DOCSLIB.ORG

Agenda Item 7 West of England Planning, Housing And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Agenda Item 7 West of England Planning, Housing And Agenda Item 7 West of England Planning, Housing and Communities Board 27 June 2016 Joint Spatial Plan and Transport Study – Update on Consultation and Programme Purpose of Report 1. To present the results of the consultation on the Joint Spatial Plan (JSP) and Joint Transport Study (JTS) that was undertaken between 9th November 2015 and 29th January 2016, and update members on next steps in the work programme for both work packages. Background 2. The JSP provides the joint framework to ensure development requirements come forward across the West of England authorities’ area up to 2036 in a co-ordinated manner. This co-operation on strategic planning matters is complemented by the approach which has been taken on strategic transport issues. A review of future strategic transport proposals is being undertaken through the JTS, to both inform future development proposals and develop future strategic transport proposals up to 2036, with delivery of this work coordinated with the JSP programme. 3. The councils are proposing to publish a Draft JSP Options document by Autumn 2016. The first stage in the preparation of the JSP was the publication of the Issues and Options (I&O) document, which highlighted the scale of the development issues and set out a range of potential locational options and spatial scenarios to address these. This consultation also covered the first stage of the JTS, and views were asked from stakeholders and the public on their perception of current challenges on the West of England’s transport network, JTS objectives and views on a range of interventions to address these challenges. The joint consultation was designed to comply with statutory planning requirements and exceeds the minimum requirements set out in each of the individual council’s Statements of Community Involvement (SCI). 4. The consultation started as planned on 9 November 2015 and closed on 29 January 2016. Awareness-raising was undertaken utilising both traditional media and social media. In total the consultation generated 125 separate pieces of press and media coverage in local papers, TV and radio. A full communications and engagement campaign was delivered via social media utilising Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, SlideShare and YouTube. Face to face events, stakeholder meetings and public roadshows were also used to not only raise awareness of the consultation but also to gather views and opinions. In total over 40 events and roadshows were arranged, which engaged with over a 1,000 people. 5. The JSP consultation received 899 responses, made up of responses to the three surveys (technical, public & young people) and representations made via letter, email, postcard and formal submissions. The JTS consultation received 1 644 responses, made up of responses to the survey and representations made via letter, email, postcards and formal submissions. 6. Emerging themes from the consultation on both work-streams were presented to members in March 2016. Since then, further assessment has been undertaken of each of the representations received, and responses to those representations which have been categorised by theme or survey question. A comprehensive summary of the results is outlined in the Consultation Report attached as Appendix 1, and key messages are outlined below. The full representations are available to view on the consultation website. Key issues from the consultation on the Joint Spatial Plan 7. Most respondents agreed that the critical spatial issues had been identified in the I&O report, and that the Vision and objectives were appropriate. Many respondents considered that the total housing forecast presented in the report was about right, although housing developers thought that too few homes were being planned for, and members of the public and some town and parish councils considered the planned figure was too high. 8. Establishing a realistic target for the proportion of homes that should be affordable attracted significant representation. Housing developers felt that a substantial increase in the total proposed housing number would be needed to ensure enough affordable homes would be built, although members of the public considered that developers should provide a higher amount of affordable housing as part of their schemes, and that local authorities should be given a greater role as builders of affordable homes themselves. 9. Most respondents felt that all the reasonable strategic locations had been identified, although a number of other locations were also suggested. Respondents also generally agreed that a priority to build more homes in Bristol and our main towns was appropriate, although caveats were expressed about how this would be achieved. For example, members of the public thought that delivering transport and other infrastructure improvements would be vital to support further homes in already congested areas. 10.Most respondents felt that a combination of locations in the spatial scenarios presented in the I&O report would be most likely to deliver the plan’s objectives. In the public survey, the `Transport Focussed’ scenario was chosen most frequently, either in combination with others or alone. Protection of Green Belt was the second most frequently picked, again either in combination or alone. Key Issues from the Consultation on the Joint Transport Study 11.The consultation on the JTS presented an assessment of current `issues’ on the West of England’s transport network, proposed study objectives and suggested a range of possible `concepts’ for new transport investment, across a range of modes, to stimulate discussion and suggestions for possible schemes. 