Foot2011.Txt

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Foot2011.Txt Foot2011.txt Footnote FOR 201199 4/19/2012 3:53:27 PM STATE COUNTY ID STATE ABBR COUNTY NAME AND PLACE and FOOTNOTE ----- ---- ------ ---------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 01 001 409000 AL Autauga County Prattville Permit system also covers the portion of Prattville that is located in Elmore County. 01 003 034000 AL Baldwin County Baldwin County Unincorporated Area Permit system also covers Elberta, Magnolia Springs and Perdido Beach (2010) towns. Perdido Beach town is newly incorporated . 01 003 179000 AL Baldwin County Foley Permit system also covers an area of 3.3 square miles. 01 003 470000 AL Baldwin County Summerdale town Permit system also covers a 1 1/2-mile radius beyond the town limits. 01 007 365900 AL Bibb County Woodstock town Permit system also covers the portion of Woodstock town that is located inTuscaloosa County. 01 013 201000 AL Butler County Georgiana town Permit system also covers a 1-mile radius beyond the city limits. 01 015 383000 AL Calhoun County Oxford Permit system also covers the portion of Oxford that is located in Talladega County. 01 015 398000 AL Calhoun County Piedmont Permit system also covers the portion of Piedmont that is located in Cherokee County. 01 017 276000 AL Chambers County Lafayette Permit system discontinued. 01 021 316000 AL Chilton County Maplesville town Permit system discontinued. 01 027 023000 AL Clay County Ashland Page 1 Foot2011.txt Previously published as Ashland town (2011). 01 031 155000 AL Coffee County Enterprise Permit system also covers the portion of Enterprise that is located in Dale County. 01 043 195000 AL Cullman County Garden City town Permit system also covers the portion of Garden City town that is located in Blount County. 01 047 129000 AL Dallas County Dallas County Unincorporated Area Permit system also covers Orrville (2011) town. 01 047 381000 AL Dallas County Orrville town See footnote for Dallas County Unincorporated Area. 01 049 106000 AL DeKalb County Collinsville town Permit system also covers the portion of Collinsville town that is located in Cherokee County. 01 051 331000 AL Elmore County Millbrook Permit system also covers the portion of Millbrook that is located in Autauga County. Permit system also covers the police j urisdiction which extends three miles beyond the city limits. 01 051 481000 AL Elmore County Tallassee Permit system also covers the portion of Tallassee that is located in Tallapoosa County. 01 051 529000 AL Elmore County Wetumpka Permit system also covers the police jurisdiction which extends beyond the city limits. 01 055 207000 AL Etowah County Glencoe Permit system also covers the portion of Glencoe that is located in Calhoun County. 01 055 442000 AL Etowah County Sardis City town Permit system also covers the portion of Sardis City town that is located in Marshall County. 01 055 461000 AL Etowah County Southside Permit system also covers the portion of Southside that is located in Calhoun County. Page 2 Foot2011.txt 01 065 004000 AL Hale County Akron town Permit system discontinued. 01 065 347000 AL Hale County Moundville Permit system also covers the portion of Moundville city that is located in Tuscaloosa County. Previously published as Moundv ille (2011) town. 01 069 141000 AL Houston County Dothan Permit system also covers the portions of Dothan that are located in Dale and Henry Counties. 01 069 484000 AL Houston County Taylor town Permit system, which also covers the portion of Taylor town that is located in Geneva County, discontinued. 01 071 252000 AL Jackson County Hollywood town Permit system also covers a 1 1/2-mile radius beyond the town limits. 01 071 466000 AL Jackson County Stevenson Permit system discontinued. 01 073 048000 AL Jefferson County Birmingham Permit system also covers the portion of Birmingham that is located in Shelby County. 01 073 116000 AL Jefferson County County Line town Permit system also covers the portion of County Line town that is located in Blount County. 01 073 254000 AL Jefferson County Hoover Permit system also covers the portion of Hoover that is located in Shelby County. 01 073 268000 AL Jefferson County Jefferson County Unincorporated Area Permit system also covers Center Point and Pinson cities; the portion of Argo town located in Jefferson County; and Cardiff a nd Mulga (2011) towns. 