are.
This information furnished by: Joshua Alpert YES on Measure 34-156: Connecting People, Parks and Nature
The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. any statement made in the argument.
W-69 tUalatin hills park & reCreation Measure No. 34-156 argUMent for argUMent for PROTECT STREAMS, CREEKS, NATURAL AREAS, FISH & A VOTE FOR MEASURE 34-156 IS A VOTE FOR THE THINGS THAT MAKE OUR WILDLIFE HABITAT COMMUNITY A GREAT PLACE TO LIVE.
Join The Audubon Society of Portland, Tualatin Riverkeepers, Measure 34-156 is a great step forward for our community- it’s about putting all the Urban Greenspaces Institute, and The Trust for Public Land in pieces together: Nature. Recreation. Health. Sports. Safety. Fun. supporting Measure 34-156 Measure 34-156 will help connect people with nature by preserving and increasing access to natural areas, protecting water quality and helping pass on a legacy to our Measure 34-156 is our opportunity to preserve our region’s quality children and grandchildren. of life and natural beauty as we grow...and to ensure that our children and grandchildren will be able to enjoy the same quality of life we do. Measure 34-156 will develop new youth athletic fields in underserved communities, giving EVERY child a chance to shine on the field for generations to come: A Plan to Manage Growth A.M. Kennedy Park The THPRD region will likely add over 100,000 people in the next Barsotti Park 20 years. Measure 34-156 helps plan for this growth and reduce Cedar Mill Park its impact by protecting land that might otherwise be threatened by Meadow Waye development. SW Community Park Winkleman Park And a new youth field in EVERY quadrant of the District Now is the time to pass this measure - if we don’t act, more critically important natural areas and fish and wildlife habitat will be lost for- Measure 34-156 will develop and improve multi-field/multi-purpose synthetic turf ever as our region continues to grow. fields at two sites fast-growing beyond capacity: Measure 34-156 will protect lands that are ecologically valuable for Cedar Hills Park fish and wildlife habitats, that are instrumental in improving our SW Community Park water quality, and that preserve our quality of life. Measure 34-156 will upgrade or expand swim and senior centers to make them safer, Preserving Clean Water nicer and less congested: Aloha Swim Center Maintaining and improving water quality in the region’s wetlands and Beaverton Swim Center stream corridors is essential to our quality of life. This bond measure Elsie Stuhr Center will allow THPRD to acquire land around headwaters and surrounding HMT Recreation Complex upland forests, purchase wetlands and stream corridors, provide res- Sunset Swim Center toration and long-term stewardship, and re-grade streams and water Conestoga Recreation and Aquatic Center flows. All of this extremely vital work will improve our water qual- ity, protect our wildlife, and control erosion. Measure 34-156 will build two new splash parks for our children of ALL ages to enjoy: Cedar Hills Park Conestoga Recreation and Aquatic Center Whether your interest is in playing softball or swimming, hiking or working out, having For clean water today and a legacy we can be proud of, fun with your family or simply enjoying the natural heritage that makes our part of Oregon We hope you join us in VOTING YES ON 34-156. so special, Measure 34-156 will make it easier and more enjoyable for you to do so. This information furnished by: PLEASE HELP US MAKE OUR COMMUNITY AN EVEN BETTER PLACE TO Meryl Redisch LIVE BY VOTING “YES” ON MEASURE 34-156! Audubon Society of Portland Roni Illias Alan Hodgson Larry Pelatt Rebecca J. Dawson Kevin Meader Katelyn Grant Lisa Hunt Gregory Guth Richard C. Trout Chantelle Rein Matthew E. Smith Paul A. Leonard Josh Knowlton Jodi Moore Michael R. Moore Dena Sims April Rule Joe Vincent Marrie Vincent Scott Allison Yuvonne Bellmer The Tualatin Hills Park Foundation
This information furnished by: Joshua Alpert YES on Measure 34-156: Connecting People, Parks and Nature
The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. any statement made in the argument.
W-70 ContinUeD tUalatin hills park & reCreation Measure No. 34-156 argUMent for argUMent for VOTE YES ON MEASURE 34-156: Local Businesses And The Chamber of Commerce Support Measure 34-156 PEACE OF MIND FOR OUR COMMUNITY As local business owners who work in Washington County, and as a As a life-long law enforcement official, I know that providing our business association with members throughout Washington County, children with safe and enjoyable places to play is instrumental in we urge you to join us in voting YES on Measure 34-156. achieving the quality of life we strive for. That’s why I enthusiastically support Measure 34-156. We know that protecting our clean water, natural areas and fish and wildlife habitat is essential to maintaining a healthy local economy and It’s clear that money invested into parks, playgrounds and rec- attracting and retaining a quality workforce. reational facilities results in less money spent on incarcerating convicted kids. Measure 34-156 provides for safe and healthy alter- And we understand that in order to retain our workforce, it’s vital that natives for ALL of our children- whether it be biking on new trails or our neighborhoods offer amenities that allow our employees and playing soccer on a new soccer field- in EVERY corner of the District. their families ways to relax and blow off steam after a long workday. Measure 34-156 will create more access to recreation by creating And not only will greater access to parks, playground and recreational new youth athletic fields in underserved areas throughout the District, facilities keep more of our children out of trouble, it will provide them by developing new trails and trail connectors, by expanding buildings with ways to become and stay healthy. Measure 34-156 promotes in order to accommodate more users, by improving existing parks, and active living by making healthy activities available to everyone by creating new ones. throughout the District. New trails and improvements to existing ones. Trail connections allowing our children to get out of the car Additionally, we know the value in accountability. Measure 34-156 and on their feet. New synthetic turf fields serving multiple sports. meets our standards by including tough accountability provisions Additional youth athletic fields in underserved areas. to ensure the money is spent as promised, including annual audits and citizen oversight. And with money from Measure 34-156 being used to improve safety and earthquake stability at certain facilities throughout the District, We believe that Measure 34-156, costing the average homeowner less you can breathe easier when your children want to go swim or play than $6.00 a month- less than a cup of coffee per week- will go a long basketball, knowing that the buildings are structurally safe and way in helping us attract and retain a strong, vibrant workforce. secure. Please join us in VOTING YES on Measure 34-156. At less than $6 a month, Measure 34-156 is a small price to pay for a big investment in our kids’ future. That’s why it is vital that you vote The Bike Gallery YES on Measure 34-156. Safety. Health. Peace of mind. Gretchen Vadnais Landscape Architects, LLC Chuck Wilson, Beaverton Sub Station VOTE YES ON MEASURE 34-156! Falk Ace Hardware, Inc. Pacific Western Machinery, Inc. David G. Bishop, Chief of Police, Beaverton, Oregon Beaverton Area Chamber of Commerce
This information furnished by: This information furnished by: Joshua Alpert Joshua Alpert YES on Measure 34-156: YES on Measure 34-156: Connecting People, Parks & Nature Connecting People, Parks and Nature
The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. any statement made in the argument.
