The Five Smooth Stones of Unitarianism: the Basics of Liberal Religion Part Three

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Five Smooth Stones of Unitarianism: the Basics of Liberal Religion Part Three The Five Smooth Stones of Unitarianism: The Basics of Liberal Religion Part Three Yakima Unitarian Universalist Church Yakima, WA September 27, 2020, Zoom Andrew D. Whitmont, PhD (Call to worship: words of Galen Guengerich, UU Minister in NYC.) “It’s my view that many people today have rightly recognized that established religions don’t have all the answers, that some of the answers they offer don’t make sense in our world today, and that some of the answers are downright destructive and offensive. But the rise of interest in spirituality indicates that the longing for a comprehensive sense of meaning and a deep sense of purpose, a longing historically satisfied by religion, remains unmet by secularism” Introductory song: “Spirit of Life”, lighting of chalice, joys and sorrows, etc. Good morning, everyone. Thanks for coming today. In this talk we I will seek to advance our understanding of the work of Unitarian Universalist theologian James Luther Adams and his “Five Smooth Stones” of liberal religion. Adams, you may recall, was born in 1901, raised in Ritzville, WA, educated at Harvard Divinity School and lived until 1994. He is known as the leading theologian of Unitarian Universalism in light of his clarification of the nature of liberal religion. It’s important to keep in mind that Adams’ work is about religion, an institutionalized social organization dealing with the relation between humans and The Mystery, also called God, Deity, Divinity, etc. Many of you may consider your self atheists, adeists, humanists, or non-believers and might find the explicitly metaphysical and spiritual approach of religion to be off-putting. Nonetheless, Unitarian Universalism is a bona fide religion, 2 with historical roots in the Christian tradition. When Adams says liberal religion he does not mean fundamentalism, atheism or humanism, but a path between these, avoiding their excesses and errors. Adams was the son of a literalist biblical preacher. His assumption of the presence of deity was foundational in his world view, but he rebelled against his family’s fundamentalism. At first he was outspoken in this rejection. When in college, one of his professors encouraged him to go beyond this and dive into the study of theology. He did so, enrolling at Harvard Divinity School, graduating with his doctorate in 1927. He became a Unitarian minister, then a professor of theology at Meadville/Lombard Theological School, at Harvard, and at Andover/Newton Theological seminary. In the process he sublimated his rebellion against fundamentalism to a rich and mature theology. Adams kept his religious roots but changed the fundamentalism to liberalism. To him the human condition could only be understood in the context of the Divine, but not in the old ways. In his day the alternative to fundamentalism was humanism. However, he rejected this. He viewed putting humans first as a huge mistake and he found humanism to be ultimately a failure. It was too relativistic and had no foundation. He considered ideas like situational ethics to be excuses and justifications for every kind of behavior, based on how a person feels. He called humanism a “wanton” condition, one which could only be resolved by resorting to “resolute, but groundless willfulness”, often leading to evil. He saw this as all too common in society, including among those willful people who loudly proclaimed their religious faith and used it to bully others. He saw none of this as moral and none of it in accordance with his non-relativistic and non-chaotic understanding of the human condition. Between leaving Harvard and starting at Meadville he visited Germany to study religion. This was before the second world war, and he was horrified to find there the most advanced thinking liberal theologians of his day engrossed in humanism. He saw that this humanism was providing fertile ground for the emergence of National Socialism and its development into fascism. He saw the bourgeoisie clinging to their comfortable life styles and using their versions of humanism and liberal 3 religion to justify the excesses of truly evil Nazism. He strengthened his resolve to clarify the true nature of liberal religion,so that it would not be used in support of evil, and to fight the demonstrations of willfulness that were gaining popularity in the US under the name of liberal religion. Adams was a practical theologian with a hands-on approach to religion, saying that we need liberal religion to live in this world with all its problems; that we must face the challenges of life in this world, not