DOCSLIB.ORG

Lindback Award for Distinguished Teaching (Almanac April 4, 1989)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lindback Award for Distinguished Teaching (Almanac April 4, 1989) INSIDE " SEC Agenda April 5, p. 2 " On Disrupting the Judiciary, p. 2 " Quotes about Lindback Winners, p. 2 " Med School Teaching Awards, p. 3 " Freshman Houses " Deaths, p. 2 " Council: Interim Report on Developing a Diversity Education Program, pp. 4-6 " Speaking Out: Withdraw or Change? pp.6-7 " CrimeStats, Update, p. 8 Tuesday, April 4, 1989Published by the University of Pennsylvania Volume 35, Number 29 Lindbacks '89 Dr. Renee Fox Dr. Karin Calvert Dr. Alexander Nehamas I)r. Ldward .S7p',n,nh To celebrate the awards all-University distinguished reaching Stepping Aside: Dr. Stemmier just announced by Provost Michael Aiken, the date to reserve The University will reestablish a com- is April 28. The time and place of the reception are to be an- bined structure for the nounced. And the winners are... four the leadership Hospital, Lindbacks from School of Medicine and Clinical Practices, health schools, below; four from other schools, above; and, of the two winners of and its present search for a Dean Medicine below right, the Provost's Award. (See will become a search for someone to fill both 2 for notes and on all ten.) page quotes roles, President Sheldon Hackney said Monday. Dr. Edward J. Stemmier, executive vice Dr. Bruce Kuklik president of the Medical Center, has stepped aside to enable the University to find a can- didate for the new position, Dr. Hackney added. The change is effective immediately, and Dr. Stemmler will rejoin the faculty as the Robert G. Dunlop Professor of Medicine. "It is important in an academic medical center that all components serve the aca- demic and research mission of the institu- tion," Dr. Hackney said. "By combining the duties of the two positions, we assure that it We Dr. L)pborah Gillette Dr. Yale Goldman has the best organizational arrangement. intend to search for an individual who can fill both roles in the strong tradition that, in fact, Dr. Stemmler established." Dr. StemmIcr had been acting dean for a year and dean for 11 years when the Medical Center was formed in 1986 to integrate Dr. Clelia Mallory medical education, research and patient care. In the formative period he headed both School and Center, but last year he asked to have the positions separated so that he could devote full time to the Center. Dr. Arthur Asbury of neurology has since been acting dean. "Dr. Stemmler has given Penn years of outstanding service, and he is a recognized leader in medical education. I hope he will continue to speak out on the challenges facing medical education and health care in Dr. Marilyn Hess Dr. Michael Laposata Linda V. Walsh general," President Hackney said. SENATE From the Chair On Disruption of the Judiciary We are profoundly disturbed by recent events surrounding the ongoingjudicial proceeding involving Mr. Vincent Phaahla. The is in Senate following agenda published accordance with the Rules. In our view, fairness requires that all alleged violations of the Code of Academic be thesame Agenda of Senate Executive Committee Meeting Integrity adjudicated using We note that the mechanisms for en- Wednesday, April 5,1989,3-5:30 p.m. procedures. existing forcement of the Code involve the participation of faculty 1. Approval of the minutes of March 1, 15 and 22,1989 members and students, who unselfishly give their time and attention to this the of which is essential to 2. Chair's Report activity, integrity a community such as ours. 3. Additional discussion of Spring Faculty Senate meeting agenda (sched- We remind the University community that disruption of a uled for April 26) judicial proceeding, including in particular any attempts to 4. Report on Admissions the Senate Committee Undergraduate Policy by intimidate the participants, constitutes flagrant disregard of on Students and Educational Policy the rules of the University and of the customs of a scholarly 5. Discussion of interim reports of Provost's working groups on interna- community. We urge all members of the University to stand tional programs (statement from SEC members Professors Spooner and together to support the integrity of the judicial process and to Teune) and with-information environment continue to make certain ablethat these proceedingsare reach a fair and 6. Revision in child care policy proposed by the Senate Committee on out interference, in order that they may just the Faculty conclusion. 