Working Group on Zooplankton Ecology Ices

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Working Group on Zooplankton Ecology Ices Oceanography Committee ICES CM 2001/C:07 Ref.: ACME Report of the Working Group on Zooplankton Ecology and joint meeting with Working Group on Phytoplankton Ecology Bergen, Norway 26–29 March 2001 This report is not to be quoted without prior consultation with the General Secretary. The document is a report of an expert group under the auspices of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea and does not necessarily represent the views of the Council. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer Palægade 2–4 DK–1261 Copenhagen K Denmark TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................1 1 OPENING OF THE MEETING.................................................................................................................................2 2 ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA ...............................................................................................................................2 3 REPORT OF THE OCEANOGRAPHY COMMITTEE MEETING AT THE 88TH STATUTORY MEETING......3 4 RESULTS FROM STANDARD SECTIONS AND STATIONS: INPUTS TO THE SUMMARY STATUS REPORT ON THE ZOOPLANKTON MONITORING STRUCTURE IN THE ICES AREA. (TOR A) ................4 5 USES OF BIOLOGICAL INDICES AND DATA PRODUCED IN A ROUTINE BASIS FOR THE FISHERIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT GROUPS (TOR B)..............................................................................5 6 COMPILATION OF RESULTS, PUBLICATIONS, AND OTHER MATERIAL FROM THE JUNE 1993 SEA- GOING WORKSHOP IN STORFJORDEN (TOR C)...............................................................................................6 7 RESULTS OF THE WORKSHOP ON TAXONOMY OF CALANOIDS HELD IN TERRAMARE (GERMANY) 14– 17 MAY 2000 (TOR D) ......................................................................................................................................7 8 ORGANIZATION OF THE ICES/PICES/GLOBEC SYMPOSIUM (TOR E).........................................................9 9 KEY QUESTIONS REQUIRING INTERDISCIPLINARY DIALOGUE FOR A POSSIBLE JOINT MEETING OF OCEANOGRAPHY COMMITTEE WORKING GROUPS IN 2002 (TOR F).................................................10 10 JOINT MEETING WITH THE WORKING GROUP ON PHYTOPLANKTON ECOLOGY (TOR G)................12 11 ANY OTHER BUSINESS .......................................................................................................................................13 12 ACTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND DRAFT RESOLUTIONS...................................................................14 ANNEX 1 – LIST OF PARTICIPANTS ..........................................................................................................................17 ANNEX 2 – AGENDA AND PROGRAMME.................................................................................................................18 ANNEX 3 – EVOLUTION OF THE ICES WORKING GROUP ON ZOOPLANKTON ECOLOGY BY THEIR TERMS OF REFERENCE .......................................................................................................................................21 ANNEX 4 – STRUCTURE OF THE OCEANOGRAPHY COMMITTEE AS IT IS SEEN BY THE WORKING GROUP ON ZOOPLANKTON ECOLOGY ...........................................................................................................22 ANNEX 5 – ZOOPLANKTON MONITORING RESULTS IN THE ICES AREA, SUMMARY STATUS REPORT 1999/2000.................................................................................................................................................................23 ANNEX 6 – LIST OF INDICES OF POTENTIAL VALUE FOR ASSESSMENT GROUPS .......................................37 ANNEX 7 – LIST OF GEARS AND DEPOYMENTS OF SAMPLING DEVICES DURING THE SEA-GOING WORKSHOP............................................................................................................................................................38 ANNEX 8 – CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE ZOOPLANKTON TAXONOMY WORKSHOP............................................................................................................................................................40 ANNEX 9 – POSSIBLE KEY QUESTIONS FOR THE 2002 OCEANOGRAPHY COMMITTEE JOINT MEETING42 ANNEX 10 – MINUTES OF THE ICES WORKING GROUP ON ZOOPLANKTON ECOLOGY AND WORKING GROUP ON PHYTOPLANKTON ECOLOGY JOINT MEETING .......................................................................44 1 OPENING OF THE JOINT MEETING...................................................................................................................46 2 ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA .............................................................................................................................46 3 DISCUSSION...........................................................................................................................................................46 