try to escape them in an imaginary “next world”. To him this required an awareness of God because without God in our lives we can only find the world to be meaningless, chaotic, relativistic and miserable. He strongly felt that we must use our free choice to relate to the world through what he called the Covenant with God; that this is our moral obligation as practitioners of liberal religion. This is what the third stone is about. Our relationship with God, the covenant formed in our behavior and relationships with each other. His work constituted a mid point, then between fundamentalism and humanism. In my previous talks I have not mentioned the word, “God”, only the moral obligation to build communities of love and justice. However, God enters into this discussion since the focus is the work of Adams, who was keen on this concept, and because the concept of moral obligation stems, in Adams’ understanding, from one’s relationship to God. Current day UU’s don’t do a lot of God talk. Many of us avoid it altogether, perhaps because of how we’ve seen it being over-used by other religions, or perhaps because the word God is framed in a traditional way we have rejected. But insofar as Unitarian Universalism is a religion and Adams is a theologian whose work is the source of these talks, lets take a look at God and understand what Adams means by it. God is defined by Adams in several non-traditional ways, and definitely not as an anthropomorphic being “out there”. The complexity of God is consistent with the first of the five “smooth stones”, that revelation is ongoing, and the divine mystery is an open-ended truth, an endless source of creation, which can be likened to a fountain. No one description suffices. God is constantly being revealed because God, the spiritual Mystery at the heart of life, is creatively alive and constantly changing, not something fixed 4 and stable that can be pinned down or described as a closed-ended set of ideas. Interestingly, the Bible agrees, saying in Second Corinthians, 3:6, “The written code kills, but the Spirit gives life.” Adam’s first definition of God is that God is the sustaining commanding reality. That is, God is the reality in which we exist, in which we are embedded and alive. Obviously, being ourselves parts of reality we are therefore parts of God, too. To call God the commanding reality means that we must obey. This is a simple fact of life, really. Reality is what it is and must be obeyed. It commands us. And, of course, reality is clearly what sustains us, since this is what we exist in. A result of this idea is that our relations with one another are an aspect of our relation with God. God is also described as the creative force and creative source of this same reality. Humans are invited to realize that we are therefore also creative forces. Using our creative free will we are thus co-creators with God, co-creating reality. In fact, co-creativity is our function in the universe; to co-create life and existence with God. Clearly, we do this, whether we are consciously aware of it or not. The question is how we do it. Adams calls this, “creative freedom”. While this term does not itself constitute one of the five smooth stones, recognition of the existence of creative freedom is a central reason why religion must be free. It is only when it is free that we and it can function in harmony with God. Religion is not only about theology, about God and our relation to God, as opposed to humanism, which leaves this out. Religion is also about social interaction, since, as noted, humans are an aspect or part of God. Religion is a social organization, about society, community, people coming together in groups to discover, develop, review, honor and respect their relationship to God and to each other who are also God. Liberal religion is free religion not only in our creative freedom and our freedom of belief but also in our freedom to come together in groups. This is the second “smooth stone”- free choice to associate with whom we wish, when we wish and how we wish; coming together by mutual free consent, not coercion. When we freely come together how do we relate to one another? This is the material of the third smooth stone. We use our will, 5 our efforts, our creative freedom, to create communities of justice and love, as we realize we are extensions of God and so is everyone else. This is a paradox of human nature, since we feel separate and apart, “not God”. We are able to use our co-creative abilities several ways; in service to God or for willful self-serving ends. Willfulness is broken down into three main groups. These are, will to power and dominance over others; will to knowledge and mental control; will for sensate stimulation and experiences of self-indulgence.
