DOCSLIB.ORG

Deliverable 2.1 Moving Block Signalling System Test Strategy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Deliverable 2.1 Moving Block Signalling System Test Strategy Ref. Ares(2020)3593391 - 08/07/2020 Deliverable 2.1 Moving Block Signalling System Test Strategy Project acronym: MOVINGRAIL Starting date: 1/12/18 Duration (in months): 25 Call (part) identifier: H2020-S2R-OC-IP2-2018 Grant agreement no: 826347 Due date of deliverable: 01/01/2020 Actual submission date: 29/02/2020 Responsible/Author: Gemma Nicholson (UoB) Dissemination level: PU Status: Issued Reviewed: yes GA 826347 P a g e 1 | 72 Document history Revision Date Description 1 30/09/2019 First draft 2 19/12/19 Second draft / UoB contribution 3 21/02/2020 Final draft incl Park contribution 4 29/02/2020 Final layout and quality check 5 26/06/2020 Revised following comments from S2R officer Report contributors Name Beneficiary Short Name Details of contribution Achila Mazini UoB Introductory and all testing literature review sections, gap analysis Steve Mills UoB Legislation and safety sections Marcelo UoB Stakeholder workshop write-up and Blumenfeld operational concept sections, document discussion Gemma UoB Document content and structure planning, Nicholson discussion, review and revision Bill Redfern PARK Operational concept and testing strategy John Chaddock PARK Operational concept and testing strategy Rob Goverde TUD Quality check and final editing Funding This project has received funding from the Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking (JU) under grant agreement No 826347. The JU receives support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme and the Shift2Rail JU members other than the Union. Disclaimer The information in this document is provided “as is”, and no guarantee or warranty is given that the information is fit for any particular purpose. The content of this document reflects only the author’s view – the Joint Undertaking is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains. The users use the information at their sole risk and liability. GA 826347 P a g e 2 | 72 Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................... 6 Abbreviations and Acronyms ............................................................................................................. 7 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 8 1.1 Scope ...................................................................................................................................... 8 PART A ................................................................................................................................................ 9 2. ETCS Background......................................................................................................................... 9 3. Key stakeholder functional requirements ................................................................................ 11 3.1 On current ETCS testing ....................................................................................................... 11 3.2 On ETCS L3 ........................................................................................................................... 16 PART B .............................................................................................................................................. 20 4. Legislation and regulation for positive control systems ........................................................... 20 4.1 Rail legislation ...................................................................................................................... 20 4.2 Rail regulation ...................................................................................................................... 21 4.3 Other rail regulation ............................................................................................................ 22 5. Safety Management requirements for positive control systems ............................................. 23 5.1 HSE Guidance on Control Systems ...................................................................................... 23 5.2 EU (Rail) Regulation 402/2013 Common Safety Method Risk Assessment ........................ 23 5.3 Aviation and Maritime Safety Management Systems ......................................................... 23 6. Safety approvals for positive control systems in Europe ......................................................... 25 6.1 Rail ....................................................................................................................................... 25 6.2 Aviation ................................................................................................................................ 25 6.3 Automotive .......................................................................................................................... 26 6.4 Maritime .............................................................................................................................. 26 7. Testing Methodologies and Techniques ................................................................................... 27 7.1 Testing methodologies review and the potential of automation across the testing process ............................................................................................................................................. 28 7.1.1 ETCS testing strategy ..................................................................................................... 29 7.1.2 Requirement Analysis and Test Planning ...................................................................... 30 7.1.3 Test environment setup ................................................................................................ 30 7.1.4 Test case preparation .................................................................................................... 31 7.1.5 Test Execution ............................................................................................................... 33 7.1.6 Output evaluation ......................................................................................................... 34 7.1.7 Test closure ................................................................................................................... 35 8. State of the art train control systems ....................................................................................... 