7. University Council Committee on Research draft policy on misconduct Sheldon Hackney Michael Aiken in research President Provost 8. Discussion of diversity awareness seminars 9. Other new business Ed Note: The message above refers to a sit-in that took place Friday, 10. Adjournment by 5:30 p.m. March 24, and is covered in the Daily Pennsylvanian Monday, March was to 3, and at Questions can be directed to Carolyn Burdon, Faculty Senate Staff Assis- 27. The hearing rescheduled Monday, April presstime tant, Ext. 8-6943. it was reported that the scheduled hearing went forward while a dem- onstration occurred outside. The Lindback Awards for 1989: Thumbnail Sketches of Distinguished Teachers Each year's eight winners of the Christian gift of stiulating class discussion in even the Dr. Michael Laposata, assistant professor of and Mary Lindback Awards for Distinguished largest classes-which have reached 140 stu- pathology and laboratory medicine, is not only Teaching-and the two who win Penn's newer dents. An award-winning teacherat Pitt before Socratic in small groups but his large lectures Provost's Awards-go through a review proc- joining Penn, he is called "provocative in the in Pathology 200 (taken by all medical stu- ess that yields reams of recommendations from best, purely intellectual sense, and knows how dents) are seen as models of educational excel- students, colleagues and alumni. A few of the to draw the best of of virtually any student." lence that "convey concepts rather than minu- things that were said of this years winners: tiae." In the Med School's rigorous teaching ...And in the Health Schools: evaluation system, students grade his lectures Dr. Karin F.L. Calvert, assistant professor of And, add, he Dr. Deborah Gillette, assistant professor of in the 3.8 to4.0 range. colleagues American civilization, was praised for chal- pathology and pathohiology/Vet, is a "com- displays concern for the students as well as the lenging students, treating them as colleagues passionate, dedicated, organized and thought- school's educational mission by involvement and delivering such lively lectures that enroll- provoking lecturer who spares no effort to on committees that deal with those issues . ment in one course she initiated, Childhood in impart knowledge." The New Bolton-hascd America, went from 7 students to 71 in three ...Plus the Provost's Awards V.M.D./Ph.D., who won the highest ratings of years. Said one student: "It is the 'thrill of the 11 who teach in her core courses, gives stu- The Provost's Awards were created to honor chase' she is able to share with her students dents a foundation for lifetime learning by "a the best teaching in ranks that are not tenured which make her classes unique." winners: painstakingly honest method of observing all or tenure-accruing. This year's Dr. Renee C. Fox, the Professor of details, those that do not fit the Annenhcrg especially Dr. Clelia Mallory is the senior lecturer in chem- Social Sciences, is a one whose to "capacity expected picture." istry who is responsible for the undergraduate communicate complex ideas and subtle analy- Dr. Yale Goldman, associate professor of physi- laboratory program in organic chemistry- ses is integrally linked to her unusual capacity courses ology/Med, has"a truly special ability to evoke teaching the crucial Chem 245/246 lab to validate and empower her students," one magicin the classroom' whether in the skeletal that are required for prc-health professions. wrote. esteemed as a scholar's Internationally muscle unit he leads or in lectures to other Students welcome her lectures as well organ- scholar in the sociology of medicine, to stu- sections. The recognized authority on the ized and delivered-and her guidance in the dents she represents "accessibility... as able molecular mechanism by which muscle con- lab, where she is known caring,diligent, fairness...moral integrity," and the ability to verts chemical to mechanical energy (and new to instill a sense of control by the student and "extract the potential in our minds." work, to head of the Pennsylvania Muscle Institute) has, willing to spend time to discuss the Dr. Bruce Kuklik, professor of history, is de- colleagues say, the most complex material in work with students on experiments and "often scribed as "an extremely conscientious teacher the course; students praise his "uncanny ability to calm down nervous and jittery pre-meds." who wants all of his students