DOCSLIB.ORG

Idolatry in the Theology of Karl Barth

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Idolatry in the Theology of Karl Barth IDOLATRY IN THE THEOLOGY OF KARL BARTH William J. Brennan III A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 2016 Full metadata for this item is available in St Andrews Research Repository at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/9029 This item is protected by original copyright This item is licensed under a Creative Commons Licence Idolatry in the Theology of Karl Barth William J. Brennan III This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment for the degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 14 March 2016 1. Candidate’s declarations: I, William J Brennan III, hereby certify that this thesis, which is approximately 80,000 words in length, has been written by me, and that it is the record of work carried out by me, or principally by myself in collaboration with others as acknowledged, and that it has not been submitted in any previous application for a higher degree. I was admitted as a research student to the University of Aberdeen in September 2012, and to the University of St Andrews in September 2013, and as a candidate for the degree of PhD in September, 2013; the higher study for which this is a record was carried out in the University of Aberdeen between 2012 and 2013 and in the University of St Andrews between 2013 and 2016. Date …… signature of candidate ……… 2. Supervisor’s declaration: I hereby certify that the candidate has fulfilled the conditions of the Resolution and Regulations appropriate for the degree of PhD in the University of St Andrews and that the candidate is qualified to submit this thesis in application for that degree. Date …… signature of supervisor ……… 3. Permission for publication: (to be signed by both candidate and supervisor) In submitting this thesis to the University of St Andrews I understand that I am giving permission for it to be made available for use in accordance with the regulations of the University Library for the time being in force, subject to any copyright vested in the work not being affected thereby. I also understand that the title and the abstract will be published, and that a copy of the work may be made and supplied to any bona fide library or research worker, that my thesis will be electronically accessible for personal or research use unless exempt by award of an embargo as requested below, and that the library has the right to migrate my thesis into new electronic forms as required to ensure continued access to the thesis. I have obtained any third-party copyright permissions that may be required in order to allow such access and migration, or have requested the appropriate embargo below. The following is an agreed request by candidate and supervisor regarding the publication of this thesis: PRINTED COPY a) No embargo on print copy ELECTRONIC COPY a) No embargo on electronic copy Date: ……. Signature of candidate:………….. Date:…….. Signature of supervisor:…………. Abstract This dissertation analyses and critically evaluates an aspect of Karl Barth’s thought, the understanding of which is important to a broader understanding of Barth, his relationship to other (especially iconoclastic) thinkers, and his relevance for contemporary theology: his understanding and critique of idolatry and the idol. Chapter 2 argues that it was revelation which both drove Barth’s idolatry-critique and determined his concepts of idolatry and the idol. It analyses Bath’s idolatry-critique as it was levelled against natural theology, and offers an evaluation of the picture of Barth’s thought which emerges. Chapter 3 analyses Barth’s idolatry-critique in relation to the doctrine of God. Directives which, for Barth, had to be adhered to within the development of the doctrine of God for the avoidance of idolatry, are discussed. Finally, an evaluation and critique of Barth’s critique of idolatry within the doctrine of God, and of his own adherence to these directives, is offered. Chapter 4 analyses the relationship of Barth’s idolatry-critique to his discussion of religion. It is shown that Barth, in his mature thought, criticised both the essence of religion and certain theological uses of the concept of religion as idolatry. Barth’s critique of religion as idolatry is itself subjected to critique, and the question of what bearing his critique of religion as idolatry ought to have for Christian, theological engagement with adherents of other world religions is taken up. Chapter 5 summarises and discusses further some of the findings and implications of this study. It is suggested that Barth’s thoroughly christological critique of idolatry (which is not without its own problems), in that it stands in contrast to the less particularistic forms of idolatry-critique set forth by several other modern scholars, raises the question of whether an idolatry-critique like his own might be called for within contemporary theology. For Isabel, Liam, and Scotland Acknowledgements There are many people to whom (and for whom) I must give thanks: to my fellow PhD students at the universities of Aberdeen and St Andrews, who in both formal and informal settings have helped me to think through the topics about which I’ve written; to Professor Tom Greggs, who helped to supervise my doctoral studies during their pivotal first year, and who first taught me to use a French press; to my viva committee, made up of Professors Mark Elliott and David Clough, for whose kindness and eagerness to help me grow as a scholar I am grateful, and whose questions, comments, and critiques were very valuable; to my Doktorvater, Professor John Webster, who guided me