DOCSLIB.ORG

Preliminary Ecological Appraisal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Preliminary Ecological Appraisal Preliminary Ecological Appraisal Saxon Brickworks, Peterborough Road, Whittlesey Project No: HSPCo04 Client: Johnsons Aggregates Date: 15/02/2021 HSPCo04 / Saxon Brickworks, Peterborough Road, Whittlesey Preliminary Ecological Appraisal, Issue 1 ISSUE RECORD Client name Johnsons Aggregates Project name Saxon Brickworks, Peterborough Road, Whittlesey Project number HSPCo04 Report title Preliminary Ecological Appraisal Issue number 1 Date 15/02/2021 Written by Jessica Eades BSc (Hons), MCIEEM Technical Director Checked by Chloe Pritchard BSc (Hons) MCIEEM Principal Ecologist Approved by Jonathan Brickland BSc (Hons) MSc CEnv MCIEEM Director The information and advice contained in this report has been prepared and provided in accordance with the Chartered Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management’s Code of Professional Conduct. We confirm that the opinions expressed are our true and professional bona fide opinions. Peak Ecology is accredited under ISO9001 and as such this report follows the styles and formatting template set out within our Quality Management Form ISO9001 QMF 32 Issue 1 Reviewed 04/03/2016 Peak Ecology Limited Arden House Deepdale Business Park Bakewell Derbyshire DE45 1GT 01629 812511 www.peakecology.co.uk Page i HSPCo04 / Saxon Brickworks, Peterborough Road, Whittlesey Preliminary Ecological Appraisal, Issue 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Overview This report has been prepared by Peak Ecology Ltd on behalf of Johnsons Aggregates. Peak Ecology Limited was instructed on 28th January 2021 via HSP Consulting on behalf of Johnsons Aggregates to provide ecological advice after receiving a scoping opinion from Cambridgeshire County Council. The scoping opinion related to a planning application for the proposed importation, storage, processing (including use of trommel), picking and recycling of up to 500,000 Tonnes per annum (TPA) Of Incinerator Bottom Ash (IBA) and construction and demolition (C&D) waste, for exportation for use ss Incinerator Bottom Ash Secondary Aggregates (IBAA) at Saxon Brickworks, Peterborough Road, Whittlesey, Cambridgeshire, PE7 1PJ. The site comprises an approximately 5.10ha area of land situated between Peterborough and Whittlesey (central grid reference: TL 2546 9714) on the southern side of the A605 (Peterborough Road) in a former quarried area. Designated Sites Three international designated sites fall within the 10km search radius around the study area. The study area falls within the Nene Washes SSSI Impact Risk Zone and also an area highlighted by Natural England as the Nene Washes Goose & Swan Functional Land Impact Risk Zone within City of Peterborough. Four non-statutory designated sites: County Wildlife Sites (CWS) have been identified within the 2km study area all situated to the north of the study area. The access road from the A605 into the proposed processing facility lies within a 200m buffer zone established for the Kings Dyke Nature Reserve. Habitats Much of the study area is of low ecological value due to the extent of hardstanding, buildings and disturbed bare ground. However, the vegetated habitats as outlined below, offer moderate to good ecological value. All areas of woodland appear to be retained within the proposed development, whilst there will be a loss of scrub and tall ruderal habitat. The proposed development will result in the loss of approximately 0.47ha of ephemeral / short perennial vegetation considered highly likely to qualify as the UK BAP and local priority habitat “open mosaic habitat on previously disturbed ground”, although the wider area of this habitat will remain intact. At the time of writing, it is assumed that all ditches and associated marginal and inundation vegetation are to be retained within the proposed development. Peak Ecology Page ii 15/02/2021 HSPCo04 / Saxon Brickworks, Peterborough Road, Whittlesey Preliminary Ecological Appraisal, Issue 1 Protected Species Vegetated areas of the site have the potential to support the following protected and priority species; • Amphibians – including great crested newt; • Badger; • Water vole; • Breeding birds; and • Reptiles. Impacts to bats were considered, but have been considered negligible for roosting, foraging and commuting habitats. Implications and Recommendations The proposals indicate no soft