36 GA 826347 P a g e 3 | 72 9. Train control system test model and simulation ...................................................................... 38 10. Testing methodologies towards zero on-site testing ............................................................. 42 PART C .............................................................................................................................................. 45 11. Summary of requirements and gap analysis .......................................................................... 45 12. Operational concept for moving block testing ....................................................................... 48 12.1 What is an operational concept? ......................................................................................... 48 12.2 Stakeholders ........................................................................................................................ 48 12.3 Stakeholders role in the testing process ............................................................................. 50 12.4 Purpose of New Testing System .......................................................................................... 50 12.5 Outcomes ............................................................................................................................. 50 12.6 Functional aspects - what the test system does ................................................................. 50 12.7 Test environment................................................................................................................. 52 12.7.1 Phases of Testing ......................................................................................................... 52 12.7.2 Scope for Innovative Test Tools .................................................................................. 52 12.7.3 Scope of Test Bench .................................................................................................... 52 12.7.4 Scope of On-site Testing Tools .................................................................................... 53 13. Moving block testing strategy ................................................................................................. 54 13.1 General ................................................................................................................................ 54 13.1.1 Generic Product and Sub-system Testing ................................................................... 54 13.1.2 Proof-of-Concept Testing of Operational Scenarios using Simulators ....................... 54 13.1.3 Proof-of-Concept Testing of Operational Scenarios on a Test Line ............................ 54 13.1.4 Functional Testing of Sub-systems using Project-specific Configuration Data ........... 55 13.1.5 Project Functional Testing in a Generic Test Laboratory ............................................ 55 13.1.6 Factory Test ................................................................................................................. 56 13.1.7 On-site Testing ...........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ERTMS/ETCS Railway Signalling
    Appendix A ERTMS/ETCS Railway Signalling Salvatore Sabina, Fabio Poli and Nazelie Kassabian A.1 Interoperable Constituents The basic interoperability constituents in the Control-Command and Signalling Sub- systems are, respectively, defined in TableA.1 for the Control-Command and Sig- nalling On-board Subsystem [1] and TableA.2 for the Control-Command and Sig- nalling Trackside Subsystem [1]. The functions of basic interoperability constituents may be combined to form a group. This group is then defined by those functions and by its remaining exter- nal interfaces. If a group is formed in this way, it shall be considered as an inter- operability constituent. TableA.3 lists the groups of interoperability constituents of the Control-Command and Signalling On-board Subsystem [1]. TableA.4 lists the groups of interoperability constituents of the Control-Command and Signalling Trackside Subsystem [1]. S. Sabina (B) Ansaldo STS S.p.A, Via Paolo Mantovani 3-5, 16151 Genova, Italy e-mail: [email protected] F. Poli Ansaldo STS S.p.A, Via Ferrante Imparato 184, 80147 Napoli, Italy e-mail: [email protected] N. Kassabian Ansaldo STS S.p.A, Via Volvera 50, 10045 Piossasco Torino, Italy e-mail: [email protected] © Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018 233 L. Lo Presti and S. Sabina (eds.), GNSS for Rail Transportation,PoliTO Springer Series, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79084-8 234 Appendix A: ERTMS/ETCS Railway Signalling Table A.1 Basic interoperability constituents in the Control-Command
    [Show full text]
  • Heavy Haul Freight Transportation System: Autohaul Autonomous Heavy Haul Freight Train Achieved in Australia
    FEATURED ARTICLES Advanced Railway Systems through Digital Technology Heavy Haul Freight Transportation System: AutoHaul Autonomous Heavy Haul Freight Train Achieved in Australia There are many iron ore rail lines in the Pilbara region, located in North-West Australia. Global mining company Rio Tinto Limited operates a fleet of heavy haul iron ore trains 24 hours a day from its 16 mines to four port terminals overlooking the Indian Ocean. To increase their operational capacity and reduce transportation time, Rio Tinto realized that driverless (GoA4) operation of its trains was the way to achieve this. The company established a framework agreement with Hitachi Rail STS S.p.A. This project was named AutoHaul, and two companies worked closely on its development over several years. Since completing the first loaded run in July 2018, these trains have now safely travelled more than 11 million km autonomously. The network is the world’s first driverless heavy haul long distance train operation. Mazahir Yusuf Anthony MacDonald, Ph.D. Roslyn Stuart Hiroko Miyazaki Tinto’s Operations Center in Perth more than 1,500 km away (see Figure 1 and Figure 2). Th e operation of this 1. Introduction autonomous train is achieved by the heavy haul freight transportation system, AutoHaul*1, developed through co- Rio Tinto Limited, a leading global mining group, operates creation between Rio Tinto and Hitachi Rail STS S.p.A. an autonomous fl eet of 221 heavy haul locomotives along (formerly Ansaldo STS S.p.A.). Th is article presents the its 1,700 km line 24 hours a day extracting iron ore from development history and features of AutoHaul.