throughout the process of writing this dissertation. My viva and the lead-up to it was overshadowed by his untimely death, and I will forever be grateful for the time I had with him. The greatness of his intellectual powers was matched only by that of his Christian character: his humility, his patience, his kindness, and so on. He is deeply missed. To the people who made up my church family in Aberdeen, Scotland during the early stages of writing my dissertation, and who will always be my friends; to the people of First Congregational Church in Crawford, NE, where I was pastor during the final stages of writing this dissertation. Their love, patience and prayers for me during this time has meant a tremendous amount to me. To Scott Ludlow, who in the latter stages of my writing of this dissertation prayed for me and encouraged me as someone who had ‘been there before’; to Alvin and Barbara Brown, whose love and support never wavered; to Derick Jenkins whose friendship over the years, including during the writing of this dissertation, has meant more to me than I can express; to my mother and father, Bill and Delanie Brennan, who from the earliest years of my life, taught me Scripture, loved me and encouraged me in whatever I pursued; to my four sisters, Millicent, Molly, Amelia and Maya, and my brother Tucker, for whose love and prayers I am deeply grateful; To my son Liam, and my daughter Scotland, who patiently endured even times when I was working and writing from morning till night, and who have been two of the greatest sources of joy in my life during the time of writing this dissertation; and above all to my wife, Isabel, who several years ago uprooted and moved with me to a strange, new world within Scotland, and whose love and support has caused me to press on and has been a comfort to me and a great cause for giving thanks to God always. I have been working toward this goal throughout the entirety of our marriage and now having, by God’s grace, obtained it, there’s no one I’d rather celebrate it with. Contents Abbreviations ..................................................................................................................... ix Chapter 1: Idolatry in the Theology of Karl Barth .............................................................. 1 1.1 The Value of Considering ‘Idolatry in the Theology of Karl Barth’..................... 1 1.2 The Aim and Plan of the Present Work ................................................................. 4 1.3 The State of the Question ...................................................................................... 7 Chapter 2: Idolatry and the Knowledge of God ................................................................ 15 2.1 Revelation and Idolatry ....................................................................................... 15 2.1.1 Revelation and idolatry in Barth in and after Romans II .......................... 16 2.1.2 Changes in Barth’s doctrine of revelation and his critique of idolatry ..... 37 2.2 Idolatry and Natural Theology ............................................................................ 48 2.2.1 What Barth meant by ‘natural theology’ .................................................. 48 2.2.2 The formal relationship between revelation, natural theology and idolatry .................................................................................................... 52 2.2.3 Four early turns in Barth’s idolatry-critique as related to natural theology .................................................................................................... 54 2.2.4 Further aspects of Barth’s mature idolatry-critique in relation to natural theology .................................................................................................... 72 2.2.5 The consistency of Barth’s rejection of natural theology as idolatry ....... 76 2.3 Critique ...............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Research Note James Luther Adams Bibliographies
    Research Note James Luther Adams Bibliographies JARED A. FARLEY James Luther Adams (1901-1994) is widely considered the twentieth century’s leading Unitarian theologian. Serving as professor of theology and ethics at Meadville Lombard Theological School and the Federated Theological Faculty in Chicago, IL (1936-1957), and at Harvard Divinity School in Cambridge, MA (1957-1968), Adams authored innumerable sermons, essays and book chapters. Among scholars, he is known for having translated the works of Paul Tillich and Ernst Troeltsch into English. Among students of ministry, he is recognized for his arguments concerning the religious efficacy of voluntary associations, derived from his experiences confronting Nazism in pre-World War II Germany. An intellectual with an uncanny ability to recall information and see connections across diverse subjects, Adams drew deeply from the well of theological, historical, and social concern that was his life. His writings preserve much of what he came to believe. The following two bibliographies came about as a helpful by- product of my research on James Luther Adams. These titles list and cross-reference the sermons, essays and addresses of JLA that have been reprinted in the various edited volumes of his writings, including the recently published Prophet to the Powerful (2008). They go beyond the scope of the bibliography that appears at the conclusion of Adams’ Not Without Dust And Heat (1995), and may prove advantageous, particularly as they are organized here, for the many theology students, ministers, 91 92 James Luther Adams Bibliographies / FARLEY and scholars who often turn to these collected works to become familiar with Adams’ life and work.
