The South China Sea

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The South China Sea Nikolaus Scholik Special Series on the Strategic Review of Global Hotspots FOKUS | 12/2021 The South China Sea This special Fokus series on the Strategic Review petrated by China as a violation of the ter- nine-dash line, also known as ten-dash of Global Hotspots consists of seven parts and is ritorial sovereignty of the Philippines “by line and the eleven-dash line, a poorly based on the AIES online discussion on the same interfering with its fishing and petroleum defined demarcation line, originally used topic. The online lectures of the authors are exploration and by constructing artificial by the Republic of China in the period available at: aies.at/global-hotspots islands in those islands,” adding also that 1912-1949. Later this theory was used by “those areas are not overlapped by any the governments of the Republic of China possible entitlement of China”. Despite (ROC, which governs Taiwan) and the In political science, a ‘hotspot’ is often being part of the UNCLOS, Beijing rejected People’s Republic of China (PRC), as a basis defined as a geographic area where dif- this legal act and considered it void, and for their claims over most of the SCS. This ferent political actors and interests clash, this constituted a breach of the maritime disputed area includes the Paracel Islands, which can potentially lead to a global conventional law of the UNCLOS. the Spratly Islands and several other areas turning point. Currently, one of the most including the Pratas Islands, Macclesfield critical hotspots in the Indo-Pacific region The UNCLOS is the international legal Bank and Scarborough Shoal. The claim is the South China Sea (SCS) because of its frame work established to regulate globally includes China’s land reclamation known significant strategic dimension. The SCS is all seas related activities, and in particular as the “Great Wall of Sand”. Recently, China located at the nexus of the Pacific and the maritime boundary conflicts. This agree- has started to occupy parts of these terri- Indian Ocean. With two choke points, the ment was concluded in Montego Bay, in tories and has built military facilities such Singapore Strait, and the Malacca Strait, it Jamaica, on 10th December 1982 and as airports and radar stations. This move represents one of the busiest sea-lanes in came into force on 16 November 1994, caused the reaction of other actors such the world. This lifeline is indispensable for one year after the deposit of the instru- as the U.S. and its allies in the region who the transportation of crude oil and other ment of ratification. It is also known as have lodged sharp protests against these raw materials from the Indian Ocean to “UNCLOS III” and has been ratified by 168 actions, once again ignored by Beijing. Up the Pacific, and to ports in China, Taiwan, parties. The works of the UN Conference to this day there have been no clashes, South Korea, and Japan. In the opposite on the Law of the Sea lasted from 1973 to except for a few encounters with U.S. Navy direction, this sea-lane is used by the 1982 being the third of its kind. Preceding ships (e.g., smaller vessels and destroyers), same countries for the transportation of conferences are known as “UNCLOS I and nor has China unnecessarily aggravated their industrial products to the European UNCLOS II”. The Convention summarised the situation, including the withdrawal market and, depending on the goods the previously applicable law of the sea as from their initial decision to establish an and type of transport, the entire Eastern codified in the Geneva Conventions on the overflight zone over the disputed areas. Atlantic. Maintaining free navigation in Law of the Sea (1958), it established the fo- the SCS is a prerequisite for the efficiency regoing disputed breadth of the territorial This excess of precaution might be inter- of global trade dynamics as well as for the sea and its contiguous zone, and also de- preted as a sign of “showing the flag” peaceful coexistence and relations among veloped the regulations on the continental and here China admittedly has a lot of the countries in the region. shelf. The convention introduced various catching up to do. At the current state, important concepts in the development China nor any other actor involved in the In recent decades, the SCS has been at the of maritime law: the exclusive economic region is interested in a military escalation, centre of attention – especially since the zone, as an area in which special rights are however, such situations can be rapidly resurgence of China in the early 80s – be- exercised by coastal states, an internatio- and easily ramped up, should domestic cause of the territorial disputes concerning nal regime of the seabed and its subsoil or foreign policy require. This attitude has