DOCSLIB.ORG

2Nd State Report Russian Federation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2Nd State Report Russian Federation ACFC/SR/II(2005)003 SECOND REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 25, PARAGRAPH 1 OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES (Received on 26 April 2005) MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION REPORT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PROVISIONS OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Report of the Russian Federation on the progress of the second cycle of monitoring in accordance with Article 25 of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities MOSCOW, 2005 2 Table of contents PREAMBLE ......................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction................................................................................................................... 4 2. The legislation of the Russian Federation for the protection of national minorities rights5 3. Major lines of implementation of the law of the Russian Federation and the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities .......................................................... 15 3.1. National territorial subdivisions ............................................................................... 15 3.2 Public associations – national cultural autonomies and national public organizations17 3.3 National minorities in the system of federal government.......................................... 18 3.4 Development of Ethnic Communities’ National Culture .......................................... 20 3.5 Ethnically Oriented Education ................................................................................. 25 3.6 National Minorities and Mass Media ....................................................................... 31 3.7 Situation of refugees and migrants and problems related to the citizenship of national minorities............................................................................................................................ 36 3.8 Financial support for national minorities.................................................................. 40 4. Replies to the questions of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe ........ 48 4.1 Possible review by the State Duma of the law on the protection of national minorities and improvement of the State National Policy Concept ....................................................... 48 4.2 Results of the 2002 census and major trends related to ethnic minorities, their languages and religions revealed by the census ................................................................... 50 4.3 Information on Amendments to the Federal Law on National and Cultural Autonomy and on its implementation ................................................................................................... 52 4.4 Information on the past and forthcoming elections to representative authorities in terms of participation of national minorities (including information on xenophobia and racism during election campaigns and on measures taken by the Government in this regard).......... 53 4.5 Information on the Work of the Russian Federation Minister for Nationalities and Supposed Development Patterns of this Institution ............................................................. 55 4.6 Information on the Recent Amendments to the Law On Citizenship of the Russian Federation and on the Implementation of this Law .............................................................. 55 4.7 Information on adherence to the principle of freedom of association with regard to organizations dealing with minority issues in the Krasnodar krai......................................... 58 4.8 Information on the situation of the Roma minority in Russia.................................... 61 4.9 Consequences of integration of Perm oblast and Komi-Permyak autonomous okrug for ethnic minorities ............................................................................................................ 65 4.10 Information on creating a post of minister on nationalities affairs of the Chechen Republic and the development of situation in the region with regard to the implementation of the provisions of the Convention ......................................................................................... 67 5. Conclusion .................................................................................................................. 69 Annex 1 .............................................................................................................................. 71 Annex 2 .............................................................................................................................. 76 Annex 3 .............................................................................................................................. 78 Annex 4 .............................................................................................................................. 79 Annex 5 .............................................................................................................................. 92 Annex 6 .............................................................................................................................. 98 Annex 7 ............................................................................................................................ 103 Annex 8 ............................................................................................................................ 