    [Show full text]
  • Theological Criticism of the Bible
    Currents FOCUS Reformation Heritage and the Question of Sachkritik: Theological Criticism of the Bible Paul E. Capetz Professor of Historical Theology United Theological Seminary of the Twin Cities New Brighton, Minnesota new era in Protestant theology was inaugurated with the publication of Karl Barth’s ground-breaking commentary ince Bultmann was a Lutheran on Paul’s Epistle to the Romans (1919, 1922).1 This his- Atorical judgment is in keeping with the impact that Barth himself Swhereas Barth was a Calvinist, their hoped the book would have on his contemporaries. Negatively, debate in the matter of Sachkritik can he intended it to signal a break with the regnant historical-critical method of biblical exegesis (“historicism”) that had characterized be viewed as a modern reprise of the liberal Protestant theology in the nineteenth century. Positively, he aspired to recover the sort of “theological exegesis” of Scrip- earlier difference between Luther and ture exemplified by Luther and Calvin in the sixteenth century. Calvin. Distinctively twentieth-century Protestant theology thus began with Barth’s critique of one approach to biblical exegesis coupled with his call for retrieval of another approach. Both critique and mann perceived an inconsistency in Barth’s practice, since Barth retrieval stood in the service of his overriding concern to make had opened the door to Sachkritik in his Romans commentary the Bible central again to the preaching and theology of his own (even if he himself refused to walk through it, a point to which day much as it had been to that of the Reformers. Bultmann drew attention in his review).
    [Show full text]
  • Download Original 7.82 MB
    WELLESLEY COLLEGE BULLETIN ANNUAL REPORTS PRESIDENT AND TREASURER ^^ 191 6= J 8 WELLESLEY, MASSACHUSETTS DECEMBER, I9I8 PUBLISHED BY THE COLLEGE IN JANUARY, MAY, JUNE, NOVEMBER, DECEMBER Entered as second-class matter December 20, 1911, at the post-office at Wellesley. Massachusetts, under Act of Congress of July 16, 1894. SERIES 7 NUMBER 6 WELLESLEY COLLEGE ANNUAL EEPOKTS PBESIDENT AND TREASURER 1916-1918 PRESIDENT'S ANNUAL REPORT To the Board of Trustees of Wellesley College:— I have the honor to present in one the report of the two years from July 1, 1916, to June 30, 1918. Heretofore the annual reports of the President and Treasurer due June 30 have been published in the following March. It was decided to publish these hereafter in December. To avoid publishing two reports in the 1918 series, the report for 1916-17 was de- layed, and is here combined with that for 1917-18. The sup- plementary reports of the Dean, the Librarian, and the Chair- man of the Committee on Graduate Instruction will also cover two years. These two years have brought many losses to the College. On February 12, 1917, Pauline Adeline Durant, the widow of the founder of the College, died at her home in Wellesley. Mrs. Durant gave the heartiest co-operation to Mr. Durant's plan for founding the College, and throughout his life assisted him in every way. After his death in October, 1881, she accepted the care of the College as a sacred trust from her husband, and gave to it thought, time, and money. Mrs. Durant had been an invalid confined to her home for more than three years before her death, but until these later years no meeting of the Board of Trustees nor any college function was complete without her presence.