3.I) Limits to modelling phytoplankton-zooplankton interactions.......................................................................46 3.II) How do characteristics of phytoplanktonic diet (size, morphology, physiological condition, toxicity) influence zooplankton ingestion rates, fecundity, viability, somatic growth and reproduction?...................48 3.III) Can a collapse in grazing pressure lead to symptoms of eutrophication? .....................................................49 3.IV) Ways of improving the phytoplankton and zooplankton components in GOOS...........................................49 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 3.V) Consider the scientific and operational merits of inclusion of, respectively, primary production measures and zooplankton studies in JAMP eutrophication monitoring programmes..................................................51 3.VI) Consider the possibility of merging...............................................................................................................51 4 ANY OTHER BUSSINESS .....................................................................................................................................52 @# ii 0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The meeting was held at the Institute of Marine Research (IMR) at Bergen, from 26–29 of March and was attended by 8 members of the Working Group on Zooplankton Ecology representing 5 ICES countries. The discussion of the Terms of Reference was preceded by an introduction on the Oceanography Committee discussions during the 88th Statutory Meeting. This included an outline of the current structure of the OC and the possibility that the Working Group on Zooplankton Ecology might be incorporated into a new functional group. The evolution of the group was outlined by looking at the list of Tors discussed since its foundation nine years ago and at the list of deliverables that were produced in this period. It was also noted that the actions proposed by the group at its 2000 meeting [(i) Publication of a web page on the Zooplankton Methodological Manual and (ii) Edition of the Zooplankton Status Report] were achieved on schedule. The discussion on Tor a “Inputs to the Summary Status Report on the zooplankton monitoring structure in the ICES area” gained the unanimous support of all the members in considering the Summary Status Report as an annual contribution of this group to the OC and resulted in the identification of the ways in which the report for the year 2000– 2001 could be improved without involving major new work. The use of biological indices and data produced on a routine basis for the fisheries and environmental assessment groups (Tor b) is something demanded from different panels (US GLOBEC, SPACC, ICES) and the group decided to be proactive in this discussion. A list of indices of potential value for understanding zooplankton dynamics and ecosystem functioning was produced (the list is open to new items). This Tor was considered to have high relevance for the group and further discussions are needed before clear conclusions can be achieved. A compilation of the results, publications and other material from the June 1993 Seagoing Workshop in Storfjorden (Tor c) was presented. The information is now archived in four CD-ROM: Methods and Results (1 CD), Acoustic data (2 CDs) and Video images on the use of plankton gears at sea (1 CD). The members of the group acknowledged the effort required for the compilation of these results and it was proposed that the four CD-ROM set should be offered to ICES for wider distribution. The results of the Workshop on taxonomy of Calanoids (Germany, 14–17 May, 2000) conducted under the auspices of this Working Group were presented and the conclusions reviewed (Tor d). The group supported the conclusions and decided: (i) to support a new workshop on taxonomy in 2003, SAHFOS offered its premises to hold the workshop and the group accepted its invitation (SAHFOS is widely recognised for its excellence in plankton taxonomy and possesses the facilities necessary for holding such a workshop); and (ii) compile in a “demonstration CD-ROM” a scanned version of all the plankton leaflets published by ICES since 1939 which will be linked by a numerical and taxonomic index (i.e., Plankton leaflet No. 187). A first version of the “Demo CD-ROM” (with a dozen leaflets) will be presented during the 2001 ASC. The ultimate objective is that ICES could offer such products to a larger community of scientists. The current advances in the organization
Recommended publications
  • Kinematic and Dynamic Scaling of Copepod Swimming