some of the islands in the area, which are beyond the limits of the continental shelf, a great importance considering Beijing’s largely uninhabited islets and rocky out- and the archipelagic waters. Finally, it also rising power and public claims to global crops. In order to settle these disputes and regulated the protection and conservation leadership. In this regard, it must be noted in light of the claims by China over these of the marine environment, marine scien- that currently, the PRC might not be able territories, the United Nations Conven- tific research, and the development and to achieve global military dominance, tion on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) was transfer of marine technology. In addition especially on the maritime sector, because invoked by the involved littoral states (e.g., to the older principle of the freedom of of its military inferiority to the U.S. whose the Philippines, Vietnam, and Brunei) in the seas, the Convention is based on the presence in the region is strong. From a several cases. One of the most remarkable newly introduced principle of the common purely practical point of view, while China is the ruling of the court of The Hague in heritage of mankind. does not have a deployable CSG, the 2016 that upheld the claim by the Philip- American navy can draw on three to five pines against China’s view of the nine-dash China’s claims over the islands in the SCS ones simultaneously. Additionally, two of line. The court considered the actions per- are supported by the above mentioned them de facto are permanently based in 1 The South China Sea Special Series on the Strategic Review of Global Hotspots FOKUS | 12/2021 the Pacific Command area, respectively in the combat power of such highly sensi- conflict is “Not wise or not desirable – that Yokosuka and Guam, and therefore they tive and complex assets. At this point, it does not mean impossible.” The impression are directly and rapidly deployable in both remains to be seen to which extent the is that a new cold war is the most probable the SCS and Taiwan’s and Korea’s neigh- capabilities of China will be used and scenario, with new regulations and new bourhood, the East China Sea. moved quickly in the right direction in the risks, but hopefully without any direct attempt to undermine the absolute leader- military confrontation. At least, until China China has tried to respond to the U.S.’ mili- ship of the U.S. in the seas. The change in will be ready to counter the capabilities of tary presence in the region by developing the U.S. presidency from Trump to Biden the U.S. and constitute a military threat for the island chains in the SCS, which are me- will not significantly alter the approach of the global order. ant to serve as military support points to the American foreign policy towards the prevent any movement directed to China’s PRC. The U.S.’ allies in the region, Japan, Mag. Dr. Nikolaus Scholik, coastal area. This strategy of using all mili- Taiwan, South Korea, Australia, and New AIES Senior Advisor tary means (primarily from the land) near Zealand remain part of a militarily superior the coast to deter any adversary’s mari time “ring” that Beijing has not been able to threats is known as A2AD (Anti-Access counter yet, and it will not have the capaci- Area Denial). On the other hand, the ty to do so in the foreseeable future. country has embarked on an ambitious and expensive naval programme and is Nevertheless, China is strongly bolste- well-aware of the fact that it cannot forgo ring its trade efforts, to strengthen its naval power in its bid for global leadership, leadership position in the region. Of particularly when judging by its unfavou- particular importance, is China’s move to rable geographic position. In the compe- approach the Association of Southeast tition, the U.S. not only has a strong naval Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries, with the tradition, but it is also a well-established aim to portray a new more conciliatory naval power with an advantageous posi- self-image and gain new trade partners tion on the map. It has unrestricted access to partially compensate for U.S. military to the Pacific through its West Coast and naval superiority. Notwithstanding, this the island bases strategically positioned strategy is a source of tension, and these close to China, as well as direct access to situations can escalate quickly showing the Atlantic on its East Coast and due to its China’s real intentions. As it was the case in control over the Panama Canal. However, 2001, a U.S. reconnaissance aircraft (EP-3E China’s lifelines are subject to higher secu- ARIES 2), was conducting a reconnaissance rity risks in relation to the transportation of flight from Guam along the Chinese coast vital raw materials and products from and on the 12 nm (22.2 km) boundary, when it to China.
