DOCSLIB.ORG

Parish Councils Submissions to the North Somerset Council Electoral Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Parish Councils Submissions to the North Somerset Council Electoral Review Parish Councils submissions to the North Somerset Council electoral review This PDF document contains 23 submissions from Parish Councils. Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. Click on the submission you would like to view. If you are not taken to that page, please scroll through the document. Cooper, Mark From: Bowden, Tim Sent: 12 March 2014 14:23 To: Cooper, Mark Subject: FW: Proposed boundary changes Tim Bowden Review Manager Local Government Boundary Commission for England Layden House 76-86 Turnmill Street London EC1M 5LG Tel: 020 7664 8514 www.lgbce.org.uk It would help us if you would take a few minutes to answer a few questions about your experience of how we dealt with you. How are we doing? - Click on this link to give us your views From: Backwell Parish Clerk [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 12 March 2014 14:04 To: Reviews@ Subject: Proposed boundary changes Dear Sirs Backwell Parish Council met last Thursday 6th March and discussed the proposed boundary changes. The Council strongly rejected Map B on the basis no community of interest between Backwell and other parts of the proposed ward, and also as the largest community in that proposed ward considered the title of Gordano & Wraxall inappropriate. The Council would prefer to revert to a ward based on Map A with the recommendation that Backwell and Winford combined into a single 2 member ward. Yours faithfully Jane Stone Clerk to Backwell Parish Council 1 Cooper, Mark From: Fuller, Heather Sent: 25 March 2014 13:36 To: Cooper, Mark Subject: FW: Electoral Review of North Somerset: Further Limited Consultation Attachments: BGPC 25-03-14 LGBCE ward boundary comment.pdf From: Barrow Gurney Clerk [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 25 March 2014 13:34 To: Reviews@ Cc: Andy Robbins; Eric and Anne GATES; Geoff Coombs; Lesley Waldron; Rob Mckenzie Subject: Electoral Review of North Somerset: Further Limited Consultation For the attention of the Review Officer (North Somerset) Please find attached, the comments of the Barrow Gurney Parish Council in response to the draft ward boundary recommendations for North Somerset. Thank you for the opportunity to submit representation on this matter and should further information or clarity be required, please do not hesitate to contact me. Yours Sincerely, Joanna van Tonder Clerk to the Barrow Gurney Parish Council 163 BARROW GURNEY PARISH COUNCIL Clerk: Ms Joanna van Tonder Review Officer (North Somerset) Local Government Boundary Commission for England Layden House 76 – 86 Turnmill Street London EC1M 5LG 25 March 2014 Dear Sir / Madam, RE: Electoral Review of North Somerset: Barrow Gurney Parish Council comments on the further limited consultation I refer to the draft recommendations for the ward boundaries of North Somerset and further limited consultation that commenced on 12 February of this year. Barrow Gurney Parish Council is extremely disappointed to see the Boundary Commission's Map B, which appears to overturn the original recommendation (Map A) with which the Council were broadly content. Map B ignores the Council's previous comments and proposes an unacceptable solution in which the scale and population of Long Ashton heavily outweigh the surrounding rural areas. As observed in relation to the original proposals, the Parish Council believes that Barrow Gurney is a rural community, with much in common with the village's rural neighbours. Service links tend to focus on Backwell, which provides rail communication, a secondary school and a leisure centre. The particular development issues that concern the village relate to the growth of Bristol Airport and its associated infrastructure, where Barrow Gurney and parishes surrounding the airport (predominantly Dundry, Winford and Backwell) have common interests. The Parish Council believes that the solution offered by Map A for this immediate area was far preferable to the revised proposal set out in Map B, but a two member constituency which brought together Backwell and Winford would also offer an acceptable solution. Yours Sincerely, Joanna van Tonder Clerk of the Barrow Gurney Parish Council Cooper, Mark From: Fuller, Heather Sent: 25 March 2014 13:24 To: Cooper, Mark Subject: FW: North Somerset Attachments: LGBC recommendations - response ideas.doc From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of parish clerk Sent: 25 March 2014 12:20 To: Reviews@ Subject: North Somerset I attach a response to the consultation on behalf of Blagdon Parish Council. Regards Peter -- Peter Ballantyne Clerk Blagdon Parish Council E: [email protected] W: www.blagdonpc.org.uk If you have problems with waste collections, pot holes or dog fouling you can contact North Somerset Council's Streets and Open Spaces by visiting www.n-somerset.gov.uk/connect to report it online, or ring 01934 888 802. 