not to learn to it, and one only explain..organize...synthesizc" Linda V. Walsh, a lecturer in the School of the different theories and angles of American says "I have never had a teacher with so much Nursing's graduate program in nurse-midwifery, history, but also to enjoy the process of learn- in the of ideas." absorption development is both a clinical role model and a developing ing." Though his introductory and advanced Dr. Marilyn Hess, professor of pharmacology, academician whom students praise as a critical courses are the largest and most popular in his has shown a 30-yeardedication to teaching that thinker who is "poised, confident and caring" area, and he has published live important books, is "legendary in the Medical School" where she in teaching new parents, fellow doctoral stu- students find him available to counsel "always is for the of lectures,con- dents-and She is noted and advise." responsible complex faculty colleagues.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nietzsche and Aestheticism
    University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 1992 Nietzsche and Aestheticism Brian Leiter Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/journal_articles Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Brian Leiter, "Nietzsche and Aestheticism," 30 Journal of the History of Philosophy 275 (1992). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Notes and Discussions Nietzsche and Aestheticism 1o Alexander Nehamas's Nietzsche: L~fe as Literature' has enjoyed an enthusiastic reception since its publication in 1985 . Reviewed in a wide array of scholarly journals and even in the popular press, the book has won praise nearly everywhere and has already earned for Nehamas--at least in the intellectual community at large--the reputation as the preeminent American Nietzsche scholar. At least two features of the book may help explain this phenomenon. First, Nehamas's Nietzsche is an imaginative synthesis of several important currents in recent Nietzsche commentary, reflecting the influence of writers like Jacques Der- rida, Sarah Kofman, Paul De Man, and Richard Rorty. These authors figure, often by name, throughout Nehamas's book; and it is perhaps Nehamas's most important achievement to have offered a reading of Nietzsche that incorporates the insights of these writers while surpassing them all in the philosophical ingenuity with which this style of interpreting Nietzsche is developed. The high profile that many of these thinkers now enjoy on the intellectual landscape accounts in part for the reception accorded the "Nietzsche" they so deeply influenced.
    [Show full text]
  • False Variety: Plato's Fear of the Mass Media
    ISSN: 2519-1268 Issue 4 (Autumn 2017), pp. 9-29 DOI: 10.6667/interface.4.2017.33 False Variety: Plato’s Fear of the Mass Media hua-κuei ho Chinese Culture University Abstract Plato’s criticisms of poetry in the Republic X have been compared by Alexander Nehamas to modern élitist criticisms of television in the 1970s and 80s. In his “Plato and the Mass Media” (1988), Nehamas explained that the poetry attacked by Plato —either Homer’s epics or the celebrated tragedies performed in theatres— was in the form of “popular entertainment” in the cultural context of Athens in the fifth century B.C. The aim of my paper is not to endorse the élitist attitude toward popular entertainment. What I wish to argue is that the variety shown by media does not entail our free choices among the various items. One significant feature of the mass media revealed by Nehamas is that the mimesis (representation/imitation) in it is “transparent.” The “transparent mimesis” is the representation which mirrors things simply according to how they appear to the audience. Due to the transparency, the work of popular entertainment “requires little or no interpretation.” In this paper, I will explore the concept of the “transparent mimesis” in Plato and compare it with some views in contemporary aesthetics. On freedom, I will compare it with Adorno. As for the variety shown in the transparent mimesis, I will challenge the idea that Greek art is “realistic”, by consulting the studies of aesthetics by Gombrich, Wollheim, and Halliwell. Mimesis resembles not simply real things, but things which appear to certain fixed points of views.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander Nehamas, the Art of Living
