Who Are Kingdom Christians? “Kingdom Christian” Is a New Buzz Term Among Some Conservative Anabaptists and Others Who Hold a Similar Worldview

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Who Are Kingdom Christians? “Kingdom Christian” Is a New Buzz Term Among Some Conservative Anabaptists and Others Who Hold a Similar Worldview Who Are Kingdom Christians? “Kingdom Christian” is a new buzz term among some conservative Anabaptists and others who hold a similar worldview. The term has become popular in recent decades through the writings of David Bercot as a way to picture a Christian worldview throughout history that is larger than the Anabaptists, yet still be a term that would include Anabaptists. In the last decade or two, there is a new interest among conservative Anabaptists and other similar groups to rediscover what was commonly believed and practiced in the early church (AD 30-300). Learning about Anabaptism is good, but these folks want to be part of a faith tradition that is much larger and much older than one arising out of the Protestant Reformation. These folks have taken an interest in reading what Bercot and others refer to as the historic faith or kingdom Christianity. Conservative Anabaptists and their affiliates who use this term, generally define “kingdom Christians” as believers who practice non-resistance and returning good for evil; believers who are separated from the world and separated unto God; believers who practice modest dress and head-covering for women; and believers who don't participate in government/politics in a way that compromises New Testament teachings. Kingdom Christians are those who believe that allegiance to King Jesus requires a denouncing of allegiances to earthly entities and their ways of seeking power. They endeavor to give their time and talents to expanding God’s kingdom, nurturing a society of the redeemed, and helping to bring heaven to earth as pictured in the Lord ’s Prayer. These goals and practices are rooted in early church orthopraxy. Kingdom Christians also adhere to basic Christian orthodoxy, but many do not adhere to early church doctrine. Because of the diversity of faith traditions represented in the kingdom Christian description, there are many different beliefs on secondary and tertiary doctrines. Today there are Mennonite kingdom Christians, Church of Christ kingdom Christians, Followers of the Way kingdom Christians, Amish kingdom Christians, Brethren kingdom Christians, Apostolic kingdom Christians, and many more. Some folks who are inspired by the early Anabaptists (but aren’t particularly interested in being identified as Anabaptists) have started referring to themselves as “kingdom Christians.” These folks have not yet attempted any official affiliation with each other. Many of these people listen to recordings from Followers of the Way in Boston and attend events such as Kingdom Fellowship Weekend. It is important to differentiate the use of the term Kingdom Christian as a proper noun vs. its use as a descriptive term that includes anyone who believes in the importance of following Jesus, entering His Kingdom, and keeping His commands. There are many Christians around the world who practice some measure of non-resistance, non-conformity, and non-accumulation who may not have been influenced by Anabaptists. These folks qualify as kingdom Christians even if they never used that term to describe themselves. I have liked the term kingdom Christian. I think it is a good term to encapsulate all those Christians over the centuries who have lived and taught a clear practical expression of the two kingdoms. In recent years, the term Kingdom Christian seems to have become a proper noun (in some places) and is used to describe a movement that is happening at the edge of conservative Anabaptism. This in itself is not particularly alarming to me. However, it does appear that this movement is drawing in some people who are divisive, sectarian, egotistical, and/or antinomian. If I am correct about this, then significant portions of this movement are headed for trouble. 