    [Show full text]
  • Relative Capacity and Performance of Fixed- and Moving-Block Control
    Research Article Transportation Research Record 1–12 Ó National Academy of Sciences: Relative Capacity and Performance of Transportation Research Board 2019 Article reuse guidelines: sagepub.com/journals-permissions Fixed- and Moving-Block Control DOI: 10.1177/0361198119841852 Systems on North American Freight journals.sagepub.com/home/trr Railway Lines and Shared Passenger Corridors C. Tyler Dick1, Darkhan Mussanov1,2, Leonel E. Evans1, Geordie S. Roscoe1, and Tzu-Yu Chang1 Abstract North American railroads are facing increasing demand for safe, efficient, and reliable freight and passenger transportation. The high cost of constructing additional track infrastructure to increase capacity and improve reliability provides railroads with a strong financial motivation to increase the productivity of their existing mainlines by reducing the headway between trains. The objective of this research is to assess potential for advanced Positive Train Control (PTC) systems with virtual and moving blocks to improve the capacity and performance of Class 1 railroad mainline corridors. Rail Traffic Controller software is used to simulate and compare the delay performance and capacity of train operations on a representative rail cor- ridor under fixed wayside block signals and moving blocks. The experiment also investigates possible interactions between the capacity benefits of moving blocks and traffic volume, traffic composition, and amount of second main track. Moving blocks can increase the capacity of single-track corridors by several trains per day, serving as an effective substitute to con- struction of additional second main track infrastructure in the short term. Moving blocks are shown to have the greatest capacity benefit when the corridor has more second main track and traffic volumes are high.
    [Show full text]
  • Precise and Reliable Localization As a Core of Railway Automation (Rail 4.0)
    Precise and reliable localization as a core of railway automation (Rail 4.0) Michael Hutchinson, Juliette Marais, Emilie Masson, Jaizki Mendizabal, Michael Meyer zu Horste To cite this version: Michael Hutchinson, Juliette Marais, Emilie Masson, Jaizki Mendizabal, Michael Meyer zu Horste. Precise and reliable localization as a core of railway automation (Rail 4.0). 360.revista de alta veloci- dad, 2018, 1 (5), pp149-157. hal-01878793 HAL Id: hal-01878793 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01878793 Submitted on 21 Sep 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 25 número 5 - junio - 2018. Pág 149 - 157 Precise and reliable localization as a core of railway automation (Rail 4.0) Hutchinson, Michael Marais, Juliette Masson, Émilie Mendizabal, Jaizki Meyer zu Hörste, Michael NSL, IFSTTAR, RAILENIUM, CEIT, DLR 1 Abstract: High Speed Railway services have shown that Railways are a competitive and, at the same time, an environmentally friendly transport system. The next level of improvement will be a higher degree of automation, with partial or complete automatic train operation up to fully automatic unattended driverless operation to reduce energy consumption and noise, as well as improving punctuality and comfort.