    Alexander Nehamas, The art of living: Socratic reflections from Plato to Foucault (Sather Classical Lectures volume 61) University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1998. pp. xi + 283. ISBN 0-520-21173-1 John Cottingham, Philosophy and the Good Life: reason and the passions in Greek, Cartesian and psychoanalytic ethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998. pp xiii + 230. ISBN 0-521-47310-1 hardback; 0-521-47890-1 paperback. Jonathan Lear, Open minded: working out the logic of the soul. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 1998. ISBN 0-674-45533-9 The history of Philosophy is spangled with occasional figures who are so fascinating and so irritating that the subject can never let them go: Socrates, Descartes, Nietzsche, Freud, Wittgenstein, Foucault to name but a few. The continuous love-hate relationship that philosophers feel or have felt for these figures is something that perhaps we ought to be able to explain. Indeed, could it not be that what makes us so annoyed or so fascinated is our inability to put our finger on precisely what it is that attracts or repels us about the character in question? Neither Descartes, nor Wittgenstein nor Freud figures in Alexander Nehamas' choice of Socratic disciples—his later chapters select Montaigne, Nietzsche and Foucault for attention—whereas Plato, Aristotle and Freud gain more attention in the explorations of John Cottingham, and Wittgenstein as well as Freud figure prominently in the book by Jonathan Lear: Cottingham and Lear share neither the Socratic focus of Nehamas nor his desire to unpack what accounts for our fascination; but there remains a certain coherence to this otherwise unrelated set of books all of which happened to be published in 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • Walter Kaufmann
    © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher. Introduction walter kaufmann was born in Freiburg in Breisgau, Germany, on July 1, 1921, and died in Princeton, New Jersey, on September 4, 1980, far too young, at fifty‑nine, for someone of his vitality.1 His colleague, the Princeton histo‑ rian Carl Schorske, remained lucid until his death in 2015, after having cel‑ ebrated his one‑hundredth birthday.2 Arthur Szathmary, who together with Walter Kaufmann joined Princeton’s Department of Philosophy in 1947, died in 2013 at ninety‑seven; and Joseph Frank, emeritus professor of compara‑ tive literature at Princeton, with whom Walter debated an understanding of Dostoevsky’s Notes from Underground, passed away in 2013 at ninety‑four, some months after publishing his last book.3 It is hard to imagine Kaufmann’s sudden death at that age arising from an ordinary illness, and in fact the cir‑ cumstances fit a conception of tragedy—if not his own. According to Walter’s brother, Felix Kaufmann, Walter, while on one of his Faustian journeys of exploration to West Africa, swallowed a parasite that attacked his heart. In the months following, Walter died of a burst aorta in his Princeton home. His death does not fit his own conception of tragedy, for his bookThe Faith of a Heretic contains the extraordinary sentences: When I die, I do not want them to say: Think of all he still might have done.
    [Show full text]
  • Heidegger on Ontotheology: Technology and the Politics of Education Iain D
    Cambridge University Press 052161659X - Heidegger on Ontotheology: Technology and the Politics of Education Iain D. Thomson Frontmatter More information Heidegger on Ontotheology Technology and the Politics of Education Heidegger is now widely recognized as one of the most influential philosophers of the twentieth century, yet much of his later phi- losophy remains shrouded in confusion and controversy. Restoring Heidegger’s understanding of metaphysics as “ontotheology” to its rightful place at the center of his later thought, this book explains the depth and significance of his controversial critique of technology, his appalling misadventure with Nazism, his prescient critique of the university, and his important philosophical suggestions for the future of higher education. It will be required reading for those seeking to understand the relationship between Heidegger’s philosophy and National Socialism as well as the continuing relevance of his work. Iain D. Thomson is assistant professor of philosophy at the University of New Mexico, where he received the Gunter Starkey Award for Teaching Excellence. His articles on Heidegger have been pub- lished in Inquiry, Journal of the History of Philosophy, the International Journal of Philosophical