landscaping, so all habitat loss is assumed to be replaced with hard surfaces. There will be net loss of habitat associated with this proposed development. Increased vehicle movement associated with the proposals may have an adverse impact on woodland bird species along the access route from the A605 into the processing facility. Much of the development of the site will have negligible impact on ecology at the site level due to the dominance of hard standing, building and disturbed bare ground. This area in latter parts of the report is referred to as the Phase 1 development area, with vegetated areas with higher ecological value and likely to support protected and priority species referred to as the Phase 2 development area. A number of additional ecological surveys are recommended to further assess impacts of the proposed Phase 2 development area as outlined in Figure 8. These surveys are designed to further refine recommendations outlined later within this report; • Great crested newt – eDNA survey; • Water Vole Survey; and • Biodiversity Net Gain Calculations. A number of reasonable avoidance measures, mitigation and compensation measures have been included within the report and where appropriate, worst case scenarios have been outlined to inform an appropriate way forward to minimise impacts to protected and priority species and habitats. Peak Ecology Page iii 15/02/2021 HSPCo04 / Saxon Brickworks, Peterborough Road, Whittlesey Preliminary Ecological Appraisal, Issue 1 CONTENTS PAGE 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Scope of Report ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Site Description ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Zone of Influence .......................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Planning Context ........................................................................................................................... 2 2 METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Desk Study .................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Phase 1 Habitat Survey ................................................................................................................ 4 2.3 Protected and Priority Species ..................................................................................................... 5 2.4 Limitations ..................................................................................................................................... 5 3 RESULTS ..................................................................................................................................... 8 3.1 Desk Study .................................................................................................................................... 8 3.2 Phase 1 Habitat Survey .............................................................................................................. 18 3.3 Protected and Priority Species ................................................................................................... 23 4 EVALUATION OF FEATURES WITHIN THE STUDY AREA ..................................................... 31 4.1 Designated sites ......................................................................................................................... 31 4.1 Habitats & Botanical Interest ...................................................................................................... 31 4.1 Protected and Priority Species ................................................................................................... 33 5 ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS .................................................................................................... 36 5.1 Development Proposals .............................................................................................................. 36 5.2 Potential Impacts associated with the proposals ........................................................................ 36 5.1 Designated Sites ......................................................................................................................... 38 5.2 Summary of study area assessment .......................................................................................... 39 5.1 Habitats & Botanical Interest ...................................................................................................... 41 5.2 Protected and Priority Species ................................................................................................... 41 6 RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................................................... 46 6.1 Further Survey / assessment ...................................................................................................... 46 6.2 Mitigation/Compensation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Peterborough's Green Infrastructure & Biodiversity Supplementary