W-71 tUalatin hills park & reCreation Measure No. 34-156 argUMent for argUMent for FOR BETTER HEALTH...SUPPORT MEASURE 34-156. NATURAL AREAS, PARKS, STREAMS AND RECREATION ADD VALUE TO OUR HOMES, BUSINESSES, AND COMMUNITIES. Physical inactivity and poor diet are responsible for an estimated THAT IS WHY THE PORTLAND METRO HOME BUILDERS 400,000 deaths annually from coronary heart disease, colon cancer, ASSOCIATION SUPPORTS MEASURE 34-156 stroke, and diabetes. Alarmingly, the latest Trust for America’s Health report on obesity found that adult obesity rates are rising in 37 states. As home builders who work across the District, we are committed to In Oregon, obesity rates have increased significantly each of the preserving and enhancing the District’s quality of life. Measure 34-156 last three years and the state’s adult obesity rate has now reached helps create stronger communities and helps protect the environment the 25%. Physical inactivity is a major cause of rising obesity rates. as we grow. That’s why we urge you to join us in supporting this mea- According to Centers for Disease Control statistics, the annual esti- sure. For a great quality of life, we need thriving businesses, a vibrant mated direct medical cost of physical inactivity in 2000 was $76.6 community, and a healthy environment. billion. In 2003, Oregonians paid more than $781 million in medical costs related to obesity. Measure 34-156 is good for our economy.
Measure 34-156 will help reduce the health risks and costs asso- Our region’s natural beauty provides an economic advantage over ciated with obesity by promoting active living through improved other communities. Our economic growth has been defined not just by access to neighborhood parks, athletic fields and trails close to what we have developed, but also by what we have chosen not to home. By improving and completing neighborhood and community develop. Measure 34-156 will helps the region keep its economic edge parks, athletic fields, and trails throughout the District - from the by protecting the rivers and streams, natural areas and parklands that Rock Creek Trail to the Westside Trail and 14 other trails in between add value to our homes and business. - Measure 34-156 creates new opportunities for exercise and a healthier lifestyle while improving our communities. Measure 34-156 will make our communities even better places to live and work. And by protecting natural areas and land along creeks and streams, Measure 34-156 will help secure for future generations the clean air Measure 34-156 will add to our quality of life by improving access to and water essential for good health. parks and preserving natural areas to enjoy near our neighborhoods. It will create new places for our children to play, to explore, and to learn. Please vote YES on Measure 34-156. At less than $6 per month for the average homeowner, we American Heart Association/American Stroke Association can all have a part in preserving and enhancing our quality Judith Richmond, M.D. of life. Lisa Frazzitta, RN Adriane Gladstone, RN Join Us in Voting YES on Measure 34-156! Laura Dahl, MD Jay S. Rosenbloom, M.D., Ph.D This information furnished by: Jim McCauley This information furnished by: Homebuilders Association Joshua Alpert Metro Portland YES on Measure 34-156: Connecting People, Parks and Nature
The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. any statement made in the argument.
W-72 ContinUeD tUalatin hills park & reCreation Measure No. 34-156 argUMent for argUMent for Our children. Our families. Our friends. And our neighbors. They all A LEGACY FOR OUR GRANDCHILDREN have one thing in common - a desire to live active, healthy lives. That’s one reason why we choose to live within The Tualatin Hills Park As grandparents, we often worry about the kind of Oregon that our and Recreation District. THPRD makes it easy for us to accomplish grandchildren will inherit. Measure 34-156 will allow our grandkids this goal. to grow up in the kind of Oregon that we grew up in - a beautiful and healthy community. Now THPRD needs OUR help to ensure that ALL THPRD USERS have access to safe, healthy places for recreation. This means Every day we see more and more people moving in to the neighbor- new and improved athletic fields in at least 12 parks throughout hood, and we try to be good neighbors. But we can’t help but think the District. This means adding play equipment in parks across the that with all of these new people, we are not going to have any more District for our children to enjoy. And this means purchasing land to places for our grandchildren to explore and play in. develop new trails and trail connections throughout the District. Measure 34-156 solves that problem by preserving land not just As trails supporters, we are interested in not only having serene for our grandchildren, but for ALL of our grandchildren. Not only places to walk, hike and bike through, but safe connections that that, but Measure 34-156 will create new parks and trails, allowing keep us and our children off the road and away from cars and families to spend more time together hiking, biking, and enjoying the trucks. Measure 34-156 will provide work on 16 trails, including the things that have made Oregon special to us. And Measure 34-156 will completion of a north-south trail that will run through the heart of result in a healthier environment for us, for our families, and for the District, connecting the Waterhouse Trail to the Westside Trail. future generations by protecting and improving our creeks and Additionally, Measure 34-156 will complete the Rock Creek Trail, streams. which connects to the Waterhouse/Westside Trail. These connections will truly bring the District closer together. What’s more, Measure 34-156 costs less than $6 a month, which for us is very important. As the cost of nearly everything keeps going up, we From Cedar Hills Park to Winkleman Park. And from Somerset West are faced with tough choices. But because Measure 34-156 costs so Park to A.M. Kennedy Park, Measure 34-156 will allow ALL THPRD little, we don’t have to choose between being responsible grandpar- users to achieve the goal of living active, healthy lives. And for ents and cutting back on other necessities. less than $6 a month- the cost of one lunch- that’s a bargain. And because the funds raised from Measure 34-156 will have a citizen Safety. Accessibility. Good health and active living. That’s what oversight committee and an independent audit to make sure that Measure 34-156 means to us, and that’s why we support it. We urge the money is being used correctly, we don’t have to worry that politi- you to join us in supporting Measure 34-156. cians will squander our hard-earned dollars.
Kevin Apperson, Trails Advisory Committee Member Please join us in voting YES on Measure 34-156. Let’s give our kids Andy Brandt, Trails Supporter and grandkids the Oregon that we got to grow up in; an Oregon Dave Brown, Trails Supporter that we can ALL be proud of. Mary O’Donnell, Trails Supporter S. Alison Rhea, Trails Supporter Norman Vaillancourt Elizabeth Zeller, Trails Supporter Bill Kroger Wendy Kroger This information furnished by: Joshua Alpert This information furnished by: YES on Measure 34-156: Joshua Alpert Connecting People, Parks and Nature YES on Measure 34-156: Connecting People, Parks and Nature
The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. any statement made in the argument.
W-73 tUalatin hills park & reCreation Measure No. 34-156 argUMent for The Bicycle Transportation Alliance strongly encourages voters in the Tualatin Hills Park and Recreation District to vote yes on Ballot Measure 34-156: Bonds to preserve natural areas, water, improve parks and create trails.
This bond measure substantially increases the opportunities for active transportation in Washington County by building critical links in non-motorized transportation corridors. Active transportation has multiple benefits:
Mobility • Building more roads alone does not significantly mitigate congestion. • Active transportation can carry a significant part of the transportation load. • Nearly half of all trips in the United States are three miles or less.
Public Health • The obesity epidemic results in 300,000 annual deaths and $117 billion health-related expenses. • Experts recommend 30 minutes of moderate physical activity five days a week. • Integrating exercise into daily trips is an easy way to meet this requirement.
Economic Development • Trails consistently increase property values along their corridors. • Trails are the top community amenity potential homebuyers seek in a new neighborhood. • With car ownership being the second largest expenditure for the average American household, driving less can free up substantial resources for other needs.
Climate • Automobiles account for 30% of Oregon’s energy-related C02 emissions. • Automobile emissions are rising due to more people and more miles driven per car. • Walking and biking yield greater C02 reductions than other popular solutions like hybrid cars.
Family and Community • Build community by connecting residential, commercial, educational, recreational, and other assets via trails. • Provide safe places free of traffic for children and others to bicycle. • Improve equity by providing accessible transportation choices for children, the elderly, disabled populations and low-income groups.
The Bicycle Transportation Alliance is a statewide non-profit organi- zation that works to open minds and roads to bicycling. We represent bicyclists and the bicycle industry with over 5000 members in Oregon and SW Washington, and have seventeen years of experience in bicycle engineering, planning, education and advocacy.