2 12.There was overall agreement with the assessment of current issues identified on the transport network, and `congestion, reliability, resilience and connectivity’ was the issue clearly rated to be most important by respondents. The most important study objective was seen to be improving Quality of Life, followed by reducing carbon emissions. However, again all study objectives presented had significant support. 13.Of the range of potential transport concepts suggested, those seen as most important by respondents were strengthening and enhancing public transport corridors, walking and cycling `superhighways’, and extending the MetroWest local rail services. Improving freight routes and facilities was considered the least important of the transport concepts proposed in the consultation. A wide range of suggestions for further specific schemes was also tabled by respondents, and these further suggestions are also being assessed as part of the current study phase prior to the preparation of transport proposals. Next Steps in the Programme 14.The views and comments received through the consultation and engagement programme are being taken into account in the assessment of spatial scenarios for development and the formulation of potential transport interventions to address both current issues and forecast development impacts. 15.Technical work is still underway on the appraisal of potential spatial options and transport packages. It is proposed that a recommendation on options for the spatial scenario and transport proposals will be presented to members by the end of September 2016, prior to the commencement of public consultation in Autumn 2016. 16.Key milestones moving forward include: • the publication of, and consultation on, the draft JSP Options in Autumn 2016, together with a recommended package of complementary transport investment to address both current challenges on the network and the impact of forecast development; • Completion of the JTS by December 2016, taking account of consultation representations; • Further consultation on a revised JSP in Spring 2017; • Submission of the JSP to the Secretary of State by Summer 2017; and • Inclusion of the recommendations from the JTS in an updated Joint Local Transport Plan by end 2017. Environmental Impact Assessment 17.The I&O document included consideration of the environmental impacts of its locational options and spatial scenarios. The JTS will include a strategic environmental summary of its recommended approach and packages. Following the completion of the study, its recommendations will be taken into account in the updating of the current Joint Local Transport Plan and draft of the Joint Spatial Plan. These will both include a full Strategic Environmental Assessment. 3 Risk 18.There are no risks arising directly from this report. Risks related to the JSP&TS will be managed through the Project Board. Resources (financial and personnel) 19.Resources to progress the JSP&TS are as prioritised in the respective council budgets. Equalities Implications 20.Whilst there are no direct implications arising from the recommendations in this report, equalities will be a key consideration of the JSP and JTS, and were intended to be reflected in the extent of stakeholder and public engagement undertaken in the recent public consultation. Views of Joint Scrutiny Committee 21.The Joint Scrutiny Committee (JSC) received a report on key themes arising through the consultation in March 2016; and further views will be summarised to the next meeting of the Planning, Housing & Communities Board. JSC members received copies of the Joint Transport Board papers prior to their meeting held on 17th June 2016 giving an opportunity to JSC members to provide views to the Board. Recommendation That Members note the update on consultation and the next steps in the programme and give views. Author: West of England LEP with support
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Local Listed Building Consent Order Secondary Glazing Tyntesfield
    Local Listed Building Consent Order 01 For secondary glazing at the Tyntesfield estate. 1 Table of Contents 1. Introduction. .................................................................................................................................. 3 1.1 Related Policy ........................................................................................................................ 3 2. The listed buildings cover by the order ..................................................................................... 3 3. Description of the consented works .......................................................................................... 4 4. Statement of reasons of the consented works ........................................................................ 4 5. Purpose of the order .................................................................................................................... 4 6. Term of order ................................................................................................................................ 4 7. Other Particulars .......................................................................................................................... 5 Order reviewed and approved by: ..................................................................................................... 5 8. Appendix One: plans for acceptable secondary glazing ........................................................ 6 9. Appendix Two: secondary glazing manufacturer details. .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bristol Airport Limited (Majority Owned by Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan, Canada)