01 073 284000 AL Jefferson County Leeds Permit system also covers the portions of Leeds that are located in St. Clair and Shelby Counties. Page 3 Foot2011.txt 01 073 352000 AL Jefferson County Mulga town See footnote for Jefferson County Unincorporated Area. 01 073 494000 AL Jefferson County Trussville Permit system also covers the portion of Trussville that is located in St. Clair County. 01 073 507000 AL Jefferson County Vestavia Hills Permit system also covers the portion of Vestavia Hills that is located in Shelby County. 01 077 178000 AL Lauderdale County Florence Permit system also covers a 3-mile radius beyond the city limits. 01 077 464000 AL Lauderdale County St. Florian town Permit system also covers a 1 1/2-mile radius beyond the town limits. 01 081 283000 AL Lee County Lee County Unincorporated Area Permit system also covers Smith Station city. 01 085 043000 AL Lowndes County Benton town Permit system discontinued. 01 085 305000 AL Lowndes County Lowndes County Unincorporated Area Permit system also covers Gordonville, Mosses, and White Hall towns. 01 087 370000 AL Macon County Notasulga town Permit system also covers the portion of Notasulga town that is located in Lee County. 01 087 451000 AL Macon County Shorter town Permit system also covers a 1 1/2-mile radius beyond the town limits. 01 089 259000 AL Madison County Huntsville Permit system also covers the portion of Huntsville that is located in Limestone County. 01 089 312000 AL Madison County Madison Permit system also covers the portion of Madison that is located in Limestone County. Page 4 Foot2011.txt 01 093 536000 AL Marion County Winfield Permit system also covers the portion of Winfield that is located in Fayette County. 01 095 016000 AL Marshall County Arab Permit system also covers the portion of Arab that is located in Cullman County. 01 095 056000 AL Marshall County Boaz Permit system also covers the portion of Boaz that is located in Etowah County. 01 095 215000 AL Marshall County Grant town Permit system discontinued. 01 097 038000 AL Mobile County Bayou La Batre Permit system has extended its corporate limits by 2.2 square miles. 01 099 337000 AL Monroe County Monroeville Permit system also covers 3 miles beyond its city limits. 01 101 339000 AL Montgomery County Montgomery Permit system also covers a 3-mile radius beyond the city limits. 01 101 400700 AL Montgomery County Pike Road town Permit system also covers a 1 1/2-mile radius beyond its town limits. 01 103 136000 AL Morgan County Decatur Permit system also covers the portion of Decatur that is located in Limestone County. 01 103 411000 AL Morgan County Priceville town Permit system also covers a 1 1/2-mile radius beyond the town limits. 01 113 394000 AL Russell County Phenix City Permit system also covers the portion of Phenix City that is located in Lee County. Permit system also covers the police jur isdiction which extends beyond the city limits. 01 113 433000 AL Russell County Russell County Unincorporated Area Page 5 Foot2011.txt Permit system also covers Hurtsboro (2011) town. 01 117 072000 AL Shelby County Calera Permit system also covers the portion of Calera that is located in Chilton County. 01 117 243000 AL Shelby County Helena Permit system also covers the portion of Helena that is located in Jefferson County. 01 117 338000 AL Shelby County Montevallo Permit system previously covered by Shelby County (2011) Unincorporated Area. 01 117 449000 AL Shelby County Shelby County Unincorporated Area Permit system no longer covers Montevallo (2011) city, which began its own permit system. 01 117 510000 AL Shelby County Vincent town Permit system also covers the portions of Vincent town that are located in St. Clair and Talladega Counties. 01 117 528000 AL Shelby County Westover Previously published as Westover town (2011). 01 123 480000 AL Tallapoosa County Tallapoosa County Unincorporated Area Permit system also covers Jacksons Gap (2011) and New Site (2011) towns. 01 125 368000 AL Tuscaloosa County Northport Permit system also covers the police jurisdiction which extends three miles beyond the city limits. 01 125 495000 AL Tuscaloosa County Tuscaloosa Permit system also covers the police jurisdiction which extends three miles beyond the city limits. 01 125 505000 AL Tuscaloosa County Vance town Permit system also covers the portion of Vance town that is located in Bibb County. 01 127 151000 AL Walker County Eldridge town Permit system also covers a 1 1/2-mile radius beyond the town limits. 