DOCSLIB.ORG

Peoria BRT Final Report 11/2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Peoria BRT Final Report 11/2013 Peoria/Riverside Corridor Transit Study: an Alternatives Analysis Final Alternatives Analysis Report November 13, 2013 Prepared for: Indian Nations Council of Governments (INCOG) Prepared by: Jacobs Engineering 10001 Broadway Extension Oklahoma City, OK 73114 (405) 810-8254 Table of Contents 1 | Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Study Area Description ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose & Need .............................................................................................................................................................. 3 Alternative Development and Preliminary Screening .................................................................................................. 3 Detailed Screening of Alternatives ............................................................................................................................. 12 Selection of Recommended Alternative .................................................................................................................... 15 Implementation Strategy ............................................................................................................................................. 16 2 | Project Background ............................................................................................................................................. 19 Overview ........................................................................................................................................................................ 19 Regional Planning Context .......................................................................................................................................... 19 Other Studies ................................................................................................................................................................ 20 3 | Peoria/Riverside Corridor (PRC) Description .................................................................................................... 23 Regional Significance .................................................................................................................................................. 23 Corridor Segmentation ................................................................................................................................................ 25 4 | Purpose and Need ............................................................................................................................................... 26 Overview ........................................................................................................................................................................ 26 The Transportation Problem ....................................................................................................................................... 26 Purpose and Need of Transit Improvements ............................................................................................................ 27 5 | Alternative Development ..................................................................................................................................... 32 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................. 32 Overview ........................................................................................................................................................................ 32 Development of Preliminary Alternatives .................................................................................................................. 33 Alternatives Analysis Approach ................................................................................................................................... 35 6 | Public Involvement .............................................................................................................................................. 37 Overview ........................................................................................................................................................................ 37 Public Outreach Methodology ..................................................................................................................................... 37 7 | Preliminary Screening and Refinement of Alternatives ................................................................................... 42 | i Overview ........................................................................................................................................................................ 42 Preliminary Screening of Alternatives ........................................................................................................................ 42 Refined Alternatives ..................................................................................................................................................... 50 8 | Potential Impacts to Existing Conditions ........................................................................................................... 55 Overview ........................................................................................................................................................................ 55 Infrastructure Impacts ................................................................................................................................................. 55 Operational Impacts .................................................................................................................................................... 64 Summary of Potential Impacts ................................................................................................................................... 66 9 | Financial Feasibility ............................................................................................................................................. 68 Overview ........................................................................................................................................................................ 68 Scope of Improvements .............................................................................................................................................. 69 Uncertainties in Project Scope .................................................................................................................................... 74 Capital Cost Estimate Summary ................................................................................................................................. 76 Operations and Maintenance Costs ........................................................................................................................... 76 10 | Evaluation of Refined Alternatives ................................................................................................................. 85 Overview ........................................................................................................................................................................ 85 Evaluation Methodology .............................................................................................................................................. 85 Application of Evaluation Criteria ............................................................................................................................... 87 Evaluation Results ....................................................................................................................................................... 90 Recommended Alternative .......................................................................................................................................... 92 11 | Implementation................................................................................................................................................ 96 Overview ........................................................................................................................................................................ 96 Deployment of Recommended Alternative ................................................................................................................ 96 Project Scoping ............................................................................................................................................................. 96 Preliminary Environmental Coordination ................................................................................................................... 97 Financing Opportunities and Governance ................................................................................................................. 98 Transit Supportive Land Use Coordination .............................................................................................................. 101 List of Figures Figure 1: PRC Corridor Study Area ....................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • From the 1832 Horse Pulled Tramway to 21Th Century Light Rail Transit/Light Metro Rail - a Short History of the Evolution in Pictures
    From the 1832 Horse pulled Tramway to 21th Century Light Rail Transit/Light Metro Rail - a short History of the Evolution in Pictures By Dr. F.A. Wingler, September 2019 Animation of Light Rail Transit/ Light Metro Rail INTRODUCTION: Light Rail Transit (LRT) or Light Metro Rail (LMR) Systems operates with Light Rail Vehicles (LRV). Those Light Rail Vehicles run in urban region on Streets on reserved or unreserved rail tracks as City Trams, elevated as Right-of-Way Trams or Underground as Metros, and they can run also suburban and interurban on dedicated or reserved rail tracks or on main railway lines as Commuter Rail. The invest costs for LRT/LMR are less than for Metro Rail, the diversity is higher and the adjustment to local conditions and environment is less complicated. Whereas Metro Rail serves only certain corridors, LRT/LRM can be installed with dense and branched networks to serve wider areas. 1 In India the new buzzword for LRT/LMR is “METROLIGHT” or “METROLITE”. The Indian Central Government proposes to run light urban metro rail ‘Metrolight’ or Metrolite” for smaller towns of various states. These transits will operate in places, where the density of people is not so high and a lower ridership is expected. The Light Rail Vehicles will have three coaches, and the speed will be not much more than 25 kmph. The Metrolight will run along the ground as well as above on elevated structures. Metrolight will also work as a metro feeder system. Its cost is less compared to the metro rail installations.