    [Show full text]
  • Moving Block Signalling 8 Moving Block Signalling and Capacity 8 Virtual Fixed Block Signalling 9
    POSTbrief Number 20, 26 April 2016 Moving Block By Lydia Harriss Signalling Inside: Summary 2 Railway Signalling in the UK 3 The European Rail Traffic Management System 4 Operating at ETCS Levels 2 and 3 7 Moving Block Signalling 8 Moving Block Signalling and Capacity 8 Virtual Fixed Block Signalling 9 www.parliament.uk/post | 020 7219 2840 | [email protected] | @POST_UK Cover image: The ERTMS/ETCS Signalling System, Maurizio POSTbriefs are responsive policy briefings from the Parliamentary Office of Science Palumbo, Railwaysignalling.eu, and Technology based on mini literature reviews and peer review. 2014 2 Moving Block Signalling Summary Network Rail is developing a programme for the national roll-out of the Euro- pean Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS), using European Train Control System (ETCS) Level 2 signalling technology, within 25 years. It is also under- taking work to determine whether ETCS Level 3 technology could be used to speed up the deployment of ERTMS to within 15 years. Implementing ERTMS with ETCS Level 3 has the potential to increase railway route capacity and flexibility, and to reduce both capital and operating costs. It would also make it possible to manage rail traffic using a moving block signal- ling approach. This POSTbrief introduces ERTMS, explains the concept of moving block sig- nalling and discusses the potential benefits for rail capacity, which are likely to vary significantly between routes. Research in this area is conducted by a range of organizations from across in- dustry, academia and Government. Not all of the results of that work are publi- cally available. This briefing draws on information from interviews with experts from academia and industry and a sample of the publically available literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Signal Jamming Attacks Against Communication-Based Train Control: Attack Impact and Countermeasure∗
    Signal Jamming Attacks Against Communication-Based Train Control: Attack Impact and Countermeasure∗ Subhash Lakshminarayana Jabir Shabbir Karachiwala Sang-Yoon Chang Advanced Digital Sciences Center, Advanced Digital Sciences Center, University of Colorado Colorado Illinois at Singapore, Singapore Illinois at Singapore, Singapore Springs [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Girish Revadigar Sristi Lakshmi Sravana Kumar David K.Y. Yau Singapore University of Technology Advanced Digital Sciences Center, Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore Illinois at Singapore, Singapore and Design, Singapore [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Yih-Chun Hu University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign [email protected] ABSTRACT data to provide insights into the jamming attack’s impact and the We study the impact of signal jamming attacks against the com- effectiveness of the proposed countermeasure. munication based train control (CBTC) systems and develop the countermeasures to limit the attacks’ impact. CBTC supports the CCS CONCEPTS train operation automation and moving-block signaling, which im- • Security and privacy → Network security; Mobile and wireless proves the transport efficiency. We consider an attacker jamming security; • Networks → Network protocols; the wireless communication between the trains or the train to way- side access point, which can disable CBTC and the corresponding KEYWORDS benefits. In contrast to prior work studying jamming only atthe Communication-based train control, signal jamming attack, fre- physical or link layer, we study the real impact of such attacks on quency hopping spread spectrum, attack impact end users, namely train journey time and passenger congestion.
    [Show full text]
  • D5.1 Moving Block System Requirements
    X2Rail-1 Project Title: Start-up activities for Advanced Signalling and Automation Systems Starting date: 01/09/2016 Duration in months: 36 Call (part) identifier: H2020-S2RJU-CFM-2015-01-1 Grant agreement no: 730640 Deliverable D5.1 Moving Block System Specification Due date of deliverable Month 32 Actual submission date 19-07-2019 Organisation name of lead contractor for this deliverable SIE Dissemination level PU Revision Third Release X2Rail-1 Deliverable D5.1 Moving Block System Specification Authors Author(s) Siemens (SIE) Contributor(s) Hitachi Rail STS (STS) Bombardier (BTSE) Thales (TTS) Network Rail (NR) Alstom (ALS) CAF (CAF) Trafikverket (TRV) AZD (AZD) Mermec (MERMEC) Deutsche Bahn (DB) SNCF (SNCF) ERTMS Users Group (EUG) Page 2 of 126 X2Rail-1 Deliverable D5.1 Moving Block System Specification Change History Version Date Release Status Notes 1.0 18/04/2019 First Release First Release for review by TMT 2.0 05/07/2019 Second Release Final Version 3.0 31/10/2019 Third Release After JU Expert Review Page 3 of 126 X2Rail-1 Deliverable D5.1 Moving Block System Specification Executive Summary This System Specification is one of a group of documents produced by WP5 Moving Block in the Shift2Rail project X2Rail-1, in accordance with the X2Rail-1 Grant Agreement: ▪ D5.1 Moving Block System Specification (this document) which defines the System Requirements for ETCS Level 3 Moving Block ▪ D5.2 Moving Block Operational and Engineering Rules which defines additional Operational and Engineering Rules required for an ETCS Level 3 Moving Block system ▪ D5.3 Moving Block Preliminary Safety Analysis which describes hazards identified as a result of operating an ETCS Level 3 Moving Block system, and also describes the mitigation of those hazards ▪ D5.4 Moving Block Application Analysis which describes the application of ETCS L3 Moving Block systems to different railway types.