01 127 469000 AL Walker County Sumiton Page 6 Foot2011.txt Permit system, which also covered the portion of Sumiton city located in Jefferson County, discontinued . 01 131 403000 AL Wilcox County Pine Hill town Permit system discontinued. 01 133 231000 AL Winston County Haleyville Permit system also covers the portion of Haleyville that is located in Marion County. 02 000 069000 AK Alaska Balance of State Balance of State-Part 1 Anchorage Permit system covers all areas of the Aleutians East Borough, Aleutians West Census Area , Bethel Census Area, Dillingham Cen sus Area, Kenai Peninsula Borough, Lake and Peninsula Borough, Matanuska-Susitna Borough, Nome Census Area, Northwest ArcticB orough, Valdez-Cordova Census Area, and Wade Hampton Census Area that are not shown separately. 02 000 073000 AK Alaska Balance of State Balance of State-Part 2 Fairbanks Permit system covers all areas of the Denali Borough, Southeast Fairbanks Census Area, and Yukon-Koyukyk Census Area that are not shown separately.
Recommended publications
  • Lorain, Ohio: a Study in Urban Geography*
    THE OHIO JOURNAL OF SCIENCE VOL. XXXV MAY, 1935 No. 3 LORAIN, OHIO: A STUDY IN URBAN GEOGRAPHY* R. B. FROST, Oberlin College TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION 140 PART I. THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT A. REGIONAL ASPECTS 1. Lake Erie and the Great Lakes Chain 142 2. The Lake Plain 143 (a) Geological Section 3. Appalachian Plateau 145 (a) Northern Glaciated Section (b) Unglaciated Section 4. Climate and Aboriginal Forest Cover 146 B. SITE CHARACTERISTICS 1. Black River and its Estuary 148 2. Lake Erie Shoreline 150 PART II. SEQUENT STAGES OF HUMAN OCCUPANCE (1755-1894) A. THE LANDSCAPE DURING THE INDIAN PERIOD 1. Indian Occupance 151 2. Indian Removal 152 B. THE LANDSCAPE DURING THE PIONEER PERIOD 1. Interim Period 153 2. Village Birth 154 3. Pioneer Developments 155 C. LANDSCAPE DURING THE PERIOD OF GROWTH 1. Agri-functional Character of the Village 158 2. Durand Survey 159 3. Village Extensions 160 4. Population Increase 160 D. A DECADENT VILLAGE 1. Effects of Railroad Expansion on Charleston 161 2. Decline of Population 162 3. Trade Decline 162 4. Persistence of Certain Industries 164 *Publication of this paper is made possible by a grant-in-aid from the trustees of the Research Fund of the Ohio Academy of Science. 139 140 R. B. FROST Vol. XXXV E. THE LANDSCAPE OF THE EARLY INDUSTRIAL PERIOD: A REVIVAL 1. Functional Changes 166 PART III. MODERN LANDSCAPE (1894-1932) A. RECENT GROWTH AND EXTENSION OF LORAIN 1. Landscape Characteristics 173 2. Present Plan 176 B. ELEMENTS OF THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE 1. Heavy Industrial 182 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ohio & Lake Erie Regional Rail Ohio Hub Study
    The Ohio & Lake Erie Regional Rail Ohio Hub Study TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM & BUSINESS PLAN July 2007 Prepared for The Ohio Rail Development Commission Indiana Department of Transportation Michigan Department of Transportation New York Department of Transportation Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Prepared by: Transportation Economics & Management Systems, Inc. In association with HNTB, Inc. The Ohio & Lake Erie Regional Rail - Ohio Hub Study Technical Memorandum & Business Plan Table of Contents Foreword...................................................................................................................................... viii Acknowledgements..........................................................................................................................x Executive Summary.........................................................................................................................1 1. Introduction....................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 System Planning and Feasibility Goals and Objectives................................................... 1-3 1.2 Business Planning Objectives.......................................................................................... 1-4 1.3 Study Approach and Methodology .................................................................................. 1-4 1.4 Railroad Infrastructure Analysis...................................................................................... 1-5 1.5 Passenger
    [Show full text]
  • Ii Ii Will There Be Two Daily Amtrak Trains in the Cleveland-Pittsburgh Corridor? Oarp Continues Work for New Services!