167 Parish Clerk – Peter Ballantyne 66 Cox Way, Clevedon, North Somerset, BS21 5AD Tel: 01275 349098 Email: [email protected] Review Officer (North Somerset) LGBCE Layden House 76–86 Turnmill Street London EC1M 5LG 25th March 2014 Dear Review Officer, Blagdon Parish Council has reviewed and discussed the “further Limited consultation” documentation produced by the LGBC and strongly opposes the recommendation for a new 3-member Churchill and Wrington Ward. The original draft recommendation to retain the current single member Blagdon and Churchill ward was widely supported, including by all the main political groupings within North Somerset. Given this support, Blagdon Parish Council did not feel it necessary to make any formal submission. We were therefore very surprised to find that major changes were now being proposed to those draft recommendations. In putting forward these changes, the LGBC states that they are being made “in the light of representations received during the consultation”. We have reviewed the representations made in the supporting documentation provided and can find no evidence to justify this position. In fact, the overall reactions to the revised recommendations suggest widespread concern and even greater numbers of objections to these. One of the key justifications for the exercise was to address supposed “electoral inequalities”. From studying the electorate numbers supplied, we consider any changes resulting from the new ward structure to be of minimal impact. To go from a current variance to the North Somerset average of -8% to one of -5% under the proposed regime is hardly significant and cannot justify the major changes and costs involved in establishing and administering this new structure. Blagdon and Churchill parishes have shared interests and facilities. Blagdon Parish Council does not feel that we have any social, educational, commercial or geographic links or affinities with the majority of the Councils that will comprise the proposed “super ward”. If anything, we feel that we will have much less of a voice if subsumed into a large Churchill and Wrington ward, and reduced representation at District and North Somerset levels. At a time when we are being encouraged to become more resilient and a policy of increased localism is actively promoted, we feel that the proposed ward change is the wrong solution. Blagdon Parish Council therefore wishes to lodge its objection to the revised recommendation. It is badly thought through, lacks support and further marginalises the rural parishes in general, and Blagdon in particular. Yours sincerely, Peter Ballantyne Clerk Cooper, Mark From: Fuller, Heather Sent: 24 March 2014 11:40 To: Cooper, Mark Subject: FW: Proposed Churchill & Wrington Ward From: Brockley Parish Council [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 21 March 2014 14:53 To: Reviews@ Subject: Proposed Churchill & Wrington Ward Sirs Brockley Parish Council met on 12 March and discussed the proposed 3‐member Churchill & Wrington Ward (Map B). It was felt Brockley had quite a lot in common with Wrington and Cleeve (Map A) but that making a very large ward would reduce the effectiveness of the district councillor. WE THEREFORE OBJECT TO TO MAP B. We did not object to Map A last September. Yours faithfully Gillian Rowley Clerk 168 Cooper, Mark From: Egan, Helen Sent: 01 April 2014 09:08 To: Cooper, Mark Subject: FW: Electoral Review of North Somerset : Further Limited Consultation Attachments: Boundary_Comm._LGBCE_23.03.doc Hi Mark, Please see the below submission for North Somerset. Regards, Helen From: Teresa Martin [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 31 March 2014 08:27 To: Reviews@ Cc: Paul Keel; Roger Daniels Subject: Electoral Review of North Somerset : Further Limited Consultation Please find attached comments from Burrington Parish Council on the above. A signed copy will be sent in the post today. Kind regards TeresaMartin Clerk to Burrington Parish Council 124 BURRINGTON PARISH COUNCIL CLERK TO BURRINGTON PARISH COUNCIL Email: [email protected] Review Officer (North Somerset) Local Government Boundary Commission for England Layden House 76-86 Turnmill Street London EC1M 5LG by email to [email protected] 23 March 2014 Dear Sir/Madam, ELECTORAL REVIEW OF NORTH SOMERSET: FURTHER LIMITED CONSULTATION I write to conv ey th e comments o f Burri ngton Paris h Council on the Commission’s furth er pro posals for the C hurchill & Wrington Ward under which Bu rrington w ould be o ne o f 9 p arishes in a 3-member war d with a population of 9,722. We u nderstand the d ifficulties o f a chieving b roadly cons istent ratios of electors to district councillors in a mix ed ur ban and r ural area like North Somerset – whi lst r educing th e num ber of d istrict councillors. Ho wever, effective local democracy also depends on having electoral divisions that are small enough to all ow eff ective r elationships to dev elop between d istrict councillors, their electorates and the constituent parishes.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Local Listed Building Consent Order Secondary Glazing Tyntesfield