    [Show full text]
  • TULSA OFFICE (918) 587-0000 • Mcafeetaft.Com
    Williams Center Tower II • Two W Second Street Suite 1100 • Tulsa, OK 74103 TULSA OFFICE (918) 587-0000 • mcafeetaft.com Located on the southeast corner of Second Street and Boulder Avenue in downtown Tulsa, the 23-story Williams Center Tower II serves as home to McAfee & Taft’s Tulsa office. It is conveniently located within walking distance of the Federal Courthouse, Tulsa County Courthouse, BOK Center, and numerous hotels and restaurants. Complimentary on-site covered parking is provided for visitors on client-related business matters. Visitors to the firm can find metered parking on adjacent streets and in public parking garages and surface lots to the north and east of Williams Center Tower II on W. Second Street. DIRECTIONS FROM TULSA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT: As you exit the airport, take Airport Drive to Gilcrease Expressway (OK-11). Turn right onto Gilcrease Expressway, heading westbound to US-75. Take US-75 south to the 1st Street exit. Follow 1st Street to Cheyenne Avenue. Turn left onto Cheyenne Avenue. Follow Cheyenne Avenue one block to 2nd Street. Turn left onto 2nd Street and proceed past Boulder Avenue, Williams Center Tower II is on the right. DIRECTIONS FROM WEST I-44 (FROM OKLAHOMA CITY) As you approach the I-44/I-244 junction in Tulsa, take I-244 E toward Downtown Tulsa. Take Exit 4C for 7th Street toward Downtown. Follow 7th Street then shift left onto 6th Street. Turn left onto Boulder Avenue to 2nd Street. Turn right onto 2nd Street and Williams Center Tower II is on the right. DIRECTIONS FROM EAST I-44 (FROM WILL ROGERS TURNPIKE, VINITA AND MIAMI, OK): As you approach Tulsa, I-44 merges with US 412.
    [Show full text]
  • Discussion on Applicability and Train of Thought of Urban Small
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE Discussion on Applicability and Train of Thought of Urban Small Capacity Rail Transit Development Yuan Wang* Ningbo University of Technology, Ningbo 315211, Zhejiang, China. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: In recent years, small and medium-sized cities have built rail transit to meet the growing travel needs of residents that gain popularity. Among them, small capacity rail transit has been widely used in many cities across the country due to its short construction period, low cost and strong adaptability. This article introduces the classification and characteristics of urban small capacity rail transit. Moreover, it discusses the applicability of small capacity rail transit development based on the current development of urban rail. This article claims that the direction of its development ideas in the future is more strengths, more smart, more standardized and coordination development with multiple types. Keywords: Small and Medium Cities; Small Traffic Capacity; Rail Transit; Applicability 1. Introduction With the development of China's economy and society, urban rail transit construction has become a trend. As the skeleton of urban public transportation, rail transit has the advantages of high arrival rate, high punctuality rate, clean and comfortable riding environment, and therefore driving urban economic development. However, the construction of large-capacity rail transit has high cost and long construction period. In some small and medium-sized cities, due to population aggregation, travel capacity, and economic constraints, the construction of large capacity rail transit has obviously caused the city's economic burden and resource waste. Therefore, for small and medium-sized cities, the proper construction of small capacity rail transit has become a reasonable choice.