Studies, and the Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology. © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 052161659X - Heidegger on Ontotheology: Technology and the Politics of Education Iain D. Thomson Frontmatter More information Heidegger on Ontotheology Technology and the Politics of Education IAIN D. THOMSON University of New Mexico © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 052161659X - Heidegger on Ontotheology: Technology and the Politics of Education Iain D. Thomson Frontmatter More information cambridge university press Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, S˜aoPaulo Cambridge University Press 40 West 20th Street, New York, ny 10011-4211, usa www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521851152 C Iain D.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander Nehamas.Pdf
    Princeton University HONORS FACULTY MEMBERS RECEIVING EMERITUS STATUS May 2021 [ 1 ] The biographical sketches were written by staff and colleagues in the departments of those honored. Published by the Office of the Dean of the Faculty Coordinated by the Office of Communications Copyright © 2021 by The Trustees of Princeton University Printed on recycled paper 121074 In the Nation’s Service and the Service of Humanity 121074 [ 2 ] Contents Faculty Members Honored in 2021 for Receiving Emeritus Status Chih-p’ing Chou ..................................3 Lynn William Enquist .............................7 Edward William Felten ...........................10 Andrew L. Ford .................................12 Olga Peters Hasty ................................ 15 Michael Jennings ................................18 Gerta Keller ....................................21 Sara McLanahan ................................24 Alexander Nehamas ..............................29 Philip Nord.....................................32 James Richardson................................36 Thomas Shenk ..................................38 Yakov Sinai.....................................41 Marta Tienda ...................................43 Robert J. Wuthnow ..............................46 [ 1 ] AleXanDer Nehamas lexander Nehamas was born and raised in Athens, Greece. At A the age of eight, he was sent to Athens College, Greece’s most distinguished boarding school, which was just five miles from his home. His first introduction to philosophy came at boarding school,
    [Show full text]
  • Babette E. Babich NIETZSCHE's IMPERATIVE AS a FRIEND's
    Babette E. Babich NIETZSCHE’S IMPERATIVE AS A FRIEND’S ENCOMIUM: ON BECOMING THE ONE YOU ARE, ETHICS, AND BLESSING Es zeiget sich mit einem goldnen Tage Und die Vollkommenheit ist ohne Klage. Hölderlin: Der Herbst In Memoriam Ivan Illich (1926-2002) Among Friends: Between the Imperative and the Encomium Nietzsche’s imperative call, Werde, der Du bist - Become the one you are - is, to say the least, an odd sort of imperative: dissonant and yet intrinsically inspiring. Thus Alexander Nehamas in an essay on this very theme names it the “most haunting of Nietzsche’s haunting aphorisms.”1 Expressed as it is in The Gay Science,“Du sollst der werden, der du bist” (GS 270, KSA 3, p. 519) - Thou shalt - you ought to - you should - become the one you are -, such a command opposes the strictures of Kant’s practical imperatives, offering an assertion that seems to encourage us as what we are. As David B. Allison stresses in his book, Nietzsche’s is a voice that addresses us as a friend would: “like a friend who seems to share your every concern - and your aversions and suspicions as well. Like a true friend, he rarely tells you what you ought to do.”2 But Nietzsche here does tell us what we ought to do, if the coincident or already achieved paradox of his imperative keeps the tone of the command intimate. It is an inside piece of advice perfectly consonant with Allison’s point: Nietzsche takes us as we are. Yet taking his readers as his allies, as so many of his aphorisms seem to place us squarely on his own side, author and reader against the world - why doesn’t he simply come out and express this amiable loyalty to us, his readers, in some less ambiguous and more affirmative fashion? Be just as you are! Perfection! Ordinary, garden-variety, ethical or moral or practical imperatives urge us to alter our lives not to become what we (already) are but as ideal possibilities, contrary to immediate circumstances or fact, the idea is to become what we are not 1 Nehamas, Alexander: How One Becomes What One Is.