1 When leaders manifest the above characteristics, you will see self-appointed authorities going around the country and around the world, supporting people in leaving their churches, stealing sheep, and planting their own “dealership” in other churches’ back yards. This kind of “dealership planting” has been happening among Anabaptists in North America, ever since John Oberholtzer organized the General Conference Mennonite Church in 1860. Because of this, the day may come when I will no longer feel comfortable using the term kingdom Christian. Needing to part with a term is sad, but it is not a new problem. Terms for describing Christians are only so good until someone ruins the term for everybody else. For example, just ahead of the 2016 presidential election, John MacArthur and Al Mohler were lamenting the fact that “another good term” (Evangelical) had been ruined. They were referring to people who self-identified as Evangelical, but were campaigning loudly for a presidential candidate who was a very immoral man. Mennonites and Anabaptists have felt something similar when liberals hijacked the terms Mennonite and Anabaptist during the 20th century. Even the word Christian got hijacked in the fourth century whenever the church merged with the state and began taking up the sword in the name of Christ. Many kingdom Christian churches have tended to be less stable due to unaccountable leaders, incompetent leaders, questionable doctrine or church polity, relational immaturity, internal disagreements, lack of unified vision, and individuals leaving because of unnecessary offenses. Sometimes kingdom Christians struggle among themselves to identify which early church and which early Anabaptist beliefs and practices should be made normative in the church and which ones are unnecessary or a deviation from what God intends to be normative for the church today. (Not all kingdom Christian groups have these problems but many have one or more of them.) In some places there is a complete melt down or disintegration of the group. If leaders in these types of settings are not uniquely suited for the job, the church tends to flounder and some churches go extinct. Some seekers, after experiencing difficulties in an unstable church, will join a more traditional Anabaptist group. They are willing to put up with some unhandy cultural traditions in order to have a more stable environment for themselves or their family. Others will choose to return to their Augustinian roots. I as an Anabaptist kingdom Christian find this latter option disheartening. While some kingdom Christians think of themselves as offering the world the best church experience possible, peacemaking kingdom Christians are able to recognize their own weaknesses and seek to encourage believers to greater faithfulness and greater obedience to Christ in a variety of churches. While some kingdom Christians are glad to take members away from churches they deem less spiritual or less scriptural, peacemakers are glad to support and strengthen the things that remain among people who are sincerely attempting to follow the teachings of the New Testament. Peacemakers are typically interested in seeing the Kingdom of God expand and encompass the earth, and they are not eager to draw people and talent away from other churches, missions, or ministries. While they may draw lines for who they allow to be in position of influence in their congregations, they would not condemn or isolate themselves from those who take a different stance on secondary or tertiary issues. I am encouraged to see kingdom Christian fellowships springing up around the world in faith traditions not associated with Anabaptists. But these efforts do not come without a unique set of challenges. February 2020 | Ernest Eby 2 .
Recommended publications
  • Hath God Said? Emergent Church Theology
    Hath God Said? Emergent Church Theology ELLIOTT NESCH Hath God Said? Emergent Church Theology Copyright © 2014 by Elliott Nesch. 3rd edition. All rights reserved. www.HolyBibleProphecy.org ISBN-13: 978-0615861432 ISBN-10: 0615861431 Cover design: Mark Karis Acknowledgements Above all I want to thank my wife, Harmony, for her help in our home and in ministry. I want to thank my brothers in Christ, especially David Valderrama and Dennis Maloy, who offered wise counsel and helpful suggestions for the content of this book. I would like to express my gratitude to Linda VonBergen for editing this third edition. Thanks to Bob DeWaay, Gary Gilley, Phil Johnson, Robert LeBus, Eric Ludy, Jay Peters, Chris Rosebrough, Joe Schimmel, James Sundquist, Ray Yungen for their research and participation in my documentary film The Real Roots of the Emergent Church. David Bercot's A Dictionary of Early Christian Beliefs has been a very useful tool of reference for the writing of this book. Thanks to Mark Karis for designing the book cover. CONTENTS Preface i Introduction iii The “New Christians” 1 The Postmodern Rejection of Absolute Truth 27 Changing the Message 54 Questioning the Scriptures 69 Muddling God's Clarity 87 Women Rule Over Them 97 Queermergent 125 A Place Called Hell 151 Contemplative Mysticism 177 Eschatology of Hope 203 A Better Atonement 216 Another Jesus 237 Another Gospel 251 The Kingdom of God 271 HATH GOD SAID? EMERGENT CHURCH THEOLOGY Preface This book was written out of a growing burden for the professing and visible church which is emerging into something new.