Recommended publications
  • The Demarcation Line
    No.7 “Remembrance and Citizenship” series THE DEMARCATION LINE MINISTRY OF DEFENCE General Secretariat for Administration DIRECTORATE OF MEMORY, HERITAGE AND ARCHIVES Musée de la Résistance Nationale - Champigny The demarcation line in Chalon. The line was marked out in a variety of ways, from sentry boxes… In compliance with the terms of the Franco-German Armistice Convention signed in Rethondes on 22 June 1940, Metropolitan France was divided up on 25 June to create two main zones on either side of an arbitrary abstract line that cut across départements, municipalities, fields and woods. The line was to undergo various modifications over time, dictated by the occupying power’s whims and requirements. Starting from the Spanish border near the municipality of Arnéguy in the département of Basses-Pyrénées (present-day Pyrénées-Atlantiques), the demarcation line continued via Mont-de-Marsan, Libourne, Confolens and Loches, making its way to the north of the département of Indre before turning east and crossing Vierzon, Saint-Amand- Montrond, Moulins, Charolles and Dole to end at the Swiss border near the municipality of Gex. The division created a German-occupied northern zone covering just over half the territory and a free zone to the south, commonly referred to as “zone nono” (for “non- occupied”), with Vichy as its “capital”. The Germans kept the entire Atlantic coast for themselves along with the main industrial regions. In addition, by enacting a whole series of measures designed to restrict movement of people, goods and postal traffic between the two zones, they provided themselves with a means of pressure they could exert at will.
    [Show full text]
  • ASCENT MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2015 L MOOT PROBLEM - INTERNATIONAL
    ASCENT MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2015 l MOOT PROBLEM - INTERNATIONAL SOUTH PRC SEA (SPS) In Dec. 2013 a Malaysian Airline Boeing 777 (MH 370) with 350 PRC and 14 Malaysian citizens onboard disappeared enroute from Hacking to Kuala Lumpur. It’s last dispatch was made when cruising over South PRC Sea. After a series of failed search-operations the Malaysian government declared all on board dead. In another incident around 456 people, mostly tourists, died when the "Eastern Star" rapidly sunk in South PRC Sea in a storm in 2014. Consequently, PRC, given the frequency of disasters in the South PRC Sea, decides to do something about the same. PRC is island-building on previously uninhabited atolls and reefs in the Spratly Islands. It has built a runway on Fiery Cross Reef in the Spratly Island chain, estimated at 3.1 kilometers (1.9 miles). PRC has expanded the acreage on the outposts it occupies by some four hundred times. At four reclamation sites, PRC has moved from dredging operations to infrastructure development that could include harbors, communications and surveillance systems, logistics support and one airfield. PRC has excavated deep channels that could accommodate larger ships to the outposts. PRC is attempting to change facts on the ground by improving its defense infrastructure in the South PRC Sea. Unlike other countries making claims in the area, PRC at the moment does not have an airfield or secure docking at its outposts and the reclamation operations are aimed at ending that disparity. Hacking asserts sovereignty over almost the whole of the South PRC Sea, including areas close to the coasts of other littoral states, using a nine-segment line based on one that first appeared on PRC maps in the 1940s.
    [Show full text]
  • Demilitarization of the Siachen Conflict Zone: Concepts for Implementation and Monitoring
    SANDIA REPORT SAND2007-5670 Unlimited Release Printed September 2007 Demilitarization of the Siachen Conflict Zone: Concepts for Implementation and Monitoring Brigadier (ret.) Asad Hakeem Pakistan Army Brigadier (ret.) Gurmeet Kanwal Indian Army with Michael Vannoni and Gaurav Rajen Sandia National Laboratories Prepared by Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185 and Livermore, California 94550 Sandia is a multiprogram laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company, for the United States Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under Contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. Approved for public release; further dissemination unlimited. Issued by Sandia National Laboratories, operated for the United States Department of Energy by Sandia Corporation. NOTICE: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government, nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, make any warranty, express or implied, or assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represent that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government, any agency thereof, or any of their contractors or subcontractors. The views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government, any agency thereof, or any of their contractors. Printed in the United States of America.
    [Show full text]
  • China and the South China Sea Debate: Crouching Tiger Or Hidden Dragon?