Recommended publications
  • Research Note James Luther Adams Bibliographies
    Research Note James Luther Adams Bibliographies JARED A. FARLEY James Luther Adams (1901-1994) is widely considered the twentieth century’s leading Unitarian theologian. Serving as professor of theology and ethics at Meadville Lombard Theological School and the Federated Theological Faculty in Chicago, IL (1936-1957), and at Harvard Divinity School in Cambridge, MA (1957-1968), Adams authored innumerable sermons, essays and book chapters. Among scholars, he is known for having translated the works of Paul Tillich and Ernst Troeltsch into English. Among students of ministry, he is recognized for his arguments concerning the religious efficacy of voluntary associations, derived from his experiences confronting Nazism in pre-World War II Germany. An intellectual with an uncanny ability to recall information and see connections across diverse subjects, Adams drew deeply from the well of theological, historical, and social concern that was his life. His writings preserve much of what he came to believe. The following two bibliographies came about as a helpful by- product of my research on James Luther Adams. These titles list and cross-reference the sermons, essays and addresses of JLA that have been reprinted in the various edited volumes of his writings, including the recently published Prophet to the Powerful (2008). They go beyond the scope of the bibliography that appears at the conclusion of Adams’ Not Without Dust And Heat (1995), and may prove advantageous, particularly as they are organized here, for the many theology students, ministers, 91 92 James Luther Adams Bibliographies / FARLEY and scholars who often turn to these collected works to become familiar with Adams’ life and work.
    [Show full text]
  • Twentieth Century (Mainly) Protestant Theologies (EMT 3542 / 6542) Fall 2017 / Thursdays, 2:00-4:00 Thomas E
    Twentieth Century (mainly) Protestant Theologies (EMT 3542 / 6542) Fall 2017 / Thursdays, 2:00-4:00 Thomas E. Reynolds [email protected] / (416) 585–4544 DRAFT – a final copy will be distributed on the first day of class Description: This course explores key figures and movements in 20th century (mainly) Protestant Theologies. The scope of investigation broadly includes liberal, neo-orthodox, political/liberation, feminist/womanist/mujerista, postliberal, postmodern, and theologies of religions. Attention will be given to representative authors and related movements. Educational methods used include lectures, discussions, presentations, and a research paper. Required Texts Most of the required reading for the course is taken from the following books, available for purchase at Crux Books, Wycliffe College or online through other distributers, or available on reserve at the Emmanuel Library: -Core Text James. C. Livingston, et. al., Modern Christian Thought, Vol II: The Twentieth Century, 2nd ed. (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2006). -Primary Texts Karl Barth, Evangelical Theology: An Introduction (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 1992) Dietrich Bonhoeffer, A Testament to Freedom: Essential Writings of Dietrich Bonhoeffer (New York: Harper One, 1995) Ada Maria Isasi-Diaz, Mujerista Theology: A Theology for the Twenty-First Century (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 1996) Paul Tillich, ed. F. Forrester Church, The Essential Tillich (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1999) Other required and recommended reading will be available on reserve in the Emmanuel College library or distributed online via the Portal. Recommended Texts Gregory Baum, ed., The Twentieth Century: A Theological Overview (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 1999) David Ford and Rachel Muers, eds., The Modern Theologians: An Introduction to Christian Theology Since 1918, 3rd ed.