    Peterborough’s Green Infrastructure & Biodiversity Supplementary Planning Document Positive Planning for the Natural Environment Consultation Draft January 2018 297 Preface How to make comments on this Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) We welcome your comments and views on the content of this draft SPD. It is being made available for a xxxx week public consultation. The consultation starts at on XX 2018 and closes on XX xxx 2018. The SPD can be viewed at www.peterborough.gov.uk/LocalPlan.There are several ways that you can comment on the SPD. Comments can be made by email to: [email protected] or by post to: Peterborough Green Infrastructure and Biodiversity Draft SPD Consultation Sustainable Growth Strategy Peterborough City Council Town Hall Bridge Street Peterborough PE1 1HF All responses must be received by XX xxxx 2018. All comments received will be taken into consideration by the council before a final SPD is adopted later in 2018. 2 298 Contents 1 Introduction 4 Purpose, Status, Structure and Content of the SPD 4 Collaborative working 4 Definitions 5 Benefits of GI 5 Who should think about GI & Biodiversity 7 2 Setting the Scene 8 Background to developing the SPD 8 Policy and Legislation 8 3 Peterborough's Approach to Green Infrastructure and Biodiversity 11 Current Situation 11 Vision 12 Key GI Focus Areas 14 4 Making It Happen - GI Delivery 23 Priority GI Projects 23 Governance 23 Funding 23 5 Integrating GI and Biodiversity with Sustainable Development 24 Recommended Approach to Biodiversity for all Planning
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Whittlesey Neighbourhood Plan This Determination Statement
    24 August 2021 Strategic Environmental Assessment Determination Statement: Draft Whittlesey Neighbourhood Plan This determination statement has been produced by Fenland District Council (FDC) as “responsible authority”, to meet the requirements of Regulation 9 of the Environmental Assessment of Plans and Programmes Regulations 2004. This Determination Statement forms a Submission Document for the purposes of neighbourhood planning, as required by The Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012 (as amended) (reg. 15(e)(ii)). A Screening Assessment was undertaken by FDC during the preparation of the draft Whittlesey Neighbourhood Plan. As part of this assessment, FDC consulted the statutory bodies. The SEA Screening Report follows this Determination Statement. The Screening Report examines the strategic policy and environmental context relevant to Whittlesey, and presents the findings of the screening assessment. The report identifies that the draft Whittlesey Neighbourhood Plan does not seek to increase the overall quantum of growth beyond that which has already been permitted through the planning system. Other policies generally accord with the adopted Local Plan, the potential environmental effects of which were duly assessed through the plan-making process. The Screening Report was sent to consultation bodies for comment (13 July to 23 August 2021). Responses were received from Environment Agency, Historic England and Natural England. Through its response to the draft Screening Report consultation, Historic England concurred with the Council that the preparation of a Strategic Environmental Assessment is not required. Natural England confirmed it agrees with the report’s conclusions that the Whittlesey Neighbourhood Plan would not be likely to result in a significant effect on any European Site, either alone or in combination and therefore no further assessment work is required.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridgeshire ‘Flood & Water Supplementary Planning Document (SPD)