    CHINA AND THE SOUTH CHINA SEA DEBATE: CROUCHING TIGER OR HIDDEN DRAGON? Lieutenant-Commander P.S. Robinson JCSP 39 PCEMI 39 Master of Defence Studies Maîtrise en études de la défense Disclaimer Avertissement Opinions expressed remain those of the author and do Les opinons exprimées n’engagent que leurs auteurs et not represent Department of National Defence or ne reflètent aucunement des politiques du Ministère de Canadian Forces policy. This paper may not be used la Défense nationale ou des Forces canadiennes. Ce without written permission. papier ne peut être reproduit sans autorisation écrite. © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister © Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, représentée par le ministre de la of National Defence, 2013 Défense nationale, 2013. CANADIAN FORCES COLLEGE – COLLÈGE DES FORCES CANADIENNES JCSP 39 – PCEMI 39 2012 – 2013 MASTER OF DEFENCE STUDIES – MAÎTRISE EN ÉTUDES DE LA DÉFENSE CHINA AND THE SOUTH CHINA SEA DEBATE: CROUCHING TIGER OR HIDDEN DRAGON? By Lieutenant-Commander P.S. Robinson Par le Capitaine de corvette P.S. Robinson “This paper was written by a student “La présente étude a été rédigée par attending the Canadian Forces un stagiaire du Collège des Forces College in fulfillment of one of the canadiennes pour satisfaire à l'une requirements of the Course of des exigences du cours. L'étude est Studies. The paper is a scholastic un document qui se rapporte au cours document, and thus contains facts et contient donc des faits et des and opinions, which the author opinions que seul l'auteur considère alone considered appropriate and appropriés et convenables au sujet.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond the Wall: Chinese Far Seas Operation
    U.S. Naval War College U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons CMSI Red Books China Maritime Studies Institute 5-2015 Beyond the Wall: Chinese Far Seas Operation Peter A. Dutton Ryan D. Martinson Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/cmsi-red-books Recommended Citation Dutton, Peter A. and Martinson, Ryan D., "Beyond the Wall: Chinese Far Seas Operation" (2015). CMSI Red Books, Study No. 13. This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the China Maritime Studies Institute at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in CMSI Red Books by an authorized administrator of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Beyond the Wall Chinese Far Seas Operations Peter A. Dutton and Ryan D. Martinson, Editors CHINA MARITIME STUDIES INSTITUTE U.S. NAVAL WAR COLLEGE Newport, Rhode Island www.usnwc.edu/Research---Gaming/China-Maritime-Studies-Institute.aspx Naval War College The China Maritime Studies are extended research projects Newport, Rhode Island that the editor, the Dean of Naval Warfare Studies, and the Center for Naval Warfare Studies President of the Naval War College consider of particular China Maritime Study No. 13 interest to policy makers, scholars, and analysts. May 2015 Correspondence concerning the China Maritime Studies President, Naval War College may be addressed to the director of the China Maritime Rear Admiral P. Gardner Howe III, U.S. Navy Studies Institute, www.usnwc.edu/Research---Gaming/ Provost China-Maritime-Studies-Institute.aspx. To request ad- Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Egypt-Palestine/Israel Boundary: 1841-1992
    University of Northern Iowa UNI ScholarWorks Dissertations and Theses @ UNI Student Work 1992 The Egypt-Palestine/Israel boundary: 1841-1992 Thabit Abu-Rass University of Northern Iowa Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy Copyright ©1992 Thabit Abu-Rass Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/etd Part of the Human Geography Commons Recommended Citation Abu-Rass, Thabit, "The Egypt-Palestine/Israel boundary: 1841-1992" (1992). Dissertations and Theses @ UNI. 695. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/etd/695 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Work at UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses @ UNI by an authorized administrator of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE EGYPT-PALESTINE/ISRAEL BOUNDARY: 1841-1992 An Abstract of a Thesis .Submitted In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the ~egree Master of Arts Thabit Abu-Rass University of Northern Iowa July 1992 ABSTRACT In 1841, with the involvement of European powers, the Ottoman Empire distinguished by Firman territory subject to a Khedive of Egypt from that subject more directly to Istanbul. With British pressure in 1906, a more formal boundary was established between Egypt and Ottoman Palestine. This study focuses on these events and on the history from 1841 to the present. The study area includes the Sinai peninsula and extends from the Suez Canal in the west to what is today southern Israel from Ashqelon on the Mediterranean to the southern shore of the Dead Sea in the east.
