DOCSLIB.ORG

SC6.13 Planning Scheme Policy – Places of Significance

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SC6.13 Planning Scheme Policy – Places of Significance SC6.13 Planning scheme policy – Places of significance SC6.13.1 Purpose of the planning scheme policy (1) The purpose of this planning scheme policy is to provide guidance on preparing a statement of significance, impact assessment report, archaeological management plan, conservation management plan and an archival report. The planning scheme policy also contains the statements of cultural significance for each of the places of local significance which must be considered when assessing development applications of the place. SC6.13.2 Information Council may request SC6.13.2.1 Guidelines for preparing a Statement of significance (1) An appropriately qualified heritage consultant is to prepare the statement of significance. (2) A statement of cultural significance is to be prepared in accordance with the ICOMOS Burra Charter, 1999 and associated guidelines and the Queensland Government publication, using the criteria – a methodology. (3) The statement of cultural significance describes the importance of a place and the values that make it important. (4) A statement of cultural significance is to include the following: (a) Place details including place name, if the place is known by any other alternative; names and details if it listed on any other heritage registers; (b) Location details including the physical address, lot and plan details, coordinates and the specific heritage boundary details; (c) Statement/s of the cultural significance with specific reference to the cultural significance criteria; (d) A description of the thematic history and context of the place demonstrating an understanding of the history, key themes and fabric of the place within the context of its class; (e) A description of the place addressing the architectural description, locational description and the integrity and condition of the place; (f) Images and plans of the place both current and historical if available; (g) Details of the author/s, including qualifications and the date of the report. (h) Format of the statement of cultural significance is to follow the template in Table SC6.13.4.1a. Table SC6.13.2.1.a – Statement of cultural significance template Place Details Place Name Alternative Name Listings Qld Place ID *Only for State Heritage Places Place Location Address Lot/Plan Coordinates Heritage Boundary CairnsPlan 2016 Version 1.1 Schedule 6 │ Page 711 Place Details Cultural Significance Criterion Criterion Archaeological Potential History Historical Context Description Physical Description Images SC6.13.2.2 Guidelines for preparing an impact assessment report (1) An appropriately qualified heritage consultant is to prepare the impact assessment report. (2) The impact assessment report is to take into account existing documentation regarding the place. (3) An impact assessment report is to be prepared in accordance with the ICOMOS Burra Charter, 1999 and associated guidelines and the Queensland Government Guideline: Preparing a Heritage Impact Statement. (4) The impact assessment report provides information on how a proposed development will affect the values of a place and what measures are included in the development proposal to conserve the place. The amount of information required will depend on the scale and extent of the proposed development. (5) An impact assessment report is to include the following: (a) An analysis of the history and the physical fabric of the place within the context of its class; (b) An assessment of cultural significance of the place; (c) A description of the proposed development providing sufficient information to clearly distinguish the existing fabric, including photographs and plans of the existing site or area together with plans of the proposed development; (d) An assessment of the impact of the proposed development on the place including: (i) a description of how the development proposal will impact on the specific aspects of the significance of the place, (ii) how the fabric of the place would be impacted on and conserved; (iii) what works will be undertaken to adequately compensate for any loss of significant fabric or aspects of significance of the place. (e) List the changes required to the place as a consequence of the development and provide the following information about each change: (i) elements or aspects of the place affected by the change; (ii) the work required to effect the change; (iii) analysis of the impact of the change on the cultural significance of the place; (iv) assessment of potential for detrimental impact on the cultural significance; (v) if the work will directly affect a heritage element of the place, provide details of work methods; CairnsPlan 2016 Version 1.1 Schedule 6 │ Page 712 (vi) where the proposed change is assessed as having potential for detrimental impact, provide information about why the change is required, alternative solutions that were investigated, and what measures are included in the development to reduce detrimental impact that may result from the change. (f) Any other additional information that may assist in adequately assessing the significance of the site or area, including information drawn from a range of verifiable sources such as newspapers, government records, letters, books, photographs, maps or oral information which may help to establish the history of the site. Consideration of the historical context of the site or area shall be included to ascertain how its history contributes to an understanding of the site or area within broader historical events; (g) Photographs of the place; (h) Plans or some form of documentation that illustrates the development; (i) Details of the author/s, including qualifications and the date of the report; (j) References such as conservation policies, conservation management plan, condition report, and specialist consultants’ reports. SC6.13.2.3 Guidelines for preparing an impact assessment report on premises adjoining a state heritage place. (1) An appropriately qualified consultant is to prepare the impact assessment report. (2) The impact assessment report is to take into account existing documentation regarding the place. (3) An impact assessment report is to be prepared in accordance with the ICOMOS Burra Charter, 1999 and associated guidelines and the Queensland Government Guideline: Preparing a Heritage Impact Statement. (4) The impact assessment report provides