    Local Listed Building Consent Order 01 For secondary glazing at the Tyntesfield estate. 1 Table of Contents 1. Introduction. .................................................................................................................................. 3 1.1 Related Policy ........................................................................................................................ 3 2. The listed buildings cover by the order ..................................................................................... 3 3. Description of the consented works .......................................................................................... 4 4. Statement of reasons of the consented works ........................................................................ 4 5. Purpose of the order .................................................................................................................... 4 6. Term of order ................................................................................................................................ 4 7. Other Particulars .......................................................................................................................... 5 Order reviewed and approved by: ..................................................................................................... 5 8. Appendix One: plans for acceptable secondary glazing ........................................................ 6 9. Appendix Two: secondary glazing manufacturer details. .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bristol Airport Limited (Majority Owned by Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan, Canada)
    Applicant: Bristol Airport Limited (majority owned by Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan, Canada) Application 20/P/2896/APPCON- addendum to Environmental Statement and associated documents by Bristol Airport Limited in relation to its appeal against the decision of North Somerset Council on 13.3.2020 to refuse planning application 18/P/5118/OUT Submission to North Somerset Council By the Parish Councils Airport Association January 2021 1 This submission is based on detailed examination of some of the documents referred to in the Addendum to the Environmental Statement and associated documents . The Parish Councils Airport Association (PCAA) is a group of elected representatives from 26 parishes and one town which represent the local community interests. We cover a large area with parishes from Sedgemoor district, Bath and North East Somerset district as well as North Somerset district. The parishes the association represents are Barrow Gurney, Blagdon, Brockley, Burrington, Butcombe, Churchill, Cleeve, Dundry, Kingston Seymour, Long Ashton, Winford, Wraxall and Failand, Wrington (North Somerset) Chew Magna, Chew Stoke, Compton Dando, Compton Martin, Keynsham Town Council, Nempnett Thrubwell, Newton St Loe, Publow w Pensford, Stowey Sutton, Timsbury, Ubley (BANES), Shipham (Sedgemoor). The population within the Association equates to over 40,000 residents. The purpose of the PCAA is to advise and represent its member councils on matters affecting them which are connected with Bristol airport and its operations. It reports back to, and reflects the views of, some 25 parish councils and one town council which, in turn, are responsive to the views of many thousands of electors. We do not have the resources to run a media campaign or seek costly expert advice from consultants in various fields.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Nailsea
    TOWN OF NAILSEA THE ANNUAL TOWN MEETING was held on Wednesday 20th April 2016 at 7.30pm at the Tithe Barn, Church Lane, Nailsea. The Chairman, Cllr D Packham, welcomed the audience and introduced the staff and Councillors. He reported that Cllr’s Mary Blatchford, Mary Ponsonby, Ann Tonkin and James Tonkin were unable to attend. NOTICE CONVENING THE MEETING The Clerk informed the audience that the Notice convening the meeting had been displayed throughout the Town. He read the Notice to the audience and it was agreed that this Notice had been displayed as required by legislation. MINUTES The Chairman then asked the Clerk to read the minutes of the previous meeting held on Wednesday 22nd April 2015. It was proposed that as these had been provided prior to the meeting they be taken as read. This was agreed. It was proposed that these minutes were a correct record of that meeting and this was agreed. The Chairman signed the minutes as a correct record of that meeting and gave his annual report. CHAIRMAN’S ANNUAL REPORT The Chairman reported that in 1999 he moved to Nailsea from Taunton to be closer to Bristol where he was working at the time. He soon found a town with friendly people and has found over time a lot going on. For the active there are three sports centres offering a wide range of activities, thriving rugby, cricket and football clubs, a nationally recognised table tennis club, bowls club, a croquet club – which hosted the world championship a few years ago - and there are walking groups for those who enjoy a social walk.