    Cambridgeshire ‘Flood & Water Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) Habitats Regulations Assessment Cambridgeshire County Council, Cambridge City Council, East Cambridgeshire District Council, Fenland District Council, Huntingdonshire District Council, and South Cambridgeshire District Council August 2015 1 The need for an assessment The Cambridgeshire ‘Flood and Water’ Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) is being developed to provide guidance on flood risk and water management planning matters across Cambridgeshire. The local planning authorities (LPAs) for Cambridge City Council, East Cambridgeshire District Council, Fenland District Council, Huntingdonshire District Council and South Cambridgeshire District Council are producing this guidance jointly with Cambridgeshire County Council to provide a ‘countywide’ approach to development, specifically on flooding and water management (e.g. SuDS). All LPAs are committed to adopting the SPD following public consultation of the document. The SPD is subject to public consultation, which will be carried out during September and October 2015. It has been identified that an assessment is required in accordance with the Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC and Habitats Regulations 1994. These require a Habitats Regulations Assessment to be carried out for the SPD in order to determine any likely significant effects that it might have on the integrity of European nature conservation sites. These are designated as either Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) or Special Protection Areas (SPAs). Collectively the sites form part of a European network of protected areas known as Natura 2000, and Ramsar sites. The government requires that Ramsar sites are afforded the same level of protection as European sites. The sites in Cambridgeshire are set out in Appendix A. Advice from Natural England, following comments on an initial draft of this document, has been used to inform this assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • App C Corridor Assessment PAS.Pdf
    England's Economic Heartland ASSESSMENT OF STRATEGIC CORRIDORS Appendix C to the ISA JUNE 2020 PUBLIC England's Economic Heartland ASSESSMENT OF STRATEGIC CORRIDORS Appendix C to the ISA TYPE OF DOCUMENT (VERSION) PUBLIC PROJECT NO. 70068182 DATE: JUNE 2020 WSP The Forum Barnfield Road Exeter, Devon EX1 1QR Phone: +44 1392 229 700 Fax: +44 1392 229 701 WSP.com PUBLIC QUALITY CONTROL Issue/revision First issue Revision 1 Revision 2 Revision 3 Revision 4 Remarks Sample Draft Draft For client Final Review Final for review Consultation Date April 2020 May 2020 May 2020 May 2020 June 2020 Prepared by Katie Dean Katie Dean Katie Dean Katie Dean Katie Dean Signature Checked by Sally Newbold Sophie Rice Sophie Rice Sophie Rice Sally Newbold Signature Authorised by Sally Newbold Sally Newbold Sally Newbold Ursula Stevenson Signature Project number 70068182 70068182 70068182 70068182 70068182 Report number 01 02 03 04 05 File reference ASSESSMENT OF STRATEGIC CORRIDORS PUBLIC | WSP Project No.: 70068182 June 2020 England's Economic Heartland CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 8 1.1 INTRODUCTION 8 1.2 CORRIDOR SHORTLIST 8 1.3 ASSESSMENT APPROACH 9 2 ASSESSMENT FINDINGS 16 2.1 INTRODUCTION 16 2.2 OXFORDSHIRE - MILTON KEYNES CONNECTIVITY STUDY AREA 18 OVERVIEW 18 KEY SUSTAINABILITY FEATURES 19 2.3 NORTH - SOUTH CONNECTIONS (A1 REGION) 20 OVERVIEW 20 KEY SUSTAINABILITY FEATURES 21 2.4 LUTON – BEDFORD – NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 22 OVERVIEW 22 KEY SUSTAINABILITY FEATURES 23 2.5 OXFORD TO SWINDON/SOUTH WEST 24 OVERVIEW 24 KEY SUSTAINABILITY FEATURES 25 2.6 (LONDON) - BUCKINGHAMSHIRE-MILTON
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Cabinet, 20/04/2017 19:00
    A meeting of the CABINET will be held in CIVIC SUITE 0.1A, PATHFINDER HOUSE, ST MARY'S STREET, HUNTINGDON, PE29 3TN on THURSDAY, 20 APRIL 2017 at 7:00 PM and you are requested to attend for the transaction of the following business:- Contact (01480) APOLOGIES 1. MINUTES (Pages 5 - 8) To approve as a correct record the Minutes of the meeting held on A Roberts 16th March 2017. 388015 2. MEMBERS' INTERESTS To receive from Members declarations as to disclosable pecuniary and other interests in relation to any Agenda item. 3. HUNTINGDONSHIRE LOCAL PLAN TO 2036 QUARTERLY UPDATE AND INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING UPDATE (Pages 9 - 18) To consider a report by the Head of Development on progress of the C Kerr Local Plan preparation and on the main elements of the evidence 388430 base currently under preparation. 