    [Show full text]
  • Twentieth Century (Mainly) Protestant Theologies (EMT 3542 / 6542) Fall 2017 / Thursdays, 2:00-4:00 Thomas E
    Twentieth Century (mainly) Protestant Theologies (EMT 3542 / 6542) Fall 2017 / Thursdays, 2:00-4:00 Thomas E. Reynolds [email protected] / (416) 585–4544 DRAFT – a final copy will be distributed on the first day of class Description: This course explores key figures and movements in 20th century (mainly) Protestant Theologies. The scope of investigation broadly includes liberal, neo-orthodox, political/liberation, feminist/womanist/mujerista, postliberal, postmodern, and theologies of religions. Attention will be given to representative authors and related movements. Educational methods used include lectures, discussions, presentations, and a research paper. Required Texts Most of the required reading for the course is taken from the following books, available for purchase at Crux Books, Wycliffe College or online through other distributers, or available on reserve at the Emmanuel Library: -Core Text James. C. Livingston, et. al., Modern Christian Thought, Vol II: The Twentieth Century, 2nd ed. (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2006). -Primary Texts Karl Barth, Evangelical Theology: An Introduction (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 1992) Dietrich Bonhoeffer, A Testament to Freedom: Essential Writings of Dietrich Bonhoeffer (New York: Harper One, 1995) Ada Maria Isasi-Diaz, Mujerista Theology: A Theology for the Twenty-First Century (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 1996) Paul Tillich, ed. F. Forrester Church, The Essential Tillich (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1999) Other required and recommended reading will be available on reserve in the Emmanuel College library or distributed online via the Portal. Recommended Texts Gregory Baum, ed., The Twentieth Century: A Theological Overview (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 1999) David Ford and Rachel Muers, eds., The Modern Theologians: An Introduction to Christian Theology Since 1918, 3rd ed.
    [Show full text]
  • James Luther Adams Prophet to the Powerful
    James Luther Adams Prophet to the Powerful James Luther Adams Prophet to the Powerful Edited by Herbert F. Vetter Cover Portrait of James Luther Adams Paul Hertz, 1975, Some Rights Reserved. Photographer: Jon Chase Photo Harvard Square Library, Cambridge James Luther Adams: Prophet to the Powerful This book is not copyrighted and is placed in the public domain by Harvard Square Library 2008, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02140. Published by Harvard Square Library www.harvardsquarelibrary.org ISBN: 978-0-615-25994-9 Contents I. The Life of James Luther Adams 3 Taking Time Seriously 5 James Luther Adams A Biographical and Intellectual Sketch * 15 Max L. Stackhouse Harvard Faculty Memorial Minute 43 George Kimmich Beach A Celebration of Life 49 Max L. Stackhouse II. James Luther Adams at 75* 55 Introduction by the Editor 57 The Evolution of My Social Concern 64 James Luther Adams III. James Luther Adams Papers: Six Decades * 79 1. Pessimism and Optimism in Religion 81 2. Christianity and Humanism 91 3. The Stabilizer and the Shatterer 109 4. The Liberal Christian Looks at Himself 113 5. Festschrift: Presentation to Paul Tillich 130 6. The Body and the Soul of Learning 134 IV. James Luther Adams Papers** 141 Introduction by the Editor 143 Papers 1. Our Enemy: Angelism 147 2. Religion’s Word Against Religion 154 3. The War of the Gods 156 4. Betraying the World with a Kiss 162 5. Perspectives on the Pluralistic Society 169 6. The Wrath and Love of God 176 7. The Creative Thrust of Conflict 178 8. By Their Groups Shall Ye Know Them 186 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Rerum Novarum (1893) Pius XI, Quadragesimo Anno (1931) John XXIII, Mater Et Magistra (1961) John Paul II, Centesimus Annus (1991)
