ERMA New Zealand Evaluation & Review Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ERMA New Zealand Evaluation & Review Report ERMA New Zealand Evaluation & Review Report Application for approval to import for release a moth, the boneseed leafroller (Tortrix s.l. sp. “chrysanthemoides”), that is not currently present in New Zealand for the purpose of biological control of the weed pest boneseed Chrysanthemoides monilifera subsp. monilifera (L.) Norlindh (Family: Asteraceae) Application code: NOR03001 Prepared for the Environmental Risk Management Authority Key Issues The project team notes that no New Zealand natives belong to the same tribe as Chrysanthemoides monilifera subsp. monilifera. The project team considers that the applicant has followed internationally accepted host-specificity testing protocols. External experts and submitters questioned the choice of New Zealand natives used in the host-specificity and the project team notes that the selection criteria were not well explained. The source of plant material was not consistent between the Australian and New Zealand tests which may impact on the interpretation of results. The use of results from experiments done in environments unlike those experienced in New Zealand may impact on applicability of conclusions to the current application. Boneseed has been declared an unwanted organism by the Department of Conservation and the project team notes that in the application DoC was identified as a potential participant in the release programme. It is noted however, that DoC have made a submission opposing the approval of the application. The project team considers that there would be value in discussing these matters further at the hearing. Page 2 of 84 Table of Contents ERMA New Zealand Evaluation & Review Report 1 1 Introduction 5 1.1 Application Summary 5 1.2 Project team 7 2 Application Process Review 7 2.1 Timeline 7 2.2 Agencies notified 7 3 Information provided 8 3.1 Application 8 3.2 Submissions 8 3.3 External expertise 9 3.4 Additional information 9 4 The decision-making process 9 4.1 General 9 4.2 Analysis and terminology 11 5 Identification of the Organism (including scope) 13 6 Organism Characteristics 14 7 Efficacy of the biological agent 15 8 International Obligations 20 9 Identification and assessment of potentially significant adverse and beneficial effects (risks, costs and benefits) 21 9.2 The environment 21 9.3 Human health 35 9.4 Māori culture 36 9.5 Society and community 44 9.6 The market economy 46 10 Overall Evaluation 47 10.1 Summary of information 47 10.2 Summary of adverse and beneficial effects 48 10.3 Evaluation against statutory criteria 49 10.4 Previous consideration of similar applications 52 11 References 53 Appendix 1: Summary of submissions received 58 Appendix 2: Dr Barbara Barratt’s Report 63 Appendix 3: Dr Ilse Breitwieser’s Report 69 Appendix 4: Decision Pathway 76 Appendix 5: Qualitative scales for risk assessment 79 Page 3 of 84 Appendix 6: Submissions received by ERMA New Zealand 84 Page 4 of 84 1 Introduction 1.1 Application Summary Purpose of Application 1.1.1 Environment Canterbury seek approval to import for release Tortrix Linnaeus, 1758 s.l. sp. "chrysanthemoides" under section 34(1)(a) of the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1996 (HSNO). Biological control programme 1.1.2 The project team notes that the boneseed genus Chrysanthemoides is one of six genera in the tribe Calenduleae (Family: Asteraceae) that are native to South Africa (Weiss, 1986). The genus Chrysanthemoides comprises only two species, C. monilifera and C. incana. However, six subspecies of C. monilifera have been described. Chrysanthemoides monilifera has been introduced into a number of countries including Australia, Italy, St Helena, and France (Weiss, 1986; Scott, 1996). Only one subspecies C. monilifera subsp. monilifera is in New Zealand (Winks & Fowler, 2000). 1.1.3 The applicant states that in New Zealand C. monilifera subsp. monilifera (boneseed) has the potential to cause substantial environmental damage (Syrett 1999). It invades plant communities on coastal cliffs and dune- lands, and inland grassland and shrub areas. Dense thickets of boneseed can form which displace native vegetation and shade out native seedlings. The long-term impact of boneseed on native biodiversity may be much more serious than that of a weed such as gorse because there is little native seedling recruitment under a pure stand of boneseed (McAlpine & Timmins 2002). 1.1.4 In 2001 the Department of Conservation (DoC) declared boneseed an unwanted organism under section 164(c) of the Biosecurity Act, 1993. This was on the basis that it was capable of forming self sustaining populations in New Zealand, taking into account the ease of eradication; and displacing or reducing any native species or any introduced species for which the Department of Conservation is responsible; or causing the alteration or deterioration of natural habitats; or causing adverse effects to New Zealand’s indigenous biological diversity. 