    [Show full text]
  • SUBSET-023 Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations Page 1/27 3.1.0
    ERA * UNISIG * EEIG ERTMS USERS GROUP ERTMS/ETCS Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations REF : SUBSET-023 ISSUE : 3.1.0 DATE : 12/05/2014 SUBSET-023 Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations Page 1/27 3.1.0 ERA * UNISIG * EEIG ERTMS USERS GROUP 1. MODIFICATION HISTORY Issue Number Section number Modification / Description Author Date 0.0.1 All First issue. Sven Adomeit Hans Kast Jean-Christophe Laffineur 0.0.2 All Reuse of EEIG glossary Sven Adomeit Hans Kast Jean-Christophe Laffineur 0.0.3 All Review of SRS; Sven Adomeit New SRS Chapter 0.0.4. All Updating references Sven Adomeit Add: RAP:RMP:MAR: Mode Profile 0.0.5. All Updating for Class 1 SRS WLH Feb 2000 Version 2 0.1.0. All Updating following UNISIG review WLH and comments from Adt ,Alst. March 2000 0.2.0. All Further comments from Alstom WLH March 2000 2.0.0 Final issue to ECSAG U.D. (ed) 30 March 2000 2.9.1 All Revised edition for baseline 3 B. Stamm 08 February S. Adomeit 2012 A. Hougardy 2.9.2 All As per UNISIG review comments A. Hougardy 01 March 2012 Add new entries ACK, KER and LUC Refine definition of Train Interface SUBSET-023 Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations Page 2/27 3.1.0 ERA * UNISIG * EEIG ERTMS USERS GROUP Unit 3.0.0 Baseline 3 release version A. Hougardy 02 March 2012 3.0.1 CR 1124 O. Gemine 04 April 2014 3.0.2 Baseline 3 1st maintenance pre- O. Gemine release version 23 April 2014 3.0.3 CR 1223 O.
    [Show full text]
  • Application of Communication Based Moving Block Systems on Existing Metro Lines
    Computers in Railways X 391 Application of communication based Moving Block systems on existing metro lines L. Lindqvist1 & R. Jadhav2 1Centre of Excellence, Bombardier Transportation, Spain 2Sales, Bombardier Transportation, USA Abstract The unique features of Communication Based Train Control (CBTC) systems with Moving Block (MB) capability makes them uniquely suited for application ‘on top’ of existing Mass Transit or Metro systems, permitting a capacity increase in these systems. This paper defines and describes the features of modern CBTC Moving Block systems such as the Bombardier* CITYFLO* 450 or CITYFLO 650 solutions that make them suited for ‘overlay’ application ‘on top’ of the existing systems and gives an example of such an application in a main European Metro. Note: *Trademark (s) of Bombardier Inc. or its subsidiaries. Keywords: CBTC, Moving Block, CITYFLO, TRS, Movement Authority, norming point, headway. 1 Introduction The use of radio as a method of communication between the train and wayside in Mass Transit systems, instead of the traditional track circuits/axle counters and loops is gaining popularity. The radio based CBTC systems are uniquely suited for application ‘on top’ of existing Mass Transit or Metro systems for increased traffic capacity as CBTC systems normally do not interfere with the existing systems. This allows an installation of the CBTC system in a line in operation whilst maintaining full safety and capacity during the process. The fact that CBTC systems also allow Moving Block operation adds to the
    [Show full text]
  • Efficient Driving of CBTC ATO Operated Trains
    DOCTORAL THESIS MADRID, SPAIN 2017 Efficient driving of CBTC ATO operated trains William Carvajal Carreño ESCUELA TÉCNICA SUPERIOR DE INGENIERÍA Efficient driving of CBTC ATO operated trains William Carvajal Carreño Doctoral Thesis supervisors: Senior Assoc.prof. Asunción Paloma Cucala García Universidad Pontificia Comillas Senior Assoc.prof. Antonio Fernández-Cardador Universidad Pontificia Comillas Members of the Examination Committee: Prof. Masafumi Miyatake Sophia University, Chairman Prof. Aurelio García Cerrada Universidad Pontificia Comillas, Examiner Prof. Stefan Östlund Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan, Examiner Assoc.prof. Rob Goverde Technische Universiteit Delft, Examiner Prof. Emilio Olías Ruíz Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Examiner Senior Assoc.prof. Rafael Palacios Hielscher Universidad Pontificia Comillas, Opponent TRITA-EE 2016:201 ISSN 1653-5146 ISBN 978-84-617-7523-1 Copyright © William Carvajal-Carreño, 2017 Printed by US-AB This doctoral research was funded by the European Commission through the Erasmus Mundus