    Religion and Politics After the Enlightenment GOVT-788-01 Spring 2008 Georgetown University Wednesday 12:15PM - 02:45PM Berkley Center Conference Room, 3307 M Street, Suite 200 Instructor Michael Kessler, [email protected] Course Description Recent generations have witnessed a reawakening of potent, even vehement, forms of political theologies. Across the globe, vigorous political expression of impassioned belief has emerged within contemporary political orders. Even when political theologies do not turn to physical violence, recent advocates have espoused taking control of the political order for religiously-motivated goals, using a vast arsenal of legal, cultural, and electoral means. This surge of political religion comes at a time when forces of urbanization, globalization, and advances in knowledge and technology have spread, forces that were supposed to quell religious piety and make faith increasingly benign, according to many academics and secular theorists. Religion has not become a domesticated sphere, separated from politics and other sectors of human society. Countering the so-called secularization thesis, God’s followers have not receded quietly and they increasingly assert their role in the political order. This persistence of political theologies poses many important issues: How do religions legitimate their political activity? How do religions, newly conscious of history, time, and material reality, shape their political activity? How do they grapple with modern demands of reason and the principles of liberal democracy in formulating their political agenda? How can liberal democratic political communities, shaped by enlightenment ideals, accommodate—or cabin—political theologies? As religious thinkers in the West grappled with the meaning of modernity and how religious belief and practice could properly, if at all, enter into the public sphere, they came to a new understanding of the limits of power politics and the role of religion in shaping the collective order.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    BIBLIOGRAPHY Abbott, Edwin A., The Kernel and the Husk: Letters on Spiritual Christianity, by the Author of “Philochristus” and “Onesimus”, London: Macmillan, 1886. Adams, Dickenson W. (ed.), The Papers of Thomas Jefferson (Second Series): Jefferson’s Extracts from the Gospels, Ruth W. Lester (Assistant ed.), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1983. Addis, Cameron, Jefferson’s Vision for Education, 1760–1845, New York: Peter Lang, 2003. Adorno, Theodore W., and Max Horkheimer, Dialectic of Enlightenment, John Cumming (trans.), London: Allen Lane, 1973. Agrippa, Heinrich Cornelius, The Vanity of the Arts and Sciences, London: Printed by R. E. for R. B. and Are to Be Sold by C. Blount, 1684. Albertan-Coppola, Sylviane, ‘Apologetics’, in Catherine Porter (trans.), Alan Charles Kors (ed.), The Encyclopedia of the Enlightenment (vol. 1 of 4), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001, pp. 58–63. Alexander, Gerhard (ed.), Apologie oder Schutzschrift für die vernünfti- gen Verehrer Gottes/Hermann Samuel Reimarus (2 vols.), im Auftrag der Joachim-Jungius-Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften in Hamburg, Frankfurt: Insel, 1972. ———, Auktionskatalog der Bibliothek von Hermann Samuel Reimarus: alphabe- tisches Register, Hamburg: Joachim-Jungius-Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften, 1980. Alexander, H. G. (ed.), The Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence: Together with Extracts from Newton’s “Principia” and “Opticks”, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1956. © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2019 375 J. C. P. Birch, Jesus in an Age of Enlightenment, Christianities in the Trans-Atlantic World, https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51276-5 376 BIBLIOGRAPHY Allegro, John M., The Sacred Mushroom and the Cross: A Study of the Nature and Origins of Christianity Within the Fertility Cults of the Ancient Near East, London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1970.