This information furnished by: Scott Bricker Bicycle Transportation Alliance
The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument.
W-74 CorneliUs rUral fire Measure No. 34-161 ballot title
REPLACEMENT FIVE-YEAR LOCAL OPTION TAX FOR OPERATIONS QUESTION: Shall the Cornelius Rural Fire Protection District levy $97,500.00 per year for five years for operations beginning Fiscal Year 2009-2010? This measure may cause property taxes to increase more than three percent. SUMMARY: This measure replaces the current levy that expires with the 2008-2009 Fiscal Year. That levy was $115,000.00 per year. The proposed new levy is a reduction to $97,500.00 per year. Over its five-year life this levy would raise $487,500.00. This is a reduction of $17,500 per year. The Cornelius Rural Fire Protection District has a permanent tax rate of $.6164 which does not generate sufficient revenues to cover the fire district contract for emergency services with the city of Cornelius. The levy approved in 2004 funded the dis- trict’s shortfall for the past five years. The proposed replacement levy will fund the district’s shortfall for the next five years. This levy allows continuation of current services. The new reduced replacement levy will first be levied for Fiscal Year 2009-2010. eXplanatorY stateMent This ballot measure asks the voters of the Cornelius Rural Fire Protection District to approve a five-year local option ad valorem property tax levy. This raises funds required to meet a contractual agreement for emergency services provided by the City of Cornelius to the Cornelius Rural Fire Protection District. This will allow the District to maintain current service levels.
The Fire District permanent tax rate of $.6164 does not generate sufficient revenues to cover the Fire District contract for emergency services from the City of Cornelius. In 2004 the Fire District’s voters approved a $575,000.00 Five-Year Local Option levy that has funded the District’s shortfall these past five years.
The new levy is $87,500 less than the prior levy. This is $17,500 per year reduction.
The estimated tax rate for this new five-year local option levy is $0.6989 per $1,000.00 assessed property value. This renewal levy combined with the permanent rate results in a total estimated rate of $1.3153 per $1,000.00 assessed property value. This is an estimated net reduction of $0.1255 per $1,000.00 assessed property value from the current Fiscal year 2008-2009 tax.
The total amount of the tax will be $97,500.00 per year for five years or $487,500.00 over five years. The tax would begin in Fiscal Year 2009-2010.
Submitted by, Dan Eischen, Treasurer Cornelius Rural Fire Protection District
no argUMents for or against this MeasUre were fileD.
W-75 gaston rUral fire Measure No. 34-162 ballot title
RENEWAL OF FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL AND OPERATIONS LOCAL OPTION TAX. QUESTION: Shall GRFPD renew current Local Option Tax at the rate of $0.67 per thousand for five years beginning in FY2010/2011? This measure may cause property taxes to increase by more than three percent. SUMMARY: The current permanent tax rate of $1.0921 per thou- sand does not allow the District to meet operational expenses or allocate reserve funds. As such, the voters approved a five-year Local Option Tax of $0.42 per thousand in 2004. This Local Option Tax expires June 30, 2010. This measure renews the current Local Option Tax with an increase of $0.25 per thousand to start July 1, 2010, after the current tax expires. The proposed total Local Option Tax of $0.67 ($0.42 plus $0.25) per thousand will cover rising opera- tional/capital costs. The funds raised by the measure will allow the District to contin- ue meeting operational costs and to allocate reserve funds. Fifty percent of the funds raised will be put into a reserve account to fund the purchase of apparatus, building repairs/improvements, and replacement of obsolete equipment. The proposed rate will raise approximately $162,512 in 2010- 2011, $169,922 in 2011-2012, $177,680 in 2012-2013, $185,804 in 2013-2014, and $194,313 in 2014/2015. eXplanatorY stateMent The District’s permanent tax rate is $1.0921 per thousand of assessed value. This rate was set by the Oregon Department of Revenue as a result of Measure 50 in 1998. This rate was insuf- ficient to meet rising costs and in November, 2004, voters approved a five year Local Option Tax (LOT) of $0.42 per thousand to allow the District to meet these operational expenses and to allocate reserve funds. The LOT has allowed the District to maintain a staff of one part time Chief, two full time firefighters, and one part time admin- istrative assistant. In addition, it has allowed the necessary funding for matches to Federal Grants while still reserving funds for building maintenance and capital expenditures.
Unfortunately, this LOT expires June 30, 2010. As such, the District is asking the voters to renew the LOT with a $0.25 per thousand increase. It is important to note this new LOT will not start until June 30, 2010, when the original LOT expires. The proposed LOT of $0.67 per thousand ($0.42 + $0.25) will allow the District to maintain cur- rent operations and manning given increased costs from 2004 and projected increases through 2015. Projections show the new LOT will also allow the District to replace outdated apparatus. Specifically the District will have funds necessary to replace an aging Brush Rig and Pumper.
If approved the LOT would generate revenue necessary to continue current manning, and allow for replacement of outdated apparatus, allowing the District to meet and improve its level of service to resi- dents and create stable funding for the future.
Submitted by: Phil Anderson Board Chairman
no argUMents for or against this MeasUre were fileD.
W-76 ContinUeD tUalatin valleY fire & resCUe Measure No. 34-154 ballot title Specifically: 1) Thirty-three additional firefighters and paramedics were hired. This allowed nine engine companies to increase from three RENEWS CURRENT TAX LEVY FOR EMERGENCY FIRE AND to four-person crews, making faster fire attack possible. Two MEDICAL SERVICES rescue units were also added, allowing teams of paramedics QUESTION: Shall TVF&R renew emergency services levy at $.25 to provide additional emergency medical response. per $1,000 assessed value for five years, beginning in FY 2010- 2) Six support staff were hired in training, technology, incident 2011? analysis, and accounting functions. 3) Heavy rescue vehicles were purchased. This measure may cause property taxes to increase more than 4) Safety equipment, including thermal imagers and firefighter air three percent. packs, were purchased. SUMMARY: Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue (“TVF&R”) provides 5) Mobile mapping terminals, which access detailed site maps, emergency fire and medical response services to approximately building layouts, and information on hazardous chemicals, 445,000 people. In 2007, TVF&R responded to 32,103 emer- were purchased and deployed to fire engines and command gency calls. vehicles. 6) A new training tower was constructed. In 2000, voters approved a four-year local option levy with a tax 7) Advanced heart defibrillators were purchased. rate of $.25 per $1,000 of assessed value. Levy funds were used to hire and retain 33 firefighters and paramedics and 6 support What would the proposed levy pay for? staff. The fire and paramedic positions increased staffing on 1) Retains firefighter and paramedic positions funded by the response units to help ensure sufficient personnel arrive within previous levies. These positions help ensure sufficient the initial minutes of an emergency. The remaining positions sup- personnel arrive within the initial minutes of an emergency. ported incident analysis, training, technology, and accounting 2) Retains support positions in training, technology, incident functions. analysis, and accounting functions funded by the previous In 2004, voters renewed the same tax rate and services for five levies. years. 3) Firefighter safety equipment. 4) Tools for firefighting and emergency medical response. If approved, this measure will continue the same levy of $.25 5) Emergency communications equipment. per $1000 for five more years. In addition to continuing to fund 6) Technology enhancements. personnel, the levy would pay for firefighting and medical tools, safety equipment, and technology improvements. Will property tax bills increase if this measure is approved? The tax rate would remain the same, but the assessed value of most If approved, the owner of a home with an assessed value of properties increases by 3% each year. As a result, the levy amount $220,000 in 2010 (estimated market value: $403,000) would pay increases by the same 3%. $55 in the levy’s first year. What is the total tax rate for TVF&R? The levy would raise an estimated $53,599,538 over five years. $1.53/$1,000 Permanent Rate The estimated revenues for each year of the levy are: .25/$1,000 Levy (being voted on) $ 9,738,999 in 2010-2011 .11/$1,000 Capital Improvement Bonds $10,206,471 in 2011-2012 $1.89/$1,000 Total $10,696,381 in 2012-2013 $11,209,808 in 2013-2014 $11,747,879 in 2014-2015 Levy cost to typical home: $55* Total cost: $416* The estimated tax cost for this measure is an ESTIMATE ONLY based on the best information available from the county assessor *Assumes 2010 assessed value: $220,000; market value: $403,000. at the time of estimate. What happens if this measure fails? Maintaining emergency response services would remain TVF&R’s priority. However, because the levy provides 14% of total District eXplanatorY stateMent operating revenues, reductions in staffing and operations would be required. Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue (TVF&R) provides fire suppression, emergency medical care, rescue, and fire prevention services. This information furnished by: TVF&R serves the cities of Beaverton, Durham, King City, Rivergrove, Jeffrey D. Johnson Sherwood, Tigard, Tualatin, West Linn, and Wilsonville, as well as Fire Chief unincorporated portions of Washington, Clackamas, and Multnomah Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue Counties. What is the history behind this proposal? Residents served by TVF&R first voted on this measure in 2000 and approved a four-year levy. In 2004, voters approved a renewal of the same levy and services for an additional five years. What does this measure call for? It proposes renewing the current levy for five more years at the same tax rate of $.25 per $1,000 of assessed value. It would continue to pay for fire suppression and emergency medical services. When would the new levy first be collected? It would appear for the first time on the November 2010 property tax statement. The tax rate of $.25 per $1,000 would be identical to what currently appears on individual tax bills. What was done with the levy funds voters approved in 2000 and 2004? no argUMents against this MeasUre The focus of both levies was additional personnel and updated were fileD. technology to improve response to fires and medical emergencies.