    [Show full text]
  • Response to Accusations Against Anabaptists
    Response to Accusations Against Anabaptists Anabaptists are not monolithic. In other words, one cannot say that all Anabaptists believe such and such. Actually the movement is quite diverse, from very liberal Anabaptists who support abortion and homosexuality (like some in the Mennonite Church USA) to very conservative Anabaptists (like the Old Order Amish). Obviously, we cannot group all of the teachings of Anabaptists together and say that all Anabaptists believe such and such. In fact there are many "Anabaptists" who embrace much of what Protestant theology teaches. (By the way, the term Anabaptist literally means "re-baptizers" and it refers to the groups during the time of the Protestant Reformation who rejected their infant baptism and were re- baptized as adults.) For the sake of clarity, when I use the term "Anabaptist," I am using it to refer to those who would describe themselves more as "Kingdom Christians." For a description of what a Kingdom Christian is, please go to the link below: Scroll Publishing - What is a Kingdom Christian Kingdom Christians would include people such as David Bercot, Finny Kuruvilla, Dean Taylor, John D. Martin, David Robertson, Dale Heisey, and Ernest Eby. This is a specific subset of Anabaptism that I identify with and whose views I can fairly well summarize and generalize. Accusation: Anabaptists teach that God changed his mind with respect to things like swearing oaths. Response: Anabaptists would say that the New Covenant is not God changing his mind so much as it is God revealing his ultimate plan for his people. God permitted certain things in former times, which have now been set aside with the perfect revelation of God’s will in Christ.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Christian Writers on Apostasy and Perseverance
    Early Christian Writers on Apostasy and Perseverance In putting together this article I started by first reading from the reference work—A Dictionary of Early Christian Beliefs: A Reference Guide to More Than 700 Topics Discussed by the Early Church Fathers.1 Patristic scholar David Bercot is the editor of this work, and under the topic “Salvation” there are several subheadings, with number six being “Can those who are saved ever be lost?” The following Scriptures are quoted: The LORD is with you when you are with him. If you seek him, he will be found by you, but if you forsake him, he will forsake you. (2 Chronicles 15:2) The righteousness of a righteous man shall not deliver him in the day of his transgression. (Ezekiel 33:12) You will be hated by all for My name’s sake. But he who endures to the end will be saved. (Matthew 10:22) Jesus said to him, “No one, having put his hand to the plow, and looking back, is fit for the kingdom of God.” (Luke 9:62) If we endure, we shall also reign with Him; if we deny Him, He also will deny us. (2 Timothy 2:12) If we sin willfully after we have received the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins, but a certain fearful expectation of judgment. (Hebrews 10:26) For if, after they have escaped the pollutions of the world through the knowledge of the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, they are again entangled in them and are overcome, the last end is worse for them than the beginning.
    [Show full text]
  • The Persecution of Christians During the Revolutionary War
    Fidei et Veritatis: The Liberty University Journal of Graduate Research Volume 1 Issue 1 Article 7 2016 Radicals in the Revolution: The Persecution of Christians During the Revolutionary War Kevan D. Keane Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/fidei_et_veritatis Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Keane, Kevan D. (2016) "Radicals in the Revolution: The Persecution of Christians During the Revolutionary War," Fidei et Veritatis: The Liberty University Journal of Graduate Research: Vol. 1 : Iss. 1 , Article 7. Available at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/fidei_et_veritatis/vol1/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fidei et Veritatis: The Liberty University Journal of Graduate Research by an authorized editor of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Keane: Radicals in the Revolution: The Persecution of Christians During RADICALS IN THE REVOLUATION: THE PERSECUTION OF CHRISTIANS DURING THE REVOLUTIONARY WAR By Kevan D. Keane This paper explores the plight of radical Christians in Pennsylvania during the American Revolution. Pennsylvania, up until the American Revolution, was governed by Quakers, and home to people of many denominational backgrounds, including various Anabaptist sects, such as the Amish, Mennonites, and Brethren. Both Quakers and Anabaptists adhered to the most conservative interpretation of Jesus’s teachings on not resisting an evil person (Matthew 5:38-42) and the swearing of oaths (Matthew 5:33-37). When Protestant revolutionaries took over the Pennsylvania government during the War, they required all residents of Pennsylvania to take an oath of allegiance to the Colony.