    [Show full text]
  • Report for Greenwood District Tulsa, Tulsa County, Oklahoma
    REPORT FOR GREENWOOD DISTRICT TULSA, TULSA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA The 100-block of North Greenwood Avenue, June 1921, Mary E. Jones Parrish Collection, Oklahoma Historical Society PREPARED FOR THE INDIAN NATIONS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS, ON BEHALF OF THE TULSA PRESERVATION COMMISSION, CITY OF TULSA 2 WEST 2ND STREET, SUITE 800, TULSA, OKLAHOMA 74103 BY PRESERVATION AND DESIGN STUDIO PLLC 616 NW 21ST STREET, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73103 MAY 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Abstract ...................................................................................................4 2 Introduction ..............................................................................................6 3 Research Design .......................................................................................9 4 Project Objectives ....................................................................................9 5 Methodology ............................................................................................10 6 Expected Results ......................................................................................13 7 Area Surveyed ..........................................................................................14 8 Historic Context .......................................................................................18 9 Survey Results .........................................................................................27 10 Bibliography ............................................................................................36 APPENDICES Appendix
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Bibliography of Light Rail Transit*
    An Annotated U.S. Department of Transportation Bibliography of September 1981 Light Rail ·Transit z 7164 Prepared for .T8 California L57 Department of Transportation AN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY OF LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT* *Light rail transit is a mode of urban transportation utilizing predominantly reserved but not necessarily grade-separated rights of way. Electrically propelled rail vehicles operate singly or in trains. LRT provides a wide range of passenger capabilities and performance characteristics at moderate costs. (Definition from Light Rail Transit: A State of the Art Review, U.S. Department of Transportation, Spring 1976.) September 1981 State of California Department of Transportation Prepared by Division of Transportation Planning ~.C.R.T.D. llBRARY z 7164 -TB L57 Table of Contents Introduction ............................... ii General References ...................................... 1 Glossaries . 2 Periodicals •• .. 3 Advanced Systems ••••••••••••••• . ... 4 Bibliography and Documentation ••••••••••••••.•••••• 6 Economics ••••••• . .. 7 Electrification ••••.•••. 10 Energy ..................... 11 Environmental Protection ••••••• . ... 12 Government Policy, Planning, and Regulation •••••••• . ... 16 History •••••••••• 18 Hum~n Factors •••••••••••••••••••.•••••••••••••••• 22 Industry Structure and Company Management 23 Passenger Operations •••••••••••••••• Cos ts ••.•••••••••••••••••••. 25 Fares and Revenue Collection 28 Intermodal Integration 36 Land Use and Development ••.•••.••••• 39 Level of Service ••• 42 Marketing .....................
    [Show full text]
  • HS Social Studies Distance Learning Activities
    HS Social Studies (Oklahoma History/Government) Distance Learning Activities TULSA PUBLIC SCHOOLS Dear families, These learning packets are filled with grade level activities to keep students engaged in learning at home. We are following the learning routines with language of instruction that students would be engaged in within the classroom setting. We have an amazing diverse language community with over 65 different languages represented across our students and families. If you need assistance in understanding the learning activities or instructions, we recommend using these phone and computer apps listed below. Google Translate • Free language translation app for Android and iPhone • Supports text translations in 103 languages and speech translation (or conversation translations) in 32 languages • Capable of doing camera translation in 38 languages and photo/image translations in 50 languages • Performs translations across apps Microsoft Translator • Free language translation app for iPhone and Android • Supports text translations in 64 languages and speech translation in 21 languages • Supports camera and image translation • Allows translation sharing between apps 3027 SOUTH NEW HAVEN AVENUE | TULSA, OKLAHOMA 74114 918.746.6800 | www.tulsaschools.org TULSA PUBLIC SCHOOLS Queridas familias: Estos paquetes de aprendizaje tienen actividades a nivel de grado para mantener a los estudiantes comprometidos con la educación en casa. Estamos siguiendo las rutinas de aprendizaje con las palabras que se utilizan en el salón de clases. Tenemos