    [Show full text]
  • Beauty, Interpretation, and the Everyday: an Interview with Alexander Nehamas Robbie Kubala Columbia University
    Postgraduate Journal of Aesthetics, Vol. 9, No. 2, June 2012 BEAUTY , I NTERPRETATION , AND THE EVERYDAY : AN INTERVIEW WITH ALEXANDER NEHAMAS ROBBIE KUBALA COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY I. T HE SEMANTICS AND ONTOLOGY OF BEAUTY ROBBIE KUBALA : Many philosophers of art who identify with the analytic tradition tend today to think of beauty, when they do think of beauty, as one aesthetic quality among others. In a recent book on Functional Beauty , for example, the philosophers Glenn Parsons and Allen Carlson claim that the “avoidance of ‘beauty’ is generally a wise practice because the word is often taken to suggest a somewhat narrower notion than the term ‘aesthetic’ suggests.” 1 Why focus on beauty as opposed to the aesthetic more broadly? ALEXANDER NEHAMAS : I don’t think that beauty is a single specific quality. There may be such a thing – we could call it ‘prettiness’ or ‘good looks’, though such a feature changes with time and culture. Beauty, by contrast, is the most general quality that applies to everything—object or person—to which we are attracted and connects with objects and persons to whom we are attracted, where the attraction can range from a mild appeal to the most passionate love. Beauty, as Plato put it, is the object of love, and I 1 Parsons and Carlson (2008), p. xii. INTERVIEW WITH ALEXANDER NEHAMAS think that the most salient feature of our relationship to the arts and beauty in general is that all of us love something or other in the world. Everything that we love is something we find beautiful, and since what you and I find beautiful is bound to be different, it’s unlikely that beauty represents a single quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Transcript of “The Greeks: Crucible of Civilization” Episode Three: “Empire of the Mind”
    Transcript of “The Greeks: Crucible of Civilization” Episode Three: “Empire of the Mind” Transcript of PBS Video - The Greeks: Crucible of Civilization Part III: Empire of the Mind 0:00 – Episode Introduction Athens. The world’s first democracy. The most glorious city in ancient world, a city of wealth and power, center of a mighty naval empire. At the head of the state stood one man, a man who seemed to embody all of the Athenians’ achievements: Pericles. But Pericles now risked everything he and the Athenians had built in one great gamble, a war that he hoped would make Athens the undisputed ruler of the Mediterranean. This conflict would indeed transform Athens, but in a way that Pericles could never have imagined. It would make a common Athenian, Socrates, into the ruler of a new empire, an empire that remains the Greeks’ last great legacy, an empire of the mind A prison cell in the city of Athens. The year, 399 BC. Socrates, the world’s most famous philosopher, prepares for his execution. Around him lies a city ruined by war, a nation stripped of glory and empire, a people who have lost everything. Socrates is perhaps the one man who perhaps could have saved his fellow citizens from the greatest defeat in their history. Instead they have condemned him to death. How could the Athenians come to execute one of their most brilliant minds? How could they lose everything that had made them great? It is a tale that begins three decades before. 3:00 – Pericles’ Strategy for War with Sparta, 431 BC In the year 431 BC the city-state of Athens was the greatest power in the Mediterranean.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander Nehamas Τhe Art of Philosophy by a Real Philosopher
    14 FEATURE THE NATIONAL HERALD, MARCH 19-25, 2016 Alexander Nehamas Τhe Art of Philosophy by a Real Philosopher Alexander Nehamas is one of Nehamas has published sev - that, in order to learn, mostly by the most accredited and notable eral books such as: Nietzsche : rote, what will get them into uni - philosophers in the United Life as literature (Harvard Uni - versity only to be forgotten as States. An Edmund N. Carpenter versity Press, 1985), which has soon as university actually starts. II Class of 1943 Professor in Hu - since become a classic, Virtues “And what happens once the manities, Professor of Philoso - of Authenticity: Essays on Plato students pass their examinations phy, and Professor of Compara - and Socrates (Princeton Univer - and enter a university? Have you tive Literature at Princeton sity Press, 1998), The Art of Liv - taken a look at the physical plant University. ing: Socratic Reflections from of our universities, the ram - Ever since he was