W-77 tUalatin valleY fire & resCUe Measure No. 34-154 argUMent for argUMent for TVF&R BOARD SUPPORTS MEASURE 34-154 SAME FAST RESPONSE, SAME TAX RATE
As the voter-elected Board of Directors for Tualatin Valley Fire & Last year, firefighters and paramedics with Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue (TVF&R), we are responsible for referring Measure 34-154 to Rescue (TVF&R) responded to more than 32,000 emergency 9-1-1 the ballot. calls. An average of 89 times per day, we were dispatched to a report- ed fire or emergency medical incident and responded with speed, We are unanimous in our support for Measure 34-154 for several expertise, and compassion. Our goal is always the same: treat those in reasons: need as we would our own families.
1. It is identical to TVF&R levies approved by voters in 2000 and The training and equipment available at TVF&R helps us achieve our 2004. 71% of voters approved renewal of the levy in 2004. goal of providing you and your family excellent service. The reputation of our organization attracts talented, caring firefighters and paramedics 2. As with the previous levies, it will help ensure a fast response from all over the country. and quick action by TVF&R firefighters and paramedics at fires, accidents, and medical emergencies. Your investment as a taxpayer helps make this possible.
3. As a five-year levy, it will be collected for the first time in Thank you. November 2010, after the current levy has expired. We understand that household budgets are stretched right now. Higher 4. The tax rate is $.25/$1,000 of assessed value, the same as the prices for food and fuel are just a few of the increases we are all con- current levy. The tax rate will not increase. tending with. Fortunately, Measure 34-154 is not a tax increase. It continues the same service you expect from your firefighters and para- The culture of TVF&R is similar to what you would expect from a well- medics at the same tax rate you have been paying for the last 8 years. run, mid-sized private company. Our priority commitment to safety is complimented by core organizational values of performance, cus- Measure 34-154 renews the same $.25/$1,000 rate that voters first tomer service, and professionalism. We emphasize training and focus approved in 2000 and then reauthorized with 71% support in 2004. For on continuous improvement. a typical home, that works out to $55 per year - but remember, you are currently paying a similar amount. If approved, this five year levy will be As the Board of Directors, we appreciate and thank you for your past collected for the first time in 2010, after the current levy has expired. support. The men and women of TVF&R work hard daily to earn you confidence. Rest assured they will continue to do so. For each of us, there is no better job and no better place to be a fire- fighter than serving you as part of Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue. We Please join us in voting “YES” on Measure 34-154. will be there for you and your family should you ever need us.
Robert Wyffels, President Thank you for your support. Carol Gearin, Vice President Brian Clopton, Secretary Clark Balfour, Board Member This information furnished by: Larry Goff, Board Member Rocky Hanes, President Tualatin Valley Firefighters Union
Tualatin Valley Board of Directors
This information furnished by: Robert Wyffels, President Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue Board of Directors
The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. any statement made in the argument.
W-78 tUalatin valleY fire & resCUe Measure No. 34-154 argUMent for VOLUNTEERS SUPPORT MEASURE 34-154
On behalf of the nearly 100 men and women serving as volunteer firefighters with Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue, we’re asking for your support for Measure 34-154.
As taxpayers and volunteers serving side-by-side with career fire- fighters, we get an “insiders view” of the benefits of our investment. We are supporting Measure 34-154 for three reasons:
1. It retains the firefighters and paramedics needed to ensure enough personnel arrive within the first minutes of an emergency to take immediate action.
2. It continues investment in equipment and training that allows TVF&R’s career and volunteer firefighters to serve you in a manner that is fast, effective, and safe.
3. This is the same tax rate that you (and we) have been paying since 2001. A “YES” vote simply extends the same 25 cents per $1,000 tax rate for five additional years. The tax rate stays the same - it does NOT increase.
We are members of the community, like you. Because of our commit- ment to public safety, we have chosen to serve as volunteers in addi- tion to our other roles as professionals, students, and parents.
At TVF&R, we support the career firefighters at incidents and cover stations when a major event pulls crews from a large area. Like mili- tary reservists, we give up nights and weekends to train so we are ready to respond when needed. In all cases, the goal is to provide you and your family with the fast response and high level of service you expect.
A “YES” vote on Measure 34-154 continues fast emergency response at the same tax rate we all have been paying for eight years. We think that’s a great investment.
Thank you for your support,
Ashley Trimble President
Brian Almquist Vice President
TVF&R Volunteer Firefighters Association
This information furnished by: Brian Almquist Vice President TVF&R Volunteer Firefighters Association
The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument.
W-79 banks sChool DistriCt no. 13 Measure No. 34-157
Replacing classroom buildings and renovating Junior High/High ballot title School facilities would improve items such as roofs, heating and ventilation, and safety and security systems. These upgrades also BONDS TO CONSTRUCT, RENOVATE BANKS JUNIOR HIGH, would reduce the district’s annual operating costs. HIGH SCHOOL FACILITIES QUESTION: Shall Banks School District construct, renovate, New Junior High School facilities, constructed on the same school expand Junior High, High School facilities by issuing general site, would obligation bonds not exceeding $25,500,000? If the bonds are approved, they will be payable from taxes on property or prop- • Accommodate approximately 400 students. erty ownership that are not subject to the limits of sections 11 • Include classrooms designed especially for science, computer and 11b, Article XI of the Oregon Constitution. technology, special education and vocational education. SUMMARY: If approved, this measure would replace Banks • Have a new library and other core area improvements. Junior High/High School facilities to reduce operating costs, add classroom space to accommodate student learning requirements and growing enrollment. Specifically, this measure would fund New High School facilities, constructed on the same school site, capital construction and improvements to: would: • Accommodate approximately 600 students. • Construct, furnish, equip school facilities to replace, renovate, expand existing Junior High School with new • Include classrooms designed especially for science, computer general education classrooms including classrooms for technology, special education and vocational education. science, computer technology, special education, • Have a new cafeteria, commons area, gym and related physical vocational education; new library; other core area education facilities, and other core area improvements. improvements.