    [Show full text]
  • Building the Great Wall of Sand a Research on the 2016 Arbitral Award of the South China Sea Maritime Disputes
    China: Building the Great Wall of Sand A research on the 2016 arbitral award of the South China Sea maritime disputes Master Thesis MA International Relations at Leiden University ------------------------------------- Author: Padberg, Martijn A.C. Student number: S2102145 Student mail: m.a.c.padberg @umail.leidenuniv.nl Supervisor: Prof. dr. F.N. Pieke Word count: 15.006 Date: 6th July 2018 1 China: Building the Great Wall of Sand 2 List of Abbreviations ASEAN Association of Southeast Asian Nations DOC Declaration of the Conduct of the Parties in the South China Sea EEZ Economic Exclusive Zone PCA Permanent Court of Arbitration TPP Trans Pacific Partnership UNCLOS United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea US United States of America 2 Master Thesis: Padberg, Martijn (s2102145) China: Building the Great Wall of Sand 3 Content Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………………………..4 Ch.1 Significance of the South China Sea to China………………………………..............6 Ch.2 The South China Sea Conflict: A Short Overview…………………………………..10 Ch.3 The South China Sea Arbitration (The Republic of Philippines v. The People’s Republic of China)………………………………….14 1. Content of Case No. 2013-19……………………………………........14 2. The Tribunal’s Award…………………………………………………...15 Ch.4 Expectations & Aftermath of the Arbitration……………………………….………...17 Ch.5 Geopolitical Developments……………………………………………………………...21 1. Different president, Different China policy………………………………………………………………………21 2. Lack of U.S. strategy…………………………………………………….23 3. An alliance falling apart………………………………………………….25 Ch.6 Rising China’s Power……………………………………………………………………..28 1. China’s hard power………………………………………………………28 2. China’s soft power……………………………………………………….31 Ch.7 International Institutions and Dispute Settlement…………………………………..33 1. Chinese declaration of exception from dispute settlement………………………………………………….........34 2.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Boundary Lines
    A M K RESOURCE WORLD GENERAL KNOWLEDGE www.amkresourceinfo.com List of Boundary Lines The line which demarcates the two countries is termed as Boundary Line List of important boundary lines Durand Line is the line demarcating the boundaries of Pakistan and Afghanistan. It was drawn up in 1896 by Sir Mortimer Durand. Hindenburg Line is the boundary dividing Germany and Poland. The Germans retreated to this line in 1917 during World War I Mason-Dixon Line is a line of demarcation between four states in the United State. Marginal Line was the 320-km line of fortification on the Russia-Finland border. Drawn up by General Mannerheim. Macmahon Line was drawn up by Sir Henry MacMahon, demarcating the frontier of India and China. China did not recognize the MacMahon line and crossed it in 1962. Medicine Line is the border between Canada and the United States. Radcliffe Line was drawn up by Sir Cyril Radcliffe, demarcating the boundary between India and Pakistan. Siegfried Line is the line of fortification drawn up by Germany on its border with France.Order-Neisse Line is the border between Poland and Germany, running along the Order and Neisse rivers, adopted at the Poland Conference (Aug 1945) after World War II. 17th Parallel defined the boundary between North Vietnam and South Vietnam before two were united. 24th Parallel is the line which Pakistan claims for demarcation between India and Pakistan. This, however, is not recognized by India 26th Parallel south is a circle of latitude which crosses through Africa, Australia and South America. 30th Parallel north is a line of latitude that stands one-third of the way between the equator and the North Pole.