4. CAMBRIDGESHIRE FLOOD AND WATER SUPPLEMENTARY PLANNING DOCUMENT (Pages 19 - 284) To consider a report by the Planning Service Manager to which is J Campbell attached the draft Cambridgeshire Flood and Water Supplementary 388432 Planning Document. 5. A428 BLACK CAT TO CAXTON GIBBET IMPROVEMENTS (Pages 285 - 294) To consider a report by the Head of Development on the proposed C Kerr upgrading of the A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet. 388430 S Bell 388387 6. FINDINGS OF THE CCTV TASK AND FINISH GROUP (Pages 295 - 300) To consider a report by the Overview and Scrutiny Panel A Green (Communities and Environment) on the findings of a study on CCTV. 388008 7. STRATEGIC REVIEW OF PARKING - PROJECT OVERVIEW (Pages 301 - 310) To consider a report by the Head of Operations on the terms of the G McDowell Strategic Review of Parking.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridgeshire Local Transport Plan 2011-2031
    Cambridgeshire Local Transport Plan 2011-2031 Policies and Strategy July 2015 Graham Hughes Executive Director, Economy, Transport and Environment Cambridgeshire County Council Shire Hall Castle Hill Cambridge CB3 0AP www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk Third Cambridgeshire Local Transport Plan 2011-2031 LTP: Policies and Strategy document version 1.2.1, July 2015 For information on the review and update of this document since it was first adopted in March 2011, see the LTP: Change Log at http://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/ltp. Third Cambridgeshire LTP 2011-2031: Policies and Strategy July 2015 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY III 1. INTRODUCTION 1-1 THE SCOPE OF THE LTP 1-2 THE ISSUES 1-7 THE STRATEGY 1-11 THE LTP SUITE OF DOCUMENTS 1-11 2. OBJECTIVES, INDICATORS AND TARGETS 2-1 CAMBRIDGESHIRE LTP OBJECTIVES 2-1 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT AND LOCAL TRANSPORT PLAN INDICATORS 2-4 ROAD SAFETY INDICATORS 2-6 TRENDS IN TRAVEL INDICATORS 2-9 ENVIRONMENT INDICATORS 2-15 ROAD AND FOOTWAY CONDITION INDICATORS 2-18 3. PROBLEMS AND CHALLENGES 3-1 INTRODUCTION 3-1 LTP OBJECTIVES 1 AND 4 3-2 LTP OBJECTIVE 2 3-7 LTP OBJECTIVE 3 3-10 LTP OBJECTIVE 5 3-13 CONCLUSION 3-18 4. STRATEGY – MEETING THE CHALLENGES 4-1 INTRODUCTION 4-1 OUR OVERARCHING STRATEGY 4-1 CHALLENGE 1: IMPROVING THE RELIABILITY OF JOURNEY TIMES BY MANAGING DEMAND FOR ROAD SPACE, WHERE APPROPRIATE AND MAXIMISING CAPACITY AND EFFICIENCY OF THE EXISTING NETWORK 4-7 CHALLENGE 2: REDUCING THE LENGTH OF THE COMMUTE AND THE NEED TO TRAVEL BY PRIVATE CAR 4-22 CHALLENGE 3: MAKING SUSTAINABLE MODES OF TRANSPORT A
    [Show full text]
  • 88. Bedfordshire and Cambridgeshire Claylands Area Profile: Supporting Documents
    National Character 88. Bedfordshire and Cambridgeshire Claylands Area profile: Supporting documents www.naturalengland.org.uk 1 National Character 88. Bedfordshire and Cambridgeshire Claylands Area profile: Supporting documents Introduction National Character Areas map As part of Natural England’s responsibilities as set out in the Natural Environment White Paper,1 Biodiversity 20202 and the European Landscape Convention,3 we are revising profiles for England’s 159 National Character Areas North (NCAs). These are areas that share similar landscape characteristics, and which East follow natural lines in the landscape rather than administrative boundaries, making them a good decision-making framework for the natural environment. Yorkshire & The North Humber NCA profiles are guidance documents which can help communities to inform West their decision-making about the places that they live in and care for. The information they contain will support the planning of conservation initiatives at a East landscape scale, inform the delivery of Nature Improvement Areas and encourage Midlands broader partnership working through Local Nature Partnerships. The profiles will West also help to inform choices about how land is managed and can change. Midlands East of Each profile includes a description of the natural and cultural features England that shape our landscapes, how the landscape has changed over time, the current key drivers for ongoing change, and a broad analysis of each London area’s characteristics and ecosystem services. Statements of Environmental South East Opportunity (SEOs) are suggested, which draw on this integrated information. South West The SEOs offer guidance on the critical issues, which could help to achieve sustainable growth and a more secure environmental future.