    fluids Review Kinematic and Dynamic Scaling of Copepod Swimming Leonid Svetlichny 1,* , Poul S. Larsen 2 and Thomas Kiørboe 3 1 I.I. Schmalhausen Institute of Zoology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Str. B. Khmelnytskogo, 15, 01030 Kyiv, Ukraine 2 DTU Mechanical Engineering, Fluid Mechanics, Technical University of Denmark, Building 403, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark; [email protected] 3 Centre for Ocean Life, Danish Technical University, DTU Aqua, Building 202, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 30 March 2020; Accepted: 6 May 2020; Published: 11 May 2020 Abstract: Calanoid copepods have two swimming gaits, namely cruise swimming that is propelled by the beating of the cephalic feeding appendages and short-lasting jumps that are propelled by the power strokes of the four or five pairs of thoracal swimming legs. The latter may be 100 times faster than the former, and the required forces and power production are consequently much larger. Here, we estimated the magnitude and size scaling of swimming speed, leg beat frequency, forces, power requirements, and energetics of these two propulsion modes. We used data from the literature together with new data to estimate forces by two different approaches in 37 species of calanoid copepods: the direct measurement of forces produced by copepods attached to a tensiometer and the indirect estimation of forces from swimming speed or acceleration in combination with experimentally estimated drag coefficients. Depending on the approach, we found that the propulsive forces, both for cruise swimming and escape jumps, scaled with prosome length (L) to a power between 2 and 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Invertebrate Animals (Metazoa: Invertebrata) of the Atanasovsko Lake, Bulgaria
    Historia naturalis bulgarica, 22: 45-71, 2015 Invertebrate Animals (Metazoa: Invertebrata) of the Atanasovsko Lake, Bulgaria Zdravko Hubenov, Lyubomir Kenderov, Ivan Pandourski Abstract: The role of the Atanasovsko Lake for storage and protection of the specific faunistic diversity, characteristic of the hyper-saline lakes of the Bulgarian seaside is presented. The fauna of the lake and surrounding waters is reviewed, the taxonomic diversity and some zoogeographical and ecological features of the invertebrates are analyzed. The lake system includes from freshwater to hyper-saline basins with fast changing environment. A total of 6 types, 10 classes, 35 orders, 82 families and 157 species are known from the Atanasovsko Lake and the surrounding basins. They include 56 species (35.7%) marine and marine-brackish forms and 101 species (64.3%) brackish-freshwater, freshwater and terrestrial forms, connected with water. For the first time, 23 species in this study are established (12 marine, 1 brackish and 10 freshwater). The marine and marine- brackish species have 4 types of ranges – Cosmopolitan, Atlantic-Indian, Atlantic-Pacific and Atlantic. The Atlantic (66.1%) and Cosmopolitan (23.2%) ranges that include 80% of the species, predominate. Most of the fauna (over 60%) has an Atlantic-Mediterranean origin and represents an impoverished Atlantic-Mediterranean fauna. The freshwater-brackish, freshwater and terrestrial forms, connected with water, that have been established from the Atanasovsko Lake, have 2 main types of ranges – species, distributed in the Palaearctic and beyond it and species, distributed only in the Palaearctic. The representatives of the first type (52.4%) predomi- nate. They are related to the typical marine coastal habitats, optimal for the development of certain species.
    [Show full text]
  • Translation Series No. 893
    (y-2, /' 7 'FISHERIES RESEARCH BOARD OF CANADA Translation Series No. 893 . Population dynamics and annual production of Acartia clausi Giesbr. and Centruagfs kreiyeri Giesbr, in the neritic zone of the Black Sej- By V.N. Greze and E.P. Baldina Original title: Dinamika populyatsil ± godovaya produktsiya Acartia olausi Giesbr. ± Centropages . kryeri Giesb17. V—neritich-eskoi zone Chernogo morya.; From: Trudy Sevastopoltskoi Biologicheskoi Stantsii, Akademiya Nauk Ukrainskoi SSR, Vol. 17, pp. 249-261. 1964. Translated by the Translation Bureau (AK) Foreign Languages Division Department of the Secretary of State of Canada Fisheries Research Board of Canada Atlantic Oceanographic Group Dartmouth, N. S., 1967 e■n“ ' ,e,ea 44. Pe5 ■• • • • • 7682-7 hdouncUon sulp,Incnt • PepUlation .dynamics and,Annual/roduction of Acartla_ . dlausi Gicsbr. and Cenrog2ges'Myerl._Giesbr. in the I\Tritic lone of the Black Sea , By V.N.Greze and E.P.Baldina. /From: "Transactions of the Sevastopol Biological Station. Volume XVII, 1964, published by the Ukranian SSR Academy of Sciences, Kiev./ Beginning with May 1960, systematic observations were carried out at the Sevastopol Biological Station of the dy- namics of the numbers of the zooplankton within the ten-mile btoje coastal zone of the Black Sea. Thesi§ask)of the research was a study of the seasonal changes in the quantity of the mass species of the plankton and of their various stages of deve- v lopment, as well as a determination of the Evalues of tI an- nual production. In this article are shown the first,results obtained 1 as a result of the treatment. of the annual cycle of collec- 1/ocuee.f) tions in 1960-61, ac-c-Œrd-Ing-to two species of copepodslrlth different ecology - .