    II II JUNE 1989 OHIO ASSOCIATION OF RAILROAO PASSENGERS ISSUE #83 WILL THERE BE TWO DAILY AMTRAK TRAINS IN THE CLEVELAND-PITTSBURGH CORRIDOR? OARP CONTINUES WORK FOR NEW SERVICES! A Cleveland- Pittsburgh Update by KEN PRENDERGAST, Coordinator of OARP's new Cleveland­ Pittsburgh Corridor Special Project ! This is the first column I am writing as Coordinator for ,I II the newly-established Cleveland-Pittsburgh Corridor Pro­ 1 1 II ject. At the OARP Board Meeting on May 20th, the Board II :, approved the creation of an OARP Special Project for the II II CLE-PIT Corridor, and whereby I would be the Coordinator I 'I for this Project. I appreciate this opportunity to lead this worthwhile and successful effort! This new Special Project will not drain on OARP's Treasury. Expenses will li 1i II I be incurred only as Project-specific contributions are re­ I' ceived. OARP has made requests for contributions ranging II II :1 I from $500 ot $4000 from various on-line communities and businesses. As the grant money comes in, Project expenses il will be incurred, but not before. If you have ideas of ,,I who should be approached for grant money, let me know. : ~ Enough talk of what we're going to do. I would like to update some of what OARP and Amtrak have been doing in the last two months ... Foremost, the Amtrak study on the PENNSYLVANIAN extension is essentially complete. However, it has not been released to the public as of this writing. I am disappointed that Amtrak is dragging their feet on the completion and release of the study's final results.
    [Show full text]
  • Deadly Crossing by Mark J
    1935 - 2013 VOLUME 44 NUMBER 4 DISTRICT 2 - CHAPTER WEBSITE: WWW.NRHS1.ORG APRIL 2013 DEADLY CROSSING BY MARK J. PRICE - AKRON BEACON JOURNAL STAFF WRITER Precious seconds ticked away as the Ohio National Guard convoy rumbled through the streets of Barberton (Ohio). Time was the enemy. Unexpected delays and unfortunate circumstances put the armored military vehicles on a collision course with disaster. When the locomotive's horn shrieked, it already was too late. An Erie Railroad passenger train slammed into a 33-ton Army tank on April 29, 1951, in a tragic accident that caught everyone by surprise. ''It sounded like the whole end of Barberton was blowing up when the train hit the tank,'' eyewitness Earl Lybarger told the Beacon Journal after the crash. ''My wife fainted when she saw the locomotive would not miss the tank.'' If only a few things had gone right, it would have been just another Sunday afternoon. More than 60 members from Company B of the 137th Tank Battalion in Barberton took a four-hour slog to Greensburg and back. In a pelting rain, a Summit County sheriff's cruiser led a ''motor march'' of National Guard trucks, jeeps and tanks to a practice field at state routes 241 and 619. The reserve unit conducted maneuvers before beginning the return trip to Barberton. Near the AN OHIO NATIONAL GUARD TANK SITS ASTRIDE TWISTED RAILS AFTER BEING STRUCK BY AN ERIE city limits, the convoy sputtered. One of its three Sherman tanks ran out of gas RAILROAD PASSENGER TRAIN ON APRIL 29, 1951, AT THE FAIRVIEW AVENUE CROSSING IN because of a faulty fuel gauge.