    [Show full text]
  • A47 Wansford to Sutton EIA Scoping Report
    A47 Wansford to Sutton EIA Scoping Report PINS project reference number: TR010039 Highways England document reference: HEWNSFRD-MMSJV-EGN-000-RP-LX-00002 Date: February 2018 Version: P02 A47 Wansford to Sutton Document Control Document Title EIA Scoping Report Originator Ben O’Hickey, Mott MacDonald Sweco Joint Venture Checker Jacqueline Fookes, Mott MacDonald Sweco Joint Venture Approver Giles Hewson, Mott MacDonald Sweco Joint Venture Authoriser Stefan Craciun, Mott MacDonald Sweco Joint Venture Distribution The Planning Inspectorate Document Status Final Revision History Version Date Description Author P01 December 2017 First Draft B. O’Hickey P02 February 2018 Final B. O’Hickey Reviewer List Name Role Jose Antonio Garvi- Senior Environmental Advisor, Highways England Serrano Alan Nettey Development Consent Order and Statutory Process Manager, Highways England Aaron Douglas Project Manager, Highways England Gavin Williams Geotechnical Advisor, Highways England Approvals Name Signature Title Date of Version Issue Guy Lewis Programme Leader The original format of this document is copyright to the Highways England. EIA Scoping Report Page 2 of 177 A47 Wansford to Sutton Table of Contents 1 Introduction 7 1.1 Purpose of the Report 7 1.2 Proposed Scheme Location 7 1.3 Proposed Scheme Overview 8 1.4 Approach to EIA Scoping 8 1.5 Legislative Context and the need for Environmental Impact Assessment 9 1.6 Approach to Assessment 10 1.7 Population and Human Health 12 1.8 Major Accidents and Disasters 13 1.9 Heat and Radiation 14 1.10 Transboundary
    [Show full text]
  • Bury Neighbourhood Plan HRA Screening
    Bury Village Neighbourhood Plan 2019-2036 HRA Screening Request September 2019 Bury Village Neighbourhood Plan – HRA Screening Request Bury Village Neighbourhood Plan 2019-2036 HRA Screening Request – September 2019 Submission of the Neighbourhood Plan in accordance with Regulation 15 of Neighbourhood Planning Regulations 2012 The Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group on behalf of Bury Parish Council: Councillor Mike Tew (Lead) John Arkle Peter Brindley David Bufton Fiona Cameron Ann Cuthbert Councillor Peter Hazell Jo McGlashan Jeremy Mumford Councillor John Prestage Lisa Schiavo Alison Seery Councillor David Wakefield Rachel White Sue Williams The Parish Council received professional planning support from NEIGHBOURHOOD-PLAN.CO.UK during the production of this Neighbourhood Plan. NEIGHBOURHOOD-PLAN.CO.UK For any query relating to the Neighbourhood Plan contact: Charlotte Copley Clerk to Bury Parish Council Tel: 07540 294317 Email: [email protected] https://buryparishcouncil.co.uk/index.php/neighbourhood-plan/ 2 Bury Village Neighbourhood Plan – HRA Screening Request Bury Village Neighbourhood Plan 2019-2036 The Neighbourhood Plan Supporting Documents Basic Consultation SEA Screening Conditions Statement Statement Local Green Settlement Designated HRA Spaces Boundary Area Plan Screening Evidence Methodology Other Local Evidence: Bury Housing Needs Survey 3 Bury Village Neighbourhood Plan – HRA Screening Request Contents Introduction Page 5 The Development Plan Page 8 Habitats Regulations Assessment Page 9 Consultation and Conclusion Page 11 Appendix One: Fenland SAC and Woodwalton Fen Ramsar Site Page 13 4 Bury Village Neighbourhood Plan – HRA Screening Request Introduction 1. Bury Parish Council have undertaken this Habitats Regulation Assessment Screening Request. It is the role of Huntingdonshire District Council as the Local Planning Authority (LPA) to undertake a screening of the Neighbourhood Plan under the Habitats Regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Screening Report September 2013 FENLAND CORE STRATEGY (‘PROPOSED SUBMISSION’)