    [Show full text]
  • James Luther Adams Prophet to the Powerful
    James Luther Adams Prophet to the Powerful James Luther Adams Prophet to the Powerful Edited by Herbert F. Vetter Cover Portrait of James Luther Adams Paul Hertz, 1975, Some Rights Reserved. Photographer: Jon Chase Photo Harvard Square Library, Cambridge James Luther Adams: Prophet to the Powerful This book is not copyrighted and is placed in the public domain by Harvard Square Library 2008, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02140. Published by Harvard Square Library www.harvardsquarelibrary.org ISBN: 978-0-615-25994-9 Contents I. The Life of James Luther Adams 3 Taking Time Seriously 5 James Luther Adams A Biographical and Intellectual Sketch * 15 Max L. Stackhouse Harvard Faculty Memorial Minute 43 George Kimmich Beach A Celebration of Life 49 Max L. Stackhouse II. James Luther Adams at 75* 55 Introduction by the Editor 57 The Evolution of My Social Concern 64 James Luther Adams III. James Luther Adams Papers: Six Decades * 79 1. Pessimism and Optimism in Religion 81 2. Christianity and Humanism 91 3. The Stabilizer and the Shatterer 109 4. The Liberal Christian Looks at Himself 113 5. Festschrift: Presentation to Paul Tillich 130 6. The Body and the Soul of Learning 134 IV. James Luther Adams Papers** 141 Introduction by the Editor 143 Papers 1. Our Enemy: Angelism 147 2. Religion’s Word Against Religion 154 3. The War of the Gods 156 4. Betraying the World with a Kiss 162 5. Perspectives on the Pluralistic Society 169 6. The Wrath and Love of God 176 7. The Creative Thrust of Conflict 178 8. By Their Groups Shall Ye Know Them 186 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Rerum Novarum (1893) Pius XI, Quadragesimo Anno (1931) John XXIII, Mater Et Magistra (1961) John Paul II, Centesimus Annus (1991)
    Religion and Politics After the Enlightenment GOVT-788-01 Spring 2008 Georgetown University Wednesday 12:15PM - 02:45PM Berkley Center Conference Room, 3307 M Street, Suite 200 Instructor Michael Kessler, [email protected] Course Description Recent generations have witnessed a reawakening of potent, even vehement, forms of political theologies. Across the globe, vigorous political expression of impassioned belief has emerged within contemporary political orders. Even when political theologies do not turn to physical violence, recent advocates have espoused taking control of the political order for religiously-motivated goals, using a vast arsenal of legal, cultural, and electoral means. This surge of political religion comes at a time when forces of urbanization, globalization, and advances in knowledge and technology have spread, forces that were supposed to quell religious piety and make faith increasingly benign, according to many academics and secular theorists. Religion has not become a domesticated sphere, separated from politics and other sectors of human society. Countering the so-called secularization thesis, God’s followers have not receded quietly and they increasingly assert their role in the political order. This persistence of political theologies poses many important issues: How do religions legitimate their political activity? How do religions, newly conscious of history, time, and material reality, shape their political activity? How do they grapple with modern demands of reason and the principles of liberal democracy in formulating their political agenda? How can liberal democratic political communities, shaped by enlightenment ideals, accommodate—or cabin—political theologies? As religious thinkers in the West grappled with the meaning of modernity and how religious belief and practice could properly, if at all, enter into the public sphere, they came to a new understanding of the limits of power politics and the role of religion in shaping the collective order.
    [Show full text]
  • Unitarian Universalist Theology Renaissance Module ONLINE
    Unitarian Universalist Theology Renaissance Module ONLINE VERSION PARTICIPANT GUIDE By Lynn Ungar and Sara Lewis © 2018 by the Faith Development Office of the UUA, Boston, MA Table of Contents About the Authors; Acknowledgement 3 Overview of Sessions 4 Introduction to the Module 6 Pre-Module Assignments 16 Session 1: What Is Theology? 17 Session 2: Early Unitarianism and Universalism 34 Session 3: Expanding Beyond Christian Roots 40 Session 4: More 20th Century Influences 48 Session 5: 21st Century UU Theology 55 Session 6: Closing Session 59 UU Theology Renaissance Module, ONLINE Participant Guide 2 About the Authors Rev. Dr. Lynn Ungar holds an M.Div. from Starr King School for the Ministry and a D. Min. in religious education from McCormick Theological seminary. She has served as a parish minister in Moscow, Idaho and in Chicago, and as a director of religious education in Fremont and Hayward, California. She currently serves as minister for lifespan learning for the Church of the Larger Fellowship, our online UU congregation (www.questformeaning.org and www.clfuu.org ). Lynn is co-author of the Tapestry of Faith curricula Faithful Journeys and Love Connects Us and author of Sing to the Power. Lynn’s poetry can be found in a variety of publications, including her latest book Bread and Other Miracles. She is the composer of the round, “Come, Come, Whoever You Are,” Hymn 188 in Singing the Living Tradition. Sara Lewis, unchurched in her early years, found Unitarian Universalism in her teen years and has served as Director of Religious Education at the Olympia Unitarian Universalist Congregation in Olympia, Washington since 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • The Self in Contemporary Liberal Religion: a Constructive Critique Paul B