information on how a proposed development on premises adjoining a state heritage place will affect the values of the place and its setting. The amount of information required will depend on the scale and extent of the proposed development. (5) An impact assessment report is to include the following: (a) An assessment of the impact the proposed development will have on the significance of the adjoining place; (b) Identify views of the place and assess which are significant and which are impacted; (c) Identify the visual and aesthetic qualities and characteristics of the place; (d) Identify whether the streetscape is significant and how the development impacts on the qualities of the streetscape; (e) Assess how the place and the development relate to one another, in terms of scale and height of the new building, choice of building materials, colours, fenestration patterns and setbacks; (f) Assess how the new building fits into the streetscape and responds to the prevailing architectural character and built environment of the street. SC6.13.2.4 Guidelines for preparing an archaeological management plan (1) An appropriately qualified heritage consultant is to prepare the archaeological management plan. (2) The archaeological management plan should take into account existing documentation regarding the place. CairnsPlan 2016 Version 1.1 Schedule 6 │ Page 713 (3) An archaeological management plan is to be prepared in accordance with the ICOMOS Burra Charter, 1999 and associated guidelines and the Queensland Government Guideline: Preparing Archaeological Management Plans in Queensland. (4) An archaeological management plan details how the archaeological issues will be managed. (5) An archaeological management plan is to include the following: (a) An archaeological research strategy, identifying the important research questions about the region’s history that need to be explored; (b) Methods, processes and procedures for future archaeological investigations that achieve the goals of the archaeological research strategy; (c) A strategy for handling archaeological discoveries made throughout the development project that are unrelated to those anticipated in the archaeological research strategy; (d) Induction training on archaeology which is to be provided to all project personnel; (e) All post-excavation activities such as artefact analysis, storage, curation and/or display; (f) A plan for the public dissemination of information including possible interpretation opportunities. SC6.13.2.5 Guidelines for preparing a conservation management plan (1) An appropriately qualified heritage consultant is to prepare the conservation management plan. (2) The conservation management plan should take into account existing documentation regarding the place. (3) A conservation management plan is to be prepared in accordance with ICOMOS Burra Charter, 1999 and associated guidelines. (4) A conservation management plan addresses the adverse impacts identified by an impact assessment report and develops conservation policies. (5) A conservation management plan is to include the following: (a) A description of the place; (b) A description of the heritage values; (c) An assessment
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Brass Bands of the World a Historical Directory
    Brass Bands of the World a historical directory Kurow Haka Brass Band, New Zealand, 1901 Gavin Holman January 2019 Introduction Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 6 Angola................................................................................................................................ 12 Australia – Australian Capital Territory ......................................................................... 13 Australia – New South Wales .......................................................................................... 14 Australia – Northern Territory ....................................................................................... 42 Australia – Queensland ................................................................................................... 43 Australia – South Australia ............................................................................................. 58 Australia – Tasmania ....................................................................................................... 68 Australia – Victoria .......................................................................................................... 73 Australia – Western Australia ....................................................................................... 101 Australia – other ............................................................................................................. 105 Austria ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Assembly Hansard 1950
    Queensland Parliamentary Debates [Hansard] Legislative Assembly WEDNESDAY, 18 OCTOBER 1950 Electronic reproduction of original hardcopy 726 Questions. [ASSEMBLY.] Questions. WEDNESDAY. 18 OCTOBER, 1950. was the opinion of the State Premiers that whilst the scheme had merit, it was a Commonwealth scheme and, therefore, the Mr. SPEAKER (Hon. J. H. Mann, Bris­ Commonwealth should bear all costs in bane) took the chair at 11 a.m,. connection with its implementation and operation. The Prime Minister thereupon QUESTIONS. stated that the contention of the State Premiers would be considered by the Com­ ERASURES FROM ELECTORAL ROLLS. monwealth Cabinet. The decision of the Commonwealth Government in regard t(} Mr. BROWN (Buranda) asked the this matter is now awaited.'' Premier- '' 1. Has hi& attention been drawn to the fact that representatives of certain organi­ 0VER'J'IME, RAILWAY DEPARTMENT. sations are visiting people in the suburbs Mr. NICKLIN (Landsboroug):l-;-Leader of Brisbane with a view to reporting to the of the Opposition) asked the Mm1ster for electoral authorities that some people should Transport- . be crossed off the roll~ ''What was the total cost of overhme ' '2. Are any of these people employed in the Railway Department for 1946-47, · by the State Electoral Office, and, ff so, 1947-48, and 1948-49, respectively~" how many are employed on such work and in what districts? Hon. J. E. DL"GGAN (Toowoomba) '' 3. Does he know that quite a number replied- ?f people, including old people, are receiv­ '' 1946-7, £428,812 j 1947-8, £460,591; mg notifications intimating that m1 1948-9, £900,719." objection has bPen received against their appearance on the roll and asking them to TOWNSVILLE-GIRU ROAD.