    Applicant: Bristol Airport Limited (majority owned by Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan, Canada) Application 20/P/2896/APPCON- addendum to Environmental Statement and associated documents by Bristol Airport Limited in relation to its appeal against the decision of North Somerset Council on 13.3.2020 to refuse planning application 18/P/5118/OUT Submission to North Somerset Council By the Parish Councils Airport Association January 2021 1 This submission is based on detailed examination of some of the documents referred to in the Addendum to the Environmental Statement and associated documents . The Parish Councils Airport Association (PCAA) is a group of elected representatives from 26 parishes and one town which represent the local community interests. We cover a large area with parishes from Sedgemoor district, Bath and North East Somerset district as well as North Somerset district. The parishes the association represents are Barrow Gurney, Blagdon, Brockley, Burrington, Butcombe, Churchill, Cleeve, Dundry, Kingston Seymour, Long Ashton, Winford, Wraxall and Failand, Wrington (North Somerset) Chew Magna, Chew Stoke, Compton Dando, Compton Martin, Keynsham Town Council, Nempnett Thrubwell, Newton St Loe, Publow w Pensford, Stowey Sutton, Timsbury, Ubley (BANES), Shipham (Sedgemoor). The population within the Association equates to over 40,000 residents. The purpose of the PCAA is to advise and represent its member councils on matters affecting them which are connected with Bristol airport and its operations. It reports back to, and reflects the views of, some 25 parish councils and one town council which, in turn, are responsive to the views of many thousands of electors. We do not have the resources to run a media campaign or seek costly expert advice from consultants in various fields.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Nailsea
    TOWN OF NAILSEA THE ANNUAL TOWN MEETING was held on Wednesday 20th April 2016 at 7.30pm at the Tithe Barn, Church Lane, Nailsea. The Chairman, Cllr D Packham, welcomed the audience and introduced the staff and Councillors. He reported that Cllr’s Mary Blatchford, Mary Ponsonby, Ann Tonkin and James Tonkin were unable to attend. NOTICE CONVENING THE MEETING The Clerk informed the audience that the Notice convening the meeting had been displayed throughout the Town. He read the Notice to the audience and it was agreed that this Notice had been displayed as required by legislation. MINUTES The Chairman then asked the Clerk to read the minutes of the previous meeting held on Wednesday 22nd April 2015. It was proposed that as these had been provided prior to the meeting they be taken as read. This was agreed. It was proposed that these minutes were a correct record of that meeting and this was agreed. The Chairman signed the minutes as a correct record of that meeting and gave his annual report. CHAIRMAN’S ANNUAL REPORT The Chairman reported that in 1999 he moved to Nailsea from Taunton to be closer to Bristol where he was working at the time. He soon found a town with friendly people and has found over time a lot going on. For the active there are three sports centres offering a wide range of activities, thriving rugby, cricket and football clubs, a nationally recognised table tennis club, bowls club, a croquet club – which hosted the world championship a few years ago - and there are walking groups for those who enjoy a social walk.
    [Show full text]
  • Vision Document
    VISION OF A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE FOR FAILAND SITE PROMOTION DOCUMENT PREPARED BY HARROW ESTATES DECEMBER 2020 VISION FOR A SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITY AT FAILAND, BRISTOL ‘Placemaking underpins everything we do’ Harrow Estates Date: December 2020 Prepared by Boyer Project code: 20.2025 Written by CR Checked by AB This document is designed to be read at A3 size The contents of this document are not to be copied or reproduced without the written consent of Harrow Estates Ltd and Boyer. www.harrowestates.co.uk2 CONTENTS VISION Our Placemaking led approach for land at Failand Sustainable and Connected - Failand offers the best of town and country 1. Background living ... close to Bristol and Clifton and benefitting from frequent bus services and a network of walking and cycling routes, Failand lies on an existing under- 1.1 Planning Context 8 utilised transport corridor which connects Clevedon, Nailsea and Failand to 1.2 Why Failand? 10 Bristol via the B3128 (Clevedon Road). This corridor has been upgraded in 1.3 Supporting the District’s approach to growth 12 recent years and offers significant potential for growth. 1.4 An active and sustainable community at Failand 14 Minimising Green Belt Impacts - Well defined and visually enclosed by 2. Site Appraisal defining plantations to the south, Failand is also home to the playing fields of several Bristol schools, sports clubs and its supporting facilities. The site 2.1 The Site 22 sits at the interface of the settlement edge and these surrounding landscape 2.2 Growth of Failand 23 features and therefore presents the opportunity to create a well defined, 2.3 Green Belt 24 contained and sensitively considered addition to the settlement.