    [Show full text]
  • A Simulation of the Distribution of Acartia Clausi During Oregon Upwelling, August 1973
    Journal of Plankton Research Volume 2 Number 1 1980 A simulation of the distribution of Acartia clausi during Oregon Upwelling, August 1973 J.S.Wroblewski Department of Oceanography, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H4J1, Canada Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/plankt/article-abstract/2/1/43/1463810 by Old Dominion University user on 08 July 2019 (Received August 1979; revised November 1979; accepted December 1979) Abstract. The distribution of the estuarine copepod Acartia clausi in coastal waters off Oregon during an upwelling period in August 1973 is simulated. A time dependent, two dimensional (x, z, t) model relates maximum offshore extent of the copepod's four life stages (egg, nauplius, copepodite, and adult) to in- tensity of the wind stress driving the upwelling circulation, stage development time, and mortality. Realistic solutions are obtained by using actual intermittent wind forcing recorded by an anemometer at Newport. Offshore transport is overestimated when the circulation model is driven by theoretical con- tinuous winds, suggesting zooplankton may be washed out of coastal upwelling zones (e.g. off Northwest Africa) which undergo periods of prolonged upwelling. With an accurate model of offshore transport and stage development time, the mismatch between predicted and observed distributions may be used to estimate field mortality of the various stages. Introduction Zooplankton standing stock was once believed to be greater in the slope region off Oregon than over the continental shelf during the summer upwelling season. Peterson (1972) surveyed the oceanic, slope and shelf regions but did not sample the nearshore zone when making this conclusion. In a detailed study of the Oregon up- welling zone, Peterson and Miller (1975) found high concentrations of copepods in the upper 20 m of the water column within 15 km of the coast during the 1969-71 upwelling seasons, as did Myers (1975) in August, 1973.
    [Show full text]
  • Acartia Tonsa
    NOBANIS - Marine invasive species in Nordic waters - Fact Sheet Acartia tonsa Author of this species fact sheet: Kathe R. Jensen, Zoological Museum, Natural History Museum of Denmark, Universiteteparken 15, 2100 København Ø, Denmark. Phone: +45 353-21083, E-mail: [email protected] Bibliographical reference – how to cite this fact sheet: Jensen, Kathe R. (2010): NOBANIS – Invasive Alien Species Fact Sheet – Acartia tonsa – From: Identification key to marine invasive species in Nordic waters – NOBANIS www.nobanis.org, Date of access x/x/201x. Species description Species name Acartia tonsa, Dana, 1849 – a planktonic copepod Synonyms Acartia (Acanthacartia) tonsa; Acartia giesbrechti Dahl, 1894; Acartia bermudensis Esterly, 1911; Acartia floridana Davis, 1948; Acartia gracilis Herrick, 1887; Acartia tonsa cryophylla Björnberg, 1963. Common names Aerjas tömbik (tulnuk-tömbik) (EE), Hankajalkaisäyriäinen (FI), Hoppkräfta (SE), Acartia, akartsia (RU) Identification Several similar species occur in the area: Acartia clausi Giesbrecht, 1889, A. longiremis (Liljeborg, 1853) and A. bifilosa (Giesbrecht, 1881). The latter species prefers low salinity waters (David et al., 2007), like A. tonsa, whereas A. clausi prefers high salinities (Calliari et al., 2006). A. longremis has a northern boreal-arctic distribution (Lee & McAlice, 1979), whereas A. clausi is widespread in warmer waters including the Mediterranean and Black Sea (Gubanova, 2000). Acartia tonsa is usually about 1 mm long (up to 1.5 mm) (Garmew et al., 1994; Belmonte et al., 1994; Marcus & Wilcox, 2007) and hence a microscope is required for identification. It has a relatively short abdomen, and relative body width is higher than in sympatric congeners. Females are only slightly larger than males, whereas in A.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to the Meso-Scale Production of the Copepod Acartia Tonsa