    [Show full text]
  • OBJECT BIOGRAPHY John Smith Murdoch's Drawing Instruments
    Landmarks: People and Places across Australia, a gallery bringing together over 1500 objects, explores the history of Australia since European settlement. OBJECT BIOGRAPHY John Smith Murdoch’s drawing instruments In 2009, the National Museum of Australia acquired a collection of drawing instruments including pens, compasses and rulers, housed in a leather-bound presentation case. On the front of the case is a silver plaque engraved with the following: ‘Presented to John S Murdoch, Architect / by a few friends on the occasion / of his leaving Elgin for Inverness. 18 Boxed set of drawing instruments November 1881.’ belonging to John Smith Murdoch, about 1881. Photo: Lannon Harley, National Museum of Australia. The case contains fifteen individual drawing instruments, which are stored in a moulded tray, lined with blue grosgrain and silk fabric, and a recessed storage compartment in the lid. The lid lining is stamped with ‘W H Harling, Mathematical Instrument Manufacturer, 40 Hatton Garden, London’ and the company’s crest. The recessed lid compartment contains a sector, protractor and parallel rule. In the 1600s there was a developed stylus that could draw a line with a specific width called a ruling pen. The stylus had two curved metal pieces, which were joined by a screw. Ink was trickled between the blades, from which it flowed evenly across the paper. The basic model was maintained for a long time, with minor modifications, until the 1930s when the German technical drawing pens came to the market. Many of the instruments were made by W H Harling, as indicated by the stamp. However, some of the instruments were made by J and W E Archbutt, Stanley and Elliot Brothers, suggesting that the case originally contained instruments from a variety of manufacturers or that Murdoch had replaced items over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Management Plan Final Report
    Australian War Memorial Heritage Management Plan Final Report Prepared by Godden Mackay Logan Heritage Consultants for the Australian War Memorial January 2011 Report Register The following report register documents the development and issue of the report entitled Australian War Memorial—Heritage Management Plan, undertaken by Godden Mackay Logan Pty Ltd in accordance with its quality management system. Godden Mackay Logan operates under a quality management system which has been certified as complying with the Australian/New Zealand Standard for quality management systems AS/NZS ISO 9001:2008. Job No. Issue No. Notes/Description Issue Date 06-0420 1 Draft Report July 2008 06-0420 2 Second Draft Report August 2008 06-0420 3 Third Draft Report September 2008 06-0420 4 Fourth Draft Report April 2009 06-0420 5 Final Draft Report (for public comment) September 2009 06-0420 6 Final Report January 2011 Contents Page Glossary of Terms Abbreviations Conservation Terms Sources Executive Summary......................................................................................................................................i How To Use This Report .............................................................................................................................v 1.0 Introduction............................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Background..........................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • AUSTRALIAN ROMANESQUE a History of Romanesque-Inspired Architecture in Australia by John W. East 2016
    AUSTRALIAN ROMANESQUE A History of Romanesque-Inspired Architecture in Australia by John W. East 2016 CONTENTS 1. Introduction . 1 2. The Romanesque Style . 4 3. Australian Romanesque: An Overview . 25 4. New South Wales and the Australian Capital Territory . 52 5. Victoria . 92 6. Queensland . 122 7. Western Australia . 138 8. South Australia . 156 9. Tasmania . 170 Chapter 1: Introduction In Australia there are four Catholic cathedrals designed in the Romanesque style (Canberra, Newcastle, Port Pirie and Geraldton) and one Anglican cathedral (Parramatta). These buildings are significant in their local communities, but the numbers of people who visit them each year are minuscule when compared with the numbers visiting Australia's most famous Romanesque building, the large Sydney retail complex known as the Queen Victoria Building. God and Mammon, and the Romanesque serves them both. Do those who come to pray in the cathedrals, and those who come to shop in the galleries of the QVB, take much notice of the architecture? Probably not, and yet the Romanesque is a style of considerable character, with a history stretching back to Antiquity. It was never extensively used in Australia, but there are nonetheless hundreds of buildings in the Romanesque style still standing in Australia's towns and cities. Perhaps it is time to start looking more closely at these buildings? They will not disappoint. The heyday of the Australian Romanesque occurred in the fifty years between 1890 and 1940, and it was largely a brick-based style. As it happens, those years also marked the zenith of craft brickwork in Australia, because it was only in the late nineteenth century that Australia began to produce high-quality, durable bricks in a wide range of colours.