    [Show full text]
  • Transplanting Nationalism: How the Chinese Government Provokes Nationalistic Emotions Where Nationalism Foundation Does Not Exist
    Transplanting Nationalism: How the Chinese Government Provokes Nationalistic Emotions Where Nationalism Foundation Does Not Exist Guanjie Niu A thesis Submitted in partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS IN INTERNATIONAL STUDIES University of Washington 2018 Committee: David Bachman Scott Fritzen Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Henry M. Jackson School of International Studies ©Copyright 2018 Guanjie Niu University of Washington Abstract Transplanting Nationalism: How the Chinese Government Provokes Nationalistic Emotions Where Nationalism Foundation Does Not Exist Guanjie Niu Chair of the Supervisory Committee: David Bachman Jackson School of International Studies During international disputes that involve China, if there is no existing foundation for nationalism, such as historical grievances and former conflicts between the disputing nations, how does the Chinese government manage to evoke a wide-range of nationalistic sentiments in Chinese society in a very short time? To answer this question, I conducted a content analysis based on the Philippines v. China (or the South China Sea Arbitration case) by using articles that were published in the People’s Daily. I argue that the Chinese government attempts to transplant existing nationalistic emotions from other nationalism foundations and symbols, which are familiar with Chinese people, to the “unblemished” target country to create an instant nationalistic fever among the Chinese public if there’s no nationalistic foundation between these two countries.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tall Ship: the Rise of the International Mercantile Marine
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School March 2019 A Tall Ship: The Rise of the International Mercantile Marine Jeffrey N. Brown University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the Economic History Commons, History Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Scholar Commons Citation Brown, Jeffrey N., "A Tall Ship: The Rise of the International Mercantile Marine" (2019). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/8341 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Tall Ship: The Rise of the International Mercantile Marine by Jeffrey N. Brown A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Julia Irwin, Ph.D. K. Stephen Prince, Ph.D. John Belohlavek. Ph.D. Christian Wells, Ph.D. Graydon Tunstall, Ph.D. Date of Approval February 22, 2019 Keywords: Steamship, J.P. Morgan, Clement Griscom, Titanic, Business, Shipping, U.S. Foreign Relations, Anglo-American Relations Copyright © 2019, Jeffrey N. Brown DEDICATION To Mom, John and Gramma. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS There is a long list of people I would like to thank for their support and encouragement. First off, I want to thank my mom and step-father Sandi and John Tipps and my grandmother, Dorothy Douglas for their support.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nature and Scope of the Armistice Agreement
    I The Nature and Scope of the Armistice Agreement 50 AmericanJournal of International Law 880 (1956) I. Introduction or many centuries the annistice agreement has been the method most F frequently employed to bring about a cessation ofhostilities in international conflict, particularly where the opposing belligerents have reached what might be termed a stalemate. This practice has not only continued but has probably increased, during the present century. The first World War ended in an extended series of so-called annistice agreements.! During the twenty-one years which elapsed before the outbreak of the second World War there were really only two such agreements of any historical importance: that entered into in Shanghai on May 5, 1932, which brought about a cessation of hostilities in the Sino-Japanese conflict of that period? and that entered into at Buenos Aires onJune 12, 1935, which ended hostilities between Bolivia and Paraguay over the Gran Chaco.3 The second World War also ended in an extended series ofso-called annistice agreements; 4 and in the comparatively short period of time since then, there have already been no less than ten major general annistice agreements concluded by belligerents.5 This increased importance in modem practice of the general annistice as an instrument leading to the restoration of peace has resulted in it having been likened to the preliminaries of peace 6 (which it has, in fact, practically superseded), and even to a definitive treaty of peace? Under the circumstances, it appears appropriate to review the history and development of the general armistice as a major international convention concerned with the non-hostile relations of belligerents, as well as to detennine its present status under international law.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Sea Lane Security Between the Middle East and Southeast Asia
    US Project Meeting Summary The Future of Sea Lane Security Between the Middle East and Southeast Asia 23–24 June 2015 The views expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the speaker(s) and participants, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Chatham House, its staff, associates or Council. Chatham House is independent and owes no allegiance to any government or to any political body. It does not take institutional positions on policy issues. This document is issued on the understanding that if any extract is used, the author(s)/speaker(s) and Chatham House should be credited, preferably with the date of the publication or details of the event. Where this document refers to or reports statements made by speakers at an event, every effort has been made to provide a fair representation of their views and opinions. The published text of speeches and presentations may differ from delivery. 10 St James’s Square, London SW1Y 4LE, T +44 (0)20 7957 5700 F +44 (0)20 7957 5710 [email protected] www.chathamhouse.org Patron: Her Majesty The Queen Chairman: Stuart Popham QC Director: Dr Robin Niblett Charity Registration Number: 208223 2 The Future of Sea Lane Security Between the Middle East and southeast Asia Introduction On 23–24 June 2015, the Energy Studies Institute (ESI) of the National University of Singapore and Chatham House organized an event entitled ‘The Future of Sea Lane Security Between the Middle East and southeast Asia’. The roundtable took place at the Grand Copthorne Waterfront Hotel in Singapore. As countries in Asia become more reliant on energy supplies from the Middle East, the sea lanes that connect these regions are increasingly important.
    [Show full text]