    [Show full text]
  • The Marketing and Distribution of Fruits and Vegetables by Motor Truck
    TECHNICAL BULLETIN NO. 272 OCTOBER, 1931 THE MARKETING AND DISTRIBUTION OF FRUITS AND VEGETABLES BY MOTOR TRUCK BY BRICE EDWARDS Assistant Marketing Specialist AND J. W. PARK Agricultural Economist^ Division 0} Fruits and VegetohUs Bureau of Agricultural Economics UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, WASHINGTON, D. C. For sale by the Superintendent of Document», Washington, D. C. Price 20 cents TECHNICAL BULLETEST NO. 272 OCTOBER, 1931 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE WASHINGTON, D. 0. THE MARKETING AND DISTRIBUTION OF FRUITS AND VEGETABLES BY MOTOR TRUCK By BRICB EDWABDS, Assistant MarTcetmff Specialist, and J. W. PARK, Agricul- tural Economist^ Division of Fruits anäf Vegetables, Bureau of Agricultural Eoonomdos CONTENTS Page Page Introduction--.--.—.- 1 Motor-truck transportation in various sec- Scope of study and source of information 2 tions—Continued. Motor-truck transportation classified 2 New York, Hudson Valley 39 Quantity shipped by motor truck compared New York, Long Island 40 with quantity shipped by railroad and New York^ western - 42 boat - 3 Connecticut and Massachusetts 45 Receipts on city markets 6 Southeastern Pennsylvania 46 Trade and operating practices of— Southern Indiana and southern Illinois.. 47 Truckmen 8 Southwestern Michigan ___ 53 Farmers. 8 North Carolina ... 57 Truckmen carriers 10 Texas 58 Truckmen merchants 14 Motor-truck unloads in certain cities 58 Economic aspects of shipping by truck in Boston 58 marketing fruits and vegetables 18 Cincinnati 61 Effect upon distribution 18 Denver _ 62 Effect upon production 20 New York City... 62 Effect upon transportation__ 21 Los Angeles _. 66 Regional motor-truck markets 21 Salt Lake City . 69 Wholesale roadside markets.
    [Show full text]
  • All Small-Sized Cwss That Have Certified Completion of Their RRA (Pdf)
    Community water systems serving a population of 3,001 to 49,999 that certified completion of a risk and resilience assessment as required by Section 2013 of America's Water Infrastructure Act, as of July 30, 2021. PWSID Community Water System Town/City State ZIP Code 1 001570671 PACE WATER SYSTEM, INC. PACE FL 32571-0750 2 010106001 MPTN Water Treatment Department Mashantucket CT 06338 3 010109005 Mohegan Tribal Utility Authority Uncasville CT 06382 4 020000005 ST. REGIS MOHAWK TRIBE Akwesasne NY 13655 5 043740039 CHEROKEE WATER SYSTEM CHEROKEE NC 28719 6 055293201 MT. PLEASANT Mount Pleasant MI 48858 7 055293603 East Bay Water Works Peshawbestown MI 49682 8 055293611 HANNAHVILLE COMMUNITY WILSON MI 49896-9728 9 055293702 LITTLE RIVER TRIBAL WATER SYSTEM Manistee MI 49660 10 055294502 Prairie Island Indian Community Welch MN 55089 11 055294503 Lower Sioux Indian Community Morton MN 56270 12 055294506 South Water Treatment Plant Prior Lake MN 55372 13 055295003 SOUTH-CENTRAL WATER SYSTEM Bowler WI 54416 14 055295310 Giiwedin Hayward WI 54843 15 055295401 Lac du Flambeau Lac du Flambeau WI 54538 16 055295508 KESHENA KESHENA WI 54135 17 055295703 ONEIDA #1 OR SITE #1 ONEIDA WI 54155 18 061020808 POTTAWATOMIE CO. RWD #3 (DALE PLANT) Shawnee OK 74804 19 061620001 Reservation Water System Eagle Pass TX 78852 20 062004336 Chicksaw Winstar Water System Ada OK 74821 21 063501100 POJOAQUE SOUTH Santa Fe NM 87506 22 063501109 Isleta Eastside Isleta NM 87022 23 063501124 Pueblo of Zuni - Zuni Utility Department Zuni NM 87327 24 063503109 Isleta Shea Whiff Isleta NM 87022 25 063503111 LAGUNA VALLEY LAGUNA, NM 87026 NM 87007 26 063506008 Mescalero Apache Inn of the Mountain Gods Public Water System Mescalero NM 88340 27 070000003 SAC & FOX (MESKWAKI) IN IOWA TAMA IA 52339 28 083090091 TOWN OF BROWNING BROWNING MT 59417 29 083890023 Turtle Mountain Public Utilities Commission Belcourt ND 58316 30 083890025 Spirit Lake Water Management RWS St.