105 3 PREAMBLE The Russian Federation joined to the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities on February 28, 1996. Russia ratified the Framework Convention on June 18, 1998. On October 21, 1998 its instruments of ratification were deposited with the Secretariat of the Council of Europe. In respect of the Russian Federation, the Convention entered into force on December 1, 1998. The present report is the second national report on the implementation by Russia of the provisions of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities within the framework of the second cycle of monitoring in accordance with Article 25 of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities and covers the period of 2001-2004, which has passed since the submission of the first and interim national reports. The Russian Federation reaffirms its commitment to comply with the international standards in the field of human rights and freedoms, takes into account the obligations, arising from the international agreements signed by it, including the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities and the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages. 1. Introduction The Russian Federation is a unique State, which occupies a large part of the Eurasian continent. The territory of the country totals 17,075,400 sq. meters, although the density of population is relatively low, which is due to its natural and climatic conditions and, in particular, to the fact that it has vast northern territories, which are hard to develop. The geographical location of Russia and peculiarities of the historical processes of development of the Russian State have determined an ethnical and cultural diversity of its population. Historically, Russia has been developing as a poly-ethnic state uniting numerous peoples. Most of them are historically connected with the territories of the Russian Federation. Meanwhile, Russia has never seen neither ethnic, nor religious genocide, showing tolerance for the representatives of all nations it comprises. According to the 2002 All-Russia census, the population of the Russian Federation amounts to 145,166,000 people (73.3 per cent - urban population, 26.7 per cent - rural population), practicing Christianity, Islam, Buddhism and other religions and faiths. According to the census, there are 160 peoples living in Russia. The majority of population are Russians (79.8 per cent), although their share has fallen by 1.7 per cent compared to 1989. The second largest population group of 5,560,000 people is that of Tatars (nearly 3.8 per cent of the country's population), followed (in decreasing order): the Ukrainians - 2 per cent, the Bashkirs - 1.2 per cent, the Chuvashes - 1.1 per cent, the Chechens - 0.9 per cent, the Armenians - 0.8 per cent, the Avars, Belarusians, Mordovians, Azerbaijani - 0.6 per cent each, the Kazakhs and Udmurts - 0.5 per cent each, the Dargins, Kabardians, Maris, Germans, the Ossetians - 0.4 per cent each, the Buryats, Ingushes, Kumyks, Lakts, Lezgins, Yakuts - 0.3 per cent each, Jews, Komis, Tuvins - 0.2 per cent each, the Adygeis, Altaians, Balkarians, Greeks, Gerorgians, Kalmyks, Karachais, Karelians, Komi-Permyaks, Koreans, Moldavians, Nogais, Poles, Cossacks, Tabasarany, Tadjiks, Turks, Uzbeks, Hakasy, Romany, Circassians - 0.1 per cent each. The total percentage of other peoples does not exceed 3.6. 4 The 2002 census identified 23 largest ethnic groups, each of which exceed 400 thousand people, with 17 such ethnic groups in 1989. Due to the increased population this group was joined by the Azerbaijani, Kabardians, Dargins, Kumyks, Ingushs, Lezgins and Yakuts. As in 1989, seven peoples exceeded one million persons, but the structure of that group has changed - the Chechens and Armenians joined it and Belarusians and Mordovians left it. Moreover, according to 2002 census, the group of Romany increased by almost 20 per cent: 183,000 of them
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 44 Leila Almazova Teaching Religion to Children in Contemporary
    Leila Almazova Teaching Religion to Children in Contemporary Tatarstan: The Case of Islam DOI: https://doi.org/10.22394/2311-3448-2018-5-2-44-62 Leila Almazova — Department of Oriental, African and Islamic Stud- ies, Institute of International Relations, History and Oriental Stud- ies, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University (Russia). leila_almazova @mail.ru This article is devoted to the problem of children’s instruction on Islam in the Republic of Tatarstan. Research is based on fieldwork in several rural districts and six cities carried out in June and July 2017, as well as on the analysis of curricula, textbooks, and publications on religious educational reforms. The study shows that the main factor in how re- ligion is taught in public schools is the multiethnic and multireligious composition of the population (54 and 44 percent of Tatar and Russian populations respectively). Of the six available modules for the study of religion and ethics, only two are taught in Tatarstan — Foundations of World Religious Cultures and Foundations of Secular Ethics. The remaining four — Orthodox, Islamic, Judaic and Buddhist Cultures — although widely taught in other Russian regions — are not utilized in the state schools of Tatarstan. This lack of religious instruction in pub- lic schools determines the intensity of children’s intrareligious educa- tion. The case of Islam shows the diversity of forms of children’s reli- gious education: religion is taught in Muslim kindergartens, in special courses that operate near mosques, in summer camps, discussions and meetings with imams and Islamic clergy at schools, regular courses of Islamic ethics taught by imams at schools, and at Uthmaniya, the private general-education school founded in Kazan by the Tatarstan Muslim Religious Board.