    [Show full text]
  • Passenger Rail Service Comfortability in Kuala Lumpur Urban Transit System
    MATEC Web of Conferences 47, 003 11 (2016) DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201647003 11 C Owned by the authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2016 Passenger Rail Service Comfortability in Kuala Lumpur Urban Transit System 1 1,a 2 3 Noor Hafiza Nordin , Mohd Idrus Mohd Masirin , Mohd Imran Ghazali and Muhammad Isom Azis 1Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussien Onn Malaysia, 86400 Parit Raja, Johor, Malaysia 2Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussien Onn Malaysia, 86400 Parit Raja, Johor, Malaysia 3Prasarana Negara Berhad, 59000 Bangsar, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Abstract. Rail transit transportation system is among the public transportation network in Kuala Lumpur City. Some important elements in establishing this system are ticket price, operation cost, maintenance implications, service quality and passenger’s comfortability. The level of passenger’s comfortability in the coach is important to be considered by the relevant authorities and system operators in order to provide comfort and safety to passengers. The objective this research is to study some parameters that impact the comfortability of passengers and to obtain feedbacks from passengers for different rail transit system. Site observations were conducted to obtain data such as noise, vibration, speed and coach layouts which will be verified by using the passenger feedback outcomes. The research will be focused in and around the Kuala Lumpur City for the duration of 10 months. Four rail transit systems were being considered, i.e. Train Type A (LRA), Train Type B (LRB), Train Type C (MRL) and Train Type D (CTR). Data parameters obtained from field observations were conducted in the rail coaches during actual operation using apparatus among others the sound level meter (SLM), vibration analyzer (VA) and the global positioning system (GPS).
    [Show full text]
  • Design of Bus Bridging Routes in Response to Disruption of Urban Rail Transit
    sustainability Article Design of Bus Bridging Routes in Response to Disruption of Urban Rail Transit Yajuan Deng 1,*, Xiaolei Ru 2, Ziqi Dou 3 and Guohua Liang 4 1 Department of Traffic Engineering, School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China 2 The Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering, Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China; [email protected] 3 Department of Transportation Management Engineering, School of Traffic and Transportation, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China; [email protected] 4 Department of Traffic Engineering, School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 30 September 2018; Accepted: 23 November 2018; Published: 27 November 2018 Abstract: Bus bridging has been widely used to connect stations affected by urban rail transit disruptions. This paper designs bus bridging routes for passengers in case of urban rail transit disruption. The types of urban rail transit disruption between Origin-Destination stations are summarized, and alternative bus bridging routes are listed. First, the feasible route generation method is established. Feasible routes for each pair of the disruption Origin-Destination stations include urban rail transit transfer, direct bus bridging, and indirect bus bridging. Then the feasible route generation model with the station capacity constraint is established. The k-short alternative routes are generated to form the bus bridging routes. Lastly, by considering the bus bridging resource constraints, the final bus bridging routes are obtained by merging and filtering the initial bridging routes. Numerical results of an illustrative network show that the bus bridging routes generated from the proposed model can significantly reduce travel delay of blocked passengers, and it is necessary to maintain the number of passengers in the urban rail transit below the station capacity threshold for ensuring a feasible routing design.