    [Show full text]
  • Botanical Laboratories Canberra
    ArchivesACT Research Guide 1929 . ., CONI~11TTEE I WORI\S. REPORT ~ - , - ~ TOGETHER WITH " MINUTES OF EVIDEN CE RELATING TO THE PROPOSED ERECTION OF BOTANICAL LABORATORIES AT CANBERRA. I Presented pursuant to Sta.tute; ordered to be printed, lOth Septeniber, 1929. [Cost of Paper; Preparation, not given ; 835 copies; approximate cost of printing and publishing, £96. ] Printed and Published for the GovERNMENT of the CoMMONWEA LTH of AUSTRALIA by H. J. GREEN Government. Printer , Canberra . No. 57.- F.734.-PRrcE 2s. 8D. I J ArchivesACT Research Guide MEMBERS OF THE PARLIAMENTARY STANDING COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC WORKS. (Sixth Committee.) MALCOLM DuNCAN CAMERON, Esquire, M.P., Chairman. Senate. House of Representatives. Senator John Barnes. Percy Edmund Coleman, Esquire, M.P. Senator Herbert James Mockforcl Payne.* Josiah Francis, Esquire, M.P. Senator Matthew Reid. The Honorable Henry Gregory, M.P. Senator Burford Sampson.t r._ ' David Sydney Jackson, Esquire, M.P . David Charles McGrath, Esquire, M.P. .... • Resigned 14th August, 1929. t Appointed 14th August, 1929. INDEX. PAGE Report Ill Minutes of Evidence 1 EXTRACT FROM THE VOTES AND PROCEEDINGS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, No.17. Dated lith March, 1929. 6. PuBLIC WoRKS CoMMITTEE-REFERENCE oF WoRK-ERECTION OF LABORATORIES AND AN ADMINISTRATIVE BLOCK FOR THE DIVISION OF EcoNOMIC BoTANY, CANBERRA.-The Order of the Day having been read for the resumption of the debate upon the following motion of Mr. Aubrey Abbott (Minister for Home Affairs), That, in accordance with the provisions of the Commonwealth Public Works Committee Act 1913- 1921, the following proposed work be referred to the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Public Works for investigation and report, viz.
    [Show full text]
  • The Calendar University of Queensland
    The Calendar O F T H E University of Queensland PART I. FOR THE YEARS 193.2-1936 N O T E .— Every Student should provide himsell with the current issue of each part of the Calendar. Editor: T. E. JONES. B.A. The matter in this book has been wholly set up and printed by the Government Printer, Brisbane Year of Publication, 1932 BRISBANE: By Authority: F R E D E R I C K P H I L L I P S . Government Printer. Price 2/. QUEENSLAND U V . il Y LfoHARY TABLE OF CONTENTS. A TAGEV Table of Contents . - • • • • 3 Preface .. .. .. .. .. •• •• • • 5 The University of Queensland Act of 1909 . 9 Officers of the University— Senate .. • .• •• 22 Standing Committees . • • 23 Teaching Staff . • . • . 24 Faculties .. ' . .. • . 26 Administrative and Clerical Staffs . .. 27 Statutes of the University— Standing Committees . • • . 29- Faculties . .. .. .. • • . 31 Board of Faculties . 34 Boarding Places of Undergradutes . 38- Admission ad Eundern Gradum . 39 Matriculation— Arts . .. 42 Science . .. .. 43 Engineering . 44 Commercial Studies . 45 Agriculture . 45 Adult Matriculation . 46 Degree of Bachelor of Arts . 47 Degree of Bachelor of Science . 54 Degree of Bachelor of Science in Industrial Chemistry 60 Degree of Bachelor of Engineering . 68 Degree of Bachelor of Commerce . 69' Degree of Bachelor of Science in Agriculture . 73 Diploma in Mechanical and Electrical Engineering . 76 Diploma for Journalism . .. 80- Commerce Certificate and Diploma in Commerce . 82 Master of Arts .. .. .. .. 84 Master of Science . .. 85 Master of Engineering . 86 Master of Commerce . 88 Degree of Doctor of Science . 88 Robert Philp Scholarship . 89 Sir Thomas Mcllwraith Scholarships . 90 Election of Members of Senate .