    The Self in Contemporary Liberal Religion: A Constructive Critique Paul B. Rasor One of the most enduring legacies of the Enlightenment is its highly individualistic view of the human self. This view of the self became a central characteristic of the liberal-modern worldview, and it quickly found its way into the religious liberalism that emerged in the wake of the Enlightenment. Yet today, this individualistic understanding of the self is increasingly untenable. Philosophers, social scientists, psychologists, linguists, and theologians now generally agree that our liberal understanding of ourselves as autonomous individuals is an illusion. We don't first exist as individuals who then form social groups. Instead, the group always comes first, and the individual is formed by and always exists in relation to a larger social context. We are social beings through and through. Yet despite widespread contemporary agreement that the human self is fundamentally intersubjective or social in nature, a strong and potentially destructive emphasis on individualism continues to dominate the self- understanding of many religious liberals, including those within the Unitarian Universalist tradition. I believe we religious liberals need to get over ourselves. We need a more suitable understanding of the self as social, and in this article, I want to suggest an approach toward constructing such a conception. I begin by tracing the philosophy of subjectivity that emerged in the Enlightenment and that became the basis for the liberal-modern understanding of the self. I also sketch the more recent developments that began to undermine this view (part I). I then describe the individualistic self-understanding I believe to be prominent and problematic among religious liberals today (part II).
    [Show full text]
  • Ethical Motifs and Moral Agency Syllabus
    THEOLOGY 620/267: Ethical Motifs and Moral Agency Union Presbyterian Seminary Dr. Katie G. Cannon Fall Semester 2011 (804) 278-4331 Watts Hall 306, ext 331 Wednesday 8:30 a.m. – 11:20 am Office Hour: by appointment only Course Description: This seminar interfaces the content, context, and motifs of formative theological ethicists with the urgency of contemporary issues that constructively challenge human flourishing and justice-making moral agency in the 21st century. Objectives: 1) to grasp the historical and theological significance of ethical methodologies for authentic Christian discipleship; 2) to understand how literature functions as symbolic expression of social-cultural-moral constructions; 3) to disentangle the discrepancies between ecclesiastically recognized rules and general practices of supremacist values and policies; and 4) to critique the various ways that religion has both empowered and disenfranchised individuals in the struggle to actualize an embodied sacred self. Procedures: Seminarians will carry the chief responsibility of each meeting of the course. For each class session one or more students will be designated as Initiator(s) of Discussion. Initiators of Discussion have the following responsibilities: to open with a devotional moment; to share a comprehensive definition (what/how/why) of a theological doctrine and an ethical concept to be included in our collective working lexicon (post definitions on the blackboard website by 12 noon on Tuesday); and to distribute to all participants a photocopy of the talking paper in accordance with the ethical analysis guidelines. At least one student will volunteer as a Recorder for each meeting of the course. The Recorder(s) will take notes of the discussion and prepare a record.
    [Show full text]
  • Spirit of Life: an Ancient Concept for Post-Modern Times
    the Unitarian Universalist School of the Graduate Theological Union Spirit of Life: An Ancient Concept for Post-modern Times Susan B. Wilkes Susan B. Wilkes was a student in the Starr King School fall 2005 online course, “Our Theological House: An Introduction to Unitarian Univesalist Theologies,” taught by the Rev. Roy Phillips. For more information about SKSM’s Online Education courses, visit www.online.sksm.edu. Spirit of Life, come unto me. Sing in my heart all the stirrings of compassion. Blow in the wind, rise in the sea; Move in the hand, giving life the shape of justice. Roots hold me close; wings set me free Spirit of Life, come to me, come to me. Singing in the Living Tradition, 1993, Hymn 123 In Christian theology, the Holy Spirit is the third person in the Trinitarian model of the Godhead. The concept of the spirit originates in the Hebrew scriptures, which use the word “ruach,” meaning breath or wind, as a way of speaking of God’s activity in the world. Through pneumatology, the theological study of the Holy Spirit, views regarding the spirit have evolved for centuries, incorporating New Testament Christology and modern theological views. In the Unitarian Universalist tradition, which never conceptualized the spirit as a person, pneumatology has received remarkably little theological attention. However, recently prominent theologian and Starr King School of Ministry President Reverend Rebecca Parker (Parker, 2002) articulated a distinctive contemporary UU pneumatology much more consistent with the Old Testament concept of “ruach” than with New Testament notions of the “Holy Ghost.” This paper will provide an overview of pneumatologi- cal thought, with focus on American Unitarian Universalist pneumatology.