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    - A Population Map for Indiana for 1940 Wallace T. Buckley, Indiana University The Distribution of Indiana's Population The number of people in Indiana and their distribution, according to the 1940 Census, are graphically represented in Figure l. 1 This repre- sentation is accomplished by the use of a series of comparative circles for inhabitants of incorporated towns and dots for the rural population. The areas of the circles are proportional to the size of the towns repre- sented. For cities having a population over 10,000, the actual political boundaries are shown. The dots, each representing one hundred rural inhabitants, are localized by townships. The use of dots and comparative circles for the representation of distributional phenomena is a method widely used by geographers in 3 4 population studies. - The outstanding feature of Indiana's urban population distribution is the dominant position held by Indianapolis. This city, about three times as large as the second ranking city, lies at the geographic center of the state. It also dominates the most highly urbanized area, a tri- angular region bounded by lines drawn northeastward from Terre Haute to Fort Wayne and from Terre Haute eastward to Richmond. In or near this region are found twenty of Indiana's thirty-five cities with populations in excess of 10,000. A second highly urbanized belt extends from Goshen, in the north- central part of the state, westward to include Indiana's lake cities. Here are ten of the state's cities with populations of 10,000 or more. The remaining five cities in this class are in southern Indiana with the Ohio Valley centers of Evansville and New Albany-Jeffersonville the largest.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chicago Water Diversion Controversy, III, 31 Marq
    Marquette Law Review Volume 31 Article 3 Issue 1 May 1947 The hicC ago Water Diversion Controversy, III Herbert H. Naujoks Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr Part of the Law Commons Repository Citation Herbert H. Naujoks, The Chicago Water Diversion Controversy, III, 31 Marq. L. Rev. 28 (1947). Available at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr/vol31/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Marquette Law Review by an authorized administrator of Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE CHICAGO WATER DIVERSION CONTROVERSY* HERBERT H. NAUJOKS PART THREE: WHAT OF THE FUTURE? (a) In General In Parts One and Two of this article the writer discussed the history and background of the Chicago Water Diversion Controversy, the decisions rendered by the United States Supreme Court, the various rulings of the Governmental officials and Departments, the efforts made in Congress and in the Supreme Court to authorize a large diversion, the present status of the problem, and finally the legal questions that were or still are involved. Almost a half century of litigation and dispute has failed to settle permanently this im- portant problem, and the question arises, "What of the future ?". How can this perennial problem be settled once and for all? To attempt to answer this, one must consider not only the rulings of the Court but also the physical and engineering details of the sewage disposal and water supply problems of metropolitan Chicago.