    [Show full text]
  • Nationalism, Politics, and the Practice of Archaeology in the Caucasus
    -.! r. d, J,,f ssaud Artsus^rNn Mlib scoIuswVC ffiLffi pac,^^€C erplJ pue lr{o) '-I dlllqd ,iq pa11pa ,(8oyoe er4lre Jo ecr] JeJd eq] pue 'sct1t1od 'tustleuolleN 6rl Se]tlJlljd 18q1 uueul lOu soop sltll'slstSo[ocPqJJu ul?lsl?JneJ leool '{uetuJO ezrsuqdtue ol qsl'\\ c'tl'laslno aql 1V cqtJo lr?JttrrJ Suteq e:u e,\\ 3llLl,\\'ieqt 'teqlout? ,{g eldoed .uorsso.rciclns euoJo .:etqSnr:1s louJr crleuols,{s eql ul llnseJ {eru leql tsr:d snolJes uoJl uPlseJnPJ lerll JO suoluolstp :o ..sSutpucJsltu,' "(rolsrqerd '..r8u,pn"r.. roJ EtlotlJr qsllqulso ol ]duralltl 3o elqetclecctl Surqsrn8urlstp o.1". 'speecorcl ll sV 'JB ,(rnluec qlxls-pltu eql ut SutuutSeq'et3:oe9 11^ly 'porred uralse,t\ ut uotJl?ztuolol {eer{) o1 saleleJ I se '{1:clncrlled lBJlsselc uP qil'\\ Alluclrol eq] roJ eJueptlc 1r:crSoloaeqcJe uuts11311l?J Jo uollRnlele -ouoJt-loueqlpue-snseon€JuJequoueqlpuE'l?luoulJv'er8rocg'uelteq -JaZVulpJosejotrolsrqerdsqtJoSuouE}erdlelutSutreptsuoc.,{11euor8ar lsrgSurpeeco:cl'lceistqlsulleJlsnlpselduexalere^esButlele;"{qsnsecne3 reded stql cql ur .{SoloeeqJlu Jo olnlpu lecrllod eql elBltsuotuop [lt,\\ .paluroclduslp lou st euo 'scrlr1od ,(:erodueluoJ o1 polelsJUtr '1tns:nd JturcpeJe olpl ue aq or ,{Soloeuqole 3o ecrlcu'rd eq} lcedxa lou plno'{\ 'SIJIUUOC aAISOldxe ouo 3Jor{,t\ PoJe uP sl 1t 'suolllpuoJ aseql IIe UsAtD sluqle pur: ,{poolq ,{11euor1dacxo lulo^es pue salndstp lelrollrrel snor0tunu qlr,n elalder uot,3e; elllBlo^ ,(re,r. e st 1l 'uolun lel^os JeuIJoJ aql io esdelloc eqt ue,tr.3 'snsBsnBJ aql jo seldoed peu'{u oql lle ro3 ln3Sutueau 'l?Iuusllllu
    [Show full text]
  • FSC National Risk Assessment
    FSC National Risk Assessment for the Russian Federation DEVELOPED ACCORDING TO PROCEDURE FSC-PRO-60-002 V3-0 Version V1-0 Code FSC-NRA-RU National approval National decision body: Coordination Council, Association NRG Date: 04 June 2018 International approval FSC International Center, Performance and Standards Unit Date: 11 December 2018 International contact Name: Tatiana Diukova E-mail address: [email protected] Period of validity Date of approval: 11 December 2018 Valid until: (date of approval + 5 years) Body responsible for NRA FSC Russia, [email protected], [email protected] maintenance FSC-NRA-RU V1-0 NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION 2018 – 1 of 78 – Contents Risk designations in finalized risk assessments for the Russian Federation ................................................. 3 1 Background information ........................................................................................................... 4 2 List of experts involved in risk assessment and their contact details ........................................ 6 3 National risk assessment maintenance .................................................................................... 7 4 Complaints and disputes regarding the approved National Risk Assessment ........................... 7 5 List of key stakeholders for consultation ................................................................................... 8 6 List of abbreviations and Russian transliterated terms* used ................................................... 8 7 Risk assessments
    [Show full text]
  • The Mineral Industry of Russia in 2010
    2010 Minerals Yearbook RUSSIA U.S. Department of the Interior October 2012 U.S. Geological Survey THE MINERAL INDUSTRY OF RUSSIA By Elena Safirova Russia was one of the world’s leading mineral-producing Of Russia’s total spending on geologic prospecting, 80.8% countries. In 2010, Russia was ranked among the world’s went into exploration for oil and gas, 9% into exploration for leading producers or was a leading regional producer of such precious metals, and 1.9% into exploration for diamond. In mineral commodities as aluminum, arsenic, asbestos, bauxite, terms of the sources of financing, 70.4% of exploration spending boron, cadmium, cement, coal, cobalt, copper, diamond, was financed by the mineral industry, 16.7% came from fluorspar, gold, iron ore, lime, magnesium compounds and domestic and foreign investors, and 8.2% was contributed from metals, mica (flake, scrap, and sheet), natural gas, nickel, the Federal budget (Federal’naya Sluzhba Gosudarstvennoy nitrogen, oil shale, palladium, peat, petroleum, phosphate, pig Statistiki, 2011b). iron, platinum, potash, rhenium, silicon, steel, sulfur, titanium sponge, tungsten, and vanadium (Angulo, 2012; Apodaca; Government Policies and Programs 2012a–c; Bray, 2012a, b; Brooks, 2012; Corathers, 2012; Edelstein, 2012; Fenton, 2012; Gambogi, 2012; George, In 2009, the Ministry of Industry and Trade of Russia 2012; Jasinski, 2012a, b; Jorgenson, 2012; Kramer, 2012a, b; announced a new program “Strategy for Development of the Kuck, 2012; Loferski, 2012; Miller, 2012a, b; Olson, 2012; Metallurgical Industry for the Period through 2020.” The Polyak, 2012a, b; Shedd, 2012a, b; Tolcin, 2012; van Oss, 2012; new strategy emphasizes metallurgy as one of the sectors of Virta, 2012; Willett, 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • COMMISSION DECISION of 21 December 2005 Amending for The