    [Show full text]
  • 0620 Various Roads Wraxall and Failand and Abbots Leigh Temporary Prohibition of Waiting Loading Order 2020
    Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 - Section 14 Notice of Temporary Traffic Regulation Order Various Roads, Wraxall and Failand and Abbots Leigh, North Somerset Temporary Prohibition of Waiting & Loading Order 2020 Date coming into force: 7 July 2020 Notice is hereby given that North Somerset Council in pursuance of the provisions of section 14 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 as amended, the Traffic Management Act 2004 as amended’ and of all other enabling powers, intend to make an order the effect of which will be to temporarily prohibit waiting and loading to all vehicles on the lengths of roads specified in the Schedule to this Notice. Exemptions are included for emergency services, works access and enforcement of the restrictions. This order is required because of the need to implement measures for public safety in response to the Covid-19 pandemic. This order will become operative on 7 June 2020 for a maximum period of 18 months. However, the closures may not be implemented for the whole of the period but only as necessitated in response to the Covid-19 situation. Appropriate traffic signs will be displayed when and where the measures are in force. Schedule - Manor Road, Abbots Leigh – its entire length. Weir Lane, Abbots Leigh – its entire length. Sandy Lane, Abbots Leigh – its entire length. Sandy Lane, Wraxall & Failand – its entire length. Harris Lane, Abbots Leigh – its entire length. Manor Lane, Abbots Leigh – its entire length For further information www.n-somerset.gov.uk/roadworks North Somerset Council, Town Hall, Weston-super-Mare BS23 1UJ 01934 888 802 .
    [Show full text]
  • Developing a Sustainable Framework for UK Aviation: Scoping Document
    Do not remove this if sending to Page Title Developing a sustainable framework for UK Aviation: Scoping document Summary of Responses July 2012 Contents Contents ......................................................................................................... 2 Overview......................................................................................................... 3 The Aviation Sector ........................................................................................ 5 International Connectivity................................................................................ 8 Regional Connectivity ................................................................................... 10 Making Better Use of Existing Capacity........................................................ 13 Climate Change Impacts............................................................................... 15 Local Impacts................................................................................................ 16 Any Other Comments ................................................................................... 21 Annex A - List of Respondents ..................................................................... 22 2 Overview 1. The Government published a scoping document in March 2011 seeking views and evidence on questions around six key themes: The Aviation Sector International Connectivity and Hub Airports Regional Connectivity and Regional Airports Making Better Use of Existing Capacity Climate Change Impacts Local Impacts
    [Show full text]
  • Proof of Evidence
    Witness 12 of 26, Residential Amenity PCCA/ W12/2 –Appendix to Proof of Evidence Expansion of Bristol Airport to 12mppa PINS Ref APP/D0121/W/20/3259234 Planning Application Ref: 18/P/5118/OUT Proof of Evidence for PCCA Hilary Burn Appendix Application no. 20/P/2896/APPCON. PLANNING APPEAL BY BRISTOL AIRPORT LIMITED IN RESPECT OF NORTH SIDE ROAD, FELTON (APPEAL REFERENCE: 3259234) - SUBMISSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT ADDENDUM, PASSENGER TRAFFIC FORECAST, ECONOMIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT ADDENDUM AND UPDATE TO THE PARKING DEMAND STUDY Response to Consultation on addendum to Environmental Statement and associated documents to Bristol Airport Planning Application 18/P/5118/OUT from Barrow Gurney Parish Council 1. Barrow Gurney Parish Council (BGPC) wishes to confirm its strong objection to the proposed expansion of Bristol Airport. 