1.1.5 Boneseed is located mainly in coastal habitats throughout the North Island, and in Nelson/Marlborough, around Banks Peninsula, and Anderson's Bay in Dunedin and an indicative map of boneseed distribution is on page 6 of the application. Several regional councils and DoC implement active control programmes for boneseed in their area. 1.1.6 The boneseed shrub is a South African native, generally 2-3 m high, with thick, leathery leaves and masses of bright yellow daisy-like flowers, followed by clusters of black fruit that contain a single bone coloured Page 5 of 84 seed. This hardy weed can grow in a range of environments and is a prolific seed producer (Weiss, 1986). 1.1.7 One submitter (6330) requested some specific information about the weed including lifespan of individuals and stands, does succession occur, plant form in South Africa, and site of colonisation (eg disturbed soil), followed by succession or stability, seed production (numbers and viability and spread). The project team considers that this issue is adequately addressed in sections 7.1.14-7.1.15 and section 2.2 of the application. 1.1.8 One submitter (6330) specifically questioned what information was available to prove that boneseed was spreading and indicated the potential magnitude of the problem and to what extent was displacement of other species occurring. The project team considers that this issue is addressed in section 1.1.5 and comments by submitters 6321, 6322, 6325, 6326 and 6332. 1.1.9 Biological control using boneseed leafroller (the biological characteristics of which are described in Section 6 of this report) in a number of areas is considered the only option for managing this weed pest. This is because herbicide use is often impractical due to damage to native plants and/or inaccessible terrain. In certain areas, control may be possible by stock grazing on small plants but in other areas of steep terrain this is considered neither feasible nor desirable. 1.1.10 The applicant proposes to establish a rearing colony of the boneseed leafroller in South Africa, based on specimens collected from the same area as those used for host range testing. Larvae (5th and 6th instar) will be imported into New Zealand and held in quarantine until clearance is granted by the MAF (as discussed in section 9.2.33. Mass rearing will then be done at Landcare Research, Lincoln, followed by release at sites to be determined collaboratively by Landcare Research, regional councils, the Department of Conservation, iwi throughout New Zealand, and colleagues in South Africa and Australia. The project team notes that the submission by DoC did not support this application so is unclear about their potential involvement in any release programme. Potential release sites are indicated in a map on page 6 of the application in relation to the distribution of boneseed. The project team notes that the printed version of the map does not show the potential release sites clearly but implies that initial releases are likely to exclude coastal Bay of Plenty, Southern Wellington, Marlborough and Otago. It is also noted that the applicant has proposed to do post-release monitoring to assess the establishment and impact of the release biocontrol agent as detailed in section 4.2 of the application. Page 6 of 84 1.2 Project team 1.2.1 The project team consists of the following ERMA New Zealand staff members: Dr Sonia Whiteman Project Leader Dr Abdul Moeed Senior Scientific Advisor Dr Fleur François Scientific Advisor Linda Robinson Manager Māori Zack Bishara Māori Advisor Janet Gough Senior Analyst 1.2.2 This report was reviewed by Shaun Slattery (Programme Manager), Dr Geoff Ridley (Science Manager) and Dr Bas Walker (Chief Executive) and reviewed and signed-out by Dr Libby Harrison (Manager, New Organisms) on the 24th of November 2004. 2 Application Process Review 2.1 Timeline 2.1.1 The application was formally received on 19 August 2004 and publicly notified on 2 September 2004. Public submissions closed on 14th October 2004. Additional information was sought under section 58(1) of the HSNO Act as described in section 3.3.1. As a result the hearing was postponed by 11 working days under section 58(3) of the HSNO Act. This Evaluation & Review (E&R) report was circulated 13 days prior to the date of the hearing, which was held on the 13th of December 2004. 2.2 Agencies notified 2.2.1 Various government departments and agencies were notified of the receipt of the application (in accordance with section 53(4) of the HSNO Act), and provided with an opportunity to comment or make a public submissions on the application. 2.2.2 Of the government departments and agencies notified, only two made submissions the Department of Conservation (DoC) and the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. Page 7 of 84 3 Information provided 3.1 Application 3.1.1 The following documents were supplied by the applicant at the time the application was received: Application NOR03001 to Import for Release or Release from Containment any new organism including a genetically modified organism but excluding conditional release and rapid assessment [Form NOR] Copies of cited literature, as listed in the application.