    [Show full text]
  • GA Talk: James Luther Adams and the Transformation of Liberalism
    James Luther Adams and the Transformation of Liberalism1 George Kimmich Beach Transforming Liberalism is the first book-length treatment of Adams’s thought since John R. Wilcox’s doctoral dissertation, published in 1978. Which is odd, considering the frequency with which we invoke the name, James Luther Adams. Do we invoke his name because he charmed us, and ignore his thought because it offends us? Let’s see. I want to do three things. First, to say a few words about Jim Adams for those unfamiliar with him. Second, to say three things about how the book deals with his thought. Third, to say six things about the transforming liberal faith that he articulated. Part I Who was James Luther Adams? He tells that he was once asked by a Boston matron, “What branch of the Adams family are you from, Dr. Adams?” He replied, “The poor white trash branch, ma’am.” His forebears had migrated from Southside Virginia to eastern Washington State, where he was born in 1901. His father was a Baptist minister, who switched to the Plymouth Brethren when he decided he must be a “tent-making” minister, after St. Paul’s example, and no longer accept pay for preaching the Gospel. (What? No wedding fee schedule?) Jim learned from an early age what Dietrich Bonhoeffer meant by “costing commitment.” To further his “deprovincialization” (as he called his college education) he went to the University of Minnesota— chosen so he could continue working on the railroad, supporting himself and his family. He passed in quick succession from his childhood fundamentalism, to adolescent atheism, to the Humanism of John Dietrich.
    [Show full text]
  • Forum on Religion and Ecology Christianity and Ecology Bibliography
    Forum on Religion and Ecology Christianity and Ecology Bibliography Bibliography by: Peter W. Bakken, Au Sable Institute of Environmental Studies Abbate, Michael. Gardening Eden: How Creation Care Will Change Your Faith, Your Life, and Our World. Colorado Springs: Waterbrook Press, 2009. Achtemeier, Elizabeth. Nature, God and Pulpit. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 1992. Adams, Carol J., ed. Ecofeminism and the Sacred. New York: Continuum, 1993. Albanese, Catherine L. Nature Religion in America: From the Algonkian Indians to the New Age. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press, 1990. American Teilhard Association. Teilhard Studies. American Teilhard Association, 1978- Present. http://teilharddechardin.org/index.php/teilhard-studies Anderson, Bernhard W. From Creation to New Creation: Old Testament Perspectives. Minneapolis, Minn.: Fortress, 1994. Anderson, Bernhard W., ed. Creation in the Old Testament. Philadelphia, Pa.: Fortress, 1984. Anglemeyer, Mary, Eleanor R. Seagraves, and Catherine C. LeMaistre, compilers. A Search for Environmental Ethics: An Initial Bibliography. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1980. Arendse, Roger A. “The Historical Jesus, Eschatology, and Hope for the Earth?” Scriptura 66 (1998): 245-268. Attfield, Robin. “Christian Attitudes to Nature.” Journal of the History of Ideas 44, no. 3 (1983): 369–86. --------. “Western Traditions and Environmental Ethics.” In Environmental Philosophy: A Collection of Readings, eds. Robert Elliott and Arran Gare, 201–30. University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1983. Austin, Richard Cartwright. Reclaiming America: Restoring Nature to Culture. Environmental Theology. Vol. 4. Abingdon, Va.: Creekside Press, 1990. --------. Hope for the Land: Nature in the Bible. Environmental Theology. Vol. 3. Atlanta, Ga.: John Knox Press, 1988. --------. Beauty of the Lord: Awakening the Senses.