    [Show full text]
  • Vision Document
    VISION OF A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE FOR FAILAND SITE PROMOTION DOCUMENT PREPARED BY HARROW ESTATES DECEMBER 2020 VISION FOR A SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITY AT FAILAND, BRISTOL ‘Placemaking underpins everything we do’ Harrow Estates Date: December 2020 Prepared by Boyer Project code: 20.2025 Written by CR Checked by AB This document is designed to be read at A3 size The contents of this document are not to be copied or reproduced without the written consent of Harrow Estates Ltd and Boyer. www.harrowestates.co.uk2 CONTENTS VISION Our Placemaking led approach for land at Failand Sustainable and Connected - Failand offers the best of town and country 1. Background living ... close to Bristol and Clifton and benefitting from frequent bus services and a network of walking and cycling routes, Failand lies on an existing under- 1.1 Planning Context 8 utilised transport corridor which connects Clevedon, Nailsea and Failand to 1.2 Why Failand? 10 Bristol via the B3128 (Clevedon Road). This corridor has been upgraded in 1.3 Supporting the District’s approach to growth 12 recent years and offers significant potential for growth. 1.4 An active and sustainable community at Failand 14 Minimising Green Belt Impacts - Well defined and visually enclosed by 2. Site Appraisal defining plantations to the south, Failand is also home to the playing fields of several Bristol schools, sports clubs and its supporting facilities. The site 2.1 The Site 22 sits at the interface of the settlement edge and these surrounding landscape 2.2 Growth of Failand 23 features and therefore presents the opportunity to create a well defined, 2.3 Green Belt 24 contained and sensitively considered addition to the settlement.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Item 7 West of England Planning, Housing And
    Agenda Item 7 West of England Planning, Housing and Communities Board 27 June 2016 Joint Spatial Plan and Transport Study – Update on Consultation and Programme Purpose of Report 1. To present the results of the consultation on the Joint Spatial Plan (JSP) and Joint Transport Study (JTS) that was undertaken between 9th November 2015 and 29th January 2016, and update members on next steps in the work programme for both work packages. Background 2. The JSP provides the joint framework to ensure development requirements come forward across the West of England authorities’ area up to 2036 in a co-ordinated manner. This co-operation on strategic planning matters is complemented by the approach which has been taken on strategic transport issues. A review of future strategic transport proposals is being undertaken through the JTS, to both inform future development proposals and develop future strategic transport proposals up to 2036, with delivery of this work coordinated with the JSP programme. 3. The councils are proposing to publish a Draft JSP Options document by Autumn 2016. The first stage in the preparation of the JSP was the publication of the Issues and Options (I&O) document, which highlighted the scale of the development issues and set out a range of potential locational options and spatial scenarios to address these. This consultation also covered the first stage of the JTS, and views were asked from stakeholders and the public on their perception of current challenges on the West of England’s transport network, JTS objectives and views on a range of interventions to address these challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • 0620 Various Roads Wraxall and Failand and Abbots Leigh Temporary Prohibition of Waiting Loading Order 2020
    Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 - Section 14 Notice of Temporary Traffic Regulation Order Various Roads, Wraxall and Failand and Abbots Leigh, North Somerset Temporary Prohibition of Waiting & Loading Order 2020 Date coming into force: 7 July 2020 Notice is hereby given that North Somerset Council in pursuance of the provisions of section 14 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 as amended, the Traffic Management Act 2004 as amended’ and of all other enabling powers, intend to make an order the effect of which will be to temporarily prohibit waiting and loading to all vehicles on the lengths of roads specified in the Schedule to this Notice. Exemptions are included for emergency services, works access and enforcement of the restrictions. This order is required because of the need to implement measures for public safety in response to the Covid-19 pandemic. This order will become operative on 7 June 2020 for a maximum period of 18 months. However, the closures may not be implemented for the whole of the period but only as necessitated in response to the Covid-19 situation. Appropriate traffic signs will be displayed when and where the measures are in force. Schedule - Manor Road, Abbots Leigh – its entire length. Weir Lane, Abbots Leigh – its entire length. Sandy Lane, Abbots Leigh – its entire length. Sandy Lane, Wraxall & Failand – its entire length. Harris Lane, Abbots Leigh – its entire length. Manor Lane, Abbots Leigh – its entire length For further information www.n-somerset.gov.uk/roadworks North Somerset Council, Town Hall, Weston-super-Mare BS23 1UJ 01934 888 802 .
    [Show full text]
  • Developing a Sustainable Framework for UK Aviation: Scoping Document
    Do not remove this if sending to Page Title Developing a sustainable framework for UK Aviation: Scoping document Summary of Responses July 2012 Contents Contents ......................................................................................................... 2 Overview......................................................................................................... 3 The Aviation Sector ........................................................................................ 5 International Connectivity................................................................................ 8 Regional Connectivity ................................................................................... 10 Making Better Use of Existing Capacity........................................................ 13 Climate Change Impacts............................................................................... 15 Local Impacts................................................................................................ 16 Any Other Comments ................................................................................... 21 Annex A - List of Respondents ..................................................................... 22 2 Overview 1. The Government published a scoping document in March 2011 seeking views and evidence on questions around six key themes: The Aviation Sector International Connectivity and Hub Airports Regional Connectivity and Regional Airports Making Better Use of Existing Capacity Climate Change Impacts Local Impacts
    [Show full text]
  • Proof of Evidence
    Witness 12 of 26, Residential Amenity PCCA/ W12/2 –Appendix to Proof of Evidence Expansion of Bristol Airport to 12mppa PINS Ref APP/D0121/W/20/3259234 Planning Application Ref: 18/P/5118/OUT Proof of Evidence for PCCA Hilary Burn Appendix Application no. 20/P/2896/APPCON. PLANNING APPEAL BY BRISTOL AIRPORT LIMITED IN RESPECT OF NORTH SIDE ROAD, FELTON (APPEAL REFERENCE: 3259234) - SUBMISSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT ADDENDUM, PASSENGER TRAFFIC FORECAST, ECONOMIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT ADDENDUM AND UPDATE TO THE PARKING DEMAND STUDY Response to Consultation on addendum to Environmental Statement and associated documents to Bristol Airport Planning Application 18/P/5118/OUT from Barrow Gurney Parish Council 1. Barrow Gurney Parish Council (BGPC) wishes to confirm its strong objection to the proposed expansion of Bristol Airport. 