• Construct, furnish, equip school facilities to replace, In addition the bond measure would provide funds to: renovate, expand existing High School with new general education classrooms including classrooms for science, • Renovate the remaining buildings/facilities at the Junior High/ computer technology, special education, vocational High School, including the existing cafeteria, gymnasium, locker education; cafeteria, commons area, gym and related rooms and music room so that they can continue to be used; physical education facilities; other core area improvements. • Make other district safety, security and code upgrades and site improvements including purchasing land adjacent to Junior • Make other district safety, security, code upgrades and site High/High School and Elementary School sites to reduce traffic improvements including purchasing land adjacent to congestion and provide safer access. Elementary, Junior High/High School sites to reduce traffic congestion and provide safer access. • Pay demolition costs and the fees associated with issuing the bonds. • Pay any demolition costs and fees associated with issuing bonds. The estimated tax rate increase for a $25.5 million bond would be Bonds would mature in twenty-seven (27) years or less from date approximately $1.99 per $1,000 of assessed property value per year, of issuance and may be issued in one or more series. or $199 per year more for each $100,000 of assessed property value. The bonds are expected to mature in approximately 27 years. The rate could vary depending on interest rates, changes in the District’s eXplanatorY stateMent total assessed value and from new homes and businesses, and other factors. Constructing new high school and junior high school classrooms and other facilities to improve student learning and upgrade safety, Source: Banks School District Business Office security and basic systems are top priority projects recommended by the community Facilities Planning Committee that spent two years Submitted by: studying enrollment growth, existing school conditions, and future Marvin Ott student learning requirements. Superintendent
• Banks High School was originally built in 1936. It has been expanded and renovated three times in 1950, 1967 and 1975. Further renovation to accommodate updated student learning and enrollment growth would not be cost effective, according to the community Facilities Planning Committee.
• A professional engineering study found the main junior high school building would not withstand a moderate earthquake and should be replaced.
• In the last 10 years, enrollment in Banks schools has increased by 25%, and enrollment is expected to increase by at least another 27% over the next 10 years, according to Portland State University’s Center for Population Research and Census Projections.
• Constructing additional classroom space at the Junior High School would allow the district to relieve crowding at the Elementary School by moving sixth graders to the Junior High School. no argUMents against this MeasUre were fileD.
W-80 banks sChool DistriCt no. 13 Measure No. 34-157 argUMent for Vote YES for Banks Schools 34-157
The Citizens for Banks Schools and Community Committee encour- ages you to vote YES for Banks Schools. Based on our observations and professional recommendations, we unanimously support this bond initiative.
YES for SAFETY and HEALTH! Replace older sections of the Junior High and High School that are structurally unsafe or not feasible to renovate. Remove failing, outdated facilities and systems to rid the air of mold, asbestos, and fumes. Eliminate fire risks by installing fire detection and suppression systems. Improve traffic flow at all schools to ease congestion and improve safety. Our new facilities will afford our children a safe, healthy place to learn.
YES for REDUCED OPERATION and MAINTENANCE COSTS! New and upgraded structures and systems will exceed current energy code and eliminate “band-aid” fixes. Basic maintenance of these out- dated buildings and related systems drains the district of resources. Improvements will drastically reduce our operation and maintenance budget so that our tax dollars can instead be used - as they should - to educate the kids in our community.
YES for MEETING STATE ACADEMIC REQUIREMENTS! Add new classrooms to the Junior High and High School to meet state-man- dated academic requirements that our current facilities cannot meet. Creating “High Performance Classrooms” will energize teachers and students, making it easier to educate our kids.
YES for FUTURE GROWTH! A population study by Portland State University’s Population Research Center forecasts that growth in our community could be 27% over the next ten years. With the additional classrooms, the school will be on track for meeting future population needs.
Our kids deserve safe, healthy schools that prepare them socially and academically to be productive members of our community. New and updated facilities will eliminate costly repairs to failing facilities.
INVEST IN OUR CHILDREN’S FUTURE - IT IS AN INVESTMENT WITH UNEQUALLED RETURNS. Vote YES for Measure 34-157!
This information furnished by: Christine Fore - Director Debra Wyckoff - Treasurer Citizens for Banks Schools and Community
The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument.
W-81 lake oswego sChool DistriCt Measure No. 3-305
porting fine arts, music, athletics, and after-school activities. The ballot title current local option levy, approved by voters in November 2004, maintains these upgrades, and combined with state school support FIVE-YEAR LOCAL OPTION OPERATING LEVY RENEWAL and LOSD Foundation revenues, has allowed the district to add addi- tional teaching positions, make further reductions in class sizes, and QUESTION: Shall the District renew its $1.39 levy per $1,000 of increase program offerings. assessed value to support operations for five years beginning Renewal of the local option levy (Measure 3-305) would provide 2010-11? This measure may cause property taxes to increase resources to sustain the level of programs and services provided by more than three percent. the current local option levy, assuming that state school support lev- SUMMARY: In November 2004, voters approved a renewal and els did not decrease. increase of the local option levy at a maximum rate of $1.39 per If state school support revenues declined, renewal of the local option $1,000 of assessed value, which expires in June 2010. This mea- levy would allow the district to minimize reductions. sure would renew the levy at the same maximum rate of $1.39. The Lake Oswego School District would use levy proceeds to continue supporting educational programs and services provided Submitted by: by the expiring levy. The levy would provide approximately 12% Deborah Lopardo of the District’s annual operating resources. School Board Chairperson A rate of $1.39 per $1,000 of assessed value is estimated to raise $7,200,000 in 2010-11, $7,400,000 in 2011-12, $7,600,000 in 2012-13, $7,800,000 in 2013-14, and $8,000,000 in 2014-15, for a total of $38,000,000 over five years. The amount of revenue the District could receive under this mea- sure, together with State funding, is capped by law. If changes in property values or other factors create the potential for more rev- enue than allowed, the District must reduce its rate to stay within cap limits. Under current limits, rate reductions are expected in years two through five of the levy period. eXplanatorY stateMent
This levy would renew at the same rate the five-year local option operating levy approved by voters in November 2004. This renewal levy would begin in July 2010, at the current rate that would con- tinue to cost property owners $1.39 or less per $1,000 of assessed value per year. The local option levy would provide the Lake Oswego School District with approximately 12% of its annual budget for instruction, programs, and operating expenses.
How Much The owner of a home assessed at $300,000 would continue to pay approximately $35 per month or $417 per year for the local option levy. Beginning in July 2010, property would be taxed at the same rate as the current local option levy of $1.39 per $1,000 of assessed value, and Lake Oswego School District taxpayers would see an overall reduction in their tax rates for schools. This is because in June 2010, the district will be retiring debt of approximately $0.25 per thousand of assessed value from its 1990 facilities bond. Legislation also limits the amount of revenue the Lake Oswego School District could receive from the local option. If changes in property values or other factors create the potential for more revenue than allowed, the District must reduce its local option tax rate in order to keep revenue within defined limits. Under current limits, rate reductions are expect- ed in years two through five of the local option period.