    L 340/70EN Official Journal of the European Union 23.12.2005 COMMISSION DECISION of 21 December 2005 amending for the second time Decision 2005/693/EC concerning certain protection measures in relation to avian influenza in Russia (notified under document number C(2005) 5563) (Text with EEA relevance) (2005/933/EC) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, cessed parts of feathers from those regions of Russia listed in Annex I to that Decision. Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, (3) Outbreaks of avian influenza continue to occur in certain parts of Russia and it is therefore necessary to prolong the measures provided for in Decision 2005/693/EC. The Decision can however be reviewed before this date depending on information supplied by the competent Having regard to Council Directive 91/496/EEC of 15 July 1991 veterinary authorities of Russia. laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on animals entering the Community from third countries and amending Directives 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC and 90/675/EEC (1), and in particular Article 18(7) thereof, (4) The outbreaks in the European part of Russia have all occurred in the central area and no outbreaks have occurred in the northern regions. It is therefore no longer necessary to continue the suspension of imports of unprocessed feathers and parts of feathers from the Having regard to Council Directive 97/78/EC of 18 December latter. 1997 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on products entering the Community from third countries (2), and in particular Article 22 (6) thereof, (5) Decision 2005/693/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of the Tatneft Company
    LOOKING INTO THE FUTURE ANNUAL REPORT OF THE TATNEFT COMPANY ABOUT OPERATIONS CORPORATE FINANCIAL SOCIAL INDUSTRIAL SAFETY & PJSC TATNEFT, ANNUAL REPORT 2015 THE COMPANY MANAGEMENT RESULTS RESPONSIBILITY ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY CONTENTS ABOUT THE COMPANY 01 Joint Address to Shareholders, Investors and Partners .......................................................................................................... 02 The Company’s Mission ....................................................................................................................................................... 04 Equity Holding Structure of PJSC TATNEFT ........................................................................................................................... 06 Development and Continuity of the Company’s Strategic Initiatives.......................................................................................... 09 Business Model ................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Finanical Position and Strengthening the Assets Structure ...................................................................................................... 12 Major Industrial Factors Affecting the Company’s Activity in 2015 ............................................................................................ 18 Model of Sustainable Development of the Company ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Russia Country Report: Multicultural Experience in Education
    RUSSIA COUNTRY REPORT: MULTICULTURAL EXPERIENCE IN EDUCATION Leila Salekhova, Ksenia Grigorieva Kazan Federal University (RUSSIAN FEDERATION) Abstract The Russian Federation (RF) is a large country with the total area of 17,075,400 sq km. The RF has the world’s ninth-largest population of 146,600,000 people. According to the 2010 census, ethnic Russian people constitute up to 81% of the total population. In total, over 185 different ethnic groups live within the RF borders. Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, and Judaism are Russia’s traditional religions. Russia is a multinational and multicultural state. The large number of different ethnic groups represents the result of a complicated history of migrations, wars and revolutions. The ethnic diversity of Russia has significantly influenced the nature of its development and has had a strong influence on the state education policy. The article gives a detailed analysis of the key factors determining educational opportunities for different RF ethnic groups. A complicated ethnic composition of Russia’s population and its multi-confessional nature cause the educational system to fulfill educational, ethno-cultural and consolidating functions by enriching the educational content with ethnic peculiarities and at the same time providing students with an opportunity to study both in native (non-Russian) and non-native (Russian) languages. The paper provides clear and thorough description of Russian educational system emphasizing positive features like high literacy and educational rates especially in technical areas that are due to the results of the educational system functioning nowadays. Teacher education is provided in different types of educational institutions allowing their graduates to start working as teachers immediately after graduating.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Weekly, 2020