    [Show full text]
  • WET TROPICS TOUR GUIDES WORKSHOP Atherton Tablelands Region | 15-16 March, 2013
    WET TROPICS TOUR GUIDES WORKSHOP Atherton Tablelands Region | 15-16 March, 2013 You are invited to participate in our first Wet Tropics Tour Guides Workshop for 2013, being held in the Atherton Tablelands Region 15-16 March 2013. This two day event will welcome Tour Guides, locals, tourism businesses, land managers, traditional owners, researchers and government agency representatives for valuable information sharing and network building. Our field trips will provide insights into natural habitats, research sites and tourism features and we’ll enjoy some fun times together in our spectacular back yard. THE WET TROPICS TOUR GUIDE PROGRAM This workshop is a part of the Wet Tropics Tour Guide Program which provides professional development opportunities for interpreters of the Wet Tropics. Other components include: The online Wet Tropics Tour Guide Course, incorporating accredited units in natural landscapes, cultural elements and commentary delivery; Opportunity to join our growing Facebook community and to share your amazing experiences; Gain the advantage by having access to a new bank of resources on the Wet Tropics website. The program will deliver field workshops in March/April and November/December each year, research information sessions and professional development opportunities to link our tourism and scientific communities and enhance our National Landscape’s guiding standards. Award winning Savannah Guides Limited and Industry Accreditation are working with Wet Tropics Management Authority to develop the Wet Tropics Tour Guide Program. For more information visit www.wettropics.gov.au/tour-guide-training WORKSHOP PROGRAM OVERVIEW Arrival, Accommodation and Transport Participants should arrange their own accommodation for Thursday 14 and/or Friday 15 March as required.
    [Show full text]
  • (EPM) and Mining Leases (ML) in Queensland
    List of Companies holding Current Exploration Permits for Minerals (EPM) and Mining Leases (ML) in Queensland Type of Tenure Tenure Number Tenure Status Date of Application Date Granted $Uccess Pty Ltd ML 1449 GRANTED June 29, 1982 May 24, 1984 (As Executor Of The Will) Lewis William Reinhold And Paul John Bodimeade ML 1869 GRANTED November 28, 1980 December 05, 1985 A Cap Resources Limited EPM 9934 GRANTED January 14, 1994 March 03, 1994 A.C.N. 605 294 228 Pty Ltd EPM 25926 GRANTED April 17, 2015 November 24, 2015 Aberdare Collieries Proprietary Limited ML 50074 GRANTED March 26, 1993 February 03, 2000 Abx3 Pty Ltd EPM 25146 GRANTED January 2, 2013 January 07, 2014 EPM 25787 GRANTED October 3, 2014 April 08, 2015 EPM 17790 GRANTED August 20, 2008 April 28, 2009 EPM 19390 GRANTED October 12, 2011 October 02, 2013 EPM 19427 GRANTED November 1, 2011 July 28, 2015 EPM 18772 GRANTED July 15, 2010 January 31, 2011 EPM 18014 GRANTED February 24, 2009 October 09, 2009 EPM 17831 GRANTED September 16, 2008 February 25, 2009 EPM 17830 GRANTED September 16, 2008 February 25, 2009 Acacia Coal Limited ML 700005 APPLICATION March 27, 2015 Acapulco Mining Pty Ltd EPM 25245 GRANTED April 15, 2013 January 22, 2015 EPM 19410 GRANTED October 19, 2011 June 17, 2014 Acc Ecominerals Limited EPM 18242 GRANTED August 13, 2009 December 17, 2014 Aci Operations Pty Ltd ML 1124 GRANTED January 13, 1967 April 24, 1975 ML 7064 GRANTED February 28, 1990 May 31, 2001 Acn 132 668 314 Pty Ltd EPM 25239 GRANTED April 9, 2013 March 03, 2014 EPM 25868 APPLICATION January
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Growth Strategy 2031 Integrated Transport Study April 2011 DELIBERATELY LEFT BLANK Table of Contents