    [Show full text]
  • Unitarian Universalist Theology Renaissance Module ONLINE
    Unitarian Universalist Theology Renaissance Module ONLINE VERSION PARTICIPANT GUIDE By Lynn Ungar and Sara Lewis © 2018 by the Faith Development Office of the UUA, Boston, MA Table of Contents About the Authors; Acknowledgement 3 Overview of Sessions 4 Introduction to the Module 6 Pre-Module Assignments 16 Session 1: What Is Theology? 17 Session 2: Early Unitarianism and Universalism 34 Session 3: Expanding Beyond Christian Roots 40 Session 4: More 20th Century Influences 48 Session 5: 21st Century UU Theology 55 Session 6: Closing Session 59 UU Theology Renaissance Module, ONLINE Participant Guide 2 About the Authors Rev. Dr. Lynn Ungar holds an M.Div. from Starr King School for the Ministry and a D. Min. in religious education from McCormick Theological seminary. She has served as a parish minister in Moscow, Idaho and in Chicago, and as a director of religious education in Fremont and Hayward, California. She currently serves as minister for lifespan learning for the Church of the Larger Fellowship, our online UU congregation (www.questformeaning.org and www.clfuu.org ). Lynn is co-author of the Tapestry of Faith curricula Faithful Journeys and Love Connects Us and author of Sing to the Power. Lynn’s poetry can be found in a variety of publications, including her latest book Bread and Other Miracles. She is the composer of the round, “Come, Come, Whoever You Are,” Hymn 188 in Singing the Living Tradition. Sara Lewis, unchurched in her early years, found Unitarian Universalism in her teen years and has served as Director of Religious Education at the Olympia Unitarian Universalist Congregation in Olympia, Washington since 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • The Five Smooth Stones of Unitarianism: the Basics of Liberal Religion Part Three
    The Five Smooth Stones of Unitarianism: The Basics of Liberal Religion Part Three Yakima Unitarian Universalist Church Yakima, WA September 27, 2020, Zoom Andrew D. Whitmont, PhD (Call to worship: words of Galen Guengerich, UU Minister in NYC.) “It’s my view that many people today have rightly recognized that established religions don’t have all the answers, that some of the answers they offer don’t make sense in our world today, and that some of the answers are downright destructive and offensive. But the rise of interest in spirituality indicates that the longing for a comprehensive sense of meaning and a deep sense of purpose, a longing historically satisfied by religion, remains unmet by secularism” Introductory song: “Spirit of Life”, lighting of chalice, joys and sorrows, etc. Good morning, everyone. Thanks for coming today. In this talk we I will seek to advance our understanding of the work of Unitarian Universalist theologian James Luther Adams and his “Five Smooth Stones” of liberal religion. Adams, you may recall, was born in 1901, raised in Ritzville, WA, educated at Harvard Divinity School and lived until 1994. He is known as the leading theologian of Unitarian Universalism in light of his clarification of the nature of liberal religion. It’s important to keep in mind that Adams’ work is about religion, an institutionalized social organization dealing with the relation between humans and The Mystery, also called God, Deity, Divinity, etc. Many of you may consider your self atheists, adeists, humanists, or non-believers and might find the explicitly metaphysical and spiritual approach of religion to be off-putting.
    [Show full text]
  • John M. Weatherwax Collection SPC.2015.005
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c86h4nx1 No online items Inventory of the John M. Weatherwax Collection SPC.2015.005 Karen Clemons California State University Dominguez Hills, Gerth Archives and Special Collections 2021-04-22 University Library South -5039 (Fifth Floor) 1000 E. Victoria St. Carson, CA 90747 [email protected] URL: https://www.csudh.edu/libarchives/ Inventory of the John M. SPC.2015.005 1 Weatherwax Collection SPC.2015.005 Contributing Institution: California State University Dominguez Hills, Gerth Archives and Special Collections Title: John M. Weatherwax Collection Creator: Weatherwax, John M. (John Martin), 1900-1984 source: National Committee to Secure Justice in the Rosenberg Case source: Los Angeles Committee to Secure Justice in the Rosenberg Case source: National Federation for Constitutional Liberties source: American Committee for Protection of Foreign Born source: Los Angeles Committee for Protection of Foreign Born source: Crane-Gartz, Kate source: Weatherwax, Clara , 1905-1958 Identifier/Call Number: SPC.2015.005 Physical Description: 33 boxes Physical Description: 14.6 Linear Feet Date (inclusive): 1913-1981; undated Date (bulk): 1930-1960 Abstract: This collection contains material collected and written by John M. Weatherwax such as correspondence, manuscripts, essays, film treatments, research notes, pamphlets, leaflets, flyers, programs, mailers, and other documents. Material authored by Weatherwax includes drafts of manuscripts, essays, novellas, articles, radio transcripts, and film treatments; as well as notes, revisions, and related research material. Collected material is from organizations such as American Committee for Protection of Foreign Born, National Federation for Constitutional Liberties, Los Angeles Committee to Secure Justice for the Rosenbergs, Alameda County Labor Party, Communist Party of Los Angeles, Socialist Labor Party, and other organizations, groups, and publications focused on sociopolitical issues.