    Guide to the meso-scale production of the copepod Acartia tonsa Item Type monograph Authors Marchus, Nancy H.; Wilcox, Jeffrey A. Publisher Florida Sea Grant College Program Download date 29/09/2021 06:32:05 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/20023 A GUIDE TO THE MESO-SCALE PRODUCTION OF THE COPEPOD ACARTIA TONSA Nancy H. Marcus and Jeffrey A. Wilcox Florida State University Department of Oceanography Biological Oceanography This manual is based on research supported by three separate agencies: the United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (ARS) through the Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institution (HBOI) via a sub- contract (#20021007) to N. Marcus, G. Buzyna, and J. Wilcox , the State of Florida Department of Agriculture through a grant to the Mote Marine Laboratory and a sub-contract (MML-185491B) to N. Marcus; and a grant from the Florida Sea Grant College Program (project R/LR-A-36) to N. Marcus. Appreciation is also expressed for the labors of Alan Michels, Patrick Tracy, Chris Sedlacek, Cris Oppert, Laban Lindley, Guillaume Drillet, and Glenn Miller, as well as for the support of the Florida State University Marine Laboratory staff. This publication was supported by the National Sea Grant College Program of the U.S. Department of Commerce’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Grant No. NA16RG-2195. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of these organizations. This digital resource, “A Guide to the Meso-Scale Production of the Copepod Acartia tonsa,” is protected by copyrights, freely accessible for non-commercial and non-derivative use, and available for download.
    [Show full text]
  • Exotic Species in the Aegean, Marmara, Black, Azov and Caspian Seas
    EXOTIC SPECIES IN THE AEGEAN, MARMARA, BLACK, AZOV AND CASPIAN SEAS Edited by Yuvenaly ZAITSEV and Bayram ÖZTÜRK EXOTIC SPECIES IN THE AEGEAN, MARMARA, BLACK, AZOV AND CASPIAN SEAS All rights are reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior permission from the Turkish Marine Research Foundation (TÜDAV) Copyright :Türk Deniz Araştırmaları Vakfı (Turkish Marine Research Foundation) ISBN :975-97132-2-5 This publication should be cited as follows: Zaitsev Yu. and Öztürk B.(Eds) Exotic Species in the Aegean, Marmara, Black, Azov and Caspian Seas. Published by Turkish Marine Research Foundation, Istanbul, TURKEY, 2001, 267 pp. Türk Deniz Araştırmaları Vakfı (TÜDAV) P.K 10 Beykoz-İSTANBUL-TURKEY Tel:0216 424 07 72 Fax:0216 424 07 71 E-mail :[email protected] http://www.tudav.org Printed by Ofis Grafik Matbaa A.Ş. / İstanbul -Tel: 0212 266 54 56 Contributors Prof. Abdul Guseinali Kasymov, Caspian Biological Station, Institute of Zoology, Azerbaijan Academy of Sciences. Baku, Azerbaijan Dr. Ahmet Kıdeys, Middle East Technical University, Erdemli.İçel, Turkey Dr. Ahmet . N. Tarkan, University of Istanbul, Faculty of Fisheries. Istanbul, Turkey. Prof. Bayram Ozturk, University of Istanbul, Faculty of Fisheries and Turkish Marine Research Foundation, Istanbul, Turkey. Dr. Boris Alexandrov, Odessa Branch, Institute of Biology of Southern Seas, National Academy of Ukraine. Odessa, Ukraine. Dr. Firdauz Shakirova, National Institute of Deserts, Flora and Fauna, Ministry of Nature Use and Environmental Protection of Turkmenistan. Ashgabat, Turkmenistan. Dr. Galina Minicheva, Odessa Branch, Institute of Biology of Southern Seas, National Academy of Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • Acartiidae Sars, G.O. 1903
    Acartiidae Sars G.O, 1903 Genuario Belmonte Leaflet No. 194 I February 2021 ICES IDENTIFICATION LEAFLETS FOR PLANKTON FICHES D’IDENTIFICATION DU ZOOPLANCTON Revised version of Leaflet No. 181 ICES INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR THE EXPLORATION OF THE SEA CIEM CONSEIL INTERNATIONAL POUR L’EXPLORATION DE LA MER International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer H. C. Andersens Boulevard 44–46 DK-1553 Copenhagen V Denmark Telephone (+45) 33 38 67 00 Telefax (+45) 33 93 42 15 www.ices.dk [email protected] Series editor: Antonina dos Santos and Lidia Yebra Prepared under the auspices of the ICES Working Group on Zooplankton Ecology (WGZE) This leaflet has undergone a formal external peer-review process Recommended format for purpose of citation: Belmonte, G. 2021. Acartiidae Sars G.O, 1903. ICES Identification Leaflets for Plankton No. 194. 