    [Show full text]
  • The Urban Rail Development Handbook
    DEVELOPMENT THE “ The Urban Rail Development Handbook offers both planners and political decision makers a comprehensive view of one of the largest, if not the largest, investment a city can undertake: an urban rail system. The handbook properly recognizes that urban rail is only one part of a hierarchically integrated transport system, and it provides practical guidance on how urban rail projects can be implemented and operated RAIL URBAN THE URBAN RAIL in a multimodal way that maximizes benefits far beyond mobility. The handbook is a must-read for any person involved in the planning and decision making for an urban rail line.” —Arturo Ardila-Gómez, Global Lead, Urban Mobility and Lead Transport Economist, World Bank DEVELOPMENT “ The Urban Rail Development Handbook tackles the social and technical challenges of planning, designing, financing, procuring, constructing, and operating rail projects in urban areas. It is a great complement HANDBOOK to more technical publications on rail technology, infrastructure, and project delivery. This handbook provides practical advice for delivering urban megaprojects, taking account of their social, institutional, and economic context.” —Martha Lawrence, Lead, Railway Community of Practice and Senior Railway Specialist, World Bank HANDBOOK “ Among the many options a city can consider to improve access to opportunities and mobility, urban rail stands out by its potential impact, as well as its high cost. Getting it right is a complex and multifaceted challenge that this handbook addresses beautifully through an in-depth and practical sharing of hard lessons learned in planning, implementing, and operating such urban rail lines, while ensuring their transformational role for urban development.” —Gerald Ollivier, Lead, Transit-Oriented Development Community of Practice, World Bank “ Public transport, as the backbone of mobility in cities, supports more inclusive communities, economic development, higher standards of living and health, and active lifestyles of inhabitants, while improving air quality and liveability.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 233/Monday, December 4, 2000
    Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 233 / Monday, December 4, 2000 / Notices 75771 2 departures. No more than one slot DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION In notice document 00±29918 exemption time may be selected in any appearing in the issue of Wednesday, hour. In this round each carrier may Federal Aviation Administration November 22, 2000, under select one slot exemption time in each SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, in the first RTCA Future Flight Data Collection hour without regard to whether a slot is column, in the fifteenth line, the date Committee available in that hour. the FAA will approve or disapprove the application, in whole or part, no later d. In the second and third rounds, Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the than should read ``March 15, 2001''. only carriers providing service to small Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. hub and nonhub airports may L. 92±463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: participate. Each carrier may select up is hereby given for the Future Flight Patrick Vaught, Program Manager, FAA/ to 2 slot exemption times, one arrival Data Collection Committee meeting to Airports District Office, 100 West Cross and one departure in each round. No be held January 11, 2000, starting at 9 Street, Suite B, Jackson, MS 39208± carrier may select more than 4 a.m. This meeting will be held at RTCA, 2307, 601±664±9885. exemption slot times in rounds 2 and 3. 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite Issued in Jackson, Mississippi on 1020, Washington, DC, 20036. November 24, 2000. e. Beginning with the fourth round, The agenda will include: (1) Welcome all eligible carriers may participate.
    [Show full text]
  • Critique of “Great Rail Disaster”
    www.vtpi.org [email protected] 250-508-5150 Rail Transit In America A Comprehensive Evaluation of Benefits 1 September 2021 By Todd Litman Victoria Transport Policy Institute Produced with support from the American Public Transportation Association Photo: Darrell Clarke Abstract This study evaluates rail transit benefits based on a comprehensive analysis of transportation system performance in major U.S. cities. It finds that cities with large, well- established rail systems have significantly higher per capita transit ridership, lower average per capita vehicle ownership and annual mileage, less traffic congestion, lower traffic death rates, lower consumer expenditures on transportation, and higher transit service cost recovery than otherwise comparable cities with less or no rail transit service. This indicates that rail transit systems provide economic, social and environmental benefits, and these benefits tend to increase as a system expands and matures. This report discusses best practices for evaluating transit benefits. It examines criticisms of rail transit investments, finding that many are based on inaccurate analysis. A condensed version of this report was published as, "Impacts of Rail Transit on the Performance of a Transportation System," Transportation Research Record 1930, Transportation Research Board (www.trb.org), 2005, pp. 23-29. Todd Litman 2004-2012 You are welcome and encouraged to copy, distribute, share and excerpt this document and its ideas, provided the author is given attribution. Please send your corrections,
    [Show full text]
  • THE CASE for REPARATIONS in TULSA, OKLAHOMA a Human Rights Argument May 2020
    HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH THE CASE FOR REPARATIONS IN TULSA, OKLAHOMA A Human Rights Argument May 2020 The Case for Reparations in Tulsa, Oklahoma A Human Rights Argument Summary ............................................................................................................................... 1 Methodology ........................................................................................................................ 4 The Greenwood Massacre and its Legacy ............................................................................. 5 The Massacre ........................................................................................................................ 5 The Massacre’s Aftermath ...................................................................................................... 6 Obstacles to Rebuilding ....................................................................................................... 10 Greenwood Rebuilds, Subsequent Decline ............................................................................ 13 Redlining ....................................................................................................................... 14 “Urban Renewal” ........................................................................................................... 16 Tulsa Today ........................................................................................................................ 20 Poverty, Race, and Geography .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]