    [Show full text]
  • A Socio-Religious Introduction to the Apostolic Churches in North America
    Journal of Amish and Plain Anabaptist Studies Volume 6 Issue 1 Special section: The Apostolic Christian Article 3 / Nazarene Churches 2018 A Socio-Religious Introduction to the Apostolic Churches in North America Cory Anderson Follow this and additional works at: https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/amishstudies Part of the Sociology Commons Please take a moment to share how this work helps you through this survey. Your feedback will be important as we plan further development of our repository. Recommended Citation Anderson, Cory. 2018. "A Socio-Religious Introduction to the Apostolic Churches in North America." Journal of Amish and Plain Anabaptist Studies 6(1):26-60. This Original Research Article is brought to you for free and open access by IdeaExchange@UAkron, the institutional repository of The University of Akron in Akron, Ohio, USA. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Amish and Plain Anabaptist Studies by an authorized administrator of IdeaExchange@UAkron. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. A Socio-Religious Introduction to the Apostolic Churches in North America Cory Anderson Assistant Professor of Sociology and Geography Department of Society and Environment Truman State University Research Associate Department of Plant Pathology The Ohio State University—Ohio Agricultural Research & Development Center Abstract The Apostolic Christian Churches descend from the religious revivals instigated under the leadership of Samuel Fröhlich in 1830s Switzerland. Fusing Anabaptist thought into his revival through contact with Mennonites, Fröhlich’s movement constitutes a distinct religious tradition within the larger Anabaptist movement. Research about this Anabaptist tradition has remained sparse. This article helps introduce the Apostolics to a scholarly audience.
    [Show full text]
  • Sabbath, Sunday, Or…?
    Sabbath, Sunday, Or…? by Bernie Koerselman Table of Contents Part I.................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 2 God’s Command to New Testament Believers .............................................................................................. 3 Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath....................................................................................................................... 3 Jesus Taught Healing (Helping) On the Sabbath ....................................................................................... 3 Jesus Admitted Working on the Sabbath ................................................................................................... 4 Sabbatarian Arguments Defending Sabbath-Keeping.................................................................................... 4 Sabbatarians Say Jesus is Author of Old Testament Law.......................................................................... 4 Sabbatarians Say Jesus Said the Law Will Last......................................................................................... 5 Sabbatarians Say Blessings and Curses Show Law In Effect .................................................................... 5 “The Law” vs. Christ’s Law..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Anticalvin the Myth of Original
    Table of Contents Myth of Original Sin Origins: Setting the Stage: The Turning Point: Who are the Real Heretics? Myth of Original Sin By Mike Desario (http://standingthegap.org/) Almost without exception the evangelical Christian world believes that forgiveness of sins and Salvation can be had by praying a simple prayer to God, confessing your sinfulness and Receiving Jesus as your personal Savior. So much so that the entire church world today measures their success or failure against how many people they can persuade into praying the prayer. If many respond to the invitation they are pronounced Saved and forgiven of sins, taken into the church and taught that God will someday ‘clean’ them up and they will be able to live a better life than before. Although the sin never really stops (and this includes ALL sin: fornication, molestation, adultery, drunkenness) it will in time become less and less as you learn to cope with your sinful nature through the application of His Grace. No one questions this formula or tries to alter it to a more Biblical perspective, although NOTHING in Scripture garners it any support. In the Bible the Procedure is simply: Repentance and Faith.. Repentance Proven by Deeds and Faith Working by Love. But no one seems to care. They gauge everything off the formula and even those who tend to use the correct terminology (mentioning repentance and faith) still hold that Real Salvation can be had using the formals. (Otherwise they would abandon them as false!). This applies to their understanding of Revival as well.