    Fraser Coast Regional Council Sustainable Growth Strategy 2031 Integrated Transport Study April 2011 DELIBERATELY LEFT BLANK Table of Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background...................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Objectives of the Integrated Transport Study .................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Scope of this report .......................................................................................................................................................................... 2 2. Methodology .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 2.1 Methodology..................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 3. Literature review......................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 3.1 Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Assembly Hansard 1961
    Queensland Parliamentary Debates [Hansard] Legislative Assembly THURSDAY, 21 SEPTEMBER 1961 Electronic reproduction of original hardcopy Questions [21 SEPTEMBER] Questions 437 vehicle transporting oil in bulk, the sum of threepence by the weight of the oil carried in the bulk tank expressed in tons (includ­ ing fractions of tons expressed in hundred­ weight) and by the number of road miles on which such oil is carried on the vehicle pursuant to a permit. (ii) A charge under 'The Roads (Contribution to Maintenance) Acts, 1957 to 1958,' at the rate of one-third of a penny per ton of the sum of-(a) The tare weight of the vehicle; and (b) Forty per centum of the load capacity of the vehicle, per mile of public highway along which the vehicle travels. (b) A charge under 'The Roads (Contribution to Main­ tenance) Acts, 1957 to 1958,' at the rate of one-third of a penny per ton of the sum of-(a) The tare weight of the vehicle; and (b) Forty per centum of the load capacity of the vehicle, per mile of public highway along which the vehicle travels." "(2) (i) A permit fee under 'The State Transport Act of 1960' calculated by multiplying in respect of each and every vehicle transporting petroleum products in packages the sum of three pence by the load capacity of the vehicle expressed in tons (including fractions of tons to the nearest hundredweight) and by the number of road miles on which such petroleum products in packages are carried on the vehicle pursuant to a permit.
    [Show full text]
  • Hon Bob Katter – Federal Member for Kennedy
    ADVERTISMENT Hon Bob Katter – Federal Member for Kennedy FUNDING 44TH PARLIAMENT – KENNEDY ELECTORATE • $5bn Northern Australia Fund • $150m – Southern Cairns upgrade between • $1,518,000 - Cassowary Coast Regional Council • $509.5m National Water Infrastructure Fund Sheehy Road and Ray Jones Drive (Benefiting - Victory Creek Bridge, Jubilee Road, Daradgee • $1,599,268 – Heavy Vehicle Rest Areas – commuters in and out of Cairns) Landsborough Hwy (Cloncurry to Morven) • $139.2m –Bruce Highway – Ingham - • $170,000 - Mareeba Shire Council - • $8,110,691 – Heavy Vehicle Rest Areas - construction of a new higher-level section of Springmount Road - Oakey Creek Bridge Flinders Highway (Townsville to Cloncurry) highway from Cattle Creek to Toobanna, Renewal • $999,580 – Heavy Vehicle Rest Area and including a new, higher-level, 160m-long bridge • $3,100,000 – Cassowary Coast Regional Council breakdown pad – Nth Mt Isa over Cattle Creek; upgrade of the existing - Deep Creek Bridge, Bartle Frere Road, • $430,619 – Upgrade Heavy Vehicle Rest Area highway from just south of Pennas Road and • $680,000 – Townsville City Council - and breakdown pad – Sth Mt Isa Frances Creek Rollingstone Bridge • Airport Upgrade Federal Funding • $40m – Bruce Highway– Pavement Widening – Road to Recovery: between Cairns & Ingham o $42,500 - Richmond Shire Council (Richmond • $3,580,036 - Boulia Shire Council Airport) • $40m - improve the flood immunity of the • $1,935,754 - Burke Shire Council Bruce Highway at the Gairloch Floodway, north o $85,654 - Carpentaria Shire
    [Show full text]