    [Show full text]
  • The Self in Contemporary Liberal Religion: a Constructive Critique Paul B
    The Self in Contemporary Liberal Religion: A Constructive Critique Paul B. Rasor One of the most enduring legacies of the Enlightenment is its highly individualistic view of the human self. This view of the self became a central characteristic of the liberal-modern worldview, and it quickly found its way into the religious liberalism that emerged in the wake of the Enlightenment. Yet today, this individualistic understanding of the self is increasingly untenable. Philosophers, social scientists, psychologists, linguists, and theologians now generally agree that our liberal understanding of ourselves as autonomous individuals is an illusion. We don't first exist as individuals who then form social groups. Instead, the group always comes first, and the individual is formed by and always exists in relation to a larger social context. We are social beings through and through. Yet despite widespread contemporary agreement that the human self is fundamentally intersubjective or social in nature, a strong and potentially destructive emphasis on individualism continues to dominate the self- understanding of many religious liberals, including those within the Unitarian Universalist tradition. I believe we religious liberals need to get over ourselves. We need a more suitable understanding of the self as social, and in this article, I want to suggest an approach toward constructing such a conception. I begin by tracing the philosophy of subjectivity that emerged in the Enlightenment and that became the basis for the liberal-modern understanding of the self. I also sketch the more recent developments that began to undermine this view (part I). I then describe the individualistic self-understanding I believe to be prominent and problematic among religious liberals today (part II).
    [Show full text]
  • Total of 10 Pages Only May Be Xeroxed
    CENTRE FOR NEWFOUNDLAND STUDIES TOTAL OF 10 PAGES ONLY MAY BE XEROXED (Without Author's Permission) JOHN 1: 14a AND RUDOLF BULTMANN'S HERMENEUTICAL METHOD by Timothy Labron A thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in partial fidfi1ment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Religious Studies Memorial University of Newfoundland 1998 St. John's Newfoundland ABSTRACT "Kcx\ 6 A.6yo<; oup~ eyeve'to"-'~and the Word became flesh'~ (John l:l4a)­ -is a key verse in the thoughtofRudolfBultmann His interpretation ofthis verse is, in fact, paradigmatic for understanding his whole hermeneutical method Yet the conventional understanding ofhis interpretation of l: l4a and, consequendy, his hermeneutical metho~ is beset with misunderstandings. The difficulty of understanding Bultmann' s hermeneutical method results from placing it in a Cartesian context, which seeks a clear and objective interpretation. Bultmann' s thought, however, resists such Cartesian contextualization. A post-structural context, which similarly rejects Cartesianism, is better suited as a context for understanding Bultmann' s thought It is imperative, however, that John l:l4a and the theological principle of justification by faith be shown as the core of his thought, rather than reducing his hermeneutical method to a philosophy. By the juxtaposition of a post-structmal context, John l:l4a, and justification by faith, a renewed and more fruitful discussion of Bultmann and his hermeneutical method may follow. u ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank Dr. David I. Hawkin for his positive critici~ and the School of Graduate Studies for providing financial assistance. w TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT .........................
    [Show full text]