    [Show full text]
  • AIM Resource Document May 15, 2021
    AIM RESOURCES 2020-2022 16 MAY 2021 MAIN SERIES 9. Counseling & Psychology 10. Church History 1. New Testament Survey 11. Homiletics 2. New Testament Interpretation 12. Worldviews + Practical Ministry (summer series) 3. Spiritual Life 4. Doctrine / Holy Spirit AIM+ 5. Apologetics / Evangelism 1. Practical Ministry 6. Old Testament Survey 2. Missions / Church Planting + Missions / Church Planting (summer series) 3. N.T. Interpretation—Hebrews 7. Family Life 4. O.T. Interpretation—Amos 8. Old Testament Interpretation 5. Christ & Culture (1) NEW TESTAMENT SURVEY (Dec 2019-Mar 2020) Required: 1. The entire N.T., in a version that is not your preferred translation. Must be read in the 12 months before the conclusion of NTS. 2. Book: Douglas Jacoby, A Quick Overview of the Bible, chapters 16-23 (Spring, TX: Illumination Publishers, 2019). Also available as an e-book (Kindle). 3. Bible Project: Watch 20 short videos (to be specified once you’ve registered for the course). Each video is 5- 10 minutes long. Keep a log and take notes—to be presented to your instructor(s). 4. iFaith: Watch 135 minutes of iFaith video sermons from the New Testament. For example, nos. 2-9, 20-27, and 32-35. Note that the short introductory videos do not count (nos. 1, 19, 31, etc). Each video sermon is 13-15 minutes. Keep a log and take notes—to be presented to your instructor(s). The general link is https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTipLYSAbO2OLLNjSZG43sIg4cYNjOqja. 5. Classes at North River (or virtually), on Saturday 1 February. Session 9:30-1:00. 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Christian Order Or the Remnant? Where Does the Pilgrim Church Fit in the Christian Landscape?
    Church Planter’s Forum and Retreat 2017 Christian Order or The Remnant? Where does the Pilgrim Church fit in the Christian landscape? The word forum suggests that there are some things in life for which there are no simple answers. My observation is that the churches and communities who are successful long term are those in which the founders go into the endeavor with their eyes fully open, with a healthy sense of reality and a good dose of humility. Anyone who goes into church planting thinking that the Lord is going to somehow cover over all of man’s mistakes, is going to be in for a surprise. A forum suggests that some things in life need various perspectives in order for us to better see and understand the truth. Here is an illustration for how I see this working… If I tried throwing this ping pong ball all the way to the kitchen door, I wouldn’t get it there. But if all of you were spread out between here and the kitchen, we could get it there! I’d get it started, different ones of you would give it a little kick and before long we could get this ball to the kitchen. That is what I would like to see happen at these church planters forums over the next several decades. I would like to see us all work together at this until we reach our goal for church planting. (This idea of working together at something like this is a very central Anabaptist concept by the way.) Whenever there is a health epidemic, there are multiple research teams working simultaneously at finding a solution for the problem.
    [Show full text]
  • Born of Water
    BORN OF WATER BORN OF WATER ^]^] What the Bible Really Says About Baptism Third Edition Rex Geissler Great Commission Illustrated Highlands Ranch, CO WWW: http://greatcommission.com All Scripture quotations unless indicated are taken from the NEW AMERICAN STANDARD BIBLE®, Copyright ©1960,1962,1963,1968,1971,1972,1973,1975,1977,1995 by The Lockman Foundation. Used by permission. Born of Water What the Bible Really Says About Baptism © 1996, 1998, 2005 by Rex Geissler Appendix C © 1998 by John Engler, Highlands Ranch, CO All rights are reserved. No part of this book may be duplicated, copied, translated, printed for resale, or reproduced without specific, written permission of the author. Published by Great Commission Illustrated. Printed in the United States of America March 2005 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publications Data Front and back cover graphic design by William To Photograph of the author baptizing a friend in Boulder Creek, Colorado taken by Shirley Desmond Jackson ISBN 0-9653469-0-0 Dedication ^]^] I would like to dedicate this book to the search for doctrinal truth, historical accuracy, and intellectual honesty. To every Apollos around the world with the zeal to teach the truth, the heart to change their life, and the intellectual honesty to accept a new teaching. To my dad and mom, Carl & Marion Geissler, who not only gave me life, but also gave me every opportunity in life to be the best I could be. To my spiritual parents, Harold “Shu” and Carol Shumaker, who taught me the word of God and showed me the true meaning of life.