Why State law gives individual communities the ability to supplement state funding for their local schools. The current local option levy (expiring June 2010) provides approximately 12% of the district’s budget for instructional programs and operations. If the local option levy were not renewed, reductions in district programs and opera- tions of approximately $7 million, or approximately 12% of total expenditures, would be made beginning in 2010-11.
What When the first local option levy was approved in 2000, it allowed the district to add back some of the resources previously downsized no argUMents for or against and to upgrade both instruction and programs, including lower- ing class sizes, adding back the seventh period at the middle level, this MeasUre were fileD. supporting extensive college prep curricula and electives; and sup-
W-82 sCappoose sChool DistriCt Measure No. 5-188
last year.* More than 250 additional students are expected to enroll in ballot title our schools by 2020**. This bond would add classrooms to facilitate student learning. Technology infrastructure would also be increased SCAPPOOSE BOND TO CONSTRUCT, EXPAND, UPGRADE to enhance teaching and learning. SCHOOLS; REDUCE OPERATING COSTS QUESTION: Shall District reduce operating costs, facilitate Proposed bond projects: instruction by upgrading, expanding, constructing schools, issue • Reduce operating costs and increase energy efficiency; $33,300,000 general obligation bonds with citizen oversight? safety and security; and make other school site upgrades. • Construct, furnish and equip a new elementary school on If the bonds are approved, they will be payable from taxes on district-owned land located adjacent to Grant property or property ownership that are not subject to the limits Watts Elementary School. The new school would replace of sections 11 and 11b, Article XI of the Oregon Constitution. Petersen Elementary School. SUMMARY: Passage of this measure would upgrade school • Construct, furnish and equip additional elementary class facilities to reduce operating costs and add classroom space to rooms at Grant Watts and Warren. Renovate entrance at accommodate Scappoose School District’s growing enrollment Warren Elementary School for safety. by providing funds for capital construction and improvements • Add classrooms and auditorium at Scappoose High School. and to pay bond issuance costs. Specifically, this measure would: Bond amount • Reduce operating costs and increase energy efficiency The bond issue’s principal amount cannot exceed $33.3 million. Bond by renovating and upgrading District facilities including proceeds can only be used for the costs associated with the projects roofing; heating/ventilation, electrical, plumbing systems; listed on this ballot. safety and security; other site upgrades; • Construct, furnish, equip a new elementary school on Estimated costs to taxpayers district-owned land located adjacent to Grant Watts The estimated tax rate increase for a $33.3 million bond would be Elementary School; approximately $1.71 per one thousand dollars of assessed property value per year, or approximately $171 in additional taxes for each • Construct, furnish, equip additional classrooms at Grant $100,000 of assessed property value. Residents moving into the Watts and/or Warren Elementary School, including other community would assist in the payment of the bond measure. building and grounds upgrades, renovate entrance at Warren Elementary School for safety; additional classrooms and auditorium at Scappoose High School; The rate could vary depending on interest rates, growth in the • Establish citizen oversight committee to ensure bond funds District’s total assessed value from new homes and businesses, and are used as intended; other factors. For example, as the district’s assessed value increases more than anticipated, the tax rate would go down. A citizens’ over- • Pay bond issuance costs; and sight committee would be established to ensure bond funds are used as intended. Bonds would mature in 21 years or less from the date of issu- ance and may be issued in one or more series. *Information Source: Oregon Economic & Community Development, http://info.econ.state.or.us eXplanatorY stateMent Planning committee identifies school needs **Information Source: Scappoose School District Population and A nine-month, community-based planning process identified facil- Enrollment Forecasts 2006-07 to 2020-2021, prepared by the ity needs and outlined a plan for addressing the priority issues for Population Research Center, Portland State University, October, district buildings. The bond proposal is based on recommendations 2006. from this committee, made up of school district staff and community members. Submitted by: Paul D. Peterson Upgrades would improve energy efficiency and address priority Superintendent major building maintenance Energy efficiency was identified as an important facility issue. As energy prices continue to rise, the buildings are becoming more expensive to operate, taking funds away from instruction.
This bond addresses priority major school maintenance and infrastructure for the district’s aging schools. Improvements would include safety and security upgrades, roofs, heating/ventilation sys- tems, electrical and plumbing systems, and asbestos removal.
All district buildings exceed the Oregon Department of Energy’s recommended energy use targets. Petersen Elementary School uses more than twice the recommended target level for energy use. An estimated $100,000 per year would be saved in operational costs by replacing Petersen Elementary School and upgrading other schools for energy efficiency.
Facilitating student learning Additional classrooms would accommodate increasing enrollment. The Scappoose community and its schools are growing. The popula- no argUMents for or against tion of Scappoose has increased from 3,529 in 1990 to over 6,000 this MeasUre were fileD.
W-83 tigarD-tUalatin sChool DistriCt 23J Measure No. 34-163 ballot title expires in 2010-2011. If approved, the existing levy rate (which cannot exceed $1 per $1,000 of assessed value) would be continued for another five years. RENEW FIVE-YEAR LOCAL OPTION LEVY FOR SCHOOL OPERATIONS Is this measure within the limits established by Ballot Measure QUESTION: Shall district renew levy at a rate not to exceed $1 #5? per $1,000 assessed value for five years beginning 2010-2011? This measure may cause property taxes to increase more than three percent. Yes. SUMMARY: This measure would continue the Local Option levy originally approved in 2000 and renewed in 2004. It would keep The Local Option levy rate is calculated individually for each piece the existing levy rate for another five years beginning in 2010- of property so that the total rate paid for school operations stays 2011 when the current levy expires. within the Measure #5 limits. This levy would continue funding for approximately 84 teachers (11% of the district’s teaching staff) and the classroom programs provided by the expiring levy. Without the continuation of this Submitted by: revenue, the district’s budget for staffing and school operations Mark Chism would be reduced by approximately $7,100,000 in 2010-2011. Chair, Tigard-Tualatin School Board The rate, which would not exceed $1 per $1,000 assessed value, is estimated to raise $7,100,000 in 2010-2011; $7,310,000 in 2011-2012; $7,530,000 in 2012-2013, $7,760,000 in 2013-2014 and $7,990,000 in 2014-2015 for a total of $37,690,000 over five years. eXplanatorY stateMent
In 2000, voters approved a 5-year Local Option levy to fund teachers and education programs. Voters renewed this levy in 2004.
This measure would continue the current levy for another five years beginning in 2010-2011. It would keep the existing levy rate which would not exceed $1 per $1,000 of assessed value.
Approval of this measure would continue funding for 84 teachers and the classroom programs provided by the expiring levy.
The following questions and answers have been provided to sum- marize this measure:
What does this measure do?
This measure would: • Renew the current Local Option at the existing levy rate; • Continue funding for approximately 84 teachers who work in classrooms in every district school; • Help to maintain the current educational program; • Help to prevent increases to class size.
What would happen if this levy is not renewed?
Loss of this revenue would reduce the district’s budget for staff- ing and school operations by $7,100,000 in 2010-2011.
It would mean increases to class size and reduced funding for educational programs.
The 84 teachers funded by the existing Local Option levy repre- sent 11% of the district’s teaching staff.