Joint Doctorate Program and also partially supported by the Institute for Research in Technology at Universidad Pontificia Comillas. Efficient driving of CBTC ATO operated trains PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Technische Universiteit Delft, op gezag van de Rector Magnificus prof. ir. K.C.A.M. Luyben, voorzitter van het College voor Promoties, in het openbaar te verdedigen op dinsdag 7 Maart 2017 om 12:00 uur door William CARVAJAL-CARREÑO Master in Electrical Engineering Universidad Industrial de Santander, Colombia geboren te Bucaramanga, Colombia This dissertation has been approved by the promotors: Prof. dr. ir. M.P.C. Weijnen and Senior Assoc.prof. A. P. Cucala García Composition of the doctoral committee: Prof. M. Miyatake Sophia University, Japan, Chairman Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Dottorato Di Ricerca in Informatica, Sistemi E Telecomunicazioni
    DOTTORATO DI RICERCA IN INFORMATICA, SISTEMI E TELECOMUNICAZIONI TELEMATICA E SOCIETA' DELL'INFORMAZIONE CICLO XXVIII COORDINATORE Prof. Nesi Paolo Automatic Train Operation System for light rail and metro using a model-driven approach and Social Network Monitoring to quantify public attention on services and events Settore Scientifico Disciplinare ING-INF/05 Dottorando Tutori Dott. Menabeni Simone Prof. Nesi Paolo _______________________________ _________________________ (firma) (firma) Prof. Fantechi Alessandro _________________________ (firma) Coordinatore Prof. Chisci Luigi _______________________________ (firma) Anni 2012/2015 Table of contents Preface ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Part 1........................................................................................................................................... 8 1 Introduction to Railway Signalling Systems ........................................................................ 8 1.1 Railway Signalling Systems technology........................................................................ 8 1.1.1 ERTMS/ETCS standard ........................................................................................ 11 1.1.2 Braking Model and Speed Profiles ..................................................................... 15 1.2 CBTC Overview ........................................................................................................... 16 1.2.1 Domain
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Capacity Limitations and Suitability of the European Traffic Management System to Support Automatic Train Operation on Main Line Applications
    Computers in Railways XI 193 Evaluation of the capacity limitations and suitability of the European Traffic Management System to support Automatic Train Operation on Main Line Applications P. Thomas1, D. Fisher1 & F. Sheikh2 1Parsons Group International Ltd, UK 2Department for Transport, UK Abstract The European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS) is the concept by which Europe is moving towards the standardisation of its rail signal control systems. Standardisation focuses on interfaces necessary for interoperability between trainborne and trackside equipment. ERTMS represents a step change for many railways’, the vast majority of which are signalled with colour light signals and basic warning systems. ERTMS is specified in a number of different levels, and dependant on the implementation can introduce the benefits of cab- signalling, automatic train protection and future moving block train separation. This paper examines the capabilities and limitations of an ETCS/ERTMS level 2 implementation as specified by the current Technical Specifications for Interoperability for use in high density network locations and the suitability of ETCS/ERTMS to support the integration of an Automatic Train Operation (ATO) overlay. A generic sample section has been developed to analyse the headway constraints within the current ERTMS solution. The conclusions from the study suggest that there are no fundamental constraints preventing a level 2 implementation supporting an operational headway of 24 Trains Per Hour with recovery margin. The use of ATO for a high density application will offer an improved headway performance but will require a level of development and enhancement to the ERTMS functionality and architecture to correctly implement some ATO functionality.
    [Show full text]