little, he Plato to Foucault (University of shackle buildings, the broken or was fascinated by Ancient California Press, 1998) and Only stolen equipment, the garbage Greece: by its literature, its art, a Promise of Happiness: The strewn all over the campus, in its philosophy, and its politics, Place of Beauty in the World Art corridors and classrooms, the which formed the center of his ( Princeton University Press, constant strikes, the physical at - education. As he says, “the 2007). tacks on professors by various legacy of the ancients, though, political organizations, the ‘oc - crucial as it has been to our sense ON FRIENDSHIP cupations’ of buildings by groups of ourselves as individuals and His latest book "On Friend - of students and administrative as people, is a double-edged ship," is forthcoming from Basic workers, the constant stealing of sword.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander Nehamas a Good Life: Friendship, Art and Truth Interview
    Conatus 2, no. 2 (2017): 115-121 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/conatus.15992 Alexander Nehamas A good life: Friendship, Art and Truth Interview Interview Coordinator: Despina Vertzagia1 Interviewers: Triseugene Georgakopoulou2, Jenny Pavlidou3, Katerina Plevridi4, Fotis Stamos5 E-mail addresses: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] In September 2017 Alexander Neha- mas1 kindly accepted our invitation to have a meeting in Athens in order to discuss several issues of philosoph- ical interest; with his latest publica- tion On Friendship (New York: Basic Books, 2016) as a starting point we soon moved over to a multitude of topics Nehamas has so far dealt with. The whole conversation spirals around the probably most challenging and de- manding issue as far as practical phi- losophy is concerned – yet one every moral agent needs to provide an ade- quate answer to during his lifetime: Values. Do they exclusively belong to the domain of morality? Nehamas claims that “although moral values […] are important […], they are not the only values that determine whether a life is or is not worthwhile”. This view inevitably shifts the focus from indi- vidual values - even fundamental ones such as friendship, art and truth - to the real issue: What is a good life, after all? 1 Alexander Nehamas is Edmund N. Carpenter II Class of 1943 Professor in the Humanities, Professor of Philosophy and Professor of Comparative Literature at the Department of Philosophy, Princeton University. [ 115 ] INTERVIEW: ALEXANDER NEHAMAS A GOOD LIFE: FRIENDSHIP, ART AND TRUTH CONATUS: Your interest in art and friendship is based on your belief that morality is not the only thing that matters for a truly good life.
    [Show full text]
  • Solicitude: Towards a Heideggerian Care Ethics-Of-Assistance" (2018)
    Fordham University Masthead Logo DigitalResearch@Fordham Articles and Chapters in Academic Book Philosophy Collections Fall 9-2018 Solicitude: Towards a Heideggerian Care Ethics-of- Assistance Babette Babich Fordham University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://fordham.bepress.com/phil_babich Part of the Applied Ethics Commons, Continental Philosophy Commons, Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons, and the Other Nursing Commons Recommended Citation Babich, Babette, "Solicitude: Towards a Heideggerian Care Ethics-of-Assistance" (2018). Articles and Chapters in Academic Book Collections. 91. https://fordham.bepress.com/phil_babich/91 This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the Philosophy at DigitalResearch@Fordham. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles and Chapters in Academic Book Collections by an authorized administrator of DigitalResearch@Fordham. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Solicitude: Towards a Heideggerian Care Ethics-of-Assistance Babette Babich What is the orientation of care if not to reinstate the human in his/her essence? - Heidegger, Letter on Humanism Friends and enemies Heidegger has been criticized for lacking an ethics, a point of view Heidegger himself highlights as perhaps the key to his well-known but elusive Letter on Humanism, a response offered in reply to a letter written to him after the war by Jean Beaufret, a scholar of ancient philosophy. Certainly, in this post-war era (where Sartre’s 1945 Paris lecture ‘Existentialism Is a Humanism’ sought to defend the ethical credentials of existentialism in the face of the charge of nihihsm) and more so today in the wake of the Black Notebooks scandal, Heidegger’s philosophy falters on ethical grounds as on political complications.
    [Show full text]