2. BGPC has previously lodged objections to proposals for, or related to the expansion of the airport: • In January 2019: in respect of application 18/P/5118/OUT • In November 2019: in respect of Additional Information supplied to application 18/P/ 5118/OUT • In October 2020: in respect of the Bristol Airport Ltd (Land at A38 and Downside Road) Compulsory Purchase Order 2020. BACKGROUND TO OUR OBJECTION 3. Barrow Gurney is a rural parish at the northernmost fringe of North Somerset District, bordering Bristol City. The village is approximately 6 miles by road from the City centre and only two miles as the crow flies from the Airport. It is located roughly midway between the A370 (Bristol - Weston super Mare) to the west and A38 (Bristol - Airport - Taunton) to the east. It is rural in character, a diffuse village comprising 4 main component parts: • the village centre, the core of which was declared a Conservation Area in June 2018, predominantly linear in nature on either side of the B3130 (Barrow Street) which links the A370 and A38.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Wraxall and Failand Parish Council Response to the West of England Joint Spatial Plan 2036 (JSP)
    Wraxall and Failand Parish Council Response to The West of England Joint Spatial Plan 2036 (JSP) - Technical Evidence Consultation, November 2018 1. Wraxall and Failand Parish Council (W&FPC) refers to submissions it made in January 2018 to the initial consultation on the JSP in which the main concerns highlighted were : economic growth was unrealistic and has driven up the housing numbers in the Strategic Development Locations (SDL), and the SDLs in North Somerset are not sustainable. 2. The Emerging Findings Transport Report WED 008 identifies proposed highway improvements and infrastructure for Nailsea and Backwell, at packages 1 – 4, designed to mitigate the development of the SDL in Nailsea. The total of these packages are estimated to cost £168m. However, it is unclear as to how this will be delivered in terms of precise location, route or technical detail. This is of concern, particularly as the JSP identifies that infrastructure is fundamental to mitigating the impact of the SDL in Nailsea. 3. It is recognised that transport infrastructure changes and mitigation would be necessary to deliver the proposed SDL in Nailsea . However it is considered that the proposals in Packages 1 – 4 referred to above do not deliver a fully integrated and viable transport solution. They do not address the fundamental traffic infrastructure problems to properly serve the SDL. The measures proposed seem to mainly move the problem around at certain pinch points. As such the proposed SDL in Nailsea is unsustainable. 4. The proposals do not adequately address: the important issues of traffic congestion across the Cumberland Basin. the issue of traffic associated with Bristol Airport.
    [Show full text]
  • AGENDA – Strategic Project Board
    Approved Minutes – Hinkley C Connection Group Friday 20th April 2012 at 1.00pm Committee Room, South Gloucestershire Council, Castle Street, Thornbury, Bristol, BS35 9BQ Invited Name Role Cllr Anne Fraser – Sedgemoor District Council Chair, Member Cllr Richard Burden– Sedgemoor District Council Member Cllr Bob Garner - North Somerset District Council Member Cllr Chris Morgan - West Somerset Council Member Cllr Matthew Riddle–South Gloucestershire Council Member Karin Taylor – National Trust Member Doug Bamsey (DB) – Sedgemoor District Council S PPA Board, Director of Regeneration Chris Ambrose, Wraxall and Failand Parish Council Member Cllr Robert Griffin – South Gloucestershire Council Member Graham Quick - North Somerset District Council PPA Board, Local Planning Team Leader Valerie Moody (VM) – Somerset County Council PPA Chair of Joint Project Team Rebecca Musto (RM) - Somerset County Council Communications Officer Paul Sobczyk (PS) – Sedgemoor District Council Project Manager Ken Taylor – West Somerset Council PPA Board, Deputy Planning Manager Gillian Ellis-King – South Gloucestershire PPA Board, Strategic Projects Manager Peter Bryant (PB) – National Grid PPA Board, Senior Project Manager Richard Walsh (RW) - National Grid PPA Board, Consents Officer. Ivan Stone (IS) - (for National Grid) 3g Communications Nikki Suri (NS)- National Grid Lead Project Manager Vicky Banham (VB)– Sedgemoor District Council Communications Manager Clive Goodman – Western Power Distribution Primary System Design Engineer presenting to the Meeting Apologies
    [Show full text]
  • Hinkley C Connection Group Approved Minutes of Meeting – Thursday 24Th October 2013