When would this measure take effect? no argUMents against this MeasUre The Local Option renewal would take effect when the current levy were fileD.
W-84 ContinUeD tigarD-tUalatin sChool DistriCt 23J Measure No. 34-163 argUMent for argUMent for Please VOTE YES for our schools and our children. The Tigard Tualatin Business Community Supports Measure 34-163 Measure 34-163 is good for kids, it’s good for property values, and it won’t increase your property tax rate. Community Support for Schools
• The current Local Option Levy funds 11% of the district’s “It’s time to renew the local option and show our continuing support teaching staff. for Tigard-Tualatin Schools. Our community voted in support of adding By voting yes, we can prevent increases to class size. The 84 teachers and courses by voting for the local option. Lets keep those teachers provided by the Local Option provide our kids with 84 teaching positions and classes by voting YES on Measure 34-163.” greater opportunities in reading, math, art, music and PE. Steve Clark, Publisher, The Times
• This is not a new or additional tax. “Parents, business owners, seniors and all the residents of Tualatin It is simply a continuation of the Local Option levy voters and Tigard always stand up for our schools and kids. Voting YES on approved in 2000 and again in 2004. Measure 34-163 is a chance to back them again!” Susan Snell, Partner, Martin, Elliott & Snell, P.C. • Strong Schools = Strong Property Values Property values are greater in areas with strong public schools. Top-Notch Education Keeping all of the public schools in Tigard and Tualatin strong helps us all. “The local option gives us the chance to continue providing a top- notch education for our children. Join me in voting YES on Measure Join us in supporting this measure: 34-163.” Kevin Curry, Partner, Command LLC Kevin & Jamie Anderson, Alberta Rider Parents Barbara and Doug Chiapuzio, Templeton & Tigard “Good schools are good for business, which is why I am supporting Parents Measure 34-163!” Steve & Randy Clark, Bull Mountain Residents Ronnda L. Zezula Griffith, Oregon Holistic Health Group, Tigard Kevin & Katie Curry, Durham Elementary Parents Phil & Jennifer Donovan, future parents at Metzger Carolyn Griffith, King City Keep Our Schools The Best! James L. Griffith, Tigard Leigh Anne Hadley & Karl Blazer, Byrom Parents “I’m proud to be a Tigard resident and proud to have my business in Dewey & Margaret Hamilton, Summerfield Residents the community. A YES vote on Measure 34-163 will make sure our Bill Kaltenthaler and Lisa Fratianni, Twality Parents schools remain the best in Oregon.” Dick and Linda Kirschbaum, Durham Parents Jeremiah Giles, Owner Giles Inc. dba Pasta Veloce Jerry and Jan Larsen, Tualatin Citizens Tim & Janene Larson, Rider & Twality Parents Jerry & Deanna Nihill, Woodward & Fowler Parents Protect Teaching Positions, Keep Class Size Down Kevin and Kimberly O’Toole, Bridgeport Parents Jennifer Price, Byrom Parent Kim & Brent Richardson, Tualatin Parents “Renewing the local option is imperative for Tigard and Tualatin resi- Art Rutkin, Tigard-Tualatin School Board dents. It will protect over 80 teaching positions and keep class sizes Michael & Alice Shaw, Woodward, Fowler & Tigard from growing and courses from being cut. That’s why I am voting YES High Parents on Measure 34-163.” Doug & Chris Shell, Tualatin Elementary & Doron Bandel, Team Bandel, Oregon State Licensed Real Estate Hazelbrook Parents Brokers with The Meadows Group AI Spencer, Tualatin Resident Kathy Stallkamp, Deer Creek and Tualatin High Parent “Our kids of this community deserve the best education we can give Chip & Dana Terhune, Bridgeport & Hazelbrook them. We can maintain funds for 84 teachers and keep class size low Parents by VOTING YES to continue the Local Option Levy, Measure 34-163.” Bryan & Maureen Wolf, Woodward & Fowler Parents Wayne & Jan Kittelson, Tigard Community Members, Kittelson & Rachel Van Horn, Deer Creek and Twality Parent Associates and Quality Counts Jill Zurchmeide, Tigard-Tualatin School Board This information furnished by: This information furnished by: Jan Kittelson Dana Terhune
The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. any statement made in the argument.
W-85 tigarD-tUalatin sChool DistriCt 23J Measure No. 34-163 argUMent for VOTE YES To Renew The Local Option Levy
Tigard and Tualatin voters have a strong tradition of supporting our children and our schools.
Thank You!
Renewing the Local Option Levy is the opportunity to continue the excellence for which our schools are known.
The Local Option Levy provides:
• 84 teaching positions spread across the district; • Smaller class sizes; • Continuation of current programs and opportunities for students.
Please protect our schools by VOTING YES on Measure 34-163!
District voters approved the Local Option Levy in 2000 and renewed it by VOTING YES in 2004.
In addition to being teachers in Tigard and Tualatin, we are also par- ents, residents and voters. We are proud of the district and the edu- cation it provides our children and your children.
Join us in VOTING YES to renew the Local Option Levy!
Betty Aikens, Middle School Fine Arts and Home Economics Teacher Shawn Alderman, High School PE Teacher Kathy Arnold, 2nd Grade Teacher Mary Bell, 2nd Grade Teacher Diane Bonica, Kindergarten Teacher Nancy Brown, Elementary Counselor Rosalie Brown-Lundh, Elementary Music Teacher Mark Dolbeer, High School Math Teacher Ron Dyer, High School Math Teacher Karen Hughart, Kindergarten Teacher Allison Hutchins, 2nd Grade Teacher Sharon Koch, 4th Grade Teacher Anne Lewis, Elementary Music Teacher Janet Lockwood, Elementary Librarian Kati Fantz McKee, High School Economics Teacher Sue Manning, Middle School Science Teacher Alana Ollerenshaw, 1st Grade Teacher Cathy Peterson, 5th Grade Teacher Sue Scott, Elementary School Librarian Leanna Taylor, Middle School 6th Grade Teacher Janet Winterrowd, 3rd Grade Teacher
This information furnished by: Janet Winterrowd Election Information Advisory Committee
The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by Washington County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument.