    INSIDE: l Thousands participate in online protest in Ukraine – page 4 l Ukrainians prohibited from owning land in Crimea – page 7 l Bishop uses social media to connect with U.K. faithful – page 9 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY Published by the Ukrainian National Association Inc., a fraternal non-profit association Vol. LXXXVIII No. 14 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, APRIL 5, 2020 $2.00 NEWS ANALYSIS Verkhovna Rada dismisses two crucial ministers Breakthrough in Ukraine’s and approves their replacements amid pandemic land privatization saga by Bohdan Nahaylo The World Bank and others viewed this ban as an unduly conservative and unwar- KYIV – On March 30 and 31, the ranted impediment to Ukraine realizing its Ukrainian Parliament finally delivered on economic potential. It estimated that the two crucial issues set as preconditions by moratorium has deprived Ukraine’s econo- the International Monetary Fund in order my of billions of dollars in land taxes and for the country to receive financial support investment in agriculture. of up to $8 billion to help offset the effects Furthermore, in May 2018 the European of the coronavirus pandemic and its devas- Court of Human Rights declared that the tating impact on Ukraine’s fragile economy. moratorium on farmland sales violated The first involved the adoption in its first Ukrainians’ human rights as Ukrainian reading of the so-called “banking” or “anti- farmers – an estimated 7 million of them – Kolomoisky” bill named after the notorious because they were not allowed to manage billionaire oligarch who wants to recover their property freely. Ukraine’s largest bank, PrivatBank. It was In 2018, a coalition of 39 companies and nationalized in 2016 after he allegedly over 1,500 agricultural producers peti- embezzled $5.5 billion from it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Security of the Caspian Sea Region
    16. The Georgian–Abkhazian conflict Alexander Krylov I. Introduction The Abkhaz have long populated the western Caucasus. They currently number about 100 000 people, speak one of the languages of the Abkhazo-Adygeyan (west Caucasian) language group, and live in the coastal areas on the southern slopes of the Caucasian ridge and along the Black Sea coast. Together with closely related peoples of the western Caucasus (for example, the Abazins, Adygeyans and Kabardians (or Circassians)) they play an important role in the Caucasian ethno-cultural community and consider themselves an integral part of its future. At the same time, the people living in coastal areas on the southern slopes of the Caucasian ridge have achieved broader communication with Asia Minor and the Mediterranean civilizations than any other people of the Caucasus. The geographical position of Abkhazia on the Black Sea coast has made its people a major factor in the historical process of the western Caucasus, acting as an economic and cultural bridge with the outside world. Georgians and Abkhaz have been neighbours from time immemorial. The Georgians currently number about 4 million people. The process of national consolidation of the Georgian nation is still far from complete: it includes some 20 subgroups, and the Megrelians (sometimes called Mingrelians) and Svans who live in western Georgia are so different in language and culture from other Georgians that it would be more correct to consider them as separate peoples. Some scholars, Hewitt, for example,1 suggest calling the Georgian nation not ‘Georgians’ but by their own name, Kartvelians, which includes the Georgians, Megrelians and Svans.2 To call all the different Kartvelian groups ‘Georgians’ obscures the true ethnic situation.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Report Submitted by the Russian Federation Pursuant to The