Recommended publications
  • Volume 73, Number
    New Zealand Science Review Vol 73 (3–4) 2016 Symposium on Systematics and Biodiversity in honour of Dr Dennis P. Gordon Official Journal of the New Zealand Association of Scientists ISSN 0028-8667 New Zealand Science Review Vol 73 (3–4) 2016 Official Journal of the New Zealand Association of Scientists P O Box 1874, Wellington www.scientists.org.nz A forum for the exchange of views on science and science policy Managing Editor: Allen Petrey Contents Guest Editor: Daniel Leduc Production Editor: Geoff Gregory Editorial .....................................................................................................................................................61 Proceedings of a Symposium on Systematics and Biodiversity: Past, Present and Future, National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research, Wellington, April 2016 Bryozoa—not a minor phylum – Dennis P. Gordon and Mark J. Costello ..................................................63 The contribution of Dennis P. Gordon to the understanding of New Zealand Bryozoa – Abigail M Smith, Philip Bock and Peter Batson ................................................................................67 The study of taxonomy and systematics enhances ecological and conservation science – Ashley A. Rowden ............................................................................................................................72 Taxonomic research, collections and associated databases – and the changing science scene in New Zealand – Wendy Nelson .............................................................................79
    [Show full text]
  • Chrysanthemoides Monilifera Ssp
    MANAGEMENT OF BONESEED (CHRYSANTHEMOIDES MONILIFERA SSP. MONILIFERA) (L.) T. NORL. USING FIRE, HERBICIDES AND OTHER TECHNIQUES IN AUSTRALIAN WOODLANDS Rachel L. Melland Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Agriculture, Food and Wine University of Adelaide August 2007 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ....................................................................................................... II ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................ VI DECLARATION ................................................................................................................ VIII ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................. IX CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 1 1.1 AIMS OF THIS THESIS .......................................................................................................... 3 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................... 5 2.1 PROCESSES OF NATIVE ECOSYSTEM DEGRADATION ............................................................ 5 2.2 GLOBAL PLANT INVASIONS – ECOSYSTEM DEGRADING PROCESSES .................................... 6 2.3 THE ENVIRONMENTAL WEED PROBLEM IN AUSTRALIA ..................................................... 10 2.4 CAUSES AND PROCESSES OF INVASIVENESS .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Biological Control Agents in an IWM Program for Chrysanthemoides Monilifera Subsp
    The role of biological control agents in an IWM program for Chrysanthemoides monilifera subsp. rotundata (bitou bush) Royce H. Holtkamp1 Summary Bitou bush, Chrysanthemoides monilifera subspecies rotundata, is a native of South Africa, which was used extensively in Australia as a sand-stabilising plant and for revegetation of coastal areas mined for mineral sands. It has now become a serious environmental weed in eastern Australia, primarily of conservation areas, where it significantly reduces biodiversity. Since 1989, six species of insects have been released on bitou bush, four of which have established. These are having varied impacts on bitou bush with bitou tip moth, Comostolopsis germana, and bitou seed fly, Mesoclanis polana, being the most successful. An integrated weed management approach appears to be the best option for long-term sustainable control of bitou bush. This paper discusses the use of biological control agents in combina- tion with other control options such as strategic herbicide applications, fire, physical removal and revegetation techniques. Keywords: biological control, bitou bush, Chrysanthemoides monilifera subspecies rotundata, integrated weed management. The plant withdrawn. However, this action came far too late and by 1976 C. monilifera subsp. rotundata was naturalised Chrysanthemoides monilifera subspecies rotundata along much of the NSW coast. (DC.) T. Norl. (bitou bush), is a competitive environ- A survey conducted in 2001 by the NSW National mental weed of South African origin. It is primarily Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) has shown C. restricted to areas of summer rainfall (Parsons and monilifera subsp. rotundata to be present on 900 km Cuthbertson 1992) and infests coastal areas of southern (80%) of the NSW coastline and the dominant plant on Queensland, New South Wales (NSW) and Lord Howe over 400 km.