29 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.7680 ISBN number: 978-87-7482-555-5 ISSN number: 2707-675X Cover Image: Inês M. Dias and Lígia F. de Sousa for ICES ID Plankton Leaflets This document has been produced under the auspices of an ICES Expert Group. The contents therein do not necessarily represent the view of the Council. © 2021 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). For citation of datasets or conditions for use of data to be included in other databases, please refer to ICES data policy. |ii ICES Identification Leaflets for Plankton No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Copepod Acartia Tonsa Dana in a Microtidal Mediterranean Lagoon: History of a Successful Invasion
    water Article The Copepod Acartia tonsa Dana in a Microtidal Mediterranean Lagoon: History of a Successful Invasion Elisa Camatti *, Marco Pansera and Alessandro Bergamasco Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto di Scienze Marine (CNR ISMAR), Arsenale Tesa 104, Castello 2737/F, 30122 Venezia, Italy; [email protected] (M.P.); [email protected] (A.B.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-041-2407-978 Received: 13 May 2019; Accepted: 5 June 2019; Published: 8 June 2019 Abstract: The Lagoon of Venicehas been recognized as a hot spot for the introduction of nonindigenous species. Several anthropogenic factors as well as environmental stressors concurred to make this ecosystem ideal for invasion. Given the zooplankton ecological relevance related to the role in the marine trophic network, changes in the community have implications for environmental management and ecosystem services. This work aims to depict the relevant steps of the history of invasion of the copepod Acartia tonsa in the Venice lagoon, providing a recent picture of its distribution, mainly compared to congeneric residents. In this work, four datasets of mesozooplankton were examined. The four datasets covered a period from 1975 to 2017 and were used to investigate temporal trends as well as the changes in coexistence patterns among the Acartia species before and after A. tonsa settlement. Spatial distribution of A. tonsa was found to be significantly associated with temperature, phytoplankton, particulate organic carbon (POC), chlorophyll a, and counter gradient of salinity, confirming that A. tonsa is an opportunistic tolerant species. As for previously dominant species, Paracartia latisetosa almost disappeared, and Acartia margalefi was not completely excluded.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF with Suppl. Material
    Science of the Total Environment 703 (2020) 134505 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Science of the Total Environment journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/scitotenv Alien animal introductions in Iberian inland waters: An update and analysis ⇑ Rafael Muñoz-Mas , Emili García-Berthou GRECO, Institute of Aquatic Ecology, University of Girona, 17003 Girona, Spain graphical abstract article info abstract Article history: Inland waters provide innumerable ecosystem services and for this reason are among the most negatively Received 31 July 2019 impacted ecosystems worldwide. This is also the case with invasive alien species, which have enormous Received in revised form 15 September economic and ecological impacts in freshwater ecosystems. The pace of alien introductions has not 2019 decreased in recent years and the first step to their management is to update checklists and to determine Accepted 15 September 2019 introduction pathways and origins of species. This study updates the list of alien animal species intro- Available online 31 October 2019 duced and naturalised in inland waters of the Iberian Peninsula. Additionally, the most relevant charac- Editor: Dr. Damia Barcelo teristics and association patterns of these species (region of origin, taxonomic group, introduction pathway and main habitat) and introduction trends in the Iberian Peninsula, mainland Portugal and Keywords: Galicia are analysed. We identified 125 alien animal species introduced in Iberian inland waters (increase Freshwater ecosystems of 30% compared to previous reviews) whereas 24 additional species have uncertain establishment or Habitat native status. We found marked associations among taxonomic groups and their region of origin, intro- Iberian Peninsula duction pathway and main habitat used but less relationship between these three latter features.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Development of the Invader Ctenophore Mnemiopsis Leidyi, in the Black Sea and in Other Seas of the Mediterranean Basin