    ACFC/SR/II(2005)003 SECOND REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 25, PARAGRAPH 2 OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES (Received on 26 April 2005) MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION REPORT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PROVISIONS OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Report of the Russian Federation on the progress of the second cycle of monitoring in accordance with Article 25 of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities MOSCOW, 2005 2 Table of contents PREAMBLE ..............................................................................................................................4 1. Introduction........................................................................................................................4 2. The legislation of the Russian Federation for the protection of national minorities rights5 3. Major lines of implementation of the law of the Russian Federation and the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities .............................................................15 3.1. National territorial subdivisions...................................................................................15 3.2 Public associations – national cultural autonomies and national public organizations17 3.3 National minorities in the system of federal government............................................18 3.4 Development of Ethnic Communities’ National
    [Show full text]
  • Demographic, Economic, Geospatial Data for Municipalities of the Central Federal District in Russia (Excluding the City of Moscow and the Moscow Oblast) in 2010-2016
    Population and Economics 3(4): 121–134 DOI 10.3897/popecon.3.e39152 DATA PAPER Demographic, economic, geospatial data for municipalities of the Central Federal District in Russia (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) in 2010-2016 Irina E. Kalabikhina1, Denis N. Mokrensky2, Aleksandr N. Panin3 1 Faculty of Economics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia 2 Independent researcher 3 Faculty of Geography, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia Received 10 December 2019 ♦ Accepted 28 December 2019 ♦ Published 30 December 2019 Citation: Kalabikhina IE, Mokrensky DN, Panin AN (2019) Demographic, economic, geospatial data for munic- ipalities of the Central Federal District in Russia (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) in 2010- 2016. Population and Economics 3(4): 121–134. https://doi.org/10.3897/popecon.3.e39152 Keywords Data base, demographic, economic, geospatial data JEL Codes: J1, J3, R23, Y10, Y91 I. Brief description The database contains demographic, economic, geospatial data for 452 municipalities of the 16 administrative units of the Central Federal District (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) for 2010–2016 (Appendix, Table 1; Fig. 1). The sources of data are the municipal-level statistics of Rosstat, Google Maps data and calculated indicators. II. Data resources Data package title: Demographic, economic, geospatial data for municipalities of the Cen- tral Federal District in Russia (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) in 2010–2016. Copyright I.E. Kalabikhina, D.N.Mokrensky, A.N.Panin The article is publicly available and in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC-BY 4.0) can be used without limits, distributed and reproduced on any medium, pro- vided that the authors and the source are indicated.
    [Show full text]
  • Investment Cooperation
    YENISEY SIBERIA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INVESTMENT PROPOSALS CONTENTS 3 About Yenisey Siberia Development Corporation 5 Investment proposals of Krasnoyarsk region 7 Development of building lime production 9 Modernization of amorphous graphite production 11 Troitsk saltworks ABOUT 13 Prime meridian medical centre 15 Latta antibacterial sprays YENISEY SIBERIA 17 Football arena chain 19 Marketplace coworking Street for eat DEVELOPMENT 21 Production of freeze-dried berries and functional beverages CORPORATION 23 Establishment of Uyar oil refinery 25 Kuznetsovo Glamping 27 Terephthalic acid production 29 Investment proposals of Khakassia republic 31 Fruit and berry garden 33 Pervomaysky dairy production complex Yenisey Siberia Development Corporation 35 Production of gypsum-based construction materials does not only provide comprehensive support for 37 Tasty Day ready-to-eat healthy food delivery chain large-scale projects but also supports promising investment projects. 39 Berkuty territory of river and cruise tourism 41 Priiskovy tourist and recreation facility development The investment proposals are promising projects 43 Podnebesye all-season resort with a mature concept, which initiators are already on the way of implementing their own ideas. Being at 45 IT center establishment the scaling stage, they are considering cooperation 49 Investment proposals of Tyva republic with a strategic investor as one of the financing options. 51 Full-service medical centre in Kyzyl 53 Full-service dental polyclinic in Kyzyl Interested investors are offered
    [Show full text]