    [Show full text]
  • Rev. Charlotte Lehmann 15. March 2020 Thomas Jefferson Memorial Church – Unitarian Universalist Charlottesville, VA
    1 Invest in Your Own Religious Freedom! Rev. Charlotte Lehmann 15. March 2020 Thomas Jefferson Memorial Church – Unitarian Universalist Charlottesville, VA GREETING & ANNOUNCEMENTS WORDS OF WELCOME Whoever you are Whomever you love However you express your identity Whatever your situation in life Whatever your experience of the holy As you come seeking love Your presence here is a gift. Whether you are filled with sadness Overflowing with joy Needing to be alone with yourself Or eager to engage with others All who welcome all are welcome here. PRELUDE LIGHTING THE CHALICE We gather this hour as people of faith With joys and sorrows, gifts and needs. We light this beacon of hope, Sign of our quest for truth and meaning In celebration of the life we share together. (Rev. Christine Robinson) OPENING WORDS from “The Indispensible Discipline of Social Responsibility: Voluntary Organizations” by James Luther Adams In his essay “The Indispensible Discipline of Social Responsibility and Voluntary Organizations”, Unitarian theologian James Luther Adams wrote, Immediately after the Second World War, the Swiss theologian Karl Barth …pointed to a characteristic feature of any democratic society, namely, freedom of association. Every totalitarian theory rejects just this freedom. Indeed, the rejection of freedom of association, the rejection of the freedom to form groups that attempt democratically to affect public policy, can serve as the beginning of a definition of totalitarianism. 2 …[O]nly through the exercise of freedom of association can consent of the governed become effective; only through the exercise of freedom of association can the citizen in a democracy participate in the process that gives shape to public opinion and to public policy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Arts and Theological Education
    Theological Education Sacred Imagination: The Arts and Theological Education Volume XXXI Number 1 Autumn 1994 ISSN 0040-5620 Theological Education Sacred Imagination: The Arts and Theological Education Volume XXXI Number 1 Autumn 1994 ISSN 0040-5620 THEOLOGICAL EDUCATION Volume XXXI, Number 1 JAMES L. WAITS, Executive Editor WILSON YATES, Contributing Editor NANCY MERRILL, Managing Editor Theological Education is published semiannually by The Association of Theological Schools IN THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA 10 Summit Park Drive Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15275-1103 Subscription Rates Per Year (U>S> address) $7.00 Per Year (non-U.S. address) $8.00 10 or more to the same address $5.00 per copy Single Copy $5.00* *Plus Postage and Handling Indexed with abstracts in Religion Index One: Periodicals, American Theological Library Association, Chicago, Illinois. Available on-line through BRS (Bibliographic Retrieval Services) in Latham, New York, and DIALOG in Palo Alto, California. Contents Introduction 1 Wilson Yates THE ARTS AND THEOLOGICAL EDUCATION Characteristics of Art 5 and the Character of Theological Education Frank Burch Brown Theology, the Arts, and Theological Education 13 Gordon D. Kaufman Theological Education and the Arts: Four Comments 23 Edward Farley Arguments and Allies: The Yale Consultations 29 and Recent Writings about Theological Education Barbara G. Wheeler Art and Multiculturalism: 37 Competitors or Allies in Theological Education? William A. Dyrness Theology and the Arts Dialogue: 47 Tasks for Theological Education Wilson Yates THE VISUAL ARTS IN THEOLOGICAL EDUCATION A Willem de Kooning Triptych 59 John W. Cook The Revelatory Body: 75 Signorelli's Resurrection of the Flesh at Orvieto Margaret R.
    [Show full text]