    [Show full text]
  • Nzbotsoc No 11 March 1988
    NEW ZEALAND BOTANICAL SOCIETY NEWSLETTER NUMBER 11 MARCH 1988 The 1988 subscription for four issues of the Newsletter (March, June, Sep• tember, December) is $10.00. A reduced subscription of $5.00 is available to full-time students. A bright green invoice for 1988 subs was enclosed in the last issue (December 1987) sent to existing subscribers. Half the invoices are still outstanding! If there is a bright green reminder notice inside this issue please pay promptly. Back issues of the Newsletter are available at $2.50 each - Number 1 (August 1985 to Number 10 (December 1987). New subscriptions are always welcome, and should be sent to the Editor (address below). The balance sheet for the year 1 January - 31 December 1987 presented here follows on from the previous statement of financial position which appeared in Newsletter Number 7 (March 1987). INCOME EXPENDITURE B/Fwd 01 i 1987 674.37 Printing No. 7 492.80 Subs 2560.00 Postage No. 7 85.40 Student subs 40.00 Printing No. 8 520.30 Donations + Back Issue Sales 407.09 Postage No. 8 82.80 Interest 69.91 Printing No. 9 633.47 Interest 13.20 Postage No. 9 55.20 Interest 24.58 Printing No. 10 916.30 Interest 136.57 Postage no. 10 83.10 NZJBot subs 861.30 NZJBot subs 861.30 $4787 .02 $3730.67 Excess Income over Expenditure Carried forward to 1988: $1056.35 Invitation to contribute Contributions from all sources are most welcome. A list of possible column headings can be found on p.2 of Number 1 of the Newsletter.
    [Show full text]
  • Modelling Bitou Bush (Chrysanthemoides Monilifera Ssp. Rotundata) and a Seed fly (Mesoclanis Polana)
    Exploring interactions between cultural and biological control techniques: modelling bitou bush (Chrysanthemoides monilifera ssp. rotundata) and a seed fly (Mesoclanis polana) Darren J. Kriticos,1,3 Rachel M. Stuart1,2 and Julian E. Ash2 Summary Weed seed-production and seedbank dynamics have been a focus of attention for many biological control campaigns. This interest has perhaps been promoted by the recognition of the important role of weed seed dynamics in annual cropping systems, and frequent observations that seed production is markedly increased in ranges into which a plant is introduced, compared with rates in its native range. Seeds are the means by which most higher-order perennial plants disperse, and reestablish following disturbance. The role and importance of seeds in the population dynamics of weed popula- tions depends upon factors such as successional state of the invaded vegetation association, the distur- bance frequency, plant age at maturity, seed decay rate, and self-thinning patterns. The role of seeds and their predators in maintaining a plant population may be minimal, and decreasing the rate of seed production and the size of the seedbank may have only minor impacts on the population dynamics of perennial weeds. The interactions between cultural management techniques for bitou bush and its seed fly were explored using a process-based population dynamics model. The role of the seed fly in reducing the invasive potential of bitou bush and modifying the population reestablishment rates following distur- bance were studied. The seed fly has substantially reduced seed production, but the effect of the fly on canopy cover of bitou bush and on its invasion potential appears negligible.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns of Flammability Across the Vascular Plant Phylogeny, with Special Emphasis on the Genus Dracophyllum