2. BGPC has previously lodged objections to proposals for, or related to the expansion of the airport: • In January 2019: in respect of application 18/P/5118/OUT • In November 2019: in respect of Additional Information supplied to application 18/P/ 5118/OUT • In October 2020: in respect of the Bristol Airport Ltd (Land at A38 and Downside Road) Compulsory Purchase Order 2020. BACKGROUND TO OUR OBJECTION 3. Barrow Gurney is a rural parish at the northernmost fringe of North Somerset District, bordering Bristol City. The village is approximately 6 miles by road from the City centre and only two miles as the crow flies from the Airport. It is located roughly midway between the A370 (Bristol - Weston super Mare) to the west and A38 (Bristol - Airport - Taunton) to the east. It is rural in character, a diffuse village comprising 4 main component parts: • the village centre, the core of which was declared a Conservation Area in June 2018, predominantly linear in nature on either side of the B3130 (Barrow Street) which links the A370 and A38.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Wraxall and Failand Parish Council Response to the West of England Joint Spatial Plan 2036 (JSP)
    Wraxall and Failand Parish Council Response to The West of England Joint Spatial Plan 2036 (JSP) - Technical Evidence Consultation, November 2018 1. Wraxall and Failand Parish Council (W&FPC) refers to submissions it made in January 2018 to the initial consultation on the JSP in which the main concerns highlighted were : economic growth was unrealistic and has driven up the housing numbers in the Strategic Development Locations (SDL), and the SDLs in North Somerset are not sustainable. 2. The Emerging Findings Transport Report WED 008 identifies proposed highway improvements and infrastructure for Nailsea and Backwell, at packages 1 – 4, designed to mitigate the development of the SDL in Nailsea. The total of these packages are estimated to cost £168m. However, it is unclear as to how this will be delivered in terms of precise location, route or technical detail. This is of concern, particularly as the JSP identifies that infrastructure is fundamental to mitigating the impact of the SDL in Nailsea. 3. It is recognised that transport infrastructure changes and mitigation would be necessary to deliver the proposed SDL in Nailsea . However it is considered that the proposals in Packages 1 – 4 referred to above do not deliver a fully integrated and viable transport solution. They do not address the fundamental traffic infrastructure problems to properly serve the SDL. The measures proposed seem to mainly move the problem around at certain pinch points. As such the proposed SDL in Nailsea is unsustainable. 4. The proposals do not adequately address: the important issues of traffic congestion across the Cumberland Basin. the issue of traffic associated with Bristol Airport.
    [Show full text]
  • AGENDA – Strategic Project Board
    Approved Minutes – Hinkley C Connection Group Friday 20th April 2012 at 1.00pm Committee Room, South Gloucestershire Council, Castle Street, Thornbury, Bristol, BS35 9BQ Invited Name Role Cllr Anne Fraser – Sedgemoor District Council Chair, Member Cllr Richard Burden– Sedgemoor District Council Member Cllr Bob Garner - North Somerset District Council Member Cllr Chris Morgan - West Somerset Council Member Cllr Matthew Riddle–South Gloucestershire Council Member Karin Taylor – National Trust Member Doug Bamsey (DB) – Sedgemoor District Council S PPA Board, Director of Regeneration Chris Ambrose, Wraxall and Failand Parish Council Member Cllr Robert Griffin – South Gloucestershire Council Member Graham Quick - North Somerset District Council PPA Board, Local Planning Team Leader Valerie Moody (VM) – Somerset County Council PPA Chair of Joint Project Team Rebecca Musto (RM) - Somerset County Council Communications Officer Paul Sobczyk (PS) – Sedgemoor District Council Project Manager Ken Taylor – West Somerset Council PPA Board, Deputy Planning Manager Gillian Ellis-King – South Gloucestershire PPA Board, Strategic Projects Manager Peter Bryant (PB) – National Grid PPA Board, Senior Project Manager Richard Walsh (RW) - National Grid PPA Board, Consents Officer. Ivan Stone (IS) - (for National Grid) 3g Communications Nikki Suri (NS)- National Grid Lead Project Manager Vicky Banham (VB)– Sedgemoor District Council Communications Manager Clive Goodman – Western Power Distribution Primary System Design Engineer presenting to the Meeting Apologies