    Habitats Regulations Assessment Screening Report September 2013 FENLAND CORE STRATEGY (‘PROPOSED SUBMISSION’) HABITATS REGULATIONS ASSESSMENT SCREENING REPORT September 2013 (Update of the July 2011, July 2012 and February 2013 Screening Reports) Fenland CS HRA Screening Report Sept 2013 1 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 3 The Requirement To Undertake Habitats Regulations Assessment Of Development Plans Stages of the Habitats Regulations Assessment 2. Methodology 5 Screening Assessment Tasks 3. Identification of Sites 6 N2k Sites To Be Considered N2k Site Baseline Information N2K Maps 4. Vulnerabilities of Qualifying Features 11 Vulnerabilities Sites and Their Vulnerabilities 5. Key Components of the Emerging Fenland Core Strategy 19 Introduction Summary of Policies 6. Assessment of the Key Components of the Core Strategy 21 Introduction Likelihood of individual policies resulting in significant effects on N2K sites Summary of likelihood of significant effects on N2K sites 7. Other Relevant Plans And Projects 26 Other Relevant Plans and Projects 8. Conclusions And Next Steps 27 Screening Assessment Of Spatial Options For Growth Screening Assessment Of Spatially Generic Core Strategy Policies Next Steps APPENDICES APPENDIX 1: Screening matrix Fenland CS HRA Screening Report Sept 2013 2 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. This report is a Stage 1 (Screening) of the Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA) for the Proposed Submission Fenland Core Strategy Development Plan Document (DPD). This HRA Screening Report sets out the findings of the Screening stage to determine whether the Core Strategy, either alone or in combination with other plans or projects, is likely to have a significant adverse effect on a Natura 2000 site, and thus whether full Appropriate Assessment (Stage 2 of HRA) is required.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitats Regulations Assessment 2017
    Huntingdonshire’s Local Plan to 2036 - Habitats Regulations Assessment 2017 Bodsey Ecology Limited Addendum to Final Report 16th November 2017 www.bodseyecology.co.uk Contact: Dr.P.D.Carey, Bodsey Ecology Limited, 4 Bodsey Cottages, Bodsey Toll Road, Ramsey, Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire, PE26 2XH. Tel 01487 813432. Mobile 0786 7618141. E-mail [email protected] HLP2036 HRA Addendum 16/11/2017 Contents Disclaimer ....................................................................................................................................................... 3 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................ 4 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 5 1.1 Background .................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 This Report ..................................................................................................................................... 5 2 Screening of the policies for HLP2036 ................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Changes to HLP2036 ..................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Screening the policies to include the new allocations ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority Local Transport Plan SEA - Environmental Report Appendix H - LTP Project Assessments
    Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority Local Transport Plan SEA - Environmental Report Appendix H - LTP Project Assessments May 2019 Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority Mott MacDonald 22 Station Road Cambridge CB1 2JD United Kingdom T +44 (0)1223 463500 F +44 (0)1223 461007 mottmac.com Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority Cambridgeshire and 402819 001 B Peterborough Combined Mott MacDonald Authority Local Transport Plan SEA - Environmental Report Appendix H - LTP Project Assessments May 2019 Mott MacDonald Limited. Registered in England and Wales no. 1243967. Registered office: Mott MacDonald House, 8-10 Sydenham Road, Croydon CR0 2EE, Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority United Kingdom Mott MacDonald | Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority Local Transport Plan SEA - Environmental Report Appendix H - LTP Project Assessments Issue and Revision Record Revision Date Originator Checker Approver Description A 07.05.19 S Robinson N Levy S Price Issue for client comment J Hitchcock B 16.05.19 S Robinson N Levy J Hitchcock Second issue for comment Document reference: 402819 | 001 | B Information class: Standard This document is issued for the party which commissioned it and for specific purposes connected with the above- captioned project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or used for any other purpose. We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this document being relied upon by any other party, or being used for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties. This document contains confidential information and proprietary intellectual property.
    [Show full text]