    Lincoln University Digital Thesis Copyright Statement The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). This thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use: you will use the copy only for the purposes of research or private study you will recognise the author's right to be identified as the author of the thesis and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate you will obtain the author's permission before publishing any material from the thesis. Patterns of flammability across the vascular plant phylogeny, with special emphasis on the genus Dracophyllum A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of philosophy at Lincoln University by Xinglei Cui Lincoln University 2020 Abstract of a thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of philosophy. Abstract Patterns of flammability across the vascular plant phylogeny, with special emphasis on the genus Dracophyllum by Xinglei Cui Fire has been part of the environment for the entire history of terrestrial plants and is a common disturbance agent in many ecosystems across the world. Fire has a significant role in influencing the structure, pattern and function of many ecosystems. Plant flammability, which is the ability of a plant to burn and sustain a flame, is an important driver of fire in terrestrial ecosystems and thus has a fundamental role in ecosystem dynamics and species evolution. However, the factors that have influenced the evolution of flammability remain unclear.
    [Show full text]
  • Rock Garden Quarterly
    ROCK GARDEN QUARTERLY VOLUME 53 NUMBER 1 WINTER 1995 COVER: Aquilegia scopulorum with vespid wasp by Cindy Nelson-Nold of Lakewood, Colorado All Material Copyright © 1995 North American Rock Garden Society ROCK GARDEN QUARTERLY BULLETIN OF THE NORTH AMERICAN ROCK GARDEN SOCIETY formerly Bulletin of the American Rock Garden Society VOLUME 53 NUMBER 1 WINTER 1995 FEATURES Alpine Gesneriads of Europe, by Darrell Trout 3 Cassiopes and Phyllodoces, by Arthur Dome 17 Plants of Mt. Hutt, a New Zealand Preview, by Ethel Doyle 29 South Africa: Part II, by Panayoti Kelaidis 33 South African Sampler: A Dozen Gems for the Rock Garden, by Panayoti Kelaidis 54 The Vole Story, by Helen Sykes 59 DEPARTMENTS Plant Portrait 62 Books 65 Ramonda nathaliae 2 ROCK GARDEN QUARTERLY VOL. 53:1 ALPINE GESNERIADS OF EUROPE by Darrell Trout J. he Gesneriaceae, or gesneriad Institution and others brings the total family, is a diverse family of mostly Gesneriaceae of China to a count of 56 tropical and subtropical plants with genera and about 413 species. These distribution throughout the world, should provide new horticultural including the north and south temper• material for the rock garden and ate and tropical zones. The 125 genera, alpine house. Yet the choicest plants 2850-plus species include terrestrial for the rock garden or alpine house and epiphytic herbs, shrubs, vines remain the European genera Ramonda, and, rarely, small trees. Botanically, Jancaea, and Haberlea. and in appearance, it is not always easy to separate the family History Gesneriaceae from the closely related The family was named for Konrad Scrophulariaceae (Verbascum, Digitalis, von Gesner, a sixteenth century natu• Calceolaria), the Orobanchaceae, and ralist.