    Hinkley C Connection Group Approved Minutes of Meeting – Thursday 24th October 2013 Maunsel Room, The Canalside, Marsh Lane, Bridgwater, TA6 6LQ Invited Name Role Cllr Anne Fraser – Sedgemoor District Council Chair, Member Cllr Richard Burden – Sedgemoor District Council Member Cllr Bob Garner - North Somerset District Council Member Cllr Robert Griffin – South Gloucestershire Council Member Cllr Richard Parker - Compton Bishop Parish Member Alyn Jones - Somerset County Council PPA Board Andrew Goodchild – West Somerset Council PPA Board Valerie Moody - Somerset County Council Paul Sobczyk (PS) – Sedgemoor District Council PPA Project Manager & notes Vicky Banham (VB) – Sedgemoor District Council Observer Richard Walsh (RW) - National Grid PPA Board Peter Bryant (PB) – National Grid PPA Board Apologies Received Name Role Cllr David Hall – Somerset County Council Member Cllr David Huxtable– Somerset County Council Member Cllr Matthew Riddle–South Gloucestershire Council Member Cllr Anne Harley -North Somerset District Council Member Caroline Power – English Heritage Member Mark Funnell – National Trust Member Nikki Suri (NS)- National Grid Project Manager Apologies resulting from closure of the M5 Name Role Doug Bamsey (DB) – Sedgemoor District Council SDC Director and PPA Board Chris Ambrose, Wraxall and Failand Parish Council Member Simon Robertshaw – English Heritage Member Richard Matthews – Bristol City Council Planning Officer Ivan Stone (IS) - 3g Communications (for National Grid) Presenter Graham Quick - North Somerset District Council PPA Board Dave Pring – Environment Agency Member Gillian Ellis-King – South Gloucestershire PPA Board Cllr Chris Morgan - West Somerset Council Member Hinkley C Connection Group Approved Minutes of Meeting – Thursday 24th October 2013 Maunsel Room, The Canalside, Marsh Lane, Bridgwater, TA6 6LQ Agenda Item Note Action 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Over 10 Dwellings)
    Schedule of Allocated Sites and Local Green Space Schedule 1 Proposed large sites for residential development (over 10 dwellings) Schedule 2 Proposed Employment Sites Schedule 3 Safeguarded Employment Sites Schedule 4 3 Local Green Space Schedule 5 4 Proposed sites for community facilities Schedule 1 Schedule to Policy SA 1 Proposed large sites for residential development (over 10 dwellings) Sites marked * are the residential element of a mixed use scheme and are subject to Policy SA3 Development on these sites will need to conform to the Core Strategy, Sites and Policies Plan Part 1: Development Management Policies, relevant Supplementary Planning Documents and Neighbourhood Development Plans A site-specific flood risk assessment is required for proposals of 1 hectare or greater in Flood Zone 1; all proposals for new development (including minor development and change of use) in Flood Zones 2 and 3, or in an area within Flood Zone 1 which has critical drainage problems (as notified to the local planning authority by the Environment Agency); and where proposed development or a change of use to a more vulnerable class may be subject to other sources of flooding. Schedule 1 Status at April Relevant Capacity Site specific details/notes Site Location 2016 2017 planning remaining permission ref (at April 2016 2017 ) WESTON -SUPER -MARE Winterstoke Village Part full 10/P/0756/OT2 2233 Major strategic mixed use allocation from Core (former Weston consent, part 12/P/1510/OT2 1,986 Strategy. Airfield) * outline, part 13/P/0834/RM Further details in Weston Villages Supplementary approved 14/P/2723/RM Planning Document.
    [Show full text]
  • STATEMENT of PERSONS NOMINATED and NOTICE of POLL Date of Election : Thursday 7 May 2015
    North Somerset STATEMENT OF PERSONS NOMINATED AND NOTICE OF POLL Date of Election : Thursday 7 May 2015 1. Polling will take place between the hours of 7:00 am to 10:00 pm on Thursday 7 May 2015, for the election of Parish Councillors for each of the undermentioned Wards, there remaining in each case more validly nominated candidates than seats. 2. The name, description (if any) and address of each candidates, together with the names of proposer, seconder and assentors are shown below for each Ward. 3. Any candidate who an entry in the last column (invalid), in no longer standing at this election 4. Where contested this poll is taken together with the election of District Councillors and the election of a Member of Parliament for the North Somerset Constituency Abbots Leigh Name of Candidate Home Address Description (if any) Name of Proposer Invalid BUTLER The Mansard, 3 Home Farm Road, Telling J P, Stevens Dave, , , , , , , , John Abbots Leigh, North Somerset, BS8 3QF TALBOT-PONSONBY West Barn, Home Farm Road, Abbots Stembridge P K, Smith A N, , , , , , , , Simon Leigh, Bristol, BS8 3QF TELLING April Cottage, 60 Church Road, Abbots Talbot-Ponsonby S, Butler M J, , , , , , , , Audrey Jennifer Leigh, BS8 3QU Backwell Name of Candidate Home Address Description (if any) Name of Proposer Invalid BOWERMAN Cider House, Backwell Common, 5 Years Experience Ould Sarah Anne, Taylor R, , , , , , , , Maureen Elizabeth Backwell, North Somerset, BS48 3AD COLE 7 Robinson Way, Backwell, Bristol, Local Resident Taylor R, Day R R, , , , , , , , Christopher
    [Show full text]