    [Show full text]
  • Hinkley C Connection Group Approved Minutes of Meeting – Thursday 24Th October 2013
    Hinkley C Connection Group Approved Minutes of Meeting – Thursday 24th October 2013 Maunsel Room, The Canalside, Marsh Lane, Bridgwater, TA6 6LQ Invited Name Role Cllr Anne Fraser – Sedgemoor District Council Chair, Member Cllr Richard Burden – Sedgemoor District Council Member Cllr Bob Garner - North Somerset District Council Member Cllr Robert Griffin – South Gloucestershire Council Member Cllr Richard Parker - Compton Bishop Parish Member Alyn Jones - Somerset County Council PPA Board Andrew Goodchild – West Somerset Council PPA Board Valerie Moody - Somerset County Council Paul Sobczyk (PS) – Sedgemoor District Council PPA Project Manager & notes Vicky Banham (VB) – Sedgemoor District Council Observer Richard Walsh (RW) - National Grid PPA Board Peter Bryant (PB) – National Grid PPA Board Apologies Received Name Role Cllr David Hall – Somerset County Council Member Cllr David Huxtable– Somerset County Council Member Cllr Matthew Riddle–South Gloucestershire Council Member Cllr Anne Harley -North Somerset District Council Member Caroline Power – English Heritage Member Mark Funnell – National Trust Member Nikki Suri (NS)- National Grid Project Manager Apologies resulting from closure of the M5 Name Role Doug Bamsey (DB) – Sedgemoor District Council SDC Director and PPA Board Chris Ambrose, Wraxall and Failand Parish Council Member Simon Robertshaw – English Heritage Member Richard Matthews – Bristol City Council Planning Officer Ivan Stone (IS) - 3g Communications (for National Grid) Presenter Graham Quick - North Somerset District Council PPA Board Dave Pring – Environment Agency Member Gillian Ellis-King – South Gloucestershire PPA Board Cllr Chris Morgan - West Somerset Council Member Hinkley C Connection Group Approved Minutes of Meeting – Thursday 24th October 2013 Maunsel Room, The Canalside, Marsh Lane, Bridgwater, TA6 6LQ Agenda Item Note Action 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Over 10 Dwellings)
    Schedule of Allocated Sites and Local Green Space Schedule 1 Proposed large sites for residential development (over 10 dwellings) Schedule 2 Proposed Employment Sites Schedule 3 Safeguarded Employment Sites Schedule 4 3 Local Green Space Schedule 5 4 Proposed sites for community facilities Schedule 1 Schedule to Policy SA 1 Proposed large sites for residential development (over 10 dwellings) Sites marked * are the residential element of a mixed use scheme and are subject to Policy SA3 Development on these sites will need to conform to the Core Strategy, Sites and Policies Plan Part 1: Development Management Policies, relevant Supplementary Planning Documents and Neighbourhood Development Plans A site-specific flood risk assessment is required for proposals of 1 hectare or greater in Flood Zone 1; all proposals for new development (including minor development and change of use) in Flood Zones 2 and 3, or in an area within Flood Zone 1 which has critical drainage problems (as notified to the local planning authority by the Environment Agency); and where proposed development or a change of use to a more vulnerable class may be subject to other sources of flooding. Schedule 1 Status at April Relevant Capacity Site specific details/notes Site Location 2016 2017 planning remaining permission ref (at April 2016 2017 ) WESTON -SUPER -MARE Winterstoke Village Part full 10/P/0756/OT2 2233 Major strategic mixed use allocation from Core (former Weston consent, part 12/P/1510/OT2 1,986 Strategy. Airfield) * outline, part 13/P/0834/RM Further details in Weston Villages Supplementary approved 14/P/2723/RM Planning Document.
    [Show full text]