    [Show full text]
  • 01 Innerfrontcover40 2.Indd 1 8/27/2010 2:27:58 PM BOTHALIA
    ISSN 0006 8241 = Bothalia Bothalia A JOURNAL OF BOTANICAL RESEARCH Vol. 40,2 Oct. 2010 TECHNICAL PUBLICATIONS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL BIODIVERSITY INSTITUTE PRETORIA Obtainable from the South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI), Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001, Republic of South Africa. A catalogue of all available publications will be issued on request. BOTHALIA Bothalia is named in honour of General Louis Botha, first Premier and Minister of Agriculture of the Union of South Africa. This house journal of the South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, is devoted to the furtherance of botanical science. The main fields covered are taxonomy, ecology, anatomy and cytology. Two parts of the journal and an index to contents, authors and subjects are published annually. Three booklets of the contents (a) to Vols 1–20, (b) to Vols 21–25, (c) to Vols 26–30, and (d) to Vols 31–37 (2001– 2007) are available. STRELITZIA A series of occasional publications on southern African flora and vegetation, replacing Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa and Annals of Kirstenbosch Botanic Gardens. MEMOIRS OF THE BOTANICAL SURVEY OF SOUTH AFRICA The memoirs are individual treatises usually of an ecological nature, but sometimes dealing with taxonomy or economic botany. Published: Nos 1–63 (many out of print). Discontinued after No. 63. ANNALS OF KIRSTENBOSCH BOTANIC GARDENS A series devoted to the publication of monographs and major works on southern African flora.Published: Vols 14–19 (earlier volumes published as supplementary volumes to the Journal of South African Botany). Discontinued after Vol. 19. FLOWERING PLANTS OF AFRICA (FPA) This serial presents colour plates of African plants with accompanying text.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACTS 117 Systematics Section, BSA / ASPT / IOPB
    Systematics Section, BSA / ASPT / IOPB 466 HARDY, CHRISTOPHER R.1,2*, JERROLD I DAVIS1, breeding system. This effectively reproductively isolates the species. ROBERT B. FADEN3, AND DENNIS W. STEVENSON1,2 Previous studies have provided extensive genetic, phylogenetic and 1Bailey Hortorium, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853; 2New York natural selection data which allow for a rare opportunity to now Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY 10458; 3Dept. of Botany, National study and interpret ontogenetic changes as sources of evolutionary Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, novelties in floral form. Three populations of M. cardinalis and four DC 20560 populations of M. lewisii (representing both described races) were studied from initiation of floral apex to anthesis using SEM and light Phylogenetics of Cochliostema, Geogenanthus, and microscopy. Allometric analyses were conducted on data derived an undescribed genus (Commelinaceae) using from floral organs. Sympatric populations of the species from morphology and DNA sequence data from 26S, 5S- Yosemite National Park were compared. Calyces of M. lewisii initi- NTS, rbcL, and trnL-F loci ate later than those of M. cardinalis relative to the inner whorls, and sepals are taller and more acute. Relative times of initiation of phylogenetic study was conducted on a group of three small petals, sepals and pistil are similar in both species. Petal shapes dif- genera of neotropical Commelinaceae that exhibit a variety fer between species throughout development. Corolla aperture of unusual floral morphologies and habits. Morphological A shape becomes dorso-ventrally narrow during development of M. characters and DNA sequence data from plastid (rbcL, trnL-F) and lewisii, and laterally narrow in M.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Plantfamilie ASTERACEAE: 6
    ISSN 0254-3486 = SA Tydskrif vir Natuurwetenskap en Tegnologie 23, no. 1 & 2 2004 35 Algemene artikel Die plantfamilie ASTERACEAE: 6. Die subfamilie Asteroideae P.P.J. Herman Nasionale Botaniese Instituut, Privaat sak X101, Pretoria, 0001 e-pos: [email protected] UITTREKSEL Die tribusse van die subfamilie Asteroideae word meer volledig in hierdie artikel beskryf. Die genusse wat aan dié tribusse behoort word gelys en hulle verspreiding aangedui. ABSTRACT The plant family Asteraceae: 6. The subfamily Asteroideae. The tribes of the subfamily Asteroideae are described in this article. Genera belonging to the different tribes are listed and their distribution given. INLEIDING Tribus ANTHEMIDEAE Cass. Hierdie artikel is die laaste in die reeks oor die plantfamilie Verteenwoordigers van hierdie tribus is gewoonlik aromaties, Asteraceae.1-5 In die vorige artikel is die klassifikasie bokant byvoorbeeld Artemisia afra (wilde-als), Eriocephalus-soorte, familievlak asook die indeling van die familie Asteraceae in sub- Pentzia-soorte.4 Die feit dat hulle aromaties is, beteken dat hulle families en tribusse bespreek.5 Hierdie artikel handel oor die baie chemiese stowwe bevat. Hierdie stowwe word dikwels subfamilie Asteroideae van die familie Asteraceae, met ’n aangewend vir medisyne (Artemisia) of insekgif (Tanacetum).4 bespreking van die tribusse en die genusse wat aan die verskillende Verder is hulle blaartjies gewoonlik fyn verdeeld en selfs by dié tribusse behoort. Die ‘edelweiss’ wat in die musiekblyspel The met onverdeelde blaartjies, is die blaartjies klein en naaldvormig sound of music besing word, behoort aan die tribus Gnaphalieae (Erica-agtig). Die pappus bestaan gewoonlik uit vry of vergroeide van die subfamilie Asteroideae.