    [Show full text]
  • CLEVELAND and CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO a Resilient Region’S Responses to Reclaiming Vacant Properties
    CLEVELAND AND CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO A Resilient Region’s Responses to Reclaiming Vacant Properties May 2014 PREPARED BY Vacant Property Research Network A Research Initiative of the Metropolitan Institute of Virginia Tech 1021 Prince St, Suite 100 | Alexandria, VA 22314 vacantpropertyresearch.com / www.mi.vt.edu STUDY TEAM: Joseph Schilling, L L.M. (Principal Author) Director of the Metropolitan Institute Professor, Urban Affairs & Planning Program Virginia Tech Alexandria, VA, USA Lisa Schamess, Co-Author and Project Editor Research and Editorial Team: Lauren Bulka, Research Associate Jessica Hanff, Research & Operations Manager Kim Hodgson, Researcher and Template Design Katie Wells, PhD, Post-Doctoral Researcher May 2014 acknowledgments The authors thank the Ford Foundation for its support, as well as the many individuals who contributed to or supported this case study, particularly officials and staff from the City of Cleveland, Cuyahoga County, and first tier suburban cities; nonprofit organizations and institutions; and public and civic leaders, representatives, and citizens who participated in interviews, shared documents and images, and reviewed drafts of this case study over the life of this project from 2011 to 2014. Special thanks go to the following individuals: • Frank Ford, Senior Policy Advisor, Thriving Communities Institute • Kermit Lind, Cleveland-Marshall College of Law (Emeritus), Cleveland State University • Kamla Lewis, City of Shaker Heights, Director, Neighborhood Revitalization • Sally Martin, City of South Euclid,
    [Show full text]
  • The Phoebe Snow on the Road of Anthracite
    1935 - 2015 VOLUME 46 NUMBER 3 DISTRICT 2 - CHAPTER W EBSITE : W W W .NRHS 1. ORG MARCH 2015 The Phoebe Snow on The Road of Anthracite HISTORY AND ROUTE The train was named as part of the DL&W's marketing campaign, around 1900, along with the fictional character of Phoebe Snow to emphasize how the exhaust from its steam locomotives was cleaner than competitors' locomotives, as a result of using anthracite coal. It traveled across New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and the Southern Tier of New York. The line's route pass over the Paulinskill Viaduct and the Delaware River Viaduct of the Lackawanna Cutoff in northeastern New Jersey and the Tunkhannock Viaduct on the portion of its route between Scranton, Pennsylvania to Binghamton, New York. DELAWARE LACKAWANNA & WESTERN ERA (1949-60) On November 15, 1949, the DL&W inaugurated a new streamlined passenger train named after its long-dormant promotional symbol, Pho ebe Snow. Launched by DL&W president William White, the new Phoebe Snow represented the DL&W's modernization of its passenger train fleet, and image, as it became Train No. 3 (westbound) and No. 6 (eastbound), which previously had been assigned the railroad's former premier train, the Lackawanna Limited . The Phoebe Snow ran on a daylight schedule between Hoboken, New Jersey, and Buffalo, New York, making the 396-mile (639-km) trip in about eight hours. Westbound, the sleepers and some coaches would continue on to Chicago, Illinois, over the Nickel Plate Railroad's Nickel Plate Limited and, on return, would be attached in Buffalo to Train No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Lake Erie Is a Result of a Grant Received from the George Gund Foundation, Cleveland Ohio, by Drs