    [Show full text]
  • Evangelical Review of Theology Reflect the Opinions of the Authors and Reviewers and Do Not Necessarily Represent Those of the Editor Or Publisher
    EVANGELICAL REVIEW OF THEOLOGY VOLUME 24 Articles and book reviews original and selected from publications worldwide for an international readership for the purpose of discerning the obedience of faith EDITOR: DAVID PARKER Published by PATERNOSTER PERIODICALS for WORLD EVANGELICAL FELLOWSHIP Theological Commission Volume 24 • Number 1 • January 2000 Evangelical Review of Theology ISSN: 0144–8153 Vol. 24 No. 1 January 2000 Copyright © 2000 World Evangelical Fellowship Editor David Parker Committee The Executive Committee of the WEF Theological Commission Dr Rolf Hille, Executive Chair Executive Director Dr. James Stamoolis 814 W. Hawthorne Blvd. Wheaton, IL 60187 USA Phone: +1 630 690–7082 Fax: +1 630 690–0660 E-mail: [email protected] Editorial Policy The articles in the Evangelical Review of Theology reflect the opinions of the authors and reviewers and do not necessarily represent those of the Editor or Publisher. Manuscripts, reports and communications should be addressed to the Editor and sent to WEF International Office, 141 Middle Road, #05–05 GSM Building , Singapore 188976 The Editors welcome recommendations of original or published articles or book reviews that relate to forthcoming issues for inclusion in the Review. Please send clear copies of details to the above address. Editorial 2 Students of church history are well aware that the early centuries of the church have been known as the ‘age of persecution’ but what is becoming clear is that persecution is a major problem at the present time as well. In fact, reports indicate that more people were martyred for their faith in Jesus Christ in the 20th century than in all the previous nineteen combined.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eschatological Worldview of C. Peter Wagner and the New Apostolic Reformation
    The eschatological worldview of C. Peter Wagner and the New Apostolic Reformation Rev. David Woodfield M.Th. 0000-0003-3059-7058 Thesis submitted for the degree Master of Arts in Dogmatics at the Potchefstroom Campus of the North-West University in co-operation with Greenwich School of Theology Supervisor: Prof Dr R Gilbrant Co-Supervisor: Prof Dr N Vorster April 2017 ABSTRACT This dissertation is an evaluation of the theology of prolific writer and missiologist, C. Peter Wagner, and his role and influence in identifying the emergence of the ‘New Apostolic Reformation’ (NAR). Wagner, the iconic ‘father figure’ of the NAR has been declaring for some two decades that the global church has entered, what he describes as, the ‘Second Apostolic Age’ and, that “we are now witnessing the most radical change in the way of doing church since the Protestant Reformation” (1998: 16-17). In essence, he is convinced that the 16th century Reformation has not yet completed its objectives and continues to add revelationary truth to the Church today. The most distinctive and fundamental feature of the NAR is its ecclesiological emphasis on the restoration of apostolic authority within the contemporary Church with the same governmental authority that functioned through the New Testament apostolate; it is from this foundation that all other NAR theological viewpoints stem. Writing from a classical Pentecostal standpoint this study seeks to discover whether it is plausible that the Church has actually entered a ‘Second Apostolic Age’ and, what factors led Wagner to his conclusion that a ‘New Apostolic Reformation’ has been birthed. In order to evaluate the teachings and praxis of the NAR, a literary and exegetical analysis will be undertaken by means of comparison with the theological position as defined, by the Fundamental Truths of the Elim Pentecostal Church (Elim Directory, 2015: 6) the denomination, with which the writer holds ministerial credentials.
    [Show full text]