    [Show full text]
  • Fruit Evolution and Diversification in Campanulid Angiosperms
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1111/evo.12180 FRUIT EVOLUTION AND DIVERSIFICATION IN CAMPANULID ANGIOSPERMS Jeremy M. Beaulieu1,2 and Michael J. Donoghue1 1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, P.O. Box 208106, New Haven, Connecticut 10620 2E-mail: [email protected] Received January 28, 2013 Accepted May 30, 2013 Data Archived: Dryad doi: 10.5061/dryad.vb850 With increases in both the size and scope of phylogenetic trees, we are afforded a renewed opportunity to address long-standing comparative questions, such as whether particular fruit characters account for much of the variation in diversity among flowering plant clades. Studies to date have reported conflicting results, largely as a consequence of taxonomic scale and a reliance on potentially conservative statistical measures. Here we examine a larger and older angiosperm clade, the Campanulidae, and infer the rates of character transitions among the major fruit types, emphasizing the evolution of the achene fruits that are most frequently observed within the group. Our analyses imply that campanulids likely originated bearing capsules, and that all subsequent fruit diversity was derived from various modifications of this dry fruit type. We also found that the preponderance of lineages bearing achenes is a consequence of not only being a fruit type that is somewhat irreversible once it evolves, but one that also seems to have a positive association with diversification rates. Although these results imply the achene fruit type is a significant correlate of diversity patterns observed across campanulids, we conclude that it remains difficult to confidently and directly view this character state as the actual cause of increased diversification rates.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Notes on the Linaceae
    SOME NOTES ON THE LINACEAE. THE CROSS POLLINATION OF FLAX. BY J. VARGAS EYRE ASD G. SMITH, B.Sc. (F~'om the Research ])epartmet~t, Sottth-Easteru Agricultural College, Wye.) WHILST test~ag a large number of species of Linaceae for cyanophoric glucosides during ~he past three yeaxz, it was observed that those species carrying white, blue or red flowers were more or less richly cyanophoric whereas the yellow flowered species, which for the most part exhibit an entirely different habit, fidled to yield hydrogen cyanide and seemed to be devoid of cyanogenetic enzyme. During 1913 obser- vations were made on a larger number of both blue and yellow flowered species and the previous observations have been confirmed. (Studies on Enzyme Action, xviii, Royal Soc. Proc., B, vol. LXXXV, 1912.) That the absence of cyanophoric glucoside and its enzyme is in any way correlated with the presence of the yellow pighaent cannot be stated, but the fact that both glucoside and enzyme are absent fl'om yellow flowered varieties led to the attempt being made to produce a yellow flowered flax containing glucoside or enzyme, or bothl, so as to throw light upon the question of the inheritance of Chemical Charac- teristics, and fi'om this point of view the work has been extended. The present circumstances, however, are likely to cause a break in this work, and it is therefore considered desilable at this stage to place on record the observations which have been made. 1 The most complete information relating to hybrid flaxes appears to be contained ill Graebner's Synopsis der Mitteleuropiiischen Flora but, with the exception of the uucel'.
    [Show full text]