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 361 227 SE 053 776 AUTHOR Fortner, Rosanne W., Ed.; Mayer, Victor J., Ed. TITLE The Great Like Erie: A Reference Text for Educators and Communicators. INSTITUTION Ohio State Univ., Columbus. Ohio Sea Grant Program. SPONS AGENCY George Gund Foundation, Cleveland, Ohlo. PUB DATE 93 NOTE 161p. AVAILABLE FROMOhio Sea Grant Publications, The Ohio State University, 1314 Kinnear Road, Columbus, OH 43212-1194 ($8 plus $2 postage and handling). PUB TYPE Books (010) Collected Works General (020) Guides Non-Classroom Use (055) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC07 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Business; Climate; *Ecology; *Environmental Education; *Geography; *Geology; Plants (Botany); Poisons; Resource Materials; *United States History; Water Pollution; Water Quality; *Water Resources; Weather IDENTIFIERS Coastal Management; Fishing Industry; Government Regulation; Great Lakes; *Lake Erie; Shipping Industry ABSTRACT This volume of 16 chapters by 15 contributing authors was conceived as a means of drawing together a body of basic information about the Great Lakes that is up to date, based on sound research, and interpreted by experts in the scientific, historical, environmental and political value of the Great Lakes to North America and the world. Chapters include:(1) "These are the Sweetwater Seas" (Lee Botts);(2) "The Geological Setting of the Great Lakes" (Jane L. Forsyth);(3) "Vegetation and Plant Geography of the Lake Erie Basin" (John J. Furlong);(4) "The Effect of Lake Erie on Climate" (Val L. Eichenlaub);(5) "Coastal Processes on the Great Lakes" (Charles H. Carter);(6) "Early Struggles for Peace on Lake Erie" (Gerard T. Altoff);(7) "Opening the Region to Prosperity" (Gerard T. Altoff); (8) "The History of Great Lakes Shipping" (Alexander C.
    [Show full text]
  • AWIA Small Size and WS RRA Report 05142021.Xlsx
    US EPA data reflect that the following is a list of all community water systems (CWS), serving a population of 3,301 to 49,999, required to certify completion of a risk and resilience assessment (by June 30, 2021) and an emergency response plan (by December 31, 2021) under Section 2013 of America's Water Infrastructure Act (AWIA). EPA uses the population served number that each CWS reported to its respective primacy agency for the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) database as of the date of AWIA’s enactment on October 23, 2018. This list was generated on May 14, 2021. EPA will continue to verify the CWSs that belong on this list. Data will be updated for accuracy on an ongoing basis. PWSID Community Water System Town/City State Zip Code 1 101612109 FORT HALL FORT HALL CA 83203 2 104101247 WARM SPRINGS WATER TREATMENT PLANT WARM SPRINGS OR 97761 3 105300002 LUMMI TRIBAL WATER DISTRICT BELLINGHAM WA 98226 4 105300003 TULALIP BAY WATER DIST #1 TULALIP WA 98271 5 265005620 City of Whitewater Whitewater WI 53190 6 010106001 Mashantucket Pequot Water System MASHANTUCKET CT 06339-3060 7 010109005 Mohegan Tribal Utility Authority Uncasville CT 06382 8 020000005 ST. REGIS MOHAWK TRIBE HOGANSBURG NY 13655 9 020000008 CATTARAUGUS CWS SALAMANCA NY 14779 10 043740039 CHEROKEE WATER SYSTEM CHEROKEE NC 28719 11 055293201 MT. PLEASANT MT. PLEASANT MI 48858 12 055293603 EAST BAY WATER WORKS SUTTONS BAY MI 49682 13 055293611 HANNAHVILLE COMMUNITY WILSON MI 49896-9728 14 055293702 LITTLE RIVER TRIBAL WATER SYSTEM MANISTEE MI 49660 15 055294301 VINELAND ONAMIA MN 56359 16 055294502 PRAIRIE ISLAND WELCH MN 55089 17 055294503 LOWER SIOUX MORTON MN 56270 18 055294506 SIOUX TRAIL PRIOR LAKE MN 55372 19 055295003 SOUTH-CENTRAL WATER SYSTEM BOWLER WI 54416 20 055295310 Giiwedin Hayward WI 54843 21 055295401 LAC DU FLAMBEAU LAC DU FLAMBEAU WI 54538 22 055295508 KESHENA KESHENA WI 54135 23 055295703 ONEIDA #1 OR SITE #1 ONEIDA WI 54155 24 061020808 POTTAWATOMIE CO.
    [Show full text]