W-86 ContinUeD west linn-wilsonville sChool DistriCt 3J Measure No. 3-307 ballot title
FIVE-YEAR LOCAL OPTION OPERATING LEVY RENEWAL QUESTION: Shall the District renew its $1.50 levy per $1,000 of assessed value for general operations for five years beginning 2010-2011? This measure may cause property taxes to increase more than three percent. SUMMARY: In November 2004, voters approved a local option levy of $1.50 per $1,000 of assessed value to support West Linn- Wilsonville School District No. 3J (the “District”) operations. This measure would renew that levy at the same rate. This measure would provide funds to the District to maintain cur- rent programs and staffing levels at schools. Without continua- tion of this revenue, the District would need to reduce its budget by approximately $7,282,000 in 2010-2011. The proposed rate of $1.50 per $1,000 of assessed value is estimated to raise $7,282,000 in 2010-2011, $7,500,000 in 2011- 2012, $7,725,000 in 2012-2013, $7,957,000 in 2013-2014, and $8,196,000 in 2014-2015 for an estimated total of $38,660,000 over the five years. $1.50 per $1,000 of assessed value is the maximum rate any property would be assessed. As is the case with the current levy, rates for many properties would be less. The average rate is expected to be $1.35 per $1,000 of assessed value. In no case would the total education tax exceed $5.00 per $1,000 of real market value. eXplanatorY stateMent
This levy is a renewal of the five year Local Option levy approved by voters in November 2004. It would be a continuation of the levy rate established at that time. This levy would be used to fill the shortfall between the expected expenditure level needed to maintain current teaching staff and pro- grams and State school funding. The district would use the tax rev- enues from this measure to maintain current services (e.g., to retain the same number of teachers, instructional assistants and other staff) and where possible to reduce class size and/or for other program enhancements such as the arts. If this measure is not approved, the district would face significant reductions in teaching staff and ser- vices of approximately $7,282,000 in 2010-11. The district has used careful planning and use of cash reserves to supplement State funding in order to maintain programs and services expected by the community. The current Local Option has enabled the district to maintain class sizes, programs, and services to sup- port student performance that is among the highest in the State and nation (e.g., high State Assessment and SAT scores). Programs such as foreign language and the arts have been maintained and even expanded. The district maintains a very low level of cash reserves and the annual State revenue for program operations is not adequate to fund current programs and services. This Local Option would fill the gap between State funding and program maintenance expenditure needs. The calculation of the local option tax rate is difficult to understand since each property is uniquely calculated. However, each property’s total operating education tax would not exceed the Measure 5 limit of $5 per $1,000 of Real Market Value (RMV). The average property tax for this levy would be similar to current tax rates for the local option. This Local Option is estimated to raise $7,282,000 in 2010-11, $7,500,000 in 2011-12, $7,725,000 in 2012-13, $7,957,000 in 2013- 14, and $8,196,000 in 2014-15 for an estimated total of $38,660,000 over the five years.
Submitted by: Roger L. Woehl Superintendent no argUMents for or against this MeasUre were fileD.
W-87 west linn-wilsonville sChool DistriCt 3J Measure No. 3-308
• Kitchen renovations at Stafford Primary, Cedaroak Park ballot title Primary, Bolton Primary, Boeckman Creek Primary and Wood Middle School; plus lower level remodel at Bolton Primary GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND FOR SCHOOL FACILITY School that would include kitchen and cafeteria. ADDITIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS • New district storage building with walk-in freezer at the District QUESTION: Shall West Linn-Wilsonville School District issue Operations Center. general obligation bonds totaling $98,000,000 to finance additions and improvements to its facilities? If the bonds are approved, they will be payable from taxes on property or prop- • Technology upgrades in all schools and district facilities over a erty ownership that are not subject to the limits of section 11b, 4 year period. Article XI of the Oregon Constitution. • Repairs and maintenance at all school district facilities to Passage of measure would provide funds to finance SUMMARY: address: safety, equity, energy conservation, health and capital construction and improvements. Specifically, this mea- wellness, roofs, playgrounds, parking lots and handicap sure would: accessibility. • Update existing school district buildings by upgrading items such as roofs, heating and ventilation, safety and • Planning and architectural design for the replacement of security, and ADA accessibility. Sunset Primary school and site master planning for a future • Construct, equip and furnish a new 500-student primary middle school in Wilsonville. Community involvement is a key school - Wilsonville component of this activity. • Construct, equip and furnish a new 300-student primary school - West Linn • New library at Stafford Primary • Athletic field improvements for Women’s Softball for both high • New library and instructional classroom at Cedaroak Park schools, Baseball at WLHS, and Tennis at WHS. All weather Primary turf and proposed lighting would be added to the Rosemont • Site athletic improvements at West Linn High, Wilsonville Ridge sports field. These additions are expected to create High and Rosemont Ridge Middle School significant savings in annual watering and maintenance costs, • New district storage/freezer at Operations Center and increase participation opportunities for the community. • Library renovations at Boeckman Creek Primary, Bolton Primary, and Wood Middle School • Kitchen remodels at Boeckman Creek Primary, Bolton Submitted by: Primary, Cedaroak Park Primary, Stafford Primary and Wood Roger L. Woehl Middle School Superintendent • Remodel lower level and cafeteria at Bolton Primary • New school planning and design for Sunset Primary and future middle school at the Advance Road site in Wilsonville • District-wide technology Bonds would mature in 26 years or less from issuance date and may be issued in one or more series. eXplanatorY stateMent
West Linn - Wilsonville Schools continue to experience steady annual growth. The school district has nearly doubled in size over the past 20 years. The District enrollment is now at 8,300 students. A project- ed annual increase of 1.5% will grow the enrollment to approximately 9,200 students in 2015. The District enrollment current exceeds facil- ity capacity. There are 14 portable classrooms housing 400 students across the District. The School Board, in conjunction with a community Bond Summit and input from the citizen Long Range Planning Committee, has developed a $98,000,000 Capital Construction Bond that would improve safety and efficiency as well as educational facilities for cur- rent and future students.
This Capital Bond would provide for: • Two new primary schooIs–a 500 student school in Wilsonville and a 300 student school in West Linn. The expenditure planning for these schools includes all architectural design, permits, site development, furniture, technology, library and playground. Each school will be fully equipped and ready to receive students upon completion. The new primary in Wilsonville and the new primary in West Linn would open in 2011.
• Library/media additions at Cedaroak Park Primary and Stafford Primary; and, library renovations at Boeckman Creek Primary, Bolton Primary, and Wood Middle School.
• New instructional classroom at Cedaroak Park Primary. no argUMents for or against this MeasUre were fileD.
W-88 VIEW WASHINGTON COUNTY NOVEMBER 4, 2008 ELECTION RESULTS
Starting at 8:00 P.M.
Internet Sites:
Local:
http://www.co.washington.or.us/
State: http://www.sos.state.or.us/elections/
------
RESULTADOS DE LAS ELECCIONES DEL CONDADO DE WASHINGTON NOVIEMBRE 4, 2008
Iniciando a las 8:00 P.M.
Lugares en la Internet:
Local:
http://www.co.washington.or.us/
Estado: http://www.sos.state.or.us/elections/
W-89 W-90 Curbside Drop-off will be available
November 3, 2008 8:00 am – 5:30 pm
November 4, 2008 Election day 7:00 am – 8:00 pm
At the following Locations:
Kmart parking lot Washington County 3955 SW Murray Blvd, Election Office Beaverton, OR 3700 SW Murray Blvd (On the NW corner of Murray Blvd and Beaverton, OR Tualatin Valley Hwy)
W-91 ballot dropsites
Ballots must be received by 8pm on Election Day 24-hour dropsites Public Services Building Service Center East Building Rear Entrance Front Lobby 155 N 1st Ave 3700 SW Murray Blvd (1st and Main) (Murray and Millikan) Hillsboro Beaverton
Banks Library Cornelius Library 111 Market St 1355 N Barlow St
Hillsboro Library Forest Grove Main Branch 2102 Pacific Ave 2850 NE Brookwood Pkwy (Pacific Ave and Ash St)
King City - City Hall North Plains City Hall 15300 SW 116th Ave 31360 NW Commercial
Sherwood City Hall Tigard City Hall 22560 SW Pine St 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tualatin City Offices Council Building 18880 SW Martinazzi Ave
indoor dropboxes (call to confirm hours) Beaverton Library Cedar Mill Library 12375 SW 5th St 12505 NW Cornell Rd 503 644 2197 503 644 0043 Garden Home Library Hillsboro Library 7475 SW Oleson Rd Shute Park Branch 503 245 9932 775 SE 10th Ave 503 615 6500 West Slope Library 3678 SW 78th Ave 503 292 6416
Washington County Elections 3700 SW Murray Blvd Suite 101 Beaverton OR 97005 503 846 5800 www.co.washington.or.us