    Marine Biology '2001) 139: 431±445 DOI 10.1007/s002270100554 T.A. Shiganova á Z.A. Mirzoyan á E.A. Studenikina S.P. Volovik á I. Siokou-Frangou á S. Zervoudaki E.D. Christou á A.Y. Skirta á H.J. Dumont Population development of the invader ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi, in the Black Sea and in other seas of the Mediterranean basin Received: 18 December 2000 / Accepted: 2 February 2001 / Published online: 14 August 2001 Ó Springer-Verlag 2001 Abstract In the last two decades of the twentieth cen- M. leidyi, while they are suboptimal in the northern tury, the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi 'A. Agassiz) has Aegean Sea, where salinity and temperature are often invaded the Black, Azov, Marmara and Aegean Seas, too high. In the Black Sea the absence of gelatinous and and, recently, the Caspian Sea. Here, we compare its other predators led to an enormous ctenophore abun- spatial and temporal distribution, seasonal dynamics dance for a decade, but with the appearance of Beroe and the time and duration of reproduction. We also ovata in 1999, M. leidyi abundance greatly decreased. discuss factors that control its abundance throughout its Analysis of seasonal dynamics of M. leidyi in the Black invasive range and its eect on ecosystems. Observa- Sea and in other seas of the Mediterranean basin indi- tions are based on the long-term ®eld data collected by cates similarities in the timing of maximum abundance three research institutes. An analysis of the eects of and biomass, in spite of some dierences in the initia- temperature, salinity, prey 'zoo- and ichthyoplankton) tion and duration of reproduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Seasonal Succession of Zooplankton Populations in Two Dissimilar Marine Embayments on the Oregon Coast
    ANABSTRACTOF THE THESIS OF STEVEN THOMAS ZIMMERMAN for the DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (Name of student) (Degree) in OCEANOGRAPHY presented on ): (Major) (Date) TITLE: SEASONAL SUCCESSION OF ZOO PLANKTON POPULATIONS IN TWO DISSIMILAR MARINE EMBAYMENTS ON THE OREGON COAST Redacted for Privacy Abstract approved: H. F. Frolander Zooplankton tows and hydrographic observations were made in two bays on the Oregon coast.Five stations were sampled weekly in Yaquina Bay from May,1969through September,1970. Three stations were sampled weekly in Netarts Bay from October,1969 through January,1961. Zooplankton collections were made with a a Clarke-Bumpus sampler towed in a series of oblique steps. A#6 mesh (.239 mm aperature) net was used, A one year period from October,1969through September, 1970 was used to make a compar- ison of location and succession of zooplankton populations in the two bays. Yaquina Bay is a dredged estuary receiving seasonally high river flow. A salinity gradient is found year round from the mouth to the head end of the bay.During the winter, when rainfall is high, salinities at the head end are very low.Netarts Bay has no large river flow and salinities are never greatly decreased due to large tidal mixing.The flushing time of Netarts Bay is very short and tidal exchange is high throughout the bay,Yaquina Bay has a rela- tively longer flushing time and tidal exchange is not as high in the head end of the bay as in Netarts Bay. Because of these physical differences large indigenous popula- tions of the estuarine copepods Acartia tonsa, Acartia clausi, and Eurytemora americana were found in Yaquina Bay.Indigenous popu- lations made a much smaller contribution to Netarts Bay, and only Eurytemora americana developed a population which was apparently confined to the bay.
    [Show full text]